Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « Social evaluations »
Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres
Sommaire
Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « Social evaluations ».
À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.
Articles de revues sur le sujet "Social evaluations"
Barnett, Michael L., Michael Andreas Etter, Timothy Hannigan, Rhonda K. Reger et Anastasiya A. Zavyalova. « Social Media and Social Evaluations ». Academy of Management Proceedings 2019, no 1 (1 août 2019) : 13845. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2019.13845symposium.
Texte intégralSvensson, Kate, Barbara Szijarto, Peter Milley et J. Bradley Cousins. « Evaluating Social Innovations ». American Journal of Evaluation 39, no 4 (29 avril 2018) : 459–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098214018763553.
Texte intégralNørholm, Morten. « Outlining a theory of the social and symbolic function of evaluations of education ». Praxeologi – Et kritisk refleksivt blikk på sosiale praktikker 1 (21 mai 2019) : e1467. http://dx.doi.org/10.15845/praxeologi.v1i0.1467.
Texte intégralBufquin, Diego, Robin DiPietro, Marissa Orlowski et Charles Partlow. « Social evaluations of restaurant managers ». International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 30, no 3 (19 mars 2018) : 1827–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-11-2016-0617.
Texte intégralZandniapour, Lily, et Nicole M. Deterding. « Lessons From the Social Innovation Fund ». American Journal of Evaluation 39, no 1 (30 octobre 2017) : 27–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098214017734305.
Texte intégralHinsz, Verlin B., et David C. Matz. « SELF-EVALUATIONS INVOLVED IN GOAL SETTING AND TASK PERFORMANCE ». Social Behavior and Personality : an international journal 25, no 2 (1 janvier 1997) : 177–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1997.25.2.177.
Texte intégralGeorghiou, L. « Meta-evaluation : Evaluation of evaluations ». Scientometrics 45, no 3 (juillet 1999) : 523–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02457622.
Texte intégralPraestgaard, E. « Meta-evaluation : Evaluation of evaluations ». Scientometrics 45, no 3 (juillet 1999) : 531–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02457623.
Texte intégralElliott, Megan, Mark Davies, Julie Davies et Carolyn Wallace. « Exploring how and why social prescribing evaluations work : a realist review ». BMJ Open 12, no 4 (avril 2022) : e057009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057009.
Texte intégralSkarżyńska, Krystyna. « SPRAWIEDLIWOŚĆ JAKO KRYTERIUM OCENY SYSTEMU EKONOMICZNO-POLITYCZNEGO ». Civitas et Lex 5, no 1 (31 mars 2015) : 19–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.31648/cetl.2032.
Texte intégralThèses sur le sujet "Social evaluations"
Dufurrena, Seamus. « Three essays on accounting, professions, and social evaluations ». Electronic Thesis or Diss., Cergy-Pontoise, Ecole supérieure des sciences économiques et commerciales, 2022. http://www.theses.fr/2022ESEC0005.
Texte intégralThough the accounting literature makes ample reference to social evaluation constructs overall, it has remained principally focused on examining the production (e.g. Andon et al., 2014; Çakmaklı et al., 2020; Courtois & Gendron, 2020; Kirkham & Loft, 1993; Michelon et al., 2019; O'Dwyer et al., 2011; Power, 2003b; Robson et al., 2007) and maintenance (e.g. Carnegie & O'Connell, 2012; Dermarkar & Hazgui, 2022; Durocher et al., 2016; Harrington, 2019; Mitchell et al., 1994; Robson et al., 1994; Whittle et al., 2014a) of legitimacy. While important, focusing on the profession's legitimacy only partially fulfills a comprehensive understanding of how accountancy can be defined and perceived as a profession that enjoys the privileges that it does relative to other occupations. Further, where accountancy studies do allude to other social evaluations, such as reputation and status, they are often treated as ancillary features of legitimacy, mentioned in passing, and often remain undefined or under-developed. Similarly, and perhaps because professions are most often associated with positive social evaluations (i.e. legitimacy, status, and reputation), stigma has tended to be neglected in the accountancy literature. This dissertation seeks to address these issues by first synthesizing the literature through a systematic review as well as by further developing knowledge relating to the constructs of stigma and status through two empirical essays. For instance, and with regards to stigma, our understanding of how professional accountants contend with stigma seems confined to stigmatized individuals in the workplace (Stenger & Roulet, 2018) and institutional responses to corporate scandals (Neu & Wright, 1992). This dissertation examines a context in which accounting professionals provide services to firms suffering from core-stigma (Hudson, 2008; Hudson & Okhuysen, 2009), thus shedding light on how the profession contends with the risks of stigma on a more persistent basis. Similarly, while there is a growing body of work that illustrates how elite status is attained and perpetuated among members of the profession, particularly in large professional services firms, attention has primarily been paid to socialization processes that unfold within these organizations, after members have already been inducted (e.g. Anderson-Gough et al., 2000a; Carter & Spence, 2014a). This dissertation focuses instead on the socialization processes that unfold earlier in life (i.e. in the home and in schooling) in order to further explicate the means by which individuals make their way into elite professional organizations and, indeed, integrate into high status social circles. Overall, this dissertation makes theoretical contributions by treating legitimacy, status, reputation and stigma as stand-alone constructs and providing scholarship a basis for better understanding how accountancy manages to uphold professionalism in the eyes of critical social audiences. By viewing professionalism, that is features that distinguish professions from other occupations, through these social evaluation constructs, this dissertation furthers our understanding of how accountancy is able “to convince audiences” of its expertise, its justification for autonomy, its authority over others, and its presumed altruism (Anteby et al., 2016)
Pun, Anthea Colleen. « Foundations of infants' social group evaluations ». Thesis, University of British Columbia, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/54493.
Texte intégralArts, Faculty of
Psychology, Department of
Graduate
Petersén, Anna. « Evaluations that matter in social work ». Doctoral thesis, Örebro universitet, Institutionen för juridik, psykologi och socialt arbete, 2017. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-56146.
Texte intégralBergstrand, Kelly. « Mobilizing for the cause| Grievance evaluations in social movements ». Thesis, The University of Arizona, 2015. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=3702713.
Texte intégralThe role of grievances in drawing public concern and activist support is a surprisingly understudied topic in modern social movement literature. This research is the first to parse grievances into core components to understand whether some grievances are more successful than others in evoking mobilizing, affective and cognitive reactions that can ultimately benefit social movements. I find that not all grievances are created equal when it comes to concern, support and interest in activism, and that the content of grievances can be studied in systematic ways to identify the types of grievances likely to be more powerful injustice events.
This dissertation bridges social psychology and social movements by applying concepts from Affect Control Theory (such as evaluation ratings and deflection) to grievance evaluations. To understand the differential effects of grievances, I break grievances into three basic building blocks—a Perpetrator (Actor), the act itself (Behavior), and the victim (Object). I then use measures of cultural perceptions of the goodness or badness of behaviors and identities to investigate how people react to different configurations of good or bad perpetrators, behavior and victims in injustice events. I posit that two mechanisms—concern about the wellbeing of others and desire for consistency in meanings about the world—drive reactions to the goodness or badness of elements in a grievance. I test hypotheses using an experimental design, specifically a vignette study.
I find strong support, across outcomes, that bad behavior, particularly when directed toward good victims, constitutes a form of grievance that promotes strong mobilizing, affective and cognitive reactions. I also find that the perpetrator matters for many outcomes, but that the effect of perpetrator is weaker than the effect of behavior and its target, tends to be insignificant for measures specific to behavioral activism, and largely disappears in cases of bad behavior toward good victims. In general, bad perpetrators produce higher levels of concern and emotion than do good perpetrators. The results also show that while concerns about the wellbeing of others dominate grievance evaluations, expectations about how the world should be (and deflection from those expectations) are useful for understanding reactions to perpetrators and to injustice events involving good behavior.
The conclusions from this dissertation contribute to a number of social movement arenas, including participation, movement outcomes, framing and emotions. Further, it has the real world implications of suggesting how well particular social issues might fare in attracting public concern and activist attention. This provides insights into both the types of movements more likely to be successful as well as the types of social problems less likely to draw public attention, increasing the chances that such problems persist.
Bhadhuri, Arjun. « Including health spillovers in economic evaluations ». Thesis, University of Birmingham, 2018. http://etheses.bham.ac.uk//id/eprint/8080/.
Texte intégralGabalda, Belonia. « Development of the sense of ownership : social and moral evaluations ». Thesis, Paris 5, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012PA05T035/document.
Texte intégralSince a very young age, the majority of human social interactions involve objects. In these interactions, children seem to take into account who owns what. The notion of ownership thus does not involve only a person and an object, but is a relationship between several persons with respect to an object. This relationship is organized by a set of rules or property rights. Our work deals with children’s understanding of the notion of ownership. At what age do children acquire the understanding of property rights? Before an explicit mastery of the notion of ownership, do children have a more implicit understanding of it? More precisely, we explored the understanding and evaluation of illegitimate and legitimate transfers of property in children from 5 months to 5 years of age. We studied two types of ownership transgressions: illegitimate acquisition of an object (without owner’s intention to transfer it), and absence of restitution of an object to its owner. In all our studies, we presented to children property transfers between two characters using non-verbal animated cartoons or movies with puppets as actors, and then measured children’s understanding and evaluation of those transfers. The studies in Chapter 2 (Studies 1 and 2) assessed children’s evaluation of different modes of acquisition of an object. The two experiments of Study 1 explored 3- and 5-year-olds’s understanding and evaluation of illegitimate and legitimate property transfers. Adults were also tested as a control population. This study is the first one to investigate simultaneously children’s explicit and implicit understanding of the notion of ownership, by asking questions about property rights, as well as social and moral evaluations of the characters implicated in the transfers, respectively. In Study 1a, participants saw a character acquiring an object either in an illegitimate way (theft condition) or in a legitimate one (gift-reception condition). In Study 1b, an illegitimate action (theft) was compared to a legitimate action (giving). 5-year-old children (as adults) showed both an implicit understanding of ownership through their social/moral evaluation (preferring the legitimate agent (gift recipient or giver) compared to the illegitimate agent (thief)), and an explicit understanding of ownership through their ability to attribute different property rights considering the legitimacy of the transfer. 3-year-old children did not make any distinction between the illegitimate and legitimate conditions in their evaluation, neither in their attribution of property rights. These results suggest that children acquire implicit and explicit understanding of ownership at the same time. In Study 1, no emotional reaction was present. We examined in Study 2 the role of the first possessor’s emotions in 3-year-olds’ evaluation of object acquisition. The same cue was present in the legitimate and illegitimate conditions: the first possessor being sad after both transfers. In the presence of this emotional cue, 3-year-olds managed to distinguish between the two conditions in their social/moral evaluation. This distinction could not have been based solely on the presence of a negative emotion, as the emotion displayed was the same in both conditions. We suggest that 3-year-old children detected the moral transgression in the theft condition, and used the negative emotion to confirm it. The studies in Chapter 3 (Studies 3 to 5) examined children’s evaluations of the restitution of an object to its owner. Young children (2-3-year-old) have a bias to consider that the first possessor of an object is its “owner” and that the object cannot be definitively transferred to someone else. We thus investigated whether 3-year-old children (Studies 3 and 4) implicitly evaluate the absence of restitution as a transgression, and evaluate it negatively compared to the restitution of an object to its first possessor…
Clemente, Marco. « Social Evaluations in a Multiple-Audience Context : The Impact of a Social Misconduct on People's Complaints, Share Price and Media Evaluation ». Thesis, Jouy-en Josas, HEC, 2013. http://www.theses.fr/2013EHEC0012/document.
Texte intégralLiterature on social evaluations has mainly analyzed the “audience-candidate” dyad,leaving underexplored the way the evaluation of a main audience (e.g. a social-control agent)influences the evaluation of another audience. This dissertation looks at social evaluations in amultiple-audience context. It focuses on organizational social misconduct - an important, yetunderstudied social evaluation - and it investigates “Why does an audience change its evaluationfollowing organizational social misconduct?”. Each of the three essays focuses on a differentaudience (evaluation): people (people’s complaints), investors (share price) and the media(newspapers’ evaluation). Two novel settings and unique databases were used: advertising selfregulationin the UK and Calciopoli, the scandal that affected the Italian Serie A in 2006. Resultsshow that in case of organizational social misconduct, the evaluation of a social control agent doesinfluence the evaluation of another audience, however this effect is not mechanical. Three primarymoderators emerge from the three essays: the ambiguity of the norm, the saliency of the event, andlocalness of the transgressors. In summary, this dissertation shows that social norms are betterunderstood in a triadic framework: “candidate – social-control agent – another audience”. Socialnorms are not set exogenously, but are endogenously created by the actions of the candidates andthe evaluations of (at least) two audiences
Price, Emma. « What is the role of self-evaluations in social anxiety ? : can self-compassion counter negative evaluation ? » Thesis, University of Southampton, 2008. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.503142.
Texte intégralChen, Xiaoye. « Understanding the many shades of corporate social responsibility-coporate and brand evaluations ». Thesis, McGill University, 2012. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=106343.
Texte intégralLes programmes de responsabilité sociétale institutionnelle (RSE) se retrouvent de plus en plus diversifiés et sophistiques. Malgré l'usage rependu et l'évolution rapide de ces pratiques, peu de recherches marketing visent à examiner les nombreuses nuances de diverses stratégies de responsabilité sociale institutionnelle (Peloza and Shang 2010). Par conséquent, le but de cette thèse est de comprendre comment les diverses orientations stratégiques de responsabilité sociale institutionnelle peuvent donner naissance à des réponses différentes de la part du consommateur. Deux études inter-reliées ont été menées pour parvenir à ce but. L'étude 1 vise à démontrer de façon préliminaire comment les différentes formes de responsabilité sociale institutionnelle (Philanthropique, Promotionnelle et Création de Valeur) sont corrélées avec des évaluations individuelles distinctes de marques institutionnelles qui ont à la base des motivations de responsabilité sociale institutionnelle différentes.L'étude 2 démontre le processus utilisé par les consommateurs pour classifier les divers effets des différentes formes de responsabilité sociale institutionnelle rencontrées. Ensembles, nos études démontrent que lorsque la forme de responsabilité sociale institutionnelle Création de Valeur est perçue comme étant supérieure à celle Philanthropique ou Promotionnelle, les consommateurs attribuent aux institutions misant sur la première forme de responsabilité sociale: 1) une meilleure image (ex : meilleure image et crédibilité de responsabilité sociale institutionnelle); 2) de meilleurs jugements de compétences (ex : meilleure habilité institutionnelle perçue) ainsi qu'une meilleure expertise des produits et une capacité supérieure d'innover. Cette recherche illustre les conditions-limites des effets démontrés ci-dessus en identifiant le rôle modérateur des « compétences institutionnelles » et, par conséquent, contribue à clarifier davantage les processus psychologiques des consommateurs en ce qui a trait aux diverses formes de responsabilité sociale institutionnelles.
Walker, Susan. « The effect of perceived social status on preschool children's evaluations of behaviour ». Thesis, Queensland University of Technology, 1996.
Trouver le texte intégralLivres sur le sujet "Social evaluations"
Theory-driven evaluations. Newbury Park, Calif : Sage Publications, 1990.
Trouver le texte intégralKaren, Shapiro, dir. Designing evaluations of educational and social programs. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, 1987.
Trouver le texte intégralDesigning evaluations. Washington, D.C : The Office, 1991.
Trouver le texte intégralEuropean Social Fund. Programme Evaluation Unit. Impact of evaluations, 1997. Dublin : European Social Fund Evaluation Unit, 1997.
Trouver le texte intégralKatz, Steven T. The shtetl : New evaluations. New York : New York University Press, 2007.
Trouver le texte intégralW, Langenbucher James, Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies. et United States. President's Commission on Model State Drug Laws., dir. Socioeconomic evaluations of addictions treatment. Piscataway, NJ : Center of Alcohol Studies, Rutgers University, 1993.
Trouver le texte intégralKing, Elizabeth M. Timing and duration of exposure in evaluations of social programs. [Washington, D.C : World Bank, 2008.
Trouver le texte intégralBaily, Thelma Falk. Psychological evaluations : An aid to CPS assessment. Denver, Colo : American Humane Association, 1986.
Trouver le texte intégralBaily, Thelma Falk. Psychological evaluations : An aid to CPS assessment. Denver, Colo : American Humane Association, 1986.
Trouver le texte intégralHuey-tsyh, Chen, Rossi Peter Henry 1921- et Policy Studies Organization, dir. Using theory to improve program and policy evaluations. New York : Greenwood Press, 1992.
Trouver le texte intégralChapitres de livres sur le sujet "Social evaluations"
Kabir, Muhammad Ashad, Jun Han et Alan Colman. « Experimental Evaluations ». Dans Pervasive Social Computing, 195–218. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29951-8_9.
Texte intégralZhang, Xiaomei, et Guohong Cao. « Performance Evaluations ». Dans Event Attendance Prediction in Social Networks, 33–45. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89262-3_6.
Texte intégralGläSer, Jochen, et Grit Laudel. « The Social Construction Of Bibliometric Evaluations ». Dans Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, 101–23. Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6746-4_5.
Texte intégralNonnemaker, James, Anna MacMonegle et Matthew Farrelly. « Economic Evaluations of Social Marketing Campaigns ». Dans The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Social Marketing, 1–5. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14449-4_159-1.
Texte intégralWorthen, Blaine R., et Karl R. White. « Uses and Functions of Onsite Evaluations ». Dans Evaluating Educational and Social Programs, 122–29. Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7420-6_5.
Texte intégralGreenberg, Jerald. « The Distributive Justice of Organizational Performance Evaluations ». Dans Justice in Social Relations, 337–51. Boston, MA : Springer US, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5059-0_18.
Texte intégralCasasnovas, Jaume, et J. Vicente Riera. « Weighted Means of Subjective Evaluations ». Dans Soft Computing in Humanities and Social Sciences, 323–45. Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24672-2_18.
Texte intégralGustafsson Sendén, Marie, et Sverker Sikström. « Social Psychology : Evaluations of Social Groups with Statistical Semantics ». Dans Statistical Semantics, 209–18. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37250-7_12.
Texte intégralPechmann, Cornelia, et J. Craig Andrews. « Methodological Issues and Challenges in Conducting Social Impact Evaluations ». Dans Scaling Social Impact, 219–34. New York : Palgrave Macmillan US, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230113565_13.
Texte intégralRuijten, Peter A. M., et Raymond H. Cuijpers. « If Drones Could See : Investigating Evaluations of a Drone with Eyes ». Dans Social Robotics, 65–74. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05204-1_7.
Texte intégralActes de conférences sur le sujet "Social evaluations"
Song, Zhuoyuan. « Self-Evaluations and Social Comparison ». Dans 2021 3rd International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural Industry (ICEMCI 2021). Paris, France : Atlantis Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211209.471.
Texte intégralRaheja, Roshni. « Social Evaluations of Accented Englishes : An Indian Perspective ». Dans GLOCAL Conference on Asian Linguistic Anthropology 2020. The GLOCAL Unit, SOAS University of London, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.47298/cala2020.1-1.
Texte intégralHolm, Jon, et Anette Askedal. « Evaluation of societal impact in Norwegian SSH evaluations ». Dans "Impact of Social Sciences and Humanities for a European Research Agenda Valuation of SSH in mission-oriented research". fteval - Platform for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.22163/fteval.2019.382.
Texte intégralHellen O. da Silva, Thiago, Lavínia Matoso Freitas, Marília Soares Mendes et Elizabeth Sucupira Furtado. « Textual evaluation vs. User testing : a comparative analysis ». Dans X Workshop sobre Aspectos da Interação Humano-Computador na Web Social. Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (SBC), 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.5753/waihcws.2019.7673.
Texte intégralVocht, Frank de, Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi, Cheryl McQuire, Kate Tilling, Matthew Hickman et Peter Craig. « P39 Evaluations of public health interventions using natural experiment evaluation designs and the ‘target trial’ framework ». Dans Society for Social Medicine Annual Scientific Meeting Abstracts. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2021-ssmabstracts.127.
Texte intégralZhang, Xiaoying, Hong Xie et John C. S. Lui. « Sybil Detection in Social-Activity Networks : Modeling, Algorithms and Evaluations ». Dans 2018 IEEE 26th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP). IEEE, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icnp.2018.00015.
Texte intégralMead, Ross, et Maja J. Mataric. « Proxemics and performance : Subjective human evaluations of autonomous sociable robot distance and social signal understanding ». Dans 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iros.2015.7354229.
Texte intégralMinetaki, Kazunori. « Twitter Discussions and evaluations about the delta variant of COVID-19 in Japan ». Dans MISNC2021 : The 8th Multidisciplinary International Social Networks Conference. New York, NY, USA : ACM, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3504006.3504016.
Texte intégralRico, Julie, et Stephen Brewster. « Gesture and voice prototyping for early evaluations of social acceptability in multimodal interfaces ». Dans International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces and the Workshop on Machine Learning for Multimodal Interaction. New York, New York, USA : ACM Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1891903.1891925.
Texte intégralAborujilah, Abdulaziz, Rasheed Mohammad Nassr, Shahrulniza Bin Musa et Munaisyah Abdullah. « IT Students' Sentiment of Faculty Evaluations and Posting Opinions on Social Media Networks ». Dans IMCOM '18 : The 12th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication. New York, NY, USA : ACM, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3164541.3164579.
Texte intégralRapports d'organisations sur le sujet "Social evaluations"
Heckman, James, Jeffrey Smith et Christopher Taber. Accounting for Dropouts in Evaluations of Social Experiments. Cambridge, MA : National Bureau of Economic Research, septembre 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/t0166.
Texte intégralCrincoli, Tim, Ella Beveridge et Howard White. Development project evaluations in Malawi : A Country Evaluation Map. Centre for Excellence and Development Impact and Learning (CEDIL), novembre 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.51744/cswp6.
Texte intégralMoffitt, Robert. The Role of Randomized Field Trials in Social Science Research : A Perspective from Evaluations of Reforms of Social Welfare Programs. Cambridge, MA : National Bureau of Economic Research, octobre 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/t0295.
Texte intégralTripathi, Stuti, Kanika Jha Kingra, Francis Rathinam, Tony Tyrrell et Marie Gaarder. Social protection : a synthesis of evidence and lessons from 3ie- supported impact evaluations. International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie), juin 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.23846/wp0034.
Texte intégralRathinam, Francis, P. Thissen et M. Gaarder. Using big data for impact evaluations. Centre of Excellence for Development Impact and Learning (CEDIL), février 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.51744/cmb2.
Texte intégralSon, Jihyeong, NIgel AR Joseph et Vicki McCracken. Instagram Captions Matter. How Regulatory Fit Relates to Consumer Interactions and Brand Evaluations on Social Media. Ames (Iowa) : Iowa State University. Library, janvier 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/itaa.10233.
Texte intégralMacura, Biljana, Sarah Dickin, Hugh Sharma Waddington, Carla Liera, Adriana Soto, Arianna Orlando, Ella Foggit et al. Gender and social outcomes of WASH interventions : synthesis of research evidence. Centre for Excellence and Development Impact and Learning (CEDIL), mars 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.51744/cswp7.
Texte intégralBarakat, Sarah, Alexia Pretari et Jaynie Vonk. Centring Gender and Power in Evaluation and Research : Sharing experiences from Oxfam GB's quantitative impact evaluations. Oxfam GB, juillet 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.21201/2021/7789.
Texte intégralStrachan, Anna. Lessons Learned from Humanitarian Interventions in Ukraine (2014-2021). Institute of Development Studies, décembre 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/k4d.2022.046.
Texte intégralBassi, Andrea. From “Social Impact” to “Social Value”. Liège : CIRIEC, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.25518/ciriec.wp202206.
Texte intégral