Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « Knowability »
Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres
Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « Knowability ».
À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.
Articles de revues sur le sujet "Knowability"
Wójcik, Arkadiusz. « The Knowability Paradox and Unsuccessful Updates ». Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 62, no 1 (1 juin 2020) : 53–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2020-0013.
Texte intégralWilliamson, Timothy. « Knowability and Constructivism ». Philosophical Quarterly 38, no 153 (octobre 1988) : 422. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2219707.
Texte intégralJago, M. « Closure on knowability ». Analysis 70, no 4 (24 août 2010) : 648–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/analys/anq067.
Texte intégralChalmers, D. J. « Actuality and knowability ». Analysis 71, no 3 (18 mai 2011) : 411–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/analys/anr038.
Texte intégralDouven, Igor. « The Knowability Paradox ». Ars Disputandi 6, no 1 (janvier 2006) : 163–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15665399.2006.10819919.
Texte intégralWilliamson, Timothy. « Definiteness and Knowability ». Southern Journal of Philosophy 33, S1 (mars 1995) : 171–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.1995.tb00769.x.
Texte intégralDeVidi, David, et Tim Kenyon. « Analogues of Knowability ». Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81, no 4 (décembre 2003) : 481–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713659757.
Texte intégralHand, Michael, et Jonathan L. Kvanvig. « Tennant on knowability ». Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77, no 4 (décembre 1999) : 422–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00048409912349191.
Texte intégralHeylen, Jan, et Felipe Morales Carbonell. « Concepts of Knowability ». Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso, no 23 (26 décembre 2023) : 287–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.22370/rhv2023iss23pp287-308.
Texte intégralMurzi, Julien. « Knowability and bivalence : intuitionistic solutions to the Paradox of Knowability ». Philosophical Studies 149, no 2 (19 février 2009) : 269–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-009-9349-y.
Texte intégralThèses sur le sujet "Knowability"
Percival, P. R. « Infinity, knowability and understanding ». Thesis, University of Cambridge, 1986. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.384322.
Texte intégralKubyshkina, Ekaterina. « La logique de l'agent rationnel ». Thesis, Paris 1, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018PA01H208.
Texte intégralMany-valued logics is a family of non-classical logics, which is characterized by the fundamental fact that they do not restrict the truth values to only truth and falsity. According to this line of inquiry, Kleene (1938) constructed a logic that is based on the idea that every proposition is either true, or false, but there exist propositions for which the truth value is unknown. The formalisation of this idea leads to the introduction of a third assignment of truth value to propositions, interpreted as “unknown”. However, this formalisation contains an ambiguity, because it does not permit the resolution of a contradiction between the fact that every proposition is either true or false, and the fact that there exist propositions for which the assignment of truth value is neither “true” nor “false”. The initial aim of the present thesis is to explore Kleene’s idea in order to introduce and analyse a new many-valued logic, to be called the logic of a rational agent, that is founded on Kleene’s ideas, but that eliminates the above-mentioned ambiguity.The logic of a rational agent models the reasoning of an agent, taking into account the knowledge (or ignorance) of the classical truth value of a proposition that the agent can have. On the technical level, we introduce diverse definitions of entailment relations and construct consistent and complete semantics on this base. We then show the interest inherent in such a formalisation, by proposing an application of this logic to a famous epistemological problem, known as the “knowability paradox”. On the epistemological level, the logic of a rational agent permits us to offer an analysis of the notion of ignorance, as understood independently from the notion of knowledge. Such a formalization
Liu, Mo. « Dynamic Epistemic Logic with Quantification And Normative Systems ». Electronic Thesis or Diss., Université de Lorraine, 2023. http://www.theses.fr/2023LORR0077.
Texte intégralWe live in a world where information is constantly being updated. Logics with dynamic operators are capable of reasoning about multi-agent information change. Dynamic epistemic logic is the logic of knowledge change. For example, in public announcement logic, an announcement restricts the domain to states where it is true to represent the consequences of knowledge change. A generalization of dynamic epistemic logic is the extension with quantification. It bridges an interesting gap between propositional modal logic and first-order logic in expressivity and decidability. Arbitrary public announcement logic extends public announcement logic by adding quantification over all announcements. It is more expressive than modal logics and public announcement logic, but undecidable. In this thesis, we propose some novel versions of arbitrary public announcement logic. Firstly, we can restrict the quantification from over all announcements to over subsets of them. To be specific, the announcements involved could use only a subset of all propositional variables or implied or implying a given formula. Even though these variants of arbitrary public announcement logic are still undecidable, we show there is an interesting hierarchy of relative expressivity of them. Another approach is based on the idea of packing operators together. Packed operators represent more complex notions and also restrict the expressivity of languages. The notion of "knowability'' can be interpreted as "there is a possible information change after which the agent knows something''. It is natural to represent by the package of a quantified dynamic operator and a epistemic operator. In this thesis, we propose logics of knowability using such packed operators. We show that if there is no restriction on announcements, then the logic of knowability is more expressive than public announcement logic, but undecidable; if we only quantify over boolean announcements, then the logic has the same expressivity as propositional modal logic. Besides the extension with quantification, in this thesis, we also combine dynamic epistemic logic with normative system. Arrow update logic contains modalities that specify which relations should be preserved after updating by source and target conditions. It is designed to reason about multi-agent belief change. We can also use it to represent the notion of "norm'' which regulates behaviors of agents in a consequential way. We propose normative arrow update logic which combines arrow update logic and normative temporal logic. It also concludes additive, multiplicative and sequential combination of norms. Normative arrow update logic can distinguish between static and dynamic ways to consider norms as dynamic epistemic logic. We show its relative expressivity with other related logics, its decidability, and complexity
Řičař, Jiří. « Otázka přirozené poznatelnosti Boha u Tomáše Akvinského a její recepce u vybraných současných autorů ». Master's thesis, 2016. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-348233.
Texte intégralLivres sur le sujet "Knowability"
Kvanvig, Jonathan L. The knowability paradox. New York : Oxford University Press Inc., 2006.
Trouver le texte intégralJoe, Salerno, dir. New essays on the knowability paradox. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2008.
Trouver le texte intégralPohle, Joseph. God : His knowability, essence, and attributes : a dogmatic treatise. St. Louis, Mo : B. Herder, 1985.
Trouver le texte intégralKennedy, Philip. Deus humanissimus : The knowability of God in the theology of Edward Schillebeeckx. Fribourg, Switzerland : University Press, 1993.
Trouver le texte intégralLipskiy, Boris, Stanislav Gusev, Grigoriy Tul'chinskiy et Boris Markov. Fundamentals of Philosophy. ru : INFRA-M Academic Publishing LLC., 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/1014627.
Texte intégralKvanvig, Jonathan L. Knowability Paradox. Oxford University Press, 2006.
Trouver le texte intégralKvanvig, Jonathan L. Knowability Paradox. Oxford University Press, 2008.
Trouver le texte intégralKvanvig, Jonathan L. Knowability Paradox. Oxford University Press, 2006.
Trouver le texte intégralSalerno, Joe, dir. New Essays on the Knowability Paradox. Oxford University Press, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199285495.001.0001.
Texte intégralPohle, Joseph. God : His Knowability, Essence And Attributes. Kessinger Publishing, LLC, 2007.
Trouver le texte intégralChapitres de livres sur le sujet "Knowability"
McCain, Kevin. « Knowability Paradox ». Dans Epistemology : 50 Puzzles, Paradoxes, and Thought Experiments, 231–34. New York : Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003121091-51.
Texte intégralUsberti, Gabriele. « The Paradox of Knowability ». Dans Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, 345–77. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24605-0_9.
Texte intégralWen, Xuefeng, Hu Liu et Fan Huang. « An Alternative Logic for Knowability ». Dans Logic, Rationality, and Interaction, 342–55. Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24130-7_25.
Texte intégralJohn, Maya. « (Un)Knowability of a Disease ». Dans Pandemic Perspectives, 23–45. London : Routledge, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003480297-3.
Texte intégralSalerno, Joe. « Knowability and a New Paradox of Happiness ». Dans Jaakko Hintikka on Knowledge and Game-Theoretical Semantics, 457–74. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62864-6_19.
Texte intégralvan Rooij, Robert. « Nonmonotonicity and Knowability : As Knowable as Possible ». Dans Outstanding Contributions to Logic, 53–65. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47843-2_3.
Texte intégralUsberti, Gabriele. « The Paradox of Knowability from an Intuitionistic Standpoint ». Dans Advances in Proof-Theoretic Semantics, 115–37. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22686-6_7.
Texte intégralCarrara, Massimiliano, Daniele Chiffi et Davide Sergio. « A Multimodal Pragmatic Analysis of the Knowability Paradox ». Dans Logic, Argumentation & ; Reasoning, 195–209. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58507-9_9.
Texte intégralCohen, Michael. « A Dynamic Epistemic Logic with a Knowability Principle ». Dans Logic, Rationality, and Interaction, 406–10. Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48561-3_33.
Texte intégralPrebble, Mark. « Public Value, Knowability, and Legitimacy : A Thought Experiment ». Dans Challenges to Public Value Creation, 99–107. Cham : Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46030-2_7.
Texte intégralActes de conférences sur le sujet "Knowability"
Baltag, Alexandru, Nick Bezhanishvili et David Fernández-Duque. « The Topology of Surprise ». Dans 19th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning {KR-2022}. California : International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/kr.2022/4.
Texte intégral