Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « Multi risk assessment »
Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres
Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « Multi risk assessment ».
À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.
Articles de revues sur le sujet "Multi risk assessment"
Nicolis, Orietta, Jozef Kiseľák, Francesco Porro et Milan Stehlík. « Multi-fractal cancer risk assessment ». Stochastic Analysis and Applications 35, no 2 (8 décembre 2016) : 237–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07362994.2016.1238766.
Texte intégralKhatakho, Rajesh, Dipendra Gautam, Komal Raj Aryal, Vishnu Prasad Pandey, Rajesh Rupakhety, Suraj Lamichhane, Yi-Chung Liu et al. « Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment of Kathmandu Valley, Nepal ». Sustainability 13, no 10 (11 mai 2021) : 5369. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13105369.
Texte intégralReeves, Carla. « How multi-agency are Multi-Agency Risk Assessment Committees ? » Probation Journal 60, no 1 (17 février 2013) : 40–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0264550512470187.
Texte intégralLi, Xiaopeng, et Fuqiu Li. « Reliability Assessment of Space Station Based on Multi-Layer and Multi-Type Risks ». Applied Sciences 11, no 21 (1 novembre 2021) : 10258. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app112110258.
Texte intégralChandani, Priyanka, et Chetna Gupta. « An Early Multi-Criteria Risk Assessment Model ». Journal of Cases on Information Technology 21, no 2 (avril 2019) : 51–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jcit.2019040104.
Texte intégralStrecker, Stefan, David Heise et Ulrich Frank. « RiskM : A multi-perspective modeling method for IT risk assessment ». Information Systems Frontiers 13, no 4 (4 mai 2010) : 595–611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10796-010-9235-3.
Texte intégralŠugareková, M. « Flood risk assessment methodology ». IOP Conference Series : Materials Science and Engineering 1209, no 1 (1 décembre 2021) : 012025. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1209/1/012025.
Texte intégralGallina, Valentina, Silvia Torresan, Alex Zabeo, Andrea Critto, Thomas Glade et Antonio Marcomini. « A Multi-Risk Methodology for the Assessment of Climate Change Impacts in Coastal Zones ». Sustainability 12, no 9 (2 mai 2020) : 3697. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12093697.
Texte intégralHeck, Nadine, Michael W. Beck, Borja Reguero, Kerstin Pfliegner, Max Ricker et Ruben Prütz. « Global climate change risk to fisheries – A multi-risk assessment ». Marine Policy 148 (février 2023) : 105404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105404.
Texte intégralVlek, Charles A. J. « A multi-level, multi-stage and multi-attribute perspective on risk assessment, decision-making and risk control ». Risk Decision and Policy 1, no 1 (1 avril 1996) : 9–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/135753096348772.
Texte intégralThèses sur le sujet "Multi risk assessment"
Zhang, Su. « Quantitative risk assessment under multi-context environments ». Diss., Kansas State University, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/18634.
Texte intégralDepartment of Computing and Information Sciences
Xinming Ou
If you cannot measure it, you cannot improve it. Quantifying security with metrics is important not only because we want to have a scoring system to track our efforts in hardening cyber environments, but also because current labor resources cannot administrate the exponentially enlarged network without a feasible risk prioritization methodology. Unlike height, weight or temperature, risk from vulnerabilities is sophisticated to assess and the assessment is heavily context-dependent. Existing vulnerability assessment methodologies (e.g. CVSS scoring system, etc) mainly focus on the evaluation over intrinsic risk of individual vulnerabilities without taking their contexts into consideration. Vulnerability assessment over network usually output one aggregated metric indicating the security level of each host. However, none of these work captures the severity change of each individual vulnerabilities under different contexts. I have captured a number of such contexts for vulnerability assessment. For example, the correlation of vulnerabilities belonging to the same application should be considered while aggregating their risk scores. At system level, a vulnerability detected on a highly depended library code should be assigned with a higher risk metric than a vulnerability on a rarely used client side application, even when the two have the same intrinsic risk. Similarly at cloud environment, vulnerabilities with higher prevalences deserve more attention. Besides, zero-day vulnerabilities are largely utilized by attackers therefore should not be ignored while assessing the risks. Historical vulnerability information at application level can be used to predict underground risks. To assess vulnerability with a higher accuracy, feasibility, scalability and efficiency, I developed a systematic vulnerability assessment approach under each of these contexts.
Juarez, Garcia Hugon. « Multi-hazard risk assessment : an interdependency approach ». Thesis, University of British Columbia, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/27271.
Texte intégralBani-Mustafa, Tasneem. « Multi-Hazards Risk Aggregation Considering the Trustworthiness of the Risk Assessment ». Thesis, Université Paris-Saclay (ComUE), 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019SACLC096.
Texte intégralThis PhD thesis addresses the problem of Multi-Hazards Risk Aggregation (MHRA), which aims at aggregating the risk estimates from Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) models for the different contributors. The current practice of MHRA is based on a simple arithmetic summation of the risk estimates. However, the risk estimates are obtained from PRA models that have different degrees of trustworthiness, because of the different background knowledge they are based on. Ignoring this difference in MHRA could lead to misleading results for Decision-Making (DM). In this thesis, a structured framework is proposed to assess the level of trustworthiness, which risk assessment results are based on and to integrate it in the process of MHRA. The original scientific contributions are: (i) Factors contributing to the trustworthiness of risk assessment outcomes are identified and their criticalities are analyzed under different frameworks, to understand their influence on the risk results; (ii) An integrated hierarchical framework is developed for assessing the trustworthiness of risk analysis, based on the identified factors and related attributes; (iii) A reduced order model-based method is proposed to efficiently evaluate the trustworthiness of risk assessment in practice. Through the reduced-order model, the proposed method can limit the number of elements considered in the original risk assessment; (iv) A technique that combines Dempster Shafer Theory and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (namely, DSTAHP) is applied to the developed framework to assess the trustworthiness by a weighted average of the attributes in the framework: the AHP method is used to derive the weights of the attributes and the DST is used to account for the subjective uncertainty in the experts’ judgments for the evaluation of the weights; (v) A MHRA technique is developed based on Bayesian model averaging, to overcome the limitations of the current practice of risk aggregation that neglects the trustworthiness of the risk assessment of individual hazard groups; (vi) The developed framework is applied to real case studies from the Nuclear Power Plants (NPP) industry
Chiu, Kenneth. « Generalized Gaussian covariance analysis in multi-market risk assessment ». Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1995. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/35449.
Texte intégralGehl, P. « Bayesian networks for the multi-risk assessment of road infrastructure ». Thesis, University College London (University of London), 2017. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1546080/.
Texte intégralHahn, Lukas [Verfasser]. « Quantitative assessment of multi-year non-life insurance risk / Lukas Hahn ». Ulm : Universität Ulm, 2019. http://d-nb.info/119313966X/34.
Texte intégralHahn, Lukas Josef [Verfasser]. « Quantitative assessment of multi-year non-life insurance risk / Lukas Hahn ». Ulm : Universität Ulm, 2019. http://d-nb.info/119313966X/34.
Texte intégralPham, Hung Vuong <1988>. « Multi-risk assessment of freshwater ecosystem services under climate change conditions ». Doctoral thesis, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10579/17841.
Texte intégralLARI, SERENA. « Multi scale heuristic and quantitative multi-risk assessment in the Lombardy region, with uncertainty propagation ». Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10281/7550.
Texte intégralTerzi, Stefano <1988>. « Multi-risk assessment within the context of climate change in mountain regions ». Doctoral thesis, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10579/17837.
Texte intégralLivres sur le sujet "Multi risk assessment"
Abella, Enrique Armando Castellanos. Multi-scale landslide risk assessment in Cuba. Enschede : International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation, 2008.
Trouver le texte intégralAbella, Enrique Armando Castellanos. Multi-scale landslide risk assessment in Cuba. Enschede : International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation, 2008.
Trouver le texte intégralAbella, Enrique Armando Castellanos. Multi-scale landslide risk assessment in Cuba. Enschede : International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation, 2008.
Trouver le texte intégralRen, Jingzheng, dir. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Risk Assessment and Management. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78152-1.
Texte intégralGul, Muhammet, Suleyman Mete, Faruk Serin et Erkan Celik. Fine–Kinney-Based Fuzzy Multi-criteria Occupational Risk Assessment. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52148-6.
Texte intégralAndy, Alaszewski, et English National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting., dir. Risk assessment and management in multi-agency, multi-professional health care : Education and practice. London : English National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting, 1998.
Trouver le texte intégralR, Parkhurst Benjamin, Cadmus Group et Water Environment Research Foundation, dir. Aquatic ecological risk assessment : A multi-tiered approach : project 91-AER-1. Alexandria, VA : Water Environment Research Foundation, 1996.
Trouver le texte intégralHmara, Ivan, et Viktor Strel'nikov. Environmental epidemiology and risk assessment. ru : INFRA-M Academic Publishing LLC., 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/1019063.
Texte intégralOlsen, Odd Einar. Standardization and risk governance : A multi-disciplinary approach. Abingdon, Oxon : Routledge, 2020.
Trouver le texte intégralSETAC Workshop on Framework for Ecological Risk Management (1997 Williamsburg, Va.). A multi-stakeholder framework for ecological risk management : Summary of a SETAC technical workshop. Pensacola, FL : SETAC Press, 1998.
Trouver le texte intégralChapitres de livres sur le sujet "Multi risk assessment"
Zhang, Limin. « Multi-hazard Risk Assessment ». Dans Desiderata Geotechnica, 227–36. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14987-1_27.
Texte intégralMussen, Filip. « Benefit–Risk Assessment ». Dans Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Support Healthcare Decisions, 105–18. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47540-0_7.
Texte intégralWilliams, Steve, et Berndt Müller. « Agents and Dementia — Smart Risk Assessment ». Dans Multi-Agent Systems and Agreement Technologies, 277–84. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59294-7_22.
Texte intégralCrawford-Brown, Douglas J., et Hwong-Wen Ma. « Multi-Pathway and Cumulative Risk Assessment ». Dans Handbook of Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing, 417–37. Boston, MA : Springer US, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1727-6_18.
Texte intégralBhunia, Gouri Sankar, et Pravat Kumar Shit. « Geospatial Technology for Multi-hazard Risk Assessment ». Dans Advances in Geographic Information Science, 1–18. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75197-5_1.
Texte intégralPeña, Neiler de Jesús Medina. « Adra-Adaptive Disaster Risk Assessment ». Dans Adaptive Disaster Risk Assessment Combining Multi-Hazards With Socioeconomic Vulnerability and Dynamic Exposure, 199–210. London : CRC Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003220749-8.
Texte intégralSchumann, Andreas H., et David Nijssen. « Application of Scenarios and Multi-Criteria Decision Making Tools in Flood Polder Planning ». Dans Flood Risk Assessment and Management, 249–75. Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9917-4_12.
Texte intégralTaflanidis, Alexandros A., Gaofeng Jia et Ioannis Gidaris. « Natural Hazard Probabilistic Risk Assessment Through Surrogate Modeling ». Dans Multi-hazard Approaches to Civil Infrastructure Engineering, 59–86. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29713-2_4.
Texte intégralBignami, Daniele Fabrizio. « Auditing and Analytical Procedure for Risk Indices Assessment ». Dans Towards a Territorial Multi-Disaster Buildings’ Resistance Certification, 79–117. Milano : Springer Milan, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5223-9_4.
Texte intégralTsakovski, Stefan, et Vasil Simeonov. « Hasse Diagram Technique Contributions to Environmental Risk Assessment ». Dans Multi-indicator Systems and Modelling in Partial Order, 293–313. New York, NY : Springer New York, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8223-9_14.
Texte intégralActes de conférences sur le sujet "Multi risk assessment"
Zhang, L. M., et S. Zhang. « Approaches to Multi-Hazard Landslide Risk Assessment ». Dans Geo-Risk 2017. Reston, VA : American Society of Civil Engineers, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/9780784480731.025.
Texte intégralSmagin, A. A., P. V. Bulychev, L. P. Suitkina, D. V. Khabarov et M. V. Kochetkova. « Risk assessment in anesthesiology ». Dans 2017 International Multi-Conference on Engineering, Computer and Information Sciences (SIBIRCON). IEEE, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/sibircon.2017.8109943.
Texte intégralSchorner, Philip, Daniel Grimm et J. Marius Zollner. « Towards Multi-Modal Risk Assessment ». Dans 2022 International Conference on Electrical, Computer, Communications and Mechatronics Engineering (ICECCME). IEEE, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iceccme55909.2022.9988483.
Texte intégralSyrovatkin, Alexander. « Risk Assessment In Multi-period Models ». Dans 2018 Eleventh International Conference "Management of large-scale system development" (MLSD 2018). IEEE, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mlsd.2018.8551809.
Texte intégralAvdeenko, T. V., M. A. Vasiljev et J. O. Mamenko. « Intelligent Technologies in the Problem of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making on Field Tax Audit ». Dans Advances in Management Science and Risk Assessment. Calgary,AB,Canada : ACTAPRESS, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.2316/p.2011.704-037.
Texte intégral« Controlled Environments For Cyber Risk Assessment Of Cyber-Physical Systems ». Dans 2017 Summer Simulation Multi-Conference. Society for Modeling and Simulation International (SCS), 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.22360/summersim.2017.scsc.003.
Texte intégralMohammadian, Masoud. « Network Security Risk Assessment Using Intelligent Agents ». Dans 2018 International Symposium on Agent, Multi-Agent Systems and Robotics (ISAMSR). IEEE, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/isamsr.2018.8540557.
Texte intégralALBULESCU, ANDRA-COSMINA, DANIELA LARION et ADRIAN GROZAVU. « MULTI-CRITERIA ASSESSMENT OF THE SEISMIC VULNERABILITY OF SCHOOL UNITS IN VASLUI CITY, ROMANIA ». Dans RISK ANALYSIS 2020. Southampton UK : WIT Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/risk200021.
Texte intégralKobzili, Elhaouari, Cherif Larbes, Billel Kellalib, Fethi Demim, Ahmed Allam et Abdelghani Boucheloukh. « Multi Sensor Data Fusion With Risk Assessment ». Dans 2019 International Conference on Advanced Electrical Engineering (ICAEE). IEEE, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icaee47123.2019.9015084.
Texte intégralXie Hui Li et Lei Wang. « Regional ecological risk assessment of multi-sources ». Dans 2011 International Symposium on Water Resource and Environmental Protection (ISWREP). IEEE, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iswrep.2011.5893452.
Texte intégralRapports d'organisations sur le sujet "Multi risk assessment"
Coleman, Justin L., Chandu Bolisetti, Swetha Veeraraghavan, Carlo Parisi, Steven R. Prescott et Abhinav Gupta. Multi-Hazard Advanced Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment Tools and Applications. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), septembre 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1369534.
Texte intégralAhmadalipour, Ali. Multi-dimensional Drought Risk Assessment based on Socio-economic Vulnerabilities and Hydro-Climatological Factors. Portland State University Library, janvier 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/etd.5922.
Texte intégralSett, Dominic, Florian Waldschmidt, Alvaro Rojas-Ferreira, Saut Sagala, Teresa Arce Mojica, Preeti Koirala, Patrick Sanady et al. Climate and disaster risk analytics tool for adaptive social protection. United Nations University - Institute for Environment and Human Security, mars 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.53324/wnsg2302.
Texte intégralZareian, Farzin, et Joel Lanning. Development of Testing Protocol for Cripple Wall Components (PEER-CEA Project). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, novembre 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.55461/olpv6741.
Texte intégralSaha, Amrita, Marco Carreras et John Thompson. A Multi-Phase Assessment of the Effects of COVID-19 on Food Systems and Rural Livelihoods in Sub-Saharan Africa. APRA, Future Agricultures Consortium, avril 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/apra.2022.011.
Texte intégralThomas, Sandy, Peter Gregory, Sarah O’Brien, Catriona McCallion, Ben Goodall, Chun-Han Chan et Paul Nunn. Rapid Evidence Review 1 on the Critical Appraisal of Third-Party Evidence. Food Standards Agency, juin 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.46756/sci.fsa.elm525.
Texte intégralSchiller, Brandon, Tara Hutchinson et Kelly Cobeen. Cripple Wall Small-Component Test Program : Wet Specimens I (PEER-CEA Project). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, novembre 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.55461/dqhf2112.
Texte intégralSchiller, Brandon, Tara Hutchinson et Kelly Cobeen. Cripple Wall Small-Component Test Program : Wet Specimens II (PEER-CEA Project). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, novembre 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.55461/ldbn4070.
Texte intégralSalavisa, Isabel, Mark Soares et Sofia Bizarro. A Critical Assessment of Organic Agriculture in Portugal : A reflection on the agro-food system transition. DINÂMIA'CET-Iscte, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.15847/dinamiacet-iul.wp.2021.05.
Texte intégralMazzoni, Silvia, Nicholas Gregor, Linda Al Atik, Yousef Bozorgnia, David Welch et Gregory Deierlein. Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis and Selecting and Scaling of Ground-Motion Records (PEER-CEA Project). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, novembre 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.55461/zjdn7385.
Texte intégral