Livres sur le sujet « Justification of induction »

Pour voir les autres types de publications sur ce sujet consultez le lien suivant : Justification of induction.

Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres

Choisissez une source :

Consultez les 16 meilleurs livres pour votre recherche sur le sujet « Justification of induction ».

À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.

Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.

Parcourez les livres sur diverses disciplines et organisez correctement votre bibliographie.

1

Kawalec, Paweł. Structural reliabilism : Inductive logic as a theory of justification. Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Induktion und Rechtfertigung. Frankfurt am Main : Klostermann, 1985.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
3

Read, Rupert J. Practices without foundations ? : Sceptical readings of Wittgenstein and Goodman : an investigation into the description and justification of induction and meaning at the intersection of Kripke's 'Wittgenstein on rules and private language' and Goodman's 'Fact, fiction and forecast'. Ann Arbor, Mich : UMI, 1997.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
4

Howson, Colin. Hume's Problem : Induction and the Justification of Belief. Oxford University Press, Incorporated, 2000.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
5

Hume's Problem : Induction and the Justification of Belief. Oxford University Press, USA, 2001.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
6

Howson, Colin. Hume's Problem : Induction and the Justification of Belief. Oxford University Press, USA, 2003.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
7

Will, Frederick L. Induction and Justification : An Investigation of Cartesian Procedure in the Philosophy of Knowledge. Cornell University Press, 2020.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
8

Johnsen, Bredo. Nelson Goodman. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190662776.003.0008.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Goodman addressed the problem of induction twice. His first approach is famous, centers on his “new riddle of induction,” and is the locus classicus of modern reflective equilibrium theory. In it the focus is on inductive inferences and rules of inductive inference. In his second approach, the focus is instead on the conclusions of inductive inferences to explanations of the available data. Here reflective equilibrium theory is more fully developed. The author in this chapter argues that Goodman’s two accounts of inductive justification in terms of reflective equilibrium share a deep commonality.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
9

Franklin, James. Pre-history of Probability. Sous la direction de Alan Hájek et Christopher Hitchcock. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199607617.013.3.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
The history of the evaluation of uncertain evidence before the quantification of probability in 1654 is a mass of examples relevant to current debates. They deal with matters that in general are as unquantified now as ever – the degree to which evidence supports theory, the strength and justification of inductive inferences, the weight of testimony, the combination of pieces of uncertain evidence, the price of risk, the philosophical nature of chance, and the problem of acting in case of doubt. Concepts similar to modern “proof beyond reasonable doubt” were developed especially in the legal theory of evidence. Moral theology discussed “probabilism”, the doctrine that one could follow a probable opinion in ethics even if the opposite was more probable. Philosophers understood the difficult problem of induction. Legal discussion of “aleatory contracts” such as insurance and games of chance developed the framework in which the quantification of probability eventually took place.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
10

Hoskin, Peter, Thankamma Ajithkumar et Vicky Goh, dir. Imaging for Clinical Oncology. 2e éd. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198818502.001.0001.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Imaging is a critical component in the delivery of radiotherapy to patients with malignancy, and this text teaches the principles and practice of imaging specific to radiotherapy. Introductory chapters outline the basic principles of the available imaging modalities, including X-rays, CT, ultrasound, MRI, nuclear medicine, and PET. Site specific chapters then cover the main tumour sites, reviewing optimal imaging techniques for diagnosis, staging, radiotherapy planning, and follow-up for each site. The important areas of radiation protection, exposure justification, and risks are also covered, exploring issues such as balancing radiation exposure with long-term risks of radiation effects, such as second cancer induction. This second edition has been fully revised and updated to reflect current techniques, and includes two brand new chapters on imaging for radiotherapy treatment verification, and the role of specialist MRI techniques and functional imaging for radiotherapy planning.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
11

Structural Reliabilism : Inductive Logic as a Theory of Justification. Springer, 2011.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
12

Kawalec, P. Structural Reliabilism : Inductive Logic as a Theory of Justification. Springer, 2012.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
13

Kawalec, P. Structural Reliabilism : Inductive Logic As a Theory of Justification. Springer, 2012.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
14

Watkins, Eric. Kant. Sous la direction de Helen Beebee, Christopher Hitchcock et Peter Menzies. Oxford University Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199279739.003.0006.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Kant's views on causality have long been of interest to philosophers as promising an alternative to Hume's empiricist account without thereby falling back into a strictly or straightforwardly rationalist position. Slightly more specifically, Kant holds that a causal principle according to which every event has a cause, or follows according to a causal law, cannot be established through induction as a purely empirical claim, since it would then lack strict universality, or necessity. This article briefly describes the historical context in which Kant develops his account of causality, and then clarifies some central features pertaining to the meaning, justification, and presuppositions of the claims that form the heart of this account before concluding with a brief sketch of how his views on causality are incorporated into his views in physics and biology. Accordingly, the article discusses Kant's views on causality in his pre-Critical period.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
15

Kawalec, P. Structural Reliabilism : Inductive Logic as a Theory of Justification (Trends in Logic). Springer, 2002.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
16

Vogt, Katja Maria, et Justin Vlasits, dir. Epistemology After Sextus Empiricus. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190946302.001.0001.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Pyrrhonian skepticism is defined by its commitment to inquiry. The Greek work skepsis means inquiry—not doubt, or whatever else later forms of skepticism took to be at the core of skeptical philosophy. The book proposes that Sextus Empiricus’s legacy in the history of epistemology is that he developed an epistemology of inquiry. The volume’s authors investigate epistemology after Sextus, both ways in which he has influenced the history of philosophy and ways in which he and the Pyrrhonian tradition he represents ought to contribute to contemporary debates. As a whole, the book aims to (re)instate Sextus as an important philosopher in these discussions in much the same way that Aristotle has been brought into discussions in contemporary ethics, action theory, and metaphysics. Sextus provides a fresh take on contemporary debates because he approaches issues of perception, disagreement, induction, and ignorance from the perspective of inquiry. The volume’s contributions address four core themes of Sextus’s skepticism: (1) appearances and perception, (2) the structure of justification and proof, (3) belief and ignorance, and (4) ethics and action. These themes are explored in some historical authors whose work relates to Sextus, including Peripatetic logicians, Locke, Hume, Nietzsche, and German idealists; and they are explored as they figure in today’s epistemology, philosophy of mind, philosophy of language, and ethics.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Nous offrons des réductions sur tous les plans premium pour les auteurs dont les œuvres sont incluses dans des sélections littéraires thématiques. Contactez-nous pour obtenir un code promo unique!

Vers la bibliographie