Letteratura scientifica selezionata sul tema "Non-prolifération nucléaire – Histoire"
Cita una fonte nei formati APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard e in molti altri stili
Consulta la lista di attuali articoli, libri, tesi, atti di convegni e altre fonti scientifiche attinenti al tema "Non-prolifération nucléaire – Histoire".
Accanto a ogni fonte nell'elenco di riferimenti c'è un pulsante "Aggiungi alla bibliografia". Premilo e genereremo automaticamente la citazione bibliografica dell'opera scelta nello stile citazionale di cui hai bisogno: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver ecc.
Puoi anche scaricare il testo completo della pubblicazione scientifica nel formato .pdf e leggere online l'abstract (il sommario) dell'opera se è presente nei metadati.
Tesi sul tema "Non-prolifération nucléaire – Histoire":
Pélopidas, Benoît. "La séduction de l’impossible : étude sur le renoncement à l’arme nucléaire et l’autorité politique des experts". Paris, Institut d'études politiques, 2010. http://www.theses.fr/2010IEPP0037.
Most "proliferation experts" consider the scenario in which a nuclear-weapon-state gives up his nuclear arsenal as highly improbable or impossible. Academics as well as government experts seem to share this view. They already did when South Africa, Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan did give up their arsenals. This dissertation therefore explores the two sides of the "seduction of the impossible". One leads experts to think about nuclear history within the framework of a "proliferation paradigm" we shall describe; the other leads policymakers to actually do what is considered as impossible, in other words, giving up nuclear arsenals or ambitions. For this discourse of impossibility to be valid, two conditions should be met. First, this impossibility should be identified in the past thanks to a series of necessary conditions that reduces its probability. Second, the future should be known to resemble the past. This dissertation tests these two assumptions with structured and focus comparisons of historical cases and investigates the consequences of the "proliferation paradigm" in terms of political authority of experts. It tests a series of supposedly necessary conditions for renunciation to occur and assesses whether these conditions could be sufficient. If so, under the assumption that the future will resemble the past, experts could dictate a unidimensional renunciation policy on the sole basis of their knowledge
Mangin, Maïlys. "La conversion de l'AIEA à la lutte contre la prolifération nucléaire : une internationalisation tactique des jeux gouvernementaux nord-américains, d'Atoms for peace aux sanctions contre les « Atomic ayatollahs »". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Université de Lille (2022-....), 2022. http://www.theses.fr/2022ULILD024.
This thesis analyzes the transformations of the IAEA's (International Atomic Energy Agency) nuclear non-proliferation missions and the uses to which they are put, from its creation during the Cold War to the Iranian nuclear crisis. It exposes the social foundations of a process of politicization of the IAEA, characterized by the intensification and conflictualization of exchanges of blows between the social actors and sectors that mobilize the institutional resources of this IO. Drawing on a variety of interviews and archives, the thesis sheds light on the constraints that this politicization context exerts on the perceptions and practices of actors both inside and outside the IAEA's institutional boundaries. The thesis first traces how the bipolar system, and then its collapse, influenced the way in which North American foreign policy actors addressed the problem of nuclear proliferation, and structured the ways in which the IAEA was mobilized in this respect. After having been a by-product of the United States' civilian nuclear export policy, the IAEA's non-proliferation activities were called into question as part of US struggles to restructure post-Cold War foreign policy in the Middle East. This thesis then analyzes how this politicization process, as a logic of situation, structures the way in which the IAEA's expertise is produced and mobilized in the context of the Iranian dossier. It shows that the IAEA's investigation in Iran, from 2003 onwards, is as much an autonomous technical process as a fuel for the competition to define (un)acceptable Iranian nuclear activities. In this respect, this thesis proposes an alternative to “circulatory” sociology, substituting the study of import-export logics between national spaces with that of tactical interdependence between social spaces with no geographical proximity. Going beyond the opposition between instrumental uses and legitimizing virtues of IOs, this approach helps to renew the analysis of the strategic uses of IOs and their effects
Libri sul tema "Non-prolifération nucléaire – Histoire":
Cerami, Joseph R. Leadership and policy innovations, from Clinton to Bush: Countering the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. New York: Routledge, 2012.
Bethe, Hans Albrecht. The road from Los Alamos. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1991.
Bethe, Hans Albrecht. The road from Los Alamos. New York, NY: American Institute of Physics, 1991.
Fitzpatrick, Mark. The Iranian nuclear crisis: Avoiding worst-case outcomes. Oxford: Routledge for the International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2008.
Goldblat, Jozef. Arms control: A guide to negotiations and agreements. Oslo: PRIO, 1994.
Goldblat, Jozef. Arms control: The new guide to negotiations and agreements. 2a ed. London: Sage Publications, 2002.
Frieman, Wendy. China, arms control, and nonproliferation. London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2004.
Homayounvash, Mohammad. Iran and the Nuclear Question: History and Evolutionary Trajectory. Taylor & Francis Group, 2016.
Homayounvash, Mohammad. Iran and the Nuclear Question: History and Evolutionary Trajectory. Taylor & Francis Group, 2016.
Homayounvash, Mohammad. Iran and the Nuclear Question: History and Evolutionary Trajectory. Taylor & Francis Group, 2016.