Letteratura scientifica selezionata sul tema "Sex differences – social aspects – great britain"
Cita una fonte nei formati APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard e in molti altri stili
Consulta la lista di attuali articoli, libri, tesi, atti di convegni e altre fonti scientifiche attinenti al tema "Sex differences – social aspects – great britain".
Accanto a ogni fonte nell'elenco di riferimenti c'è un pulsante "Aggiungi alla bibliografia". Premilo e genereremo automaticamente la citazione bibliografica dell'opera scelta nello stile citazionale di cui hai bisogno: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver ecc.
Puoi anche scaricare il testo completo della pubblicazione scientifica nel formato .pdf e leggere online l'abstract (il sommario) dell'opera se è presente nei metadati.
Articoli di riviste sul tema "Sex differences – social aspects – great britain"
Spasovski, Milena, e Danica Santic. "Development of population geography from antropogeography to spatial-analitical approach". Stanovnistvo 51, n. 2 (2013): 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/stnv1302001s.
Testo completoStewart-Williams, Steve, e Lewis G. Halsey. "Men, women and STEM: Why the differences and what should be done?" European Journal of Personality 35, n. 1 (gennaio 2021): 3–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0890207020962326.
Testo completoEspinoza, Francisco, Alys Young e Claire Dodds. "Political participation among deaf youth in Great Britain". PLOS ONE 19, n. 4 (4 aprile 2024): e0301053. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301053.
Testo completoBROESE van GROENOU, MARJOLEIN, KAREN GLASER, CECILIA TOMASSINI e THÉRÈSE JACOBS. "Socio-economic status differences in older people's use of informal and formal help: a comparison of four European countries". Ageing and Society 26, n. 5 (1 agosto 2006): 745–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x06005241.
Testo completoMarques, Iuri, Sarah Caroline Willis, Ellen Ingrid Schafheutle e Karen Hassell. "Development of an instrument to measure organisational culture in community pharmacies in Great Britain". Journal of Health Organization and Management 32, n. 2 (9 aprile 2018): 176–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jhom-06-2017-0131.
Testo completoŽygaitienė, Birutė, e Evelina Buivydaitė. "A Teacher of Technological Education in Lithuania, Great Britain and Finland. What is She Like?" Pedagogika 129, n. 1 (25 aprile 2018): 268–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.15823/p.2018.18.
Testo completoJeder, Daniela. "Pedagogy of diversity in teacher training". Journal of Education, Society & Multiculturalism 3, n. 2 (1 dicembre 2022): 236–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jesm-2022-0029.
Testo completoPROTASOV, ANDREI D., ELENA S. STARODUBTSEVA, GABRIEL A. MOSHLYAK e ALEXANDER V. ZHESTKOV. "CONTEMPORARY GLOBAL TRENDS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF HIGHER MEDICAL EDUCATION IN THE USA, GREAT BRITAIN, FRANCE, AND CHINA". Bulletin of Contemporary Clinical Medicine 16, n. 5 (ottobre 2023): 127–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.20969/vskm.2023.16(5).127-135.
Testo completoPless, Ivan B., Christine Power e Catherine S. Peckham. "Long-term Psychosocial Sequelae of Chronic Physical Disorders in Childhood". Pediatrics 91, n. 6 (1 giugno 1993): 1131–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.91.6.1131.
Testo completoSage, Lucas, Marco Albertini e Stefani Scherer. "The spreading of SARS-CoV-2: Interage contacts and networks degree distribution". PLOS ONE 16, n. 8 (25 agosto 2021): e0256036. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256036.
Testo completoTesi sul tema "Sex differences – social aspects – great britain"
Ben-Galim, Dalia. "Equality and diversity : the gender dimensions of work-life balance policies". Thesis, University of Oxford, 2008. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d078b9c7-ceab-454c-a1b6-09ebe88fb725.
Testo completoLibri sul tema "Sex differences – social aspects – great britain"
Harman, Harriet. The century gap: 20th century man, 21st century woman : how both sexes can bridge the century gap. London: Vermillion, 1993.
Cerca il testo completoDavid, Miriam E. Parents, gender, and education reform. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1993.
Cerca il testo completoJennifer, Coates, e Cameron Deborah 1958-, a cura di. Women in their speech communities: New perspectives on language and sex. London: Longman, 1988.
Cerca il testo completoAbraham, John. Divide and school: Gender and class dynamics in comprehensive education. London: Falmer Press, 1995.
Cerca il testo completoKent, Susan Kingsley. Gender and Power in Britain 1640-1990. London: Taylor & Francis Inc, 2002.
Cerca il testo completoBen, Cosin, Hales Margaret e Open University, a cura di. Families, education, and social differences. London: Routledge in association with the Open University, 1997.
Cerca il testo completoPrescott, Sarah. Women, authorship, and literary culture, 1690-1740. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
Cerca il testo completoJohn, Costello. Love sex and war: Changing values 1939-45. London: Guild Publishing, 1985.
Cerca il testo completoJohn, Hill. Sex, class, and realism: British cinema, 1956-1963. London: BFI Pub., 1986.
Cerca il testo completoOrme, Joan. Gender and community care: Social work and social care perspectives. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave, 2001.
Cerca il testo completoCapitoli di libri sul tema "Sex differences – social aspects – great britain"
"interpreted in different ways by individual scholars. Why, for example, is the preponderance of male depictions seen at Grot ta di Porto Badisco interpeted as meaning male domination of Neolithic society in Italy (Whitehouse, 1992b) whereas Hodder (1990: 68) declines to interpret the common occurrence of female figurines in the Neolithic of S.E. Europe as an indication of an equivalent female domination of society, but instead suggests "To put it over-simply, women may or may not have had any real power in the Neolithic of S.E. Europe, but certain aspects of being a woman were conceptually central."? One can cite a similar example from Skeates (1994: 207-8), where he accepts Whitehouse's identification of the human figures as males or females, but disagrees with her interpretation of male dominance and hostility between the sexes in Italian Neolithic society. Each of these two scholars also has their own interpretation of the important group 16 painted scene from the Grotta do Porto Badisco — needless to say, I also have mine. By turning to burial evidence, can one avoid the above dilemmas? Physical anthropological methods can be used to identify male and female human remains, and, knowing the sex of burials could then lead to a better understanding of the gender affiliations of accompanying grave goods. These artefacts can then be investigated in other contexts such as settlement sites. However, there is a surprising amount of uncertainty involved in sexing human remains. In this paper I wish to discuss the uncertainties in the physical anthropological methods of sexing human remains and their implications for gender studies by focussing on a recent analysis of an Iron Age necropolis at Pontecagnario, Campania, carried out by Vida Navarro (1992). PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGICAL METHODS OF SEXING HUMAN REMAINS Since gender is culturally constructed, it is possible for individuals or groups to have a gender that is different from their biological sex, or is intermediate or anomalous in some way. For example, in Ancient Rome, a Vestal Virgin had an ambiguous status in Roman society as shown by the fact that she could give evidence in a law court like a man. Usually Roman women had to be represented by a male relation or their spouse and could not speak in court on their own behalf or give evidence (Beard 1980: 17). Nevertheless, a Vestal Virgin was still a woman, and was allowed to marry, if she so wished, after her term of office finished (Beard 1980:, 14, note 21). Although ambiguous groups of this kind have been recognised in many societies, it is nonetheless the case that one would expect a high level of correlation between biological sex and social gender. The accurate identification of the biological sex of human remains would therefore be a great step forward in understanding gender construction and gender roles in prehistory. Unfortunately, physical anthropological methods are reliable only to a certain extent, and it is important for all archaeologists to be aware of the limitations of these methods. Like other primates, humans show sexual dimorphism i.e., the males have a larger body and show other skeletal differences from females, especially in the shape of the pelvis. When an intact pelvis is present in a burial, the identification of those remains as male or female can be made with 95% confidence (Krogman & Iscan 1986: 259). This, of course, applies to recent skeletal material, as the morphological and morphometric methods for sex identification used by anthropologists are based on reference collections from modern human populations. As Gotherstrom et ¿z/. (1997) point out, the application of these standards to prehistoric remains may be inappropriate. Prehistoric females may have been more skeletally robust, so that in the absence of a diagnostic pelvis, they could appear to be males, according to standards derived from modern populations. The pelvis anchors muscles, and "Considering the plasticity of the skeleton in response to external forces and stimuli, there are reasons to proceed with caution in interpreting all morphological differences in the pelvic region as a result of differential reproductive function." (Gotherstrom et al. 1997)." In Gender & Italian Archaeology, 44–58. Routledge, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315428178-13.
Testo completo