Artykuły w czasopismach na temat „Clinical Outcomes”

Kliknij ten link, aby zobaczyć inne rodzaje publikacji na ten temat: Clinical Outcomes.

Utwórz poprawne odniesienie w stylach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard i wielu innych

Wybierz rodzaj źródła:

Sprawdź 50 najlepszych artykułów w czasopismach naukowych na temat „Clinical Outcomes”.

Przycisk „Dodaj do bibliografii” jest dostępny obok każdej pracy w bibliografii. Użyj go – a my automatycznie utworzymy odniesienie bibliograficzne do wybranej pracy w stylu cytowania, którego potrzebujesz: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver itp.

Możesz również pobrać pełny tekst publikacji naukowej w formacie „.pdf” i przeczytać adnotację do pracy online, jeśli odpowiednie parametry są dostępne w metadanych.

Przeglądaj artykuły w czasopismach z różnych dziedzin i twórz odpowiednie bibliografie.

1

Horikawa, Y., N. Tsuchiya, K. Yuasa, S. Narita, M. Saito, K. Takayama, T. Nara i in. "CLINICAL OUTCOMES". Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 41, nr 3 (1.03.2011): i6—i17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyq254.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
2

Tanash, M., P. A. Gonchar, L. Ababneh i H. Mohidat. "Clinical and Refractive Outcomes after Penetrating Keratoplasty (PKP)". Modern technologies in ophtalmology, nr 5 (20.08.2018): 312–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.25276/2312-4911-2018-5-312-314.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
3

Lavee, J., R. A. Beaupre i A. J. Morgan. "Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs): clinical applications and outcomes". Clinical and Experimental Surgery. Petrovsky journal 8, nr 3 (2020): 123–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.33029/2308-1198-2020-8-3-123-128.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
4

Huang, Jeffrey, Adam Almaguer i John Dennis Busowski. "Comparing Clinical Outcomes". Obstetrics & Gynecology 125 (maj 2015): 75S. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000463157.35699.e2.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
5

Edwards, P., J. Riley, J. Brown, S. George, R. Fillingim, L. Waxenberg, J. Atchison, V. Wittmer i M. Robinson. "Clinical outcomes measurement". Journal of Pain 5, nr 3 (kwiecień 2004): S111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.412.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
6

Williams, D., P. Biswas, J. Kalbfleisch, R. Gracely, S. Chriscinske i D. Clauw. "Clinical outcomes measurement". Journal of Pain 5, nr 3 (kwiecień 2004): S111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.413.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
7

Palos, G., T. Mendoza, G. Mobley, S. Cantor i C. Cleeland. "Clinical outcomes measurement". Journal of Pain 5, nr 3 (kwiecień 2004): S111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.414.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
8

Butler, S., S. Budman, K. Fernandez, C. Benoit i R. Jamison. "Clinical outcomes measurement". Journal of Pain 5, nr 3 (kwiecień 2004): S111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.415.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
9

Gore, M., N. Brandenburg, E. Dukes, D. Hoffman, A. Snyder-Chavis i K. Tai. "Clinical outcomes measurement". Journal of Pain 5, nr 3 (kwiecień 2004): S112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.416.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
10

Fernando, S., M. Ryan, L. Gordon, A. Gordon i R. Kern. "Clinical outcomes measurement". Journal of Pain 5, nr 3 (kwiecień 2004): S112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.417.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
11

Zelman, D., M. Gore, E. Dukes, K. Tai i N. Brandenburg. "Clinical outcomes measurement". Journal of Pain 5, nr 3 (kwiecień 2004): S112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.418.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
12

Labus, J., B. Naliboff, E. Mayer, L. Chang i C. Liu. "Clinical outcomes measurement". Journal of Pain 5, nr 3 (kwiecień 2004): S112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.419.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
13

Williams, V., M. Smith i S. Fehnel. "Clinical outcomes measurement". Journal of Pain 5, nr 3 (kwiecień 2004): S113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.420.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
14

Laing Gibbard, L., B. Sessle, G. Zarb i T. Dao. "Clinical outcomes measurement". Journal of Pain 5, nr 3 (kwiecień 2004): S113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.421.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
15

Black, P., D. Kim, P. Desjardins i J. Jefferson. "Clinical outcomes measurement". Journal of Pain 5, nr 3 (kwiecień 2004): S113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.422.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
16

Hanley, M., M. Jensen, D. Cardenas i J. Turner. "Clinical outcomes measurement". Journal of Pain 5, nr 3 (kwiecień 2004): S113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.423.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
17

Stanos, S., T. Houle, T. Remble i R. Harden. "Clinical outcomes measurement". Journal of Pain 5, nr 3 (kwiecień 2004): S114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.424.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
18

Good, M., S. Huang, X. Cong i Y. Seo. "Clinical outcomes measurement". Journal of Pain 5, nr 3 (kwiecień 2004): S114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.425.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
19

Davis, P., J. Reeves i B. Naliboff. "Clinical outcomes measurement". Journal of Pain 5, nr 3 (kwiecień 2004): S114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.426.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
20

Zelman, D., E. Dukes, N. Brandenburg, A. Bostrom i M. Gore. "Clinical outcomes measurement". Journal of Pain 5, nr 3 (kwiecień 2004): S114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.427.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
21

Vassiliev, D. "Clinical outcomes measurement". Journal of Pain 5, nr 3 (kwiecień 2004): S115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.428.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
22

Zimmerman, B. "Clinical outcomes measurement". Journal of Pain 5, nr 3 (kwiecień 2004): S115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.429.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
23

Bouhassira, D., N. Attal, F. Boureau, B. Brochet, J. Bruxelle, G. Cunin, J. Fermanian i in. "Clinical outcomes measurement". Journal of Pain 5, nr 3 (kwiecień 2004): S115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.430.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
24

Brown, J., P. Edwards, S. George, R. Fillingim, L. Waxenberg, J. Atchison, H. Gremillion i M. Robinson. "Clinical outcomes measurement". Journal of Pain 5, nr 3 (kwiecień 2004): S115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.431.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
25

Hutchison, R., i O. Gonzalez. "Clinical outcomes measurement". Journal of Pain 5, nr 3 (kwiecień 2004): S116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.432.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
26

Henderson, R., i M. Primack. "Clinical outcomes measurement". Journal of Pain 5, nr 3 (kwiecień 2004): S116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.433.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
27

Sonty, N., S. Chokhavatia, G. Griswold, H. Knotkova i W. Clark. "Clinical outcomes measurement". Journal of Pain 5, nr 3 (kwiecień 2004): S116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.434.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
28

Roberts, D., R. Hamill-Ruth, B. Parker, S. Maximous, B. Clark i K. Nelson. "Clinical outcomes measurement". Journal of Pain 5, nr 3 (kwiecień 2004): S116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.435.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
29

Stone, A. "Clinical outcomes measurement". Journal of Pain 5, nr 3 (kwiecień 2004): S9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.572.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
30

McNeill, Jeanette Adams, Gwen D. Sherwood, Patricia L. Starck i Cathy J. Thompson. "Assessing Clinical Outcomes". Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 16, nr 1 (lipiec 1998): 29–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0885-3924(98)00034-7.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
31

Price, Christopher P. "Delivering Clinical Outcomes". Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology 2, nr 3 (wrzesień 2003): 151–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00134384-200309000-00001.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
32

Martinez, Robin. "Clinical Trial Outcomes". JACC: Heart Failure 7, nr 3 (marzec 2019): 272–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2018.12.003.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
33

Pinzur, Michael S. "Measuring Clinical Outcomes". Foot & Ankle International 41, nr 10 (16.03.2020): 1316–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1071100720913931.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
34

Rice, Michelle, i Jane Fellows. "Ostomy-Clinical Outcomes". Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing 36, Supplement (maj 2009): S19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.won.0000351937.45189.41.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
35

Droste, Linda. "Ostomy-Clinical Outcomes". Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing 36, Supplement (maj 2009): S40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.won.0000352004.00684.64.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
36

Giannino, Kerri, i Sharon Rivello. "Ostomy-Clinical Outcomes". Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing 36, Supplement (maj 2009): S51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.won.0000352040.14146.bf.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
37

Svantesson, Eleonor, Eric Hamrin Senorski, Kate E. Webster, Jón Karlsson, Theresa Diermeier, Benjamin B. Rothrauff, Sean J. Meredith i in. "Clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament injury: Panther Symposium ACL Injury Clinical Outcomes Consensus Group". Journal of ISAKOS: Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine 5, nr 5 (22.07.2020): 281–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jisakos-2020-000494.

Pełny tekst źródła
Streszczenie:
PurposeA stringent outcome assessment is a key aspect for establishing evidence-based clinical guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury treatment. The aim of this consensus statement was to establish what data should be reported when conducting an ACL outcome study, what specific outcome measurements should be used and at what follow-up time those outcomes should be assessed.MethodsTo establish a standardised assessment of clinical outcome after ACL treatment, a consensus meeting including a multidisciplinary group of ACL experts was held at the ACL Consensus Meeting Panther Symposium, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, in June 2019. The group reached consensus on nine statements by using a modified Delphi method.ResultsIn general, outcomes after ACL treatment can be divided into four robust categories—early adverse events, patient-reported outcomes, ACL graft failure/recurrent ligament disruption, and clinical measures of knee function and structure. A comprehensive assessment following ACL treatment should aim to provide a complete overview of the treatment result, optimally including the various aspects of outcome categories. For most research questions, a minimum follow-up of 2 years with an optimal follow-up rate of 80% is necessary to achieve a comprehensive assessment. This should include clinical examination, any sustained re-injuries, validated knee-specific patient-reported outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaires. In the mid-term to long-term follow-up, the presence of osteoarthritis should be evaluated.ConclusionThis consensus paper provides practical guidelines for how the aforementioned entities of outcomes should be reported and suggests the preferred tools for a reliable and valid assessment of outcome after ACL treatment.Level of EvidenceLevel V.
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
38

Svantesson, Eleonor, Eric Hamrin Senorski, Kate E. Webster, Jón Karlsson, Theresa Diermeier, Benjamin B. Rothrauff, Sean J. Meredith i in. "Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Panther Symposium ACL Injury Clinical Outcomes Consensus Group". Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 8, nr 7 (1.07.2020): 232596712093475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120934751.

Pełny tekst źródła
Streszczenie:
A stringent outcome assessment is a key aspect of establishing evidence-based clinical guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury treatment. To establish a standardized assessment of clinical outcome after ACL treatment, a consensus meeting including a multidisciplinary group of ACL experts was held at the ACL Consensus Meeting Panther Symposium, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, in June 2019. The aim was to establish a consensus on what data should be reported when conducting an ACL outcome study, what specific outcome measurements should be used, and at what follow-up time those outcomes should be assessed. The group reached consensus on 9 statements by using a modified Delphi method. In general, outcomes after ACL treatment can be divided into 4 robust categories: early adverse events, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), ACL graft failure/recurrent ligament disruption, and clinical measures of knee function and structure. A comprehensive assessment after ACL treatment should aim to provide a complete overview of the treatment result, optimally including the various aspects of outcome categories. For most research questions, a minimum follow-up of 2 years with an optimal follow-up rate of 80% is necessary to achieve a comprehensive assessment. This should include clinical examination, any sustained reinjuries, validated knee-specific PROs, and health-related quality of life questionnaires. In the midterm to long-term follow-up, the presence of osteoarthritis should be evaluated. This consensus paper provides practical guidelines for how the aforementioned entities of outcomes should be reported and suggests the preferred tools for a reliable and valid assessment of outcome after ACL treatment.
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
39

Svantesson, Eleonor, Eric Hamrin Senorski, Kate E. Webster, Jón Karlsson, Theresa Diermeier, Benjamin B. Rothrauff, Sean J. Meredith i in. "Clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament injury: panther symposium ACL injury clinical outcomes consensus group". Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 28, nr 8 (sierpień 2020): 2415–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06061-x.

Pełny tekst źródła
Streszczenie:
Abstract Purpose A stringent outcome assessment is a key aspect for establishing evidence-based clinical guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury treatment. The aim of this consensus statement was to establish what data should be reported when conducting an ACL outcome study, what specific outcome measurements should be used and at what follow-up time those outcomes should be assessed. Methods To establish a standardized approach to assessment of clinical outcome after ACL treatment, a consensus meeting including a multidisciplinary group of ACL experts was held at the ACL Consensus Meeting Panther Symposium, Pittsburgh, PA; USA, in June 2019. The group reached consensus on nine statements by using a modified Delphi method. Results In general, outcomes after ACL treatment can be divided into four robust categories—early adverse events, patient-reported outcomes, ACL graft failure/recurrent ligament disruption and clinical measures of knee function and structure. A comprehensive assessment following ACL treatment should aim to provide a complete overview of the treatment result, optimally including the various aspects of outcome categories. For most research questions, a minimum follow-up of 2 years with an optimal follow-up rate of 80% is necessary to achieve a comprehensive assessment. This should include clinical examination, any sustained re-injuries, validated knee-specific PROs and Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaires. In the mid- to long-term follow-up, the presence of osteoarthritis should be evaluated. Conclusion This consensus paper provides practical guidelines for how the aforementioned entities of outcomes should be reported and suggests the preferred tools for a reliable and valid assessment of outcome after ACL treatment. Level of evidence V.
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
40

Langtry, Heather. "Epilepsy: clinical questions and clinical outcomes". Inpharma Weekly &NA;, nr 1101 (sierpień 1997): 11–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/00128413-199711010-00021.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
41

Burad, Pratik Atul, i Sangeeta Pednekar. "Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Cardiac Arrhythmias in the Elderly". Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery 5, nr 3 (2019): 117–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/jcms.2454.7123.5319.2.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
42

Coyne, Karin S., i Kathleen W. Wyrwich. "ISPOR Task Force For Clinical Outcomes Assessment: Clinical Outcome Assessments: Conceptual Foundation—Report of The ISPOR Clinical Outcomes Assessment – Emerging Good Practices For Outcomes Research Task Force". Value in Health 18, nr 6 (wrzesień 2015): 739–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2015.09.2863.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
43

Esposito, Eleonora, Andrea Cipriani i Corrado Barbui. "Outcome reporting bias in clinical trials". Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 18, nr 1 (marzec 2009): 17–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1121189x00001408.

Pełny tekst źródła
Streszczenie:
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are designed and powered to measure one single outcome, calledprimary outcome(Sibbald & Roland, 1998; Barbuiet al., 2007). The primary outcome is the pre-specified outcome of greatest clinical importance and is usually the one used in the sample size calculation (Accordini, 2007). In addition to the primary outcome, RCTs may have several other outcomes, calledsecondary outcomes. In contrast with the analysis of the primary outcome, the analysis of secondary outcomes and its interpretation may be complicated by at least two factors:1)the trial may not have enough statistical power to detect differences (so it is possible to incur in a type II error, that is failing to see a difference that is present);2)increasing the number of secondary outcomes generates the problem of multiplicity of analyses, that is the proliferation of possible comparisons in a trial (and increasing the number of comparisons increases the possibility to incur in a type I error, that is detecting significant differences by chance). For all these reasons, the results of the analysis of primary outcomes is considered less susceptible to bias than the analysis of secondary outcomes.
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
44

Bateman, Chris. "SmartPhones improving clinical outcomes". South African Medical Journal 101, nr 1 (6.01.2011): 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.7196/samj.4674.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
45

Ishikawa, Masaaki, Harukazu Hiraumi, Norio Yamamoto, Tatsunori Sakamoto, Shinichi Kanemaru i Juichi Ito. "Clinical Outcomes Cochlear Reimplantation". Nippon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho 114, nr 5 (2011): 498–504. http://dx.doi.org/10.3950/jibiinkoka.114.498.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
46

Vincent, Jean-Louis. "EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES". Shock 21, Supplement (marzec 2004): 112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00024382-200403001-00446.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
47

Green, Matthew D., Andrew JG Apel, Thomas Naduvilath i Fiona J. Stapleton. "Clinical outcomes of keratitis". Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology 35, nr 5 (lipiec 2007): 421–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2007.01511.x.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
48

Krumholz, H. M., Z. Lin i S. L. T. Normand. "Measuring hospital clinical outcomes". BMJ 346, jan30 1 (30.01.2013): f620. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f620.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
49

Zaylor, Charles. "Clinical outcomes in telepsychiatry". Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 5, nr 1_suppl (marzec 1999): 59–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/1357633991932577.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
50

Mallidi, Jaya, John Ulahannan, Vinod K. Chaubey, Auras R. Atreya, Muhammad T. Shakoor, Daniel Fisher, Jane Garb i Amir Lotfi. "Comparison of Clinical Outcomes". Critical Pathways in Cardiology 18, nr 3 (wrzesień 2019): 130–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/hpc.0000000000000182.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
Oferujemy zniżki na wszystkie plany premium dla autorów, których prace zostały uwzględnione w tematycznych zestawieniach literatury. Skontaktuj się z nami, aby uzyskać unikalny kod promocyjny!

Do bibliografii