Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « Midbodt Remnant »

Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres

Choisissez une source :

Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « Midbodt Remnant ».

À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.

Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.

Articles de revues sur le sujet "Midbodt Remnant"

1

McDougall, Alex, Celine Hebras, Gerard Pruliere, David Burgess, Vlad Costache, Remi Dumollard et Janet Chenevert. « Role of PB1 Midbody Remnant Creating Tethered Polar Bodies during Meiosis II ». Genes 11, no 12 (24 novembre 2020) : 1394. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11121394.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Polar body (PB) formation is an extreme form of unequal cell division that occurs in oocytes due to the eccentric position of the small meiotic spindle near the oocyte cortex. Prior to PB formation, a chromatin-centered process causes the cortex overlying the meiotic chromosomes to become polarized. This polarized cortical subdomain marks the site where a cortical protrusion or outpocket forms at the oocyte surface creating the future PBs. Using ascidians, we observed that PB1 becomes tethered to the fertilized egg via PB2, indicating that the site of PB1 cytokinesis directed the precise site for PB2 emission. We therefore studied whether the midbody remnant left behind following PB1 emission was involved, together with the egg chromatin, in defining the precise cortical site for PB2 emission. During outpocketing of PB2 in ascidians, we discovered that a small structure around 1 µm in diameter protruded from the cortical outpocket that will form the future PB2, which we define as the “polar corps”. As emission of PB2 progressed, this small polar corps became localized between PB2 and PB1 and appeared to link PB2 to PB1. We tested the hypothesis that this small polar corps on the surface of the forming PB2 outpocket was the midbody remnant from the previous round of PB1 cytokinesis. We had previously discovered that Plk1::Ven labeled midbody remnants in ascidian embryos. We therefore used Plk1::Ven to follow the dynamics of the PB1 midbody remnant during meiosis II. Plk1::Ven strongly labeled the small polar corps that formed on the surface of the cortical outpocket that created PB2. Following emission of PB2, this polar corps was rich in Plk1::Ven and linked PB2 to PB1. By labelling actin (with TRITC-Phalloidin) we also demonstrated that actin accumulates at the midbody remnant and also forms a cortical cap around the midbody remnant in meiosis II that prefigured the precise site of cortical outpocketing during PB2 emission. Phalloidin staining of actin and immunolabelling of anti-phospho aPKC during meiosis II in fertilized eggs that had PB1 removed suggested that the midbody remnant remained within the fertilized egg following emission of PB1. Dynamic imaging of microtubules labelled with Ens::3GFP, MAP7::GFP or EB3::3GFP showed that one pole of the second meiotic spindle was located near the midbody remnant while the other pole rotated away from the cortex during outpocketing. Finally, we report that failure of the second meiotic spindle to rotate can lead to the formation of two cortical outpockets at anaphase II, one above each set of chromatids. It is not known whether the midbody remnant of PB1 is involved in directing the precise location of PB2 since our data are correlative in ascidians. However, a review of the literature indicates that PB1 is tethered to the egg surface via PB2 in several species including members of the cnidarians, lophotrochozoa and echinoids, suggesting that the midbody remnant formed during PB1 emission may be involved in directing the precise site of PB2 emission throughout the invertebrates.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Bernabé-Rubio, Miguel, Germán Andrés, Javier Casares-Arias, Jaime Fernández-Barrera, Laura Rangel, Natalia Reglero-Real, David C. Gershlick et al. « Novel role for the midbody in primary ciliogenesis by polarized epithelial cells ». Journal of Cell Biology 214, no 3 (25 juillet 2016) : 259–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201601020.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
The primary cilium is a membrane protrusion that is crucial for vertebrate tissue homeostasis and development. Here, we investigated the uncharacterized process of primary ciliogenesis in polarized epithelial cells. We show that after cytokinesis, the midbody is inherited by one of the daughter cells as a remnant that initially locates peripherally at the apical surface of one of the daughter cells. The remnant then moves along the apical surface and, once proximal to the centrosome at the center of the apical surface, enables cilium formation. The physical removal of the remnant greatly impairs ciliogenesis. We developed a probabilistic cell population–based model that reproduces the experimental data. In addition, our model explains, solely in terms of cell area constraints, the various observed transitions of the midbody, the beginning of ciliogenesis, and the accumulation of ciliated cells. Our findings reveal a biological mechanism that links the three microtubule-based organelles—the midbody, the centrosome, and the cilium—in the same cellular process.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
3

Singh, Deepika, et Christian Pohl. « A function for the midbody remnant in embryonic patterning ». Communicative & ; Integrative Biology 7, no 3 (3 avril 2014) : e28533. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cib.28533.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
4

Ott, Carolyn M. « Midbody remnant licenses primary cilia formation in epithelial cells ». Journal of Cell Biology 214, no 3 (1 août 2016) : 237–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201607046.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Tethered midbody remnants dancing across apical microvilli, encountering the centrosome, and beckoning forth a cilium—who would have guessed this is how polarized epithelial cells coordinate the end of mitosis and the beginning of ciliogenesis? New evidence from Bernabé-Rubio et al. (2016. J. Cell Biol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201601020) supports this emerging model.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
5

McNeely, Katrina C., et Noelle D. Dwyer. « Cytokinesis and postabscission midbody remnants are regulated during mammalian brain development ». Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, no 17 (9 avril 2020) : 9584–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1919658117.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Building a brain of the proper size and structure requires neural stem cells (NSCs) to divide with tight temporal and spatial control to produce different daughter cell types in proper numbers and sequence. Mammalian NSCs in the embryonic cortex must maintain their polarized epithelial structure as they undergo both early proliferative divisions and later neurogenic divisions. To do this, they undergo a polarized form of cytokinesis at the apical membrane that is not well understood. Here, we investigate whether polarized furrowing and abscission in mouse NSCs are regulated differently at earlier and later stages and in a cytokinesis mutant, Kif20b. This mutant was previously shown to have microcephaly and elevated apoptosis of NSCs. We developed methods to live image furrow ingression and midbody abscission in NSCs within cortical explants. We find that polarized furrow ingression occurs at a steady rate and completes in ∼15 min at two different ages. However, ingression is slower in a subset of Kif20b mutant NSCs. Abscission is usually observed on both sides of the midbody and takes 65 to 75 min to complete. Surprisingly, abscission is accelerated in the Kif20b mutant NSCs. Postabscission midbody remnants are observed at the apical membranes of daughter cells and are much more abundant in early-stage cortices. After NSC divisions in vitro, midbody remnants are more often retained on the daughter cells of early proliferative divisions. Altogether, these results suggest that regulation of abscission timing and midbody remnants in embryonic NSCs may influence proper brain growth and structure.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
6

Schink, Kay O., et Harald Stenmark. « Cell Differentiation : Midbody Remnants — Junk or Fate Factors ? » Current Biology 21, no 23 (décembre 2011) : R958—R960. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.035.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
7

Crowell, E. F., A. L. Gaffuri, B. Gayraud-Morel, S. Tajbakhsh et A. Echard. « Engulfment of the midbody remnant after cytokinesis in mammalian cells ». Journal of Cell Science 127, no 17 (7 juillet 2014) : 3840–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.154732.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
8

Casares-Arias, Javier, María Ujué González, Alvaro San Paulo, Leandro N. Ventimiglia, Jessica B. A. Sadler, David G. Miguez, Leticia Labat-de-Hoz et al. « Midbody Remnant Inheritance Is Regulated by the ESCRT Subunit CHMP4C ». iScience 23, no 6 (juin 2020) : 101244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101244.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
9

Khripkov, I. S., et A. A. Golikova. « The remnant of the midbody as a cellular signaling mechanism ». Morphologia 18, no 1 (29 avril 2024) : 19–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.26641/1997-9665.2024.1.19-25.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Cell signaling mechanisms are the basis for intercellular integration and regulation of proliferation and differentiation processes at the systemic level. One of the most plausible ways to control cell-to-cell interaction and targeted distribution of genetic information is for cells to use their own structures that are formed during mitosis and carry RNA-dependent signaling molecules that affect the mechanisms of control of intercellular interaction, cell proliferation and differentiation. The midbody remnant is a microtubule-rich structure that forms between dividing cells in the last stages of cytokinesis. Previously, it was thought to be only a temporary structure of the intercellular bridge during cytokinesis, which served to connect two future daughter cells. This structure is a key regulator of abscission and functions as a signaling platform that coordinates the cytoskeleton and endosomal dynamics during the terminal stages of cell division. The midbody is a subcellular structure that is formed during cell division, during penetration into the cleavage sulcus, when the microtubules of the central spindle are compacted and cross-linked by a thin intracellular bridge connecting the two daughter cells. The midbody plays a key role in organizing cytokinesis by recruiting a variety of mitotic kinases such as Aurora B and Plk1, as well as sulcus endosomes containing Rab11/FIP3, the membrane-rupturing ESCRT complex and the microtubule-rupturing enzyme spastin, all of which are responsible for mediated rupture during the later stages of cytokinesis. The midbodies can serve as extracellular and intracellular polarity signals during early embryogenesis, as well as during epithelialization and polarization of neurons. The molecular mechanism that governs the positioning of the middle body and how it transmits signals to neurons during differentiation or epithelium remains unknown. Importantly, the remains of the middle bodies can also function as intracellular signaling scaffolds that regulate proliferation and fate postmitotic cells. Since these structures can be released outside cells and taken up by other non-mitotic cells, it is suggested that they may function as vehicles for alternative transmission of complex sets of signaling molecules and/or receptors between cells, thus profoundly affecting signaling in general.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
10

Crowell, Elizabeth Faris, Jean-Yves Tinevez et Arnaud Echard. « A simple model for the fate of the cytokinesis midbody remnant : Implications for remnant degradation by autophagy ». BioEssays 35, no 5 (1 mars 2013) : 472–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.201200132.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

Chapitres de livres sur le sujet "Midbodt Remnant"

1

Pohl, Christian. « The Midbody and its Remnant in Cell Polarization and Asymmetric Cell Division ». Dans Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation, 165–82. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53150-2_7.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Frémont, S., et A. Echard. « Studying cytokinesis and midbody remnants using correlative light/scanning EM ». Dans Methods in Cell Biology, 239–51. Elsevier, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.mcb.2016.03.028.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Nous offrons des réductions sur tous les plans premium pour les auteurs dont les œuvres sont incluses dans des sélections littéraires thématiques. Contactez-nous pour obtenir un code promo unique!

Vers la bibliographie