Bibliographies thématiques / Keynesian economics – History / Articles de revues
Pour voir les autres types de publications sur ce sujet consultez le lien suivant : Keynesian economics – History.

Articles de revues sur le sujet « Keynesian economics – History »

Auteur : Grafiati
Publié le 10 mars 2023
Mis à jour le 11 mars 2023

Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres

Choisissez une source :

Consultez les 50 meilleurs articles de revues pour votre recherche sur le sujet « Keynesian economics – History ».

À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.

Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.

Parcourez les articles de revues sur diverses disciplines et organisez correctement votre bibliographie.

1

Guizzo, Danielle. « Why does the history of economic thought neglect Post-Keynesian economics ? » Review of Keynesian Economics 8, no 1 (22 janvier 2020) : 119–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/roke.2020.01.09.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Despite receiving increased interest after the global financial crisis of 2007–2008 and consolidating itself as an established research program, Post-Keynesian economics remains under-represented within publications on the history of economics. When compared to other traditional heterodox approaches such as Marxist, Institutionalist, and Austrian economics, Post-Keynesian economics falls behind considerably, contradicting the Post-Keynesian appreciation for the history of the discipline. This article explores some reasons behind this detachment by considering two main factors: first, the recent disciplinary and institutional changes experienced by the history of economics in the last ten years; and, second, the recent ‘maturing state’ of Post-Keynesian economics and its unique treatment of the history of economic thought. The article concludes by suggesting a new research agenda for Post-Keynesianism, making use of the ‘applied’ turn proposed by the recent history of economic thought as one of the strategies for Post-Keynesians to engage with the economics discipline.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Kerr, Prue. « A history of post-Keynesian economics ». Cambridge Journal of Economics 29, no 3 (1 mai 2005) : 475–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cje/bei029.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
3

Biewener, C. « Post-Keynesian Monetary Economics ». History of Political Economy 20, no 1 (1 mars 1988) : 145–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-20-1-145.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
4

Bateman, B. W. « An Encyclopedia of Keynesian Economics ». History of Political Economy 31, no 3 (1 septembre 1999) : 601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-31-3-601.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
5

Bateman, B. W. « A History of Post Keynesian Economics since 1936 ». History of Political Economy 36, no 3 (1 septembre 2004) : 581–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-36-3-581.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
6

Ostapenko, V. M., et E. A. Buglevsky. « Money supply in the history of macroeconomic thought : 50 shades of endogeneity ». Journal of the New Economic Association 55, no 3 (2022) : 156–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2022-55-3-8.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
The paper considers the evolution of the money supply concept in economics through the lens of contemporary discussion on the degree of its endogeneity. It is stated that the model of exogenous money supply formation, widespread in the literature and actively criticized in recent decades, is an artifact of macroeconomic thought. Its dominance lasted a very short time period, and various forms of endogeneity were attributed to money supply much more often in the course of monetary theory development. Authors cover the debates between the currency and banking school in the XIX century, the birth of the theory of money multiplier, Keynes’ position, the monetarist view of money supply and its criticism by Post- Keynesians. Particular attention is paid to the turn in views within the mainstream, from the Real Business Cycles doctrine to state-of-the-art models of the New Synthesis. It is emphasized that the complete exogeneity of money supply is a distinctive feature only of the monetarist approach, which has relied on the specifi c assumption of the stability of money demand function. The paper shows that, despite the visible convergence between the New Keynesian and Post- Keynesian positions, based on the modeling of interest rate targeting rather than money supply targeting by the central bank, fundamental differences still remain between two camps regarding the endogeneity mechanism.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
7

Ramadan, Usamah, et Warren J. Samuels. « The Treatment of Post Keynesian Economics in the History of Economic Thought Texts ». Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 18, no 4 (juillet 1996) : 547–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01603477.1996.11490086.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
8

Dostaler, G. « Post Keynesian Price Theory ». History of Political Economy 32, no 3 (1 septembre 2000) : 698–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-32-3-698.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
9

Dow, S. C. « History of Economic Thought in the Post-Keynesian Tradition ». History of Political Economy 34, Suppl 1 (1 janvier 2002) : 319–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-34-suppl_1-319.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
10

Balakrishnan, Radhika, et William Milberg. « Firm innovation and capitalist dialectics : The economics of Nina Shapiro ». Economic and Labour Relations Review 30, no 4 (14 octobre 2019) : 467–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1035304619880473.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
This essay is a review of and tribute to the life and contributions of Nina Shapiro, who passed away this year. Shapiro was an American Post-Keynesian economist, who was a bridge figure in radical economics, connecting Marx to Keynes, Schumpeter to Kaldor, the behavior of the firm to the dynamics of the macroeconomy, and the process of innovation to the organization of production and accumulation. She was seminal to important moments in the history of radical economics in the US, including the formation of the Hegel-inspired journal Social Concept in the 1980s and the Rutgers University’s Post-Keynesian circle in the 1980s and 1990s. Shapiro’s deeply philosophical and dialectical approach to firm behavior, innovation, and business cycles led her to theorize the “revolutionary character” of Post-Keynesian economics and to formulate a critique of the competitive neoclassical firm which, she argued, is at odds with the logic of capitalism in which firms seek to make profit and grow. JEL Codes: B24, B32, B51, B55
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
11

RUTHERFORD, MALCOLM, et C. TYLER DESROCHES. « THE INSTITUTIONALIST REACTION TO KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS ». Journal of the History of Economic Thought 30, no 1 (mars 2008) : 29–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1042771608000033.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
12

Johnson, L. E., et Thomas Cate. « A History of Post Keynesian Economics Since 1936 : A Review Article ». Atlantic Economic Journal 34, no 1 (mars 2006) : 115–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11293-006-6137-3.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
13

Lee, Frederic S. « The Organizational History of Post Keynesian Economics in America, 1971-1995 ». Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 23, no 1 (septembre 2000) : 141–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2000.11490275.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
14

Mahloudji, F. « Hicks and the Keynesian Revolution ». History of Political Economy 17, no 2 (1 juin 1985) : 287–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-17-2-287.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
15

Pat, O'Mally, et Darren Palmer. « Post-Keynesian policing ». Economy and Society 25, no 2 (mai 1996) : 137–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03085149600000007.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
16

Barnett, Vincent. « Further Thoughts on Clarifying the Idea of Dissent : The Russian and Soviet Experience ». Journal of the History of Economic Thought 28, no 1 (mars 2006) : 111–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10427710500509672.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
In his Journal of the History of Economic Thought article, “A Suggestion for Clarifying the Study of Dissent in Economics,” Roger Backhouse usefully proposed some terminological clarifications with respect to studying the ideas of disagreement, controversy, and dissent in (Western) economic discourse, heterodoxy being defined as a more narrow category than dissent. Backhouse also wrote that “the ideas on which Marxist, Radical, and Post Keynesian economics are based were arguably never widely held” (Backhouse 2004, p. 265).
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
17

Leeson, R. « Keynes and the "Keynesian" Phillips Curve ». History of Political Economy 31, no 3 (1 septembre 1999) : 493–509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-31-3-493.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
18

Blaug, M. « Second Thoughts on the Keynesian Revolution ». History of Political Economy 23, no 2 (1 juin 1991) : 171–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-23-2-171.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
19

Skidelsky, Robert. « Keynes : The second coming ? » Panoeconomicus 68, no 2 (2021) : 159–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/pan2102159s.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
This article outlines principles of a modernised macroeconomic framework, drawing on John Maynard Keynes. It explores the historical context in which Keynes? economic theory arose, and the history of its application and subsequent replacement by neoclassical economics. The article argues that any updated Keynesian programme must address three new problems: globalization, wealth inequality and climate change. It sketches out the ways in which these might be addressed.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
20

Ghivirigă, Teodora. « Keynesian Terminology in Romanian : A Case Study ». Linguaculture 1, no 1 (1 juin 2010) : 97–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.47743/lincu-2010-1-0225.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
In The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (1936), Keynes lays the foundations of what is today known as macroeconomics; trying to establish the causes of unemployment and inflation, he introduces a set of terms related to saving, consumption and investment: marginal propensity to consumption, marginal propensity to spend, propensity to liquidities, propensity to savings. His book was translated into Romanian in 1970, although the basic terms pertaining to Keynesianism had already been disseminated via courses in the history of economic ideas. The present paper assesses the way in which Keynesian terminology has been translated into Romanian: hesitations, overlaps can be identified (e.g. both motives and incentives are rendered as mobiluri; however, the major concern is the incongruity related to the terms inducement and propensity, both translated into Romanian as înclinaţie). It also attempts to offer a possible explanation of this incongruity for the Romanian terminology of economics.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
21

Clerc, Pierrick, et Rodolphe Dos Santos Ferreira. « On Keynesian Economics and the Economics of Keynes after fifty years ». European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 27, no 6 (3 septembre 2020) : 919–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2020.1817116.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
22

Boianovsky, M. « 50 Years a Keynesian and Other Essays ». History of Political Economy 35, no 4 (1 décembre 2003) : 781–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-35-4-781.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
23

Plassard, Romain. « Clower’s Volte-Face regarding the “Keynesian Revolution” ». History of Political Economy 50, no 2 (1 juin 2018) : 261–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-6608578.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
24

Fusfeld, D. R. « Keynes and the Keynesian cross : a note ». History of Political Economy 17, no 3 (1 septembre 1985) : 385–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-17-3-385.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
25

Tarasov, Vasily. « On History of Mathematical Economics : Application of Fractional Calculus ». Mathematics 7, no 6 (4 juin 2019) : 509. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math7060509.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Modern economics was born in the Marginal revolution and the Keynesian revolution. These revolutions led to the emergence of fundamental concepts and methods in economic theory, which allow the use of differential and integral calculus to describe economic phenomena, effects, and processes. At the present moment the new revolution, which can be called “Memory revolution”, is actually taking place in modern economics. This revolution is intended to “cure amnesia” of modern economic theory, which is caused by the use of differential and integral operators of integer orders. In economics, the description of economic processes should take into account that the behavior of economic agents may depend on the history of previous changes in economy. The main mathematical tool designed to “cure amnesia” in economics is fractional calculus that is a theory of integrals, derivatives, sums, and differences of non-integer orders. This paper contains a brief review of the history of applications of fractional calculus in modern mathematical economics and economic theory. The first stage of the Memory Revolution in economics is associated with the works published in 1966 and 1980 by Clive W. J. Granger, who received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 2003. We divide the history of the application of fractional calculus in economics into the following five stages of development (approaches): ARFIMA; fractional Brownian motion; econophysics; deterministic chaos; mathematical economics. The modern stage (mathematical economics) of the Memory revolution is intended to include in the modern economic theory new economic concepts and notions that allow us to take into account the presence of memory in economic processes. The current stage actually absorbs the Granger approach based on ARFIMA models that used only the Granger–Joyeux–Hosking fractional differencing and integrating, which really are the well-known Grunwald–Letnikov fractional differences. The modern stage can also absorb other approaches by formulation of new economic notions, concepts, effects, phenomena, and principles. Some comments on possible future directions for development of the fractional mathematical economics are proposed.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
26

Rollings, N. « The "Keynesian Revolution" and Economic Policy-Making : A Comment ». Economic History Review 38, no 1 (février 1985) : 95. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2596647.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
27

Booth, Alan. « The "Keynesian Revolution" and Economic Policy-Making : A Reply ». Economic History Review 38, no 1 (février 1985) : 101. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2596648.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
28

Bakeev, M. B. « A compromise between formalism and realism as a way to influence economic policy ». Journal of the New Economic Association 57, no 5 (2022) : 113–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2022-57-5-7.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
In this paper, we argue that economics faces two conflicting societal demands. On the one hand, there is a demand for a practical theory that can be successfully used in the framework of economic policy, in solving various applied problems, etc. On the other hand, the established scientific ethos sets high standards for the internal consistency and formalism of the theory, which often limits its realism and practical applicability. As we speculate in this article, based on the history of the post-war macroeconomic mainstream, the most successful schools of thought in terms of policy impact are those that attempt to respond to both of these demands. This is expressed in the choice of a middle, compromise path: the preservation of a formalized abstract core of the theory while introducing modifications that increase its realism. Based on the study of the influence of four schools in macroeconomics, namely, post-war mainstream Keynesianism (so-called “The Neoclassical Synthesis”), monetarism, new classical macroeconomics, and new Keynesian macroeconomics, on US monetary policy, we claim that New Keynesians turned out to be the most influential school, as they managed to combine the standards of formalism and realism as much as possible.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
29

Rollings, Neil. « British Budgetary Policy 1945-1954 : A 'Keynesian Revolution' ? » Economic History Review 41, no 2 (mai 1988) : 283. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2596059.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
30

Garside, W. R., et T. J. Hatton. « Keynesian Policy and British Unemployment in the 1930s ». Economic History Review 38, no 1 (février 1985) : 83. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2596645.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
31

Tomlinson, Jim, et Peter Clarke. « The Keynesian Revolution in the Making, 1924-1936. » Economic History Review 42, no 4 (novembre 1989) : 615. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2597121.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
32

Booth, A. « Britain in the 1950s : A "Keynesian" Managed Economy ? » History of Political Economy 33, no 2 (1 juin 2001) : 283–313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-33-2-283.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
33

Cord, R. A. « Reinterpreting the Keynesian Revolution : A Research School Analysis ». History of Political Economy 43, no 1 (28 février 2011) : 161–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-2010-047.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
34

Davidson, P. « Patinkin's interpretation of Keynes and the Keynesian cross ». History of Political Economy 21, no 3 (1 septembre 1989) : 549–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-21-3-549.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
35

Garside, W. R., et Alan Booth. « British Economic Policy, 1931-49 : Was there a Keynesian Revolution?. » Economic History Review 43, no 4 (novembre 1990) : 754. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2596762.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
36

Tomlinson, Jim, et Alan Booth. « British Economic Policy, 1931-1949 : Was There a Keynesian Revolution ? » Economic History Review 43, no 2 (mai 1990) : 310. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2596807.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
37

Booth, Alan. « New revisionists and the Keynesian era in British economic policy ». Economic History Review 54, no 2 (mai 2001) : 346–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0289.00195.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
38

Pomini, Mario. « Interpreting the path of Italian economic thought : The contribution of Eraldo Fossati ». HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, no 1 (mars 2021) : 21–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/spe2020-001002.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
In this article, we focus on the figure of Eraldo Fossati, He was a protagonist of the development of Italian economic thought in the central decades of the last century. At the beginning he tried to dynamize the Paretian theory of general equilibrium. In the first phase he emphasized the role of true uncertainty following the Austrian tradition. Ended a short corporatist parenthesis, after the second world war he supported the Keynesian theory and made an original proposal to reconcile Pareto and Keynes, considering the latter not as a revolutionary economist but rather as an innovator who furnished new tools to understanding the real workings of contemporary economic systems with their chronic unemployment. In fact, after the Second World War Fossati was one of the main exponents of the Keynesian turn in Italy.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
39

Miller, E. « Keynesian Economics as a Translation Error : an Essay on Keynes' Financial Theory ». History of Political Economy 17, no 2 (1 juin 1985) : 265–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-17-2-265.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
40

Khalil, Elias L. « What is Economic Action ? From Marshall and Robbins to Polanyi and Becker ». Journal of the History of Economic Thought 18, no 1 (1996) : 13–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1053837200002947.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
In the past three decades economics has entered a new phase in its development. The new stage did not involve a revolutionary change of basic tools as occurred with the triumph of neoclassical economics at the turn of the twentieth century and Keynesian economics in the post World War II era. Rather the recent mutation involves the introduction of economic tools of analysis into areas which have traditionally been part of contiguous disciplines. The invasion of economics came to be referred to, even by its enthusiasts (e.g., Stigler 1984; Radnitzky and Bernholz 1986), as “economics imperialism.”
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
41

Blaug, Mark. « The Formalist Revolution of the 1950s ». Journal of the History of Economic Thought 25, no 2 (juin 2003) : 145–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1042771032000083309.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Something happened to economics in the decade of the 1950s that is little appreciated by most economists and even by professional historians of economic thought. The subject went through an intellectual revolution as profound in its impact as the so-called Keynesian Revolution of pre-war years. I call it the Formalist Revolution after Ward (1972, pp. 40–41), who was the first to recognize the profound intellectual transformation of economics in the years after World War II.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
42

Booth, Alan. « New revisionists and the Keynesian era : an expanding consensus ? » Economic History Review 56, no 1 (février 2003) : 125–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0289.00245.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
43

Dimand, R. W. « Hawtrey and the Keynesian Multiplier : A Response to Ahiakpor ». History of Political Economy 32, no 4 (1 décembre 2000) : 909–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-32-4-909.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
44

Rancan, Antonella. « Income Distribution, Consumption, and Economic Growth in Italy ». History of Political Economy 51, no 5 (1 octobre 2019) : 867–900. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-7803703.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
The paper discusses Modigliani, Brumberg, and Ando’s life cycle hypothesis and its difficult acceptance in Italy over the 1960s and 1970s. The increasing attention to the effects of income redistribution on consumption coupled with the strong influence that post-Keynesian economics exercised on the theoretical and political debate of that time led to a widespread preference of Kaldor’s theory as over the life cycle as the best representation of Italian savings behavior.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
45

Martínez Hernández, Francisco A., et Víctor M. Isidro Luna. « CAPITALISM : COMPETITION, CONFLICT, CRISES, ANWAR SHAIKH ». Investigación Económica 79, no 311 (10 décembre 2019) : 137. http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/fe.01851667p.2020.311.72441.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
<p>In 1,024 pages, seventeen chapters, and divided in three books, plus seventeen appendixes, Anwar Shaikh, one of the leading scholars and a distinguished Professor of Economics at the New School for Social Research, presents a path breaking and monumental book which main objective is the unified study of the logic, history, dynamics, and crises of the capitalist system. Throughout this book, the author confronts his own perspective and method of the classical political economy with major schools of economic thought such as neoclassical, monetarist, and different branches of the post-Keynesian school...</p>
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
46

Ahiakpor, J. C. W. « Hawtrey on the Keynesian Multiplier : A Question of Cognitive Dissonance ? » History of Political Economy 32, no 4 (1 décembre 2000) : 889–908. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-32-4-889.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
47

Lucas, R. E. « Keynote Address to the 2003 HOPE Conference : My Keynesian Education ». History of Political Economy 36, Suppl 1 (1 janvier 2004) : 12–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-36-suppl_1-12.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
48

Solberg, W. U., et R. W. Tomilson. « Academic McCarthyism and Keynesian Economics : The Bowen Controversy at the University of Illinois ». History of Political Economy 29, no 1 (1 mars 1997) : 55–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-29-1-55.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
49

Leeson, R. « The Coming of Keynesianism to America : Conversations with the Founders of Keynesian Economics ». History of Political Economy 32, no 1 (1 mars 2000) : 167–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-32-1-167.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
50

Repapis, Constantinos. « Essays in Keynesian Persuasion ». European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 27, no 3 (3 mai 2020) : 465–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2020.1761667.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Vous pouvez également être intéressé par les bibliographies sur le sujet « Keynesian economics – History » pour d’autres types de sources :
Livres
Nous offrons des réductions sur tous les plans premium pour les auteurs dont les œuvres sont incluses dans des sélections littéraires thématiques. Contactez-nous pour obtenir un code promo unique!

Vers la bibliographie