Letteratura scientifica selezionata sul tema "International Penal Court"

Resumen: Uno de los campos más importantes dentro de la Traducción e Interpretación en los Servicios Públicos son los tribunales. Entre la gran variedad de tribunales que existen encontramos uno con unas características propias muy llamativas: la Corte Penal Internacional. El presente artículo sostiene la hipótesis de que, como institución única, va a actuar de una manera propia en lo referente a la gestión lingüística y, sobre todo, va a tener una terminología propia muy diferente a la que nos vamos a encontrar en la traducción e interpretación jurídica habitual. Con el fin de confirmar dicha hipótesis hemos realizado el análisis tanto de la documentación bibliográfica disponible como de la página web de la CPI y del documento fundacional de la misma: el Estatuto de Roma (2011). Gracias a esto hemos podido concluir que, en efecto, la Corte posee una terminología propia pero que su gestión de los servicios de traducción e interpretación no difiere en exceso de la que realizan instituciones internacionales como la Unión Europea o la Organización de las Naciones Unidas.Abstract: Courts are one of the most important fields in Public Services Translation and Interpreting. Among all existing courts, we may find one whose specific characteristics are quite interesting: The International Criminal Court. The hypothesis this article supports is that the Court is a unique institution and so is going to manage its languages and, above all, is going to have a specific terminology, very different to that found in usual legal translation. In order to confirm our hypothesis, we have analyzed both the Court’s official documents we were able to find within its webpage and the foundational document of the Court: The Rome Statute (2011). Thanks to this we were able to conclude that the Court has indeed a specific terminology. However, its language management is not very different from that carried out by international institutions such as the European Union or the United Nations.

El siguiente trabajo tiene como objetivo analizar, no sólo la inclusión del ecocidio como quinta categoría de crimen de competencia de la Corte Penal Internacional, sino también analizar el posible cambio de paradigma de ampliar las sanciones penales —que hoy son individuales—, hacia la responsabilidad de las sociedades como las empresas y multinacionales nacionales e internacionales. Esto es, se busca pasar de una sanción penal individual para quien causa daños graves al medio ambiente —ineficaces hasta ahora—, a la vinculación penal de sociedades y corporaciones tanto a nivel nacional como internacional.

Baron Raffaele Garofalo's memorable treatise Criminology ends (almost as an afterthought) with an Appendix entitled “Outline of Principles Suggested as a Basis for an International Penal Code”. In barely twelve pages he formulates: principles of criminal liability; an enumeration of categories of offenders; a system of penalties to be adopted to combat crime; and some basic rules of procedure for bringing offenders to justice. Garofalo was not a cranky, lofty or flamboyant idealist. Together with Cesare Lombroso and Enrico Ferri he was the founder of the famous Positivist School of Criminology launched in Italy towards the end of the nineteenth century. He was a High Court Judge, a tough realist with a sharp and incisive mind. Staunch traditional conservative that he was, he might instead have been expected to advocate that each nation should be free to express its unique individuality through its own distinctive legal and penal edifice.

Iraq occupies an advanced position in the list of countries that suffer from widespread cases of enforced disappearance, but its penal legislation is still devoid of punishment for the crime of enforced disappearance, despite the fact that it is one of the first countries to accede to the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance of 2006 based on Act No. (17) of 2010 which raises the question of how criminal accountability for the perpetrators is based on national legislation, especially the Penal Code No. (111) of 1969 and the Iraqi Supreme Criminal Court Act No. (10) of 2005. To exclude the legislative shortcomings in the punitive legislation regarding the criminalization and punishment of enforced disappearance, the efforts of the Iraqi legislator in recent years have culminated in the introduction of the draft law against enforced disappearance of 2018, as well as the draft penal code of 2021, which constitutes a significant step towards Iraq’s fulfillment of its international obligations stemming from the international convention For the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance of 2006. The research is devoted to studying Penal Code No. (111) of 1969 and the Iraqi Supreme Criminal Court Act No. 10 of 2005 to examine the possibility of their application to cases of enforced disappearance. It also includes an explanation of the mechanisms for the enforcement of international conventions, especially the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance of 2006, in Iraqi legislation, as well as an analysis of the texts of the draft law against enforced disappearance of 2018 and the draft Penal Code of 2021 to present appropriate recommendations regarding the criminalization and punishment of enforced disappearance in them.

Abstract Almost 30 years after acceding to the Convention against Torture, in 2017 Italy introduced the crime of torture into its penal code. There was great debate as to whether the new provisions were in line with the country’s international obligations. The first interpretations of these rules by the highest criminal court draw heavily on international notions, in particular on the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. The result is that, while the wording of the provisions remains questionable, their application tends to be consistent with (at least some) international rules.

When the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation included penal labour as a form of punishment, the legislative framework governing the appointment and execution of this criminal punishment was updated. This brought about an objective need to study the procedure of substituting other punishments, not related to the isolation of the convict from society, with penal labour. Based on legal acts and research, the author raises the question whether it is admissible to substitute compulsory and corrective labour with penal labour according to Part 3 of Art. 49 and Part 4 of Art. 50 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, respectively, if the malicious evasion from serving the previous sentence concerns the convict's violation of labour discipline. Some researchers believe that when substituting the unserved part of compulsory or corrective labour with a more severe criminal punishment, the court should not take into account the nature of malicious evasion. However, certain types of violations of the procedure and conditions for serving compulsory and corrective labour under Art. 30 and Art. 46 of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation testify to the inability of the convict to carry out labour activities, which is an integral attribute of penal labour. Therefore, the court needs to consider substituting the unserved part of compulsory or corrective labour with confinement, which will spare the necessity of returning to this issue when the convict is found to be maliciously evading compulsory labour. Currently, there is no uniform judicial practice on the problem under study. The failure to fulfill or improper fulfillment of the labour duties by the convict may be a reason for substituting compulsory or corrective labour with both penal labour and imprisonment, since the court is not required to justify the choice of punishment in the form of penal labour or confinement when a case under Part 3 of Art. 49 and Part 4 of Art. 50 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is being considered. The author proposes to amend Decree No. 21 of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of December 20, 2011, “On the application by courts of legislation on the execution of sentences”, according to which the systematic violation of labour discipline by the convict while serving compulsory or corrective labour becomes the basis for the substitution of the unserved part of the punishment with penal labour. The proposed changes not only comply with the norms of international law, but also make it possible to exclude the use of penal labour in relation to convicts avoid labour activity.

The present work analyzes the contribution of the Nuremberg Tribunal to the shaping of the concept of crimes against humanity, particularly in the sphere of the prevention of the occurrence of new atrocities, such as those experienced in our recent history. The study approaches the need to review the past, reinforcing the warning that intolerance contributes to social, political, and international chaos. The investigation is also justified by the need to revise the historical aspects of the context in which the International Criminal Court was created, with the aim of punishing the most serious crimes against humanity. The present work analyzes the process by which the ICC was formed, with a focus on its historical and legal features, highlighting iconic cases to go on trial at the Court, if in existence when the events occurred.

Resumen: Este trabajo examina la primera condena de la Corte Penal Internacional por destrucción de patrimonio histórico. Tras analizar brevemente el conflicto interno en Mali, se estudia el desarrollo del proceso penal contra el Sr. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi, desde la remisión de la situación por el ministro de justicia maliense a la Oficina del Fiscal de la Corte hasta la fase final de reparación del daño tras la sentencia de condena. La relevancia de este caso es mayúscula, no solo por el delito objeto de la condena sino por las dificultades a la hora de establecer la reparación del daño, atendiendo a la categorización diversa de las víctimas de tales crímenes internacionales.Palabras clave : Corte Penal Internacional, Mali, crímenes de guerra, destrucción patrimonio histórico, protección internacional del patrimonio histórico-cultural, condenas por destrucción de patrimonio cultural.Abstract: This paper analyses the first international conviction for destruction of cultural heritage delivered by the International Criminal Court. After a brief study of the situation in Mali, the development of the procedure is examined, from the beginning, the referral of the situation by the Malian Ministry of Justice, till the reparations phase. The relevance of this case is absolutely exceptional, not alone by the particular war crime subject to the judgment, but also by the innovative Reparations Order, regarding the categorization of the multiple types of victims. Keywords: International Criminal Court, Mali, war crime, destruction of cultural heritage, international protection of historic and cultural heritage, convictions for destruction of cultural heritage.

Violations of international humanitarian law are not a new phenomenon. Nor is the establishment of an international criminal court to counter such violations a new idea. The first project creating a link between violations of a humanitarian treaty — that is, the Geneva Convention of 1864 for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded in Armies in the Field — and penal sanction by a permanent international judicial body was drawn up by Gustave Moynier, one of the founders of the ICRC Like so many other projects, it did not materialize, however.

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Contrariando a clássica concepção que se estabeleceu como paradigma e, praticamente, converteu-se em obstáculo epistemológico à idéia de que era possível um Direito Penal universal, consolida-se, cada vez mais, o fenômeno da internacionalização do direito, notadamente do direito penal. Este movimento de internacionalização do Direito Penal surge de uma dinâmica bipolarizada, vale dizer, por um lado alimentada pelas sistemáticas violações aos direitos humanos e, por outro, fomentada pelo sonho de um instrumento com legitimidade internacional para punir e processar os crimes mais graves à humanidade. Porém, ao contrário do quanto se pode imaginar, este ideal de proteção internacional dos Direitos Humanos não é novo e só com a superação da clássica concepção de soberania é que se completa o conjunto de condições compatíveis com a internacionalização do direito. Neste contexto surge a necessidade de aproximação entre os Direitos Humanos e o Direito Penal, já que estas ciências sempre foram consideradas incompatíveis entre si. Esta aproximação foi concretizada através do Tribunal Penal Internacional, porquanto sua implementação com o Estatuto de Roma, enquanto instrumento para repressão das mais graves violações aos Direitos Humanos, representa esperança de garantia aos direitos mais íntimos à família humana.
The phenomenon of law internationalization, specially criminal law, is increasingly consolidating, in spite of the established classical paradigm that practically turned into an epistemological obstacle to the idea that it was possible a universal criminal law. This trend of criminal law internationalization arises from a polarized dynamic, that is, one hand, fueled by systematic human rights violations and also fostered by the dream of an instrument with international legitimacy to punish and prosecute the most serious crimes against humanity. However, contrary to what one might imagine, this ideal of international protection of Human Rights is not new and only with the overcoming of the classical conception of sovereignty is that the set of conditions consistent with international law is complete. In this context, it arises the need for rapprochement between Human Rights and Criminal Law, since these sciences have always been considered incompatible. This approach was made through the International Criminal Court as its implementation with Rome Statute, as a tool for repression of the most serious human rights violations, represents hope of guarantee to the most intimate rights to the human family.

Submitted by Rosina Valeria Lanzellotti Mattiussi Teixeira (rosina.teixeira@unisantos.br) on 2016-04-13T14:47:14Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Edigardo Ferreira Soares Neto.pdf: 1028853 bytes, checksum: 70f63bd2384eff0b1bd14f8959b7c5d6 (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-13T14:47:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Edigardo Ferreira Soares Neto.pdf: 1028853 bytes, checksum: 70f63bd2384eff0b1bd14f8959b7c5d6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-09-03
In this dissertation, it will be made an approach to the International Criminal Court (ICC) rules in comparison with those of the Brazilian legal system, what coincide, making a check analysis of possible antinomies between internal standard and internalized. In this north, will be carried out an assessment of International Courts historical evolution that existed and the Court of Rome predecessors forms, in addition to the perception of data relating to its creation and accession of Brazil for their rules. In sequence, the features Court are related and, in this line, individual criminal responsibility, own this approach, in addition to the reflection on the concept of the Statute Member States sovereignty. Then the study is concentrated on the examination of international criminal law in comparison with the international criminal law, where international cooperation is addressed, in addition to the core crimes and criminal principles common to the internal order and external, all under the rules paradigm for the protection of international human rights. Finally, it will be checked the apparent shocks between constitutional rules and the Rome Statute, a verification of compatibility, a control of all juridical convention on domestic law impact and effect.
Neste trabalho, far-se-á uma abordagem das normas do Tribunal Penal Internacional em comparação com as do ordenamento jurídico brasileiro, naquilo que coincidem, fazendo uma análise de verificação das possíveis antinomias entre a norma interna e a internalizada. Neste norte, será realizada uma apreciação da evolução histórica das Cortes Internacionais que existiram e foram antecessoras do Tribunal de Roma, além da percepção dos dados referentes à sua criação e adesão do Brasil as suas regras. Em sequência, as características da Corte serão relacionadas e, nesta linha, a responsabilidade penal individual, própria desta abordagem, além do reflexo no conceito de soberania dos Estados/Partes do Estatuto. Em seguida, o estudo é concentrado no exame do direito penal internacional em comparação com o direito internacional penal, onde a cooperação internacional é abordada, além dos core crimes e princípios penais comuns à ordem interna e externa, tudo sob o paradigma das regras de proteção aos direitos humanos internacionais. Por fim, checar-se-á os aparentes choques entre normas constitucionais e as do Estatuto de Roma, numa verificação de compatibilidade, num controle de convencionalidade do impacto e consequência ao direito interno.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:24:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 mauricioaraujo.pdf: 436422 bytes, checksum: 6d1f2ed853ea14c4d94222c5a74fe3ed (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005-04-20
The objective of this paper is to assess the constitutional bases that allowed Brazil to subscribe to the International Criminal Court and the resulting obligation to respect its jurisdiction and to provide judicial cooperation. Therefore this paper discusses the concept of State sovereignty, within the context of national and international law and its historical evolution, from the beginning of international law and the sovereign States up until the institutionalization of an international legal order with the enforcement of an international jus cogens, based on the pacific resolution of conflicts and on the universalization of human rights. The creation of the International Criminal Court is discussed from the principles of complementarity and non-intervention. This study analyses the compatibility between the International Criminal Court and the current concept of sovereignty, the system of the United States Organization, the treaties on human rights and the constitutional principles of criminal proceedings present in the Brazilian Constitution of 1988. In order to evaluate the compatibility among these systems, it was necessary to establish a comparison between the principles of criminal proceedings in the Federal Constitution of 1988, especially the due process of law and the principle of a fair trial, present in international treaties on human rights and in the international military courts of Nuremberg and Tokyo, in the ad hoc courts of the United Nations for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda and in the International Criminal Court from the Statute of Rome. Finally, this paper analyses the principles of criminal proceedings in the International Criminal Court, as in the wording of the Statute of Rome, comparing them with the principles of a fair trial as determined by international treaties on human rights, which are a true international jus cogens.
Este trabalho tem como objetivo verificar os fundamentos constitucionais que permitiram ao Brasil aderir ao Tribunal Penal Internacional, a conseqüente obrigação de respeitar a sua jurisdição e de oferecer cooperação judicial. Para tanto, foi abordado o conceito de soberania do Estado em face do direito interno e internacional, sua evolução histórica, desde a origem do direito internacional e dos Estados soberanos até a institucionalização de uma ordem jurídica internacional, com a imposição de uma norma cogente internacional, ou jus cogens internacional, baseada na solução pacífica dos conflitos e na universalização dos Direitos Humanos. A criação do Tribunal Penal Internacional é abordada tendo em vista o princípio da complementaridade e da não intervenção. É realizada uma análise da compatibilidade do Tribunal Penal Internacional com o atual conceito de soberania, com o sistema da Organização das Nações Unidas, com os tratados de Direitos Humanos e com os princípios constitucionais do processo penal na Constituição brasileira. Para a verificação da compatibilidade entre os sistemas, foi necessário realizar uma comparação entre os princípios do processo penal da Constituição Federal de 1988, mormente o do devido processo legal, com o princípio do julgamento justo (fair trial), constante dos tratados internacionais de Direitos Humanos e nos tribunais militares de Nuremberg e de Tóquio, nos tribunais ad hoc da Organização das Nações Unidas para ex-Yugoslávia e Ruanda e no Tribunal Penal Internacional do Estatuto de Roma. Por fim, foram analisados os princípios do processo penal do Tribunal Penal Internacional, contemplados na redação do Estatuto de Roma, comparando-os com os princípios do processo justo previsto nos tratados internacionais de Direitos Humanos, que se constitui em verdadeiro jus cogens internacional.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-08-10T10:47:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DANILO MARQUES BORGES.pdf: 1107337 bytes, checksum: 56f9e88391c486e83abf677306f8893c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-11-25
This thesis aims to address the institute of international criminal liability established by the International Criminal Court in light of its importance to the effectiveness of human rights protection. Having goals and understand how they developed the idea of an international criminal law consubstancializado the International Criminal Court, established by the United Nations in 1998 by the Rome Statute. The guiding research questions are: in times of International Criminal Court, further justified the creation of courts of exception? The prediction of item "b" of article 13 of the Rome Statute is sufficient to remove the circumstantial character of established courts to hold nationals of countries not signatory to the said statute or only increases the selectivity and politicization of international accountability for the commission of violations of human rights? The overall objective of the study is to analyze the establishment of international criminal accountability procedures specified in paragraph "b" of article 13 of the Rome Statute to investigate crimes committed by nationals of countries that are not signatories or the said treaty or no show interest in human rights violators accountable. Specific objectives has been, first, to understand, in historical perspective, the process of asserting human rights as a subject of international law and politics, highlighting her background and early experiences; set of principles to understand the structure and jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court emphasizing the complementary nature of its jurisdiction; analyze the procedure of international cooperation, particularly the Office of the delivery, as mitigation instrument of selectivity trials authorized by Security Council Resolution enclose; and, finally, demonstrate that despite selective and highly politicized performances of the International Criminal Court have contributed largely to expand the recognition of human rights as a matter of jus cogens.
A presente dissertação pretende abordar o instituto da responsabilidade penal internacional instituída pelo Tribunal Penal Internacional em face de sua importância para a efetividade da proteção dos Direitos Humanos. Tendo como objetivos entender como se desenvolveu a ideia de um direito penal internacional consubstancializado no Tribunal Penal Internacional, instituído pela Organização das Nações Unidas em 1998, por meio do Estatuto de Roma. As questões que orientam a pesquisa são: em tempos de Tribunal Penal Internacional, ainda se justifica a criação de tribunais de exceção? A previsão da alínea b do artigo 13 do Estatuto de Roma é suficiente para retirar o caráter circunstancial de tribunais instituídos para responsabilizar pessoas nacionais de países não signatários do referido estatuto ou somente aumenta a seletividade e a politização da responsabilização internacional pela prática de violações de direitos humanos? O objetivo geral do estudo é analisar a forma de instauração de procedimentos de responsabilização penal internacional prevista na alínea b do artigo 13 do Estatuto de Roma para se apurar crimes cometidos por nacionais de países que ou não são signatários do referido tratado ou não demonstram interesse em responsabilizar violadores de direitos humanos. Como objetivos específicos tem-se, primeiramente, compreender, em perspectiva histórica, o processo de afirmação dos direitos humanos como tema de direito e de política internacional, ressaltando seus antecedentes e as primeiras experiências; compreender a principiologia, a estrutura e a competência do Tribunal Penal Internacional enfatizando o caráter complementar de sua jurisdição; analisar o procedimento de cooperação internacional, mormente o instituto da entrega, como instrumento mitigador da seletividade que julgamentos autorizados por resolução do Conselho de Segurança encerram; e, por fim, demonstrar que apesar de seletivas e altamente politizadas as atuações do Tribunal Penal Internacional têm contribuído em larga escala para a ampliação do reconhecimento dos direitos humanos como tema de jus cogens.

Este trabalho tem por objetivo propor a adoção do instituto da desconsideração da personalidade jurídica pelo Tribunal Penal Internacional como forma de aumentar a efetividade de seus requerimentos de cooperação aos Estados. Para isto, foram analisadas as intervenções humanitárias e a criação dos tribunais penais internacionais de Ruanda e da Ex-Iugoslávia. Esta análise concluiu que a falta de efetividade tem sido o maior problema enfrentado pelas ações voltadas à proteção internacional dos direitos humanos. Sob este aspecto foi estudada a criação do Tribunal Penal Internacional, sua estrutura, suas normas de cooperação e apontada a falta de um instituto que garanta a eficácia de seus atos jurídicos quando estes dependem da cooperação com Estados. Através do estudo da desconsideração da personalidade jurídica percebeu-se sua compatibilidade com o Direito Internacional, em relação aos Estados sob atuação da jurisdição complementar do Tribunal. Sendo assim, defende-se sua adoção como uma contra-medida tomada no contexto da responsabilidade de um Estado perante o Tribunal Penal Internacional por um ato de não cooperação, quando este for caracterizado por fraude ou abuso de competência. Assim, afirma-se a possibilidade e a conveniência da adoção do instituto da desconsideração da personalidade jurídica como um instrumento que garanta uma maior efetividade do Tribunal no exercício de suas funções.
This work has for objective to consider the adoption of the institute of the disregard of the legal entity for the International Criminal Court as form to increase the effectiveness of its cooperation requirements to the States. For this, the humanitarian interventions and the creation of international the criminal courts of Rwanda and of Former-Yugoslavia had been analyzed. This analysis concluded that the effectiveness lack has been the biggest problem faced for the actions directed to the international protection of the human rights. Under this aspect was studied the creation of the International Criminal Court, its structure, its norms of cooperation and pointed the lack of an institute that guaranties the effectiveness of its legal acts when these they depend on the cooperation with States. Through the study of the disregarding of the legal entity its compatibility with the International Law was perceived, in re1ation to the States under performance of the complementary jurisdiction of the Court. Being thus, its adoption is defended as a countermeasure taken in the context of the responsibility of a State before the International Criminal Court for an act of non-cooperation, when this will be characterized by fraud or abuse of power. Thus, it is affirmed possibility and the convenience of the adoption of the institute of the disregarding of legal entity as an instrument that guaranties a bigger effectiveness of the Court in the exercise of its functions.

O continente africano tem registado algum nível de crescimento económico, porém este crescimento não faz face às lutas, nomeadamente, contra a pobreza, o VIH-Sida, a imigração ilegal, o tráfico de seres humanos, o narcotráfico bem como o terrorismo e o crime organizado, devido as débeis estruturas responsáveis pelas administrações de justiça (polícia, tribunais, profissionais de justiça e dos serviços prisionais). Deste modo, a taxa de criminalidade cresce consideravelmente. O presente trabalho visa demonstrar que a África tem sido um campo de diversas atrocidades e conflitos, o que leva às dificuldades socioeconómicas, aos regimes repressivos e aos riscos de segurança pessoal. De modo a aplicar diferentes instrumentos para prevenir os conflitos e unificar os possíveis efeitos devastadores que possam por em causa a vida das populações inocentes, a estabilidade e a segurança, apresentamos as mais sutis vias que Direito Internacional conheceu, bem como aplicação jurídico-penal para os indivíduos violadores do Direito Internacional Humanitário; ABSTRACT: The African continent has experienced some level of economic growth, but this growth does not face the struggles, namely, poverty, HIV-AIDS, illegal immigration, trafficking in human beings, drug trafficking and terrorism and organized crime, because the weak structures for the civil justice (police, courts, justice professionals and prison services). Thus, the crime rate increases considerably. This dissertation aims to demonstrate that Africa has been a field of various atrocities and conflicts, which leads to the socio-economic difficulties, repressive regimes and personal safety hazards. In order to apply different tools to prevent conflicts and unify the possible devastating effects that might jeopardize the lives of innocent people, stability and security, we present the more subtle ways that met international law as well as criminal legal application for individual’s violators of international humanitarian law.

O objetivo desta pesquisa é realizar uma aplicação da Metodologia da Teoria da Ciência, elaborada pelo prof. José R. Novaes Chiappin, no campo do direito internacional. Essa metodologia procura desenvolver mecanismos racionais para análise e solução de problemas. Tais mecanismos permitem uma melhor compreensão teórica das variáveis envolvidas num problema dado, de modo a fornecer orientações mais seguras para a ação prática. Selecionei o problema da justiça internacional para mostrar como a solução de problemas depende de estruturas teóricas prévias. Mais especificamente, pretendo demonstrar que a criação do Tribunal Penal Internacional representa a emergência do primeiro regime de direito internacional penal, no qual os princípios fundamentais desdobram-se em normas e regras detalhadas e são operacionalizados por mecanismos de tomada de decisão. Diversas outras iniciativas, consubstanciadas em documentos internacionais significativos, já haviam condenado o uso da força nas relações internacionais, afirmado os direitos da pessoa e criminalizado a violação dos mesmos, mas nenhuma obtivera efeito prático satisfatório. Em contrapartida, o TPI apresenta instrumentos concretos para a operacionalização da normativa internacional de direitos humanos. A análise dos documentos constitutivos do TPI à luz da Metodologia da Teoria da Ciência permite identificar a função dos componentes do Tribunal e situá-los com relação ao direito internacional penal como um todo.
The purpose of this research is to make an application of the Methodology of the Theory of Science, created by professor José R. Novaes Chiappin, in the field of international law. This methodology strives to develop rational mechanisms for the analysis and solution of problems. Such mechanisms help to attain a better theoretical understanding of the variables involved in a given problem, thus providing more reliable orientations for practical action. I have chosen the problem of international justice to show how problem solving depends on previous theoretical structures. More specifically, I intend to demonstrate that the creation of the International Criminal Court represents the emergence of the first regime for international criminal law, in which the fundamental principles unfold in detailed norms and rules and are made operative by decision-making devices. Several other initiatives, contained in significant international documents, had already condemned the usage of force in international relations, sustained human rights and transformed their violation into a crime, but none had obtained satisfactory practical effect. On the contrary, the ICC presents concrete instruments to make international human rights law operative. The analysis of the constitutive documents of the ICC in the light of the Methodology of the Theory of Science helps to identify the function of the components of the Court and to situate them in relation to international criminal law as a whole.

Submitted by Gisely Teixeira (gisely.teixeira@uniceub.br) on 2016-11-29T17:46:29Z No. of bitstreams: 1 60000221.pdf: 2396470 bytes, checksum: e1d54122d12a98684cd9d874a995028f (MD5)
Approved for entry into archive by Rayanne Silva (rayanne.silva@uniceub.br) on 2016-12-12T22:59:38Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 60000221.pdf: 2396470 bytes, checksum: e1d54122d12a98684cd9d874a995028f (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2016-12-12T22:59:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 60000221.pdf: 2396470 bytes, checksum: e1d54122d12a98684cd9d874a995028f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005
O Tribunal Penal Internacional realiza uma antiga aspiração da comunidade internacional por uma justiça internacional independente e imparcial, com a competência de responsabilizar criminalmente os indivíduos responsáveis pelas violações mais graves dos direitos humanos. Desde a ratificação do seu Estatuto pelo Brasil, em 20 de junho de 2002, surgiram inúmeras críticas quanto à sua compatibilidade com a Constituição brasileira. Neste trabalho, são apresentados os antecedentes filosóficos, históricos e as dificuldades de implementação do Tribunal bem como as suas principais características, como composição, os crimes de sua competência e as penalidades aplicáveis, avaliando item a item a sua constitucionalidade.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:22:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Luciana de Oliveira Bueno.pdf: 692348 bytes, checksum: f81580072edc0fe11acf77b5b159438d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-08-01
The International Criminal Court represented a major breakthrough in the international scenery, as the accountability of agents who commit extremely serious crimes because it was created in a permanent and complementary manner to national jurisdictions, respecting the principles of universality, complementarity, natural justice and independence. This Court, which differed from background experiences, for their essential characteristics, was structured in an organized way, giving the prosecutor the important investigative role, which greatly contributed to the achievement of the Court work. The Court's decisions, in turn, are uttered with the observance of the principles of legal reserve and prior criminal law, giving them greater legal certainty and fairness. However, what is observed is that the States that are committed to cooperate with the work of the Court, often do not contribute to the investigation or to implement the decisions of the Court, which has sparked many debates about the need to apply the law of force rather than the force of law. Another issue of great importance lies in the compatibility of the rules laid down in the Rome Statute with the Brazilian Federal Constitution, which, in some cases, apparently contrasts with our legal system. However, as it will be seen throughout this study, the problem of effectiveness slips in the very development of the countries involved in the conflict and the alleged incompatibilities exist in appearance only and do not constitute in reality
O Tribunal Penal Internacional representou um grande avanço no cenário internacional, quanto à responsabilização de agentes que cometem crimes de extrema gravidade, pois foi criado de forma permanente e complementar às jurisdições nacionais, respeitando os princípios da universalidade, complementaridade, juiz natural e independência. Esse Tribunal, que se diferenciou das experiências antecedentes, por suas características essenciais, foi estruturado de forma organizada, atribuindo ao Procurador o importante papel investigativo, o que muito contribuiu para a concretização dos trabalhos da Corte. As decisões do Tribunal, por sua vez, são proferidas com a observância dos princípios da reserva legal e da anterioridade da lei penal, conferindo-lhes maior segurança jurídica e imparcialidade. Entretanto, o que se observa é que os Estados, que assumem o compromisso de cooperar com os trabalhos da Corte, por muitas vezes não contribuem com a investigação ou para a execução das decisões proferidas pelo Tribunal, o que tem suscitado diversos debates acerca da necessidade da aplicação do direito da força em detrimento da força do direito. Outra questão de grande relevo reside na compatibilidade das normas previstas no Estatuto de Roma com a Constituição Federal brasileira, as quais, em algumas hipóteses, aparentemente contrastam com nosso ordenamento jurídico. Contudo, como se verá no decorrer desse estudo, o problema da efetividade resvala no próprio desenvolvimento dos países envolvidos nos conflitos e as supostas incompatibilidades só existem na aparência e não se configuram na realidade

O momentum simbolizado pela plena atuação do Tribunal Penal Internacional mais de anos após a entrada em vigor de seu Estatuto traz esperanças e constatações difíceis. Assim, correto o entendimento de que a instituição é um dos pilares para a construção de ordem internacional pautada pela pacífica convivência entre as nações, na qual não existam mais massacres ou ditaduras. Ocorre que a recente história da humanidade mostra-se como lamentável comprovação de que essa luz no fim do túnel ainda encontra-se distante de ser alcançada. Da análise dos julgamentos resulta claro que a pretendida atuação preventiva no sentido de evitar que os crimes sejam cometidos pela pronta intervenção de sua jurisdição no conflito, ainda é uma quimera, sendo realidade a atuação ex post factum em relação aos poucos acusados que sentaram no banco dos réus até então. A partir da premissa de que a função primordial do TPI é a investigação, processo e julgamento e, em sendo o caso, condenação dos suspeitos, resulta clara a preponderância do aspecto penal. Como visto, no único caso que conta com sentença condenatória proferida (Lubanga), ao lado do reconhecimento da importância da reparação das vítimas manteve-se a prevalência da função de prevenção geral e especial do organismo internacional. Assentado esse aspecto, tornou-se imperioso compreender como os juízes vinham interpretando os requisitos da AM-AOP. A importância da hipótese foi por diversas vezes evidenciada no trabalho e de certa forma já era antevista na ressalva de Claus Roxin, quando de sua criação em 1963. Assim, a partir da adoção pelos juízes do TPI da teoria da autoria mediata em razão de aparatos de poder como fundamento da figura prevista no artigo 25(3)(a), terceira hipótese, do Estatuto e da constatação de que é única forma idealizada para dar conta, em termos dogmáticos, das especificidades dos crimes praticados em grande escala e sistematicamente tem-se clara a perspectiva de que se torne importante opção de imputação. dos crimes de competência do Tribunal aos acusados. Até o momento o encaminhamento dos casos não permite avaliar a aplicação dos critérios da AM-AOP em sede de sentença, tendo chegado somente até a Decisão de Confirmação das Acusações no caso Katanga e Chui. A AM-AOP ganha maior relevo, outrossim, em vista das diretrizes de política criminal trazidas pelos juízes na fundamentação de suas decisões, dentre as quais podem ser referidas a busca pelo combate da impunidade desses criminosos, bem como a tendência a que se reconheça a maior importância do julgamento dos maiores responsáveis pelos crimes cometidos. Da análise dos casos resulta que a afirmação desse escopo não vem acompanhada de explicitação das razões que legitimariam esse enfoque. Ademais, a presença de um chefe de Estado no banco dos réus não se presta de garantia a que seus subordinados não cometam crimes. Os requisitos dessa forma de intervenção no fato seguem em substância a proposta de Roxin, não tendo sido incorporada somente a exigência de que os aparatos organizados de poder atuem à margem do ordenamento jurídico. Embora não haja condenação até o momento de réu com fundamento na AM-AOP, tem-se claro que poderá ser de extrema valia para a subsunção dos crimes sob investigação ou julgamento nos demais casos nos quais está sendo aplicada mas cujo andamento está impossibilitado por não terem sido presos os acusados (Saif Al Islam e Omar Al Bashir). A combinação das hipóteses da coautoria e da AM-AOP na figura híbrida da coautoria mediata encontra óbice sob duas perspectivas: não convence em termos dogmáticos porque contraria a construção teórica proposta por Claus Roxin: os critérios do domínio funcional do fato no caso de coautoria e o do domínio da vontade na vertente, interessante para a presente discussão, de AM-AOP amoldam-se à realidade que se pretende enquadrar em termos jurídicos de formas distintas. De outra parte, tendo-se em mente a rigidez do critério da essencialidade da contribuição típico do domínio funcional do fato a mera soma dos requisitos previstos para cada uma das vertentes não parece ser uma boa solução em vista do objetivo de imputar os crimes através das categorias do Estatuto aos acusados preservando equilíbrio entre a busca de responsabilização penal concreta e efetiva e a preservação dos direitos e garantias do réu. O dissenso do Juiz Cuno Tarfusser no caso Katanga explicita essa violação. Por outro lado, essa forma de agir da maioria dos juízes traz flagrante intepretação in malam partem proibida pelo artigo 22(2), do ER. Espera-se que a posição da Juíza Van den Wyngaert manifestada em seu Voto Dissidente no caso Procurador v.Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui ganhe maior força no seio do Tribunal nos próximos anos. Apesar das críticas suscitadas tem-se claro que os avanços conquistados pelos juízes nessa complexa e delicada área da teoria do delito do direito penal internacional são de fundamental importância não somente para o aprimoramento das figuras jurídicas como também para a legitimação da atuação do tribunal perante os estados dada a sua vocação universalista.
O momentum simbolizado pela plena atuação do Tribunal Penal Internacional mais de anos após a entrada em vigor de seu Estatuto traz esperanças e constatações difíceis. Assim, correto o entendimento de que a instituição é um dos pilares para a construção de ordem internacional pautada pela pacífica convivência entre as nações, na qual não existam mais massacres ou ditaduras. Ocorre que a recente história da humanidade mostra-se como lamentável comprovação de que essa luz no fim do túnel ainda encontra-se distante de ser alcançada. Da análise dos julgamentos resulta claro que a pretendida atuação preventiva no sentido de evitar que os crimes sejam cometidos pela pronta intervenção de sua jurisdição no conflito, ainda é uma quimera, sendo realidade a atuação ex post factum em relação aos poucos acusados que sentaram no banco dos réus até então. A partir da premissa de que a função primordial do TPI é a investigação, processo e julgamento e, em sendo o caso, condenação dos suspeitos, resulta clara a preponderância do aspecto penal. Como visto, no único caso que conta com sentença condenatória proferida (Lubanga), ao lado do reconhecimento da importância da reparação das vítimas manteve-se a prevalência da função de prevenção geral e especial do organismo internacional. Assentado esse aspecto, tornou-se imperioso compreender como os juízes vinham interpretando os requisitos da AM-AOP. A importância da hipótese foi por diversas vezes evidenciada no trabalho e de certa forma já era antevista na ressalva de Claus Roxin, quando de sua criação em 1963. Assim, a partir da adoção pelos juízes do TPI da teoria da autoria mediata em razão de aparatos de poder como fundamento da figura prevista no artigo 25(3)(a), terceira hipótese, do Estatuto e da constatação de que é única forma idealizada para dar conta, em termos dogmáticos, das especificidades dos crimes praticados em grande escala e sistematicamente tem-se clara a perspectiva de que se torne importante opção de imputação. dos crimes de competência do Tribunal aos acusados. Até o momento o encaminhamento dos casos não permite avaliar a aplicação dos critérios da AM-AOP em sede de sentença, tendo chegado somente até a Decisão de Confirmação das Acusações no caso Katanga e Chui. A AM-AOP ganha maior relevo, outrossim, em vista das diretrizes de política criminal trazidas pelos juízes na fundamentação de suas decisões, dentre as quais podem ser referidas a busca pelo combate da impunidade desses criminosos, bem como a tendência a que se reconheça a maior importância do julgamento dos maiores responsáveis pelos crimes cometidos. Da análise dos casos resulta que a afirmação desse escopo não vem acompanhada de explicitação das razões que legitimariam esse enfoque. Ademais, a presença de um chefe de Estado no banco dos réus não se presta de garantia a que seus subordinados não cometam crimes. Os requisitos dessa forma de intervenção no fato seguem em substância a proposta de Roxin, não tendo sido incorporada somente a exigência de que os aparatos organizados de poder atuem à margem do ordenamento jurídico. Embora não haja condenação até o momento de réu com fundamento na AM-AOP, tem-se claro que poderá ser de extrema valia para a subsunção dos crimes sob investigação ou julgamento nos demais casos nos quais está sendo aplicada mas cujo andamento está impossibilitado por não terem sido presos os acusados (Saif Al Islam e Omar Al Bashir). A combinação das hipóteses da coautoria e da AM-AOP na figura híbrida da coautoria mediata encontra óbice sob duas perspectivas: não convence em termos dogmáticos porque contraria a construção teórica proposta por Claus Roxin: os critérios do domínio funcional do fato no caso de coautoria e o do domínio da vontade na vertente, interessante para a presente discussão, de AM-AOP amoldam-se à realidade que se pretende enquadrar em termos jurídicos de formas distintas. De outra parte, tendo-se em mente a rigidez do critério da essencialidade da contribuição típico do domínio funcional do fato a mera soma dos requisitos previstos para cada uma das vertentes não parece ser uma boa solução em vista do objetivo de imputar os crimes através das categorias do Estatuto aos acusados preservando equilíbrio entre a busca de responsabilização penal concreta e efetiva e a preservação dos direitos e garantias do réu. O dissenso do Juiz Cuno Tarfusser no caso Katanga explicita essa violação. Por outro lado, essa forma de agir da maioria dos juízes traz flagrante intepretação in malam partem proibida pelo artigo 22(2), do ER. Espera-se que a posição da Juíza Van den Wyngaert manifestada em seu Voto Dissidente no caso Procurador v.Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui ganhe maior força no seio do Tribunal nos próximos anos. Apesar das críticas suscitadas tem-se claro que os avanços conquistados pelos juízes nessa complexa e delicada área da teoria do delito do direito penal internacional são de fundamental importância não somente para o aprimoramento das figuras jurídicas como também para a legitimação da atuação do tribunal perante os estados dada a sua vocação universalista.

This chapter focuses on the question of moral standing: on whose behalf does a criminal court purport to act? It examines the justification for a regional criminal court, namely the proposed Criminal Chamber within the African Court of Justice and Human and Peoples’ Rights. The chapter draws on Emile Durkheim’s concept of the social function of criminal law and Antony Duff’s idea of the requisite ‘political community’ on whose behalf a penal institution speaks to argue that a region can constitute a political community capable of being protected by criminal law and represented by a regional criminal court. The Malabo Protocol, which establishes the Criminal Chamber, includes not only the standard ‘core crimes’ but a range of other crimes as well. This chapter argues that these are crimes that significantly affect Africans and African states, making it appropriate to create a regional institution to attempt to counter them.

Abstract This chapter analyses the enforcement of sentences of imprisonment imposed by international criminal tribunals and courts, especially as opposed to the enforcement of fines and other financial measures. Article 77 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICCS) provides for imprisonment as the main penalty, and fines and forfeiture of proceeds, property, and assets as additional (‘in addition’) penalties. Its division between deprivation of liberty and other, financial measures adds another layer to our understanding of the enforcement regime. Furthermore, the enforcement of sentences and other judicial decisions is—together with extradition and other legal assistance (especially regarding evidence gathering)—a fundamental part of interstate cooperation in criminal matters. As such, it operates, in essence, in a decentralized fashion through enforcement by (willing and able) States, although one may consider the international tribunals’ detention facilities (IDFs) as the nucleus of a centralized international enforcement or even an international penal system. National implementation by representative States is reviewed in this chapter.

This chapter details Monaco's form of government, the court system, and inheritance law. It notes that the Principality of Monaco is a sovereign state on the Mediterranean sea, entirely surrounded by France. It is a constitutional monarchy, with strong executive powers reserved for the Sovereign Prince. The chapter also emphasizes that it is entirely independent of France. However, the legal codes (Civil Code, Penal Code, Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure, Commercial Code) are based on the Napoleonic Code, with some important differences from France. In the context of wills, the chapter emphasizes that wills may be made by anyone over the age of 16, provided they are of sound mind and have not been declared incompetent. It then shifts to explain the order of succession in cases of intestacy—established by the Civil Code. Ultimately, the chapter concludes by addressing reserved heirship and the right of survivorship for joint moveable property.

The issue of the application of technology in criminal proceedings became topical in Serbia with the beginning of the Covid 19 pandemic. Although the existing legislation foresees this possibility, the wider application of technology in criminal proceedings has not been noticed. Observing the practice of the courts, the technology is used in Serbia only in criminal proceedings before special departments for the suppression of organized crime and war crimes, but it is rarely encountered in regular criminal proceedings. On the other hand, the theory is unique about the importance of the application of technology, especially in the protection of witnesses and victims in court proceedings. Also, numerous international legal acts that contain provisions on the protection of witnesses in court proceedings recognize the importance of using technology to avoid numerous negative consequences of court proceedings and to avoid secondary victimization. However, despite numerous recommendations for this type of examination, it was noticed that it is not used in a large percentage in Serbia and certainly not in all cases where it is necessary or useful. The aim of the paper is to analyze the legal norms related to the protection of witnesses in criminal proceedings with a special emphasis on those that foresee or enable the application of technology for adequate protection on the international level and in Serbia, the extent of the application of technology in practice, the reasons for insufficient application and recommendations for the wider application.

This chapter examines the common law principles of the conflict of laws which served and serve to guide the English court to the application of foreign law to issues which it has to decide. But the point of departure is to examine how foreign law is actually applied by an English judge, in order to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the way it is done. It then returns to the characterization of issues (ascertaining the nature of the question to be answered), and of renvoi (asking whether the law to be applied includes its own rules of private international law). The connecting factors, linking an issue to a law, are then summarized. The common law of domicile, the lex domicilii, is examined, and there is a more detailed probing of the operation of statues in the English conflict of laws. The distinctive treatment for issues of procedure, and for the limitation of actions, are examined. The treatment of issues which would appear to be governed by foreign penal laws, revenue laws, and other governmental laws, precedes an examination of the role of English public policy in preventing the application of a rule of foreign law which would otherwise be applicable. Finally, the chapter lists the rules of EU law which are revoked and retained, and for the latter, the principles which accommodate and refine their application by an English court after 31 December 2020.

Abstract This chapter discusses provisions for judicial guarantees under the Geneva Conventions. The Geneva Conventions do not contain a single consolidated provision listing all judicial guarantees applicable in armed conflict. Rather, they set out an elaborate system of guarantees, with rules applicable to various categories of protected persons, and further distinguish between international armed conflict (IAC) and non-international armed conflict (NIAC). Thus, international humanitarian law contains distinct provisions regulating penal proceedings as they relate to: prisoners of war, civilians, civilian internees, and parties to the conflict in NIAC. The chapter elaborates specific elements of these rules, which include the requirement of an ‘impartial’ and ‘regularly constituted court’, the requirement of individual criminal responsibility, and the principle of nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege.

Abstract This chapter discusses jurisdiction over acts of genocide. The Genocide Convention provides for three jurisdictional venues of relevance to the enforcement and implementation of its terms. The first two are competent to prosecute and punish acts of genocide attributable to individual perpetrators. According to Article VI, they consist of: the competent jurisdictions of the state in which acts of genocide have been committed (i.e., the territorial state) and an ‘international penal tribunal’. In addition, Article IX of the convention provides that disputes between contracting parties ‘relating to the interpretation, application or fulfilment’ of the convention can be submitted to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) at the request of any of the parties to the dispute. There is also some suggestion that customary international law provides for ‘universal’ jurisdiction over acts of genocide. Under the most extreme version of that proposition, any state would per force be jurisdictionally competent to investigate and prosecute acts of genocide regardless of the place where the crimes were committed and regardless of the nationality of the perpetrators and victims.

Abstract IN 1980 both Britain and France enacted legislation designed to provide safeguards against the well-known exorbitant jurisdiction claimed by the United States of America in respect of trading activities carried on outside, but having (or alleged to have) ‘effects’ within the United States. In Britain it was the Protection of Trading Interests Act 1980 which came into force on 20 March 1980 and replaced the Shipping Contracts and Commercial Documents Act 1964. In France Act No. 80-538 came into force on 16 July 1980 and, apparently, supplements an Act on 28 July 1968. The Statutes of both countries aim at, inter alia, preventing the disclosure of information and documents to foreign authorities and courts and provide for penalties in the event of any breach of the statutory prohibitions. One of the legislator’s reasons no doubt was the belief that in cases in which the law of the United States requires the production of documents the decision of the Supreme Court in Societe Internationale v. Rogers would govern and, therefore, the existence of penal sanctions would furnish an effective defence against unjustifiable requests for documents.

"Humanity has known (forced displacement) as one of the inhuman phenomena, and international law considers it a war crime, and the forcibly displaced area is subjected to various types of psychological, physical, cultural and ethnic torture. Khanaqin has been subjected to more displacement compared to the rest of Iraq's cities, and forced displacement is a systematic practice carried out by governments or armed groups intolerant towards groups that differ from them in religion, sect, nationalism, belief, politics, or race, with the aim of evacuating lands and replacing groups other population instead. Forced displacement is either direct, i.e. forcibly removing residents from their areas of residence, or indirect, such as using means of intimidation, persecution, and sometimes murder. This phenomenon varies in the causes and motives that depend on conflicts and wars, and greed, as well as dependence on cruelty in dealing and a tendency to brutality and barbarism. With regard to forced displacement in Iraq before the year 2003 AD, it was a systematic phenomenon according to a presidential law away from punishment, and it does not constitute a crime, as evidenced by the absence of any legal text referring to it in the Iraqi Penal Code, but after the year 2003 AD, criminal judgments were issued against the perpetrators of forced displacement. For the period between 17/7/1967 to 1/5/2003 CE, displacement cases were considered a terrorist crime, and consideration of them would be the jurisdiction of the Iraqi Central Criminal Court. The deportations from the city of Khanaqin were included in the forced displacement, by forcibly transferring the civilian population from the area to which they belong and reside to a second area that differs culturally and socially from the city from which they left. Al-Anbar governorate identified a new home for the displaced residents of Khanaqin, first, and then some of the southern governorates. We find other cases of forced displacement, for example, what happened to the Faili Kurds. They were expelled by a presidential decision, and the decision stated: (They were transferred to Nakra Salman, and then they were deported to Iran). These cases of deportation or displacement have led to the emergence of psychological effects on the displaced, resulting from the feeling of persecution and cultural extermination of the traditions of these people, and the obliteration of their national identity, behavior and practices. After the year 2003 AD, the so-called office for the return of property appeared, and there was a headquarters in every governorate, Except in Diyala governorate, there were two offices, the first for the entire governorate, and the second for Khanaqin district alone, and this indicates the extent of injustice, displacement, deportation, tyranny, and extermination that this city was subjected to. The crimes of forced displacement differ from one case to another according to their causes, origins, goals and causes - as we mentioned - but there are expansive reasons, so that this reason is limited to greed, behavior, cruelty, brutality and barbarism. But if these ideas are impure and adopted by extremists, then they cause calamity, inequality and discrimination, forcing the owners of the land to leave. In modern times, the crime of forced displacement has accompanied colonial campaigns to control other countries, so that displacement has become part of the customs of war, whether in conflicts external or internal. Forced displacement has been criminalized and transformed from an acceptable means of war to a means that is legally and internationally rejected by virtue of international law in the twentieth century, especially after the emergence of the United Nations charter in 1945 AD And the two Additional Protocols attached to the Geneva Conventions of 1977 AD, as well as declarations, , conventions and international conferences that included explicit legal texts criminalizing forced displacement as a universal principle of genocide. My approach in this study is a field-analytical approach, as I present official data and documents issued by the competent authorities and higher government agencies before the year 2003 AD, and indicate the coordinates and modalities of the process of displacement and deportation, as well as an interview with the families of the displaced, taking some information and how to coexist with their new imposed situation. forcibly on them."

Abstract The respective object will have the proposal to develop a study about the importance of the Criminological Examination regarding the rehabilitation and integration of the individual in society, as an instrument that makes it possible to offer the convict the opportunity to receive treatment, education and work, to undergo a process of social recovery. The Exam is located in the Execution Law and in the Penal Code, in the legal device nº 7.210/84 and the enactment of Law nº 10.792/03, which revoked the obligation of the referred exam and became optional. The objective of the work is to reflect the value of such a procedure that arises to promote/guarantee the dignity, humanization and individual/collective rights of the prisoner. The methodological procedure will be based on the bibliographic review, through specialized literature of scientific articles, books and doctrines, in the search to support the study and offer content based on the most renowned authors, such as: Bitencourt (2004); Capez (2007); Fernandes (2002); Fernandes (2010); Marcao (2009); Mirabete (2002); Mirabet (2004). With the application of the Exam it would be possible to draw a study about the personality of the individual and to analyze the circumstances that led to the commission of the crime, as well as to grant prison benefits, conditional release and regime progression. It was concluded that, the advent of the new Penal Execution Law, discarded the obligation of the prisoner the due condition to be evaluated, which would serve as the basis for the decisions of judges and courts when applying the granting of prison privileges.