Bibliographies thématiques / Perireceptor events / Articles de revues
Pour voir les autres types de publications sur ce sujet consultez le lien suivant : Perireceptor events.

Articles de revues sur le sujet « Perireceptor events »

Auteur : Grafiati
Publié le 25 janvier 2025

Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres

Choisissez une source :

Consultez les 15 meilleurs articles de revues pour votre recherche sur le sujet « Perireceptor events ».

À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.

Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.

Parcourez les articles de revues sur diverses disciplines et organisez correctement votre bibliographie.

1

Pelosi, Paolo. « Perireceptor events in olfaction ». Journal of Neurobiology 30, no 1 (mai 1996) : 3–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4695(199605)30:1<3 ::aid-neu2>3.0.co;2-a.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Leal, W. S., H. Wojtasek, Jean-Francois Picimbon, S. Kuwaharat, H. Saito et M. Hasegawa. « Perireceptor Events in Pheromone Perception in Scarab Beetles ». Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 1, no 1 (mars 1998) : 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1226-8615(08)60001-1.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
3

Carr, William E. S., Richard A. Gleeson et Henry G. Trapido-Rosenthal. « The role of perireceptor events in chemosensory processes ». Trends in Neurosciences 13, no 6 (juin 1990) : 212–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0166-2236(90)90162-4.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
4

Pelosi, P. « The role of perireceptor events in vertebrate olfaction ». Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 58, no 4 (avril 2001) : 503–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/pl00000875.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
5

Menco, Bert Ph M. « Ultrastructural aspects of olfactory transduction and perireceptor events ». Seminars in Cell Biology 5, no 1 (février 1994) : 11–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/scel.1994.1003.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
6

Kaissling, K. E. « Olfactory Perireceptor and Receptor Events in Moths : A Kinetic Model ». Chemical Senses 26, no 2 (1 février 2001) : 125–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chemse/26.2.125.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
7

Kaissling, Karl-Ernst. « Olfactory perireceptor and receptor events in moths : a kinetic model revised ». Journal of Comparative Physiology A 195, no 10 (21 août 2009) : 895–922. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00359-009-0461-4.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
8

Heydel, Jean-Marie, Alexandra Coelho, Nicolas Thiebaud, Arièle Legendre, Anne-Marie Le Bon, Philippe Faure, Fabrice Neiers, Yves Artur, Jérôme Golebiowski et Loïc Briand. « Odorant-Binding Proteins and Xenobiotic Metabolizing Enzymes : Implications in Olfactory Perireceptor Events ». Anatomical Record 296, no 9 (31 juillet 2013) : 1333–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ar.22735.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
9

Derby, C. D., H. S. Cate et L. R. Gentilcore. « Perireception in olfaction : molecular mass sieving by aesthetasc sensillar cuticle determines odorant access to receptor sites in the Caribbean spiny lobster Panulirus argus. » Journal of Experimental Biology 200, no 15 (1 août 1997) : 2073–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.200.15.2073.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
The responsiveness of chemoreceptor neurons depends on a combination of perireceptor and receptor events. Olfactory neurons of crustaceans are packaged into distinctive cuticular sensilla called aesthetascs. The cuticle of aesthetascs is thin and permeable, even though it does not contain any obvious surface pores or pore tubules. This suggests that this 'spongy' aesthetasc cuticle may act as a molecular sieve that restricts large odorant molecules from entering the sensilla and binding to the olfactory neurons. We examined whether this is so for the aesthetasc cuticle of the Caribbean spiny lobster Panulirus argus. We used a chromatographic column packed with aesthetasc cuticle and connected to a flow-through ultraviolet spectrophotometer to measure the elution times of ultraviolet-absorbent molecular mass markers between 165 and 2 x 10(6) Da. Molecules larger than approximately 8.5 kDa had similar elution times, indicating that they did not penetrate the cuticle. Molecules smaller than 8.5 kDa had longer elution times that were directly and inversely proportional to their molecular mass. These results suggest that aesthetasc cuticle excludes molecules larger than 8.5 kDa from having access to the olfactory receptor neurons. We conclude that the molecular sieving capacity of the aesthetasc cuticle of P. argus is a perireceptor mechanism that is a critical determinant of the types of molecules capable of stimulating its olfactory receptors.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
10

Getchell, Thomas V., et William E. S. Carr. « Perireceptor events : chemical reception involves more than just receptors, G-proteins and second messengers ». Chemical Senses 15, no 2 (1990) : 179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chemse/15.2.179.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
11

Rospars, J. P., V. Krivan et P. Lansky. « Perireceptor and Receptor Events in Olfaction. Comparison of Concentration and Flux Detectors : a Modeling Study ». Chemical Senses 25, no 3 (1 juin 2000) : 293–311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chemse/25.3.293.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
12

Leal, Walter Soares. « Molecules and macromolecules involved in chemical communication of scarab beetles ». Pure and Applied Chemistry 73, no 3 (1 janvier 2001) : 613–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1351/pac200173030613.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Chemical communication involves the production and release of specific chemicals (pheromones and other semiochemicals) by the emitter, and the detection and olfactory processing of these signals leading to appropriate behavioral responses in the receiver. In contrast to most of the scarab species investigated to date, the Japanese and Osaka beetles have the ability to detect the allospecific pheromone, which plays a pivotal role in the isolation mechanism between these two species. Each species produces a single enantiomer of japonilure [(Z)-5-(dec1-enyl)oxacyclopentan-2-one], but they have evolved the ability to detect both enantiomers, one as an attractant and the other as a behavioral antagonist (stop signal). There is growing evidence in the literature that the inordinate sensitivity and selectivity of the insect olfactory system is achieved by a combination of various olfactory-specific proteins, namely, odorant-binding proteins (OBPs), odorant receptors (ORs), and odorant-degrading enzymes. The relationship between the pheromone structures and the primary sequences of the proteins suggest that OBPs play a part in the selectivity of the olfactory system in scarab beetles by "filtering" chemical signals during the early olfactory processing (perireceptor events). Nevertheless, it is unlikely that pheromone-binding proteins are "chiral filters" as the Japanese and Osaka beetles each possess only one single binding protein. Upon interaction with negatively charged membranes, OBPs undergo conformational changes that may lead to the release of the ligands.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
13

Boichot, Valentin, Mariam Muradova, Clément Nivet, Alena Proskura, Jean-Marie Heydel, Marie-Chantal Canivenc-Lavier, Francis Canon, Fabrice Neiers et Mathieu Schwartz. « The role of perireceptor events in flavor perception ». Frontiers in Food Science and Technology 2 (19 octobre 2022). http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frfst.2022.989291.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
The sensory perception of food is a complex phenomenon involving the integration of different stimuli (aroma, taste, trigeminal sensations, texture and visual). Flavor compounds activate odorant, taste and trigeminal chemoreceptors, generating a depolarization of the sensory neurons and then the consciousness of food flavor perception. Recent studies are increasingly highlighting the importance of perireceptor events, which include all the molecular events surrounding the receptors, in the modulation of flavor perception. These events affect the quantity and quality of flavor compounds in the environment of chemoreceptors. They include the metabolization of flavor compounds by enzymes present in biological fluids (saliva and mucus) and the oronasal epithelia and noncovalent interactions with binding proteins. Perireceptor mechanisms have been extensively studied in insects and mammals, demonstrating the importance of the entailed processes in the termination of the chemical signal. In humans, research is in full swing. Here, we reviewed the perireceptor mechanisms recently reported in vitro, in biological fluids and in cells and in vivo in humans. These studies indicate that perireceptor mechanisms likely have an important contribution to flavor perception. This mini-review focuses on recent pioneering studies that are paving the way for this new research area. It also suggests that new approaches taking into account the real conditions of food consumption will be required in the future to accurately address this question.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
14

Manzini, Ivan. « Perireceptor events and peripheral modulation of olfactory signals in the olfactory epithelium of vertebrates ». Neuroforum, 8 juillet 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/nf-2022-0005.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Abstract The olfactory epithelium (OE) and its associated perireceptor space, i.e., the mucus layer (ML) covering the epithelium, are the most peripheral parts of the vertebrate olfactory system. The olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs), one of the cell types of the OE, are the odorant detectors of the olfactory system. These bipolar neurons extend their apical appendages, which express odorant receptors, into the ML. The binding of odorants to odorant receptors is the initial step of odor processing. The vast majority of research on the peripheral olfactory system has focused on the ORNs and the molecular components of the olfactory transduction cascades. Less attention has been directed to the other cell types of the OE and their physiological functions. For a long time, it was assumed that the olfactory signals detected in the OE are transmitted to the olfactory bulb without preprocessing, but this view turned out to be over-simplistic. It has been shown that the olfactory signals are critically modulated already in the OE. Despite compelling evidence, many descriptions of the olfactory system still ignore the existence of these peripheral modulatory mechanisms. The importance of peripheral modulation of the olfactory signals, the physiological functions of the other epithelial cell types, the extrinsic innervation of the olfactory mucosa, and the perireceptor space are only slowly coming into focus in the olfactory research. Furthermore, several intraepithelial signaling pathways that signal epithelial damage and initiate regenerative processes have recently been discovered. This review provides a concise overview of the current knowledge of peripheral events in the olfactory mucosa and the perireceptor space.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
15

Paesani, Massimiliano, Arthur G. Goetzee, Sanne Abeln et Halima Mouhib. « Odorant Binding Proteins Facilitate the Gas‐Phase Uptake of Odorants Through the Nasal Mucus ». Chemistry – A European Journal, 7 novembre 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.202403058.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Mammalian odorant binding proteins (OBPs) have long been suggested to transport hydrophobic odorant molecules through the aqueous environment of the nasal mucus. While the function of OBPs as odorant transporters is supported by their hydrophobic beta‐barrel structure, no rationale has been provided on why and how these proteins facilitate the uptake of odorants from the gas phase. Here, a multi‐scale computational approach validated through available high‐resolution spectroscopy experiments reveals that the conformational space explored by carvone inside the binding cavity of porcine OBP (pOBP) is much closer to the gas than the aqueous phase, and that pOBP effectively manages to transport odorants by lowering the free energy barrier of odorant uptake. Understanding such perireceptor events is crucial to fully unravel the molecular processes underlying the olfactory sense and move towards the development of protein‐based biomimetic sensor units that can serve as artificial noses.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Nous offrons des réductions sur tous les plans premium pour les auteurs dont les œuvres sont incluses dans des sélections littéraires thématiques. Contactez-nous pour obtenir un code promo unique!

Vers la bibliographie