Articoli di riviste sul tema "Peer review of research grant proposals"
Cita una fonte nei formati APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard e in molti altri stili
Vedi i top-50 articoli di riviste per l'attività di ricerca sul tema "Peer review of research grant proposals".
Accanto a ogni fonte nell'elenco di riferimenti c'è un pulsante "Aggiungi alla bibliografia". Premilo e genereremo automaticamente la citazione bibliografica dell'opera scelta nello stile citazionale di cui hai bisogno: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver ecc.
Puoi anche scaricare il testo completo della pubblicazione scientifica nel formato .pdf e leggere online l'abstract (il sommario) dell'opera se è presente nei metadati.
Vedi gli articoli di riviste di molte aree scientifiche e compila una bibliografia corretta.
Lindquist, RD, MF Tracy e D. Treat-Jacobson. "Peer review of nursing research proposals". American Journal of Critical Care 4, n. 1 (1 gennaio 1995): 59–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.4037/ajcc1995.4.1.59.
Testo completoMarchant, Mary A. "The Keys to Preparing Successful Research Grant Proposals". Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 33, n. 3 (dicembre 2001): 605–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1074070800021040.
Testo completoConix, Stijn, Andreas De Block e Krist Vaesen. "Grant writing and grant peer review as questionable research practices". F1000Research 10 (8 novembre 2021): 1126. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73893.1.
Testo completoConix, Stijn, Andreas De Block e Krist Vaesen. "Grant writing and grant peer review as questionable research practices". F1000Research 10 (24 dicembre 2021): 1126. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73893.2.
Testo completoMutz, Rüdiger, Lutz Bornmann e Hans-Dieter Daniel. "Does Gender Matter in Grant Peer Review?" Zeitschrift für Psychologie 220, n. 2 (gennaio 2012): 121–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000103.
Testo completoBotham, Crystal M., Shay Brawn, Latishya Steele, Cisco B. Barrón, Sofie R. Kleppner e Daniel Herschlag. "Biosciences Proposal Bootcamp: Structured peer and faculty feedback improves trainees’ proposals and grantsmanship self-efficacy". PLOS ONE 15, n. 12 (28 dicembre 2020): e0243973. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243973.
Testo completoGallo, Stephen A., e Karen B. Schmaling. "Peer review: Risk and risk tolerance". PLOS ONE 17, n. 8 (26 agosto 2022): e0273813. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273813.
Testo completoFrampton, Geoff, Jonathan Shepherd, Karen Pickett e Jeremy Wyatt. "PP021 Peer Review Innovations For Grant Applications: Efficient And Effective?" International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 33, S1 (2017): 78–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266462317002124.
Testo completoGuthrie, Susan, Daniela Rodriguez Rincon, Gordon McInroy, Becky Ioppolo e Salil Gunashekar. "Measuring bias, burden and conservatism in research funding processes". F1000Research 8 (12 giugno 2019): 851. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.19156.1.
Testo completoFogelholm, Mikael, Saara Leppinen, Anssi Auvinen, Jani Raitanen, Anu Nuutinen e Kalervo Väänänen. "Panel discussion does not improve reliability of peer review for medical research grant proposals". Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 65, n. 1 (gennaio 2012): 47–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.05.001.
Testo completoRoumbanis, Lambros. "The oracles of science: On grant peer review and competitive funding". Social Science Information 60, n. 3 (5 luglio 2021): 356–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/05390184211019241.
Testo completoCerroni, Andrea. "Socio-cognitive perverse effects in peer review. Reflections and proposals". Journal of Science Communication 02, n. 03 (21 settembre 2003): F05. http://dx.doi.org/10.22323/2.02030905.
Testo completoDüzgüneş, Nejat. "‘Science by consensus’ impedes scientific creativity and progress: An alternative to funding biomedical research". F1000Research 11 (19 agosto 2022): 961. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.124082.1.
Testo completoDumanis, Sonya B., Lauren Ullrich, Patricia M. Washington e Patrick A. Forcelli. "It's Money! Real-World Grant Experience through a Student-Run, Peer-Reviewed Program". CBE—Life Sciences Education 12, n. 3 (settembre 2013): 419–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-05-0058.
Testo completoSeverin, Anna, Joao Martins, Rachel Heyard, François Delavy, Anne Jorstad e Matthias Egger. "Gender and other potential biases in peer review: cross-sectional analysis of 38 250 external peer review reports". BMJ Open 10, n. 8 (agosto 2020): e035058. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035058.
Testo completoCicchetti, Domenic V. "The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation". Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, n. 1 (marzo 1991): 119–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00065675.
Testo completoF. Recher, Harry. "Editorial Policy on Referees". Pacific Conservation Biology 5, n. 3 (1999): 162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/pc990162.
Testo completoNguyen, Quang Nhat. "Revisiting Peer Classroom Observations as A Teacher Professional Development Protocol: A Critical Theoretical Review of Global Practices". Vietnam Journal of Education 5, n. 2 (29 giugno 2021): 10–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.52296/vje.2021.71.
Testo completoMcDaniel, Andrew, Douglas R. Fullen, Kathleen R. Cho, David R. Lucas, Thomas J. Giordano, Joel Greenson, Andrew P. Lieberman, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Jeffrey L. Myers e Michael H. Roh. "Funding Anatomic Pathology Research: A Retrospective Analysis of an Intramural Funding Mechanism". Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 137, n. 9 (1 settembre 2013): 1270–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2012-0546-oa.
Testo completoPoole, Millicent E. "Reviewing for Research Excellence: Expectations, Procedures and Outcomes". Australian Journal of Education 37, n. 3 (novembre 1993): 219–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000494419303700301.
Testo completoTorres-Cintrón, Mariela, Margarita Irizarry-Ramírez e Harold Saavedra. "98729 Professional Development Core of the Hispanic Alliance for Clinical and Translational Research: a scientific productivity catalyst for underrepresented minorities (URM) in Clinical and Translational Research (CTR)". Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 5, s1 (marzo 2021): 65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.570.
Testo completoBloch, Sidney, e Garry Walter. "The Impact Factor: Time for Change". Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 35, n. 5 (ottobre 2001): 563–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0004867010060502.
Testo completoHaryadi, Haryadi, Citra Amalia, Doddy Teguh Yuwono, Fitri Amalia Sholehah e Santika Santika. "SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN SELEKSI BANTUAN DANA HIBAH PENELITIAN DENGAN METODE ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCE (ANP)". Jurnal Informatika dan Rekayasa Elektronik 4, n. 1 (19 aprile 2021): 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.36595/jire.v4i1.293.
Testo completoWarren, Andrea, Shilpa Constantinides, Edward Frongillo e Christine Blake. "Stakeholder Engagement Strategies for Policy and Programmatic Uptake: Lessons from the Drivers of Food Choice Competitive Grants Program". Current Developments in Nutrition 4, Supplement_2 (29 maggio 2020): 920. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzaa053_125.
Testo completoBayindir, Esra Eren, Mehmet Yigit Gurdal e Ismail Saglam. "A Game Theoretic Approach to Peer Review of Grant Proposals". Journal of Informetrics 13, n. 4 (novembre 2019): 100981. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.100981.
Testo completoPorter, Alan L., e Frederick A. Rossini. "Peer Review of Interdisciplinary Research Proposals". Science, Technology, & Human Values 10, n. 3 (luglio 1985): 33–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016224398501000304.
Testo completoAzizi, Kiran, Shahan Waheed, Rubina Barolia, Naveed Ahmed e Madiha Ismail. "Understanding perceptions and factors involved in do not resuscitate (DNR) decision making in the emergency department of a low-resource country: a mixed-methods study protocol". BMJ Open 10, n. 9 (settembre 2020): e038915. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038915.
Testo completoHodgson, Corinne. "How reliable is peer review? An examination of operating grant proposals simultaneously submitted to two similar peer review systems". Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 50, n. 11 (novembre 1997): 1189–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00167-4.
Testo completoGupta, Vishnu Kumar. "Quality Control through Peer Review Process in Scholarly Communication: Review of Related Literature". IRA-International Journal of Management & Social Sciences (ISSN 2455-2267) 8, n. 3 (7 ottobre 2017): 248. http://dx.doi.org/10.21013/jmss.v8.n3.p3.
Testo completoKotchen, Theodore A. "NIH Peer Review of Grant Applications for Clinical Research". JAMA 291, n. 7 (18 febbraio 2004): 836. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.7.836.
Testo completoLuo, Junwen, Thomas Feliciani, Martin Reinhart, Judith Hartstein, Vineeth Das, Olalere Alabi e Kalpana Shankar. "Analyzing sentiments in peer review reports: Evidence from two science funding agencies". Quantitative Science Studies 2, n. 4 (2021): 1271–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00156.
Testo completoGiraudeau, Bruno, Clémence Leyrat, Amélie Le Gouge, Julie Léger e Agnès Caille. "Peer Review of Grant Applications: A Simple Method to Identify Proposals with Discordant Reviews". PLoS ONE 6, n. 11 (14 novembre 2011): e27557. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027557.
Testo completoScherngell, T., I. Roche, M. Horlesberger, D. Besagni, M. E. Zuger e D. Holste. "Initial comparative analysis of model and peer review process for ERC starting grant proposals". Research Evaluation 22, n. 4 (8 agosto 2013): 248–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvt015.
Testo completovan Gunsteren, Wilfred. "On the pitfalls of peer review". F1000Research 4 (11 novembre 2015): 1244. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7342.1.
Testo completoVodyanitskaya, E. "Peer Review Regulation in the German Science and Research Association". MGIMO Review of International Relations, n. 5(26) (28 ottobre 2012): 227–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2012-5-26-227-234.
Testo completoHall, Meldra, Jeffrey Engler, Japera Hemming, Ernest Alema-Mensah, Adriana Baez, Kimberly Lawson, Alexander Quarshie et al. "Using a Virtual Community (the Health Equity Learning Collaboratory) to Support Early-Stage Investigators Pursuing Grant Funding". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15, n. 11 (30 ottobre 2018): 2408. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112408.
Testo completoColletti, Lisa M., Joseph C. Kolars e James O. Woolliscroft. "GME Innovations Grant Program at the University of Michigan Health System—Fostering Changes in Education and Clinical Care". Journal of Graduate Medical Education 5, n. 4 (1 dicembre 2013): 665–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-12-00317.1.
Testo completoLangille, Lynn L., e Theresa Mackenzie. "Navigating the Road to Success: Guidelines for Preparing Competitive Grant Proposals". Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 2, n. 1 (14 marzo 2007): 23. http://dx.doi.org/10.18438/b8kk5s.
Testo completoGraves, N., A. G. Barnett e P. Clarke. "Funding grant proposals for scientific research: retrospective analysis of scores by members of grant review panel". BMJ 343, sep27 1 (27 settembre 2011): d4797. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4797.
Testo completoTamblyn, Robyn, Nadyne Girard, Christina J. Qian e James Hanley. "Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada". Canadian Medical Association Journal 190, n. 16 (22 aprile 2018): E489—E499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.170901.
Testo completoPier, Elizabeth L., Markus Brauer, Amarette Filut, Anna Kaatz, Joshua Raclaw, Mitchell J. Nathan, Cecilia E. Ford e Molly Carnes. "Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, n. 12 (5 marzo 2018): 2952–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1714379115.
Testo completoBergenholtz, Henning, e Rufus Gouws. "Proposals for the Writing of Peer Reviews in Lexicography". HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business 27, n. 54 (22 dicembre 2015): 107. http://dx.doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v27i54.22950.
Testo completoJayasinghe, Upali W., Herbert W. Marsh e Nigel Bond. "Peer Review in the Funding of Research in Higher Education: The Australian Experience". Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 23, n. 4 (dicembre 2001): 343–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/01623737023004343.
Testo completoGallo, Stephen A., Joanne H. Sullivan e DaJoie R. Croslan. "Scientists from Minority-Serving Institutions and Their Participation in Grant Peer Review". BioScience 72, n. 3 (5 gennaio 2022): 289–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biab130.
Testo completoGuthrie, Susan, Ioana Ghiga e Steven Wooding. "What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?" F1000Research 6 (7 agosto 2017): 1335. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11917.1.
Testo completoGuthrie, Susan, Ioana Ghiga e Steven Wooding. "What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?" F1000Research 6 (27 marzo 2018): 1335. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11917.2.
Testo completoHuutoniemi, Katri. "Communicating and compromising on disciplinary expertise in the peer review of research proposals". Social Studies of Science 42, n. 6 (17 ottobre 2012): 897–921. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306312712458478.
Testo completoBaimpos, Theodoros, Nils Dittel e Roumen Borissov. "Unravelling the panel contribution upon peer review evaluation of numerous, unstructured and highly interdisciplinary research proposals". Research Evaluation 29, n. 3 (1 luglio 2020): 316–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz013.
Testo completoOrtenberg, Elia, Karen Roberto, Dana Plude, Janetta Lun e Helena Gabor. "DEMYSTIFYING NIH PEER REVIEW: YOUR APPLICATION FROM SUBMISSION TO SCORE". Innovation in Aging 6, Supplement_1 (1 novembre 2022): 30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.111.
Testo completoTurner, Sheila, Judith Lathlean, Fay Chinnery, Rebecca Moran, Eleanor Guegan e Jeremy Wyatt. "PP068 Stakeholder Views On Peer Review Of National Institute for Health Research Grant Applications". International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 33, S1 (2017): 102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266462317002434.
Testo completo