Segui questo link per vedere altri tipi di pubblicazioni sul tema: Ecosystem management.
Articoli di riviste sul tema "Ecosystem management"
Cita una fonte nei formati APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard e in molti altri stili
Vedi i top-50 articoli di riviste per l'attività di ricerca sul tema "Ecosystem management".
Accanto a ogni fonte nell'elenco di riferimenti c'è un pulsante "Aggiungi alla bibliografia". Premilo e genereremo automaticamente la citazione bibliografica dell'opera scelta nello stile citazionale di cui hai bisogno: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver ecc.
Puoi anche scaricare il testo completo della pubblicazione scientifica nel formato .pdf e leggere online l'abstract (il sommario) dell'opera se è presente nei metadati.
Vedi gli articoli di riviste di molte aree scientifiche e compila una bibliografia corretta.
1
Mamboleo, Martin. "An Ecosystem Approach for The Sustainable Use and Management of the Lake Victoria Ecosystem". Journal of Sustainability Perspectives 3, n. 1 (9 agosto 2023): 24–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.14710/jsp.2023.15619.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
The key to achieving sustainable development is striking a balance between the exploitation of natural resources for socioeconomic development and the preservation of ecosystem services, which are essential to everyone's well-being and livelihood. This can be achieved by using the ecosystem approach which promotes fair conservation and sustainable use of both land, water and living resources. Over the years, human activities have played an important role in the degradation of natural ecosystems, either due to pollution or unsustainable development. Lake Victoria is the best example of the impact of anthropogenic activity on ecosystems, as it has undergone dramatic biophysical and geochemical changes in a relatively short time. Managing Lake Victoria requires the coordinated efforts of individuals, landowners, research institutions, community groups, and the government. This lake is an important group of natural resources due to its ecosystem services and often unique cultural characteristics hence need for sustainable management. This article focuses on using the ecosystem method to determine optimal management approaches for the Lake Victoria ecosystem's long-term sustainability. The article proposes an integrated stakeholder-based management system and holistic regional development in lake areas that will preserve natural ecosystems without compromising the sustainable use of ecosystem services. As a result, there is a need to remedy the lake ecosystem's degradation in order to retain the shared ecological services that support socioeconomic well-being.
2
KHVESYK, Mykhailo, e Maria ILINA. "ECOSYSTEM PAYMENTS AS THE TOOL IMPLEMENTING THE ECOSYSTEM APPROACH IN NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT". Economy of Ukraine 2022, n. 10 (24 ottobre 2022): 76–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2022.10.076.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Growing environmental threats and the depletion of natural resources urge to review the scientific concepts of society's interaction with nature. At the same time, the ecosystem approach is slowly being implemented in environmental economics, although theoretical and methodological principles of the approach have not yet been properly put into practice in Ukraine. In this regard, peculiarities of transformation of the present natural resource management mechanism with implementation of ecosystem approach applying its key economic tool – the ecosystem payments – are substantiated. The ecosystem approach to natural resource management is the management strategy considering complicated biological relations within ecosystems, the natural resources of which are used if planning and implementing any nature management measures. The approach also represents the comprehension that these relations are worthy, since they are able to affect the state, capacity and output of key ecological functions of ecosystems. The hierarchical structure of the ecosystem approach implementation procedure in the natural resource management has been reflected in the guiding principles of the Convention on Biological Diversity. From both theoretical and practical points of view the principles should be divided into organizational-economic and ecological-economic. Ecosystem payments are payments for usage, non-usage of ecosystem resources or services, compensation for their pollution or degradation; all payments paid in the framework of the ecosystem approach aiming to protect and preserve ecosystems, provide rational use of their resources and support the functions. They include obligatory payments for the usage of ecosystem resources, their pollution, depletion or degradation; compensatory payments which the state pays to citizens for the usage of their ecosystems or to farmers for non-usage of ecosystems or usage if introducing new technologies; payments for ecosystem services; equivalent payments. The criteria to determine the type of payments are their optionality; the type of budget they are paid from; predominance of ecosystem’s worth over market prices; goal of the payments; the possibility to regulate payments with civil contracts, delay payments and change the amount; dependency of payments on the results of economic activity; mutual benefits.
3
Roundy, Philip T. "Technology rewind: The emergence of the analog entrepreneurial ecosystem". Journal of General Management 47, n. 2 (27 dicembre 2021): 111–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03063070211023448.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Research has focused on the ecosystems of forces that influence how organizations pursue opportunities in new industries, nascent markets, and novel technologies. However, there is an emerging, but unstudied, ecosystem supporting entrepreneurial activities in legacy industries, mature markets, and based on (seemingly) obsolete technologies—the analog entrepreneurial ecosystem (AEE). To develop a framework to explain this phenomenon and guide entrepreneurs and managers operating in this ecosystem, a theory of the AEE is proposed. The theory explains the ecosystem’s main components and delineates the forces driving its emergence. The model contributes to research on ecosystems, technology reemergence, and management in mature markets and has implications for organizations pursuing opportunities outside the digital ecosystem and based on legacy products.
4
Hamilton, Sara L., Mary G. Gleason, Natalio Godoy, Norah Eddy e Kirsten Grorud-Colvert. "Ecosystem-based management for kelp forest ecosystems". Marine Policy 136 (febbraio 2022): 104919. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104919.
Testo completo
5
JØrgensen, S. E. "Ecosystem Management and Ecological Modeling". Scientific World JOURNAL 2 (2002): 107–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2002.80.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
It is the intention of this paper to demonstrate that environmental technology must be supplemented by other tools to be able to solve environmental problems properly. Five cases are used to illustrate the possibilities of ecological engineering, a new engineering field based on ecology, as chemical engineering is based on chemistry. It encompasses restoration of ecosystems, utilization of ecosystems to the benefit of both mankind and nature, construction of ecosystems, and ecologically sound planning of ecosystems from a holistic point of view. Ecological engineering requires a good knowledge of the system properties of ecosystems to be able to fully utilize the possibilities that ecosystem management offers. Models reflecting the ecosystem properties are furthermore needed to be able to quantify the effects of the ecological engineering solutions to the environmental problems. This is clearly demonstrated in two of the five case studies presented in the paper.
6
Ben Letaifa, Soumaya. "The uneasy transition from supply chains to ecosystems". Management Decision 52, n. 2 (11 marzo 2014): 278–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/md-06-2013-0329.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Purpose – This paper uses the multidimensional definition of value – ecosystemic value – and employs lifecycle theory to identify the different stages of evolution of value-creation and -capture processes in an ecosystem. Specifically, the aim of this paper is to show the uneasy transition from supply chains to ecosystems. Design/methodology/approach – Based on a field study of a Canadian ICT ecosystem, this paper adopts a multilevel perspective on value-creation and value-capture processes and illustrates how these processes need to move from a dyadic economic focus to a network socioeconomic one. Findings – The findings pinpoint the uneasy transition from supply-chains management to ecosystems management and provide a framework for understanding how value creation and value capture should be coupled throughout the ecosystem lifecycle. Finally, five theoretical and managerial propositions are suggested to better leverage ecosystemic capabilities and better manage value creation and value capture in ecosystems. Practical implications – Five theoretical and managerial propositions are suggested to better leverage ecosystemic capabilities and better manage value creation and value capture in ecosystems. Originality/value – Many marketing and management scholars discuss the limitations of unbalanced perspectives (customer- or seller-centric) in building a comprehensive view of how value is created and captured. This multi-actors case study highlights how ecosystemic value creation may be obstructed by a firm's focus on value capture.
7
Yun, Seong Do, Barbara Hutniczak, Joshua K. Abbott e Eli P. Fenichel. "Ecosystem-based management and the wealth of ecosystems". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, n. 25 (6 giugno 2017): 6539–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1617666114.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
We merge inclusive wealth theory with ecosystem-based management (EBM) to address two challenges in the science of sustainable management of ecosystems. First, we generalize natural capital theory to approximate realized shadow prices for multiple interacting natural capital stocks (species) making up an ecosystem. These prices enable ecosystem components to be better included in wealth-based sustainability measures. We show that ecosystems are best envisioned as portfolios of assets, where the portfolio’s performance depends on the performance of the underlying assets influenced by their interactions. Second, changes in ecosystem wealth provide an attractive headline index for EBM, regardless of whether ecosystem wealth is ultimately included in a broader wealth index. We apply our approach to the Baltic Sea ecosystem, focusing on the interacting community of three commercially important fish species: cod, herring, and sprat. Our results incorporate supporting services embodied in the shadow price of a species through its trophic interactions. Prey fish have greater shadow prices than expected based on market value, and predatory fish have lower shadow prices than expected based on market value. These results are because correctly measured shadow prices reflect interdependence and limits to substitution. We project that ecosystem wealth in the Baltic Sea fishery ecosystem generally increases conditional on the EBM-inspired multispecies maximum sustainable yield management beginning in 2017, whereas continuing the current single-species management generally results in declining wealth.
8
Kafiyatullina, Yu N., e E. E. Panfilova. "Business ecosystem sustainability management". UPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia) 10, n. 2 (28 giugno 2022): 33–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2022-10-2-33-42.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
The article is devoted to the issues of the sustainable development of such a representative of the ecosystem as a special economic zone. The subject of the study is the organizational interactions that arise between resident companies, clusters within the technopolis and the management company. The conducted research is aimed at determining the criteria for the expediency of selecting participants in the ecosystem, identifying indicators for assessing the effectiveness of their joint functioning. The objectives of the study were to identify key trends in the formation of business ecosystems; to formulate the principles of managing the sustainability of the ecosystem, to determine the levels of sustainability and indicators for measuring it. The methodology of scientific research is based on the assessment of the digital maturity of business processes, the theory of interaction between organizations and the platform approach. Statistical processing methods of reports on management companies, grouping and rating the attractiveness of technoparks for investors were used during the study. The article formulates the principles of sustainability of the business ecosystem, defines the levels and indicators for their assessment. The results of the study are addressed to employees of management companies of special economic zones, heads of executive authorities responsible for the development of industrial policy. The development of research in the field of sustainable development of business ecosystems is related to the consideration of information security issues for agents of the digital economy.
9
Gallop, Shari L., Karin R. Bryan, David P. Hamilton, Melissa Foley e John L. Largier. "ECOENGINEERING FRESHWATER FLOWS FOR ESTUARY HYDROLOGICAL STATE". Coastal Engineering Proceedings, n. 37 (1 settembre 2023): 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.9753/icce.v37.management.17.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
The quantity, quality and timing of freshwater inflow into estuaries is critical to support estuarine ecosystem health. However, most estuaries are affected by upstream manipulation of freshwater inflows. Coinciding with the United Nations Decade of Restoration (2021–2030), there is great interest in re-creating functional estuarine ecosystems, including by modifying the physio-chemical characteristics with the premise that a functional ecosystem will follow (ecoengineering). To restore estuarine ecology, the physical processes of the system must first be conductive to supporting the re-establishment and sustenance of biota. These physical processes are generally under-monitored and often not used as a measure of restoration success. We explore ecoengineering to restore freshwater inflows to estuaries, focused on hydrological state. We use the Pressure—State—Response (PSR) framework to set the context for this review.
10
Pullin, Andrew. "Ecosystem Management". Biological Conservation 97, n. 1 (gennaio 2001): 127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3207(00)00094-x.
Testo completo
11
Kobylko, Alexander. "Telecommunication ecosystems: Special features of management and interaction". Upravlenets 11, n. 1 (4 marzo 2020): 15–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-1-2.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
The article explores the current situation in the telecommunications industry. The current analysis is based on the dual nature of the telecom operator, which can be regarded as an independent ecosystem company and as an infrastructure basis for implementing the model by companies engaged in other areas of the economy. Diversification of services leads to the formation of ecosystems of hightech companies. The methodological framework of the study includes theoretical principles of the ecosystem approach and the theory of management of complex systems. The research methods are deduction, comparison and classification. In the course of the analysis of the telecommunications market, we find that an ecosystem is a complex socio-economic whole consisting of sets of harmoniously functioning blocks. Each ecosystem forms its own industry distinguished from every other. The ecosystem emerges on the basis of the technological platform created by the company. The ecosystem is not built around the company as a legal entity, but precisely around its brand. In order to win the telecom operator’s communication channels, ecosystems interact and unify through partnership or parasitic integration. These integration processes may indirectly indicate that a non-telecommunication company applies the ecosystem concept. The interpenetration of two or more ecosystems can lead to their merger in the future. These particularities show that it is impossible to categorize ecosystem as an unambiguously micro- or mesoeconomic component. Ecosystem management should be based not on the traditional principles of company management, but on a combination of management projects, which are unique, rather than routine, solutions in the form of regulation and assistance in attaining the set goals. The obtained results are of theoretical importance for performing further studies on ecosystem formations in today’s economy. In practical terms, the research results can be useful for the management of companies belonging to various ecosystems to justify the formats of effective business models and development strategies
12
Awano, Haruo, e Masaharu Tsujimoto. "The Mechanisms for Business Ecosystem Members to Capture Part of a Business Ecosystem’s Joint Created Value". Sustainability 13, n. 8 (20 aprile 2021): 4573. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13084573.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Research into business ecosystems has rarely examined the success of business ecosystem members. Business ecosystem leaders tend to focus on their own success rather than carefully monitoring the success of business ecosystem members, and each member must find a mechanism to capture part of the business ecosystem’s joint created value. This study examines the mechanisms by which business ecosystem members capture part of a business ecosystem’s joint created value in the cases of linear tape open (LTO) ecosystems and how these mechanisms contribute to the sustainability of a business ecosystem. A case study was conducted with a review of both the author’s experience with Sony and third-party resources. We confirm the results by panel data analysis. We identified three mechanisms. First, a business ecosystem member can establish a new business ecosystem on their own through newly created complementary innovation. Essentially, a business ecosystem member can become a business ecosystem leader in a new business ecosystem. Second, a business ecosystem member gains market shares from technology leadership, the experience of mass production, and collaboration with the business ecosystem leader. Third, a business ecosystem member who creates complementary innovations can obtain patent royalties. These mechanisms help business ecosystem members stay within business ecosystems and contribute to its success and sustainability.
13
Glukhov, V. V., A. V. Babkin, E. V. Shkarupeta e V. A. Plotnikov. "Strategic Management of Industrial Ecosystems Based on the Platform Concept". Economics and Management 27, n. 10 (17 novembre 2021): 751–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2021-10-751-765.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Aim. The presented study aims to develop a structural model for industrial ecosystem management and to propose strategies for the industrial ecosystem orchestrator.Tasks. The authors systematize the landscape of existing research in the field of ecosystems; identify the problem and determine the research gap; develop the concept of ecosystem entity; determine the specific features of industrial ecosystem management; develop a structural model for industrial ecosystem management based on the platform concept; recommend strategies for the industrial ecosystem orchestrator.Methods. This study uses general scientific methods (synthesis, generalization, content analysis, graphical data interpretation), economic and statistical methods (correlation and regression analysis, mathematical statistics, expert methods, principal components analysis, hierarchical agglomerative clustering). As part of a study of economic sectors and digital technologies, the market structure is analyzed, and the dynamics of development indicators of digitalization processes is described.Results. The landscape of modern ecosystem research, types and properties of ecosystems, the composition of actors and exchange resources by ecosystem type are systematized, the concept of ecosystem entity is developed, and the specific features of industrial ecosystem management are determined. A structural model for industrial ecosystem management is developed. Four strategies for the industrial ecosystem orchestrator are recommended: increasing value, building trust, activating industrial ecology, institutionalization.Conclusions. In the context of digital transformation, it is advisable to implement strategic management of industrial ecosystems based on the platform concept. The results of managing an industrial ecosystem with the orchestrator function include enhancing the maturity and integration potential of synergetic interaction in the ecosystem, maintaining a high level of coherence (consistency) between actors at different hierarchical levels, creating long-term value and improving the quality of life.
14
Gavitt, Jocelyn M., e Richard C. Smardon. "Calculating Cultural Ecosystem Services as part of Greenspace Management?" JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS RESEARCH AND MARKETING 4, n. 4 (2019): 16–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.18775/jibrm.1849-8558.2015.44.3002.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Lake related greenspace provides many benefits to residents and visitors, which often get unnoticed. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Project (2005) proposed the valuation of ecosystem services, defined as regulatory, provisional, ecosystem support, providing cultural services from natural resources, free of charge. The challenge here is: How can we use cultural ecosystem services derived from scenic landscapes for Greenspace management and assessment? Cultural ecosystem services received international recognition as part of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Project (2005). Also, ecosystems services encompass regulatory, provisional and ecosystem support. For this article, we are particularly concerned with cultural services, which include recreation, science and education, spiritual/historical as well as aesthetic functions. De Groot (2002) and Farber (2006) provided descriptions of cultural Ecosystem services. De Groot (2002) describes Information functions as comprising of; aesthetic information, recreation, cultural-artistic information and spiritual/historical information. Farber (2005) description of cultural services includes; aesthetic, recreation, science/education, and spiritual/historical functions. This article examines the existing literature with the objective of assessing ecosystem cultural services related to water-based scenic landscape resources and applies it to an Upstate New York lake landscape. Careful accounting of greenspace ecosystem services is presented as applied to lakeshore residents, village residents and town/watershed residents and other lake greenspace users utilizing the US Environmental Protection Agency’s user benefit calculations to yield over 10.6 million dollars of benefits per year (Smardon 2018).
15
Sato, Daisuke, e Masaru Ishioka. "A Study on Strategic Application of Business Ecosystem to Practical Management System". GATR Journal of Business and Economics Review 7, n. 4 (30 marzo 2023): 15–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.35609/jber.2023.7.4(2).
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Objective – Recently, the market environment has been rapidly changing, and it is difficult for companies to deal with these changes independently. As a countermeasure to these changes, it is considered effective for companies to build ecosystems as solidarity for sharing knowledge or technology with various organizations outside their companies. Methodology – However, the concept of ecosystems in business is vague and complicated. This makes it difficult for companies to apply ecosystem theory to management strategies. To solve these problems, it is necessary to make the theory of ecosystems available to companies to apply their management strategies. Findings – For that reason, based on previous studies, this study categorizes multiple concepts of ecosystems that have developed in an ambiguous state based on the theoretical background, definitions, and characteristics. Also, this study analyzes the types of multiple complementarities, which is a fundamental element of many ecosystem concepts, and organized the ecosystem concepts. Based on this, we present the "Ecosystem construction framework" and the "Process for conception management Strategies utilizing ecosystems" as models for incorporating ecosystem theory into management strategies. Novelty – A deeper understanding of ecosystems through this research is expected to stimulate the sharing of management resources among various organizations by utilizing ecosystems. Type of Paper: Empirical JEL Classification: L26, L29. Keywords: Business ecosystem, Innovation management, Resources Management, Affiliation approach, Structural Approach. Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Sato, D; Ishioka, M. (2023). A Study on Strategic Application of Business Ecosystem to Practical Management System, J. Bus. Econ. Review, 7(4), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.35609/jber.2023.7.4(2)
16
Jõgiste, Kalev, Lee E. Frelich, Floortje Vodde, Ahto Kangur, Marek Metslaid e John A. Stanturf. "Natural Disturbance Dynamics Analysis for Ecosystem-Based Management—FORDISMAN". Forests 11, n. 6 (11 giugno 2020): 663. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/f11060663.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Forest ecosystems are shaped by disturbances and functional features of vegetation recovery after disturbances. There is considerable variation in basic disturbance characteristics, magnitude, severity, and intensity. Disturbance legacies provide possible explanations for ecosystem resilience. The impact (length and strength) of the pool of ecosystem legacies and how they vary at different spatial and temporal scales is a most promising line of further research. Analyses of successional trajectories, ecosystem memory, and novel ecosystems are required to improve modelling in support of forests. There is growing evidence that managing ecosystem legacies can act as a driver in adaptive management to achieve goals in forestry. Managers can adapt to climate change and new conditions through anticipatory or transformational strategies of ecosystem management. The papers presented in this Special Issue covers a wide range of topics, including the impact of herbivores, wind, and anthropogenic factors, on ecosystem resilience.
17
Ramenskaya, Lyudmila. "The concept of ecosystem in economic and management studies". Upravlenets 11, n. 4 (4 settembre 2020): 16–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-4-2.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
The concept of ecosystem enjoys growing popularity among academics and practitioners around the globe. However, due to the inconsistent use and the vagueness of definitions, the application of the concept in economic and management studies is impeded. The paper systematizes the prerequisites, theoretical foundations and conceptual framework of ecosystems as a concept for describing a new structure of social relations. The methodological basis of the research is organizational ecology theory, dynamic capabilities theory and neo-institutional theory. Structural-logical, bibliographic and criterion analysis are the main research methods. The article substantiates the expediency of using the prefix “eco-” when describing the interaction between a company and its environment, and indentifies the primary provisions of organizational ecology affecting the emergence of the ecosystem concept. The author examines the intermediate position of the ecosystem in the neo-institutional dichotomy of market– hierarchy. The study discusses the extent to which the ecosystem influences dynamic capabilities of a firm, and demonstrates inconsistencies in using the term “ecosystem” in academic texts. As a result of bibliographic analysis, we distinguish between four central research discourses of the ecosystem concept (business, innovation, entrepreneurial and platform-based ecosystems), as well as establish their terminological peculiarities and main research avenues. The results obtained can be used to develop the theory of ecosystems and describe ecosystems of real business.
18
Malikov, R. I., K. E. Grishin e G. F. Shaykhutdinova. "SHAPING THE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT OF REGIONAL BUSINESS ECOSYSTEMS". Bulletin USPTU Science education economy Series economy 1, n. 39 (2022): 53–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.17122/2541-8904-2022-1-39-53-60.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
The article discusses issues of a holistic approach to the study of entrepreneurship development at the regional level. The methodological basis of the study is the systematic approach and the concept of entrepreneurial ecosystems based on it, which is used to study entrepreneurship at the regional level. A general approach to defining the structural organization of a regional entrepreneurial ecosystem is presented, which involves the identification of four types of mutually integrated subecosystems: business ecosystems, innovation ecosystems, knowledge ecosystems and enterprise support (promotion) ecosystems. It is determined that the parameters of the development of subecosystems, their combination effect on the creation, discovery and use of entrepreneurial opportunities in the local spatial environment determine the productivity of the regional entrepreneurial ecosystem. It is justified that the proposed structuring gives a clearer view from the point of view of forming and setting up an enterprise productivity management system The approach presented in the article provides an understanding of the general logic of the functioning of the regional entrepreneurial ecosystem, which, in turn, allows the development and implementation of management tools that provide new opportunities for increasing the productivity of the regional entrepreneurial ecosystem
19
Wang, Ding, Xue Yang, Wenhui Xing, Chunlei Liu e Huiping Chang. "Ecosystem Health and Forest Ecosystem Management". IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 598 (25 novembre 2020): 012028. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/598/1/012028.
Testo completo
20
Trenkel, Verena M., Nils Olav Handegard e Thomas C. Weber. "Observing the ocean interior in support of integrated management". ICES Journal of Marine Science 73, n. 8 (31 luglio 2016): 1947–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw132.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Abstract Active- and passive-acoustic methods are widely used tools for observing, monitoring, and understanding marine ecosystems. From 25 to 28 May 2015, 214 scientists from 31 nations gathered for an ICES symposium on Marine Ecosystem Acoustics (SoME Acoustics) to discuss three major themes related to acoustic observations of marine ecosystems: (i) recent developments in acoustic and platform technologies; (ii) acoustic characterisation of aquatic organisms, ecosystem structure, and ecosystem processes; and (iii) contribution of acoustics to integrated ecosystem assessments and management. The development of, and access to new instruments, such as broad bandwidth systems, enables insightful ecological studies and innovative management approaches. Unresolved ecological questions and the increasing move towards ecosystem based management pose further challenges to scientists and instrument developers. Considering the SoME Acoustics presentations in the context of three previous ICES symposia on fisheries acoustics, topics increasingly emphasize ecosystem studies and management. The continued expansion of work and progress in marine ecosystem acoustics is due to the cross-disciplinary work of fisheries acousticians, engineers, ecologists, modellers, and others. An analysis of the symposium co-authorship network reveals a highly connected acoustic science community collaborating around the globe.
21
Manjurmahammad, Dedhrotiya. "Wetlands of India with Reference to Ecosystem Wealth, Threats and Management". International Journal of Zoological Investigations 08, n. 02 (2022): 161–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.33745/ijzi.2022.v08i02.021.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
India has an unusual wealth of wetland ecosystems. Wetlands are established as passages between land and water ecosystem. They donate versatile benefits, especially in the field of the ecosystem, economy and scenic beauty. They are fertile ecosystems that help elective and special biodiversity and habitats and famous for their divergent welfares and courtesies. These ecosystems do not only enhance agricultural impacts on the environment but also provide ecosystem benefits to human society and are under prodigious stress due to industrial pollution, agricultural and urbanization, tourism and fisheries and many more. The present review is focused on the value of wetlands, providing distribution of wetlands and major threats to wetland. It also provides information on how a series of works had been done to save this vulnerable ecosystem.
22
Link, Jason S., Jon K. T. Brodziak, Steve F. Edwards, William J. Overholtz, David Mountain, Jack W. Jossi, Tim D. Smith e Michael J. Fogarty. "Marine ecosystem assessment in a fisheries management context". Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59, n. 9 (1 settembre 2002): 1429–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/f02-115.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
We examined a suite of abiotic, biotic, and human metrics for the northeast U.S. continental shelf ecosystem at the aggregate, community, and system level (>30 different metrics) over three decades. Our primary goals were to describe ecosystem status, to improve understanding of the relationships between key ecosystem processes, and to evaluate potential reference points for ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM). To this end, empirical indicators of ecosystem status were examined and standard multivariate statistical methods were applied to describe changes in the system. We found that (i) a suite of metrics is required to accurately characterize ecosystem status and, conversely, that focusing on a few metrics may be misleading; (ii) assessment of ecosystem status is feasible for marine ecosystems; (iii) multivariate points of reference can be determined for EBFM; and (iv) the concept of reference directions could provide an ecosystem level analog to single-species reference points.
23
Euler, David L. "Will ecosystem management supply woodland caribou habitat in northwestern Ontario?" Rangifer 18, n. 5 (1 marzo 1998): 25. http://dx.doi.org/10.7557/2.18.5.1438.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Ecosystem management is emerging as an important concept in managing forests. Although the basic conceptual idea is not new, important defining principles are developing that elucidate some of the specific attributes of ecosystem management. These principles include: the maintenance of all ecosystems in the managed forest, rhe emulation of natural disturbance patterns on rhe landscape and the insurance that structure and function of forested ecosystems are conserved. Forest management has an impact on woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou), although the presence of wolves (Canis lupus) and moose (Alces alces) in the same northern ecosystems also affects the caribou-forestry interacrion. Specific management for caribou as a featured species has been proposed, based on managing large landscape blocks. Ecosystem management would also produce habitat in a manner that might accomplish the goal of conserving woodland caribou as well as maintaining other important ecosystem functions.
24
Maleque, M. Abdul, Hiroaki T. Ishii e Kaoru Maeto. "The Use of Arthropods as Indicators of Ecosystem Integrity in Forest Management". Journal of Forestry 104, n. 3 (1 marzo 2006): 113–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jof/104.3.113.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Abstract Arthropods play vital roles in various ecosystem functions and respond acutely to habitat manipulation. Diversity and community dynamics of arthropods are strongly correlated with ecosystem functioning. Arthropod community structure reflects habitat heterogeneity, as well as development and recovery of forest ecosystems after natural and anthropogenic disturbances. Arthropod community structure also reflects the degree of fragmentation and isolation of forest ecosystems on the landscape. Arthropods are good indicators of the overall biodiversity and ecosystem integrity of forests and can be used for evaluating and designing sound ecosystem management plans.
25
Popov, E. V., V. L. Simonova e I. P. Chelak. "Developing the Innovation Ecosystem of a Large Enterprise". Economics and Management 27, n. 5 (13 luglio 2021): 324–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2021-5-324-335.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Aim. The presented study aims to verify the author’s analytical model for assessing the development of the innovation ecosystem of a large enterprise.Tasks. The author describes the problems of assessing the level of development of innovative ecosystems; considers the relationship between the indicators of ecosystem dynamics (characterizing the stakeholders of the ecosystem) and the growth rate of production of innovative goods; reveals the specific features of ecosystem management, particularly with regard to interaction with ecosystem stakeholders as a factor in the ecosystem’s development.Methods. The theoretical and methodological basis of this study includes scientific publications on ecosystem genesis and assessment of the development of socio-economic ecosystems. Regression analysis is used to calculate the degree of connectivity between the previously selected indicators affecting the dynamics of production of innovative goods. The informational basis of the study consists of indicators of financial and economic activity of a large industrial enterprise in the Sverdlovsk region as well as indicators characterizing interaction with its stakeholders.Results. Development indicators of the innovation ecosystem of a large enterprise are calculated for 2013-2019 based on its stakeholder decomposition. Factors that are closely linked to the potential aggregate indicator of innovation ecosystem development are identified, and ways to make their analysis less complicated are outlined.Conclusions. Testing of the analytical model for assessing the development of the innovation ecosystem of a high-tech enterprise has revealed the irreducibility of the integral indicator of innovation ecosystem development to the production of new goods. The importance of developing an ecosystem management technology is substantiated.
26
Komorin, V. M. "Theoretical and methodological aspects of sea ecosystem risks management". Ukrainian hydrometeorological journal, n. 31 (30 giugno 2023): 33–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.31481/uhmj.31.2023.03.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
In the context of worsening anthropogenic impact, climate change and natural disasters, the problem of managing the sea areas' ecosystem risks is becoming quite important. This research aims at exploring the modern theoretical and methodological aspects of the aforesaid scientific orientation and focuses on the analysis and evaluation of existing concepts and strategies.
The article analyses main terms and principles and also presents a conceptual model for managing the sea ecosystem risks that plays a key role in reflecting the main theoretical components and their interrelationships. The model contributes to a better understanding of the structure and characteristics of this theory, emphasizing the complexity of interactions between socio-economic systems and marine ecosystems, as well as the risks arising from such interactions. The main elements of the model include natural and anthropogenic factors and consider their impact on the state of marine ecosystems and the risks associated therewith. The model also focuses on well-being, ecosystem stability and biodiversity, i.e. the parameters determining the status and functionality of marine ecosystems.
The research presents a comparative analysis of various methodologies and strategies of ecosystem risks management. The analysis allowed identification of the most effective of them at certain stages of creating an optimum strategy for managing the ecosystem risks. Risk management strategies can be implemented using a variety of tools, such as marine spatial planning, creation of marine protected areas, basic ecosystem management, resource management, and a marine environmental quality management system developed in accordance with the requirements of the EU Marine Strategy Directive. These strategies integrate different approaches to managing the ecosystem risks and contribute to conservation of ecosystems ensuring the marine environment stability.
The work made it possible to open up the prospects for further scientific research, namely development of hypotheses in order to increase theoretical knowledge and develop practical recommendations in the field of management of water areas' ecosystem risks.
The conclusions of the research are aimed at creating a theoretical and methodological base that will contribute to analyzing and developing effective strategies for managing the water areas' ecosystem risks.
27
Guo, Chuanbo, Caihong Fu, Norm Olsen, Yi Xu, Arnaud Grüss, Huizhu Liu, Philippe Verley e Yunne-Jai Shin. "Incorporating environmental forcing in developing ecosystem-based fisheries management strategies". ICES Journal of Marine Science 77, n. 2 (20 dicembre 2019): 500–514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsz246.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Abstract This study incorporated two pathways of environmental forcing (i.e. “larval mortality forcing” and “somatic growth forcing”) into an end-to-end ecosystem model (Object-oriented Simulator of Marine ecOSystEms, OSMOSE) developed for the Pacific North Coast Integrated Management Area (PNCIMA) off western Canada, in order to evaluate alternative fisheries management strategies under environmental changes. With a suite of ecosystem-level indicators, the present study first compared the ecosystem effects of different pathways of environmental forcing scenarios; and then evaluated the alternative fisheries management strategies which encompassed a series of fishing mortality rates relative to FMSY (the fishing mortality rate that produces maximum sustainable yield) and a set of precautionary harvest control rules (HCRs). The main objectives of this study were to (i) explore the ecosystem effects of different environmental forcing scenarios; (ii) identify the impacts of different fishing mortality rates on marine ecosystem structure and function; and (iii) evaluate the ecosystem-level performance of various levels of precautionary HCRs. Results indicated that different pathways of environmental forcing had different ecosystem effects and incorporating appropriate HCRs in the fisheries management process could help maintain ecosystem health and sustainable fisheries. This study provides important information on future fisheries management options within similar marine ecosystems that are facing global changes.
28
Avarmaa, Mari, Lasse Torkkeli, Laivi Laidroo e Ekaterina Koroleva. "The interplay of entrepreneurial ecosystem actors and conditions in FinTech ecosystems: An empirical analysis". Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation 18, n. 4 (2022): 79–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.7341/20221843.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of actors and ecosystem conditions in the development of the FinTech ecosystems in Tallinn and Moscow. METHODOLOGY: The study develops a framework for investigating entrepreneurial ecosystems, combining ecosystem actors with ecosystem conditions. The framework is implemented through a comparative case study of FinTech ecosystems in Tallinn and Moscow, with data drawn from 35 semi-structured interviews and processed by means of thematic analysis. The primary data is supplemented with data from secondary sources. FINDINGS: The findings show how the ecosystem conditions and actors are interdependent in the FinTech ecosystems. Tallinn is an example of a strong entrepreneurial culture with its small market, advanced technological infrastructure, and talent, which leads to the dominance of the FinTech start-ups and the emergence of an active FinTech cluster organization. In Moscow, the institutional context, concentration of financial capital, and its large home market with a loyal customer base limit start-ups’ ability to grow and form the ecosystem. IMPLICATIONS: The study contributes to the literature on entrepreneurial ecosystems and emerging technologies by integrating the streams of research on entrepreneurial ecosystems and FinTech ecosystems, combining FinTech actors with entrepreneurial ecosystem conditions. It also highlights the implications of variations of entrepreneurial culture, characteristics of the domestic demand and formal institutions in the development of ecosystems. It demonstrates that ecosystem conditions are likely to contribute to the emergence of the dominant actor in a particular ecosystem. Our results also suggest that when aiming to develop the FinTech ecosystem in a city, the support given to FinTech cluster organizations is essential. Facilitating university–industry cooperation through the cluster organizations or direct partnerships can contribute to the development of FinTech ecosystems. ORIGINALITY AND VALUE: To our knowledge, this is the first study to illustrate how specific entrepreneurial ecosystem conditions lead to configurations with different types of ecosystem actors, and to illustrate how specific ecosystem conditions impact the way in which actors develop and operate and how the ecosystem configuration is structured. These have been notable omissions in extant entrepreneurial ecosystem research until now. The present study also illustrates sectoral variations in entrepreneurial ecosystems while highlighting the distinct features of emerging ecosystems. It also contributes to the emerging literature on FinTech ecosystems through a comparative empirical perspective, thereby enhancing understanding of local conditions necessary for developing and maintaining FinTech ecosystems in different contexts.
29
Ilina, Mariia. "PLACE OF ECOSYSTEM PAYMENTS IN THE STRUCTURE OF ECONOMIC MECHANISM OF NATURAL RESOURCES USE". Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development, n. 11(30) (2022): 43–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.37100/2616-7689.2022.11(30).5.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Development and implementation of the ecosystem payments conception into the academician framework aims to promote and applicate ecosystem approach into the natural resources management and provide their rational use and biodiversity’s conservation. In the paper the author defines ecosystem payments, substantiates their importance, place and role for the current economic mechanism of environmental policy in Ukraine. She proves further transformation of the mechanism should follow introduction of the ecosystem approach, application of relevant tools and support to agencies facilitating ecosystem payments. Ecosystem payments as an instrument of the economic mechanism of nature management comprise all payments concurrent with the ecosystem approach framework. The payments have been designed to protect and preserve ecosystems, provide rational use of their resources and increase their capacity. The payments include fees for use of ecosystem resources and services, subsidies for the non-use, and costs necessary to restore contaminated or depleted ecosystems. Consequently, ecosystem payments are either obligatory (taxes for use of ecosystem resources, their contamination, exhaustion or degradation), or compensatory (reimbursement for use of ecosystems, subsidies for the non-use, and grants for introduction of better practices), or voluntary (for ecosystem services). Payments for ecosystem services assume an agreement between a user and a supplier should be assigned, a supplier owns the services or has the right to supply them, the market of ecosystem services operates, and methods to estimate the value of ecosystem services is approved. In Ukraine economic mechanism of the nature management is based on the user pay principle and several instruments of financing environmental programs. So the identification of ecosystem payments with payments for ecosystem services considerably cuts down benefits from introduction of the ecosystem approach into the nature management. Further supplement of the nature management mechanism with ecosystem payments requires administrative, regulatory, financial, information and analytical tools, which should be appropriately modified and being well compatible.
30
Kosamu, Ishmael Bobby Mphangwe, Rodgers Makwinja, Chikumbusko Chiziwa Kaonga, Seyoum Mengistou, Emmanuel Kaunda, Tena Alamirew e Friday Njaya. "Application of DPSIR and Tobit Models in Assessing Freshwater Ecosystems: The Case of Lake Malombe, Malawi". Water 14, n. 4 (17 febbraio 2022): 619. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w14040619.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Inland freshwater shallow lake ecosystem degradation is indistinctly intertwined with human-induced factors and climate variability. Changes in climate and human-induced factors significantly influence the state of lake ecosystems. This study provides evidence of the driver, pressure, state, impact, and response (DPSIR) indicators for freshwater lake ecosystem dynamics, taking Lake Malombe in Malawi as a case study. We used the DPSIR framework and Tobit model to achieve the study’s objectives. The study’s findings indicate that top-down processes gradually erode Lake Malombe’s ecosystem state. The lake resilience is falling away from its natural state due to increasing rates of drivers, pressures, and impacts, indicating the lake ecosystem’s deterioration. The study shows that demographic, socio–economic, climatic drivers, pressures, state, and responses significantly (p < 0.05) influenced the lake ecosystem’s resilience. The study suggests that substantial freshwater ecosystem management under the current scenario requires a long-term, robust, and sustainable management plan. The findings from this study provide a roadmap for short-term and long-term practical policy-focused responses, particularly in implementing a freshwater ecosystem restoration programs in Malawi and Africa more broadly.
31
Alpert, Peter. "Incarnating Ecosystem Management". Conservation Biology 9, n. 4 (agosto 1995): 952–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09040952.x.
Testo completo
32
Sarathchandra, Chaya, Yirga Alemu Abebe, Iresha Lakmali Wijerathne, Sasith Tharanga Aluthwattha, Sriyani Wickramasinghe e Zhiyun Ouyang. "An Overview of Ecosystem Service Studies in a Tropical Biodiversity Hotspot, Sri Lanka: Key Perspectives for Future Research". Forests 12, n. 5 (27 aprile 2021): 540. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/f12050540.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Tropical island countries are often highly populated and deliver immense ecosystem service benefits. As human wellbeing depends on these ecosystems, proper management is crucial in the resource-rich tropical lands where there is less related research. Though ecosystem service and biodiversity studies are a promising path to inform the ecosystem management for these mostly developing countries, published evidence of using ecosystem service studies in decision making is lacking. The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of ecosystem services and related research in Sri Lanka, examining trends and gaps in how these studies are conceptualized. Out of the considered 220 peer-reviewed articles, the majority of articles (48.2%) were terrestrial and forest related while coastal ecosystems were considered in 33.2% of studies. In most studies, the ecosystem service category studied was provisioning (31.5%) followed by regulatory service (28.7%). Studies investigating and quantifying ecosystem services, pressures on ecosystems, and their management were fewer compared to studies related to biodiversity or species introduction. Moreover, studies investigating the value of ecosystem services and biodiversity to the communities or involvement of stakeholders in the development of management actions regarding the ecosystem services were rare in Sri Lanka, and an intense focus from future studies in these aspects is timely and necessary.
33
MANDYCH, Oleksandra, Svitlana ZAIKA, Olena ZAIKA, Olena ZHYLIAKOVA e Оksana BLУZNІUK. "RISK MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATION ACTIVITIES IN THE DIGITAL ECOSYSTEM". INNOVATIONS IN THE SCIENTIFIC, TECHNICAL AND SOCIAL ECOSYSTEMS 1, n. 6 (19 maggio 2023): 24–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.56378/mozs20231805.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
The Purpose of the Study is to elaborate the content of the research categories in the field of innovation ecosystem development, to identify the features of creating network ecosystems according to various possible classification criteria, to form directions and models of risk-oriented management and digital adaptation for innovative ecosystems, and to outline the prospects for managing the risks of innovative activities of the digital ecosystem. The Research Methodology.is based on the existing theoretical results in the field of innovation management, risk management, and areas of digital transformation of ecosystems. The study uses a dialectical approach, system analysis, methods of strategic management, and modeling. The scientific Novelty lies in the formation of a model of risk management in the innovation ecosystem, which includes procedures for strategic analysis and strategic management, is the basis for the innovative development of the organization and is aimed at preventing risks and minimizing losses associated with the use of innovations. The Conclusions. Innovation ecosystems are self-organized structures that have stable relationships between individual participants, aimed at forming a flexible, adaptive environment. The innovative development of ecosystems facilitates the process from the birth of an idea to the development, commercialization, implementation, and support of various types of innovations. The study of the architecture of innovation ecosystems and key participants in different network systems confirms species diversity, differences in coverage, and interaction models. Identification of innovation ecosystems using a risk-based approach ensures the continuity of the processes of identifying existing risks, and their mitigation through the involvement of strategic management, and the use of monitoring tools, allowing updating the ecosystem architecture, identifying weaknesses, and implementing updated and improved models. The creation of adapted models for ecosystems in the context of digital adaptation outlines the prospects for the development of innovative digital ecosystems to the basic strategies of market behavior based on risk-oriented management.
34
Zvereva, Tatyana Vladimirovna. ""Smart City" Management: Environmental and Ecosystem Sustainability". Revista Gestão Inovação e Tecnologias 11, n. 4 (10 luglio 2021): 935–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.47059/revistageintec.v11i4.2158.
Testo completo
35
Werner, R. A. "Forest health in boreal ecosystems of Alaska". Forestry Chronicle 72, n. 1 (1 febbraio 1996): 43–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.5558/tfc72043-1.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Deteriorating forest health is causing unprecedented damage to the boreal forests of Alaska. Forest health is a complex issue that must be addressed within the context of ecosystem management and the goal of managing ecosystems for long-term productivity and maintaining ecosystems that will sustain biodiversity and provide desired values, products and uses. Instead of treating symptoms, forests must be managed to be more resistant to pest outbreaks through proper ecosystem management. Forest health can be addressed through short-term tactical approaches and long-term strategies. Management practices must match the ecological capabilities of each site in order to create and maintain healthy forests. This is the focus of ecosystem management. Key words: forest health, boreal forest, ecosystem management
36
TAHER, MOCHTAR MUHAMMAD, M. MUKHLIS KAMAL e ZAIRION ZAIRION. "Potential and management of mangrove ecosystem in South Jailolo Sub-district, West Halmahera, North Moluccas". Bonorowo Wetlands 2, n. 1 (3 giugno 2012): 19–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.13057/bonorowo/w020103.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Taher MM, Kamal MM, Zairion. 2012. Potential and management of mangrove ecosystem in South Jailolo Sub-district of West Halmahera, North Moluccas. Bonorowo Wetlands 2: 19-30. Mangrove ecosystem in South Jailolo District has many functions for coastal area. This is a concern because the extent of mangrove ecosystems decreases from year to year due to the exploitation and conversion for various purposes without considering the ecological functions and physical function of mangrove ecosystems. This research aims to describe potential and existing condition of mangrove ecosystem and also to give directive policy strategic for Management of mangrove ecosystem in this area. This study aims to determine the condition of mangrove ecosystems in the District of South Jailolo, assessing the potential ecological and economic impacts of mangrove ecosystems and how big a reduction in mangrove area over the past 17 years, and then set the strategy of sustainable management of mangrove ecosystems This research use primary and secondary data. Primer data gathering is done by sampling, field observation, questioner, and open interview ended and in depth interview in the research area. Secondary data gathering by unraveling various literature, and related institution. Although the reduction in mangrove forest area is still in small quantities, to maintain the sustainability and ecological function it needs to management strategies. Results of analysis for management strategies found that is conservation to preserve the mangrove ecosystem area (34%), managing the mangrove ecosystem as ecotourism (32%), conservation of mangrove land as aquaculture area (21%) and make local regulations for the management of mangrove ecosystems (13%).
37
Rahmila, Yulizar Ihrami, Lilik Budi Prasetyo, Cecep Kusmana, Yudi Setiawan, Suyadi, Lisna Efiyanti, Dian Anggraini Indrawan et al. "Determination of Health Index Classification and Management Sustainable Mangrove Ecosystems Using a Combination of Fuzzy and ISM Methods". IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1266, n. 1 (1 dicembre 2023): 012087. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1266/1/012087.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Abstract The area of mangrove forests in Indonesia in 2021, according to the Ministry of Environment and Forestry, is around 3,364,080 Ha; this amount is equivalent to 23% of the world’s mangrove ecosystem, which is from a total of 16,530,000 Ha (FAO, 2005). Information on the condition of mangrove ecosystems is important to know whether or not an area is good. Studies related to the condition of mangrove ecosystems based on environmental quality and mangrove health index to determine the environmental quality and mangrove health are needed for ecosystem management in the future. This article describes the health parameters of mangrove ecosystems that will be analyzed with the help of a combination of decision support software such as fuzzy and ISM so that priority mangrove ecosystem locations can be determined, mangrove health index values to determine the health status of mangrove ecosystems and determine alternative sustainable mangrove ecosystem management policies that will be applied to the object of study. In addition, the study also discusses the concept of determining standard criteria for the level of damage to mangrove ecosystems and determining the status of mangrove ecosystems. Based on fuzzy logic, data analysis shows that the output of the Mangrove Health Index can be determined with 3 variables and 27 rules, with key factors in Mangrove Density, Canopy Cover and Number of saplings. The results of ISM show that management institutions that must be actively involved in supporting the success of sustainable mangrove forest ecosystem management in Batam City are KLHK, DLHK Riau Islands Province, and BPDAS Sei Jang Duriangkang. Proper handling of constraints and management institutions that are actively involved in mangrove forest ecosystem management will ultimately encourage budget effectiveness and efficiency to meet the main goal, namely sustainable mangrove forest ecosystem management in Batam City.
38
Minicheva, Galyna, Viktor Demchenko e Yevhen Sokolov. "Integrative ecological management of coastal marine and limans ecosystems of Ukraine". E3S Web of Conferences 255 (2021): 01008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125501008.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Based on the experience of managing coastal marine, and limans ecosystems of Ukraine, the theoretical scheme of Integrative Ecological Management is considered. The scheme includes the “Basic Diagnostic” block for which the key tools are: Basin Assessment, Ecosystem Approach and Ecosystem Services. Geo-information Technologies are demonstrated in order to assess the catchment areas of some limans and coastal marine ecosystems of Ukraine. With the ecosystem approach, it is necessary to use functional indicators for assessing autotrophic, heterotrophic and decomposer communities of the ecosystem, the bind of which is associated with Ecological Status of the water body. It is indicated that an important goal of environmental management is reducing the intensity of anthropogenic flows of substance and energy, which cause destruction of the ecological balance and devaluation of ecosystem services. For the second block of the scheme - “Decision Making” it is proposed to use Priority Management Algorithm principle as an effective tool which allows to achieve the target maximum at minimal cost. At the final stage of the “Target Result”, recommendations that are offered to stakeholders at the local, regional and national level must achievement the main objectives of the Integrative Ecological Management of coastal marine ecosystems and limans.
39
Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos, Aline Mariane de Faria, Felipe Mendes Borini, Ximena Alejandra Flechas Chaparro, Matheus Graciani dos Santos e Guilherme Soares Gurgel Amaral. "Dispersed knowledge management in ecosystems". Journal of Knowledge Management 25, n. 4 (25 marzo 2021): 796–825. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jkm-03-2020-0239.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Purpose Accessing and sharing dispersed knowledge in ecosystems is neither easy nor automatic. In ecosystems, focal firms should purposely create the right conditions and act to deal with dispersed knowledge. This study aims to investigate how focal firms manage dispersed knowledge in ecosystems characterized by a set of autonomous, heterogeneous, yet interdependent actors involved in experimentation under uncertainty. Design/methodology/approach Following a conceptual framework based on preceding literature, this study conducted a broad qualitative case study of 6 firms and 12 projects, with 43 semi-structured interviews to identify the patterns of actions associated with dispersed knowledge management (KM) in ecosystems. This paper combines coding and multiple case comparisons to examine the processes and strategies used by the firms to strategically manage dispersed knowledge in ecosystems. Findings This paper proposes a framework that articulates a new type of orchestration (dispersed knowledge orchestration) and offers a new set of dispersed knowledge strategies (transfer, modularity and circular) for ecosystems. Practical implications Innovation and knowledge managers play the roles of dispersed knowledge orchestrators. The study offers guidance on how focal firms should carefully use a particular set of approaches (e.g. integrative theorization) including a portfolio of dispersed knowledge strategies in ecosystems. Originality/value Current literature on KM and ecosystem management offers a limited understanding of how organizations manage dispersed knowledge in ecosystems. The research provides three major original contributions. First, the framework contributes to broadening the current understanding of ecosystem orchestration by identifying the micro-foundations of dispersed knowledge orchestration: integrative theorization, nurturing distributed sensemaking and a new chapter for ecosystem governance (i.e. dispersed knowledge governance). Moreover, the framework proposes a new type of strategy, the dispersed knowledge strategy. Finally, by exploring the interplay between the micro-foundations of dispersed knowledge orchestration and dispersed knowledge strategy, the results contribute to a multi-level approach in the field.
40
Hanifah, Abu, Sukendi Sukendi, Thamrin Thamrin e Ridwan Manda Putra. "Mangrove Ecosystem Management for Sustainable Renewable Energy Production: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis". International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 13, n. 5 (16 settembre 2023): 585–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.14299.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Mangrove ecosystems have become a critical habitat for sustaining renewable energy production, and their management is essential to maintain their ecological, economic, and social functions. This study aimed to analyze the multidimensional aspects of mangrove ecosystem management for sustainable renewable energy production in the Tebing Tinggi, Kepulauan Meranti, Riau. This study formulates sustainable management schemes for the mangrove ecosystem in the Tebing Tinggi, Kepulauan Meranti, Riau by analyzing the ecological, economic, social, legal-institutional, and technological aspects of the ecosystem. To conduct this analysis, researchers used the Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) approach, which relies on an algorithm called the MDS algorithm. The findings from the study reveal that the use of mangroves can increase people's income, but the level of community education is still low, and there is a lack of community participation in mangrove ecosystem management activities. Based on the Rap-Mangrove analysis, the multidimensional index of mangrove ecosystem management is considered sufficiently sustainable. The findings emphasized the significance of community participation and education in managing mangrove ecosystems. The study concludes that sustainable management schemes for mangrove ecosystems are necessary to ensure their continued contribution to renewable energy production.
41
Dell'Apa, Andrea, Joshua P. Kilborn e William J. Harford. "Advancing ecosystem management strategies for the Gulf of Mexico's fisheries resources: implications for the development of a fishery ecosystem plan". Bulletin of Marine Science 96, n. 4 (1 ottobre 2020): 617–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.5343/bms.2019.0081.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Recent global improvements to fisheries sustainability have been made through the adoption of more holistic management frameworks, such as the ecosystem approach to fisheries management (EAFM) and ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM), and a concurrent transition from a focus on single species or stocks to multispecies and ecosystems. In the US, federal and regional fisheries management encompass multiple layers of comprehensive, ecosystem focused management strategies for living marine resources within its network of large marine ecosystems (LMEs). Here, we provide an overview for the US portion of the Gulf of Mexico large marine ecosystem (GOM-LME) by examining multiple aspects of its fishery management scheme through the lenses of EAFM, EBFM, and the integrated ecosystem assessment (IEA) framework that has been used worldwide to advise, inform, and operationalize ecosystem management. The US-GOM's fishery management and ecosystem community appears to be keeping pace with other US regional efforts. However, more tools like fishery ecosystem plans (FEPs), which are conducive to the effective integration of ecosystem considerations into fishery management processes, are needed to inform and guide the work of regional managers, decision-makers, and stakeholders. Therefore, we propose a structured planning process aimed at advancing the development and implementation of a GOM-FEP, and describe two case studies of EAFM and EBFM applications, respectively, that can help to navigate through our proposed planning process. This work offers strategic guidance and insights to support efforts of regional fishery managers to translate ecosystem management principles, approaches, and objectives into an "action oriented" FEP in the GOM-LME.
42
Rudianto, Rudianto. "Restorasi Ekosistem Mangrove Desa Pesisir Berbasis Co-Management". Jurnal Perikanan Universitas Gadjah Mada 20, n. 1 (27 maggio 2018): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.22146/jfs.25841.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
The purpose of the research was to reorder the mangrove ecosystem restoration of coastal villages in order to overcome the damage coastal environments that have been damaged as a result of changes in land use. Data collection was done by using questionnaires and interviews with stakeholders. The study was conducted for three years from 2013 until 2016 with locations in Gresik and Malang districts. Data analysis was done by Partial Least Square and Analytical Hierarchy Process method to find out the priority order of restoration of the coastal ecosystem. In addition to SWOT analysis was conducted to determine the institutional capacity of the village and which would be responsible for restoring coastal ecosystems. The results show that the order of handling on coastal ecosystem damage was firstly mangrove forest, secondly coral reef, thirdly estuary area and fourthly seagrass area. Institutions responsible for handling the level of damage to coastal ecosystems was a village government, which was supported by the regional work units (SKPD) at the district level. Besides that, the role of government, private and community became the key to success on the successful implementation of restoration. Technical manual implementation of Coastal Ecosystem restoration-based co-management was necessary for the restoration of coastal ecosystems.
43
Likens, Gene E., Keith F. Walker, Peter E. Davies, Justin Brookes, Jon Olley, William J. Young, Martin C. Thoms et al. "Ecosystem science: toward a new paradigm for managing Australia's inland aquatic ecosystems". Marine and Freshwater Research 60, n. 3 (2009): 271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/mf08188.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Freshwater ecosystems are a foundation of our social, cultural, spiritual and economic well being. The degraded condition of many of Australia’s river ecosystems is testament to our failure to manage these resources wisely. Ecosystem science involves the holistic study of complex biophysical systems to understand the drivers that influence ecological pattern and process. Ecosystem science should underpin both water management and policy. Our understanding of aquatic ecosystems lags behind the increasing problems caused by past land and water management. Current post-graduate training programmes will not provide the aquatic ecosystem scientists needed by government and management agencies to prevent further degradation. We advocate new initiatives to capture the skills, knowledge and innovation of our research community by engaging scientists and managers in large-scale, long-term ecosystem science programmes across Australia and to integrate these programmes with community aspirations, policy, planning and management. We call on management agencies to increase their support for and uptake and use of ecosystem science. We also advocate establishment of national archives for long-term ecologically-relevant data and samples, and clear custodial arrangements to protect, update and facilitate knowledge-transfer. These initiatives need to be supported by more extensive, better-funded post-graduate and post-doctoral programmes in ecosystem science and management.
44
Markova, V. D., e S. A. Kuznetsova. "STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT IN ECOSYSTEMS: ANALYSIS OF THE RUSSIAN EXPERIENCE". Strategic decisions and risk management 12, n. 3 (11 febbraio 2022): 242–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.17747/2618-947x-2021-3-242-251.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Ecosystems as new organizational forms of business, whose activity generates changes in the theory and practice of management, have become a significant phenomenon of the modern economy. The article discusses the features of the strategy development of ecosystems based on digital platforms, the typology of strategies and the directions of classical approaches transformation to the strategic development of ecosystem players. The research methodology includes the analysis of scientific approaches within the framework of the emerging ecosystem theory as well as the systematization of the national digital ecosystems’ practice based on the analysis of real situations from various spheres of Russian business. As a result of the analytical study, the multi-vector strategies of Russian ecosystems are described; the dominant directions of development in transaction ecosystems and decision ecosystems are identified and systematized on the basis of the Ansoff matrix. The directions of transformation of traditional methods and tools of strategic management in a broad context are revealed from the standpoint of market and intra-ecosystem interactions. The obtained results contribute to the urgent scientific discussions concerning the prospects and limitations of the digital ecosystems development, changes in the nature and models of competition, as well as the problems of traditional management methods transformation in the digital economy.
45
Kolomytseva, Olga, Inna Gunina, Elena Kolesnikova e Vera Agafonova. "Management of the innovative ecosystem development environment". E3S Web of Conferences 91 (2019): 08067. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20199108067.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
One of the key factors of innovative development is the availability of a favorable innovative environment ensuring the transformation of ideas and developments into market products, introduction of these products into most important branches of economics and social sphere, as well as allowing saving the unique set of scientific and engineering schools. But the key problem for implementation of effective innovations is the absence of favorable environment and innovative climate promoting creation of innovations, ensuring the growth of global competitive ability, labor productivity, and life quality of population. Thus, the formation and development of the innovative environment as the most important condition for implementation of effective innovations represents the actual scientific task of significant national economic importance. Digital technologies are best developed in a harmonious ecosystem. Nowadays, ecosystem-based projects are becoming more popular, when a community of people connected by common interests is formed; the economy is very rapidly migrating into the history of ecosystems. In the next 10 years, we should expect the competition of ecosystems, digital platforms integrated between each other: in the upcoming global digital economy, that economic contour will win, which will be the fastest growing in the number and quality of digital platforms integrated into a single ecosystem. That is, the digital economy should be seen as an ecosystem economy.
46
Choruma, Dennis Junior, e Oghenekaro Nelson Odume. "Exploring Farmers’ Management Practices and Values of Ecosystem Services in an Agroecosystem Context—A Case Study from the Eastern Cape, South Africa". Sustainability 11, n. 23 (21 novembre 2019): 6567. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11236567.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Globally, farmers remain the key ecosystem managers responsible for increasing food production while simultaneously reducing the associated negative environmental impacts. However, research investigating how farmers’ agricultural management practices are influenced by the values they assign to ecosystem services is scarce in South Africa. To address this gap, a survey of farmers’ agricultural management practices and the values they assigned towards ecosystem services was conducted in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Results from the survey show that farmers assign a high value on food provisioning ecosystem services compared to other ecosystem services. Irrigation and fertiliser decisions were mostly based on achieving maximum crop yields or good crop quality. The majority of farmers (86%) indicated a willingness to receive payments for ecosystem services (PES) to manage their farms in a more ecosystems-oriented manner. To encourage farmers to shift from managing ecosystems for single ecosystem services such as food provision to managing ecosystems for multiple ecosystem services, market-oriented plans such as PES may be employed. Effective measures for sustainable intensification of food production will depend on the inclusion of farmers in the development of land management strategies and practices as well as increasing farmers’ awareness and knowledge of the ecosystem services concept.
47
Warner, Philip, Jamel Banton, David Smith e Renée McDonald Lyn Shue. "ROCK ARMOUR: A BENTHIC HABITAT PROVIDING VALUABLE ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN THE CARIBBEAN SEA". Coastal Engineering Proceedings, n. 37 (1 settembre 2023): 95. http://dx.doi.org/10.9753/icce.v37.management.95.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
This paper describes our findings from ecological surveys at several shoreline and beach enhancement projects in the Caribbean. Using standard fish abundance and diversity surveys and benthic habitat mapping protocols, we track how rock armour transitions from a barren substrate at installation to a diverse marine ecosystem over time. The ecosystem services provided by the rock armour have been evaluated and compare well with naturally occurring habitats. Using available economic benefit analyses, we estimate the value of these ecosystem services at various stages as the rock armour habitat matures.
48
Parsons, Scott. "Ecosystem Considerations in Fisheries Management: Theory and Practice". International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 20, n. 3 (2005): 381–422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157180805775098568.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
AbstractThis article examines recent developments with respect to the development and application of an ecosystem approach in marine fisheries management. A number of international fisheries legal instruments now include explicit references to ecosystem considerations. While there has been general agreement on the need to take ecosystem considerations into account, there is no clarity or consensus on how this can best be done. Various definitions of an ecosystem approach emphasise that the focus must be on managing the human activities, which are part of, and impact on, marine ecosystems. An ecosystem approach is neither inconsistent with, nor a replacement for, existing fisheries management approaches—it is not a panacea for the problems confronting world fisheries. Realistically, we can only move to an ecosystem approach incrementally, starting with more rigorous/cautious application and extension of single species methods. A key element of any ecosystem approach will likely be to set harvest rates for target species at even lower conservative levels than might be suggested by single species analysis. Fisheries management measures should also ensure the protection not only of target species, but also of non-target, associated or dependent species. Reducing the killing power of the world's fishing fleets is an essential component of ecosystem-based fisheries management.
49
Asadli, Nijat I. "ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT OF CUSTOMER-ORIENTED MANAGEMENT". Scientific Review. Series 1. Economics and Law, n. 4 (2020): 59–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.26653/2076-4650-2020-4-05.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
The digital age is beginning to transform itself and offer new ways of organizing value creation. For an ordinary consumer, these processes were characterized by closer attention and already indisputable inclusion of the consumer in many enterprise management processes, including, among other things, strategic decisions. As a result, new consumer-driven value creation processes lead from value chains to digital ecosystems. Industrial giants are giving way to a new type of enterprise, such as Apple and Alibaba, that rely on the power of their digital ecosystems to achieve market dominance. Without understanding what digital ecosystems are and how they function, it is impossible to create modern customer-centric management. Many new smaller companies emerging in current markets are interested in how organizations other than these giants can play with the ecosystem paradigm. The motivation for creating the framework presented in this article, and the research behind it, is to foster a better understanding of the concept of digital ecosystems.
50
Bystryakov, Igor, e Dmitry Klynovyi. "BYSUNESS-ECOSYSTEM CONCEPT OF SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT". Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development, n. 8(27) (2020): 21–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.37100/2616-7689/2020/8(27)/3.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
The purpose of the article is to define an innovative concept of sustainable management based on the analysis of the institutional configuration of business ecosystem entities. The concept of sustainable (SUST) management is outlined as the creation of conditions for multi-entity management of territorial capital on the basis of digital platform technologies and the principles of partnership between government, business and the population. The institutional configuration of territorial business ecosystems is analyzed. It is determined that the business-ecosystem organization of economic activity is a flexible and dynamic system that creates opportunities for the integration of natural resources into economic circulation in territorial communities. It is established that there is a need for a radical restructuring of the institutional configuration of the spatial management system of natural resources in the direction of creating a system of multi-entity management of territorial capital. The main institutions and institutes of the spatial system of natural resources management of the territorial business ecosystem are outlined, in the field of local government, public-private partnership, corporate-platform and structural-project management, etc., within which economic actors of business ecosystems are endowed with appropriate functions and powers.. The structure of the business-ecosystem concept of sustainable management is detailed, including the basic formats of institutionalization of territorial assets management, informational and communicational platform component and management mechanisms of sustainable management, which are focused on creating a system of multi-entity management of sustainable development of territorial communities. Basic formats and forms of institutionalization of territorial assets management in the conditions of decentralization of power are proposed, including communication platforms of collaborative interactions between public authorities, business and population, as well as a set of mechanisms of structural and project management of sustainable development of territorial communities.