Letteratura scientifica selezionata sul tema "Comparative law of contracts"
Cita una fonte nei formati APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard e in molti altri stili
Consulta la lista di attuali articoli, libri, tesi, atti di convegni e altre fonti scientifiche attinenti al tema "Comparative law of contracts".
Accanto a ogni fonte nell'elenco di riferimenti c'è un pulsante "Aggiungi alla bibliografia". Premilo e genereremo automaticamente la citazione bibliografica dell'opera scelta nello stile citazionale di cui hai bisogno: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver ecc.
Puoi anche scaricare il testo completo della pubblicazione scientifica nel formato .pdf e leggere online l'abstract (il sommario) dell'opera se è presente nei metadati.
Articoli di riviste sul tema "Comparative law of contracts"
Rösler, Hannes. "Hardship in German Codified Private Law – In Comparative Perspective to English, French and International Contract Law". European Review of Private Law 15, Issue 4 (1 agosto 2007): 483–513. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/erpl2007028.
Testo completoUrazbaevna, Tulepova Zulfiya. "THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CONTRACTS AND DEALS IN THE CIVIL LAW OF UZBEKISTAN". American Journal Of Philological Sciences 03, n. 03 (1 marzo 2023): 39–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.37547/ajps/volume03issue03-07.
Testo completoOng, Jason Pratama. "The Enforceability of Digital Contract: A Comparative Analysis on Indonesia and New Zealand Law". Lawpreneurship Journal 1, n. 1 (3 marzo 2021): 30–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.21632/tlj.1.1.30-42.
Testo completoEller, Klaas Hendrik. "Comparative Genealogies of “Contract and Society”". German Law Journal 21, n. 7 (ottobre 2020): 1393–410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.84.
Testo completoLiçenji, Anjeza, e Vitiana Pitaku. "A Comparative Analysis of Donation Contract in Albanian and Italian Contract Law". European Journal of Economics, Law and Social Sciences 8, n. 2 (1 giugno 2024): 40–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/ejels-2024-0008.
Testo completoŠtemberger Brizani, Katja. "Changed Circumstances and Concession Contracts: Slovenian Law in a Comparative Perspective". Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu 71, n. 4 (20 dicembre 2023): 669–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfbu_23402a.
Testo completoShhadah Alhussein, Hussein, Zlatan Meskic e Ahmad Al-Rushoud. "Sustainability and Challenges of Arbitration in Administrative Contracts: the Concept and Approach in Saudi and Comparative Law". Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 6, n. 5 (5 aprile 2023): 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.33327/ajee-18-6s004.
Testo completoHerbots, Jacques. "Un aperçu du droit chinois des contrats". European Review of Private Law 18, Issue 5 (1 ottobre 2010): 915–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/erpl2010070.
Testo completovan Deventer, Sanmarie. "Problems relating to the formation of online contracts: A comparative perspective". South African Law Journal 139, n. 1 (2022): 32–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.47348/salj/v139/i1a2.
Testo completoDemark, Armando, e Josip Dešić. "PRIVIDNI UGOVORI IZMEĐU NIŠTETNOSTI I NEPOSTOJANJA". Pravni vjesnik 39, n. 3-4 (dicembre 2023): 7–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.25234/pv/25648.
Testo completoTesi sul tema "Comparative law of contracts"
Lin, Ching-Lang. "Arbitration in administrative contracts : comparative law perspective". Thesis, Paris, Institut d'études politiques, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014IEPP0023/document.
Testo completoWhile arbitration has traditionally been considered as a means to resolve private disputes, its role in disputes involving administrative contracts is a crucial question in administrative law. In brief, the three specific questions are (1) Can arbitrators or arbitral tribunals decide issues involving administrative law? and (2) Is there, or should there be, any limitation on the authority of arbitrators or arbitral tribunals? (3) Moreover, after the issue of an arbitration award, what role should the State play in the judicial review phase? The first question, the issue of arbitrability, is discussed in part 1 (FIRST PART: ARBITRABILITY). The second question will be discussed in part2 (SECOND PART: PARTICULAR QUESTIONS OF ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS IN ARBITRATION PROCEDURE). Finally, on the question of what happens after the arbitration award, we will discuss judicial review in part 3 (THIRD PART: JUDICIAL REVIEW AND EXECUTION OF ARBITRATION AWARD). We compare legal systems between the four countries: in France, in Canada, in China and in Taiwan. We believe that an administrative contract, at least in its function and conception, is gradually becoming different from a private contract. Innovation with respect to administrative contracts will also reflect the concentration and function of the administrative litigation systems in each country. In addition, the “objective” or “subjective” function of administrative litigation will also affect the degree of arbitrability, as well as arbitration procedures. Taken together, arbitration will be more acceptable in systems whose function is more “subjectively oriented” than in those whose function is “objectively oriented". Finally, “the arbitration of administrative matters” traditionally has been an important question in administrative and arbitration law. In the future, we will continue to see it shine in the doctrine and jurisprudence of both the administrative and arbitration law fields
Al-Hajeri, Abdul-Rahman R. "Sanctions in public works contracts : a comparative study". Thesis, King's College London (University of London), 1995. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.261869.
Testo completoWatt, Ilze Jr. "The consequences of contracts concluded by unassisted minors : a comparative evaluation". Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/71723.
Testo completoIncludes bibliography
ENGLISH ABSTRACT: It is a general principle of the law of South Africa that an unassisted contract of a minor is unenforceable against the minor. Although it binds the other party, the minor is not bound. The minor will only be bound if the contract is enforced by his guardian, or if the contract is ratified by the child after attaining majority. This implies that the other party is in a rather unfortunate position, since the effectiveness of the contract will remain uncertain until the guardian of the minor decides to enforce or repudiate the contract, or until the minor ratifies it after attaining majority. The other party may not resile from the contract during this interim period. Should it be established that the contract has failed, the question arises to what extent the parties are obliged to return performances made in purported fulfilment of the contract. In terms of the law of South Africa, the prevailing view is that these claims are based on unjustified enrichment. However, the extent of these claims differs. In principle, both parties’ liability will be limited to the amount remaining in its estate, according to the defence of loss of enrichment. But the application of the defence is subject to an exception that does not apply equally to the parties. Had the other party known or should the other party have known that the enrichment was sine causa, yet continued to part with it, he will be held liable for the full enrichment. However, this exception does not apply to the enrichment liability of minors. In other words, whether the minor knew or should have known that the enrichment was sine causa, he would still be allowed to raise the defence of loss of enrichment. Furthermore, the rules applicable to minors’ enrichment liability applies to all minors, and no scope is left to consider the specific circumstances of each minor. It is accepted that there are two competing principles relating to minors’ unassisted contracts. On the one hand, the law must protect the minor from his immaturity and lack of experience. On the other hand, the law must protect the interests of the other party. It will be seen throughout this study that the determination of how to balance these competing principles is not an easy task. The key aim of this thesis is to investigate the principles governing the unwinding of unassisted minors’ contracts in South Africa. A comparison will be made with the principles applied in other legal systems, in order to identify similarities and differences in the approaches and, to establish what underlies the differences in the various approaches. Germany, England and Scotland have been chosen for comparison for various reasons. First, they share some historical roots, and they represent three major legal traditions, namely the civil law, common law and mixed legal systems, of which South Africa also forms part. Secondly, both England and Scotland have experienced recent legislative reform in this regard, which implies that their respective legal systems should be in line with modern tendencies, and consequently they may provide a valuable framework for possible reform in South Africa. In Germany, although mainly regulated by rather older legislation, there have been interesting developments in the determination of consequences of failed contracts. Hellwege has argued that the unwinding of all contracts should be treated similarly, regardless of the unwinding factor. He has also suggested that in order to prevent the accumulation of risk on one party, and to ensure that the risk is placed on the person who is in control of the object, the defence of loss of enrichment should not be available to any party. His reasoning and suggestions is dealt with in more detail in this thesis. This study argues that the current strict approach applied under South African law regarding minors’ unassisted contracts needs to be re-considered. The current approach is dated and is not in line with modern tendencies and legislation. No proper consideration is given to minors’ development into adulthood or personal circumstances of the parties. It is submitted that in the process of re-consideration, some form of acknowledgement must be given to minors’ development towards mature adults. It is submitted that this would be possible by introducing a more flexible approach to regulate the enforceability and unwinding of minors’ unassisted contracts.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING Dit is ‘n algemene beginsel van die Suid-Afrikaanse reg dat ‘n kontrak aangegaan deur ‘n minderjarige sonder die nodige bystand van sy ouer of voog onafdwingbaar is teenoor die minderjarige. Die minderjarige sal slegs gebonde wees indien die kontrak afgedwing word deur sy voog, of indien die minderjarige self die kontrak ratifiseer nadat hy meerderjarig word. Dit impliseer dat die ander party in ‘n ongunstige posisie is, aangesien die werking van die kontrak onseker is totdat die voog besluit om die kontrak af te dwing of te repudieer, of totdat die minderjarige dit ratifiseer nadat hy meerderjarig word. Gedurende hierdie interim periode mag die ander party nie terugtree uit hierdie kontrak nie. Sou dit bepaal word dat die kontrak misluk het, ontstaan die vraag tot watter mate die partye verplig word om prestasies wat reeds gemaak is, terug te gee. In terme van die Suid-Afrikaanse reg is die meerderheidsopinie dat hierdie eise gebaseer is op onregverdige verryking, maar die omvang van die partye se eise verskil. In beginsel is beide partye se aanspreeklikheid beperk tot die bedrag wat steeds in sy boedel beskikbaar is, weens die beskikbaarheid van die verweer van verlies van verryking. Maar die toepassing van die verweer is onderworpe aan ‘n uitsondering wat nie op beide partye geld nie. Indien die ander party geweet het of moes geweet het dat die verryking sine causa was, maar steeds afstand gedoen het van die verryking, sal hy aanspreeklik gehou word vir die volle verryking. Hierdie reel is egter nie van toepassing op die minderjarige se verrykingsaanspreeklikheid nie. Met ander woorde, indien die minderjarige geweet het of moes geweet het dat die verryking sine causa was, en steeds afstand gedoen het van die verryking, sal hy steeds die verweer van verlies van verryking kan opper. Bowendien, die reels van toepassing op minderjariges se verrykingsaanspreeklikheid is van toepassing op alle minderjariges, en geen ruimte word gelaat om die spesifieke omstandighede van elke minderjarige in ag te neem nie. Wanneer ons kontrakte aangegaan deur minderjariges sonder die nodige bystand, oorweeg, word dit algemeen aanvaar dat daar twee kompeterende beginsels van belang is. Aan die een kant moet die reg die minderjarige beskerm teen sy onvolwassenheid en gebrek aan ondervinding. Aan die ander kant moet die reg ook die belange van die ander party beskerm. Dit sal deurlopend in hierdie studie gesien word dat die behoorlike balansering van hierdie twee beginsels nie ‘n maklike taak is nie. Die hoofdoel van hierdie tesis is om die beginsels wat die afdwingbaarheid en ontbinding van minderjariges se kontrakte in Suid-Afrika, wat aangegaan is sonder die nodige bystand van ‘n voog, te ondersoek. ‘n Vergelyking sal getref word met die beginsels wat in ander regstelsels toegepas word, om sodoende die ooreenkomste en verskille te identifiseer, asook om te bepaal wat hierdie verskille onderlê. Duitsland, Engeland en Skotland is gekies as vergelykende jurisdiksies vir verskeie redes, naamlik hulle historiese gebondenheid en die feit dat hulle drie groot regstradisies (die kontinentale regstelsel, die gemenereg en die gemengde regstelsel) verteenwoordig. Bowendien het beide Engeland en Skotland onlangse wetgewende hervorming ondergaan in hierdie sfeer van die reg, wat impliseer dat hierdie regstelsels waarskynlik in lyn sal wees met moderne tendense. Gevolglik kan hulle ‘n waardevolle raamwerk skep waarbinne moontlike hervorming in Suid-Afrika mag plaasvind. Alhoewel Duitsland grotendeels nog deur ouer wetgewing gereguleer word, het dit ook ‘n reeks interessante verwikkelinge ondergaan in die bepaling van die gevolge van kontrakte wat misluk het. Hellwege argumenteer dat die ontbinding van alle kontrakte dieselfde hanteer moet word, ongeag die onderliggende ontbindende faktor. Hy stel ook voor dat om te verhoed dat die risiko op slegs een party geplaas word, en om te verseker dat dit eerder gedra word deur daardie party wat beheer het oor die voorwerp, die verweer van verlies van verryking nie vir enige party beskikbaar moet wees nie. Sy redenering en voorstelle word in meer besonderhede in hierdie studie bespreek. Hierdie studie argumenteer dat die huidige streng benadering wat in Suid-Afrika toegepas word met betrekking tot kontrakte aangegaan deur minderjariges sonder die nodige bystand van ‘n voog, heroorweeg moet word. Die huidige benadering is verouderd en is nie lyn met moderne tendense en wetgewing nie. Bowendien word geen behoorlike oorweging gegee aan minderjariges se ontwikkeling tot volwassenheid nie, en die partye se persoonlike omstandighede word ook nie in ag geneem nie. Daar word argumenteer dat in die proses van heroorweging, ‘n mate van erkenning gegee moet word aan minderjariges se persoonlike ontwikkeling. Daar word verder argumenteer dat ‘n meer buigsame benadering toegepas moet word ten opsigte van die regulering van die afdwingbaarheid en ontbinding van hierdie kontrakte.
Albrecht, Andreas. "Third party rights under inter-bank contracts : a comparative study". Thesis, McGill University, 1985. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=63390.
Testo completoKennefick, Ciara M. "Unfair prices in contracts in English and French law". Thesis, University of Oxford, 2013. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:b162d4c6-66f8-4687-a6af-e0418b06c549.
Testo completoWhittaker, Simon John. "The relationship between contract and tort : a comparative study of French and English law". Thesis, University of Oxford, 1987. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.670368.
Testo completoNaude, Tjakie. "The legal nature of preference contracts". Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/53655.
Testo completoENGLISH ABSTRACT: The various constructions of rights of pre-emption encountered in South African case law all have some merit. This is confirmed by the multiplicity of types of preference contracts encountered in German law especially. The tendency of South African courts and writers to portray one approach as the only correct one to the exclusion of all other views, results in tension and confusion, all the more because of the failure to investigate the relevant policy considerations comprehensively. The confusion is compounded by what amounts to a breakdown of the system of precedents with judgments being based on incorrect interpretations of previous decisions and with scant regard for contrary decisions. No certainty exists regarding the construction of the contractual right of pre-emption in Roman and Roman-Dutch law, nor is it clear what figure or figures were received into South African law. The Germanic concept of tiered ownership that forms the historical basis for the Oryx remedy, does not form part of our law. This accounts for the difficulty that courts and writers have in explaining this remedy in terms of Romanist terminology, and the resort to the language of fiction. German law and English law, relied upon in South African case law, do not support a uniform construction of all rights of pre-emption as creating an enforceable duty to make an offer upon manifestation of a desire to sell. The almost unanimous support of US courts for a remedy by which the holder can ultimately obtain performance of the main contract upon conclusion of a contract with a third party, challenges the hypothesis suggested by German law that the default construction of preference contracts should be the bare preference contract which only creates a negative obligation. The very cryptic way in which rights of pre-emption are normally drafted, makes it difficult to even identify the main purpose of the parties. It is therefore not easy to classify preference contracts into the different types identified in this study as notional possibilities. A default regime is therefore highly desirable in the interest of legal certainty. The choice of a default regime should be made on the basis of recognised policy considerations, particularly on the basis of an equitable balancing of typical parties' interests and in view of communal interests balanced against the demand for legal certainty. The choice of default regime cannot be based merely on historical authority or precedent (which is in any event unclear in the present context) or unsubstantiated claims that one model is more logical or commercially useful than another. When rules are chosen as the default regime, these rules must, as far as possible, be reconciled with the existing conceptual structure of our law to prevent contradictions and inconsistencies. A policy analysis reveals that three default types of preference contract should be recognised, each with a clearly delineated field of application. Firstly, where the agreement allows the grantor to contract with a third party, the holder has the right to contract with the grantor at the terms agreed with the third party. Such a preference contract can therefore be regarded as an option conditional upon conclusion of a contract with a third party. Such contracts are rare in South Africa. In other cases, the default rule should be that the grantor must first give the holder an opportunity to contract before he contracts with a third party. The default construction of this latter type of preference contracts depends on whether the preference contract itself predetermines the main contract price. If so, the holder has a right or option to contract at that price upon any manifestation of a desire to conclude the relevant type of contract. However, where the preference contract does not predetermine the price, or refers to a price that the grantor would accept from third parties, any manifestation of a desire to sell should not be sufficient to trigger the holder's right. The grantor and society have an interest in having her freedom to negotiate with third parties to obtain the best possible price curtailed as little as possible. In such cases, the default rule should be that the holder is only entitled to conclusion of the main contract upon breach in the form of a contract with or offer to a third party. The default rule should also be that such preference contracts - which will be treated as ordinary preference contracts - only terminate upon the grantor actually contracting with and performing to a third party within a reasonable time after the holder declined the opportunity to match those terms, and provided the identity of the third party was disclosed to the holder on request. The holder therefore cannot lose his preferential right by a rejection of an outrageously high offer by the grantor. Options and preference contracts are closely related and overlapping concepts. The type of preference contract that grants a conditional right to contract can often be understood as a conditional option (or at least as a conditional option subject to a resolutive condition that the grantor does not want to contract anymore). The traditional distinction between options and rights of first refusal can only be maintained in respect of some types of preference contracts. These are negative or bare preference contracts which only give rise to remedies aimed at restoring the status quo ante the breach, as well as those preference contracts creating conditional rights to contract which courts refuse to treat as conditional options because their wording implies a duty to make or accept an offer, or because the requirement of certainty precludes them from being options.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Die verskillende konstruksies van voorkoopsregte aanvaar III Suid-Afrikaanse beslissings het almal meriete. Dit word bevestig deur die verskillende tipes voorkoopskontrakte wat veral in die Duitse reg erken word. Die neiging van Suid- Afrikaanse howe en skrywers om een benadering as die enigste korrekte een te tipeer veroorsaak spanning en onsekerheid, des te meer weens die versuim om die relevante beleidsoorwegings deeglik te ondersoek. Boonop is die presedentestelsel telkens verontagsaam deur verkeerde interpretasies van vorige uitsprake en deurdat teenstrydige uitsprake bloot geïgnoreer is. Geen sekerheid bestaan oor die konstruksie van die kontraktuele voorkoopsreg in die Romeinse of Romeins-Hollandse Reg nie. Dit is ook nie duidelik watter figuur of figure in die Suid-Afrikaanse reg geresipieer is nie. Die Germaanse konsep van gesplitste eiendomsreg wat die historiese basis van die Oryx-meganisme daarstel, vorm nie deel van ons reg nie. Dit verduidelik hoekom howe en skrywers sukkel om dié remedie te verduidelik aan die hand van Romanistiese verbintenisreg-terminologie, en die gevolglike gebruikmaking van fiksie-taal. Die Duitse en Engelse reg waarop gesteun is in Suid-Afrikaanse regspraak, steun nie 'n uniforme konstruksie van alle voorkoopsregte as behelsende 'n afdwingbare plig om 'n aanbod te maak by enige manifestasie van 'n begeerte om te verkoop nie. Die byna eenparige steun van Noord-Amerikaanse howe vir 'n remedie waarmee die voorkoopsreghouer uiteindelik prestasie van die substantiewe kontrak kan kry by sluiting van 'n kontrak met 'n derde, is 'n teenvoeter vir die hipotese gesuggereer deur die Duitse reg dat die verstekkonstruksie van voorkeurkontrakte behoort te wees dat slegs 'n negatiewe verpligting geskep word. Die kriptiese wyse waarop voorkeurkontrakte normaalweg opgestel word, maak dit moeilik om selfs die hoofdoelstelling van die partye te identifiseer. Dit is daarom nie maklik om voorkeurkontrakte te klassifisieer in die verskillende tipes wat in hierdie studie geïdentifiseer is nie. 'n Verstekregime is daarom wenslik in die belang van regsekerheid. Die keuse van verstekregime behoort gemaak te word op die basis van erkende beleidsoorwegings, spesifiek op die basis van 'n billike balansering van tipiese partybelange en in die lig van gemeenskapsbelange gebalanseer teen die vereiste van regsekerheid. Die keuse van verstekregime kan nie gebaseer word bloot op historiese gesag en vorige beslissings nie (wat in elk geval in die huidige konteks onduidelik is). Dit kan ook nie gebaseer word op ongemotiveerde aansprake dat een model meer logies of kommersieël bruikbaar as 'n ander is nie. Wanneer verstekreëls gekies word moet dit, sover moontlik, versoen word met die bestaande begrippe-struktuur van ons reg om teenstrydighede in die sisteem te vermy. 'n Beleidsanalise laat blyk dat drie verstektipes voorkeurkontrakte erken behoort te word, elk met 'n duidelik afgebakende toepassingsveld. Eerstens, waar die ooreenkoms toelaat dat die voorkeurreggewer eers met 'n derde party kontrakteer, het die voorkeurreghouer 'n opsie om te kontrakteer op die terme ooreengekom met die derde. Die voorkeurkontrak kan daarom beskou word as 'n opsie onderhewig aan die voorwaarde van sluiting van 'n kontrak met 'n derde. Sulke kontrakte is raar in Suid- Afrika. In ander gevalle behoort die verstekreël te wees dat die voorkeurreggewer eers die houer 'n geleentheid moet gee om te kontrakteer voordat sy met 'n derde 'n kontrak aangaan. Die verstekkonstruksie van hierdie laasgenoemde tipe voorkeurkontrak hang daarvan af of die voorkeurkontrak self die substantiewe kontraksprys vasstel. Indien wel het die houer die reg of opsie om te kontrakteer teen daardie prys by enige manifestasie van 'n begeerte om die spesifieke soort kontrak te sluit. Maar waar die voorkeurkontrak nie die prys vasstel nie, of verwys na 'n prys wat die gewer sou aanvaar van 'n derde, behoort enige manifestasie van 'n begeerte om te kontrakteer nie genoeg te wees om die houer se reg afdwingbaar te maak nie. Die voorkeurreggewer en die gemeenskap het 'n belang daarby dat die gewer se vryheid om met derdes te onderhandel so min as moontlik beperk word sodat sy die beste moontlike prys kan kry. In sulke gevalle behoort die verstekreël te wees dat die houer slegs geregtig is op die voordeel van die substantiewe kontrak by kontrakbreuk in die vorm van 'n kontrak met of aanbod aan 'n derde. Die verstekreël behoort ook te wees dat sulke voorkeurkontrakte in beginsel slegs beëindig word wanneer die voorkeurreggewer inderdaad kontrakteer met en presteer aan 'n derde binne 'n redelike tyd nadat die voorkeurreghouer die geleentheid gegee is om daardie terme te ewenaar. Dit behoort ook vereis te word dat die identiteit van die derde aan die houer geopenbaar word op sy versoek. Die houer kan dus nie sy voorkeurreg verloor deur nie-aanvaarding van 'n belaglik hoë aanbod deur die voorkeurreggewer nie. Opsies en voorkeurkontrakte is oorvleulende konsepte. Die tipe voorkeurkontrak wat 'n voorwaardelike reg om te kontrakteer verleen kan dikwels verstaan word as 'n voorwaardelike opsie (of minstens as 'n voorwaardelike opsie onderhewig aan 'n ontbindende voorwaarde dat die gewer glad nie meer wil kontrakteer nie). Die tradisionele onderskeid tussen opsies en voorkeurregte kan slegs behou word tov sommige voorkeurkontrakte. Hulle is die "negatiewe" voorkeurkontrakte, wat slegs aanleiding gee tot remedies gemik op herstel van die status quo ante kontrakbreuk sowel as daarde voorkeurkontrakte wat voorwaardelike regte om te kontrakteer skep wat howe weier om as voorwaardelike opsies te behandelomdat hulle bewoording wys op 'n plig om 'n aanbod te maak of te aanvaar, of omdat die vereiste van sekerheid hulle verhoed om opsies te wees.
Alhowaimil, Ibrahim Saad. "Frustration of performance of contracts : a comparative and analytic study in Islamic law and English law". Thesis, Brunel University, 2013. http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8532.
Testo completoHabibzadeh, Taher. "Developing and modernizing Iranian law in the context of electronic contracts by a comparative study of UNCITRAL rules, English law, American law, EU law and Iranian law". Thesis, University of Manchester, 2014. https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/en/theses/developing-and-modernizing-iranian-law-in-the-context-of-electronic-contractsbya-comparative-study-of-uncitral-rules-english-law-american-law-eu-law-and-iranian-law(004e86e1-83a6-42f0-9e6b-d3f6270696ad).html.
Testo completoAyus, Abdul Mohaimin Bin Noordin. "Building contract claims a comparative study (Scotland, England and Malaysia) /". Thesis, Available from the University of Aberdeen Library and Historic Collections Digital Resources, 1992. http://digitool.abdn.ac.uk:80/webclient/DeliveryManager?application=DIGITOOL-3&owner=resourcediscovery&custom_att_2=simple_viewer&pid=59638.
Testo completoLibri sul tema "Comparative law of contracts"
University of Toronto. Faculty of Law, a cura di. Comparative contract law. Toronto]: Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, 1993.
Cerca il testo completoShalev, Gabriela. Comparative contract law. [Toronto]: Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, 2002.
Cerca il testo completoShalev, Gabriela. Comparative contract law. Toronto]: Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, 2002.
Cerca il testo completoShalev, Gabriela. Comparative contract law. [Toronto]: Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, 1993.
Cerca il testo completoStazi, Andrea. Smart Contracts and Comparative Law. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83240-7.
Testo completoContract law: A comparative introduction. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2014.
Cerca il testo completoHoecke, Mark van. Deep level comparative law. San Domenico, Florence: European University Institute, 2002.
Cerca il testo completoComparative contract law and economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2011.
Cerca il testo completoS, Markesinis B., e British Institute of International and Comparative Law, a cura di. Markets and comparative law. London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2010.
Cerca il testo completoMarsh, P. D. V. Comparative contract law: England, France, Germany. Aldershot, Hampshire, England: Gower, 1994.
Cerca il testo completoCapitoli di libri sul tema "Comparative law of contracts"
Graziano, Thomas Kadner. "Formation of contracts". In Comparative Contract Law, 49–219. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-87676-1_4.
Testo completoGraziano, Thomas Kadner. "Performance of contracts". In Comparative Contract Law, 221–404. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-87676-1_5.
Testo completoCalzolaio, Ermanno. "The formation of contracts". In Comparative Contract Law, 54–85. London: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003251606-4.
Testo completoStazi, Andrea. "Contract and Technology from Automatic to Telematic Contracts". In Smart Contracts and Comparative Law, 3–28. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83240-7_2.
Testo completoStazi, Andrea. "Introduction: Contract Automation and “Smart Contracts” in Comparative Law". In Smart Contracts and Comparative Law, 1–2. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83240-7_1.
Testo completoGraziano, Thomas Kadner. "The law applicable to cross-border contracts and the future of European contract law". In Comparative Contract Law, 405–502. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-87676-1_6.
Testo completoStazi, Andrea. "Conclusion". In Smart Contracts and Comparative Law, 143–46. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83240-7_6.
Testo completoStazi, Andrea. "Elements, Pathologies, and Remedies of Smart Contracts". In Smart Contracts and Comparative Law, 107–42. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83240-7_5.
Testo completoStazi, Andrea. "Peculiarities and Regulation of Electronic Bargaining". In Smart Contracts and Comparative Law, 29–69. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83240-7_3.
Testo completoStazi, Andrea. "Smart Contracts: Legal Issues and First Regulatory Approaches". In Smart Contracts and Comparative Law, 71–106. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83240-7_4.
Testo completoAtti di convegni sul tema "Comparative law of contracts"
Biczysko-Pudełko, K. "Algorithmic Contracts in European and United States Contract Law - A Comparative Legal Analysis". In 2023 46th MIPRO ICT and Electronics Convention (MIPRO). IEEE, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.23919/mipro57284.2023.10159844.
Testo completoHossen, Yehya. "A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON ARBITRARY CLAUSES OF E-COMMERCE CONTRACTS". In 2nd Law & Political Science Conference, Prague. International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.20472/lpc.2018.002.005.
Testo completoGolub, Jura. "CONTEMPORARY FORMS OF WORK WITH A DIGITAL FEATURE IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW". In International Scientific Conference on International, EU and Comparative Law Issues “Law in the Age of Modern Technologies”. Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.25234/eclic/28269.
Testo completoJarjis Khalaf Saleh, Firas, e Saja Omar Al Amr. "Conflict of Legislative and Judicial Jurisdiction in Electronic Contract Disputes - A Comparative Study". In II. Alanya International Congress of Social Sciences. Rimar Academy, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.47832/alanyacongress2-10.
Testo completoMilosavljevic, Miroslav, Jelena Milosavljevic e Ognjen Bakmaz. "UGOVORI O TURISTIČKIM USLUGAMA SA POSEBNIM POGLEDOM NA UGOVOR O ANGAŽOVANjU TURISTIČKIH KAPACITETA". In XV Majsko savetovanje: Sloboda pružanja usluga i pravna sigurnost. University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Law, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/xvmajsko.343m.
Testo completoSalomo, S. "Comparative Study on Fixed-Price Contract Versus Incentive-Based Contract in Indonesia’s Oil and Gas Industry". In Indonesian Petroleum Association - 46th Annual Convention & Exhibition 2022. Indonesian Petroleum Association, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.29118/ipa22-se-194.
Testo completoŽupan, Mirela. "FEASIBILITY OF MOOCS FOR LEGAL EDUCATION". In International Scientific Conference on International, EU and Comparative Law Issues “Law in the Age of Modern Technologies”. Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.25234/eclic/28270.
Testo completoButorac Malnar, Vlatka, Mihaela Braut Filipović e Antonija Zubović. "RETHINKING UNFAIR TRADING PRACTICES IN AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SUPPLY CHAIN: THE CROATIAN PERSPECTIVE". In International Jean Monnet Module Conference of EU and Comparative Competition Law Issues "Competition Law (in Pandemic Times): Challenges and Reforms. Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.25234/eclic/18812.
Testo completoLjubojev, Nadežda, e Marijana Dukić Mijatović. "LEGAL STATUS OF LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY - COMPARATIVE OVERVIEW". In International scientific conference challenges and open issues of service law. Vol. 2. University of Kragujevac, Faculty of law, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/xxmajsko2.565l.
Testo completoGlušac, Danijela. "SPECIFIČNOSTI ODREĐIVANjA KORISNIKA KOD UGOVORA O OSIGURANjU ŽIVOTA U KORIST TREĆEG LICA". In 14 Majsko savetovanje. University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Law, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/xivmajsko.301g.
Testo completoRapporti di organizzazioni sul tema "Comparative law of contracts"
Kahima, Samuel, Solomon Rukundo e Victor Phillip Makmot. Tax Certainty? The Private Rulings Regime in Uganda in Comparative Perspective. Institute of Development Studies, gennaio 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/ictd.2021.001.
Testo completoMacLeod, W. Bentley. Great Expectations: Law, Employment Contracts, and Labor Market Performance. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, giugno 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w16048.
Testo completoQian, Jun, e Philip Strahan. How Law and Institutions Shape Financial Contracts: The Case of Bank Loans. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, gennaio 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w11052.
Testo completoDussan, Manuel, e Alejandro Melandri. Estudio comparativo de las condiciones esenciales de la provisión de servicios públicos domiciliarios en América Latina. Inter-American Development Bank, settembre 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0009972.
Testo completoRoberts, Tony, Abrar Mohamed Ali, Mohamed Farahat, Ridwan Oloyede e Grace Mutung'u. Surveillance Law in Africa: a Review of Six Countries. Institute of Development Studies, ottobre 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/ids.2021.059.
Testo completoElbehri, Aziz, e Thomas Hertel. A Comparative Analysis of the EU-Morocco FTA vs. Multilateral Liberalization. GTAP Working Paper, dicembre 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.21642/gtap.wp30.
Testo completoBrown, Thomas C., e George L. Peterson. An enquiry into the method of paired comparison: reliability, scaling, and Thurstone's Law of Comparative Judgment. Ft. Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.2737/rmrs-gtr-216.
Testo completoBrown, Thomas C., e George L. Peterson. An enquiry into the method of paired comparison: reliability, scaling, and Thurstone's Law of Comparative Judgment. Ft. Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.2737/rmrs-gtr-216.
Testo completoMoriguchi, Chiaki. Implicit Contracts, the Great Depression, and Institutional Change: A Comparative Analysis of U.S. and Japanese Employment Relations, 1920-1940. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, marzo 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w9559.
Testo completoKim, Hyeyoung, Jihyun Lee e Gerardo Reyes-Tagle. Standardized PPP Contract in Korea and its Implications for Latin America and the Caribbean. Inter-American Development Bank, novembre 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0003708.
Testo completo