Letteratura scientifica selezionata sul tema "Methodology and tools"
Cita una fonte nei formati APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard e in molti altri stili
Consulta la lista di attuali articoli, libri, tesi, atti di convegni e altre fonti scientifiche attinenti al tema "Methodology and tools".
Accanto a ogni fonte nell'elenco di riferimenti c'è un pulsante "Aggiungi alla bibliografia". Premilo e genereremo automaticamente la citazione bibliografica dell'opera scelta nello stile citazionale di cui hai bisogno: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver ecc.
Puoi anche scaricare il testo completo della pubblicazione scientifica nel formato .pdf e leggere online l'abstract (il sommario) dell'opera se è presente nei metadati.
Articoli di riviste sul tema "Methodology and tools":
Kostenko, Leonid, e Tatiana Simonenko. "Scientometrics: Methodology and Tools". Naukovì pracì Nacìonalʹnoï bìblìoteki Ukraïni ìmenì V Ì Vernadsʹkogo, n. 43 (7 settembre 2016): 285–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.15407/np.43.285.
Măgurian, Daniel, e Gheorghe Oancea. "Design Methodology of Laminating Tools". Applied Mechanics and Materials 657 (ottobre 2014): 121–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.657.121.
Queudeville, Yann, Todor Ivanov, Uwe Vroomen, Andreas Bührig-Polaczek, Stefanie Elgeti, Markus Probst, Marek Behr et al. "Design methodology for modular tools". Production Engineering 5, n. 4 (11 maggio 2011): 351–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11740-011-0318-x.
SHINNO, Hidenori, Hitoshi HASHIZUME, Hayato YOSHIOKA e Kenji ITOH. "Product Development Methodology for Machine Tools". JSME International Journal Series C 45, n. 3 (2002): 815–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1299/jsmec.45.815.
Rusinova, E. S. "Methodology for using digital educational tools". Transport Technician: Education and Practice 4, n. 2 (23 giugno 2023): 144–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.46684/2687-1033.2023.2.144-148.
KOVALEVA, O. "NEUROMARKETING RESEARCH TECHNOLOGIES: TOOLS AND METHODOLOGY". Vestnik of Polotsk State University Part D Economic and legal sciences, n. 1 (24 maggio 2023): 57–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.52928/2070-1632-2023-63-1-57-60.
Gazda, Jakub. "REAL BUSINESS CYCLE THEORY – METHODOLOGY AND TOOLS". Economics & Sociology 3, n. 1 (20 maggio 2010): 42–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.14254/2071-789x.2010/3-1/5.
Tang, Lei, Zhiwen Yu, Hanbo Wang, Xingshe Zhou e Zongtao Duan. "Methodology and Tools for Pervasive Application Development". International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks 10, n. 4 (gennaio 2014): 516432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/516432.
Rhyne, Jim, Roger Ehrich, John Bennett, Tom Hewett, John Sibert e Terry Bleser. "Tools and methodology for user interface development". ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics 21, n. 2 (aprile 1987): 78–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/24919.24921.
Zare Mehrjerdi, Yahia. "Six‐Sigma: methodology, tools and its future". Assembly Automation 31, n. 1 (22 febbraio 2011): 79–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01445151111104209.
Tesi sul tema "Methodology and tools":
Zheng, Wenbo, e Hongxi Zhong. "Reconfigurable Machine Tools Design Methodology". Thesis, KTH, Industriell produktion, 2012. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-119082.
Dogan, Emre. "Digital Learning Tools : Methodology in a Multimodal World". Thesis, Stockholms universitet, Institutionen för pedagogik och didaktik, 2014. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-102654.
Namvar, Gharehshiran Amir. "High Level Synthesis Evaluation of Tools and Methodology". Thesis, KTH, Skolan för informations- och kommunikationsteknik (ICT), 2014. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-177362.
Direne, Alexandre Ibrahim. "Methodology and tools for designing concept tutoring systems". Thesis, University of Sussex, 1993. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.334970.
Powers, Brenda Joy. "A test methodology for reliability assessment of collaborative tools". Thesis, Monterey, Calif. : Springfield, Va. : Naval Postgraduate School ; Available from National Technical Information Service, 2004. http://library.nps.navy.mil/uhtbin/hyperion/04Sep%5FPowers.pdf.
Mella, Luca. "Ict security: Testing methodology for targeted attack defence tools". Master's thesis, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, 2014. http://amslaurea.unibo.it/6963/.
Karuppoor, Srinand Sreedharan. "Tools for innovation and conceptual design". Texas A&M University, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/1260.
Silva, Robson dos Santos e. "A rigorous methodology for developing GUI-based DSL formal tools". Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 2013. https://repositorio.ufpe.br/handle/123456789/12366.
Approved for entry into archive by Daniella Sodre (daniella.sodre@ufpe.br) on 2015-03-13T12:57:10Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertacao Robson Santos Silva.pdf: 2657380 bytes, checksum: e8bfe7912e7136af0fbf6082153115fd (MD5) license_rdf: 1232 bytes, checksum: 66e71c371cc565284e70f40736c94386 (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2015-03-13T12:57:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertacao Robson Santos Silva.pdf: 2657380 bytes, checksum: e8bfe7912e7136af0fbf6082153115fd (MD5) license_rdf: 1232 bytes, checksum: 66e71c371cc565284e70f40736c94386 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-08-23
It is well-known that model-driven engineering (MDE) is a software development methodology that focuses on creating and exploiting (specific) domain models. Domain models (conceptually) capture all the topics (for instance, entities and their attributes, roles, and relationships as well as more specific constraints) related to a particular problem. It is common to use domain-specific languages (DSL) to describe the concrete elements of such models. MDE tools can easily build domain-specific languages (DSL), capturing syntactic as well as static semantic information. However, we still do not have a clear way of capturing the dynamic semantics of a DSL as well as checking the domain properties prior to generating the implementation code. Formal methods are a well-known solution for providing correct software, where we can guarantee the satisfaction of desired properties. Unfortunately the available formal methods tools focus almost exclusively on semantics whereas human-machine interaction is "left to the user". Several industries, and in particular the safety-critical industries, use mathematical representations to deal with their problem domains. Historically, such mathematical representations have a graphical appeal. For example, Markov chains and fault-trees are used in safety assessment processes to guarantee that airplanes, trains, and other safety-critical systems work within allowed safety margins. In general, due to the difficulty to obtain correct software, such industries use Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) software or build them specifically to satisfy their needs with a related testing campaign effort. Such DSLs are difficult to capture, using just MDE tools for instance, because they have specific semantics to provide the desired (core) information for the industries that use them. In this sense, given a DSL (L) composed of a syntax and static semantics (SSL), and dynamic semantics (DSL) parts, our work proposes a rigorous methodology for combining the easiness of MDE tools, to capture SSL, with the correctness assured by formal methods, to capture DSL as well and check its properties. This combination is specifically handled in the following way, we capture all aspects of L using formal methods, check the desired properties and adjust if necessary. After that, we automatically translate part of it in terms of constructs of a MDE tool, from which we can build a user-friendly (GUI) front-end very easily (automatically). Finally, we link the front-end code to the automatically synthesized code from the formal dynamic semantics back-end. Although we require the use of a formal methods tool, the distance from the mathematical representations used in industry and the formal methods notation is very close. With this proposed methodology we intend that safety-critical industries create their domain specific software as easy as possible and with the desired static and dynamic properties formally checked.
A Engenharia Dirigida a Modelos ou (MDE—Model-Driven Engineering) é uma metodologia de desenvolvimento de software que se concentra na criação e manipulação de modelos específicos de domínio. É comum o uso de linguagens específicas de domínio (DSL) para descrever os elementos concretos de tais modelos. Ferramentas de MDE podem facilmente construir linguagens específicas de domínio (DSL), capturando seus aspectos sintáticos assim como sua semântica estática. No entanto, ainda não possuem uma forma clara de capturar a semântica dinâmica de uma DSL, assim como a verificação de propriedades de domínio antes da geração de código executável. Métodos formais são tidos como uma solução para prover software correto, onde podemos garantir que desejadas propriedades são satisfeitas. Infelizmente, as ferramentas de métodos formais disponíveis concentram-se quase que exclusivamente na semântica enquanto que a interação homem-computador é "deixada para o usuário". Indústrias em que a segurança é crítica, usam representações matemáticas para lidar com os seus domínios de problemas. Historicamente, essas representações matemáticas têm um apelo gráfico. Por exemplo, Cadeias de Markov e Árvores de Falha. Em geral, devido à dificuldade em obter softwares formalmente verificados, essas indústrias utilizam sistemas comerciais prontos para uso (Commercial Off-the-shelf - COTS) ou os constróem especificamente para satisfazerem as suas necessidades com um esforço considerável em testes. Tais DSLs são difíceis de capturar, usando apenas ferramentas MDE por exemplo, porque possuem uma semântica particular para prover as informações específicas desejadas para as indústrias que as utilizam. Neste sentido, dada uma DSL (L), composta por sintaxe e semântica estática (SSL), e semântica dinâmica (DSL), este trabalho propõe uma metodologia rigorosa para combinar a facilidade de ferramentas MDE em capturar SSL, com a corretude assegurada por métodos formais para capturar DSL e verificar suas propriedades. Esta combinação é especificamente tratada da seguinte maneira: captura-se todos os aspectos de L utilizando métodos formais, verificam-se as propriedades desejadas e as ajustam caso necessário. Em seguida, parte de L é traduzida automaticamente em termos de artefatos para uma ferramenta MDE, a partir da qual é possível construir uma interface amigável (front-end) facilmente (automaticamente). Por fim, o código do front-end é integrado com o código sintetizado automaticamente a partir da semântica dinâmica formal (back-end).
Hsu, Yung-Kao. "A methodology for refining formal software specification using transformation-based tools". Diss., Georgia Institute of Technology, 1991. http://hdl.handle.net/1853/8185.
Herron, Colin. "A methodology to disseminate selected lean manufacturing tools into general manufacturing". Thesis, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne, 2009. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.505838.
Libri sul tema "Methodology and tools":
Fàbrega, Lluís, Pere Vilà, Davide Careglio e Dimitri Papadimitriou, a cura di. Measurement Methodology and Tools. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41296-7.
Mira, José, Angel Pasqual del Pobil e Moonis Ali, a cura di. Methodology and Tools in Knowledge-Based Systems. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-64582-9.
International, Conference on Industrial &. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence &. Expert Systems (11th 1998 Castellón Spain). Methodology and tools in knowledge-based systems. Berlin: Springer, 1998.
H, Dale Virginia, e English Mary R, a cura di. Tools to aid environmental decision making. New York: Springer, 1999.
Association, Information Resources Management. Research methods: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, an imprint of IGI global, 2015.
Dori, Dov. Object-process methodology: A holistics systems paradigm. Berlin: Springer, 2002.
Kobozeva, Nadezhda, e Vera Dunaeva. The quality of audit services: concept, methodology, tools. ru: INFRA-M Academic Publishing LLC., 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/1016909.
Corporation, Digital Equipment. A methodology for software development using VMS tools. Maynard, Mass: D.E.C., 1988.
Margules, C. R. Guidelines for using the BioRap methodology and tools. Dickson: CSIRO, 1995.
Ayer, Steve J. Integrating CASE tools with a systems design methodology. [Sunnyvale, Calif.]: Technical Communications Associates, 1990.
Capitoli di libri sul tema "Methodology and tools":
Satoh, Shigeru. "Machizukuri methodology and tools". In Japanese Machizukuri and Community Engagement, 73–90. New York : Routledge, 2020. | Series: Planning, heritage and sustainability: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429201851-8.
Ginnerskov-Dahlberg, Mette. "Methodology and analytical tools". In Student Migration from Eastern to Western Europe, 27–51. London: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003056287-2.
Fàbrega, Lluís, Pere Vilà, Davide Careglio e Dimitri Papadimitriou. "Introduction". In Measurement Methodology and Tools, 1–4. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41296-7_1.
López de Vergara, J. E., e J. Aracil. "Measurements and Measurement Tools in OpenLab: Use Cases with Measurement Data Ontologies". In Measurement Methodology and Tools, 159–74. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41296-7_10.
Stéger, József, Sándor Laki e Péter Mátray. "A Monitoring Framework for Federated Virtualized Infrastructures". In Measurement Methodology and Tools, 175–94. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41296-7_11.
Fàbrega, Lluís, Pere Vilà, Davide Careglio e Dimitri Papadimitriou. "Summary and Conclusions". In Measurement Methodology and Tools, 195–203. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41296-7_12.
Papadimitriou, Dimitri, Lluís Fàbrega, Pere Vilà, Davide Careglio e Piet Demeester. "Measurement-Based Experimental Research Methodology". In Measurement Methodology and Tools, 5–22. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41296-7_2.
Angelopoulos, Constantinos Marios, e Sotiris Nikoletseas. "Experimental Performance Evaluation of Sensor-Based Networking for Energy Efficiency in Smart Buildings". In Measurement Methodology and Tools, 23–42. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41296-7_3.
Liu, Wei, Stratos Keranidis, Michael Mehari, Jono Vanhie-Van Gerwen, Stefan Bouckaert, Opher Yaron e Ingrid Moerman. "Various Detection Techniques and Platforms for Monitoring Interference Condition in a Wireless Testbed". In Measurement Methodology and Tools, 43–60. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41296-7_4.
Giatsios, Dimitris, Apostolos Apostolaras, Thanasis Korakis e Leandros Tassiulas. "Methodology and Tools for Measurements on Wireless Testbeds: The NITOS Approach". In Measurement Methodology and Tools, 61–80. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41296-7_5.
Atti di convegni sul tema "Methodology and tools":
Ningfang Song, Jiaomei Qin, Xiong Pan e Yan Deng. "Fault injection methodology and tools". In 2011 International Conference on Electronics and Optoelectronics (ICEOE). IEEE, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iceoe.2011.6013043.
Ortloff, Dirk, Jens Popp, Thilo Schmidt, Kai Hahn, Matthias Mielke e Rainer Brück. "MEMS product engineering: methodology and tools". In SPIE MOEMS-MEMS, a cura di Mary Ann Maher, Jung-Chih Chiao e Paul J. Resnick. SPIE, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.876104.
Giacconi, Riccardo. "Methodology and tools for astronomical research". In Optical Telescopes of Today and Tomorrow, a cura di Arne L. Ardeberg. SPIE, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.269115.
Riabtsev, G. L. "РOLICY ANALYSIS TOOLS: ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH METHODOLOGY". In DEVELOPMENT TRENDS IN PUBLIC MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION IN UKRAINE AND THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND. Izdevnieciba “Baltija Publishing”, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-371-2-9.
Dunlop, Al, Alper Demir, Peter Feldmann, Sharad Kapur, David Long, Robert Melville e Jaijeet Roychowdhury. "Tools and methodology for RF IC design". In the 35th annual conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/277044.277155.
Schotborgh, Wouter O., Maarten H. L. Ro¨ring, Roxana Grigoras, Frans G. M. Kokkeler, Hans Tragter e Fred J. A. M. van Houten. "A Development Methodology for Parametric Synthesis Tools". In ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. ASMEDC, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2007-34421.
Pixley, Chittor, Meyer, McMaster e Benua. "Functional verification 2003: technology, tools and methodology". In 2003 5th International Conference on ASIC Proceedings (IEEE Cat No 03TH8690) ICASIC-03. IEEE, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icasic.2003.1277478.
Cimren, Emrah, Robert Havey e DongJin Kim. "A novel simulation methodology for modeling cluster tools". In 2013 Winter Simulation Conference - (WSC 2013). IEEE, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/wsc.2013.6721746.
Pedram, Massoud, e Yanzhi Wang. "Design automation methodology and tools for superconductive electronics". In ICCAD '18: IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3240765.3243470.
Homayouni, Samira, Vaclav Raida e Philipp Svoboda. "CMPT: A methodology of comparing performance measurement tools". In 2016 8th International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops (ICUMT). IEEE, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icumt.2016.7765349.
Rapporti di organizzazioni sul tema "Methodology and tools":
Franzon, Paul D. Methodology, Tools and Demonstration of MCM System Optimization. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, luglio 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada328732.
Joly, Martin, Paul Bourdoukan, Jan-Bleicke Eggers, Martin Andersen, Chris Bales, Gabriel Ruiz, Daniel Trier, Christine Weber e Sebastian Herkel. Urban energy concept Solar district heating Methodology and tools:. IEA SHC Task 52, giugno 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.18777/ieashc-task52-2018-0004.
Spravka, John J., Marie E. Gomes e Stephanie Lind. Tools for Automated Knowledge Engineering (TAKE) System Evaluation Methodology. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, giugno 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada291145.
Breisinger, Milena, e Emmanuel Boulet. Greenhouse Gas Assessment Emissions Methodology. Inter-American Development Bank, agosto 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0009045.
Menuhin, Jonathan. Innovation Ecosystem Management Methodology. A cura di Marcello Basani, Alejandro Minatta e Cecilia Maroñas. Inter-American Development Bank, marzo 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0012851.
Walicki, Michal, Jens U. Skakkebaek e Sriram Sankar. The Stanford Ada Style Checker: An Application of the Anna Tools and Methodology. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, agosto 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada311136.
Wayant, Nicole. Adapting agile philosophies and tools for a research environment. Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S.), settembre 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.21079/11681/45442.
Aimes, Ashley, Steven Ginnis, Cameron Garrett e Elena Di Antonio. Developing rapid and effective communications testing: background and methodology. Food Standards Agency, febbraio 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.46756/sci.fsa.quz737.
Jorratt, Michel. Methodology for Measuring the Fiscal Effect of Regional Expenditures in Colombia. Inter-American Development Bank, giugno 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0006625.
Yahupov, Vasyl V., Vladyslav Yu Kyva e Vladimir I. Zaselskiy. The methodology of development of information and communication competence in teachers of the military education system applying the distance form of learning. [б. в.], luglio 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.31812/123456789/3852.