Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « Judicial Borrowing »
Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres
Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « Judicial Borrowing ».
À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.
Articles de revues sur le sujet "Judicial Borrowing"
Гладунова, Елена. « Государственная служба в судебных органах Европы и Украины : сравнительный анализ ». Studia Sieci Uniwersytetów Pogranicza 5 (2021) : 45–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.15290/sup.2021.05.04.
Texte intégralSusilowati, Susi, Hany Maria Valentine et Samuel Ramos. « Rancang Bangun Aplikasi Simpan Pinjam Koperasi Pegawai Pada Komisi Yudisial RI Berbasis Android ». Eksplorasi Teknologi Enterprise dan Sistem Informasi (EKSTENSI) 1, no 1 (30 novembre 2022) : 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.59039/ekstensi.v1i1.1.
Texte intégralSamararatne, Dinesha. « Judicial borrowing and creeping influences : Indian jurisprudence in Sri Lankan public law ». Indian Law Review 2, no 3 (2 septembre 2018) : 205–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2018.1564961.
Texte intégralRUBIN, AVI. « Legal borrowing and its impact on Ottoman legal culture in the late nineteenth century ». Continuity and Change 22, no 2 (août 2007) : 279–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0268416007006339.
Texte intégralGusev, Aleksey Yu. « The Development of Legal Provisions on Protection of Social Rights of Employees in the Pre- Revolutionary Russia (the Early XX Century) ». Arbitrazh-civil procedure 4 (8 avril 2021) : 56–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-4-56-60.
Texte intégralКрасівський, Орест, et Орися Мерза. « European experience of state policy in the field of justice ». Public administration aspects 8, no 4 (29 octobre 2020) : 55–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.15421/152080.
Texte intégralMasterman, Roger. « The constitutional influence of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council on the UK apex court : institutional proximity and jurisprudential divergence ? » Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 71, no 2 (14 août 2020) : 285–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v71i2.320.
Texte intégralKELEMEN, R. DANIEL, et TERENCE K. TEO. « Law, Focal Points, and Fiscal Discipline in the United States and the European Union ». American Political Science Review 108, no 2 (mai 2014) : 355–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0003055414000100.
Texte intégralEmeziem, Cosmas. « From Judicial Transplants to Judicial Translations : Constitutional Courts in Southern Africa – A Comparative Review ». International and Comparative Law Review 19, no 1 (1 juin 2019) : 74–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2019-0003.
Texte intégralStanciu, Mihai-Alexandru. « The content of the preventive measure of home detention ». Technium Social Sciences Journal 16 (4 janvier 2022) : 642–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v16i1.5649.
Texte intégralThèses sur le sujet "Judicial Borrowing"
Bateman, William. « Parliamentary control of public money ». Thesis, University of Cambridge, 2018. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/286229.
Texte intégralCIUFFOLETTI, SOFIA. « DAL FENOMENO DEL JUDICIAL BORROWING AL DIALOGO TRANSNAZIONALE FRA CORTI. I NUOVI ORIZZONTI DEL DIBATTITO DOTTRINALE ». Doctoral thesis, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/2158/865629.
Texte intégralWu, Chi-Hsien, et 吳紀賢. « On the Judicial Practice of Borrowing Other’s Name for Real Estate Registration : Focusing on the Interactions between Types of Cases and Burden of Proof ». Thesis, 2018. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/k7saa4.
Texte intégral國立中央大學
產業經濟研究所
106
After years of development, the country’s current judicial practice on the type of contract of borrowing other’s name for real estate registration has moved on from denying its validity to recognizing it as a nameless contract in the majority of cases. Additionally, based on the principle of freedom of contract, under the condition that the said contract does not violate general legal principle of imperative provision, public policy and morals in the Civil Code, its validity shall be recognized. In Mainland China, there are similar acts with borrowing other’s name for real estate registration, which is known locally as “Buying a House by the Name of another Person.” This research aims to collect and analyze the literature and practical judgments concerning the issue of borrowing other’s name for real estate registration so as to clarify the characteristics, validity, and its legal status in Mainland China and Taiwan. There is a gradual increase of legal disputes involving borrowing other’s name for real estate registration in recent years, which demonstrates the significance of the controversy involved in judicial practice, as well as the fact that the reason for initiating litigation has become diversified. In addition, in civil litigation, the defining factor of winning or losing a lawsuit is the burden of proof. Therefore, during litigation, it is extremely crucial for litigants on how the court distributes the burden of proof and how to decide whether the scenario of borrowing other’s name for real estate registration takes place or not, as well as if consistent and common logic and standard are found in judicial decisions involving similar causes and facts. The aim of this research is to summarize and categorize the features and imagery of court cases of similar causes and facts involving borrowing other’s name for real estate registration, and then uses the said summary and categorization to observe and examine the Taiwan Taoyuan District Court’s judgment of civil litigations involving borrowing other’s name for real estate registration in 2017. The researcher cross-examines and investigates the interactions between various types of litigations and the litigants’ burden of proof in judicial practice, and proposes his initial observations and analysis in how the court affirms the occurrence of borrowing other’s name for real estate registration, how it allocates the burden of proof, and how it investigates the facts and interpreted the laws, and if consistent and common standard exists in the process of judgment. Finally, through the aforementioned empirical observation, the research proposes some perspectives in response to the controversy surrounding borrowing other’s name for real estate registration, and aims to provide guidance for litigants in cases involving borrowing other’s name for real estate registration. It is hoped that the humble opinions proposed in this research would serve as a blueprint for further studies of the legal systems of borrowing other’s name for real estate registration.
Livres sur le sujet "Judicial Borrowing"
Dixon, Rosalind, et David Landau. Abusive Constitutional Borrowing. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192893765.001.0001.
Texte intégralChapitres de livres sur le sujet "Judicial Borrowing"
Dixon, Rosalind, et David Landau. « Abusive Judicial Review ». Dans Abusive Constitutional Borrowing, 81–115. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192893765.003.0005.
Texte intégralDixon, Rosalind, et David Landau. « The Abusive Borrowing of Political Constitutionalism and Weak-Form Judicial Review ». Dans Abusive Constitutional Borrowing, 152–75. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192893765.003.0007.
Texte intégralDixon, Rosalind, et David Landau. « Democracy and Abusive Constitutional Change ». Dans Abusive Constitutional Borrowing, 23–35. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192893765.003.0002.
Texte intégralCalabresi, Steven Gow. « The Republic of Korea ». Dans The History and Growth of Judicial Review, Volume 2, 189–200. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190075736.003.0008.
Texte intégralCalabresi, Steven Gow. « Introduction The Birth and Growth of Judicial Review in the Civil Law World ». Dans The History and Growth of Judicial Review, Volume 2, 1–8. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190075736.003.0001.
Texte intégralPollicino, Oreste. « Populist Constitutional Grammar - Between Manipulative Borrowing and Bad (Judicial) Masters ». Dans Anti-Constitutional Populism, 434–61. Cambridge University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781009031103.017.
Texte intégralCalabresi, Steven Gow. « The Union of India : Umpiring and Rights from Wrongs ». Dans The History and Growth of Judicial Review, Volume 1, 263–310. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190075774.003.0008.
Texte intégralCalabresi, Steven Gow. « The Republic of South Africa ». Dans The History and Growth of Judicial Review, Volume 1, 337–62. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190075774.003.0010.
Texte intégral« World Bank Experience with Judicial Reform in Borrowing Countries — Some Relevant Issues ». Dans The World Bank in a Changing World, 247–76. Brill | Nijhoff, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004480377_010.
Texte intégralCalabresi, Steven Gow. « The Republic of France ». Dans The History and Growth of Judicial Review, Volume 2, 157–88. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190075736.003.0007.
Texte intégral