Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « Voting – Netherlands »
Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres
Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « Voting – Netherlands ».
À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.
Articles de revues sur le sujet "Voting – Netherlands"
MIDDENDORP, C. P., et P. R. KOLKHUIS TANKE. « Economic voting in the Netherlands ». European Journal of Political Research 18, no 5 (septembre 1990) : 535–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1990.tb00247.x.
Texte intégralde Jong, Abe, Gerard Mertens et Peter Roosenboom. « Shareholders’ Voting at General Meetings : Evidence from the Netherlands ». Journal of Management & ; Governance 10, no 4 (novembre 2006) : 353–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10997-006-9006-1.
Texte intégralLemmink, Jacques. « ‘Op proef doeltreffend gebleken, kunnen we spreken van een bereikt ideaal’ ». De Moderne Tijd 5, no 1 (1 janvier 2021) : 35–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.5117/dmt2021.1.002.lemm.
Texte intégralvan Manen, Mirjam J. G., Michael Kreuter, Bernt van den Blink, Ute Oltmanns, Karin Palmowski, Eva Brunnemer, Simone Hummler et al. « What patients with pulmonary fibrosis and their partners think : a live, educative survey in the Netherlands and Germany ». ERJ Open Research 3, no 1 (janvier 2017) : 00065–2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00065-2016.
Texte intégralDorussen, Han, et Michaell Taylor. « The political context of issue-priority voting : coalitions and economic voting in the Netherlands, 1970–1999 ». Electoral Studies 20, no 3 (septembre 2001) : 399–426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0261-3794(00)00026-3.
Texte intégralOostveen, Anne-Marie. « Outsourcing Democracy : Losing Control of e-Voting in the Netherlands ». Policy & ; Internet 2, no 4 (22 janvier 2010) : 196–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.2202/1944-2866.1065.
Texte intégralvan der Waal, Jeroen, et Willem de Koster. « Populism and Support for Protectionism : The Relevance of Opposition to Trade Openness for Leftist and Rightist Populist Voting in The Netherlands ». Political Studies 66, no 3 (10 novembre 2017) : 560–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0032321717723505.
Texte intégralLouwerse, Tom, Simon Otjes, David M. Willumsen et Patrik Öhberg. « Reaching across the aisle ». Party Politics 23, no 6 (12 janvier 2016) : 746–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354068815626000.
Texte intégralJansen, Giedo, Nan Dirk De Graaf et Ariana Need. « Class voting, social changes and political changes in the Netherlands 1971–2006 ». Electoral Studies 30, no 3 (septembre 2011) : 510–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2011.02.005.
Texte intégralMyeoun-Hoei Kim. « Current Status and future prospect of E-voting : Germany and the Netherlands ». Journal of Contemporary European Studies 25, no 2 (août 2007) : 39–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.17052/jces.2007.25.2.39.
Texte intégralThèses sur le sujet "Voting – Netherlands"
Pauwels, Teun. « The populist voter : explaining electoral support for populist parties in The Netherlands, Belgium and Germany ». Doctoral thesis, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/2013/ULB-DIPOT:oai:dipot.ulb.ac.be:2013/209745.
Texte intégralThe study begins with a careful investigation of all parties in Belgium, The Netherlands and Germany by means of both qualitative and quantitative methods to explore which of them could be labelled populist. Support was found for at least the following cases: LPF, the Belgian Lijst Dedecker (LDD), the Dutch Partij Voor de Vrijheid (PVV), VB, the Dutch Socialistische Partij (SP) and DL. In a next step, the voters of these parties were analyzed by means of election survey data (Dutch Parliamentary Election Study, Partirep Survey and German Longitudinal Election Study).
The main finding of is that dissatisfaction with the functioning of democracy and a desire for more decision making through referendums are important and unique drivers for populist voting in general. On the demand side it is argued that a process of cartelization, i.e. increased reliance of parties on state subventions, more cooperation between government and opposition, and ideological moderation, combined with the growth of critical citizens has led to the questioning of political authority. On the supply side, an increasing group of well-organized populist parties have begun challenging mainstream parties by depicting them as a group of self-serving elites depriving the ordinary people of their sovereignty. Moreover, populist parties claim to restore the voice of the people through the introduction of direct democracy. Accordingly, a growing group of voters who share these concerns are attracted to the populist appeal.
Another important finding of this study is that populist parties generally attract social groups that feel themselves deprived. In Eastern Germany of the 1990s these were the ‘losers of unification’, i.e. highly educated civil servants who had lost the social prestige that they enjoyed during the heydays of the DDR. Yet in contemporary ‘diploma democracies’ it appears that populist parties, regardless of their host ideology, are increasingly attracting the ‘losers of globalization’, which are the lower educated and lower social classes. While populism has mostly been considered a threat for democracy, the ability of populist parties to integrate excluded social groups into the political system certainly deserves notice.
Doctorat en Sciences politiques et sociales
info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished
Karlsson, Anton. « The Left-Right Scale : An analysis of its connection to preferences on economic issues ». Thesis, Linköpings universitet, Statsvetenskap, 2020. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-165611.
Texte intégralUlrici, Mark. « Bioenergy adoption barriers across 7 EU countries : A comparison of Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, and the United Kingdom ». Thesis, KTH, Hållbar utveckling, miljövetenskap och teknik, 2019. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-254803.
Texte intégralEuropa försöker göra en omställning från fossila bränslen till förnybar energi. Bioenergi är väl positionerat för att spela en viktig roll i detta. Bioenergi är en mindre intermittent energikälla än vind och solenergi och kan därmed komplettera dessa. Bioenergi som andel av den totala energianvändningen skiljer sig emellertid väsentligt mellan europeiska länder. Vad som orsakar dessa skillnader och vilka hinder som finns för implementering av bioenergi undersöks i denna rapport för sju EU-länder: Belgien, Danmark, Frankrike, Tyskland, Nederländerna, Sverige och Storbritannien. Hindren på systemnivå för implementering av bioenergi kategoriseras i de fem kategorierna, infrastruktur, marknadsproblem, interaktioner, institutioner och kapacitet. En litteraturöversikt ger den första insikten om hinder, som sedan följs av en utläggning gällande den nuvarande lagstiftningen i de sju länderna. Efter det intervjuas branschspecialister från fem av de sju länderna. Slutligen analyseras röstbeteende i Europaparlamentet och oljeindustrins inflytande. Resultaten visar att oljebranschen inte verkar påverka politikernas beteende i betydande utsträckning beträffande bioenergi. Politiker från länder med stor oljeindustri röstade inte mer negativt gällande bioenergidirektiv i EU-parlamentet än de från länder utan stor oljebransch. Däremot kan den allmänna opinionen mot bioenergi få stora effekter på genomförandet, vilket observerades i Nederländerna. Ingen slutsats kan dras gällande varför utbredningen av bioenergi skiljer sig åt mellan de sju länderna. I varje land fanns det en rad olika hinder i vägen för implementering av bioenergi. Sverige och Danmark har inga systemproblem för implementering av bioenergi. Om den allmänna opinionen är negativt inställd till bioenergi kan det börja spela en större roll för utbredningen av bioenergi i västeuropeiska länder, som Nederländerna och Tyskland.
STRÖBELE, Maarit Felicitas. « What does suburbia vote for ? : changed settlement patterns and political preference in three European countries ». Doctoral thesis, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/28055.
Texte intégralExamining Board: Professor Alexander H. Trechsel, EUI (Supervisor); Professor Martin Kohli, EUI; Professor R. Alan Walks, University of Toronto; Professor Richard Rose FBA, University of Stratchclyde.
PDF of thesis uploaded from the Library digital archive of EUI PhD theses
Is there such a thing as suburban political preference in Western Europe, and if so, how is this related to political cleavages associated with geographically bound interests? What is the role of the classic urban-rural cleavage today? To answer these questions, the dissertation combines approaches from urban geography and political science to explain how the political preferences between core city and suburban voters differ in a cross-national comparative perspective. Suburbanisation has radically changed the European landscape in the 20th century: A significant share of the population now lives in places that could be defined as suburbs instead of inner cities, small towns and villages, or the countryside. However, when it comes to questions concerning the built environment and the political sphere, a large part of political research only distinguishes between urban and rural, even though metropolitan regions now include a multitude of different places with their own characteristics and associated political beliefs and interests. Urban-suburban divergences in political preference are examined considering the close relationship between the built environment and patterns of daily life. The dissertation incorporates the idea of the social construction of spaces into an explanation of suburban electoral preferences. The study demonstrates that urban-suburban divergences are substantially based on diverging patterns of daily use of spaces, as well as to different lifestyles within the middle class. Two key aspects are relevant: the family pattern and the use of public services. First, family patterns are clearly related to the building density of the place of residence. It is postulated that in less densely constructed and populated municipalities, the organisation of daily life is easier in a breadwinner-housekeeper pattern, which is in turn linked to conservative political preferences. Second, urban inhabitants tend to rely more on public services than suburbanites, while right-wing conservative parties tend to favour the limitation of public services. The hypotheses are examined in three country case studies (Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland) that begin with an overview of the national histories of suburbanisation, showing how suburbanisation and metropolitanisation are related to political discourses and policy-making. In a second step, statistical analyses take into account different aspects of suburban and urban inhabitants' daily life routine related to the use public services as well as to the family pattern. The findings of the statistical analyses are interpreted in relation to the history of suburbanisation and evidence that political preferences are indeed related to daily life and the place of residence. The analyses mostly result in a suburban tendency towards the conservative side of the political spectrum as compared to inner city inhabitants, and show that suburban political preference patterns are closer to rural than to core city patterns. In a further context, the study aims to broaden the understanding of political cleavages in European democracies, particularly the urban-rural cleavage, highlighting the relationship between one of the largest changes in the European landscape over the 20th century and the inhabitants' political preferences.
Livres sur le sujet "Voting – Netherlands"
Need, Ariana. The kindred vote : Individual and family effects of social class and religion on electoral change in the Netherlands, 1956-1994. [Groningen] : Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology, 1997.
Trouver le texte intégralMochmann, Ekkehard. Inventory of national election studies in Europe, 1945-1995 : Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden. Bergisch Gladbach : E. Ferger, 1998.
Trouver le texte intégralVoter behavior in economics [i.e. economic] perspective. Berlin : Springer-Verlag, 1991.
Trouver le texte intégralInfluencing mass political behavior : Elites and political subcultures in the Netherlands and Austria. [Berkeley] : Institute of International Studies, University of California, Berkeley, 1985.
Trouver le texte intégralTambouris, Efthimios. Electronic Participation : Third IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, ePart 2011, Delft, The Netherlands, August 29 – September 1, 2011. Proceedings. Berlin, Heidelberg : IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, 2011.
Trouver le texte intégralLodewijk, Blok. Stemmen en kiezen : Het kiesstelsel in Nederland in de periode 1814-1850 = On indirect voting : the electoral system in the Netherlands, 1814-1850. Groningen : Wolters-Noordhoff/Forsten, 1987.
Trouver le texte intégralDennis, Faber, et Vermunt Niels. 12 National Report for the Netherlands. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198727293.003.0012.
Texte intégralPopulism in Western Europe : Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands. Taylor & Francis Group, 2014.
Trouver le texte intégralPauwels, Teun. Populism in Western Europe : Comparing Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands. Taylor & Francis Group, 2017.
Trouver le texte intégralRoads to the Radical Right : Understanding Different Forms of Electoral Support for Radical Right-Wing Parties in France and the Netherlands. Oxford University Press, 2020.
Trouver le texte intégralChapitres de livres sur le sujet "Voting – Netherlands"
Loeber, Leontine. « The E-voting Readiness Index and the Netherlands ». Dans Electronic Voting, 146–59. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00419-4_10.
Texte intégralvan der Kolk, Henk. « The Netherlands ». Dans The Routledge Handbook of Local Elections and Voting in Europe, 161–73. London : Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003009672-18.
Texte intégralde Vreese, Claes, Rachid Azrout et Judith Moeller. « Netherlands 2014 EP Voting Patterns : From Euphile to Eurosceptic ». Dans The Eurosceptic 2014 European Parliament Elections, 149–69. London : Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58696-4_8.
Texte intégralJacobs, Bart, et Wolter Pieters. « Electronic Voting in the Netherlands : From Early Adoption to Early Abolishment ». Dans Foundations of Security Analysis and Design V, 121–44. Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03829-7_4.
Texte intégralKleinnijenhuis, Jan, et Jan A. De Ridder. « Effects of Issue Priorities in the News on Voting Preferences ; The 1994 Election Campaign in the Netherlands ». Dans Public Priority Setting : Rules and Costs, 275–305. Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1487-2_15.
Texte intégralLafarre, Anne. « Shareholder Voting and Engagement in the Netherlands : The Dutch Institutional Approach ». Dans The Cambridge Handbook of Shareholder Engagement and Voting, 403–26. Cambridge University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108914383.020.
Texte intégral« The bells toll no more : the declining influence of religion on voting behaviour in the Netherlands ». Dans Religion and Mass Electoral Behaviour in Europe, 97–118. Routledge, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203991831-14.
Texte intégral