Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « Trust ecosystem »
Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres
Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « Trust ecosystem ».
À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.
Articles de revues sur le sujet "Trust ecosystem"
Muldoon, Jeffrey, Antonina Bauman et Carol Lucy. « Entrepreneurial ecosystem : do you trust or distrust ? » Journal of Enterprising Communities : People and Places in the Global Economy 12, no 2 (14 mai 2018) : 158–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jec-07-2017-0050.
Texte intégralRehman, Muhammad Habib ur, Khaled Salah, Ernesto Damiani et Davor Svetinovic. « Trust in Blockchain Cryptocurrency Ecosystem ». IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 67, no 4 (novembre 2020) : 1196–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tem.2019.2948861.
Texte intégralCobben, Dieudonnee, et Nadine Roijakkers. « The Dynamics of Trust and Control in Innovation Ecosystems ». International Journal of Innovation 7, no 1 (2 janvier 2019) : 01–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.5585/iji.v7i1.341.
Texte intégralRuotsalainen, Pekka, Bernd Blobel et Seppo Pohjolainen. « Privacy and Trust in eHealth : A Fuzzy Linguistic Solution for Calculating the Merit of Service ». Journal of Personalized Medicine 12, no 5 (19 avril 2022) : 657. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12050657.
Texte intégralOumaima, Smyej, et Ben Massou S. Mohamed. « The Conditions of the Emergence of Innovation Ecosystems : A Panoramic View ». International Journal of Business and Management 17, no 12 (3 novembre 2022) : 44. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v17n12p44.
Texte intégralD'Hauwers, Ruben, Nils Walravens et Pieter Ballon. « Data Ecosystem Business Models ». Journal of Business Models 10, no 2 (3 novembre 2022) : 1–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.54337/jbm.v10i2.6946.
Texte intégralLiu, Bo, Yun-Fei Shao, Guowei Liu et Debing Ni. « An Evolutionary Analysis of Relational Governance in an Innovation Ecosystem ». SAGE Open 12, no 2 (avril 2022) : 215824402210930. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21582440221093044.
Texte intégralMarche, Claudio, et Michele Nitti. « Can We Trust Trust Management Systems ? » IoT 3, no 2 (23 mars 2022) : 262–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/iot3020015.
Texte intégralZhang, Hui, Huanhuan Xiong et Jianxin Xu. « Dynamic Simulation Research on the Effect of Governance Mechanism on Value Co-Creation of Blockchain Industry Ecosystem ». Sustainability 14, no 12 (10 juin 2022) : 7107. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14127107.
Texte intégralGlukhov, V. V., A. V. Babkin, E. V. Shkarupeta et V. A. Plotnikov. « Strategic Management of Industrial Ecosystems Based on the Platform Concept ». Economics and Management 27, no 10 (17 novembre 2021) : 751–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2021-10-751-765.
Texte intégralThèses sur le sujet "Trust ecosystem"
Pascuccio, Fernando Antonio. « Augmenting the Internet with a Trust Ecosystem for inter pares interactions ». Doctoral thesis, Universita degli studi di Salerno, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10556/2465.
Texte intégralThe Internet is an extraordinary communications medium but it is not free from problems that are limiting its potential further development. In this dissertation we analyze and address some of the issues that make it an unsafe and unreliable place and we exhibit the most difficult issues that, as soon as possible, would deserve to be resolved such as: the uncertainty of the identities; the almost complete lack of privacy and of guarantees on the reliability of the counterparts (i.e., the lack of trust among people); the lack of control and ownership of the information regarding a person or a company; the lack of specific information about service providers; the exploitation of anonymity to perform malicious actions. These issues mainly arise from the very nature of the Internet which is a deregulated place where users have the possibility to act and communicate in total freedom while keeping the anonymity. However, these aspects should, in our opinion, be balanced with the protection of the fundamental users’ rights. The main goal of our research is to combine the positive aspects and the strengths of the Internet with the need to introduce environments or areas where users can enjoy greater mutual trust. To this aim, we proposed a solution to augment the Internet to make it a safer and more reliable place. Our proposal allows users to interact with higher security than at present and to have better guarantees on the respect for their rights and their needs. In other words, based on the above reasons, in this work our objective is the design of a comprehensive framework aimed at providing a trust area in the Internet that combines the online and offline world smoothly and seamlessly, including the best solutions in a single model. Our integrated and modular model is called Trust Ecosystem (TEco) where “ecosystem” means an environment where the entities (e.g., users and online services) preserve the system and comply with fixed rules, are proactive and responsive as each of them, using a reward-punishment mechanism (feedback), contribute to the success of the system and, consequently, to their own benefit. The TEco was built by integrating different innovative systems. It is a Internetbased area in which users: own a Trusted Digital Identity to authenticate keeping anonymity; establish Inter Pares Interactions based on contracted agreements and knowing each other’s reputation; can be the owners of the information they produce and protect their privacy. The coexistence of these features makes the TEco a trust area. In fact, users can mutually trust, as they are all identifiable, their reputation is known and while interacting, they can bargain conditions with law effectiveness. Furthermore, depending on their needs and the demands of others, users can decide which information to disseminate, protecting their privacy or maintaining complete anonymity. The TEco has been conceived without “upheavals” of the current Internet and for this reason the TEco can develop in parallel with it and, in any case, they can coexist. In fact, the users will not be forced to drastically change the way in which they normally use both Internet services and Web browsing. In our view, to obtain a Trust Area there is the need of effective Trust and Reputation systems. Although new Trust, Reputation and Recommendation (TRR) models are continuously proposed in literature, they lack shared bases and goals. For this reason, in this work we pay special attention to the problems related to Trust and Reputation management that are among the most controversial issues of the Internet. So, we address trust and reputation in all their aspects and we define an innovative meta model to facilitate the definition and standardization of a generic TRR model. Following the meta model, researchers in the field will be able to define standard models, compare them with other models and reuse parts of them. A standardization is also needed to determine which properties should be present in a TRR model. In accordance with the objectives we were seeking, following our meta model we have: defined a pre-standardized TRR model for e-commerce; identified the fundamental concepts and the main features that contribute to form trust and reputation in that domain; respected the dependence on the context/role of trust and reputation; aggregated only homogeneous trust information; listed and shown how to defend from the main malicious attacks. Lastly, in this work, we also discuss the feasibility of the Trust Ecosystem, the compatibility with the current Internet and the things to do for putting it into practice. For this purpose, we show some scenarios that also highlight and make advantages and potentiality of the TEco fully understandable. In the future, the TEco may also act as a “field of comparison” and facilitate scientific communication in the sector and, like a digital ecosystem, can play the role of a unification “umbrella” over significant, challenging and visionary computing approaches that emerge in parallel. [edited by author]
Internet é uno straordinario strumento di comunicazione ma non é immune da criticitá che ne stanno limitando l’ulteriore potenziale sviluppo. In questa dissertazione analizziamo e affrontiamo alcune delle problematiche che lo rendono un luogo poco sicuro e inaffidabile ed esponiamo le questioni piú spinose che meriterebbero al piú presto di essere risolte come: l’incertezza dell’identitá, la quasi totale mancanza di privacy e di garanzie sull’affidabilitá delle controparti (cioé la mancanza di fiducia tra le persone), la mancanza di controllo e proprietá delle informazioni riguardo ad una persona o ad una compagnia, la mancanza di specifiche informazioni riguardo i service provider, lo sfruttamento dell’anonimato per eseguire azioni dolose. Tali problematiche scaturiscono principalmente dalla natura stessa dell’attuale Internet che é un luogo deregolamentato in cui gli utenti hanno la possibilitá di agire e comunicare in totale libertá mantenendo l’anonimato. Tuttavia, tali aspetti andrebbero, a nostro avviso, bilanciati con la salvaguardia dei diritti fondamentali degli utenti. L’obiettivo principale della nostra ricerca é stato quello di coniugare gli aspetti positivi e i punti di forza dell’attuale Internet con la necessitá di introdurre ambienti o zone in cui gli utenti possano godere di una maggiore fiducia reciproca. A tal proposito abbiamo proposto una soluzione per aumentare l’Internet e per renderlo un posto piú sicuro e affidabile. La nostra proposta fa si che gli utenti possano interagire con maggiore sicurezza rispetto a quanto avviene attualmente ed avere maggiori garanzie sul rispetto dei propri diritti e delle proprie esigenze. In altre parole, per quanto detto finora, l’obiettivo di questo lavoro é la progettazione di un framework globale volto a fornire una trust area in Internet che unisca il mondo online e offline in modo fluido e senza soluzione di continuitá, includendo le migliori soluzioni in un unico modello. Il nostro modello integrato e modulare viene chiamato Trust Ecosystem (TEco) dove per “ecosystem” si intende un ambiente in cui le entitá (per esempio gli utenti e i servizi online) preservano il sistema e rispettano regole prefissate, sono proattive e reattive poiché ognuna di esse, utilizzando un meccanismo di premio-punizione (feedback), contribuisce al successo del sistema e, conseguentemente, al proprio beneficio. Il TEco é stato costruito integrando differenti ed innovativi sistemi. Esso é una Internet-based area in cui gli utenti: possiedono una Trusted Digital Identity per autenticarsi mantenendo l’anonimato, stabiliscono Inter Pares Interactions basate su un contratto concordato e conoscendo la reputazione di tutti gli altri, sono proprietari delle informazioni che producono e proteggono la loro privacy. La coesistenza di queste caratteristiche rende il TEco una trust area. Infatti gli utenti possono fidarsi reciprocamente poiché sono tutti identificabili, la loro reputazione é nota e mentre interagiscono, possono contrattare condizioni aventi forza di legge. Inoltre, in base alle loro necessitá e alle richieste degli altri, gli utenti possono decidere quali informazioni divulgare, proteggere la loro privacy o mantenere il completo anonimato. Il TEco é stato concepito senza richiedere sconvolgimenti dell’attuale Internet e per questa ragione puó svilupparsi in parallelo con esso e, in ogni caso, essi possono coesistere. Infatti, gli utenti non saranno obbligati a cambiare drasticamente il modo in cui essi normalmente usano i servizi Internet e il Web. A nostro avviso, per ottenere una Trust Area c’é bisogno di sistemi di Trust and Reputation systems efficaci. Sebbene nuovi Trust, Reputation and Recommendation (TRR) models vengano continuamente proposti in letteratura, essi mancano di basi e obiettivi condivisi. Per questa ragione, in questo lavoro abbiamo posto speciale attenzione ai problemi relativi alla Trust and Reputation management che sono tra le problematiche piú controverse di Internet. Per questo, abbiamo affrontato la trust e la reputation in tutti i loro aspetti e definito un innovativo meta model per facilitare la definizione e standardizzazione di un generico TRR model. Seguendo il nostro meta model, i ricercatori del settore potranno definire modelli standard, compararli con gli altri modelli e riusare parti di essi. Una standardizzazione é necessaria anche per determinare quali proprietá dovrebbero essere presenti in un TRR model. Conformemente agli obiettivi che ci eravamo proposti, seguendo il nostro meta model abbiamo: definito un TRR model per l’e-commerce pre-standardizzato, identificato i concetti fondamentali e le principali caratteristiche che contribuiscono a formare la trust e la reputation in quel dominio, rispettato la dipendenza della trust e della reputazione dal contesto/ruolo, aggregato solo trust information omogenee, elencato e mostrato come difendersi dai principali malicious attacks. Infine, in questo lavoro, discutiamo anche della fattibilitá del Trust Ecosystem, della compatibilitá con l’attuale Internet e le cose da fare per poterlo mettere in pratica. Per questo motivo, mostriamo anche alcuni scenari che evidenziano e rendono pienamente comprensibili i vantaggi e le potenzialitá del TEco. In futuro, il TEco potrebbe anche agire come un terreno di confronto e facilitare la comunicazione scientifica nel settore e, come un ecosistema digitale, puó giocare il ruolo di un "ombrello" unificante sugli approcci significativi, stimolanti e visionari che emergeranno in parallelo. [a cura dell'autore]
XIV n.s.
Pessot, Olivier. « Small Businesses and how they connect to the Sustainable City : A list of actions for the transformation to a sustainable Paris ». Thesis, Stockholms universitet, Stockholm Resilience Centre, 2011. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-61674.
Texte intégralGerling, Sebastian Rainer Verfasser], et Michael [Akademischer Betreuer] [Backes. « Plugging in trust and privacy : three systems to improve widely used ecosystems / Sebastian Rainer Gerling. Betreuer : Michael Backes ». Saarbrücken : Saarländische Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek, 2014. http://d-nb.info/106430575X/34.
Texte intégralHesse, Maik [Verfasser], Timm [Akademischer Betreuer] Teubner, Timm [Gutachter] Teubner, Rüdiger [Gutachter] Zarnekow et Maik [Gutachter] Lachmann. « Essays on trust and reputation portability in digital platform ecosystems / Maik Hesse ; Gutachter : Timm Teubner, Rüdiger Zarnekow, Maik Lachmann ; Betreuer : Timm Teubner ». Berlin : Technische Universität Berlin, 2021. http://d-nb.info/1231908238/34.
Texte intégral« RAProp : Ranking Tweets by Exploiting the Tweet/User/Web Ecosystem ». Master's thesis, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.17893.
Texte intégralDissertation/Thesis
M.S. Computer Science 2013
Gordon, Ryan Patrick. « Public perceptions of sagebrush ecosystem management : a longitudinal panel study of residents in the Great Basin, 2006-2010 ». Thesis, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/1957/29100.
Texte intégralGraduation date: 2012
Vogt, Nora. « Trust and Reciprocity in the Market-Based Provision of Public Goods. Experimental Evidence and Applications to Conservation Tenders ». Doctoral thesis, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-1735-0000-0022-609C-7.
Texte intégralIsherwood, Donovan Anthony. « TrustCV : supporting reputation-based trust for collectivist digital business ecosystems ». Thesis, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10210/11427.
Texte intégralIn Africa, the economy is largely dominated by SMMEs that represent 90% of private businesses and contribute to more than 50% of employment and GDP. However, these SMMEs struggle to sustain their businesses in the current economic climate. To address this, advancements in mobile and cloud technology introduce new possibilities such as digital business ecosystems to support environment where small, micro, and medium enterprises can interoperate. The fundamental challenge for SMMEs in a digital business ecosystem is the selection of transaction partners. SMMEs are interested to transact with other SMMEs that will benefit their business through successful transactions. This leads to the sustainability and growth of SMMEs and consequently the economy. However, not all SMMEs behave as predicted and therefore, being able to trust another SMME in the digital business ecosystem is important. Trust is an essential part of business and personal life. The social nature of trust makes trust very personalised and for each individual, trust is interpreted, understood and perceived according to past experience and social behaviour. These factors are largely influenced by cultural norms and behaviours that individuals conform to. In African and some other regions, collectivist cultural norms and behaviours are common whereas in Westernised regions, individualist cultures are common. Therefore, it is not enough to just consider trust from a technical perspective but also from a cultural perspective. For small businesses in Africa and other regions in the world, this is especially true. Compared to larger companies in developed economies, SMMEs in Africa are more informal and operate in a more personal manner. This implies that trust decisions are largely influence an owner or employee’s cultural norms and behaviour. The research conducted in this dissertation proposes a trust model, known as Trustcv that supports the cultural norms and behaviours of collectivist cultures for trust in a digital business ecosystem. Digital business ecosystems, trust, culture and social network analysis provide the literature foundation for Trustcv. The effectiveness of Trustcv is measured through simulations of a digital business ecosystem in Africa, which provides interesting results compared to an existing trust model. The results indicate that Trustcv could be used to support trust in collectivist digital business ecosystems used by collectivist cultural SMMEs.
Turnipseed, Mary P. « Re-imagining the Public Trust Doctrine to Conserve U.S. Ocean Ecosystems ». Diss., 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/3876.
Texte intégralSustainably managing marine ecosystems has proved extremely difficult, with few success stories. Traditional approaches to managing ocean-borne activities, including the structure of the governance systems themselves, have had difficulty keeping pace with the dynamics of coupled human, ecological, and oceanographic systems. In essence, our governance systems for ocean resources and environments have had difficulty keeping pace with advances in ocean use and exploitation technologies.
In the United States today there are over twenty federal agencies and thirty-five coastal states and territories operating under hundreds of statutory authorities shaping coastal and ocean policy. For years, among marine ecologists and policy experts there has been consensus that a major overhaul in U.S. ocean governance is necessary. This dissertation broadly suggests the public trust doctrine--an ancient legal concept that is already incorporated in U.S. state coastal laws--could uniquely provide a critical legal foundation for a new era in U.S. federal ocean governance.
Though the public trust concept can be located in the legal systems of many countries, it robustly manifests in the United States, where it has historically protected the public's rights to fishing, navigation, and commerce in and over navigable waterways and tidal waters. In its most basic form, the doctrine obliges governments to manage common natural resources, the body of the trust, in the best interest of their citizens, the beneficiaries of the trust. Today the public trust doctrine is integral to the protection of coastal ecosystems and beach access in many states and has even made its way into state constitutions. It would be simple, and seemingly logical, to assume that the same fiduciary responsibility of states to protect public trust uses of their waters extends to all marine resources within the United States' 200-mile Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). However an artificial line has been drawn around state waters, and the legal authority and responsibility of the U.S. government to protect public trust resources in the vast space of its EEZ (the largest of any country on earth) have never been fully and expressly established. The second chapter in this dissertation outlines the development of states' public trust doctrines; discusses the expansion of U.S. sovereignty over its neighboring ocean waters during the twentieth century; analyzes possible avenues for expanding the doctrine to federal waters; and considers how a federal public trust doctrine could clarify some specific issues in U.S. oceans management. At the heart of this chapter's analysis lie three questions: (1) does a federal public trust doctrine exist; (2) if so, can it be rightfully extended to include the entirety of the U.S. ocean waters; and (3) could the doctrine provide the missing catalyst for federal agencies to manage the use of U.S. ocean resources in a coordinated, sustainable fashion?
The third chapter asks how the public trust doctrine could inform marine spatial planning in US waters. It argues that in the absence of a statutory mandate for agencies to collaborate in their management of ocean-borne activities, the public trust doctrine could provide a framework for restructuring the way the US federal government regulates ocean uses. The forth chapter examines the blowout of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig on April 20, 2010, and surmises that regulatory capture of the Minerals Management Service aided by a balkanized ocean governance regime in the pre-Deepwater Horizon era provided a potent source of systemic risk in the U.S. offshore oil and gas industry. It discusses the factors contributing to MMS' susceptibility to capture in the pre-Deepwater Horizon era, as well as examples of decisions it made that suggest dynamics of regulatory capture were at play. The chapter then explores the reform of offshore oil and gas regulation under BOERME and the National Ocean Council to understand the how these new governmental structures might be less susceptible to capture. Lastly, the chapter considers the added value of extending two alternative versions of a clear federal public trust mandate - a foundational US natural resources doctrine - to offshore oil and gas regulation and, more generally, to coastal and marine spatial planning under the National Ocean Council.
The final substantive chapter of this dissertation concerns the US Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force and reports the results of a case study analysis that I conducted to explore how and why the Task Force designed the National Ocean Policy and interagency governance structure, the National Ocean Council, like it did. I found that the recommendations of the Task Force drew heavily from previous studies of US federal ocean policy and the Committee on Ocean Policy, which lasted from 2004-2009. Additionally I sought to understand the Task Force within the context of other US interagency collaborative efforts and theories concerning collaborative governance. I found that the Task Force process was characterized by several characteristics that policy scholars have previously identified as important to promoting collaboration among agencies. I also found support for the theoretical proposition that often external and political factors have major impacts on the level of success attained by interagency efforts. Lastly, via interviews with Task Force staffers and content analysis of public comments submitted to the Task Force, I determined that - though not included in the National Ocean Policy - there remains interest in the principles of the public trust doctrine as underpinning for the policy, which seeks "[t]o achieve an America whose stewardship ensures that the ocean, our coasts, and the Great Lakes are healthy and resilient, safe and productive, and understood and treasured so as to promote the well-being, prosperity, and security of present and future generations."
Dissertation
Schmidt, S. « A trust-aware framework for service selection and service quality review in e-business ecosystems ». Thesis, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10453/37705.
Texte intégralAs e-Business has moved from a niche market to a decisive contributor for the success of most companies, some issues need to be solved in order to assist the continued success of e-Business. The challenge, to deploy fully autonomous business service agents which undertake transactions on behalf of their owners, often fails due to lack of trust in the agent and its decisions. Four aspects can overcome this challenge. Firstly, intelligent agents need to be equipped with self-adjusting reputation, trustworthiness and credibility evaluation mechanisms to assess the trustworthiness of potential counterparts prior to a business transaction. Secondly, such evaluation mechanisms must be transparent and easy to comprehend so agent owners develop trust in their agents’ decisions. Thirdly, the calculations of an agent must be highly customisable so that the agent owner can apply his personal experiences and security requirements to govern the decision making process of the intelligent agent. And finally, agents must communicate via standardised and open protocols in order to facilitate interaction between services deployed across different architectures and technologies. This thesis proposes the DEco Arch framework which integrates behavioural trust element relationships into various decision making processes found in e-Business ecosystems. We apply fuzzy-logic based soft computing techniques to increase user confidence and therefore enhance the adoption of the proposed assessment and review methodologies. A proof-of-concept implementation of the DEco Arch framework has been developed to showcase the proposed concepts in a case study and to conduct empirical experiments to evaluate the robustness and practicability of the proposed methodologies.
Livres sur le sujet "Trust ecosystem"
Thompson, Sara. State trust lands internship at Northwest Ecosystem Alliance. Bellingham, WA : Huxley College of the Environment, Western Washington University, 2002.
Trouver le texte intégralJohnson, Jennifer Lee. Washington State Trust Lands management reform : Canada/U.S. softwood lumber trade : Northwest Ecosystem Alliance. Bellingham, WA : Huxley College of Environmental Studies, Western Washington University, 2001.
Trouver le texte intégralUnited States. Congress. House. Committee on Natural Resources. Ecosystem management : Sustaining the nation's natural resources trust : majority staff report of the Committee on Natural Resources of the U.S. House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, second session. Washington : U.S. G.P.O., 1994.
Trouver le texte intégralRehman, Muhammad Habib ur, Davor Svetinovic, Khaled Salah et Ernesto Damiani, dir. Trust Models for Next-Generation Blockchain Ecosystems. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75107-4.
Texte intégralAskoxylakis, Ioannis, Henrich C. Pöhls et Joachim Posegga, dir. Information Security Theory and Practice. Security, Privacy and Trust in Computing Systems and Ambient Intelligent Ecosystems. Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30955-7.
Texte intégralC, Pöhls Henrich, Posegga Joachim et SpringerLink (Online service), dir. Information Security Theory and Practice. Security, Privacy and Trust in Computing Systems and Ambient Intelligent Ecosystems : 6th IFIP WG 11.2 International Workshop, WISTP 2012, Egham, UK, June 20-22, 2012. Proceedings. Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012.
Trouver le texte intégralIsaca. Digital Trust Ecosystem Framework. Information Systems Audit and Control Association, 2022.
Trouver le texte intégralEcosystem management : Sustaining the nation's natural resources trust : majority staff report of the Committee on Natural Resources of the U.S. House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, second session. Washington : U.S. G.P.O., 1994.
Trouver le texte intégralUS GOVERNMENT. Ecosystem management : Sustaining the nation's natural resources trust : Majority staff report of the Committee on Natural Resources of the U.S. House of ... One Hundred Third Congress, second session. For sale by the U.S. G.P.O., Supt. of Docs., Congressional Sales Office, 1994.
Trouver le texte intégralDamiani, Ernesto, Khaled Salah, Muhammad Habib ur Rehman et Davor Svetinovic. Trust Models for Next-Generation Blockchain Ecosystems. Springer International Publishing AG, 2022.
Trouver le texte intégralChapitres de livres sur le sujet "Trust ecosystem"
Tanniru, Mohan, Jianyu Niu, Chen Feng, Claudio Gottschalg Duque, Chang Lu et Harish Krishnan. « Incentives to Engage Blockchain and Ecosystem Actors ». Dans Building Decentralized Trust, 35–61. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54414-0_3.
Texte intégralShahzad, Khuram, et Shahid Hafeez. « Digital trust in business ecosystem collaboration ». Dans Trust, Digital Business and Technology, 242–54. New York : Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003266495-22.
Texte intégralShahzad, Khuram, et Josu Takala. « Understanding the Impact of Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Interactions on Innovative Capabilities : Toward a Conceptual Framework ». Dans Trust and Digital Business, 77–89. New York : Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003266525-8.
Texte intégralHeinecke, Stephanie. « The Game of Trust : Reflections on Truth and Trust in a Shifting Media Ecosystem ». Dans Media Trust in a Digital World, 3–13. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30774-5_1.
Texte intégralAinamo, Antti, Ergo Pikas et Kari Mikkelä. « University Ecosystem for Student Startups : A ‘Platform of Trust’ Perspective ». Dans Educating Engineers for Future Industrial Revolutions, 269–76. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68201-9_28.
Texte intégralOtto, Boris. « The Evolution of Data Spaces ». Dans Designing Data Spaces, 3–15. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93975-5_1.
Texte intégralHou, Fang, Siamak Farshidi et Slinger Jansen. « TrustSECO : A Distributed Infrastructure for Providing Trust in the Software Ecosystem ». Dans Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 121–33. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79022-6_11.
Texte intégralPlatt, Jodyn, Sherri Douville et Ann Mongoven. « How Can We Trust in IoT ? The Role of Engineers in Ensuring Trust in the Clinical IoT Ecosystem ». Dans Women Securing the Future with TIPPSS for Connected Healthcare, 83–113. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93592-4_5.
Texte intégralTocco, Fabrice, et Laurent Lafaye. « Data Platform Solutions ». Dans Designing Data Spaces, 383–93. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93975-5_23.
Texte intégralSu, Bo-chiuan, Li-Wei Wu et Ying-Chi Yen. « Transferring Customers Trust and Loyalty on Offline Banks Towards Online Payment Platforms in Integrated Ecosystem ». Dans HCI in Business, Government and Organizations, 293–306. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77750-0_19.
Texte intégralActes de conférences sur le sujet "Trust ecosystem"
Jaroucheh, Zakwan, Mohamad Alissa et William J. Buchanan. « Trust-based Ecosystem to Combat Fake News ». Dans 2020 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC). IEEE, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icbc48266.2020.9169435.
Texte intégralZhang, Zhiyong. « Security, trust and risk in Digital Rights Management ecosystem ». Dans Simulation (HPCS). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/hpcs.2010.5547093.
Texte intégralIsherwood, Donovan, et Marijke Coetzee. « Enhancing Digital Business Ecosystem trust and reputation with centrality measures ». Dans 2011 Information Security for South Africa (ISSA). IEEE, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/issa.2011.6027535.
Texte intégralRAZA, MUHAMMAD, FAROOKH KHADEER HUSSAIN, OMAR KHADEER HUSSAIN et ELIZABETH CHANG. « MD2 METRICS FOR OPTIMIZING TRUST PREDICTION IN DIGITAL BUSINESS ECOSYSTEM ». Dans Proceedings of the 4th International ISKE Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789814295062_0063.
Texte intégralLiau, David, Razieh Nokhbeh Zaeem et K. Suzanne Barber. « Evaluation Framework for Future Privacy Protection Systems : A Dynamic Identity Ecosystem Approach ». Dans 2019 17th International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST). IEEE, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/pst47121.2019.8949059.
Texte intégralSchmidt, Kaja, Alexander Muhle, Andreas Gruner et Christoph Meinel. « Clear the Fog : Towards a Taxonomy of Self-Sovereign Identity Ecosystem Members ». Dans 2021 18th International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST). IEEE, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/pst52912.2021.9647797.
Texte intégralKoskinen, Jani, Mikko M. Rantanen et Sami Hyrynsalmi. « Ethical governance of e-government ecosystem ». Dans Enabling Technology for a Sustainable Society. University of Maribor Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-362-3.14.
Texte intégralda Silva, Saulo Jose, et Jorge Miguel Reis Silva. « Cyber Risks In The Aviation Ecosystem : An Approach Through A Trust Framework ». Dans 2021 Integrated Communications Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS). IEEE, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icns52807.2021.9441596.
Texte intégralGiannoutakis, Konstantinos N., et Maria Petrou. « The effect of trust in product chains in a Digital Business Ecosystem ». Dans 2007 Inaugural IEEE-IES Digital EcoSystems and Technologies Conference. IEEE, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/dest.2007.371982.
Texte intégralGrispos, George, Frank Tursi, Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo, William Mahoney et William Bradley Glisson. « A Digital Forensics Investigation of a Smart Scale IoT Ecosystem ». Dans 2021 IEEE 20th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom). IEEE, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/trustcom53373.2021.00104.
Texte intégralRapports d'organisations sur le sujet "Trust ecosystem"
Hart, Lucy. Understanding platform businesses in the food ecosystem. Food Standards Agency, février 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.46756/sci.fsa.puh821.
Texte intégralFlagg, Melissa, et Zachary Arnold. A New Institutional Approach to Research Security in the United States : Defending a Diverse R&D Ecosystem. Center for Security and Emerging Technology, janvier 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.51593/20200051.
Texte intégralSOLOVYANENKO, N. I. CROSS-BORDER BUSINESS OPERATIONS IN DIGITAL ECOSYSTEMS OF THE EAEU : LEGAL ISSUES. DOI CODE, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.18411/0131-5226-2021-70003.
Texte intégralFairhurst, Vanessa, Chieh-Chih Estelle Cheng, Xiaoli Chen et Cameron Neylon. Better Together : Open new possibilities with Open Infrastructure (APAC time zones). Chair Hideaki Takeda. Crossref, juin 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.13003/xdvu4372.
Texte intégralAfrican Open Science Platform Part 1 : Landscape Study. Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf), 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/assaf.2019/0047.
Texte intégral