Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « Labour surplus villages »
Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres
Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « Labour surplus villages ».
À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.
Articles de revues sur le sujet "Labour surplus villages"
Singh Rajput, Arjun, Latika Sharma, P. S. Shekhawat et Vikash Pawariya. « Estimation of seasonal surplus labour in agriculture in different agro-climatic regions of Rajasthan ». Environment Conservation Journal 23, no 1&2 (1 février 2022) : 55–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.36953/ecj.021873-2142.
Texte intégralXolmuminov, Sh. « FUNDAMENTALS OF HR MARKETING RESEARCH OF THE RURAL LABOUR MARKET IN LABOUR-SURPLUS REGIONS ». Journal of Science and Innovative Development 4, no 3 (30 juin 2021) : 5–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.36522/2181-9637-2021-3-1.
Texte intégralLopez-Alonso, Rocío Hiraldo. « Value is Still Labour : Exploitation and the Production of Environmental Rent and Commodities for Nature Tourists in Rural Senegal ». Human Geography 10, no 2 (juillet 2017) : 54–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/194277861701000204.
Texte intégralSINGH, K. M., R. K. P. SINGH, ANJANI KUMAR, ABHAY KUMAR, M. S. MEENA et V. P. CHAHAL. « Implications of labour migration for rice production and household economy : Evidences from eastern India ». Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 85, no 6 (5 juin 2015) : 768–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i6.49191.
Texte intégralDipankar De. « Surplus Crop Residues for Energy Generation in Selected Districts of Madhya Pradesh - An Assessment ». Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India) 45, no 4 (31 décembre 2008) : 50–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.52151/jae2008454.1351.
Texte intégralSHUKLA, ADITYA, et Ramchandra Ramchandra. « A Study on Economics of Marketing and Production of Aonla in District Pratapgarh (U.P.) ». International Journal of Advances in Agricultural Science and Technology 8, no 9 (30 septembre 2021) : 142–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.47856/ijaast.2021.v08i9.016.
Texte intégralSelden, Mark. « Jack Gray, Mao Zedong and the Political Economy of Chinese Development ». China Quarterly 187 (septembre 2006) : 680–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0305741006000300.
Texte intégralYi, Pan, Li Xin et Sheng Yu Guo. « Thinking of Village Construction in Central Region under the Context of Labor Migration ». Applied Mechanics and Materials 507 (janvier 2014) : 666–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.507.666.
Texte intégralYang, Yang, Hua Li, Zhen Liu, Long Cheng, Assem Abu Hatab et Jing Lan. « Effect of Forestland Property Rights and Village Off-Farm Environment on Off-Farm Employment in Southern China ». Sustainability 12, no 7 (25 mars 2020) : 2605. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12072605.
Texte intégralYdyrys, S. S., R. K. Niyazbekova et S. A. Ilasheva. « State regulation of labor market in labor-surplus rural regions of Kazakhstan ». Problems of AgriMarket, no 4 (15 décembre 2022) : 179–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.46666/2022-4.2708-9991.19.
Texte intégralThèses sur le sujet "Labour surplus villages"
Datta, Pradip Kumar. « Mobilising the basic resources in a set of labour surplus villages ». Thesis, University of North Bengal, 1996. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/214.
Texte intégralLivres sur le sujet "Labour surplus villages"
Toulmin, Camilla. Cattle, Women, and Wells. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198853046.001.0001.
Texte intégralChapitres de livres sur le sujet "Labour surplus villages"
Edwards, Jeanette. « In-Migration and Out-Migration ». Dans Born and Bred, 76–104. Oxford University PressOxford, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198233947.003.0004.
Texte intégralBrødsgaard, Kjeld Erik, et Kamal Sheel. « Informalization and Growth : the Political Economy of Local Enterprises ». Dans State Capacity in East Asia, 203–35. Oxford University PressOxford, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198297635.003.0010.
Texte intégralLander, Brian. « The Nature of Political Power ». Dans The King's Harvest, 14–31. Yale University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300255089.003.0002.
Texte intégralPallot, Judith, et Tat'yana Nefedova. « Household Food Production—What Next ? » Dans Russia's Unknown Agriculture. Oxford University Press, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199227419.003.0015.
Texte intégral« subsistence production (where in the colonial period mainly extra-economic factors such as forced cultivation or forced labour caused the integration of the peasantry in the market exchange). Socialist development was there-fore strongly identified with modernising through the rapid expansion of the state sector, that is, nationalisation and mechanisation on an ever-increasing scale. The peasantry would be gradually absorbed within this expanding sector, and hence, at first, the role of the peasantry was seen as essentially passive with its transformation mainly centring on social aspects. As such, the policy of communal villages became virtually a habitational concept (and was in actual fact the responsibility of the national directorate of housing) : a question of social infrastructures (water supplies, schools, etc.) within a concept of communal life without concerning production and its transformation. This view conflicted heavily with the objective conditions in the rural areas characterised by a deep involvement of the peasantry in market relationships and their dependence on it either as suppliers of labour power or as cash crop producers. This contradiction became more obvious, when the balance of payments became a real constraint (in 1979) and, hence, the question of financing accumulation cropped up more strongly in practice. The peasantry as suppliers of cash crops, of food and of labour power to the state sectors occupied a crucial position in production and accumulation. However, the crucial question then becomes whether the peasantry only performs the role of supplying part of the accumulation fund or whether the peasantry itself is part and parcel of the process of transformation and hence that accumulation embraces as an integral part the transformation of peasant agriculture into more socialised forms of production. In other words, it poses the question whether the strategy is based on a primitive socialist accumulation on the basis of the peasantry (transferring the agrarian surplus to the develop-ment of the state sector), or whether accumulation includes the transformation of peasant agriculture. Clearly, the way this question is posed in practice will influence heavily the nature of the organisation of the exchange between the state sector and the peasantry. The proposition that the state sector can develop under its own steam (with or without the aid of external borrowing) cannot bypass this crucial question since, on the one hand, a considerable part of foreign exchange earnings and of the food supply to the towns depended on peasant production and, on the other, the very conditions of productivity and profitability in the agrarian state sector depended heavily on the organic link that existed.between labour supply and family agriculture. The monetary disequilibrium originating from the state sector has a severe impact on the organisation of the exchange between the state sector and the peasantry. First, the imbalance between the demand for and the supply of consumer commodities affected rural areas differently from urban areas. The reason was that in urban areas the rationing system guaranteed to each family a minimum quantity of basic consumer necessities at official prices. In the rural areas the principal form of rationing remained the queue ! Hence, forced savings were distributed differently over urban and rural areas. Furthermore, the concentration of resources on the state sector also implied that the peasants' ». Dans The Agrarian Question in Socialist Transitions, 205. Routledge, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203043493-29.
Texte intégral