Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « Major Hazard Facilities »
Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres
Sommaire
Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « Major Hazard Facilities ».
À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.
Articles de revues sur le sujet "Major Hazard Facilities"
Belokon, S. A., V. V. Vasil’ev, Yu N. Zolotukhin, A. S. Maltsev, M. A. Sobolev, M. N. Filippov et A. P. Yan. « Automated supervisory control systems for major hazard facilities ». Optoelectronics, Instrumentation and Data Processing 47, no 3 (juin 2011) : 264–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.3103/s8756699011030095.
Texte intégralFilippin, Katherine (Kate), et Lachlan Dreher. « Major hazard risk assessment for existing and new facilities ». Process Safety Progress 23, no 4 (2004) : 237–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prs.10045.
Texte intégralVandenberg, Erik. « Improving process safety for the operation of Major Hazard Facilities ». APPEA Journal 63, no 2 (11 mai 2023) : S332—S336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/aj22041.
Texte intégralPearce, Andrew, David G. E. Caldicott, Nicholas A. Edwards et Tony Eliseo. « Medical Awareness and Response to Incidents at Major Hazard Facilities ». Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 17, S2 (décembre 2002) : S83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1049023x00011122.
Texte intégralKwag, Shinyoung, Jeong Gon Ha, Min Kyu Kim et Jung Han Kim. « Development of Efficient External Multi-Hazard Risk Quantification Methodology for Nuclear Facilities ». Energies 12, no 20 (16 octobre 2019) : 3925. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en12203925.
Texte intégralJohari, K. A., et A. Ramli. « Major Accident Hazard in Bioprocess Facilities : A Challenge To Sustainable Industrial Development ». IOP Conference Series : Materials Science and Engineering 736 (5 mars 2020) : 022005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/736/2/022005.
Texte intégralChoi, Eujeong, Shinyoung Kwag, Jeong-Gon Ha et Daegi Hahm. « Development of a Two-Stage DQFM to Improve Efficiency of Single- and Multi-Hazard Risk Quantification for Nuclear Facilities ». Energies 14, no 4 (15 février 2021) : 1017. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en14041017.
Texte intégralSimpson, Melinda, et Neil Tooley. « Setting up for success for mobilisation to major hazard facilities—a contractor's perspective ». APPEA Journal 55, no 2 (2015) : 422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/aj14057.
Texte intégralKim, Beom-Jin, Minkyu Kim, Daegi Hahm, Junhee Park et Kun-Yeun Han. « Probabilistic Flood Assessment Methodology for Nuclear Power Plants Considering Extreme Rainfall ». Energies 14, no 9 (1 mai 2021) : 2600. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en14092600.
Texte intégralNdejjo, Rawlance, Geofrey Musinguzi, Xiaozhong Yu, Esther Buregyeya, David Musoke, Jia-Sheng Wang, Abdullah Ali Halage et al. « Occupational Health Hazards among Healthcare Workers in Kampala, Uganda ». Journal of Environmental and Public Health 2015 (2015) : 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/913741.
Texte intégralThèses sur le sujet "Major Hazard Facilities"
Tannous, Scarlett. « An integrated framework to assess the “effectiveness” of risk-related public policies for high-risk chemical and petrochemical sites : A comparative study in France and Australia ». Electronic Thesis or Diss., Université Paris sciences et lettres, 2023. https://basepub.dauphine.fr/discover?query=%222023UPSLD034%22.
Texte intégralHigh-risk industrial sites (e.g., Seveso Upper Tier (UT) and Major Hazard Facilities (MHF)) are classified by legislation and regulations as the most dangerous sites. In other words, in case of a major accident, damage can be significant even if it is supposed to occur rarely. Risk prevention and crisis management policies are one way to prevent that while sustaining the economic vitality of the industrial sector. These trade-offs constitute a major challenge for governments and public actors, who have a primary role in protecting their citizens and improving their social well-being by taking political decisions and developing “effective” risk prevention and crisis management policies.How can we assess such policy “effectiveness” and what does it mean? Ultimately, a risk policy must reduce risks and prevent major accidents (e.g., efficacy), but what other aspects condition such performativity? Some answers to these multidisciplinary questions can be found in public administration, management and decision sciences, risk, safety, and regulatory research areas. Under the public policy dimension, studies emphasize gaps related to (i) the role of effective risk governance and (ii) the central role of inspection, oversight, or monitoring performance, which is often overlooked despite its importance. The objective of this thesis is, therefore, to answer with a bottom-up approach the following research question: How can the “risk policy system” around high-risk sites be assessed for an effective decision process taking into consideration the territorial levels such as the Regional level for France and the State level for Australia?Based on qualitative approaches, this thesis aims to propose a multicriteria assessment framework serving conceptual thinking and problem framing for risk policy assessment. It suggests embracing the complexity of a system that combines (i) an organizational and governance system, (ii) a regulatory or normative system, and (iii) a system of practical tools/instruments. The assessment framework is also tested through two qualitative case studies in the Normandy Region (France) and the State of Victoria (Australia), which are both areas where a significant number of high-risk facilities exist.Main contributions include (i) an assessment framework of more than ten criteria coupled with practical questions adapted to the contexts of high-risk industrial sites. They include conditions for legitimacy and validity such as efficacy, transparency, adequacy, and so on; and (ii) two in-depth descriptive assessments of the Normand and Victorian risk policy systems allow us to deduce some main variabilities in their system’s effectiveness. Some limitations appear to concern generalization, scoping, and representativity aspects. Future work encourages testing this framework on other cases, exploring the groups of facilities at the legislative and regulatory boundaries, examining the inter-relationships and dependencies between criteria, and exploring the aggregation methods that can serve the formalization of this framework
Livres sur le sujet "Major Hazard Facilities"
Hawley, Mark, et John Cunning, dir. Guidelines for Mine Waste Dump and Stockpile Design. CSIRO Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/9781486303519.
Texte intégralChapitres de livres sur le sujet "Major Hazard Facilities"
Hunt, R. J. « Major Changes in Spectral Shapes for Critical Facilities in Central and Eastern United States ». Dans Seismic Hazard Design Issues in the Central United States, 91–100. Reston, VA : American Society of Civil Engineers, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/9780784413203.ch07.
Texte intégralAmendola, Aniello. « Risk Assessment Within the Control Process of Major Accident Hazards ». Dans Environmental Aspects of Converting CW Facilities to Peaceful Purposes, 223–40. Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0508-1_21.
Texte intégral« Management of Major Hazard Facilities ». Dans Process Systems Risk Management, 515–50. Elsevier, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1874-5970(05)80015-3.
Texte intégralVuillaume, P. « Explosive facilities – a major hazard in urban areas ». Dans Explosives and Blasting Technique, 73–78. Taylor & Francis, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781439833476.ch9.
Texte intégralShrader-Frechette, Kristin. « Reductionist Approaches to Risk ». Dans Acceptable Evidence. Oxford University Press, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195089295.003.0018.
Texte intégralMiller, Harvey J., et Shih-Lung Shaw. « Transportation, Environment, and Hazards ». Dans Geographic Information Systems for Transportation, 341–79. Oxford University PressNew York, NY, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195123944.003.0010.
Texte intégralBuck, S. « Decommissioning nuclear facilities ». Dans The Nuclear Fuel Cycle from Ore to Wastes, 229–51. Oxford University PressOxford, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198565406.003.0012.
Texte intégralSharp, John V., Mamdouh Salama, Gerhard Ersdal et Alexander Stacey. « Life Extension and Integrity Management of Ageing Pipelines ». Dans Ageing and Life Extension of Offshore Facilities, 233–39. ASME, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.885789_ch17.
Texte intégral« Mitigating Impacts of Natural Hazards on Fishery Ecosystems ». Dans Mitigating Impacts of Natural Hazards on Fishery Ecosystems, sous la direction de Michael S. Spranger et Donald L. Jackson. American Fisheries Society, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.47886/9781934874011.ch14.
Texte intégralOluwagbemi, Olugbenga Oluseun, Synora Barretto et Omowunmi Isafiade. « NOVESHIA : Novel Smart Health Informatics Architecture to Cater for the Emotional and Mental Wellbeing of England NHS Workers in the United Kingdom ». Dans Intelligent Environments 2024 : Combined Proceedings of Workshops and Demos & ; Videos Session. IOS Press, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/aise240016.
Texte intégralActes de conférences sur le sujet "Major Hazard Facilities"
Guinard, L., S. Parey, H. Cordier et L. Grammosenis. « Impact of Climate Change on EDF’s Nuclear Facilities : Climate Watch Approach ». Dans 2020 International Conference on Nuclear Engineering collocated with the ASME 2020 Power Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/icone2020-16186.
Texte intégralBlyukher, Boris. « Safety Analysis and Risk Assessment for Pressure Systems ». Dans ASME 2003 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. ASMEDC, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/pvp2003-1921.
Texte intégralButenweg, Christoph, Oreste S. Bursi, Chiara Nardin, Igor Lanese, Alberto Pavese, Marko Marinković, Fabrizio Paolacci et Gianluca Quinci. « Experimental Investigation on the Seismic Performance of a Multi-Component System for Major-Hazard Industrial Facilities ». Dans ASME 2021 Pressure Vessels & Piping Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/pvp2021-61696.
Texte intégralDecarli, Luca, Anna Crivellari, Laura La Rosa, Enrico Zio, Francesco Di Maio, Oscar Scapinello et Luca Martinoia. « Multihazard Risk Aggregation Approach for Quantitative Risk Assessment of Upstream Oil and Gas Facilities ». Dans Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference. SPE, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/207276-ms.
Texte intégralSteele, John L., et Evaristo J. Bonano. « Web-Based Risk and Hazard Identification and Screening ». Dans ASME 2000 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/imece2000-1027.
Texte intégralCorrales, Julian Javier, Hugo Alberto García, Mauricio Gallego Silva et Elkin Gerardo Avila. « Study for the Determination of Seismic Hazard for the Ocensa Oil Pipeline ». Dans ASME 2015 International Pipeline Geotechnical Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/ipg2015-8538.
Texte intégralHan, Dae Suk, Gyusung Kim, Woo Seung Sim, Young Sik Jang et Hyun Soo Shin. « Practical Considerations for the Structural Analysis of Offshore Topside Structures Under Gas Explosion Accidents ». Dans ASME 2012 31st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/omae2012-83667.
Texte intégralForsberg, C. W., M. Gorensek, S. Herring et P. Pickard. « Safety Related Physical Phenomena for Coupled High-Temperature Reactors and Hydrogen Production Facilities ». Dans Fourth International Topical Meeting on High Temperature Reactor Technology. ASMEDC, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/htr2008-58223.
Texte intégralMinagawa, Keisuke, et Fabrizio Paolacci. « Passive Control Techniques for Seismic Protection of Chemical Plants ». Dans ASME 2020 Pressure Vessels & Piping Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/pvp2020-21226.
Texte intégralBragatto, Paolo, Corrado Delle Site, Maria Francesca Milazzo, Annalisa Pirone et Maria Rosaria Vallerotonda. « Managing Pressure Equipment Aging in Plants With Major Accident Hazard : A Methodology Satisfying the Requirements of the European Directive 2012/18/UE Seveso III ». Dans ASME 2018 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/pvp2018-84687.
Texte intégralRapports d'organisations sur le sujet "Major Hazard Facilities"
Motamed, Ramin, David McCallen et Swasti Saxena. An International Workshop on Large-Scale Shake Table Testing for the Assessment of Soil-Foundation-Structure System Response for Seismic Safety of DOE Nuclear Facilities, A Virtual Workshop – 17-18 May 2021. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, février 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.55461/jjvo9762.
Texte intégral