Gotowa bibliografia na temat „Chose jugée au pénal (droit européen)”
Utwórz poprawne odniesienie w stylach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard i wielu innych
Spis treści
Zobacz listy aktualnych artykułów, książek, rozpraw, streszczeń i innych źródeł naukowych na temat „Chose jugée au pénal (droit européen)”.
Przycisk „Dodaj do bibliografii” jest dostępny obok każdej pracy w bibliografii. Użyj go – a my automatycznie utworzymy odniesienie bibliograficzne do wybranej pracy w stylu cytowania, którego potrzebujesz: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver itp.
Możesz również pobrać pełny tekst publikacji naukowej w formacie „.pdf” i przeczytać adnotację do pracy online, jeśli odpowiednie parametry są dostępne w metadanych.
Artykuły w czasopismach na temat "Chose jugée au pénal (droit européen)"
Kessedjian, Catherine. "L’autorité de la chose jugée et l’effectivité du droit européen". ERA Forum 11, nr 2 (17.06.2010): 263–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12027-010-0162-z.
Pełny tekst źródłaPradel, Jean. "Le déroulement du procès pénal français (aperçus comparatifs avec le droit canadien)". Revue générale de droit 16, nr 3 (1.05.2019): 575–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1059283ar.
Pełny tekst źródłaRozprawy doktorskie na temat "Chose jugée au pénal (droit européen)"
Peloso, Caroline. "Essai de droit comparé franco – italien sur l’autorité de la chose jugée au pénal à l’égard des décisions européennes". Thesis, Bordeaux, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019BORD0037.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe effect of res judicata (also known as “a thing adjudged), an expression of the stability requirement of the jurisdictional decisions and the sovereign state’s capacity to exercise its jurisdictional power by making the final judgement on the matter, is a concept strongly connected with the criminal process which constitutes its natural result. In the last few years, as a result of solicitations of supranational origin whose domestic law is subject, res judicata also undergoes a process of erosion of its irrefutable nature. In particular, while the conflict between res judicata and decisions of the Court of Justice of European Union appears to be “pathological”, the specificities of the conventional system of human right protection provoke a virtually “physiological” conflict with the the doctrine of res judicata in domestic law. This is done considering the principle of subsidiarity and the exhaustion of domestic remedies which characterize the appeal to the European Court of Human Rights jointly with the fact that the requirement of the effective "restitutio in integrum" of the applicant victim of a recognized breach of his rights imposes an obligation to reopen the domestic proceedings, according to article 46 ECHR. The thesis analyses under the angle of Italian and French law, the concepts underlying the conflict, especially the value of res judicata and the impact of European systems of protection of fundamental rights on the internal criminal process, secondly, to examine the concrete ways in which the two legal orders have allowed the effect of res judicata to be exceeded in order to guarantee the execution of ECHR judgments. In this context, the recent entry into force of the Protocol n. 16 at EDH, introducing a consultative mechanism before the ECHR, as well as the prospects outlined by the Protocol n. 15 at ECHR and by the possible accession of the European Union to the conventional system, refocus the recognized role of the ECHR as a regulatory jurisdiction of the European protection system for fundamental rights, and promote the overcoming of the conflict between res judicata and European decisions in favor of the "dialogue" between judges
Peloso, Caroline. "Essai de droit comparé franco – italien sur l’autorité de la chose jugée au pénal à l’égard des décisions européennes". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Bordeaux, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019BORD0037.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe effect of res judicata (also known as “a thing adjudged), an expression of the stability requirement of the jurisdictional decisions and the sovereign state’s capacity to exercise its jurisdictional power by making the final judgement on the matter, is a concept strongly connected with the criminal process which constitutes its natural result. In the last few years, as a result of solicitations of supranational origin whose domestic law is subject, res judicata also undergoes a process of erosion of its irrefutable nature. In particular, while the conflict between res judicata and decisions of the Court of Justice of European Union appears to be “pathological”, the specificities of the conventional system of human right protection provoke a virtually “physiological” conflict with the the doctrine of res judicata in domestic law. This is done considering the principle of subsidiarity and the exhaustion of domestic remedies which characterize the appeal to the European Court of Human Rights jointly with the fact that the requirement of the effective "restitutio in integrum" of the applicant victim of a recognized breach of his rights imposes an obligation to reopen the domestic proceedings, according to article 46 ECHR. The thesis analyses under the angle of Italian and French law, the concepts underlying the conflict, especially the value of res judicata and the impact of European systems of protection of fundamental rights on the internal criminal process, secondly, to examine the concrete ways in which the two legal orders have allowed the effect of res judicata to be exceeded in order to guarantee the execution of ECHR judgments. In this context, the recent entry into force of the Protocol n. 16 at EDH, introducing a consultative mechanism before the ECHR, as well as the prospects outlined by the Protocol n. 15 at ECHR and by the possible accession of the European Union to the conventional system, refocus the recognized role of the ECHR as a regulatory jurisdiction of the European protection system for fundamental rights, and promote the overcoming of the conflict between res judicata and European decisions in favor of the "dialogue" between judges
Lelieur-Fischer, Juliette. "La règle ne bis in idem : du principe de l'autorité de la chose jugée au principe d'unicité d'action répressive : étude à la lumière des droits français, allemand et européen". Paris 1, 2005. http://www.theses.fr/2005PA010318.
Pełny tekst źródłaLafourcade, Magali. "La réouverture des décisions de justice consécutive à un arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme : l'éclairage français". Paris 1, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012PA010290.
Pełny tekst źródłaGoetz, Dorothée. "La révision en matère pénale". Thesis, Strasbourg, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015STRAA036/document.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe coexistence between the procedure of retrial in criminal matters and the authority of res judicata is the cornerstone of this analysis. Understood as an authorization to question a final decision, the procedure of retrial reflects an exception to the fundamental principle of immutability of the judgments which have gained the authority of res judicata. Therefore, the challenge for legislators and judges in matters of revision is to find the right balance between those two imperatives and to organize a review procedure which reconciles the respect of res judicata and the related necessity to repair justice errors made by the criminal courts. The study shows that prior to the reform of the retrial procedure by Act No. 2014-640 of June 20, 2014, the choice of understanding the retrial as opposed to the authority of res judicata had prevailed. Consequently it had granted a rather restrictive design to the review procedure, and had damaged by the same, the rather liberal aspects of Law No. 89-431 of June 23, 1989. However, the antagonism between retrial and the authority of res judicata is still noticeable in the new text. This restraint is not without consequences to the quality of that text and to any new claims referring to the latter
Mamfouana, Allegra Vycinfleur. "La lutte contre les opérations d'initiés au sein des marchés financiers de l'Union européenne". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Toulon, 2023. http://www.theses.fr/2023TOUL0158.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe functioning of the financial markets generates debates, because of their place in the economy of theStates. Their integrity implies their supervision by several actors, as well as their regulation by European andnational legislators. Their protection leads to the prohibition of abuses such as insider trading. Insider tradingis a legally prohibited act carried out by a person in possession of non-public information relating to afinancial instrument and generating informational asymmetry within the financial markets. The prohibition ofinsider trading in Europe, which began in France, was Europeanized in 1989. In 2014, it evolved with theEuropean implementation of a regulation and a directive jointly prohibiting and condemning such marketabuse. Therefore, this thesis analyzes the effectiveness of this European Union intervention. It recalls theprocesses of framing and organization of the financial markets of the Union, and then examines the effects ofthe European legislative harmonization inherent to insider trading. These are sought through an observationstudy of the fight against insider trading in the Member States of the European Union. This study focuses onBelgium, France and Luxembourg
Sadki, Cyrielle. "Le principe ne bis in idem et les sanctions disciplinaires". Thesis, Aix-Marseille, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018AIXM0616.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe adage ne bis in idem already known from Roman law is used in criminal proceedings, it means that no one can be prosecuted twice for the same facts. The purpose of this rule is to guarantee the protection of individual freedoms, including legal certainty and fairness. Under French law, article 368 of the code of criminal procedure provides that "no person who has been acquitted by law may be taken back or charged on the basis of the same facts, even under a different qualification". Ne bis in idem has a three-dimensional building determining the non-cumulation of qualifications, prosecutions and sanctions. Regarding the European aspect, the principle has been submitted by the European court of human rights has important criteria to determine if there is a situation of cumulation of sanctions. The European court of human rights has initiated a change in the French interpretation of the cumulation of sanctions. The Constitutional Council, taking into account the position of the High European court, has given a new turn to the French rule. A process has begun to redefine the scope of application to extend the rule to many cumulative situations including disciplinary sanctions. It is by applying an evolutionary and abundant jurisprudence that we will endeavor to demonstrate that the rule could also apply to certain disciplinary sanctions which can also be cumulated with the penal sanctions
Hedabou, Aziz. "La règle "non bis in idem" : essai d'étude critique en droit répressif pénal et en droit répressif extra-pénal". Toulouse 1, 2008. http://www.theses.fr/2008TOU10049.
Pełny tekst źródłaBernadskaya, Elena. "La sentence arbitrale internationale : contribution de droit processuel comparé (droit français et droit russe)". Thesis, Lyon 3, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011LYO30084.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe arbitral award is a complex legal notion, sharing characteristics with the contract, the jurisdictional act and the judicial decision. Indeed, the jurisdictional dimension of the arbitral award has now been admitted, though, because of its contractual source, it is still considered as a private legal act. The legal regime of this jurisdictional act is therefore influenced by a contractual bias – as from the arbitrators’ appointment up to the enforcement of the arbitral award. A comparative approach shows that the arbitral award’s notion and legal regime are differently considered in French and Russian laws. The differences lie mainly in the interpretation of the legal qualification criteria, though the latter are similar in the two legal systems. The purpose of this analysis is to identify the said differences through the study of the arbitral award’s notion and legal regime in French and Russian laws, which might lead to consider that the specificity of the arbitral award should be preserved instead of considering the award as a judicial decision
Turmo, Araceli. "L'autorité de la chose jugée en droit de l'Union Européenne". Thesis, Paris 2, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016PA020051.
Pełny tekst źródłaRes judicata is a key component of any procedural law. It has been identified as a principle of European Union law by the Court of Justice, which has applied it since the early stages of the European Communities in spite of the absence of any written source. Its bases may be found in fundamental principles such as legal certainty or effective judicial protection. Res judicata firstly appears as an objection of inadmissibility which allows courts to dismiss any action aiming to reexamine previous decisions made by the courts of the European Union. This objection may only be raised if and when the subject-matter in dispute and the parties to the litigation are identical to those in the case which had previously been decided. Res judicata is also used in other circumstances, in order to set the boundaries of a new case which is only partly identical to the previous litigation, or in order to control access to extraordinary remedies. The European Union courts’ functions also require res judicata to be linked to the normative force of judicial acts. Res judicata constitutes a useful complement to the erga omnes authority granted to annulling judgments and, to a lesser extent, to rulings holding an act to be inapplicable. It must however be firmly separated from the normative force attached to judicial rulings in so far as they constitute precedents which create or alter rules of general scope