Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « Solicited rating »

This paper analyzes the extent to which selection explains the observed discrepancy between solicited and unsolicited ratings. I propose a model of selection with truth telling rating agencies and borrowers with the ability to veto the revelation of the rating. The observed difference between the two categories of ratings in different sectors is in line with the prediction of the model. In the sovereign market there is a positive selection of borrowers into unsolicited ratings whereas other sectors have, on the contrary, lower unsolicited rating grades than those solicited.

Previous studies show that the unsolicited ratings of S&P and Fitch are lower than the solicited ratings assigned by these two agencies. The unsolicited ratings of S&P and Fitch are based on publicly available information for a firm. However, no previous study has examined the unsolicited ratings of Moody's because Moody's does not disclose whether its ratings are solicited or unsolicited. Using Moody's solicited and unsolicited ratings collected from a survey of Japanese firms, we find that unsolicited credit ratings are still lower than solicited ratings even though firms with unsolicited ratings provide Moody's with some degree of inside information. We also compare the unsolicited ratings of S&P with those of Moody's and find that Moody's ratings are no different than those assigned by S&P although S&P's unsolicited ratings are based on public information. Therefore, we conclude that, regardless of the rating agency, unsolicited ratings are lower than solicited ratings because firms with unsolicited ratings provide incomplete private information to rating agencies.

Current and prospective students (n =133) were surveyed about their preferences for a name for a new online series of courses to be launched by a university. Preferences for each of five names were solicited by means of analytical ratings, holistic ratings, and rankings. All three techniques were employed to assure that the most appropriate name for the program was selected, but this also afforded us the opportunity to study several theoretical issues: (a) Do the different methods lead to discrepant decisions at the aggregate level? (b) Is the holistic rating or the analytical rating approach more closely related to the rankings? (c) To what extent is lack of agreement between ratings and rankings due to lack of differentiation in ratings? The authors find that at the aggregate level all three methods suggest the same name for the program; the holistic rating is slightly more highly correlated with the ranking; and the lack of differentiation in ratings is one reason producing inconsistencies between ratings and rankings.

Costly signaling theory was developed in both economics and biology and has been used to explain a wide range of phenomena. However, the theory’s prediction that signal cost can enforce information quality in the design of new communication systems has never been put to an empirical test. Here we show that imposing time costs on reporting extreme scores can improve crowd wisdom in a previously cost-free rating system. We developed an online game where individuals interacted repeatedly with simulated services and rated them for satisfaction. We associated ratings with differential time costs by endowing the graphical user interface that solicited ratings from the users with “physics,” including an initial (default) slider position and friction. When ratings were not associated with differential cost (all scores from 0 to 100 could be given by an equally low-cost click on the screen), scores correlated only weakly with objective service quality. However, introducing differential time costs, proportional to the deviation from the mean score, improved correlations between subjective rating scores and objective service performance and lowered the sample size required for obtaining reliable, averaged crowd estimates. Boosting time costs for reporting extreme scores further facilitated the detection of top performances. Thus, human collective online behavior, which is typically cost-free, can be made more informative by applying costly signaling via the virtual physics of rating devices.

Business school rankings are “big business”, influencing donors and potential students alike, holding much sway over decanal and faculty priorities, particularly with respect to the curriculum as well as the focus and destination of research publications (i.e., in so-called “top” journals). Over the past several years, the perverse effects of these priorities have begun to be acknowledged, and new ratings and ranking systems have emerged. One promising newcomer is the Positive Impact Rating (PIR), which uniquely and exclusively focuses on student perceptions of their business school’s priorities and the learning experience. In addition, it organizes schools by tier, in an effort to foster collaboration and continuous improvement, as opposed to ranked competition. If this new approach is to achieve its stated objective and help shift the focus of business schools to developing future business leaders and research output in alignment with a more sustainable world (and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals), it is essential that the metrics used be and be perceived as both valid and reliable. The current research aims to make a contribution in this regard, analyzing the results at one business school in detail and making recommendations for strengthening these aims. Results show that the parametric properties of the survey are highly interrelated, suggesting that the predictive utility of the separate elements within the scale could be improved. Additionally, biases in scores may exist depending on where the responses are collected and who solicited them, as well as the students’ perception of their overall academic experience and on socio-cultural factors.

The purpose of this study was to develop a valid and reliable rubric to be used for the evaluation of large ensemble wind band performances. The guiding questions for this study were: (a) what are the psychometric qualities (i.e., reliability and validity) of the scale developed to assess wind band ensemble performance at the high school level? (b) how do the items fit the model and vary in difficulty? (c) how does the structure of the rating scale vary across individual items? and (d) how can the rating scale be transferred into an informative rubric? The primary data analysis tool used in this study was the Multifaceted Rasch Partial Credit Measurement Model. Music content experts ( N = 20) were solicited to evaluate 40 wind band performances, each evaluator listening to four. A 4-point Likert-type rating scale (e.g., Strongly Agree, Agree, Disagree, and Strongly Disagree) was used to evaluate each recorded performance. Results indicated good model data fit and resulted in a final rubric containing 24 items ranging from two to four performance categories. Implications for classroom teaching and consequential validity are discussed.

AbstractThis paper extends previous research showing that experienced difficulty of recall can influence evaluative judgments (e.g., Winkielman & Schwarz, 2001) to a field study of university students rating a course. Students completed a mid-course evaluation form in which they were asked to list either 2 ways in which the course could be improved (a relatively easy task) or 10 ways in which the course could be improved (a relatively difficult task). Respondents who had been asked for 10 critical comments subsequently rated the course more favorably than respondents who had been asked for 2 critical comments. An internal analysis suggests that the number of critiques solicited provides a frame against which accessibility of instances is evaluated. The paper concludes with a discussion of implications of the present results and possible directions for future research.

This article studies the cognitions of (a) parents of children with dyslexia and (b) school career counsellors about possible career choices for dyslexic children, by comparing their evaluations of occupational competence (EOCs) for dyslexic children, to those for children without dyslexia. For dyslexic children, 116 participants rated the suitability of 28 occupations, varying according to the required level of written-language use. For children without dyslexia, the same participants rated these same occupations according to if they estimated it might be a “good” occupational choice or not. Participants were free to take into account different criteria often used when considering a job (employability, remuneration, prestige, job security, career prospects). By the aforementioned differentiation of terms used (i.e. suitability vs “goodness”), it was indirectly solicited from the participants to also consider the impairment in their judgement. The results showed that occupations requiring high written-language skills were evaluated as “good” for children without dyslexia but less suitable for children with dyslexia. The exact opposite trend was observed for occupations having lower such requirements. Another noteworthy result is the discrepancy between the ratings obtained from counsellors and those from parents: while both groups provided similar ratings for children without dyslexia, substantial differences were recorded when rating the suitability of these same jobs for dyslexic children. This different pattern of cognitions is discussed herein, and their connection with parental expectations and aspirations is analysed, while contrasted with shifts due to counsellors’ stereotypical views.

Introduction: This study aimed to examine the perception of faculty on the relevance, feasibility and comprehensiveness of the Professionalism Mini Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) in the assessment of medical professionalism in residency programmes in an Asian postgraduate training centre. Methods: Cross-sectional survey data was collected from faculty in 33 residency programmes. Items were deemed to be relevant to assessment of medical professionalism when at least 80% of the faculty gave a rating of ≥8 on a 0-10 numerical rating scale (0 representing not relevant, 10 representing very relevant). Feedback regarding the feasibility and comprehensiveness of the P-MEX assessment was also collected from the faculty through open-ended questions. Results: In total, 555 faculty from 33 residency programmes participated in the survey. Of the 21 items in the P-MEX, 17 items were deemed to be relevant. For the remaining four items ‘maintained appropriate appearance’, ‘extended his/herself to meet patient needs’, ‘solicited feedback’, and ‘advocated on behalf of a patient’, the percentage of faculty who gave a rating of ≥8 was 78%, 75%, 74%, and 69% respectively. Of the 333 respondents to the open-ended question on feasibility, 34% (n=113) felt that there were too many questions in the P-MEX. Faculty also reported that assessments about ‘collegiality’ and ‘communication with empathy’ were missing in the current P-MEX. Conclusion: The P-MEX is relevant and feasible for assessment of medical professionalism. There may be a need for greater emphasis on the assessment of collegiality and empathetic communication in the P-MEX.

BackgroundA proper understanding of patterns of care represents a crucial step in improving clinical decision making and enhancing service provision. Only a few studies, however, have explored global patterns of psychiatric admissions nationwide, and none have been undertaken in Italy.MethodSociodemographic, clinical and treatment-related information was collected for 1577 patients admitted to 130 public and 36 private in-patient facilities in Italy during an index period in the year 2004. All patients were also rated using the 24-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Personal and Social Performance (PSP) rating scales.ResultsNon-affective psychoses (36%) were the most common diagnoses and accounted to a large extent for compulsory admissions. Private facilities were more likely to admit patients with organic mental disorders and substance abuse/dependence and less likely to admit patients with non-affective psychoses. Overall, 77.8% of patients had been receiving treatment by a mental health professional in the month prior to admission. In 54% of cases, the admission was solicited by patients' family members. The main factors preceding admission were impairment in work or social functioning, social withdrawal, and conflict with family members. Agitation, delusions and/or hallucinations, and the presence of multiple problems were associated with compulsory admissions, whereas depressive and anxiety symptoms were associated with voluntary admissions.ConclusionsIn a mixed, public–private psychiatric care system, like the Italian one, public and private facilities admit patients with widely different clinical characteristics and needs. Family support represents an important resource for most patients, and interventions specifically addressed to relieving family burden are warranted.

2007/2008
Intermediari creditizi ed agenzie di credit rating svolgono un ruolo decisivo nell’attenuare gli effetti distorsivi della distribuzione asimmetrica delle informazioni cui sono intrinsecamente soggette le transazioni che si pongono in essere tra datori e prenditori di fondi, i quali soli hanno piena conoscenza del proprio, effettivo, merito di credito. In particolare, nel mercato creditizio, le banche, interponendosi tra soggetti in surplus e soggetti in deficit, si sostituiscono agli investitori nel selezionare le alternative di finanziamento, svolgendo per essi il processo di raccolta, di analisi, e di elaborazione delle informazioni relative alla capacità di credito delle possibili controparti, favorendo in ultimo la riduzione dei costi di transazione e di gestione delle informazioni. Analogamente, nel mercato obbligazionario, ove unità in surplus ed unità in deficit si interfacciano in modo diretto, le agenzie di rating si interpongono tra investitori ed emittenti di strumenti di debito, assumendo tuttavia il differente ruolo di “brokers informativi”, ovvero di operatori specializzati nella raccolta e nell’elaborazione delle informazioni circa lo standing creditizio dell’emittente, e nella successiva sintesi e divulgazione delle stesse attraverso un giudizio espresso da un simbolo alfabetico, il credit rating, in grado di comunicare in modo semplice ed immediato agli investitori l’opinione dell’agenzia circa l’idoneità dell’emittente di provvedere in modo esatto e puntuale sia al rimborso del capitale, sia al pagamento degli interessi relativi ad una o più emissioni di debito. Invero, a nostro avviso, è ragionevole ritenere che la reale portata del ruolo assolto da intermediari creditizi ed agenzie di rating nel contrastare le asimmetrie informative tra datori e prenditori di fondi, e l’effettiva efficacia del loro intervento nel promuovere l’efficienza del mercato creditizio ed obbligazionario possano dipendere dalla natura delle informazioni che tali soggetti scelgono di porre a fondamento delle valutazioni relative al merito di credito dei potenziali soggetti finanziati. A tal riguardo è possibile operare una distinzione, seppur non strettamente dicotomica, tra elementi informativi di natura “hard”- i quali tipicamente si presentano in forma quantitativa, e prestandosi a facile codificazione, consentono di essere raccolti in modo impersonale ed interpretati in modo oggettivo ed univoco - ed informazioni di tipo “soft” - che, al contrario, presentandosi in forma prettamente qualitativa/descrittiva ed essendo subordinate ad interpretazione soggettiva da parte del valutatore, sono connotate da un’intrinseca difficoltà di codificazione, e impongono modalità di acquisizione di tipo personale e diretto. Alla luce dei descritti aspetti di differenziazione, il prevalente ricorso ad informazioni di natura hard, se da un lato determina significativi vantaggi in termini di costo di acquisizione ed elaborazione dell’informazione stessa, dall’altro comporta l’inevitabile perdita del patrimonio informativo che solo input di tipo soft sono in grado di veicolare. In tale quadro si inserisce il presente lavoro, finalizzato ad analizzare la variegata morfologia dell’informazione e ad esaminare nello specifico in quale forma (hard o soft) predominante si presentino le informazioni poste alla base dei processi di analisi del merito di credito svolti da intermediari creditizi e agenzie di rating. Ciò equivale ad indagare come tali soggetti scelgano di posizionarsi rispetto al trade-off esistente tra i costi connessi al trattamento dell’informazione - i quali risultano minimizzati in funzione di un crescente utilizzo di hard information - ed il grado di completezza dell’informazione stessa - che si accresce in funzione dell’inclusione di soft information nella base informativa a disposizione del valutatore - dal quale, come anticipato, riteniamo possa dipendere l’efficace riduzione delle asimmetrie informative esistenti tra datori e prenditori di fondi. A tale proposito si osserva come l’utilizzo più o meno intenso di informazioni di natura soft rispetto ad informazioni di carattere hard nell’ambito dei procedimenti valutativi condotti rispettivamente dalle banche e dalle agenzie di rating sia legato al contesto in cui tali processi di analisi sono originati. In particolare, con riferimento alle istituzioni bancarie, è possibile istituire un raffronto tra analisi del merito creditizio condotte nell’ambito di approcci al credito basati alternativamente sulla relazione (relationship lending) o sulla transazione (transactional lending), mentre, per quanto concerne le agenzie di rating, si individua una distinzione tra valutazioni svolte nell’ambito del processo di attribuzione del rating alternativamente sollecitato (solicited) o non sollecitato (unsolicited). La relazione che si instaura tra il soggetto valutatore e l’impresa oggetto di analisi nell’ambito del relationship lending - nel caso della banca - o nell’ambito del processo di attribuzione del rating sollecitato - nel caso dell’agenzia di rating - determina infatti un significativo arricchimento del set di input informativi disponibili per la valutazione, in quanto, oltre a consentire l’acquisizione di un complesso di elementi che, pur essendo codificabili e prestandosi ad interpretazione oggettiva (e, dunque, pur presentando carattere hard), non risultano desumibili da fonti pubbliche per questioni di riservatezza o di opacità informativa dell’impresa, permette di raccogliere una serie di informazioni impossibili da acquisire in forma impersonale alla luce della loro natura prettamente soft, che le rende non codificabili e misurabili esclusivamente attraverso il giudizio e la percezione individuale del medesimo soggetto preposto alla raccolta delle stesse. In ciò risiede, a nostro avviso, il valore aggiunto del contributo offerto da intermediari creditizi ed agenzie di rating alla riduzione delle asimmetrie informative tra datori e prenditori di fondi: anche prescindendo dalle condizioni di maggiore o minore trasparenza della controparte oggetto di analisi, l’inclusione della soft information alla base delle valutazioni condotte da tali soggetti - che risulta preclusa nel contesto tanto del rapporto di finanziamento transaction-based posto in essere dalla banca, quanto dell’attribuzione di un giudizio di rating non sollecitato da parte dell’agenzia - costituisce la determinante ultima dell’effettiva efficacia del loro intervento nel promuovere l’efficienza del mercato. Alla luce di tali considerazioni, la trattazione viene completata attraverso l’esame dell’impianto di analisi e valutazione delle informazioni qualitative sviluppato ed implementato presso un’agenzia di rating italiana, al fine di comprendere con quali strumenti, nel concreto, una credit rating agency possa affrontare il problema dell’elaborazione di informazioni soft - che si presenta con massima intensità nell’ambito del processo di assegnazione del rating di tipo solicited - pervenendo ad un bilanciamento ottimale del trade-off tra il costo di trattamento dell’informazione ed il grado di completezza della stessa.
XXI Ciclo
1979

碩士
國立東華大學
財務金融學系
101
After the financial crisis, public has brought renewed attention to conflicts of interest in credit rating agencies (CRAs). This paper examines the credit ratings of payment relationship between CRAs and issuers whether affects the bank’s leverage levels decisions in the ex-ante and ex-post. I found that unsolicited banks near a credit rating upgrade or downgrade issue less debt than solicited banks in the ex-ante results. However, I found that both two types of bank credit rating have opposite of result in the ex-post. The subsequent leverage decisions of unsolicited (solicited) banks would less (more) issue debt when they were downgraded (upgraded) in previous year.

This is a book about artistic modernism contending with the historical transfigurations of modernity. As a conscientious engagement with modernity’s restructuring of the lifeworld, the modernist avant-garde raised the stakes of this engagement to programmatic explicitness. But even beyond the vanguard, the global phenomenon of jazz combined somatic assault with sensory tutelage. Jazz, like the new technologies of modernity, recalibrated sensory ratios. The criterion of the new as self-making also extended to names: pseudonyms and heteronyms. The protocols of modernism solicited a pragmatic arousal of bodily sensation as artistic resource, validating an acrobatic sensibility ranging from slapstick and laughter to the pathos of bereavement. Expressivity trumped representation. The artwork was a diagram of perception, not a mimetic rendering. For artists, the historical pressures of altered perception provoked new models, and Ezra Pound’s slogan “Make It New” became the generic rallying cry of renovation. The paradigmatic stance of the avant-garde was established by Futurism, but the discovery of prehistoric art added another provocation to artists. Paleolithic caves validated the spirit of all-over composition, unframed and dynamic. Geometric abstraction, Constructivism and Purism, and Surrealism were all in quest of a new mythology. “Making it new” yielded a new pathos in the sensation of radical discrepancy between futurist striving and remotest antiquity. The Paleolithic cave and the USSR emitted comparable siren calls on behalf of the remote past and the desired future. As such, the present was suffused with the pathos of being neither, but subject to both.

Current and prospective students (n =133) were surveyed about their preferences for a name for a new online series of courses to be launched by a university. Preferences for each of five names were solicited by means of analytical ratings, holistic ratings, and rankings. All three techniques were employed to assure that the most appropriate name for the program was selected, but this also afforded us the opportunity to study several theoretical issues: (a) Do the different methods lead to discrepant decisions at the aggregate level? (b) Is the holistic rating or the analytical rating approach more closely related to the rankings? (c) To what extent is lack of agreement between ratings and rankings due to lack of differentiation in ratings? The authors find that at the aggregate level all three methods suggest the same name for the program; the holistic rating is slightly more highly correlated with the ranking; and the lack of differentiation in ratings is one reason producing inconsistencies between ratings and rankings.

Evaluating clinician satisfaction with an electronic medical record (EMR) system is an important dimension to overall acceptance and use, yet project managers often lack the time and resources to formally assess user satisfaction and solicit feedback. This article describes the methods used to assess clinician satisfaction with an EMR and identify opportunities for improving its use at a 300-physician academic practice setting. We administered an online survey to physicians and nurses; 244 (44%) responded. We compared physician and nurse mean ratings across 5 domains, and found physicians satisfactions scores were statistically lower than nurses in several areas (p

Period: 1962–1967. At infancy, SIN struggles. When Fouce Sr., suddenly dies, Azcárraga names Anselmo as SIN’s head. Frank Fouce Jr. inherits part ownership, but he opposes Anselmo’s appointment. Azcárraga, though, is firm on backing Anselmo. Fouce Jr. withdraws from SIN’s affairs. Anselmo triumphs with the launch of KMEX in Los Angeles. At SIN’s San Antonio hub, Nicolás perfects a “bicycle network” that feeds SIN to its first stations along the Mexican border. Danny Villanueva, a charismatic star NFL player, joins KMEX, giving SIN credibility. However, lacking Spanish-language audience ratings, Anselmo fails to solicit sponsors. He cannot pay fees SIN owes Telesistema. SIN is in debt and near bankruptcy. In Mexico City, Azcárraga’s son, Emilio Azcárraga Milmo, campaigns for the termination of SIN. The Telesistema board concurs that the U.S. venture must cease. But SIN is saved when the elder Azcárraga secrets a scheme by which his personal funds pay SIN’s expenses.

Abstract Literary uplift has tended to be associated with the sentimental view of literature as a resource of amelioration, consolation, or introspective repair. But contemporary writers are facilitating a somewhat different critical story about emotional stakes, formal variety, and political implications of literature that both conjures and contests uplift. Moving from fiction to memoir, from “Up Lit” to pathography, this chapter examines a range of twenty-first-century genres that repurpose the representation of ameliorative structures of feeling and that compel in turn a reconsideration of how professional criticism might accommodate affirmative affects. However, what would it mean to read for uplift in a literary work that is itself dark, a work that’s more ostensibly concerned with irremediable catastrophe than exemplary care, and whose devastating traumas would appear not only to solicit but to ratify negativity as criticism’s most condonable focus, thereby confirming D. J. Moores’s suspicion that “the concern for well-being manifests” in literary scholarship invariably “as a preoccupation with its absence”? Opting for something of a limit-case for this metacritical deliberation, the chapter considers Rebecca Loncraine’s Skybound, a posthumous 2018 memoir about her attempt to navigate the aftermath of breast cancer through an impulsive desire to learn how to fly gliders. What Loncraine shares with the otherwise distinct writers in this chapter is a concern with an aesthetic ecology of fraught amelioration, one that produces episodes of sentimental recess that refuse to slot into the parameters of what criticism typically finds politically useful when operating within the remits of eagle-eyed inquisition.

Following some experiences of bending stiffeners fatigue failures during full scale tests performed at Flexi France on flexible pipe and stiffener assemblies, Technip decided to launch in 1999 a major research program on fatigue life analysis of bending stiffeners made of Polyurethane material. This fatigue life assessment is now systematically performed by Technip for all new design of flexible riser bending stiffeners. This totally innovative method comprises a number of features as follows: Firstly fatigue behaviour of polyurethane material is described. The theoretical background, based on effective strain intensity factor, is detailed, together with experimental results on laboratory notched samples, solicited under strain control for various strain ratios, to obtain fatigue data. These fatigue data are well fitted by a power law defining the total number of cycles at break as a function of the effective strain intensity factor. The notion of fatigue threshold, below which no propagation is observed, is also demonstrated. Secondly the design used by Technip for its bending stiffeners, and most of all the critical areas regarding fatigue for these massive polyurethane structures are presented. Thirdly the methodology for fatigue life assessment of bending stiffeners in the critical areas defined above is discussed. Calibration of the strain calculation principle is presented versus finite element analysis. Based on all fatigue test results, the size of the equivalent notch to be considered at design stage, in the same critical areas, is discussed. Finally, a comprehensive calibration of the methodology according to full and middle scale test results is presented. The present paper is therefore a step forward in the knowledge of fatigue behaviour of massive polyurethane bending stiffener structures, which are critical items for flexible risers integrity, and widely used in the offshore industry. The confidence in bending stiffeners reliability is greatly enhanced by the introduction of this innovative methodology developed by Technip.

INCEFA-PLUS stands for INcreasing safety in nuclear power plants by Covering gaps in Environmental Fatigue Assessment. It is a five year project supported by the European Commission HORIZON2020 program that commenced in mid-2015 and in which sixteen organizations from across Europe participate. Specifically, the effects of mean strain/stress, hold time, strain amplitude and surface finish on fatigue life of austenitic stainless steels in light water reactor environments are being studied, these being issues of common interest to all participants. The project will develop proposals for improvements to methods for environmental fatigue assessment of nuclear plant components. Therefore, extensive testing capacity is being solicited in various laboratories across Europe in order to add to the existing amount of published data on environmentally assisted fatigue. Since there currently is no standard on environmental fatigue testing, it was imperative to come up with and agree upon a testing procedure within the consortium to minimize lab-to-lab variations in test results. This was done prior to the first phase of testing, but an update of the procedure was required after review of initial results, when additional potential lab-to-lab differences were identified. The current status of the so-called test protocol, and the key areas of difference found between different testing facilities, will be discussed. Due to the large test matrix within INCEFA-PLUS, distributed amongst various test laboratories, it has been necessary to develop a method to assign a data quality level to each test result, and a minimum data quality requirement for results that will be included in the project’s datasets used for analysis. Furthermore, the project has triggered international interest in facilitating mutual data access, and this requires data is gathered in a common database with data quality ratings applied. Ways to address the evaluation of data quality will be discussed. In a way, both activities, on a test protocol and on data review, jointly contribute to data quality by, respectively, ensuring a pre-test, common test procedure and a post-test, harmonized data evaluation. The large number of participants in the INCEFA-PLUS project presents a unique opportunity to gain consensus on light water reactor environment fatigue testing procedures and data quality assessment from experts working in a range of different organizations. The test protocol and data quality ratings developed within the INCEFA-PLUS project could be adopted by other organizations, or possibly used as the basis for future testing standards documents to harmonize approaches across the nuclear industry.