Articoli di riviste sul tema "Process of privatization"
Segui questo link per vedere altri tipi di pubblicazioni sul tema: Process of privatization.
Cita una fonte nei formati APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard e in molti altri stili
Vedi i top-50 articoli di riviste per l'attività di ricerca sul tema "Process of privatization".
Accanto a ogni fonte nell'elenco di riferimenti c'è un pulsante "Aggiungi alla bibliografia". Premilo e genereremo automaticamente la citazione bibliografica dell'opera scelta nello stile citazionale di cui hai bisogno: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver ecc.
Puoi anche scaricare il testo completo della pubblicazione scientifica nel formato .pdf e leggere online l'abstract (il sommario) dell'opera se è presente nei metadati.
Vedi gli articoli di riviste di molte aree scientifiche e compila una bibliografia corretta.
1
Hunter, Richard J., e Leo V. Ryan. "A Field Report on the Background and Processes of Privatization in Poland". Global Economy Journal 8, n. 1 (gennaio 2008): 1850124. http://dx.doi.org/10.2202/1524-5861.1309.
Abstract (sommario):
This article provides a comprehensive look at the area of privatization in Poland. It provides a context and discusses the two major forces that have spurred the privatization process, as well as privatizations carried out in developing countries under the auspices of the World Bank and the IMF.The article begins with an explanation of the background to privatization in the context of state central planning, a discussion of the derivative traits of the command-and-control economy, the collapse of the system in the 1990s, the actions necessitated in society in an attempt to reform and change the system, and the reform strategies that were implement as a response to both the economic and political challenges.The article includes a discussion of the core objectives of the privatization process, the requirements of the privatization process, and an important section dealing with the actions that are necessary and complementary in preparing society and individual entities for privatization. The article concludes with an analysis of the models of privatization that were adopted in the region, along with tables delineating proceeds from privatization; the number of privatizations carried out both world-wide and in the region.
2
MUNIR, KAMAL, e NATALYA NAQVI. "Privatization in the Land of Believers: The political economy of privatization in Pakistan". Modern Asian Studies 51, n. 6 (novembre 2017): 1695–726. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0026749x16000585.
Abstract (sommario):
AbstractDespite theoretical justifications and empirical evidence that state-owned enterprises have played an important role in late development, as well as over three decades of evidence that privatization programmes since the 1980s have had mixed results at best, international financial institutions continue prescribing privatization as a panacea for developing countries. Pakistan is an interesting case to understand why privatization is still considered desirable, because it is one of a set of developing countries that have whole-heartedly implemented Washington Consensus policies. In this context, we analyse privatization in two key economic sectors in Pakistan: energy and banking. Using qualitative and quantitative data, we describe the motivations behind these privatizations, the process by which they were carried out, and analyse the post-privatization performance of these organizations and sectors. We find that in both cases (a) the privatizations failed not only with respect to their stated aims, leading to a decline in national productive capabilities, but also had adverse distributional consequences, shifting the rewards to the buyers while the risks and costs remained with the public sector, and (b) the suboptimal outcomes of the privatizations went largely unchallenged aided by a prevalent neoliberal view amongst the country's economic policy makers and intelligentsia. Our analysis sheds new light on the process by which privatization in the absence of a state with the capacity to discipline business interests has enabled these interests to obtain state-sponsored rents without bringing any of the associated benefits for economic development.
3
Musabelli, Erisa. "Public Enterprises Privatization,The Costs and Benefits (Albania Case)". European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research 1, n. 1 (1 maggio 2014): 118. http://dx.doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v1i1.p118-125.
Abstract (sommario):
Privatization is the process that transfers the ownership of an enterprise ,service agency or public asset to the private sector,from which ,essentisal positive.effects in the capital markets, financial assets and working groups, are expected. It affects the interests of different groups of the population and includes 80% of all the economic activities including the fields of energy, oil and gas, telecommunications, forests and waterways, roads and railways, ports and airports, rail and inland waterway. Over the past ten years a large amount of privatizations has been accomplished in Albania, indeed, many companies, institutions, societies, mines, which previously had been owned by the state, have now become private property.But does it affect the national economy in a positive or a negative way? Had the privatizations in our country been done in the right extent? in the process of economy's transformation, the emphasis is found in the structural reform, where one of the pillars that support these reforms is the process of privatization. This article will provide a detailed and an accurate situation of the development of this process in Albania, based on the assumption that "the privatization affects positively the state economy", what went right and what did not work properly, how can we take action in order to achieve an improvement? What are the costs and the benefits of the process of privatization in terms of macroeconomic, microeconomic and social aspects in Albania?
4
Ibraimi, Xhemazie. "Privatization in post-war Kosovo: Legal review". Journal of Governance and Regulation 11, n. 1 (2022): 112–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/jgrv11i1art11.
Abstract (sommario):
The main purpose of this paper is to analyze privatization in Kosovo as a complex legal process of redistribution of social wealth to private individuals or certain enterprises. The privatization process in Kosovo cannot be compared with the privatizations of countries in the region due to its economic and political specifics, as a country with economies in transition and high levels of corruption (Borošak, 2018). To study this phenomenon, we will analyze the data published by the complaints received from the Kosovo Trust Agency (KTA) the decisions of the Special Chamber as well as the judgments of the Special Chamber for human rights. Data analysis concludes on descriptive statistics, analysis of domestic laws, and regulations of the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK), reports from the World Bank, processed cases, and Special Chamber court decisions on privatizations. The study concludes that the process of privatization of socially owned property has caused conflicts between the descendants as property owners before their confiscation, privatization has further destroyed the country’s economic development rather than improving the well-being and lives of its citizens. This paper is of great importance for policy makers, officials, scholars as the processing, publication of data, and sanctioning will enable this phenomenon that has become a new way of enrichment to be stopped and the state to be built for society and to belong to society.
5
Pomeranz, Felix. "PRIVATIZATION AND THE ETHICS OF ISLAM". American Journal of Islam and Society 14, n. 2 (1 luglio 1997): 264–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v14i2.2243.
Abstract (sommario):
Current privatization efforts dwarf all which have gone before. In general,the “less developed” nations, including peoples of the Muslim faith,seem to have attracted the advocates of privatization. Disturbing resultsare obtained when the substance and process of privatization are juxtaposedto the teaching of Islam.In certain cases, privatization may result in the transfer of wealth fromrelatively weak hands (i.e., from the debtor governments of the lessdeveloped nations) to relatively strong hands (i.e., consortia of intemationalentrepreneurs). Islam teaches the opposite: It recognizes the rightof the less able in the wealth of those who have greater ability or theopportunity to produce greater wealth (Mirakhor, 1989).The outcomes of privatization are important to peace and security.Consequently, the emergence of privatization as a cat’s paw in politicaldiscourse is not a good omen. For example, Abdelhak Benhamouda,Algeria’s labor leader, “opposes any privatizations undertaken on the‘back‘ of the workers and demanded (sic) ‘guarantees’ from the govemment”(AFX News, 1995).The article defines privatization and discusses its structural and operationalproblems in light of religious imperatives ...
6
Aliu, Ing Florin. "Privatization Process in Kosovo". ILIRIA International Review 4, n. 1 (30 giugno 2014): 151. http://dx.doi.org/10.21113/iir.v4i1.58.
Abstract (sommario):
Privatization is considered an initial step toward market economy, restructuring financial and economic sector that enables competition in the economy. Privatization is the most painful process in economy where beside legal establishment and political will, it includes also the aspect of fairness and honesty. Analysis of this process is based on the models and comparisons between Kosovo and countries of central and Eastern Europe, in order to give a clearer picture on the overall process of privatization in KosovoMethodology that is used to analyze this issue is based on empirical results and also qualitative interpretation of the models and also on studying particular asset privatization process. A widely discussed case of privatization in Kosovo is that of Post and Telecom of Kosovo (PTK). Since each company has its own value, I have focused my appraising analysis on the financial statements with a special observation on Cash Flow from Operation, as the most significant indicator on showing how company is using her physical and human recourses to generate money. I have based my research on using methodology of discounted cash flow from operation analysis, even though the company valuation was done using net cash flow from operation analysis. Cash Flow valuation then was discounted by the T-bonds interest rate.This paper tries to bring a conclusion that privatization process in Kosovo have not brought the results excepted, firstly by setting an inappropriate price of assets and lastly by restructuring overall privatization sector and the overall industry. Kosovo, consequently, lost a big opportunity to create a competitive environment of financial industry: starting from the banking industry followed the pension trust which remained at their initial steps of development
7
Papadopoulos, Thomas. "Building the Legal Framework of Privatizations in Cyprus: The Missing Link with Sustainable Development". European Business Law Review 29, Issue 6 (1 dicembre 2018): 997–1020. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/eulr2018039.
Abstract (sommario):
This article presents and scrutinizes the Privatizations Law of the Republic of Cyprus, in the context of sustainable development. Cyprus was another victim of the Eurozone crisis. A bailout agreement was reached between Cyprus and its creditors. This bailout agreement was accompanied by a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on specific Economic Policy Conditionality requiring certain reforms. The Cyprus MoU required, among others, privatizations of certain State-owned enterprises. In 2014, Cyprus adopt ed the Privatizations Law stipulating the details of the privatization process. This article presents and discusses the most important aspects of this Law. A critical overview of the legal framework of privatizations is provided in the context of sustainable development. The contribution of this privatization procedure to sustainable development is examined. More specifically, the absence of sustainable development from the Privatizations Law is criticized. This article sheds light on the relationship between the privatized enterprises and sustainable development. Certain proposals in the light of the golden shares case law of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) are made. It is argued that sustainable development could be pursued through golden shares in privatized enterprises. Proposals for the inclusion of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in privatized enterprises are brought forward. This article also considers various challenges to the privatization programme of Cyprus.
8
Radygin, A. "The Privatization Process in Russia in 1995 General dynamics of the privatization process". Problems of Economic Transition 39, n. 7 (1 novembre 1996): 5–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/pet1061-199139075.
9
BOUKARAOUN, Hacene. "THE PRIVATIZATION PROCESS IN ALGERIA". Developing Economies 29, n. 2 (giugno 1991): 89–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1049.1991.tb00202.x.
10
Hite, James. "Rural Development, Privatization and Public Choice: Substance Depends upon Process". Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 25, n. 1 (luglio 1993): 89–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1074070800018642.
Abstract (sommario):
AbstractWhether or not privatization facilitates rural development depends upon what rural development means. In practice, rural development often is the result of a struggle between rent defenders and rent seekers. A positivist concept of rural development is proposed, and the institutions of public choice are examined to determine how they might influence privatization decisions. The conclusion is that whether or not privatization improves efficiency of adjustment in rural economies depends upon the specifics of political deals required to achieve a particular act of privatization.
11
Vujacic, Ivan, e Jelica Petrovic-Vujacic. "Privatization in Serbia: Results and institutional failures". Ekonomski anali 56, n. 191 (2011): 89–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/eka1191089v.
Abstract (sommario):
Since the beginning of the 1990?s several models of privatization have been applied in Serbia. While much was written concerning the models themselves at the time of their application, remarkably little has been written in regards to the assessment of their implementation over the last decade. The paper investigates the scope, types, and results, with an emphasis on this time period. Given that the official failure rate of privatizations undertaken is around one in four, the paper focuses on the weaknesses of the legal and economic aspects of the model, the weaknesses of the privatization implementation, and the weaknesses in the monitoring of the privatization process. Another focus is on the inadequate attention paid to the need for institutional coherence, which led to results that were not in accord with the goals set out. The paper will also point out the areas of further research that, in the opinion of the authors, should be undertaken in order to come to an assessment of privatization as the central and most important aspect of the transition.
12
Kalandadze, Levan. "The Issues of Real Estate Valuation in the Process of Privatization". Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management 5, n. 1 (27 novembre 2017): 201–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bjreecm-2017-0015.
Abstract (sommario):
Abstract The process of privatization in our country was characterized and unfortunately is still characterized by very important difficulties. The purpose of the research is to analyze the issues of real estate valuation in the process of privatization. In Georgia, the privatization process began after dissolution of the Soviet system. It should be noted that the process of privatization is of particular importance in terms of activation of investment activities in the country. In this regard, privatization can be considered one of the essential and most important incentives for attracting investments by the state. Currently, thousands of enterprises have already been privatized, but there are still quite many stateowned production facilities and property. Determination of the market value of the items of state-owned property is especially important when selling them at auctions or on competitive basis. In addition, one of the causes for incompetent privatization of the state-owned property at the early stage is disregard of the institute of appraisers of movable and immovable property, who did not participate in determining the market value of the property and in the privatization process. The information assessment, analysis, comparison and generalization, as well as systematic, quantitative, qualitative and logical generalization methods are used in the article.
13
Pantić, Nemanja, Irena Milojević e Andrej Mićović. "Management analysis of the opportunities of managing the privatization process". Tehnika 75, n. 4 (2020): 493–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/tehnika2004493p.
Abstract (sommario):
The transformation of ownership, often reminiscent of the earlier historical period of the original accumulation of capital, is an opportunity for the rapid enrichment of those who had a monopoly in former socialist societies. At the same time, the redistribution of national wealth encourages changes in the relationship of forces in the social structure of power, which makes privatization the scene of sharp conflicts of interest with controversial consequences for the entire society. Weak institutions of the rule of law cannot limit the aspirations of different interest groups to gain economic power, so privatization is an area of great economic risk. That is why the greatest attention of both the public and specialized non-governmental organizations in the EU candidate countries is devoted to monitoring the privatization process. The paper aims to point out the basic features of the privatization process in Serbia. In this regard, we have analyzed the cause and effect relationships of the economic phenomena associated with this process, that is, we have pointed out the fact that certain legal provisions also contribute to the spread of abuses in this area. The importance of transparency in the privatization process, as an important precondition for economic growth and democratic transformation, was particularly emphasized.
14
Çildir, Melih. "Privatization in the World and in Turkey from the Past to the Present". International Journal of Social, Political and Economic Research 7, n. 2 (2 giugno 2020): 324–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.46291/ijospervol7iss2pp324-340.
Abstract (sommario):
From ancient Greece to the Renaissance period, up to privatization, which showed the effect on both Britain from Nazi Germany it emerges both in and outside Turkey. In this study the historical process of privatization in the world and in Turkey, the process of privatization, privatization has been mentioned in the domain. The first arrangement made in 1984 on privatization in Turkey, privatization, which began in 1986, the species, in taking the scope of privatization of SOEs No. 233 Decree, and for compatibility with the Constitution on 2018 703 Decree Law No. 85 Amendments to Article It was mentioned that the privatization authority was given to the President. The aims, benefits and disadvantages of privatization have been addressed using the current figures and data. This process was tried to be revealed by making a literature review.
15
Filić, Miloš. "Criminal analysis of the offense: Abuse in the privatization process". Pravo - teorija i praksa 40, n. 2 (2023): 138–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/ptp2302138f.
Abstract (sommario):
Compatibility with the standards of the European Union in terms of the criminal law regulation of all offenses that disrupt economic flows and values in a country, greatly affects, among the other things, the stability of economy as a basic social activity. The consequences of all individual criminal acts can have a very strong impact on certain aspects of economic relations. Comprehensive criminal regulation does a lot in the field of economic stability. Bearing in mind the topic of this paper, after a brief theoretical overview of the concept of privatization, the paper provides a criminological overview of the causes and forms of criminal behavior in the privatization process, as well as a criminal law analysis of the criminal act of Abuse in the privatization process. Abuse in the privatization process is a criminal offense regulated by the Article 228a of the Criminal Code of Republic of Serbia (2005), and it is classified in the twenty-second chapter entitled "Criminal offenses against economy". The criminal act of Abuse in the privatization process belongs to criminal acts violating the rules of legal business operations.
16
Myant, Martin. "The privatization process in central Europe". International Affairs 70, n. 4 (ottobre 1994): 814. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2624629.
17
Moskoff, William, Roman Frydman, Andrzej Rapaczynski e John S. Earle. "The Privatization Process in Central Europe". Russian Review 53, n. 4 (ottobre 1994): 603. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/131006.
18
Suimenko, Evgenii I. "Social Tension in the Privatization Process". Sociological Research 39, n. 6 (novembre 2000): 36–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/sor1061-0154390636.
19
Cooper, Richard, e Roman Frydman. "The Privatization Process in Central Europe". Foreign Affairs 73, n. 2 (1994): 145. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20045940.
20
Roberts, Alasdair S. "The privatization process: A worldwide perspective". Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 16, n. 2 (1997): 322–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1520-6688(199721)16:2<322::aid-pam12>3.0.co;2-l.
21
Cutler, Mary M. "The Privatization Process: A Natural Order Or Shock Therapy?" Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR) 14, n. 1 (1 settembre 2011): 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v14i1.5724.
Abstract (sommario):
<span>McKinnon (1991) argues that there is a natural order of economic liberalization and privatization. Sachs (1990) and Becker (1995) argue that the value of speed is so important it outweighs the value of waiting to discover the optional sequence. This paper investigates the question of order as it specifically applies to privatization of the industrial and financial sectors. Empirical evidence indicates that, while order is important, simultaneous change provides the necessary order. In this case, there is, in fact, no conflict between the natural order case and the shock therapy argument. A quick leap, the simultaneous privatization of the industrial and financial sectors, provides the necessary order.</span>
22
Druzic, Ivo, e Tomislav Gel. "SWOT analysis & privatization in Croatia". Ekonomski anali 51, n. 168 (2006): 121–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/eka0668121d.
Abstract (sommario):
Legal framework for privatization in Croatia was based on two key laws: the Transformation Act of 1991, and the Privatization Act of 1993, amended in 1996. Early start of privatization process in 1990s in Croatia was marked by the transformation of socially-owned companies into stock holding companies or limited liability companies. The first step (1991-1993) of this process of almost 2700 companies which entered privatization was their evaluation and transformation into private ownership entities. The second step (1994- 1997) consisted of privatization of CPF portfolio. The portfolios change constantly, not only as a result of privatization but also because companies themselves change, as does their position in the market. The third step (1998) in the privatization process was voucher privatization. Privatization of large infrastructure and utility companies designated as public enterprises began in 1999 (Croatian Telecom) and INA in 2002 (public enterprises are privatized on the basis of separate laws). Attempts to discuss privatization in Croatia in terms of SWOT analysis have been motivated by the stark difference among Croatian professional economists in an appraisal of Croatia's performance during the transition process in general and of the privatization process in particular. Therefore we considered the elements of SWOT analysis to be an acceptable way to delve into the confusing world of bickering arguments on the state and perspective of the Croatia's privatization process. In this paper we have tried to provide an impartial approach by employing two criteria i.e. strength and weaknesses in judging the events and results of the privatization process in Croatia. Strength of the overall privatization process can be mostly ascribed to the institutional swiftness on micro as well as on macro level. On the micro level 80% of the companies were formally privatized in the first two years despite unfavorable external conditions comprising the economic consequences of war. On the macro level it took approximately three years to restructure and downsize CPF majority ownership in 2700 companies to majority ownership in just 70 companies. Overall weakness of the restructuring process is concentrated in a painfully slow emergence of sound business activity in market environment. The economic inefficiency of this model is reflected in the substitution of modern entrepreneurial capitalism, which was hoped for with retrograde rent seeking capitalism, typical of early capitalism in its transition from a feudal to an industrial environment two centuries ago. Instead of efficiency and development, it is characterized by the drain of liquid capital through inflated debts, false reserves and falsified claims and the tunneling of constant capital through "soft" loans into tax havens outside the country. Therefore, the solution is not to deal with the consequences, which are evident in various affairs that are treated as individual deviations of the more or less good model of privatization. The problem lies in the model itself.
23
Horaček, Jan, e Helena Nikolić. "Privatization in Croatia: Standpoint of Croatian Citizens in 1998 and 2018". Business Systems Research Journal 12, n. 1 (1 maggio 2021): 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2021-0001.
Abstract (sommario):
Abstract Background: The break-up of Yugoslavia has led to a transition from planned to the market economy. The main task of transition is privatization, which implies transferring most of the former social ownership to private individuals. The privatization process has marked the end of the twentieth century in Croatia and still carries many unanswered questions that have arisen because of the persistent need for privatization in the former, unconsolidated state. Objectives: The main objective of the paper is to make a comparison of respondents’ perception of Croatian privatization in 2018 compared to 1998. The aim is to investigate the similarities and changes in the attitudes of the Croats regarding the privatization processes that Croatia has engulfed in several stages. Methods/Approach: The survey was conducted on a sample of one hundred Croatian citizens about their perception of the privatization process in Croatia in 2018. Results of the survey in 1998 and 2018 were compared using the chi-square test. Results: The respondents in 2018 are convinced that the main goals of privatization have not been realized. Citizens’ distrust towards the system and institutions conducting the privatization process is greater in 2018 compared to 1998. Conclusions: Respondents perception of privatization has not changed significantly concerning the 20-year gap. Dissatisfaction due to the unfulfilled fundamental goals is still present, as is the need for revision of privatization.
24
Cengiz, Doruk. "Total Effects of Privatization: Evidence from Turkey". Review of Radical Political Economics 50, n. 4 (24 settembre 2018): 699–707. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0486613418785031.
Abstract (sommario):
I examine effects of the privatization process as a whole in Turkey. I show that the privatization process begins before the firm is sold to private agents. I find that privatization causes the firm-level workforce to decline by 65 percent, profit-margin to increase by 18 percent, and no substantial changes in real sales. Based on the evidence presented, I conclude that the direct outcome of privatization is an income transfer from wage earners to profit earners. JEL Classification: L33, H42
25
Teles, André Correa, e Murillo de Oliveira Dias. "Does The Privatization Worth It? Factors Influencing the Quality of the Brazilian Privatization". British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies 4, n. 1 (3 febbraio 2023): 51–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0106.
Abstract (sommario):
The state's economic participation has been intensely debated over the past three decades. In Brazil, especially after the advent of the Federal Constitution of 1988. Privatization in Brazil, however, was instituted by Law 8.130/90, which instituted the National Privatization Plan, aiming to transfer to the private sector activities improperly exploited by the public sector. This article investigates the quality of services provided by privatized companies or public concessions through interviews. The main conclusions indicated a complex privatization process, as there is evidence related to five topics: (i) oversight, (ii) quality in privatization, (iii) regulation, (iv) competition, and (v) public service. In addition, the careful analysis suggested implications for the privatization process and public concessions. In addition, implications for the public administration to focus its efforts on improving oversight and scheduling itself in pre-regulating the privatization process. Finally, free competition aimed at competitiveness and low prices are topics to be discussed in this article.
26
Gupta, Muskan. "Privatization in India". International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology 10, n. 2 (28 febbraio 2022): 123–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2022.40200.
Abstract (sommario):
Abstract: Privatization generally is defined as the process of transfer of ownership, it can also be permanent or just for the years for which a particular contracted has been drafted between the parties. It is basically a route from public ownership to private ownership. On the other side it is also a strategy that provides advantage to a few at the price of many. In the 1960's and 1970's academicians, economists and politicians favored state ownership over personal possession within the production and provision of products and services. By the tip of the 1980's, however, there was a reversal of public policy from state domination of the assembly and provision of products and services to non-public ownership and operation. This was due partly to what the globe Bank observed as “state failure”, that was characterized by inefficient service delivery, unprofitable SOEs, high government debt, and stagnant economic process rates. Consequently, privatization caught on in several countries as a policy tool to foster potency, encourage investment, free public resources for investment in infrastructure and social programs to boost economic process and spatial arrangement equity. This paper also discusses the causes and reasons for privatization to happen in India and what are its pros and cons.
27
Davis, Colin. "The Politics of Ports: Privatization and the World's Ports". International Labor and Working-Class History 71, n. 1 (2007): 154–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0147547907000385.
Abstract (sommario):
AbstractThe recent controversy over a foreign-owned company running a US port brought attention to the creeping privatization of work in ports worldwide. Since the 1980s, there has been a head-long rush to privatize ports. The pace can be best described as rapid and chaotic. For some economists privatization is seen as a method to increase efficiency. But the process has substantial critics. For many privatization is perceived as problematic. There is evidence that the process does not indeed lead to savings and greater efficiency. Instead, the process has been haphazard and far from uniform in its application. Even where there is an entrenched presence, savings from privatization have yet to be realized. Others have made the point that the process cannot be transferred to ports in the developing world. That is, the multiplicity of ports and transportation problems in the interior make privatization more like wishful thinking than a policy that can work.
28
Boufi, Garmiya. "طرق وإج ا رءات خوصصة البنوك والآثار الناجمة عنها - د ا رسة تجربة فرنسا، مصر والج ا زئر-". Finance and Business Economies Review 2, n. 2 (30 giugno 2018): 463–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.58205/fber.v2i2.1590.
Abstract (sommario):
the public sector transformed into private sector or what is called “privatization”, It isone of the most remarkable global changes of the advanced and developing worldeconomies during the two last decades of the twentieth century.The privatization realized a great success in advanced countries while developing andArabic countries kept slowly advancing in crucial decisions taking concerning banksprivatization. Indeed, the privatization process in these countries requires the obligationto qualify and adapt banks by restructuring which is considered as an essential basis fordeveloping banks and adapting them to perform the privatization process
29
Azpiazu, Daniel, e Adolfo Vispo. "Some lessons of the Argentine privatization process". CEPAL Review 1994, n. 54 (31 dicembre 1994): 129–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.18356/8a5db1af-en.
30
Costa, Renato Lopes da, Marta Correria Sampaio e Isabel Miguel. "Privatization Process and Talent Management in Angola". Journal of Reviews on Global Economics 8 (14 febbraio 2019): 167–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.16.
31
Şahin, Sevgi Balkan. "Privatization as a Hegemonic Process in Turkey". Journal of Contemporary European Studies 18, n. 4 (dicembre 2010): 483–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2010.535711.
32
Marangos *, John. "Modelling the privatization process in transition economies". Oxford Development Studies 32, n. 4 (dicembre 2004): 585–604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1360081042000293353.
33
Michailov, Snejina. "The Bulgarian Experience in the Privatization Process". Eastern European Economics 35, n. 3 (maggio 1997): 75–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00128775.1997.11648626.
34
Simić, Nataša, Vesna Petrović e Dušan Aničić. "Investment funds and privatization process in Serbia". Journal of Process Management. New Technologies 7, n. 4 (2019): 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/jouproman7-21283.
35
Han, Xiaolu. "Study on Government Regulation in the Process of Privatization of Public Services". Journal of Theory and Practice of Social Science 3, n. 10 (31 ottobre 2023): 63–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.53469/jtpss.2023.03(10).10.
Abstract (sommario):
Our government gradually implemented the privatization reform in the field of public services in the early 1990s, although the time is relatively short, but it can not be denied that the reform has shown us the effect of a new way of government governance. We cannot deny the benefits brought by the privatization of public services, but in the process of implementation, there are still some problems in the transformation of the government's functions, and in terms of regulation, the government needs to think from a holistic perspective and recognize the shortcomings of the current system. This paper focuses on the government's regulatory role in the privatization of public services, looks for loopholes in the regulatory system and the causes of various problems, and makes recommendations.
36
Vujacic, Ivan, e Jelica Petrovic-Vujacic. "Privatization in Serbia - an assesment before the last round". Ekonomski anali 61, n. 209 (2016): 45–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/eka1609045v.
Abstract (sommario):
Serbia has had a long history of privatization. It commenced in 1990 and was only fully completed, as defined by the privatization legislation, in 2015. The reasons for this are many and complex and the paper provides a short historical overview. Privatization, however, began in earnest after the democratic revolution of 2000 and the paper analyses the political motives behind the adoption of the current model. The paper goes on to explain the model design, as well as its dynamics and results. The analysis probes more deeply into the specific weaknesses of auction implementation, showing that an alternative approach could have produced better results in terms of revenue. The specific institutional flaws that led to a high failure rate in the privatization of companies are identified and analysed. These weaknesses lie in the design, implementation, and monitoring, which led to results that were not in line with the goals of the privatization process. The designers of the privatization model gave scant attention to broader institutional coherence, which enabled largescale manipulation of the process. In some cases this enabled motives unrelated to the future of the firm being privatized to dominate the process. Finally, the scope of the last round of privatization in Serbia, which commenced in June 2015, and the probable results are discussed.
37
Issaoui, Fakhri, Zaher Meshari Abderrahim, Majed Bin Othayman e Slah Slimani. "Does the Concept of Property Rights Hold Relevance for Human Resource Performance?" International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals 15, n. 1 (9 aprile 2024): 1–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijhcitp.342088.
Abstract (sommario):
In a world where information technologies (ITs) are globalizing and acting directly and explicitly on organizations, the question of property rights neutrality becomes strategic. In this study, the authors investigated whether ownership is a determinant of human resource performance or whether it is driven by factors other than ownership (e.g., technology and IT). Thus, the major objective of this research was to find out under what conditions ownership exerts a nonneutral effect on the performance of human resources and whether these effects are dependent on the technological aspects of organizations. The authors' methodology included two techniques, namely, nonparametric tests applied to the main indicators of 21 privatized companies (operating in the IT and other sectors) in the Tunisian case, and panel data to explain the impact of privatizations on human resources. The results showed that the privatization process has allowed an improvement in productivity indicators through an increase in incentive systems, particularly for companies with high technological content. The application of the econometric technique evidenced a whole policy of restructuring the allocation of human resources, in the postprivatization period. This makes sense because the incentive system of newly privatized companies strived to be more efficient. Furthermore, the second model showed that human resource dynamics after privatization depends on the business cycle and the nature of investors and IT. The third model confirmed the idea that privatization leads to an improvement in the workforce and its productivity in the long term. Overall, the study generated important managerial implications, the most important of which is that privatization can only generate a positive effect on human resource performance when employees feel involved in the process and as much as the organization is involved in new ITs.
38
Grzywiński, Witold, Joanna Skonieczna, Tomasz Jelonek e Arkadiusz Tomczak. "The Influence of the Privatization Process on Accident Rates in the Forestry Sector in Poland". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, n. 9 (28 aprile 2020): 3055. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093055.
Abstract (sommario):
The aim of this paper is to analyze the changes in accident rates resulting from the privatization of forest operations. Data from the years 1990–2017 were obtained from the Statistical Forestry Yearbooks issued by Statistics Poland, and were analyzed for two periods: the time of intensive privatization (1991–2002) and the post-privatization period (2003–2017). The data from 1990 were treated as a benchmark. There were 14,626 accidents in total, of which 236 (1.61%) were fatal. The non-fatal accident rate in the whole forestry industry showed a decreasing trend in the study period (t = 2.27, p < 0.05). In the case of the fatal accident rate we can observe an upward trend; in the period of intensive privatization the average annual fatality rate was 0.11, and after privatization it was 0.18 (t = −2.68, p < 0.05). In both periods the fatality rate was twice as high in the private forestry sector as in the public sector. The number of working days lost declined in the public sector and increased in the private sector. An accident in the private sector resulted in 20 days’ longer absence than one in the public sector. The study confirms that despite economic transition, accident rates in Polish forestry remain a serious issue. The main problem to be addressed is the increase in the fatal accident rate, especially in the private sector.
39
Lis, Piotr, e Sławomir Zwierzchlewski. "The concepts of privatization of state-owned enterprises and public housing stock in Poland : similarities and differences". Economics and Business Review 6, n. 2 (30 dicembre 2006): 25–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2006.2.530.
Abstract (sommario):
Privatization of the Polish economy highlighted many problems concerning mostly the concepts of the process. This work attempts to make a review of the main aspects of privatization in Poland on the basis of state-owned enterprises and public housing stock. The authors indicate similarities and differences in privatization of the given resources with regard to the motives and dilemmas, scope of state intervention, techniques, equivalence of sale prices to the market value, and general consequences of this process. The conclusion of this work is that despite some common motives for the privatization of property in Poland, one can list significant differences with respect to the indicated resources. (original abstract)
40
CHEREYEVA, Bakhytgul Tulegenovna, Olga Ivanovna MALYARENKO, Gulder Ivanovna ABAYEVA, Olga Iosifovna MAYER e Tatyana Kenzhebekovna OSTRYANINA. "Analysis of the State Ownership Realization Process on the Example of Kazakhstan". Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 10, n. 4 (30 giugno 2019): 1013. http://dx.doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v10.4(42).03.
Abstract (sommario):
The research sets out the theoretical and methodological foundations of state property management. The use of privatization as the main tool for managing the public sector of the economy is shown, as a proof of which, a review of studies on reforming the economies of various countries is carried out, the main methodology and the results are shown. The authors chose a dynamically developing country of the post-socialist space as an object of research, where an unsuccessful attempt to reform the public sector has already been made, and today, the second one is being conducted. The study uses statistical data from 1991-2004 and 2014-2018, in the context of two periods of privatization of Kazakhstan. The authors give preliminary results of the current reform of the privatization of property and give alternative ways to reduce the public sector of the economy. It is concluded that the problem of quantitative and qualitative growth of the public sector can be solved not only through privatization, but also by maintaining restrictions and requirements on state-owned companies. In the end, this will lead to the promotion of healthy competition; improving the investment climate; increasing business activity and labor productivity, which is so necessary for countries with developing economies.
41
Santos, Liliam dos Reis Souza. "PRIVATIZAÇÃO DE FUNÇÕES SOCIAIS DO ESTADO BRASILEIRO: estudo a partir da política pública de saúde". Revista de Políticas Públicas 25, n. 2 (13 gennaio 2022): 950. http://dx.doi.org/10.18764/2178-2865.v25n2p950-964.
Abstract (sommario):
O artigo aborda a privatização das funções sociais do Estado brasileiro a partir da terceirização da gestão de serviços públicos de saúde. Faz um debate teórico sobre o Estado e sua relação de unidade dialética orgânica ao capitalismo; mostra as bases legais dessas modalidades de gestão e da contrarreforma da saúde no Brasil; traz dados sobre a prevalência dessas entidades no Brasil e dos elementos que evidenciam a privatização. Assevera que esse processo solapa as pretensões públicas do Estado e mostranovo meio de apropriação da riqueza coletiva pelo capital.PRIVATIZATION OF SOCIAL FUNCTIONS OF THE BRAZILIAN STATE: a study based on public health policyAbstractIt addresses the privatization of the Brazilian State's social functions through the outsourcing of the management of public health services. It makes a theoretical debate about the State and its relation of the organic dialectical unity with the capitalism; presents the legal bases of these modalities of health management and counter-reform in Brazil; brings data onthe prevalence of these entities in Brazil and the numbers that show privatizations. It states that this process submits the public intentions of the State and shows a new way of appropriating collective wealth by capital.Keywords: State; Privatization; Health policy.
42
Petrenko, G., e L. Kovalchuk. "Great privatization procedure: comparative and legal aspect". Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law, n. 70 (18 giugno 2022): 266–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2022.70.41.
Abstract (sommario):
The article is devoted to the coverage of one of the most important problems of our time - the process of major privatization. As a result of the analysis of legislation defined that the privatization of state or municipal property - a paid alienation of property in state or municipal ownership, in favor of individuals and legal entities, and also established that the attribution of property to objects of major privatization is based on their value, which should exceed 250 million hryvnia.
The main purpose of privatization is to accelerate economic growth, attract foreign and domestic investment, reduce the share of state or municipal property in the structure of the Ukrainian economy by selling privatization objects to the effective private owner. However, it is pointed out that the very procedure of privatization is to fill the country’s budget by transferring the share of state or municipal property in the structure of the economy of Ukraine to a more efficient private management, so the purpose enshrined in the Law requires clarification taking into account the purpose and result that is inherent in privatization.
It is pointed out that the privatization process is carried out in accordance with a set of procedures established by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, enshrined in the decree «On Approval of the Sale of Large Objects of State Property Privatization. In addition, it is noted that to ensure effective results from the implementation of privatization requires compliance with the basic principles of privatization defined by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Based on the analysis of the experience of the legal basis of privatization in the UK, Spain, Poland and France, it is found that privatization in these countries is carried out by a clear regulatory consolidation of the procedure for privatization and under increased control of the relevant government agencies. It is suggested to introduce the impartial control of officials of the State Property Fund of Ukraine at each stage of privatization and control by the state over the privatized objects in a given post-privatization period.
43
Ibadoglu (Bayramov), G. "Transformation of Forms of Property in Azerbaijan: The Results of the First Privatization". Voprosy Ekonomiki, n. 2 (20 febbraio 2003): 87–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2003-2-87-92.
Abstract (sommario):
The results of realization of the first privatization program are analyzed from two points of view: quantitative and qualitative. The efficiency of privatization is considered in different spheres. It is indicated that at the first stage of privatization its political and systemic goals were partially achieved, but economic and social ones seemed not to have been implemented. A number of conclusions aimed at further perfection of the process of privatization are formulated.
44
Dr. Chithambar Gupta V, Dr Virupaksha Goud G,, e Dr Aurobindo Kiriyakere, Dr. Sunil M Rashinkar. "Sustainable Privatization Framework with Special Reference to India and Emerging Democratic Economies". European Economic Letters (EEL) 14, n. 2 (31 maggio 2024): 1781–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.52783/eel.v14i2.1506.
Abstract (sommario):
Privatization, as a policy, faced lot of resistance and risks for government while privatizing state enterprises. Emerging democracies faces a relatively different challenges to privatization in comparison with developed countries. The success of privatization is different in different countries. The mammoth research on privatization rarely discussed the sustainability of privatization policy in the democratic system. In this context, this research would like to find an answer to what are the factors that influence sustainability of privatization? There exists a need for a holistic framework for sustainable and soft implementation of privatization plans. In this context, this research becomes highly relevant for such countries which are struggling in privatization of their state enterprises. This conceptual research article, is a qualitative research done, on emerging democratic economies, in an effort to identify the factors which influence sustainability of the privatization of public sector enterprises, using secondary literature. The proposed framework would like to answer the multidimensional external and internal challenges arising from politics, economy, stock market, society, labor unions, privatization process and method.
45
Zhang, Jianjun. "State Power, Elite Relations, and the Politics of Privatization in China's Rural Industry: Different Approaches in Two Regions". Asian Survey 48, n. 2 (marzo 2008): 215–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/as.2008.48.2.215.
Abstract (sommario):
Abstract By comparing ““manipulated”” privatization in Wuxi and relatively ““transparent”” privatization in Wenzhou, this paper analyzes the politics of privatization in Chinese rural industry. It argues that power relations between government and people, and elite relations between leaders and managers, determine who was included and who was excluded in the process.
46
HICKEY, Robert. "Postal privatization and the transformation of the global logistics industry". Management international 12, Spécial (2008): 39–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.59876/a-kep9-2npj.
Abstract (sommario):
The global trend to privatize and deregulate national postal services has grown rapidly in the past several years. The process of privatization of the US Postal Service presents an interesting case in which the world's largest national post has privatized significant portions of its collection and sortation network. This paper examines the influence of corporate interests and business strategies on the privatization process of the US postal sector. These changes are taking place in the context of transformative changes in the global logistics industry. Despite years of failed postal reform legislation, business strategies creating public-private partnerships have driven a unique form of postal privatization - one preferred by private businesses - privatization that constrains competition. [PUB ABSTRACT]
47
Schnitzer, Monika. "Privatisierung in Osteuropa: Strategien und Ergebnisse". Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 4, n. 3 (agosto 2003): 359–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2516.00129.
Abstract (sommario):
Abstract The privatization process in Eastern Europe has not been a success everywhere. The opinion of experts about the optimal privatization strategy has changed over the last decade. This article first presents the theoretical foundation for privatizing state-owned enterprises. It then discusses the pros and cons of different privatization strategies. As the examples of the Czech Republic and Russia show, privatization does not lead to enterprise restructuring if it is not accompanied by institutional reforms. Empirical studies confirm that the effects of privatization are very different in different regions, mostly positive in MOE countries, but not always so in CIS countries.
48
Zelic, Jovana. "The performance of Serbian enterprises after five waves of privatisation". Zbornik Matice srpske za drustvene nauke, n. 118-119 (2005): 185–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/zmsdn0519185z.
Abstract (sommario):
This paper deals with the impact privatization process has on the performance of Serbian enterprises. Since the most frequently quoted obstacle for good economic performance in the past is the delay in privatization process and enterprise restructuring, the present analysis might help in obtaining a better insight into the problems preventing the acceleration of growth rate in Serbia. Hence, the present work evaluates the relationship between different methods of privatization leading to different ownership structures and the performance of enterprises in Serbia.
49
DOYLE, DAVID. "Politics and Privatization: Exogenous pressures, domestic incentives and state divestiture in Latin America". Journal of Public Policy 30, n. 3 (4 novembre 2010): 291–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x10000127.
Abstract (sommario):
AbstractDespite a pervasive trend towards state retrenchment in Latin America since the 1980s, there remains significant variation in the levels of privatization across the region. However, very few cross-national studies of the determinants of privatization have been conducted and we still do not truly know why states privatize. This paper examines the determinants of privatization for 14 Latin American states over the period 1975 to 2003. I contend that privatization is best conceptualized as a two-stage process involving an initial decision to privatize, followed by a subsequent decision concerning the extent and intensity of privatization. In addition, privatization cannot be simply explained by either international or domestic level-variables. Rather, endogenous and exogenous variables will have different impacts at different stages of this process. The results of the statistical tests yield two important insights. Firstly, the initial decision to privatize is primarily shaped by international factors, in particular, international diffusion, while variation in the level of state divestiture across the region can primarily be explained by domestic economic and political conditions.
50
Yeboah-Assiamah, Emmanuel. "Involvement of private actors in the provision of urban sanitation services; potential challenges and precautions". Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 26, n. 2 (9 marzo 2015): 270–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/meq-08-2014-0130.
Abstract (sommario):
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to use relevant models and theories to conceptualize the prospects and challenges associated with private sector involvement in the provision of sanitation and environmental services in urban settlements of developing African economies. Design/methodology/approach – The study adopts the public choice theory and principal-agent model in its conceptualization and analysis. Retrospective literature analysis within the qualitative research approach has been employed for the study. It draws extensively on existing classical theoretical and current empirical literature on privatization of urban sanitation services in developing countries. Findings – The study observes that privatization is a necessary tool for enhancing quality and responsive sanitation service delivery but there must be some mechanisms to prevent any latent challenges. The study also observes that the same problems associated with the public sector could transcend into the private sector if key measures are not taken into consideration. Practical implications – The process of privatizing or contracting out must ensure competition, enough communication to all stakeholders as well as involving expertise in the bidding process. The process also requires strict monitoring and supervision; these call for an appropriate legal framework to regulate privatization. The paper reminds urban administrators and policy makers to be circumspect in the privatization process. If the process of privatization is carried out effectively, urban sanitation services will be provided effectively and efficiently. Originality/value – The paper adapts the public choice and principal-agent model to assess privatization processes in developing African countries. This study will be of importance to urban administrators, public officials and policy makers in general.