Pour voir les autres types de publications sur ce sujet consultez le lien suivant : Vindicatio.
Articles de revues sur le sujet « Vindicatio »
Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres
Consultez les 50 meilleurs articles de revues pour votre recherche sur le sujet « Vindicatio ».
À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.
Parcourez les articles de revues sur diverses disciplines et organisez correctement votre bibliographie.
1
Du Plessis, Elmien WJ. « Can Estoppel be Raised Against an Eviction in Terms of PIE ? » Southern African Public Law 30, no 2 (1 décembre 2017) : 434–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.25159/2522-6800/3588.
Texte intégralRésumé :
Estoppel is a well-known defence against (or limitation on) the rei vindicatio. This would be the case for example where the owner by some representation creates the impression that a third party is the owner of a thing and that the third party has the capacity to alienate the property. The bona fide third party can, when the owner then institutes the rei vindication to recover his property, raise estoppel and preclude the real owner from claiming his property. Before 2002, if one wanted to evict an unlawful occupier from certain residential premises, one would institute the rei vindicatio. In Ndlovu v Ngcobo; Bekker v Jika [2002] 4 All SA 384 (SCA) the court, however, ruled that the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act 19 of 1998 (PIE) must be used in all instances of evicting people from urban residential premises. The question is: does estoppel serve as a defence/limit in the application of PIE? Surprisingly few cases deal with this issue. The court in Joe Slovo made a few remarks about the possibility of using estoppel as a defence against the rei vindicatio by looking at the interpretation of ‘tacit consent’ required by PIE. This article will interpret provisions of PIE and look at case law that deals with the use of estoppel in lease cases. It will conclude by remarking on the feasibility of using estoppel as a defence in PIE eviction cases.
2
Romanska, Iryna. « On the question of the ratio between the condictio and the vindicatio ». Law Review of Kyiv University of Law, no 2 (10 août 2020) : 281–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.36695/2219-5521.2.2020.53.
Texte intégralRésumé :
The scientific article is devoted to the solution of the scientific-applied problem of delimitation of the obtaining, keeping of pro -perty without sufficient legal basis with the vindicatio.The criteria for the ratio of a reclaim owner’s property from someone else’s illegal possession and a condictio claim are consi -dered. Both common and distinctive features of these legal institutions are analyzed. Vindicatio and condictio lawsuits are effectiveways to protect property rights, not measures of liability.Obligations arising from the obtaining, keeping of property without sufficient legal basis, as well as reclaim owners property fromsomeone else’s illegal possession, by their legal nature belong to the number of renewable, protective and non-contractual legal relations.The similarity can be seen in the so-called criteria as «right to follow». It is concluded that the range of persons entitled to file acondictio claim is wider than the subjects entitled to vindicatio.The main difference between condictio and vindicatio is that a claim for the return of property from someone else owns withoutsufficient legal basis is a legal remedy, and a claim for recovery of property from someone else’s illegal possession is a legal claim. Itis established that in contrast to vindicatio, the fact that the illegal purchaser actually owns the thing, in the case of condictio is not decisive.It is justified that in comparison with the vindicatio the condictio obligation has a wider range of action and is applied regardlessof the good faith of the purchaser and regardless of how the property was taken out of the possession of the creditor.Based on the generalization of theoretical research, analysis of current legislation of Ukraine, it is established that the obligationof condictio is a universal independent way to protect subjective civil law and an effective means of influencing the illegal acquirer.Condictio is applied in the alternative to vindicatio, when a certain requirement of the titular owner of the property is not covered bythe regulations of the main method of protection. The author concludes that it is impossible to compete in vindicatio and condictioclaims.
3
Niewiadomski, Krzysztof. « Personalistyczne ujęcie cnoty vindicatio jako sprawności służącej międzyosobowemu pojednaniu ». Teologia i Moralność 10, no 2(18) (5 décembre 2015) : 167–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/tim.2015.18.2.11.
Texte intégralRésumé :
Cnota "vindicatio" była znana już w starozytności. Znaleziono także opis dokonany przez św. Tomasza według którego vindicatio miał ważną rolę w wymierzenia kary, tak by mogła ona służyć nawróceniu grzesznika i przywróceniu sprawiedliwości. W artykule opisano jego dodatkowy aspekt tej cnoty, który może być zdefiniowany jako personalistyczny - jest bardzo dobrze zobrazowany w biblijnej historii Józefa z Egiptu. Składa się z pewnych aktów, przyczyniając się ostatecznie do budowania pełnego pojednania międzyludzkiej. Położenie większego nacisku na ten aspekt może doprowadzić do lepszego zrozumienia procesu pojednania i jej praktycznych wymagań.
4
Ваштарева, Євгенія Анатоліївна. « Condictio and Vindicatio in Roman Law ». Problems of Legality, no 139 (8 décembre 2017) : 95–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.139.115112.
Texte intégral
5
Watt, J. « Vindicatio. A Defence of the Experimental Method ». Postgraduate Medical Journal 61, no 712 (1 février 1985) : 187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.61.712.187-a.
Texte intégral
6
Niewiadomski, Krzysztof. « Cnoty pokrewne sprawiedliwości w świetle etyki personalistycznej ». Teologia i Moralność 16, no 2(30) (20 décembre 2021) : 187–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/tim.2021.30.2.10.
Texte intégralRésumé :
Cnoty pokrewne sprawiedliwości analizowane w optyce personalistycznej wskazują na pewne cechy i uprawnienia osoby ludzkiej, przysługujących jej ze względu na wrodzoną godność. Te cnoty to pietas, cześć, szacunek, posłuszeństwo, wdzięczność, przyjaźń, hojność, prawdomówność, vindicatio i epikeia. Osoba ludzka jawi się jako godna ich aktów, będąc jedynym na ziemi stworzeniem, którego Bóg chciał dla niego samego.
7
Medić, Duško. « Protection of Property Rights in the Law of Republika Srpska / Zaštita prava svojine u pravu Republike Srpske ». Годишњак факултета правних наука - АПЕИРОН 4, no 4 (30 juillet 2014) : 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.7251/gfp1404017m.
Texte intégralRésumé :
Property right as the most extensive legally recognized ownership on things has also wide-ranging legal protection. The author deals with the issue of the protection of the property rights in accordance with the Republika Srpska Law of Proprietary Rights. This Law distinguishes property claim for return on things (rei vindicatio), hypothetical property claim, (actio Publiciana) and claim for intrusion or disturbance (actio negatoria). The aforementioned claims also existed in the Roman legislation. Principles regarding protection of the property rights, mostly apply to the protection of rights of co-owners and joint proprietors.
8
Mezzanotte, Francesco. « The Protection of Ownership of Goods in the DCFR : An Exclusion Strategy at the Core of European Property Law ? » European Review of Private Law 21, Issue 4 (1 août 2013) : 1009–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/erpl2013056.
Texte intégralRésumé :
Abstract: Book VIII of the Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR), formally dedicated to the 'Acquisition and Loss of Ownership of Goods', also sets out model rules for protection of ownership of goods, providing owners of movables with the right to prevent others from taking them away (rei vindicatio) or from exercising any interference with their proprietary interests (actio negatoria). While consistent with the continental roots of property law, this model of defence is, to a certain extent, unknown in the evolved tradition of personal property in common law. This article analyses the potential impact of the rules proposed by the drafters in the light of the overriding interests found at the core of the principles of European private law, aiming in particular to evaluate the impact that their underlying rationales may have on the development of a harmonized system of European property. Résumé: Le livre VIII du Projet de Cadre commun de référence (DCFR), officiellement consacré à l«Acquisition et perte de la propriété des biens», énonce également des modèles de règles ayant pour objet la protection de la propriété des biens meubles, qui confèrent aux propriétaires le droit d'empêcher les tiers de s'en approprier (rei vindicatio) ou d'interférer avec leurs prérogatives (actio negatoria). Quoique compatible avec les racines continentales du droit de la propriété, ce modèle de protection est, dans une certaine mesure, inconnu dans la tradition de la personal property propre à la common law. L'article évalue l'impact potentiel des règles proposées par les rédacteurs à la lumière des intérêts portés par les principes du droit privé européen, en essayant en particulier de comprendre l'impact que les logiques sous-jacentes à ces règles peuvent avoir dans le processus d'harmonisation européenne de la propriété.
9
Schroeter, Laura, et Francois Schroeder. « Is Gibbard a Realist ? » Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 1, no 2 (1 juin 2017) : 1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v1i2.9.
Texte intégral
10
Kledyńska, Anna. « Scope of Claims Supplementary to Rei Vindicatio in the Polish and German Law : Analysis and Comparative Remarks ». Kwartalnik Prawa Międzynarodowego II, no II (30 septembre 2022) : 149–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.9981.
Texte intégralRésumé :
The purpose of this article is to present the regulations on supplementary claims applicable under the Polish and German law. The concept of supplementary claims under the Polish law refers to claims regulated in Articles 224 to 225 of the Polish Civil Code. Under German law, the core of the regulations governing the types and scope of these claims is contained in the text of §§ 987 to 993 of the BGB. On the grounds of both the analysed legal orders, one can notice numerous similarities regarding the way these claims are shaped. The most fundamental is the desire to provide increased protection for the good faith possessor and to tighten the liability of the person in possession of the thing, who is already aware of a vindicatory action against them or is in bad faith. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the analysis of the solutions for supplementary claims also allows us to see significant differences, expressed primarily in the much more comprehensive regulation of the issue in question in the German law. The article offers a comparative legal analysis of the solutions functioning on the grounds of both these legal orders and conclusions.
11
Weinstein, D. « Vindicating Utilitarianism ». Utilitas 14, no 1 (mars 2002) : 71–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s095382080000340x.
Texte intégralRésumé :
This essay examines D. G. Ritchie's claim that ‘in Ethics the theory of natural selection has vindicated all that has proved most permanently valuable in Utilitarianism.’ Principally, it endeavours to determine what Ritchie means by ‘Vindicated’ and what kind of utilitarianism he thinks evolutionary theory vindicates. With respect to the kind of utilitarianism vindicated, I will show how he tries to fortify Millian liberal utilitarianism with new liberal values such as self-realization and common good. Ritchie's intellectual debts were eclectic and included mostly Mill, T. H. Green, Hegel and Herbert Spencer.
12
Sonnekus, J. C. « Jhering se knuppel onder die hoenders - sessie van die rei vindicatio anderhalf eeu later ». Groninger Opmerkingen en Mededelingen 35 (1 janvier 2018) : 175–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.21827/grom.35.35654.
Texte intégral
13
Nótári, Tamás. « Adalékok a legis actio sacramento in rem eredetéhez ». Antik Tanulmányok 51, no 1 (1 juin 2007) : 71–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/anttan.51.2007.1.5.
Texte intégralRésumé :
A legis actio sacramento in rem mindmáig a római jog szakirodalmának legvitatottabb kérdései közé tartozik, irodalma mára könyvtárnyivá duzzadt, annak hozzávetőleges feldolgozása is önálló tanulmány tárgyát képezhetné. A legis actio sacramento in rem eredetének magyarázata kapcsán több, egymástól többé-kevésbé világosan elkülönülő irányzatot különböztethetünk meg, vizsgálódásunk szempontjából a legfontosabbnak az esküelméletet és a magánharcról szóló teóriát tekinthetjük. A legis actio sacramento eredendően szakrális jellegét hangsúlyozza az esküteória, amely szerint a pervesztes fél hamis esküjét, sacramentumát megtorló istenség expiatiója lehetett a közösségi kontroll fő célja, ezt az elméletet a vindicatio erősen formalizált, vallási-mágikus carmenként megjelenő szövege is alátámasztja. Jheringre vezetik vissza - noha jóval korábbi - a magánharcelméletet, amelynek az a lényege, hogy a felek kezdetben tényleges harcot folytattak a köztük vita tárgyát képező dologért, ám a közösség (az állam) a belső békét megőrizendő e harcot saját ellenőrzése alá vonta, s ezért e harcra a legis actio sacramento in rem általunk ismert formájában már csak szimbolikusan, a lándzsa (hasta) helyett használt pálca (festuca) jelzésszerű alkalmazásával került sor. Célunk csupán annyi, hogy egy - főként a forrásokra, részben a szakirodalom eddigi eredményeire alapozott - lehetőséget villantsunk fel, amely a legis actio sacramento in rem struktúrájában a szakralitás és a magánharc motívumait nem egymásnak ellentmondó, hanem szerves kiegészítő komponensként elegyíti.
14
Smith, Michael. « Immodest Consequentialism and Character ». Utilitas 13, no 2 (juillet 2001) : 173–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0953820800003125.
Texte intégralRésumé :
The fact that we place the value that we do on the traits of character constitutive of being a good friend, and the acts that good friends are disposed to perform, creates a considerable problem for what I call ‘immodest global consequentialism’. The problem is, in essence, that the very best that the immodest global consequentialists can do by way of vindicating our most deeply held convictions about the value of these traits of character and actions isn't good enough, because, while vindicating our possession of those convictions, the attempted vindication undermines the truth of the convictions thus possessed. This is especially bad news because, as I argue, immodest global consequentialism is the only version of consequentialism that can be distinguished in any principled way from a form of non-consequentialism.
15
Mulligan, Andrea. « A vindicatory approach to tortious liability for mistakes in assisted human reproduction ». Legal Studies 40, no 1 (14 octobre 2019) : 55–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/lst.2019.19.
Texte intégralRésumé :
AbstractMistakes in assisted human reproduction procedures such as IVF, egg, sperm and embryo donation are surprisingly common, but tortious liability for such mistakes has not been addressed in the courts of England and Wales, or Ireland. This paper presents an argument in favour of a vindicatory approach to tortious claims arising from mistakes, where the claimants are the parents of the resulting, healthy, child. Drawing on the analogous tort of wrongful pregnancy, the paper provides a vindicatory account of the case of Rees v Darlington Memorial Hospital, and argues that Rees signposts the correct approach for tortious claims arising from mistakes in assisted human reproduction. It is argued that while the law should not compensate ‘loss’ flowing from the birth of a child, parents should be entitled to an award of damages to vindicate their right to reproductive autonomy. The paper explores vindication of the right to reproductive autonomy through the tort of negligence, but argues that vindication may be more effectively achieved through the creation of a separate tort which is actionable per se, strict liability, and expressly focused on vindication rather than compensation.
16
Henry, John. « Kenneth Dewhurst (editor), Richard Lower's Vindicatio : A defence of the experimental method, Oxford, Sandford Publications, 1983, pp. xxxiv, 313, [including facsimile], £25.00. » Medical History 29, no 1 (janvier 1985) : 100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0025727300043799.
Texte intégral
17
Scott, H. « Interference without ownership : The theft of incorporeal money in the South African law of unjustified enrichment ». Acta Juridica 2021 (2021) : 343–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.47348/acta/2021/a13.
Texte intégralRésumé :
First National Bank of Southern Africa v Perry, Nissan South Africa v Marnitz NO and Absa Bank v Lombard Insurance, as well as Trustees, Estate Whitehead v Dumas and Absa Bank v Moore, together amount to a concerted attempt on the part of South African courts to provide victims of the theft of incorporeal money with adequate redress. However, it has proved difficult to find a satisfactory juristic explanation for this series of decisions. This chapter shows that a model organised around the extension of the vindicatio to incorporeal money is unworkable. Instead, having considered briefly a second possibility, namely, the English constructive trust, this chapter advances an analysis of the plaintiff’s claim to the stolen money solely in terms of the non-consensual enrichment (that is, enrichment other than by deliberate conferral) of the defendant at their expense. Apart from its superior explanatory power, such an approach offers a blueprint for future development, insofar as it opens the way to the recognition of a secured claim where the proceeds of stolen money have been used to discharge the thief ’s pre-existing secured debts: the doctrine of subrogation to extinguished rights. This chapter closes by considering the implications of these conclusions for wider debates about the proper size and shape of the law of unjust enrichment.
18
Lorents, D. V. « Compensation to the Bona Fide Homeowner for the Loss of Residential Premises2 ». Actual Problems of Russian Law 15, no 7 (7 août 2020) : 49–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.116.7.049-059.
Texte intégralRésumé :
New rules for compensation to the bona fide houseowner (physical entity) for the loss of residential premises were adopted were adopted on 1 January 2020. Such compensation is not tortious in nature. It is comparable to the real damage or cadastral value of a vindicated apartment. The amount of compensation is now not limited to 1 million rubles, and the period of impossibility of enforcement proceedings against perpetrators has been reduced to 6 months. At the same time, the date of entry into legal force of the court decision concerning the residential premises vindication and the date of the claim of a bona fide citizen for compensation in relation to 1 January 2020 affect the conditions of compensation, the amount of payment, the status of the respondent and the amount of budgetary funds. Taking into account the standing of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in A. N. Dubovets case, it would be fair to assign risks of imperfection of the Unified State Register of Immovable Property (EGRN) to a public legal establishment and provide individuals with absolute protection from public vindication or, at least, envisage the possibility of compensation immediately after vindication without additional court proceedings. However, from the point of view of the economic efficiency of law, the law-maker expressed a preference for a legal model of protection of the original owner in order to discourage commission of offenses in the field of civil turnover of real property. The development of a fair system of compensatory measures for property vindication becomes a general trend in the legal mechanism of protection of civil rights in Russia.
19
Daoust, Marc-Kevin. « Consistency, Obligations, and Accuracy-Dominance Vindications ». Dialectica 74, no 1 (18 novembre 2022) : 139–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.48106/dial.v74.i1.07.
Texte intégralRésumé :
Vindicating the claim that agents ought to be consistent has proved to be a difficult task. Recently, some have argued that we can use accuracy-dominance arguments to vindicate the normativity of such requirements. But what do these arguments prove, exactly? In this paper, I argue that we can make a distinction between two theses on the normativity of consistency: the view that one ought to be consistent and the view that one ought to avoid being inconsistent. I argue that accuracy-dominance arguments for consistency support the latter view, but not necessarily the former. I also argue that the distinction between these two theses matters in the debate on the normativity of epistemic rationality. Specifically, the distinction suggests that there are interesting alternatives to vindicating the strong claim that one ought to be consistent.
20
Podshivalov, Tikhon. « Models of Actio Negatoria in the Law of Russia and European Countries ». Russian Law Journal 7, no 2 (30 mai 2019) : 128–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2019-7-2-128-164.
Texte intégralRésumé :
Actio negatoria is necessary in a situation wherein no one questions the ownership of an object by the owner, and the object remains in his possession, but someone exploits it without sufficient legal basis, treats it just as if he was endowed with the opportunity and the right to use someone else’s object. Despite the apparent simplicity of actio negatoria in the legislation of European countries, three models of this lawsuit have been developed, built according to the actio negatoria design that existed at different stages of the development of Roman private law – the common law model, the Roman model, and the German model. This study is based on the method of analysis of judicial practice and the method of comparative law. Based on the results of this study, we conclude that actio negatoria is not a universal method of protection. It is necessary to deviate from the principle of residual attention of the legislator to actio negatoria, residual, first of all, compared to rei vindicatio. Based on the analysis of the three models of actio negatoria that exist in the law of European countries, a new, fourth model of this lawsuit is proposed. Only an immovable object can be the subject of an actio negatoria dispute. Actio negatoria cannot be used to challenge the registered right to immovable objects. Actio negatoria can be used to protect the subjective right of property from a violation of ownership which is produced by interfering with possession and which does not result in dispossession.
21
Henley, Kenneth. « Hume’s “Wilt Chamberlain Argument” and taxation ». Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42, S1 (février 2012) : 148–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2012.972143.
Texte intégralRésumé :
Robert Nozick addresses the idea of egalitarian redistribution in an argument standardly considered original: the “Wilt Chamberlain Argument”. However, this argument (without reference to Wilt Chamberlain) is found in David Hume's An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, first published in 1751. Placing this argument within a Humean and Hayekian, rather than a Lockean or Kantian, perspective radically changes its import for issues of economic justice. Rather than vindicating the radical individualism of Nozick and other libertarians, applied to our circumstances using Hume's conventionalist and evolutionary account of justice, Hume's Wilt Chamberlain argument vindicates moderate redistribution constrained by the rule of general laws and the goal of fostering innovation and industriousness.
22
Ruszkiewicz, Beata. « ‘LONGI TEMPORIS PRAESCRIPTIO’ JAKO ZARZUT DŁUGIEGO OKRESU POSIADANIA ». Zeszyty Prawnicze 11, no 1 (21 décembre 2016) : 245. http://dx.doi.org/10.21697/zp.2011.11.1.13.
Texte intégralRésumé :
‘LONGI TEMPORIS PRAESCRIPTIO’ AS A DEMURRER IN THE MATTER OF LONG POSSESSIONSummary During centuries Praescriptio longi temporis has changed its meaning, requirements, application and nature, therefore, it seems to be adequate, to use it as a subject of the conference entitled “Law at the turn of the century”. This term derives from the Greek law. During the Pre-Classical Age it had its specific nature of an usual procedural privilege, granted on the basis of a long lack of action taken from the opposite party. Since the 1st century AD it had been used in Roman provinces and between peregrines. In Justinian’s era, after the combination with usucapio, it gained the acquiring nature. Praescriptio longi temporis, as a system operating according to the Greek conception, was, on the one hand, aimed at the ending of the insecurity of the relations resulting from the long-term provincial property possession, while on the other, it couldn’t lead to acquire their ownership due to the fact that they belonged to the Roman State. As the extinguishing limitation, it resembled the roman exceptio, after the defendant, and rei vindicatio, after the owner. It was set against the owner who revindicates, who would have left the provincial land unsecured for the period of 20 years, if the case had concerned subjects inhabiting different provinces (inter absentes) and for the period of 10 years, if the sides had inhabited the same province (inter praesentes). At the turn of the 3rd and 4th century AD it gained the acquiring effectiveness that convinced Justinian to conduct a fundamental reform by which virtue, from the combination of usucapio and longi temporis praescriptio, ordinary acquisitive prescription originated and extraordinary acquisitive prescription was introduced – longissimi temporis praescriptio.
23
Sánchez Martínez, César Félix. « Con más nobleza que la que ha tenido el orbe entero : La vindicatio indianorum de Ventura Travada (c. 1752) y el tópico del «racismo colonial» en el Perú ». Allpanchis 43, no 77/78 (19 janvier 2011) : 249–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.36901/allpanchis.v43i77/78.284.
Texte intégralRésumé :
Reducir la complejidad de la subjetividad andina del periodo virreinal a las muchas veces anacrónicas categorías de constructos ideológicos modernos puede ser una tentación constante en los ámbitos académicos y mediáticos de reflexión sobre el Perú. En este artículo indagaremos sobre esta complejidad y sobre la validez y consistencia del tópico del supuesto «racismo colonial» de la mano, preferentemente, de un letrado virreinal de provincias, el padre Buenaventura Fernández de Córdoba y Peredo (1695-1758), párroco de pueblos de indios en la diócesis de Arequipa, más conocido por su nombre de pluma Ventura Travada, autor de El Suelo de Arequipa convertido en Cielo (c.1752).
24
Cucarella-Ramon, Vicent. « Resilience and Memory in the Poetics of Africadia : Sylvia D. Hamilton's And I Alone Escaped To Tell You ». Grove - Working Papers on English Studies 28 (23 décembre 2021) : 67–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.17561/grove.28.6301.
Texte intégralRésumé :
Sylvia D. Hamilton’s collection of poems And I Alone Escaped To Tell You (2014) revolves around the vindication of the little remembered legacy of slavery of Africadians – George Elliott Clarke’s neologism to refer to African Canadians from the Maritime provinces – which acts as a metaphor of the silenced history of Black Canadians. To do so, Hamilton relies on memory work through the lens of resilience and, hence, participates in the recent post-trauma paradigm that is intent on highlighting resistance rather than victimhood. Thus, the resilient memory that emerges from the collection dismisses the position of victims for Africadians and, contrarily, focuses on the capacity to ‘bounce back’, to withstand historical adversities, to endure by being malleable and to adapt to conditions of crisis. Simply put, this resilient memory acts in the poems as the dignified exercise to keep on reinstating and vindicating the silenced history of Black Canada.
25
Lokshin, I. M. « Democracy against Popular Sovereignty ? (Faces of Power of the People : Theoretic Reconstruction) ». Journal of Political Theory, Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics Politeia 101, no 2 (23 juin 2021) : 6–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.30570/2078-5089-2020-101-2-6-29.
Texte intégralRésumé :
In the article, on the basis of the classical political philosophers, the author distinguishes between three ideal-typical modi of political superiority of the people: “democracy”, “popular sovereignty” and “the natural right of the people to vindicate the supreme power”. Differen ces between them are drawn according to the criteria of (a) the distance between the holder of the supreme power and the holder of power that allows the routine management of the state, and (b) the degree to which the former controls the latter. The theoretic reconstruction of the modi of the political superiority of the people is based on identifying three ways to assert political superiority, expressed in the concepts of κράτος, sovereignty and vindication. This approach makes it possible to trace the specifics of each of the identified modi: “democracy” in its original (ancient Greek) sense is the power of the people, based on the obvious superiority (over the nobility) in their strength, in their excess of power, thanks to which the people are able to effectively implement their will in the public sphere; “popular sovereignty” makes the people a key political agent not by referring to their excess of power, but by securing their legal position as a source of laws and any public power; finally, “the natural right of the people to vindicate the supreme power” asserts the moral and teleological primacy of the people’s good over that of the rulers. According to the author’s conclusion, the three modi of the political superiority of the people differ from each other primarily in the extent to which the people are involved in the political process. Under “democracy” this extent is maximal, in the case of the “natural right to vindication” it is minimal, while “popular sovereignty” finds itself in the middle between these two extremes: both threats of the decisive “alienation” of the people from power and its usurpation by the “trustees” and tyranny of the people are absent. The author thinks that this middle ground of the “popular sovereignty” represents one of the reasons why it is this modus that symbolizes the architectonics of the modern democracy.
26
Deely, John. « Semiotics as a postmodern recovery of the cultural unconscious ». Sign Systems Studies 28 (31 décembre 2000) : 15–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/sss.2000.28.02.
Texte intégralRésumé :
This essay explores the terminology of semiotics with an eye to the historical layers of human experience and understanding that have gone into making the doctrine of signs possible as a contemporary intellectual movement. Using an essentially Heideggerian view of language as a heuristic hypothesis, the name semiotics is examined in light of the realization that only with Augustine's Latin signum was the possibility of a general doctrine of signs introduced, and that first among the later Latins was the idea of sign as a general mode of being specifically verifiable both in nature and in culture in establishing the texture of human experience vindicated according to an explanation of how such a general mode of being is possible. The contemporary resumption through Charles Peirceof the Latin line of vindication completed especially by Poinsot is explored along these same lines in terms of considerations of why the term semiotics has emerged as, so to speak, the logically proper name of the global interest in signs.
27
ARRUDA, CAROLINE T. « Why Moral Status Matters for Metaethics ». Journal of the American Philosophical Association 4, no 4 (2018) : 471–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/apa.2018.15.
Texte intégralRésumé :
AbstractI show that an overlooked feature of our moral life—moral status—provides a route to vindicating naturalist moral realism in much the same way that the Humean theory of motivation and judgment internalism are used to undermine it. Moral status presents two explanatory burdens for metaethical views. First, a given view must provide an ecumenical explanation of moral status, which does not depend on the truth of its metaethical claims (say, that there are mind-independent facts about moral status). Second, its explanation must be consistent with persistent normative ethical disagreement about what constitutes moral status. I conclude that naturalist moral realism succeeds, while quasi-realism fails because it cannot meet the latter requirement. This argument has three results: we have a new route for metaethical vindication more generally and for naturalist moral realism in particular; quasi-realism's plausibility is undermined by an inability to explain disagreement, but not for the familiar reasons.
28
Lolordo, Antonia. « Person, Substance, Mode and ‘the moral Man’ in Locke's Philosophy ». Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40, no 4 (décembre 2010) : 643–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2010.10716738.
Texte intégralRésumé :
In 1769, the English bishop and theologian Edmund Law published a Defence of Mr. Locke's Opinion concerning Personal Identity. In this work, Law attempted to ‘explain and vindicate Mr. Locke's hypothesis’ (301) by offering a new account of Lockean persons. Law's account centers around three key claims. First, persons are modes — very roughly, properties — rather than substances. Second, the relevant properties are those that make moral evaluation appropriate, thus taking seriously Locke's insistence that ‘person’ is a forensic term. And third, the fact that persons are modes is what makes a demonstrative science of morality possible.I am not convinced that Law's interpretation actually vindicates Locke, though it does make his theory come out rather better than is typically imagined. I am, however, convinced that Law's interpretation provides the best available account of Lockean persons.
29
Anonymous. « Sunny vindication ? » Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union 76, no 18 (2 mai 1995) : 186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/eo076i018p00186-04.
Texte intégral
30
Antonioli, Frank. « Standards Vindication ». English Journal 86, no 4 (avril 1997) : 11. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/820979.
Texte intégral
31
Wim Klever. « A Vindication ». Hume Studies 17, no 2 (1991) : 209–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hms.1991.0002.
Texte intégral
32
Wolf, Gunther. « „Martyres vindicati“ ». Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte : Romanistische Abteilung 105, no 1 (1 août 1988) : 776–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.7767/zrgra.1988.105.1.776.
Texte intégral
33
Strelnikov, Pavel A. « A Vindicatory Action as a Legal Measure of Protection of Property Rights of Legal Entities ». Jurist 5 (13 mai 2021) : 49–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.18572/1812-3929-2021-5-49-55.
Texte intégralRésumé :
The vindication claim is a traditional way of protecting the legal entities real property. The problem of vindication does not lose its relevance in the conditions of the development of a market economy and property turnover both theoretically and practically. The main idea of this article is to identify the features of the vindication claim use as a way of protecting the legal entities real property. To achieve this goal, the author formulates the following tasks: the analysis of the possibility of the real property vindication; identification of the specifics of the real property as the vindication objects; the role of the real property state registration; identification of features of the vindication procedure in relation to the legal entity will; analysis of legal positions developed by judicial practice.
34
Wiese, Mitzi. « The The Legal Operation of Liens : Theory and Practice ». Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 24 (19 février 2021) : 1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2021/v24i0a8721.
Texte intégralRésumé :
The legal operation of liens has been the source of academic debates for many years. Liens are traditionally classified as enrichment liens and debtor-and-creditor liens (contractual liens). In the instance of an enrichment lien the creditor (lienholder) has a contract with a non-owner and not with the owner (debtor) himself. Consequently, the creditor can vest a lien against the owner of the thing only on the grounds of unjustified enrichment. Enrichment liens are classified as real rights. In the instance of a debtor-and-creditor lien (contractual lien) the creditor (lienholder) has a contract with the owner of the thing and the contract is the basis for the liability of the owner (debtor) towards the creditor. Debtor-and-creditor liens are generally classified as personal rights. This classification causes confusion regarding the legal operation on the one hand of an enrichment lien as a real right and on the other hand of a debtor-and-creditor lien (contractual lien) as a personal right. This paper proposes that the origin of the legal claim for which the lien serves as security (unjustified enrichment or contractual) merely determines the debt (expenses) for which a lienholder can vest his lien and does not determine the classification of a lien as either a real right or a personal right. A lien can be described as a defence against the owner's rei vindicatio and is, in principle, enforceable only against the owner of the thing (security object). A lien can, however, also be enforced against parties other than the owner, including the creditors (who, for example, want to attach the thing subject to the lien) of the owner (debtor) and other real claimants. The enforcement of a lien against these parties is referred to as the real operation (third-party action) of a lien. This paper analyses the legal operation of a lien with specific reference to the debt (expenses incurred) secured by the lien, the vesting (existence) of a lien, the real operation (third-party action) of a lien and the preferential position of a lienholder in the case of the debtor' insolvency.
35
Godayol, Pilar. « Mary Wollstonecraft en català ». Quaderns. Revista de traducció 29 (12 mai 2022) : 7–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/quaderns.56.
Texte intégralRésumé :
Mary Wollstonecraft (1759-1797) és un referent de la literatura feminista, i el seu A vindication of the rights of woman (1792), un dels tractats fundacionals. Aquest assaig es traduí al català el 2014, més de dos-cents anys després de la mort de l’autora, gairebé quaranta després de la primera traducció al castellà (1977) i deu després de la versió gallega (2004). Publicat per l’editorial gironina L’Art de la Memòria, traduït i prologat per Joan Josep Mussarra Roca, Vindicació dels drets de la dona arriba en una nova etapa d’auge editorial per al feminisme internacional. Quatre anys abans, el 2010, l’editorial valenciana Tres i Quatre n’havia editat Cartes sobre Suècia, Noruega i Dinamarca, versionades i introduïdes per Òscar Sabata i Teixidó. Aquest article, després de presentar breument la intel·lectual il·lustrada anglesa, resseguir-ne les traduccions a les altres llengües de l’Estat i contextualitzar els feminismes traduïts a Catalunya d’ençà de la dècada dels seixanta, se centra en la recepció catalana de Mary Wollstonecraft i en els factors que confluïren perquè una de les escriptores clàssiques de la història del feminisme fos introduïda al català tan tardanament.
36
Ives, E. W. « Henry VIII's will – a forensic conundrum ». Historical Journal 35, no 4 (décembre 1992) : 779–804. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0018246x00026169.
Texte intégralRésumé :
AbstractThe 30 December 1546 date for the finalizing of Henry VIll's will is vindicated and the text re-established as the king's own work, namely (1) the supposed priority of a copy dated 13 December is shown to be erroneous; (2) the hypothesis that the will was manipulated by faction is rejected because (a) a reconstruction of the operating procedure of the Dry Stamp Office indicates the strong probability of the traditional date, (b) analysis of provisions allegedly suggesting forgery reveals no valid grounds for suspicion, and (c) circumstantial evidence; (3) the real interest of the Seymour faction in January 1547 is demonstrated as lying in implementing the king's intentions. An hypothesis is offered as to the king's motives. The prominence given to reformers is explained as projecting forward a movement from orthodoxy to reform which was inherent in the Supremacy. The conciliar provisions for Edward's reign are argued to be an attempt to create a closed regency council which would prevent both faction and individual bids for supremacy. The fact that Edward Seymour could become de facto regent only by a coup which jettisoned the will, is a vindication of Henry's provisions.
37
O’Donnell, Jules. « Re-evaluating the Collateral Challenge in the Era of Statutory Interpretation ». Federal Law Review 48, no 1 (25 novembre 2019) : 69–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0067205x19890443.
Texte intégralRésumé :
A collateral challenge impugns the validity of an administrative decision in a proceeding that is not specifically designed for the modification or setting aside of that decision. On the current state of the law, there is a presumption in favour of collateral challenge in an inferior court, which can be displaced by a contrary legislative intention. I argue, however, that the current presumption lacks a clear doctrinal basis, and that it places too much emphasis on statutory interpretation as a useful tool for rebutting, or indeed vindicating, the starting presumption (let alone determining what administrative law ‘grounds’ a collateral challenge might encompass). I suggest a rearticulation of the presumption as an expression of a defendant’s entitlement to vindicate legal rights. I point out, however, that contemporary norms of administrative law may otherwise demand a stricter approach to permitting collateral challenges. On this alternative view, a challenger must identify clear legislative authorisation for what is essentially a judicial review function.
38
Siehr, Kurt. « Van der Wal, Tobias Bessel Donaas : Nemo condicit rem suam. Over de samenloop tussen de rei vindicatio en de condictio. – Leiden : Boom Juridisch 2019. XIV, 319 S. (E. M. Meijers Instituut voor Rechtswe ». Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht 83, no 3 (2019) : 692. http://dx.doi.org/10.1628/rabelsz-2019-0061.
Texte intégral
39
Fréine, Celia de, Kate Shanahan, Karola Dillenburger, Annie Murphy et Peter de Rosa. « Violence and Vindication ». Books Ireland, no 168 (1993) : 104. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20626726.
Texte intégral
40
Lantos, John D. « Vindication for SUPPORT ». New England Journal of Medicine 373, no 15 (8 octobre 2015) : 1393–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/nejmp1510876.
Texte intégral
41
ZABEEH, FARHANG. « Vindication of Hume1 ». Theoria 29, no 3 (11 février 2008) : 290–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.1963.tb00030.x.
Texte intégral
42
SFIKAS, PETER M. « Vindication in Court ». Journal of the American Dental Association 131, no 11 (novembre 2000) : 1633–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0095.
Texte intégral
43
Zanetti, Luca. « The Quest for Certainty ». Kriterion – Journal of Philosophy 35, no 1 (1 mars 2021) : 71–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/krt-2021-0005.
Texte intégralRésumé :
Abstract The aim of this paper is to vindicate the Cartesian quest for certainty by arguing that to aim at certainty is a constitutive feature of cognition. My argument hinges on three observations concerning the nature of doubt and judgment: first, it is always possible to have a doubt as to whether p in so far as one takes the truth of p to be uncertain; second, in so far as one takes the truth of p to be certain, one is no longer able to genuinely wonder whether p is true; third, to ask the question whether p is to desire to receive a true answer. On this ground I clarify in what sense certainty is the aim of cognition. I then argue that in judging that p we commit ourselves to p’s being certain and that certainty is the constitutive norm of judgment. The paper as a whole provides a picture of the interplay between doubt and judgment that aims at vindicating the traditional insight that our ability to doubt testifies our aspiration to know with absolute certainty.
44
Berardi, Michele. « ESCAPE DYNAMICS AND POLICY SPECIFICATION ». Macroeconomic Dynamics 17, no 1 (31 mai 2011) : 123–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1365100511000058.
Texte intégralRésumé :
In his monographThe Conquest of American Inflation(Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999), Sargent suggests that the sharp reduction in U.S. inflation that took place under Volker may vindicate the type of econometric policy evaluation famously criticized by Lucas (Carnegie–Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 19–46, 1976). At the core of this vindication story is the escape dynamics, recurrent sliding away from the path leading to the time-consistent suboptimal equilibrium level of inflation and toward the low-inflation, optimal, time-inconsistent Ramsey outcome: by recurrently estimating a reduced-form model, in fact, the policy maker could periodically learn an approximate version of the natural rate hypothesis and therefore be induced to disinflate the economy. Two elements seem important in this story: the type of model used by the policy maker to represent the economy, whether structural or reduced-form, and the policy specification, whether derived taking the private sector's expectations as given or as endogenous to the policy design. Although Sargent (1999) stresses the first element, we find that it is instead the second aspect that is crucial to generate recurrent periods of low inflation: the policy maker has to recognize the endogeneity of the private sector's expectations and refrain from exploiting ephemeral short-run trade-offs between inflation and unemployment.
45
Peña Vallejos, Rosa, et Rodrigo Colarte Olivares. « MARY WOLLSTONECRAFT Y LA VINDICACIÓN DE LOS DERECHOS FEMENINOS ». Revista de Filosofía 18, no 1 (2019) : 35–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.21703/2735-6353.2019.18.01.0003.
Texte intégralRésumé :
El presente artículo aborda la crítica de Mary Wollstonecraft (1759-1797) a la visión educativa que propone Rousseau en su obra El Emilio. El debate en cuestión es un episodio relevante en la histórica lucha reivindicativa de las mujeres, en la cual Wollstonecraft demanda, como derecho, un espacio público integral femenino. El tema que interesa tratar es si la propuesta de la autora de cambiar el paradigma de la esclava doméstica por el de una ciudadana ilustrada, supone el reconocimiento de la responsabilidad moral y cívica a las mujeres; y si el camino de otorgarles dignidad, por la vía de una educación equivalente entre los miembros de ambos sexos, supone necesariamente el abandono femenino de su papel formativo en los hogares como educadoras de sus hijos. Del mismo modo interesa determinar si, en el pensamiento de Wollstonecraft, la transformación de la maternidad como una tarea cívica y el reconocimiento de la mujer como sujeto racional sexuado, genera una visión de la racionalidad distinta que rompe con la masculina.
46
Malbin, D. A. « Possession as a Condition of Passive Legitimization in a Vindication Claim ». Actual Problems of Russian Law 17, no 9 (23 août 2022) : 83–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2022.142.9.083-093.
Texte intégralRésumé :
A vindication claim is one of the classic ways to protect property rights. Since, according to the construction of the vindication claim, the property is being destroyed as a result of someone else’s illegal possession, passive legitimization of the claim is associated with possession. At the same time, the question of who is the owner of the thing is controversial for the purposes of the claim. In the legal literature, the opinion has been confirmed about the applicability of the theory of possession (possessio civilis) to possession in the institute of vindication claim, which gives grounds to believe that not only the actual owner of the thing as the direct owner of the thing, but also the person who transferred the thing into temporary possession, as an indirect owner, is passively legitimized by the claim. This approach should be criticized, since possession in the vindication claim should be understood as the actual possession of a thing, and therefore the theory of direct and indirect possession is not applicable. Passively legitimized by a vindication claim is only the actual owner of the thing, as a person who does not fulfill a subjective duty owed to the owner.
47
Crummett, Dustin. « Freedom, Firearms, and Civil Resistance ». Journal of Ethics 25, no 2 (2 mars 2021) : 247–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10892-021-09365-3.
Texte intégralRésumé :
AbstractThe claim that guns can safeguard freedom is common in US political discourse. In light of a broadly republican understanding of freedom, I evaluate this claim and its implications. The idea is usually that firearms would enable citizens to engage in revolutionary violence against a tyrannical government. I argue that some of the most common objections to this argument fail, but that the argument is fairly weak in light of other objections. I then defend a different argument for the claim that guns can safeguard freedom. I claim that firearm ownership among members of oppressed groups can hinder the use of systematic violence aimed at preventing them from exercising their basic liberties. I show how a commitment to armed self-defense is compatible with non-violent civil resistance as a tool of political change, and show how the former facilitated the latter during the Civil Rights Movement. Finally, I consider the policy implications of my argument. I don’t think it vindicates lax gun control policies. However, it may vindicate some individuals acquiring guns and learning how to use them, and some organizations aiding them in doing so.
48
Langhu, Koberson. « A Critical Evaluation of The Last Generation Theology (LGT) of (L) ML Andreasen Through the Lens of The Scriptures and The Writings of Ellen G. White ». Spicer Adventist University Research Articles Journal 1, no 2 (31 octobre 2022) : 14–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.56934/sauraj.v1i2.124.
Texte intégralRésumé :
Milian Lauritz Andreasen (1876-1962) was the leading and most influential Adventist theologian in the 1930s and 1940s. His foremost contribution to Adventist theology is the Last Generation Theology (LGT), according to which there will be a group of faithful last-generation believers just before the Second Coming of Jesus who will live a perfectly sinless life and vindicate the character of God. Andreasen died in 1962, but his theology is well and alive. It has been a point of controversy and debate among Adventist theologians. The main purpose of the study is to review whether Andreasen’s LGT is in accordance with the Scriptures and the writings of Ellen White. The study reveals that Andreasen’s theology has many grains of truth thus, cannot be dismissed as completely incorrect and irrelevant. However, it fails in some major aspects, such as its insistence on the sinless perfection of the saints and their role in vindicating God’s character. Scriptures and the Spirit of Prophecy portray relative perfection in the earthly life of a believer until glorification rather than absolute perfection. Thus, Andreasen’s LGT cannot be accepted in its entirety.
49
Gorney, Mark. « Of Vindication and Rationality ». Annals of Plastic Surgery 58, no 3 (mars 2007) : 345–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000257645.87236.b8.
Texte intégral
50
Roeper, Peter. « A Vindication of Logicism ». Philosophia Mathematica 24, no 3 (7 septembre 2015) : 360–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/philmat/nkv026.
Texte intégral