Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « Soviet Union – Politics and government – 1936-1953 »
Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres
Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « Soviet Union – Politics and government – 1936-1953 ».
À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.
Articles de revues sur le sujet "Soviet Union – Politics and government – 1936-1953"
Stašulāne, Anita. « ESOTERICISM AND POLITICS : THEOSOPHY ». Via Latgalica, no 2 (31 décembre 2009) : 25. http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/latg2009.2.1604.
Texte intégralGopalakrishnan, R. « Afghanistan'S Foreign Policy : Patterns And Problems ». India Quarterly : A Journal of International Affairs 44, no 3-4 (juillet 1988) : 226–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/097492848804400303.
Texte intégralBoyko, Ihor. « LIFE PATH, SCIENTIFIC-PEDAGOGICAL AND PUBLIC ACTIVITY OF VOLODYMYR SOKURENKO (TO THE 100TH ANNIVERSARY OF HIS BIRTH) ». Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series Law 72, no 72 (20 juin 2021) : 158–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/vla.2021.72.158.
Texte intégralZaytsev, Aleksandr V. « Yugoslavia on the pages of the journal Slavyane (1942–1958) ». Slavic Almanac, no 1-2 (2021) : 100–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.31168/2073-5731.2021.1-2.1.06.
Texte intégralPedemonte, Rafael. « A Case of “New Soviet Internationalism” : Relations between the USSR and Chile's Christian Democratic Government, 1964–1970 ». Journal of Cold War Studies 21, no 3 (août 2019) : 4–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jcws_a_00894.
Texte intégralSukhonos, V. V. « THE SOVIET MODEL OF LOCAL GOVERNANCE OF THE FATE OF THE NEW ECONOMIC POLICY : THE POLITICAL AND LEGAL ASPECTS ». Legal horizons, no 18 (2019) : 20–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.21272/legalhorizons.2019.i18.p20.
Texte intégralAltymyshova, Zuhra. « October Revolution and Soviet Class Struggle Policy in Kyrgyzstan ». Central Asia 81, Winter (30 juin 2018) : 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.54418/ca-81.100.
Texte intégralBurdina, Daria Aleksandrovna. « Solving the Problems of Childhood Neglect and Homelessness through the social Policy of the USSR 1936-1953 (based on the materials of the Baikal region) ». Исторический журнал : научные исследования, no 4 (avril 2022) : 39–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.7256/2454-0609.2022.4.38570.
Texte intégralKulavig, Erik. « Jeremy Smith and Melanie Ilic, eds., Khrushchev in the Kremlin : Policy and Government in the Soviet Union 1953–1964. London : Routledge, 2011. 249 pp. $150.00 ». Journal of Cold War Studies 15, no 1 (janvier 2013) : 178–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jcws_r_00327.
Texte intégralIlmjarv, Magnus. « Estonian, Latvian and Lithuanian Communists in the Transnational World of the Comintern before the Great Purge ». ISTORIYA 12, no 11 (109) (2021) : 0. http://dx.doi.org/10.18254/s207987840017636-8.
Texte intégralThèses sur le sujet "Soviet Union – Politics and government – 1936-1953"
McIvor, Morag Catriona. « Soviet policy towards the new territories of the RSFSR, circa 1939 to 1953 ». Thesis, University of Cambridge, 2012. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.610572.
Texte intégralBruyneel, Stephen Alan. « The future of Soviet domestic reform : an analysis of three sovietologists' views ». Thesis, University of British Columbia, 1988. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/28587.
Texte intégralArts, Faculty of
Political Science, Department of
Graduate
Bennett, Jeffrey D. « Rising to the occasion : the changing role of the KGB and its influence in Soviet succession struggles 1953-1991 ». Thesis, McGill University, 1995. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=23324.
Texte intégralZrudlo, Laurie. « Soviet foreign policy responsiveness to the external environment : Soviet-Indian relations 1968-1985 ». Thesis, McGill University, 1987. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=66111.
Texte intégralSeward, James W. « The German exile journal Das Wort and the Soviet Union ». PDXScholar, 1990. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds/4104.
Texte intégralRofi'i, Imam. « Soviet anti-religious policies and the Muslims of Central Asia, 1917-1938 ». Thesis, McGill University, 1994. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=26320.
Texte intégralVercauteren, Pierre. « Des politiques européennes à l'égard de l'URSS : la France, la RFA et la Grande-Bretagne de 1969 à 1989 ». Doctoral thesis, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, 1998. http://hdl.handle.net/2013/ULB-DIPOT:oai:dipot.ulb.ac.be:2013/211974.
Texte intégralDura, Kornel B. « Internal determinants of foreign policy domestic politics and foreign policy in the Soviet Union and the United States, 1945-1948 ». 1995. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/2537.
Texte intégral« Aanpassings deur Yuri Vladimirovich Andropov in die USSR voor en tydens sy bewind as Sekretaris-Generaal, 1982-1984 ». Thesis, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/10210/15113.
Texte intégralIn 1985 the world took renewed interest in the Soviet Union with the ascendency of its dynamic new leader Mikhail Gorbachev. His policies of glasnost and perestroika made an unprecedented impact within the Soviet Union and the Western world. As a result of all the attention Gorbachev's restructuring received, and the subsequent drama and disintegration of the Yeltsin "take-over", interest in the two leaders who preceded Gorbachev, i.e. Yuri Andropov and Konstantin Chernenko, waned considerably. Andropov and Chernenko, together with Brezhnev, were often perceived as a trio of ineffectual old men, endeavouring to keep together a tottering Soviet system. While this perception may be appropriate to Brezhnev in the latter decade of his rule, and to a lesser extent to Chernenko, it is not a justified evaluation of Yuri Andropov's leadership. While he came from the same dispensation and was a contemporary of theirs, he set out with determination and dedication to bring new life into the fossilized system he inherited from Brezhnev. Andropov was a highly intelligent and competent person who had a long and varied political career behind him when he became Secretary General. He had been a member of the CPSU for more than four decades and during this time he served as Komosomol leader, Ambassador, Secretary, Chief Ideologist and headed the KGB for 15 years. In each of these capacities he strived for excellence and conducted himself with integrity. (Dissidents who had dealings with him during his period in the KGB may be of a different opinion, however.) When Andropov took over from Brezhnev, the Soviet system did not correspond to his ideals of Socialism. Over the decades and especially during the last stagnant years of Brezhnev's rule, corruption had become rife in the Soviet Union and it appeared to be entrenched in every aspect of Soviet life. The situation was aggravated by the gigantic bureaucracy which was not in favour of change as it was well-entrenched and elitist. Resistance to change had had a paralyzing effect on all previous endeavours. However daunting the task seemed to be, Andropov set about fighting corruption on every level. Corruption went against the grain of his puritan personality and even more importantly, against his perception of the ideal Socialist system. It was often alleged that Andropov's anti-corruption campaign was merely a mechanism with which to eliminate opponents and attain power. There is some truth in this, but it was not his primary reason for trying to eradicate corruption. He did achieve power through eliminating corrupt officials, but even when he had reached the ultimate position, a sound administration remained a priority for him. Indeed, the fact that he was not selective in this process reflects his determination in this regard. Even very high officials, persons within the Kremlin and members of the Brezhnev family itself were not spared. He not only fought corruption but strived to upgrade social, and labour discipline in the Soviet system. A strict disciplinarian himself, he saw many of the negative aspects within the system reflected in the lives and attitudes of the Soviet citizens. This led him to try to install discipline as a way of life and he stressed a high work ethic. However,Andropov must not be perceived one-dimensionally as the ex-KGB chief using police methods on a civilian population. His chief priority in his internal policy was to rectify and improve the declining Soviet economy. The gross corruption that existed had a negative effect on the economy, so eradicating corruption was a prerequisite for economic recovery. As a staunch Marxist-Leninist, he believed that any economic reforms had to be brought about within the strict framework of Socialist principles. He never queried the validity or superiority of the Socialist system and he ascribed the economic ills not to the system itself but to the way it was functioning. He never deviated from Socialist principles and indeed repeatedly warned against the dangers of bringing about changes alien to the nature of Socialism. He was in favour of the centrally planned system but not of the rigidity and corruption that had become part of it. His ideal was for greater flexibility and greater participation with more input from worker, manager and minister. He believed each individual should take full responsibility for the aspect of production or service he was involved in. Only if the total creative force of the masses could be released could the system function as it was originally intended to. The pillars on which this could be achieved were greater democratization and decentralization.
Wachtmann, Jenna Lee. « Democracy aid in post-communist Russia : case studies of the Ford Foundation, the C.S. Mott Foundation, and the National Endowment for Democracy ». Thesis, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/1805/7927.
Texte intégralThe collapse of communism and the fall of the Soviet Union offered an unprecedented opportunity for the international community to support transitions to democracy in a region that had long known only totalitarian rule. Among the key players engaged in supporting efforts were U.S. grantmaking institutions, including both non-state and quasi-state aid providers. This thesis explores the motivations and evolving strategies of three different types of grantmaking institutions in a single country, Russia, with a particular focus on democracy aid provision from 1988-2002. The three types of grantmaking organizations examined through case studies include: the Ford Foundation, a private foundation with a history of international grantmaking spanning several decades; the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, a private foundation known primarily for its domestic focus with a much shorter history of international grantmaking; and, finally, the National Endowment for Democracy, a U.S. government-created and heavily taxpayer-funded organization established as a private nonprofit organization to make grants specifically for democracy promotion. Motivating factors for initiating or expanding grantmaking in Russia in the late 1980s included a previous history of grantmaking in the region, a previously established institutional commitment to democracy promotion, international peace and security concerns, and interest from a top institutional leader. Over the course of the fourteen year period studied, five grantmaking features are identified as influencing the development of grantmaking strategies: professional grantmaking staff; organizational habit; global political, social, and economic environments; market and other funding source influences; and physical presence. Though subject to constraints, the non-state and quasi-state grantmaking institutions included in this study were able to avoid weaknesses identified with private philanthropy in other research and demonstrated a willingness to experiment and take risks, an ability to operate at the non-governmental level, and a commitment to long-term grantmaking, informed by expertise.
Livres sur le sujet "Soviet Union – Politics and government – 1936-1953"
Lee, Stephen J. Stalin and the Soviet Union. London : Routledge, 1999.
Trouver le texte intégralRobert, Conquest. Inside Stalin's secret police : NKVD politics, 1936-1939. Stanford, Calif : Hoover Institution Press, Stanford University, 1985.
Trouver le texte intégralSebag-Montefiore, Simon. Stalin : 1839-1953. London : Phoenix, 2004.
Trouver le texte intégralParrish, Michael. The lesser terror : Soviet state security, 1939-1953. Westport, Conn : Praeger, 1996.
Trouver le texte intégralRobert, Conquest. Inside Stalin's secret police : NKVD politics, 1936-1939. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire : Macmillan, 1985.
Trouver le texte intégralBrudny, Yitzhak M. Reinventing Russia : Russian nationalism and the Soviet state, 1953-1991. Cambridge, Mass : Harvard University Press, 1998.
Trouver le texte intégralIlič, Melanie. Khrushchev in the Kremlin : Policy and government in the Soviet Union, 1953-1964. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon : Routledge, 2011.
Trouver le texte intégralKhrushchev in the Kremlin : Policy and government in the Soviet Union, 1953-1964. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon : Routledge, 2011.
Trouver le texte intégralG, Smith Michael. Language and power in the creation of the USSR, 1917-1953. Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter, 1998.
Trouver le texte intégralThe Khrushchev era, 1953-1964. London : Longman House, 1995.
Trouver le texte intégralChapitres de livres sur le sujet "Soviet Union – Politics and government – 1936-1953"
Ruggenthaler, Peter. « Germany and the Soviet Union during the Cold War Era ». Dans The Oxford Handbook of German Politics, 82—C6.P126. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198817307.013.7.
Texte intégral