Rozprawy doktorskie na temat „Chose jugée au pénal (droit européen)”
Utwórz poprawne odniesienie w stylach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard i wielu innych
Sprawdź 20 najlepszych rozpraw doktorskich naukowych na temat „Chose jugée au pénal (droit européen)”.
Przycisk „Dodaj do bibliografii” jest dostępny obok każdej pracy w bibliografii. Użyj go – a my automatycznie utworzymy odniesienie bibliograficzne do wybranej pracy w stylu cytowania, którego potrzebujesz: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver itp.
Możesz również pobrać pełny tekst publikacji naukowej w formacie „.pdf” i przeczytać adnotację do pracy online, jeśli odpowiednie parametry są dostępne w metadanych.
Przeglądaj rozprawy doktorskie z różnych dziedzin i twórz odpowiednie bibliografie.
Peloso, Caroline. "Essai de droit comparé franco – italien sur l’autorité de la chose jugée au pénal à l’égard des décisions européennes". Thesis, Bordeaux, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019BORD0037.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe effect of res judicata (also known as “a thing adjudged), an expression of the stability requirement of the jurisdictional decisions and the sovereign state’s capacity to exercise its jurisdictional power by making the final judgement on the matter, is a concept strongly connected with the criminal process which constitutes its natural result. In the last few years, as a result of solicitations of supranational origin whose domestic law is subject, res judicata also undergoes a process of erosion of its irrefutable nature. In particular, while the conflict between res judicata and decisions of the Court of Justice of European Union appears to be “pathological”, the specificities of the conventional system of human right protection provoke a virtually “physiological” conflict with the the doctrine of res judicata in domestic law. This is done considering the principle of subsidiarity and the exhaustion of domestic remedies which characterize the appeal to the European Court of Human Rights jointly with the fact that the requirement of the effective "restitutio in integrum" of the applicant victim of a recognized breach of his rights imposes an obligation to reopen the domestic proceedings, according to article 46 ECHR. The thesis analyses under the angle of Italian and French law, the concepts underlying the conflict, especially the value of res judicata and the impact of European systems of protection of fundamental rights on the internal criminal process, secondly, to examine the concrete ways in which the two legal orders have allowed the effect of res judicata to be exceeded in order to guarantee the execution of ECHR judgments. In this context, the recent entry into force of the Protocol n. 16 at EDH, introducing a consultative mechanism before the ECHR, as well as the prospects outlined by the Protocol n. 15 at ECHR and by the possible accession of the European Union to the conventional system, refocus the recognized role of the ECHR as a regulatory jurisdiction of the European protection system for fundamental rights, and promote the overcoming of the conflict between res judicata and European decisions in favor of the "dialogue" between judges
Peloso, Caroline. "Essai de droit comparé franco – italien sur l’autorité de la chose jugée au pénal à l’égard des décisions européennes". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Bordeaux, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019BORD0037.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe effect of res judicata (also known as “a thing adjudged), an expression of the stability requirement of the jurisdictional decisions and the sovereign state’s capacity to exercise its jurisdictional power by making the final judgement on the matter, is a concept strongly connected with the criminal process which constitutes its natural result. In the last few years, as a result of solicitations of supranational origin whose domestic law is subject, res judicata also undergoes a process of erosion of its irrefutable nature. In particular, while the conflict between res judicata and decisions of the Court of Justice of European Union appears to be “pathological”, the specificities of the conventional system of human right protection provoke a virtually “physiological” conflict with the the doctrine of res judicata in domestic law. This is done considering the principle of subsidiarity and the exhaustion of domestic remedies which characterize the appeal to the European Court of Human Rights jointly with the fact that the requirement of the effective "restitutio in integrum" of the applicant victim of a recognized breach of his rights imposes an obligation to reopen the domestic proceedings, according to article 46 ECHR. The thesis analyses under the angle of Italian and French law, the concepts underlying the conflict, especially the value of res judicata and the impact of European systems of protection of fundamental rights on the internal criminal process, secondly, to examine the concrete ways in which the two legal orders have allowed the effect of res judicata to be exceeded in order to guarantee the execution of ECHR judgments. In this context, the recent entry into force of the Protocol n. 16 at EDH, introducing a consultative mechanism before the ECHR, as well as the prospects outlined by the Protocol n. 15 at ECHR and by the possible accession of the European Union to the conventional system, refocus the recognized role of the ECHR as a regulatory jurisdiction of the European protection system for fundamental rights, and promote the overcoming of the conflict between res judicata and European decisions in favor of the "dialogue" between judges
Lelieur-Fischer, Juliette. "La règle ne bis in idem : du principe de l'autorité de la chose jugée au principe d'unicité d'action répressive : étude à la lumière des droits français, allemand et européen". Paris 1, 2005. http://www.theses.fr/2005PA010318.
Pełny tekst źródłaLafourcade, Magali. "La réouverture des décisions de justice consécutive à un arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme : l'éclairage français". Paris 1, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012PA010290.
Pełny tekst źródłaGoetz, Dorothée. "La révision en matère pénale". Thesis, Strasbourg, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015STRAA036/document.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe coexistence between the procedure of retrial in criminal matters and the authority of res judicata is the cornerstone of this analysis. Understood as an authorization to question a final decision, the procedure of retrial reflects an exception to the fundamental principle of immutability of the judgments which have gained the authority of res judicata. Therefore, the challenge for legislators and judges in matters of revision is to find the right balance between those two imperatives and to organize a review procedure which reconciles the respect of res judicata and the related necessity to repair justice errors made by the criminal courts. The study shows that prior to the reform of the retrial procedure by Act No. 2014-640 of June 20, 2014, the choice of understanding the retrial as opposed to the authority of res judicata had prevailed. Consequently it had granted a rather restrictive design to the review procedure, and had damaged by the same, the rather liberal aspects of Law No. 89-431 of June 23, 1989. However, the antagonism between retrial and the authority of res judicata is still noticeable in the new text. This restraint is not without consequences to the quality of that text and to any new claims referring to the latter
Mamfouana, Allegra Vycinfleur. "La lutte contre les opérations d'initiés au sein des marchés financiers de l'Union européenne". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Toulon, 2023. http://www.theses.fr/2023TOUL0158.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe functioning of the financial markets generates debates, because of their place in the economy of theStates. Their integrity implies their supervision by several actors, as well as their regulation by European andnational legislators. Their protection leads to the prohibition of abuses such as insider trading. Insider tradingis a legally prohibited act carried out by a person in possession of non-public information relating to afinancial instrument and generating informational asymmetry within the financial markets. The prohibition ofinsider trading in Europe, which began in France, was Europeanized in 1989. In 2014, it evolved with theEuropean implementation of a regulation and a directive jointly prohibiting and condemning such marketabuse. Therefore, this thesis analyzes the effectiveness of this European Union intervention. It recalls theprocesses of framing and organization of the financial markets of the Union, and then examines the effects ofthe European legislative harmonization inherent to insider trading. These are sought through an observationstudy of the fight against insider trading in the Member States of the European Union. This study focuses onBelgium, France and Luxembourg
Sadki, Cyrielle. "Le principe ne bis in idem et les sanctions disciplinaires". Thesis, Aix-Marseille, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018AIXM0616.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe adage ne bis in idem already known from Roman law is used in criminal proceedings, it means that no one can be prosecuted twice for the same facts. The purpose of this rule is to guarantee the protection of individual freedoms, including legal certainty and fairness. Under French law, article 368 of the code of criminal procedure provides that "no person who has been acquitted by law may be taken back or charged on the basis of the same facts, even under a different qualification". Ne bis in idem has a three-dimensional building determining the non-cumulation of qualifications, prosecutions and sanctions. Regarding the European aspect, the principle has been submitted by the European court of human rights has important criteria to determine if there is a situation of cumulation of sanctions. The European court of human rights has initiated a change in the French interpretation of the cumulation of sanctions. The Constitutional Council, taking into account the position of the High European court, has given a new turn to the French rule. A process has begun to redefine the scope of application to extend the rule to many cumulative situations including disciplinary sanctions. It is by applying an evolutionary and abundant jurisprudence that we will endeavor to demonstrate that the rule could also apply to certain disciplinary sanctions which can also be cumulated with the penal sanctions
Hedabou, Aziz. "La règle "non bis in idem" : essai d'étude critique en droit répressif pénal et en droit répressif extra-pénal". Toulouse 1, 2008. http://www.theses.fr/2008TOU10049.
Pełny tekst źródłaBernadskaya, Elena. "La sentence arbitrale internationale : contribution de droit processuel comparé (droit français et droit russe)". Thesis, Lyon 3, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011LYO30084.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe arbitral award is a complex legal notion, sharing characteristics with the contract, the jurisdictional act and the judicial decision. Indeed, the jurisdictional dimension of the arbitral award has now been admitted, though, because of its contractual source, it is still considered as a private legal act. The legal regime of this jurisdictional act is therefore influenced by a contractual bias – as from the arbitrators’ appointment up to the enforcement of the arbitral award. A comparative approach shows that the arbitral award’s notion and legal regime are differently considered in French and Russian laws. The differences lie mainly in the interpretation of the legal qualification criteria, though the latter are similar in the two legal systems. The purpose of this analysis is to identify the said differences through the study of the arbitral award’s notion and legal regime in French and Russian laws, which might lead to consider that the specificity of the arbitral award should be preserved instead of considering the award as a judicial decision
Turmo, Araceli. "L'autorité de la chose jugée en droit de l'Union Européenne". Thesis, Paris 2, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016PA020051.
Pełny tekst źródłaRes judicata is a key component of any procedural law. It has been identified as a principle of European Union law by the Court of Justice, which has applied it since the early stages of the European Communities in spite of the absence of any written source. Its bases may be found in fundamental principles such as legal certainty or effective judicial protection. Res judicata firstly appears as an objection of inadmissibility which allows courts to dismiss any action aiming to reexamine previous decisions made by the courts of the European Union. This objection may only be raised if and when the subject-matter in dispute and the parties to the litigation are identical to those in the case which had previously been decided. Res judicata is also used in other circumstances, in order to set the boundaries of a new case which is only partly identical to the previous litigation, or in order to control access to extraordinary remedies. The European Union courts’ functions also require res judicata to be linked to the normative force of judicial acts. Res judicata constitutes a useful complement to the erga omnes authority granted to annulling judgments and, to a lesser extent, to rulings holding an act to be inapplicable. It must however be firmly separated from the normative force attached to judicial rulings in so far as they constitute precedents which create or alter rules of general scope
Niquège, Sylvain. "Juge administratif et droit pénal". Pau, 2007. http://www.theses.fr/2007PAUU2012.
Pełny tekst źródłaRelationships between criminal law and administrative trial give various illustrations. Incompetence of the administrative judge to take cognizance of acts linked with criminal procedure is a classic example. Generally, the whole criminal case’s elements can be used by the parties or the judge during the administrative case. Criminal law also has an impact on the administrative trial. For instance, criminal administrative authorities have to respect individual guaranties attached to the criminal procedure. Could it be concluded to a growing influence of criminal law on administrative judge’s action, or even on administrative law? This idea, commonly evoked, corresponds to a conflictual and outdated way of grasping relationships between jurisdictions and their respective rules. Certainly, constraint’s mechanism, often accepted, partly rules these relationships. Nevertheless, other dynamics such as indifference, influence, and strategic use of criminal law’s resources also characterize them. Respect of criminal judge’s function does not prevent administrative judge from carrying his own one, sometimes by using criminal law. Rather than restricting administrative judge’s action field, criminal law appears as a real resource
Della, Morte Gabriele. "La délimitation de la compétence de la Cour pénale internationale face aux systèmes juridiques externes : hypothèses de conflits et mode de résolution". Paris 1, 2003. http://www.theses.fr/2003PA010285.
Pełny tekst źródłaBouchard, Valérie. "Le droit de recours en matiere penale : contribution a l'etude des droits de la partie poursuivie". Toulon, 2000. http://www.theses.fr/2000TOUL0027.
Pełny tekst źródłaBaron, Elisa. "La coaction en droit pénal". Thesis, Bordeaux 4, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012BOR40049/document.
Pełny tekst źródłaIn criminal law, the co-perpetrator is classically presented as an individual who, acting jointly with another, gathers all the constitutive elements of the offence. However, one may harbor doubts concerning the relevance of this assertion since both case law and legal scholars denature its meaning.Actually, far from being limited to a mere juxtaposition of perpetrations, co-perpetration must be understood as a full mode of participation in the offence. Indeed, it appears as a form of imputation halfway between perpetration and complicity, from which it borrows some characteristics. In other words, it proves to be a mode of participation in one’s own offence. Above all, its particularism is provided by the interdependence between the co-perpetrators : because each of them joins forces with his alter ego, all are placed on an equal footing. These elements, which are found both in it’s concept and in it’s regime, demonstrate thereby the specificity of co-perpetration while strengthening the coherence of the different modes of criminal participation
Baron, Elisa. "La coaction en droit pénal". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Bordeaux 4, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012BOR40049.
Pełny tekst źródłaIn criminal law, the co-perpetrator is classically presented as an individual who, acting jointly with another, gathers all the constitutive elements of the offence. However, one may harbor doubts concerning the relevance of this assertion since both case law and legal scholars denature its meaning.Actually, far from being limited to a mere juxtaposition of perpetrations, co-perpetration must be understood as a full mode of participation in the offence. Indeed, it appears as a form of imputation halfway between perpetration and complicity, from which it borrows some characteristics. In other words, it proves to be a mode of participation in one’s own offence. Above all, its particularism is provided by the interdependence between the co-perpetrators : because each of them joins forces with his alter ego, all are placed on an equal footing. These elements, which are found both in it’s concept and in it’s regime, demonstrate thereby the specificity of co-perpetration while strengthening the coherence of the different modes of criminal participation
Cabrejo, Le Roux Amanda. "Ne bis in idem dans les discours croisés des cours supranationales sur la justice pénale". Thesis, Paris 1, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018PA01D075.
Pełny tekst źródłaNe bis in idem (prohibition of double jeopardy) is well defined in national legal frameworks as a fondamental principle of criminal proceedings according to which an individual cannot be prosecuted twice for the same conduct. But, when moving to the international level, the familiar principle becomes an unidentified legal object. The supranational courts that deal with it in criminal matters (Inter-American Court of Human Rights, European Court of Human Rights, Court of Justice of the European Union and International Criminal Court) interpret disparate ne bis in idem formulations from which they construct their variations. If the identity of ne bis in idem then seems to be diluting, it is not disappearing. Shaped by the discourses of these courts that cross paths, meet or ignore each other, ne bis in idem is metamorphosed. Despite the variants, it is possible to identify common movements in the making of ne bis in idem : the search for spatial and temporal coherency and the need to respond to the dialectics of bis and idem. Moreover, metamorphosis is construction as much as deconstruction. The courts enshrine ne bis in idem as much as they circumvent it by establishing new limits and bypasses. For instance, they allow more and more a second procedure to fight impunity if the first procedure constituted a sham trial. These contrary movements lead to questioning the ambivalent nature of ne bis in idem between its two facets as guarantee and structural element and between rule and principle. Finally, as ne bis in idem is a catalyst for their exchanges, this study offers a unique perspective on the role of supranational courts in the internationalization of criminal justice
Koukezian, Thomas. "Sanction pénale sanction disciplinaire". Thesis, Rennes 1, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014REN1G018.
Pełny tekst źródłaDeux thèses s’affrontent concernant les liens qu’entretiennent la sanction pénale et la sanction disciplinaire. Une première conception considère que la sanction disciplinaire est distincte de la sanction pénale. Elle en diffère tellement qu’on ne saurait les rapprocher. L’autre conception, plus actuelle, considère que la sanction disciplinaire est une variété de la sanction pénale, qui la supplée ou la double, et qui obéit, en partie du moins, à des principes communs. La deuxième conception semble évidemment plus en phase avec la réalité. Cependant, cette façon d’entrevoir ces deux matières ne fait point l’unanimité. En considérant la sanction disciplinaire comme une fraction de la sanction pénale, comment entrer dans une telle considération devant le principe d’indépendance qui tient à distance les deux sanctions ? Et, si ce principe tient à distance les deux sanctions, c’est donc qu’il existe un domaine propre à chacune d’elles et une frontière entre ces deux domaines. L’étude consacrée aux sanctions pénales et disciplinaires se propose de tracer une frontière lisible entre ces deux sanctions et de mettre en lumière les caractéristiques peu connues de la sanction disciplinaire
Nardari, Leslie. "Le cumul de sanctions". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Toulouse 1, 2020. http://www.theses.fr/2020TOU10028.
Pełny tekst źródłaCumulation of penalties refers to a situation in which an individual person is punished by multiple penalties. At first glance, this appears as an anomaly. However, exceed as it may the principle of bare necessity in the implementation of criminal law, the cumulation of penalties remains very common in the French legal system. The European Court of Human Rights, the European Court of Justice and the French Conseil Constitutionnel’s recent case laws overhauled the conditions of validity of cumulations of penalties, thus challenging their de facto acceptance in the French legal system. Cumulations of penalties are thus subjected to a stricter framework, albeit mitigated by the recognition of the conformity of complementary procedures. However, the control standards used to regulate the cumulation of penalties prescribe the conditions of validity, but do not stipulate means to prevent or adapt cumulation of penalties that do not comply to those criteria. In the course of this thesis, remedial solutions will be proposed to deal with the issues raised
Peketi, Essodjilobouwè. "Essai critique sur la notion d’homologation judiciaire". Thesis, Paris 2, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018PA020078.
Pełny tekst źródłaJudicial approval shows in a remarkable way how the function of judging contains different aspects. This Judicial activity is in itself a judicial procedure which ensures the control of agreements validly concluded between parties or which will become valid if their conformity with the requirements of substantive law is judicially recognized / if their conformity with the requirements of substantive law is established/ if these agreements fulfil the conditions required by the substantive law.If there is no doubt that the process of judicial homologation is unique, it must be however observed that the homologation procedures according to their purposes are distinct from each other. In fact, the procedural rules of judicial approval/judicial depend considerably on the substantive law to be applied. That’s why, it can be said in this context, that substantive law controls procedural law; for it is substantive law which determines the judge's procedural conduct when judicial approval is requested. The degree or level of the judicial control exercised over the agreements of the parties is a proof of this.What about the registration judgment regime? It is inspired by the substantive law of each subject in which the registration judgment is rendered. We could give more examples. Let us confine ourselves to the authority of res judicata, allowed in the approved agreement on divorce by mutual consent, and refused in the approved notarial deed on change of matrimonial regime. The authority of res judicata is also considered to be admitted for certified transactions in administrative matters, but rejected for certified transactions in civil matters. These brief indications probably support the idea that judicial homologation is primarily a matter of substantive law. In other words, contrary to what is often said in doctrine, homologation is a matter of substantive law before it is a procedural matter
Kardimis, Théofanis. "La chambre criminelle de la Cour de cassation face à l’article 6 de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme : étude juridictionnelle comparée (France-Grèce)". Thesis, Lyon, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017LYSE3004.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe first party of the study is dedicated to the invocation of the right to a fair trial intra and extra muros and, on this basis, it focuses on the direct applicability of Article 6 and the subsidiarity of the Convention and of the European Court of Human Rights. Because of the fact that the right to a fair trial is a ‘‘judge-made law’’, the study also focuses on the invocability of the judgments of the European Court and more precisely on the direct invocability of the European Court’s judgment finding that there has been a violation of the Convention and on the request for an interpretation in accordance with the European Court’s decisions. The possibility of reviewing the criminal judgment made in violation of the Convention has generated a new right of access to the Court of cassation which particularly concerns the violations of the right to a fair trial and is probably the most important step for the respect of the right to a fair trial after enabling the right of individual petition. As for the weak conventional basis of the authority of res interpretata (“autorité de la chose interprétée”), this fact explains why an indirect dialogue between the ECHR and the Court of cassation is possible but doesn’t affect the applicant’s right to request an interpretation in accordance with the Court’s decisions and the duty of the Court of cassation to explain why it has decided to depart from the (non-binding) precedent.The second party of the study is bigger than the first one and is dedicated to the guarantees of the proper administration of justice (Article 6§1), the presumption of innocence (Article 6§2), the rights which find their conventional basis on the Article 6§1 but their logical explanation to the presumption of innocence and the rights of defence (Article 6§3). More precisely, the second party of the study is analyzing the right to an independent and impartial tribunal established by law, the right to a hearing within a reasonable time, the principle of equality of arms, the right to adversarial proceedings, the right of the defence to the last word, the right to a public hearing and a public pronouncement of the judgement, the judge’s duty to state the reasons for his decision, the presumption of innocence, in both its procedural and personal dimensions, the accused’s right to lie, his right to remain silent, his right against self-incrimination, his right to be informed of the nature and the cause of the accusation and the potential re-characterisation of the facts, his right to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of the defence, including in particular the access to the case-file and the free and confidential communication with his lawyer, his right to appear in person at the trial, his right to defend either in person or through legal assistance, his right to be represented by his counsel, his right to free legal aid if he hasn’t sufficient means to pay for legal assistance but the interests of justice so require, his right to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him and his right to the free assistance of an interpreter and to the translation of the key documents. The analysis is based on the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and focuses on the position taken by the French and the Greek Court of Cassation (Areopagus) on each one of the above mentioned rights