Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « Precut papillotomy »

Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres

Choisissez une source :

Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « Precut papillotomy ».

À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.

Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.

Articles de revues sur le sujet "Precut papillotomy"

1

Park, S.-H., et TH Lee. « Precut Papillotomy with Isolated-Tip Needle-Knife Papillotome ». Video Journal and Encyclopedia of GI Endoscopy 1, no 2 (octobre 2013) : 523–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s2212-0971(13)70229-2.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Palm, Jukka, Arto Saarela et Jyrki M??kel? ? « Safety of Erlangen Precut Papillotomy ». Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology 41, no 5 (mai 2007) : 528–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/mcg.0b013e31802b8728.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
3

Conio, Massimo, Sebastiano Saccomanno, Hugo Aste et Vittorio Pugliese. « Precut papillotomy : primum non nocere ». Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 36, no 5 (septembre 1990) : 544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(90)71150-9.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
4

Wilcox, C. Mel, et Klaus F. Mönkemüller. « Wire-assisted minor papilla precut papillotomy ». Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 54, no 1 (juillet 2001) : 83–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mge.2001.115474.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
5

Huibregtse, K., R. M. Katon et G. N. J. Tytgat. « Precut papillotomy via fine-needle knife papillotome : a safe and effective technique ». Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 32, no 6 (décembre 1986) : 403–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(86)71921-4.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
6

Miyatani, Hiroyuki, et Yukio Yoshida. « Endoscopic Needle Knife Precut Papillotomy for Inaccessible Bile Duct following Failed Pancreatic Duct Access ». Clinical Medicine. Gastroenterology 2 (16 décembre 2008) : CGast.S1120. http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/cgast.s1120.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Aims To evaluate the safety, effectiveness, success rate and complications of needle knife precut papillotomy for inaccessible bile duct after failed pancreatic ducts access. Methods Selective common bile duct cannulation was required for 582 patients from November 2004 to May 2008. Precut sphincterotomy was performed in 28 patients (16 male, 12 female; mean age 71). When standard bile duct cannulation was unsuccessful after more than 20 minutes, the bile duct was considered inaccessible. Group A consisted of patients where pancreatic duct access was possible and transpancreatic papillary septotomy was performed (20 patients). If pancreatic duct cannulation also failed, needle knife precut method was performed and these patients belonged to group B (8 patients). The success and complication rates of the two groups were compared using the Chi-square test. Results The success rates were 85% and 87.5% respectively. Of the 28 patients in group A, 6 had mild to moderate pancreatitis and one patient had mild bleeding. The complication rates were 35% and 0% respectively and the differences were not significant. Conclusion Needle knife precut papillotomy is useful and acceptable in patients after failed pancreatic duct access.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
7

Zimmon, DS. « Endoscopic sphincterotomy - The basics ». Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology 4, no 9 (1990) : 559–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1990/691410.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Endoscopic sphincterotomy refers to the incision of the terminal portion of the biliary or pancreatic ducts by a variety of techniques, depending on anatomic circumstances, goals and risks. Alternative methods include percutaneous transhepatic or surgical techniques. The initial Erlangen method - complete sphinccerotomy - carried an unavoidable risk of perforation and hemorrhage. Fractional incision or 'endoscopic papillotomy' - incision of the inferior sphincter - carries no risk of hemorrhage or perforation, done properly. Techniques of papillotomy including 'pull,' 'precut,' stent placement, infundibulotomy, percutaneous cholangiography, and internal spring wire are described, and general electrosurgical principles discussed.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
8

Liang, Yun-Xiao. « Needle-knife precut papillotomy for difficult biliary cannulation ». World Chinese Journal of Digestology 22, no 8 (2014) : 1153. http://dx.doi.org/10.11569/wcjd.v22.i8.1153.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
9

Cárdenas, A., et G. Fernández-Esparrach. « Precut Papillotomy for Access into the Bile Duct ». Video Journal and Encyclopedia of GI Endoscopy 1, no 2 (octobre 2013) : 520–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s2212-0971(13)70228-0.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
10

Cotton, Peter B. « Precut papillotomy—a risky technique for experts only ». Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 35, no 6 (novembre 1989) : 578–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(89)72921-7.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

Thèses sur le sujet "Precut papillotomy"

1

DAMINI, Federica. « Efficacy and safety of precut sphincterotomy for therapeutic ERCP : a prospective study in a tertiary referral center ». Doctoral thesis, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/11562/396539.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
BACKGROUND: La colangiografia retrograda endoscopica (ERCP) con intento terapeutico richiede l’incannulazione selettiva della via biliare principale e/o del dotto pancreatico. Se tale incannulazione fallisce, si pone la scelta se utilizzare tecniche più invasive (es. precut della papilla) o interrompere l’esame e procedere con metodiche alternative (es. PTBD). OBIETTIVI: Confrontare il tasso di successo e di complicanze della papillotomia-precut e della sfinterotomia endoscopica (EST) standard. In caso di insuccesso dell’ERCP, valutare i trattamenti utilizzati e le complicanze ad essi correlate. METODI: Nel nostro centro ospedaliero e universitario di riferimento per la patologia pancreatica, tra gennaio 2007 e aprile 2010 è stato condotto uno studio prospettico osservazionale sui pazienti sottoposti a ERCP. Sono stati considerati due gruppi: a) tutti i pazienti sottoposti a papillotomia precut; b) un sottogruppo di pazienti sottoposti a EST standard (selezionando consecutivamente un paziente ogni quattro). La misura di esito primaria è stata considerare il tasso di successo e di complicanze della varie metodiche. RISULTATI: Sono state eseguite in totale 783 ERCP, delle quali 755 con intento terapeutico. La papillotomia precut è stata praticata nel 17.3% di tutte le ERCP terapeutiche (131/755; 51.1% femmine; età media 65.5±13.7 anni). Il tasso di successo globale è stato del 73.3% (96/131) con una variabilità tra operatori che va dal 63.1% all’83.3%. Il tasso di complicanze è stato del 5.3% (7/131); non c’è stata mortalità correlata alla procedura. Le procedure endoscopiche, in questo gruppo, sono risultate essere ad elevato grado di difficoltà nel 46.6% dei casi (grado 3 sec. la classificazione di Cotton). Il grado di difficoltà era inversamente correlato al tasso di successo (p<0.01), ma non correlato al tasso di complicanze. Il precut non è stato coronato da successo in 35 pazienti, che sono stati quindi sottoposti a: PTBD in 18 casi (51.4%), trattamento medico e follow-up radiologico in 11 casi (31.4%), trattamento chirurgico negli altri 6 (17.2%). Il PTBD ha registrato il 22.2% di complicanze (2 colangiti e 2 sanguinamenti con necessità di emotrasfusione). La EST standard è stata eseguita in 151 casi (corrispondenti al 20% di tutte le ERCP terapeutiche): il 56.3% erano femmine; l’età media era 63.5±17.6 anni. Il tasso di successo globale è stato del 92.7% (140/151), con una variabilità tra operatori che va dall’88.8% al 97.2%. Il tasso di complicanze è stato del 7.3% (11/151). Le procedure endoscopiche, in questo gruppo, sono risultate essere ad elevato grado di difficoltà nel 25% dei casi (grado 3 sec. la classificazione di Cotton). Se si considerano solamente le complicanze severe, si evidenzia una lieve prevalenza di casi nel gruppo dei precut (2.3%) rispetto al gruppo delle EST standard (1.3%) (p=ns). CONCLUSIONI: in una serie consecutiva di pazienti, con un’alta proporzione di casi difficili, il precut della papilla risulta essere una tecnica efficace e associata ad un accettabile tasso di complicanze.
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) involves selective cannulation of the common bile and/or pancreatic ducts. If the cannulation fails, there is the choice whether to use more invasive procedures (i.d. precut papillotomy) or stop the esamination and proceed with alternative methods (i.d. percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage - PTBD). OBJECTIVES: To compare the success and complication rates of precut papillotomy and of standard endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST). In cases of ERCP failure, to identify treatments used and its complications. METHODS: A prospective observational study was carried out on patients who underwent ERCP in a tertiary referral university hospital between January 2007 and April 2010. Two groups were studied: a) all the patients who underwent precut papillotomy; b) a subgroup of patients who underwent a standard EST (consecutively selecting a patient every four). The success and complication rates associated to the various methods were considered the main outcome measurements. RESULTS: A total of 783 ERCPs were performed, 755 with therapeutic intent. A precut papillotomy was carried out in 17.3% of total therapeutic ERCP (131/755; 51.1% females; mean age 65.5±13.7). The overall success rate was 73.3% (96/131) with an intra-operator variability between 63.1% and 83.3%. The complication rate was 5.3% (7/131); there were no cases of death. In this group 46.6% of cases were classified as presenting a high grade of difficulty (grade 3 of Cotton’s classification). The grade of difficulty was found to be inversely correlated with the success rate (p<0.01) but not with the complication rate. Papillotomy failed in 35 patients who then underwent: PTBD in 18 cases (51.4%), medical treatment and radiological follow-up in 11 (31.4%), and surgery in 6 (17.2%). PTBD was associated to a 22.2% rate of complications (2 cholangitis and 2 bleeding requiring blood transfusion). A standard EST was carried out in 151 cases (corresponding to 20% of the total therapeutic ERCPs): 56.3% female; mean age 63.5±17.6. The overall success rate was 92.7% (140/151) with an intra-operator variability between 88.8% and 97.2%. The complication rate was 7.3% (11/151). Twenty-five percent of standard EST were graded as presenting a high degree of difficulty (grade 3 of Cotton’s classification). If only severe complications are considered, there is only a slight prevalence in the precut group (2.3%) with respect to the standard EST group (1.3%) (p=ns). CONCLUSION: In a consecutive series of patients with a high proportion of difficult cases, papilla precutting is an useful technique with an acceptable complication rate.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

Chapitres de livres sur le sujet "Precut papillotomy"

1

Chandran, Sujievvan, Gary May et Paul Kortan. « Access (Precut) Papillotomy ». Dans Ercp, 123–31. Elsevier, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-48109-0.00015-8.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Kortan, Paul, et Gary May. « Access (Precut) Papillotomy ». Dans ERCP, 116–23. Elsevier, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-4557-2367-6.00014-7.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Nous offrons des réductions sur tous les plans premium pour les auteurs dont les œuvres sont incluses dans des sélections littéraires thématiques. Contactez-nous pour obtenir un code promo unique!

Vers la bibliographie