Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « Television broadcasting – European Union countries »
Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres
Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « Television broadcasting – European Union countries ».
À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.
Articles de revues sur le sujet "Television broadcasting – European Union countries"
Meyer, Manfred. « Educational Television in Member Countries of the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) ». Educational Media International 28, no 4 (décembre 1991) : 209–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0952398910280408.
Texte intégralSehl, Annika, Richard Fletcher et Robert G. Picard. « Crowding out : Is there evidence that public service media harm markets ? A cross-national comparative analysis of commercial television and online news providers ». European Journal of Communication 35, no 4 (28 février 2020) : 389–409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0267323120903688.
Texte intégralTereshchuk, Vitaliy. « Political and Institutional Characteristics of the Entry of the CEE Region into Regional Media Systems During the Bipolar and Post-Bipolar Periods ». Politeja 15, no 6(57) (13 août 2019) : 215–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.12797/politeja.15.2018.57.12.
Texte intégralPivnitskaya, Olga V. « A True Teacher Is the One from Whom You Want to Learn All Your Life ». Musical Art and Education 8, no 3 (2020) : 149–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.31862//2309-1428-2020-8-3-149-158.
Texte intégralKRASNOSTUP, H. « Legal aspects of the formation and implementation of state policy in the field of television and radio broadcasting ». INFORMATION AND LAW, no 1(13) (20 mai 2015) : 68–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.37750/2616-6798.2015.1(13).272604.
Texte intégralVarney, Mike. « European Controls on Member State Promotion and Regulation of Public Service Broadcasting and Broadcasting Standards ». European Public Law 10, Issue 3 (1 septembre 2004) : 503–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/euro2004030.
Texte intégralKatsirea, Irini. « The Transmission State Principle : The End of the Broadcasting Sovereignty of the Member States ? » Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 6 (2004) : 105–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.5235/152888712802759485.
Texte intégralKatsirea, Irini. « The Transmission State Principle : The End of the Broadcasting Sovereignty of the Member States ? » Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 6 (2004) : 105–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1528887000003608.
Texte intégralGaletić, Fran. « Market position of public television in post-transition countries of the European Union from 1995 to 2019 ». Ekonomski pregled 73, no 4 (2022) : 571–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.32910/ep.73.4.4.
Texte intégralDillon, Thomas. « TV Quotas Under the AVMS Directive After Brexit ». Journal of World Trade 56, Issue 2 (1 mars 2022) : 307–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/trad2022013.
Texte intégralThèses sur le sujet "Television broadcasting – European Union countries"
Sousa, Helena. « Communications policy in Portugal and its links with the European Union : an analysis of the telecommunications and television broadcasting sectors from the mid-1980's until the mid-1990's ». Thesis, City University London, 1996. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.319649.
Texte intégralKarayannis, Vassilios-Petros. « Liberté économique et défense de l'intérêt général : le problème de retransmission par câble des émissions télévisées dans l'Union européenne ». Doctoral thesis, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/2013/ULB-DIPOT:oai:dipot.ulb.ac.be:2013/211205.
Texte intégralEn ce qui concerne l’accès des émissions aux réseaux câblés, la thèse met en avant le besoin de sauvegarder un service public de l’audiovisuel. Celui-ci est défini comme un ensemble des règles qui visent à la fois le paysage audiovisuel propre à chaque Etat membre (par exemple pluralisme) et le contenu des émissions proprement dit (émissions informatives, éducatives, épanouissement culturel etc.). Le droit communautaire primaire et dérivé, tel qu’interprété par la Cour de justice, fournit les moyens de conciliation entre, d’une part les intérêts généraux et, d’autre part, les exigences découlant de la libre prestation de services et de la libre concurrence.
En ce qui concerne l’application des droits intellectuels, la thèse aborde la problématique liée à l’épuisement ou la subsistance de ceux-ci. Dans le cas de la câblodistribution, la Cour a affirmé la subsistance du droit. Cette position est corroboré par la nouvelle directive européenne sur le droit d’auteur et les droits voisins dans la société de l’information. La thèse appuie la position de subsistance en considérant qu’elle constitue une condition essentielle pour la juste récompense des auteurs.
Enfin, la thèse aborde les questions plus spécifiques qui naissent à propos de la convergence technologique et juridique. Tout d’abord, il est avancé que le service public de l’audiovisuel n’est pas uniquement lié à des contraintes techniques, mais essentiellement à des objectifs qualitatifs (contenu des émissions). Ainsi, la thèse plaide en faveur de la pérpetuité du service public de l’audiovisuel dans l’ère du numérique. Par ailleurs, des questions plus spécifiques (comme l’accès à la boucle locale, l’interconnexion des réseaux et la numérisation des infrastructures) ont été examinées.
Doctorat en droit
info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished
KREMMYDA, Peristera. « Between competitiveness and pluralism : concentration in the broadcasting industry in the EU ». Doctoral thesis, 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/4681.
Texte intégralExamining board: Prof. Giuliano Amato (Supervisor, European University Institute) ; Prof. Enzo Cheli (Presidente dell'Autorità per le Garanzie delle Comunicazioni) ; Prof. Petros Mavroidis (Columbia Law School and University of Neuchatel) ; Prof. Hanns Ullrich (European University Institute)
PDF of thesis uploaded from the Library digitised archive of EUI PhD theses completed between 2013 and 2017
HANRETTY, Chris. « The Political Independence of Public Service Broadcasters ». Doctoral thesis, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/13213.
Texte intégralExamining Board: Adrienne Héritier (EUI/RSCAS), Anker Brink Lund (Copenhagen Business School), Gianpietro Mazzoleni (University of Milan) (External Co-Supervisor), Alexander H. Trechsel (EUI) (Supervisor)
François Mény Prize for the Best Comparative Study of Political Institutions, 2010.
In this thesis, I demonstrate that the degree of political independence that a public service broadcaster has depends on the degree of legal protection given to it, and on the size of the market for news in that country. The latter affects broadcaster independence by creating more standardized and professionalized news, which in turn reduces politicians’ incentives to intervene in the broadcaster. The former affects broadcaster independence by making it less likely that such intervention will be effective. I demonstrate these claims in two ways. First, I conduct a large-N statistical analysis of 36 public service broadcasters (PSBs), in which I demonstrate that legal protection news market size are statistically significant predictors of PSB independence (as I operationalize it), and that other suggested explanatory factors — party system polarization and bureaucratic partisanship — have no effect. Second, I carry out a comparative historical analysis of six European PSBs—Radiotelevisione Italiana, Radiotelevisión Española, Radio Telefís Éireann (Ireland), the British Broadcasting Corporation, Danmarks Radio, and Sveriges Radio and its associated companies (Sweden) — and substantiate the claims made in my statistical analysis. In particular, I demonstrate that where the market for news was bigger, broadcasters capitalised on pre-existing journalistic experience, adopting the house-styles of press agencies and learning from journalists’ associations. Conversely, where the market was small, that experience could not be drawn on, and broadcast journalism attracted political intervention.
Version of thesis published as a book "HANRETTY, Chris, Public Broadcasting and Political Interference, Abingdon/New York, Routledge, 2011, Routledge Research in Political Communication"
ARINO, Monica. « Regulation and competition in European broadcasting : a study of pluralism through access ». Doctoral thesis, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/4544.
Texte intégralKOENIG, Michael E. D. « The introduction of digital television in Europe : new problems and implications for competition and media concentration ». Doctoral thesis, 1996. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/5518.
Texte intégralROTENBERG, Boris. « The legal regulation of communications bottlenecks in European digital television ; Boris Rotenberg ». Doctoral thesis, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/4769.
Texte intégralExamining board: Prof. Bruno De Witte (Supervisor, European University Institute) ; Prof. Rachael Craufurd Smith, University of Edinburgh ; Prof. Roberto Mastroianni, Università Federico II di Napoli ; Prof. Hans Ullrich, European University Institute
PDF of thesis uploaded from the Library digitised archive of EUI PhD theses completed between 2013 and 2017
IBÁÑEZ, COLOMO Pablo. « European communications law and technological convergence : deregulation, re-gulation and regulatory convergence in television and telecommunications ». Doctoral thesis, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/14521.
Texte intégralDefence Date: 10 June 2010
Examining Board: Prof. Heike Schweitzer - Supervisor, European University Institute; Prof. Antonio Bavasso - University College London; Prof. Bruno de Witte - Universiteit Maastricht; Prof. Paul Nihoul - Université Catholique de Louvain
PDF of thesis uploaded from the Library digital archive of EUI PhD theses
Technological convergence' is an expression depicting the blurring of boundaries between television and telecommunications. As a consequence of this process, the economic assumptions underlying legacy regulatory regimes no longer reflect market realities. Thus, technological convergence pushes for regulatory change, and this, in three directions: (i) deregulation, i.e. the removal of tools providing for exclusive and special rights; (ii) regulatory convergence, i.e. the creation of a level-playing-field between incumbents and new entrants and (iii) re-regulation, i.e. the introduction of new tools, either to replace legacy ones or to respond to emerging concerns. The first part of the dissertation examines the reaction to technological convergence in television and telecommunications regulation. While deregulation was unavoidable in both sectors, so pressing were technological developments, there are marked differences in other respects between them. Television regulation is an example of a 'defensive' reaction, in the sense that steps towards regulatory convergence and re-regulation have been slow and incremental. As a result, legislation is remarkably unstable and distortions, unavoidable. In addition, competition law has emerged as a source of regulation to deal with some concerns neglected in explicit regulatory regimes. In the telecommunications sector, by contrast, the Regulatory Framework for electronic communications constitutes an attempt to lay down, ex novo, a flexible and lasting regime. The second part examines choices around 'conflict points' between regimes, i.e. those areas of substantive overlap between the three sources of regulation identified above. Two conclusions follow from the analysis. First, it appears that one must differentiate, for normative purposes, between regulatory objectives (pluralism, effective competition, harmonisation...) and the specific tools through which these are implemented. In this sense, it seems feasible and justified to reconcile conflicting objectives across the value chain along the lines of tools that are more suited to apply in a changing environment. Secondly, it is noted that television and telecommunications activities are so inextricably linked that any attempt to regulate one of the two sectors in isolation from the other, as is currently the case, is artificial and unsustainable.
SALVATORE, Vincenzo. « Concorrenza televisiva e diritto comunitario ». Doctoral thesis, 1991. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/4776.
Texte intégralBANIA, Konstantina. « The role of media pluralism in the enforcement of EU competition law ». Doctoral thesis, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/37779.
Texte intégralExamining Board: Professor Giorgio Monti, Supervisor-European University Institute; Doctor Rachael Craufurd-Smith, University of Edinburg; Professor Michal Gal, University of Haifa; Professor Peggy Valcke, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Received the The Institute of Competition Law 2016 Concurrences PhD Award.
EU Competition Law is generally believed to play a negligible role in protecting media pluralism. Three arguments are usually put forward to support this position. First, the application of EU competition law ensures market access, thereby potentially delivering an outcome that is of benefit to media pluralism, but this outcome is entirely dependent on the economic concerns the European Commission attempts to address in each individual case and hence (at best) coincidental. Second, precisely because it is driven by efficiency considerations, EU competition law is incapable of grasping the qualitative dimension of media pluralism. Third, when exercising State aid control, the Commission can (and must) play only a marginal role in the planning and implementation of aid measures aimed at promoting media pluralism. This thesis puts forward the claim that EU competition law has potential that remains unexplored by questioning the accuracy of the above three assumptions. To test this claim, it examines a number of traditional and new media markets (broadcasting, print and digital publishing, online search, and news aggregation) and competition law issues (concentrations, resale price maintenance agreements, online agencies, abuses of dominance, and State aids to public service media). The study demonstrates that if relevant assessments are conducted properly, that is, by duly taking account of the dimensions that drive competition in the media, including quality, variety and originality, and by making appropriate use of the tools provided by the applicable legal framework, EU competition law may go a long way towards safeguarding media pluralism without the need to stretch the limits of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Amidst a deregulatory trend towards the media and given that the likelihood that action with far-reaching implications under other branches of EU law is low, the normative suggestions put forward in this thesis possibly form the only realistic proposal on the contribution the EU can make to the protection of pluralism.
Livres sur le sujet "Television broadcasting – European Union countries"
Moragas Spa, Miquel de, 1943- et Garitaonaindía Garnacho Carmelo, dir. Decentralization in the global era : Television in the regions, nationalities and small countries of the European Union. London : John Libby, 1995.
Trouver le texte intégralCommission of the European Communities., dir. Strategy options to strengthen the European programme industry in the context of the audiovisual policy of the European Union / $c European Commission. Luxembourg : European Commission, 1994.
Trouver le texte intégralThe European Union democratic deficit and the public sphere : An evaluation of EU media policy. Amsterdam : IOS Press, 2002.
Trouver le texte intégralVoss, Jörg Michael. Pluraler Rundfunk in Europa - ein duales System für Europa ? : Rahmenbedingungen für den öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunk in einer europäischen dualen Rundfunkordnung ; unter Berücksichtigung der Anforderungen der europäischen Meinungs- und Medienfreiheit. Frankfurt am Main : P. Lang, 2008.
Trouver le texte intégralHellwig, Irene. Rundfunkübertragungsrechte an den Olympischen Spielen im europäischen Kartellrecht : Medienmärkte, gemeinsamer Erwerb durch die European Broadcasting Union und Exklusivvergabe. Zürich : Schulthess, 2009.
Trouver le texte intégral1938-, Price Monroe Edwin, et Verhulst Stefaan, dir. Parental control of television broadcasting. Mahwah, N.J : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002.
Trouver le texte intégralCere, Rinella. European and national identities in Britain and Italy : Maastricht on television. Lewiston, N.Y : Edwin Mellen Press, 2000.
Trouver le texte intégralEurope's digital revolution : Broadcasting regulation, the EU and the nation state. London : Routledge, 2001.
Trouver le texte intégralSänger, Jessica. Mediale Verwertung von Sportveranstaltungen : Zivilrechtliche Grundlagen der Verwertung und kartellrechtliche Analyse der Einkaufsgemeinschaft der EBU. Frankfurt am Main : PL Academic Research, 2015.
Trouver le texte intégralSandberg, Karin. Unzulässiger Protektionismus in der europäischen Medienpolitik ? : Die Massnahmen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft zum Schutz des europäischen Films und die Vereinbarkeit mit dem durch das GATT und die WTO-Vereinbarungen gebildeten Rechtsrahmen. Frankfurt am Main : P. Lang, 1998.
Trouver le texte intégralChapitres de livres sur le sujet "Television broadcasting – European Union countries"
Michailidou, Asimina, Elisabeth Eike et Hans-Jörg Trenz. « Journalism, Truth and the Restoration of Trust in Democracy : Tracing the EU ‘Fake News’ Strategy ». Dans Europe in the Age of Post-Truth Politics, 53–75. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13694-8_4.
Texte intégralÇakır, Vedat, et Sibel Ozkan. « EU Media Policies in the Context of Media Pluralism and Turkey's Consistency ». Dans Handbook of Research on Social and Economic Development in the European Union, 500–509. IGI Global, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1188-6.ch029.
Texte intégralLittoz-Monnet, Annabelle. « The Communitarisation of broadcasting regulation : the ‘Television Without Frontiers’ Directive ». Dans The European Union and Culture, 71–98. Manchester University Press, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9780719074356.003.0004.
Texte intégralBajomi-Lazar, Peter, Vaclav Stetka et Miklós Sükösd. « Public Service Television in European Union Countries : ». Dans Trends in Communication Policy Research, 355–80. Intellect Books, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv36xvj36.21.
Texte intégralSyvertsen, Trine, et Gunn Enli. « Public Service in Europe : Five Key Points ». Dans A Future for Public Service Television. The MIT Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9781906897710.003.0010.
Texte intégralChochliouros, Ioannis, Anastasia S. Spiliopoulou et Stergios P. Chochliouros. « Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB) Evolution ». Dans Encyclopedia of Multimedia Technology and Networking, Second Edition, 391–401. IGI Global, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-014-1.ch053.
Texte intégralCarayannis, Elias G., et Christopher Ziemnowicz. « Information and Communication Technology-Enabled Economic Growth and Convergence ». Dans IT-Enabled Strategic Management, 295–319. IGI Global, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-908-3.ch014.
Texte intégral