Letteratura scientifica selezionata sul tema "Philosophy and religion"
Cita una fonte nei formati APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard e in molti altri stili
Consulta la lista di attuali articoli, libri, tesi, atti di convegni e altre fonti scientifiche attinenti al tema "Philosophy and religion".
Accanto a ogni fonte nell'elenco di riferimenti c'è un pulsante "Aggiungi alla bibliografia". Premilo e genereremo automaticamente la citazione bibliografica dell'opera scelta nello stile citazionale di cui hai bisogno: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver ecc.
Puoi anche scaricare il testo completo della pubblicazione scientifica nel formato .pdf e leggere online l'abstract (il sommario) dell'opera se è presente nei metadati.
Articoli di riviste sul tema "Philosophy and religion"
Strenski, Ivan. "Philosophy of (Lived) Religion". Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 41, n. 1 (marzo 2012): 5–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0008429811430052.
Testo completoRennie, Bryan. "The History (and Philosophy) of Religions". Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 41, n. 1 (marzo 2012): 24–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0008429811430055.
Testo completoSchilbrack, Kevin. "New Directions for Philosophy of Religion: Four Proposals". Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 41, n. 1 (marzo 2012): 46–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0008429811430058.
Testo completoBello, Joathas Soares. "Philosophy of religion and religation". Synesis 5, n. 2 (2013): 85–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.14195/1984-6754_5-2_6.
Testo completoNeville, Robert Cummings. "Religions, philosophies, and philosophy of religion". International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 38, n. 1-3 (dicembre 1995): 165–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01322955.
Testo completoAllen, Diogenes. "IS Philosophy of Religion Enough?" Theology Today 44, n. 3 (ottobre 1987): 311–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004057368704400303.
Testo completoKazin, Aleksandar. "Russian religion and Russian philosophy". Zbornik Matice srpske za drustvene nauke, n. 152 (2015): 409–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/zmsdn1552409k.
Testo completoWood, William. "Leo Strauss on Religion as the Fundamental Alternative to Philosophy". Roczniki Filozoficzne 71, n. 2 (28 giugno 2023): 289–311. http://dx.doi.org/10.18290/rf237102.15.
Testo completoObitts, Stanley. "Philosophy of Religion". Faith and Philosophy 4, n. 2 (1987): 224–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/faithphil19874221.
Testo completoBleickert, Günter. "Philosophy of Religion". Philosophy and History 19, n. 1 (1986): 32–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/philhist198619119.
Testo completoTesi sul tema "Philosophy and religion"
Uhde, Bernhard. "Religions of Love? Reflections on religion and violence in the great monotheistic religions". Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú - Departamento de Humanidades, 2012. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/113086.
Testo completoLas grandes religiones monoteístas –Judaísmo, Cristianismo e Islam– coinciden en anunciar el amor de Dios a los hombres, y reclaman el amor de los hombres a Dios y al prójimo. Sin embargo, una breve mirada a la praxis de estas religiones hace dudar de si este amor no es una mera afirmación, mientras que en la historia y en el presente se impusieron y se imponen las pretensiones exclusivas de verdad mediante el ejercicio de la violencia en contra de los adeptos de la propia religión (internamente”) y, en especial, en contra de los seguidores de otras religiones (externamente”) para así alcanzar el poder político. Ahora bien, hay que distinguir entre el justo poder soberano de Dios y la violencia lesiva, además de que el poder soberano de Dios, al igual que el concepto de Dios, no es el mismo en las tres grandes religiones monoteístas. En el Judaísmo domina Dios con amor y como rey; en el Cristianismo, con amor y como servidor; en el Islam, con amor y majestad. Aunque siempre el poder soberano es exclusivo de Dios y nunca se desea la violencia lesiva entre los hombres. Solo así el poder es constitutivo de la naturaleza interna de la religión, mas no de la relación entre las religiones o de las religiones con el mundo: No hay coacción en la religión”.
Uhde, Bernhard. "Religions of Love? Reflections on Religion and Violence in the Great Monotheistic Religions". Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú - Departamento de Humanidades, 2013. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/113277.
Testo completoLas grandes religiones monoteístas -Judaísmo, Cristianismo e Islam coincidenen anunciar el amor de Dios a los hombres, y reclaman el amor de los hombres a Dios y al prójimo. Sin embargo, una breve mirada a la praxis de estas religiones hace dudar de si este amor no es una mera afirmación, mientras que en la historia y en el presente se impusieron y se imponen laspretensiones exclusivas de verdad mediante el ejercicio de la violencia encontra de los adeptos de la propia religión (internamente) y, en especial, encontra de los seguidores de otras religiones (externamente) para así alcanzar el poder político. Ahora bien, hay que distinguir entre el justo poder soberano de Dios y la violencia lesiva, además de que el poder soberano de Dios, al igual que el concepto de Dios, no es el mismo en las tres grandes religiones monoteístas. En el Judaísmo domina Dios con amor y como rey; en el Cristianismo, con amor y como servidor; en el Islam, con amor y majestad. Aunque siempre el poder soberano es exclusivo de Dios y nunca se desea la violencia lesiva entre los hombres. Solo así el poder es constitutivo de la naturaleza intema de la religión, mas no de la relación entre las religiones o de las religiones con el mundo: No hay coacción en la religión
Kanaris, Jim. "Bernard Lonergan's philosophy of religion". Thesis, McGill University, 2000. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=36772.
Testo completoMy point of departure is a period in Lonergan's thought where he attributes more to the influence of religious experience in our thinking than at any time prior in his career. In chapter 1 I pursue some reasons that have been given for the tardiness of his response, intimating its nature and what it meant for his controversial "proof" for God's existence. Something of a detour is taken in chapter 2 since discussion of the concept of religious experience in Lonergan must grapple with what he means by experience in general. I decipher three senses to the term integral to his concept of consciousness that I distinguish from a contemporary model, that of David Chalmers. Since Lonergan is emphatic about distinguishing consciousness from its concept I trace this aspect of his philosophical claim against the background of Kant and Hegel, his main dialogue partners on the question. In chapter 3 I return to the specifically religious dimension of the notion of experience in the early Lonergan. Here I track the development of his category of religious experience as it moves from the periphery to the explanatory basis of his thought. In chapter 4 the relevant later literature in Lonergan is examined in which is seen the emergence of what is technically philosophy of religion to him. Among the distinctions I introduce is the difference between his model of religion and what he calls his philosophy of religion. Conceiving it historically, I see the former, his model of religion, as the departure point for what in his philosophy of religion he sets out to accomplish. They are related, of course, but not one and the same thing. To avoid confusion with the field of the same name, I recommend that we refer to his philosophy of religion as it is literally, as a philosophy of religious studies, distinguishing it firstly from his philosophy of God and secondly from his model of religious experience.
Besides providing an unprecedented comprehensive understanding of Lonergan's philosophy of religion, outlining the matter this way also aids in identifying precisely what are the points of contact between Lonergan's thoughts on God and religion and the issues presently discussed by philosophers of religion. The conclusion offers an example of this at the level of "philosophy of," the formal component of Lonergan's philosophy of religion in the generic sense in which I understand it. It represents steps toward a larger project, which I adumbrate in the appendix.
Merklinger, Philip M. "Philosophy, theology, and Hegel's Berlin philosophy of religion, 1821-1827". Thesis, University of Ottawa (Canada), 1991. http://hdl.handle.net/10393/7593.
Testo completoLevene, David Samuel. "Religion in Livy". Thesis, University of Oxford, 1989. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.305051.
Testo completoRobert, Dominique 1950. "Humane bioethics : medicine, philosophy, religion and law". Thesis, McGill University, 2001. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=31531.
Testo completoCrowder, C. G. "Belief, unbelief and Wittgensteinian philosophy of religion". Thesis, Swansea University, 1993. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.636328.
Testo completoWodzinski, Phillip David. "Kant's Doctrine of Religion as Political Philosophy". Thesis, Boston College, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/2345/987.
Testo completoThrough a close reading of Immanuel Kant's late book, Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, the dissertation clarifies the political element in Kant's doctrine of religion and so contributes to a wider conception of his political philosophy. Kant's political philosophy of religion, in addition to extending and further animating his moral doctrine, interprets religion in such a way as to give the Christian faith a moral grounding that will make possible, and even be an agent of, the improvement of social and political life. The dissertation emphasizes the wholeness and structure of Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason as a book, for the teaching of the book is not exhausted by the articulation of its doctrine but also includes both the fact and the manner of its expression: the reader learns most fully from Kant by giving attention to the structure and tone of the book as well as to its stated content and argumentation. The Religion provides the basis not only for a proposed reenvisioning of the basis of existing religious creeds and practices, but along with this a devastating critique of them in particularly moral terms. This, however, is only half of what constitutes Kant's political philosophy of religion; Kant goes beyond the philosophical analysis of the social-political context of religion and pursues, alongside this effort, a political presentation of philosophy which is intended to relieve the reader's anxieties concerning the tension between philosophy and political life that it is in the interest of the partisans of the church-faith to encourage
Thesis (PhD) — Boston College, 2009
Submitted to: Boston College. Graduate School of Arts and Sciences
Discipline: Political Science
Chetelat, James Pierre. "Hegel's concept of religion". Thesis, McGill University, 2008. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=18726.
Testo completoJ'explore dans cette thèse la manière dont Hegel conçoit la pratique religieuse. Pour Hegel, la religion ne saurait être une relation entre un être transcendant et les humains puisque, ainsi que je le démontre, le dieu hégélien n'est pas un tel être transcendant mais plutôt la raison en tant qu'Idée et esprit. Il n'est pas non plus question pour Hegel de comprendre la religion comme le sentiment ou l'expérience immédiate du divin. Selon lui, la religion implique une connaissance de la vérité sous la forme d'une représentation. Mon propos à cet égard est de cerner les vérités qui, de son point de vue, sont communes à toutes les religions, et d'identifier le principe qui, selon lui, préside au développement des diverses religions déterminées qui culminent dans le christianisme. Mais, d'abord et avant tout, la religion est pour Hegel un culte ou une pratique par laquelle une personne surmonte de manière radicale sa propre particularité et s'identifie complètement au point de vue universel et objectif. En surmontant sa particularité, cette personne reconnaît que ses intérêts sont dépourvus de valeur absolue et accepte de les abandonner entièrement pour se soumettre aux exigences de l'universel. Selon Hegel, la forme la plus élevée du culte est une participation pleine et entière à la Sittlichkeit, ou à la vie sociale et culturelle de l'Europe protestante moderne. Le culte permet à celui qui y participe de parvenir à la liberté, but de la religion et valeur ultime dans la philosophie hégélienne. J'argumente que la liberté est pour Hegel une indépendance, tant active que passive, vis-à-vis du monde externe. En tant qu'elle est active, la liberté est l'autonomie qu'une personne possède lorsqu'elle agit rationnellement ou qu'elle se conforme aux normes éthiques qui constituent un moment nécessaire de son être-libre. En tant qu'elle est passive, la liberté est l'indépendance qu'une personne atteint lorsqu'elle s'est$
Rochard, Michelle A. "Kant's philosophy of religion : the relationship between Ecclesiastical faith and reasoned religion". Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1998. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/tape15/PQDD_0005/MQ39436.pdf.
Testo completoLibri sul tema "Philosophy and religion"
Wilfried, Schröder, a cura di. Natural science, philosophy, and religion =: Naturwissenschaft, Philosophie und Religion. [Bremen]: Science Edition, 2006.
Cerca il testo completoYandell, Keith E. Philosophy of Religion. London: Taylor & Francis Group Plc, 2004.
Cerca il testo completoMeister, Chad. Philosophy of Religion. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137314758.
Testo completoJ, Wainwright William, a cura di. Philosophy of religion. New York: Routledge, 2009.
Cerca il testo completoHick, John. Philosophy of religion. 4a ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall, 1990.
Cerca il testo completoA, French Peter, Uehling Theodore Edward e Wettstein Howard K, a cura di. Philosophy of religion. Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press, 1997.
Cerca il testo completo1917-, Devaraja N. K., e Indian Institute of Advanced Study., a cura di. Philosophy and religion. Shimla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study in association with Indus Pub. Co., 1989.
Cerca il testo completoMartin, Warner, a cura di. Religion and philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Cerca il testo completoGuttorm, Fløistad, a cura di. Philosophy of religion. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010.
Cerca il testo completoW, Perrett Roy, a cura di. Philosophy of religion. New York: Garland, 2000.
Cerca il testo completoCapitoli di libri sul tema "Philosophy and religion"
Greetham, Bryan. "Religion". In Philosophy, 154–67. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-72563-2_12.
Testo completoParekh, Bhikhu. "Philosophy of Religion". In Gandhi’s Political Philosophy, 65–84. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09248-2_4.
Testo completoDawes, Gregory W. "Philosophy and Religion". In Religion, Philosophy and Knowledge, 1–4. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43500-8_1.
Testo completoPeperzak, Adriaan. "Philosophy — religion — theology". In Issues in Contemporary Philosophy of Religion, 29–39. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0516-6_3.
Testo completoGeach, Peter. "Philosophy of Religion". In Peter Geach: Philosophical Encounters, 213–14. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7885-1_16.
Testo completoMorreall, John. "Philosophy and religion". In The Primer of Humor Research, 211–42. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110198492.211.
Testo completoXu, Guobin, Yanhui Chen e Lianhua Xu. "Philosophy and Religion". In Understanding Chinese Culture, 1–27. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8162-0_1.
Testo completoTaliaferro, Charles. "Philosophy of Religion". In The Blackwell Companion to the Study of Religion, 123–45. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781405168748.ch6.
Testo completoRandau, Henk R., e Olga Medinskaya. "Philosophy and Religion". In China Business 2.0, 205–6. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07677-5_39.
Testo completoBaggini, Julian, e Gareth Southwell. "Philosophy of Religion". In Philosophy: Key Themes, 120–46. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137008879_5.
Testo completoAtti di convegni sul tema "Philosophy and religion"
Khitruk, Ekaterina. "Публичное и частное в философии религии Ричарда Рорти". In The Public/Private in Modern Civilization, the 22nd Russian Scientific-Practical Conference (with international participation) (Yekaterinburg, April 16-17, 2020). Liberal Arts University – University for Humanities, Yekaterinburg, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.35853/ufh-public/private-2020-14.
Testo completoVisweswaran, HV. "Philosophy of India-Dravidology". In The Asian Conference on Ethics, Religion & Philosophy 202. The International Academic Forum(IAFOR), 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.22492/issn.2187-476x.2021.7.
Testo completoSasaki, Kei. "Life in Philosophy and Religion, and Beyond". In Annual International Conference on Philosophy: Yesterday, Today & Tomorrow (PYTT 2016). Global Science & Technology Forum (GSTF), 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.5176/2382-5677_pytt16.17.
Testo completoMacaraan, Willard Enrique R. "Exploring the Social Space of Filipino Catholics in Japan: [De]Ghettoization". In The Asian Conference on Ethics, Religion & Philosophy 2023. The International Academic Forum(IAFOR), 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.22492/issn.2187-476x.2023.6.
Testo completoLi, Chen-Mei, Li-Yueh Chen Andy e Kuo-Chin Shih. "Transcending Time and Space: The Social Practice of Weixin Shengjiao in Facing Global Ethical Responsibility". In The Asian Conference on Ethics, Religion & Philosophy 2023. The International Academic Forum(IAFOR), 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.22492/issn.2187-476x.2023.10.
Testo completoUsenco, Dmitry. "Polytheism and Monotheism: Mutually Exclusive or Interdependent?" In The Asian Conference on Ethics, Religion & Philosophy 2023. The International Academic Forum(IAFOR), 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.22492/issn.2187-476x.2023.1.
Testo completoCowie, Iain F. "Western Diplomacy’s Ineffective Iconoclasm: Conflict Resolution With China and the West’s Forgotten Rhetorical Tools". In The Asian Conference on Ethics, Religion & Philosophy 2023. The International Academic Forum(IAFOR), 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.22492/issn.2187-476x.2023.8.
Testo completoIwanaga, Yohei. "Mechanisms and Ethics of Sustainable Exchange: Interaction and Sympathy in Relationship Marketing". In The Asian Conference on Ethics, Religion & Philosophy 2023. The International Academic Forum(IAFOR), 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.22492/issn.2187-476x.2023.2.
Testo completoLi, Chen-Mei, Yu-Shan Yen e Meng-Chen Wu. "Lifelong Learning as a Key to the 21st Century: I Ching Education as an Example". In The Asian Conference on Ethics, Religion & Philosophy 2023. The International Academic Forum(IAFOR), 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.22492/issn.2187-476x.2023.11.
Testo completoShamoa-Nir, Lipaz. "Examining Dialogic Opportunities in Higher Education: Lessons Learned From Dialogue Courses for Jewish Students". In The Asian Conference on Ethics, Religion & Philosophy 2023. The International Academic Forum(IAFOR), 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.22492/issn.2187-476x.2023.5.
Testo completoRapporti di organizzazioni sul tema "Philosophy and religion"
HEFNER, Robert. IHSAN ETHICS AND POLITICAL REVITALIZATION Appreciating Muqtedar Khan’s Islam and Good Governance. IIIT, ottobre 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.47816/01.001.20.
Testo completoLyzanchuk, Vasyl. THE CHARITABLE ENERGY OF THE JOURNALISTIC WORD. Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, febbraio 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/vjo.2022.51.11415.
Testo completo