Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « Investment arbitration reform »
Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres
Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « Investment arbitration reform ».
À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.
Articles de revues sur le sujet "Investment arbitration reform"
De Brabandere, Eric. « Reforming Investment Law and Arbitration and the “New Economic World Order” : Between Myth and Reality ». Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting 114 (2020) : 67–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/amp.2021.25.
Texte intégralChoudhury, Barnali. « Democratic Implications Arising from the Intersection of Investment Arbitration and Human Rights ». Alberta Law Review 46, no 4 (1 août 2009) : 983. http://dx.doi.org/10.29173/alr213.
Texte intégralHodgson, Mélida N. « Reform and Adaptation : The Experience of the Americas with International Investment Law ». Journal of World Investment & ; Trade 21, no 1 (13 février 2020) : 140–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22119000-12340170.
Texte intégralDickson, Moses Oruaze. « Rebalancing international investment agreements in favour of host states ». International Journal of Law and Management 60, no 2 (12 mars 2018) : 452–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijlma-01-2017-0007.
Texte intégralSharpe, Jeremy K. « Control, Capacity, and Legitimacy in Investment Treaty Arbitration ». AJIL Unbound 112 (2018) : 261–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/aju.2018.69.
Texte intégralGiorgetti, Chiara. « A Common Code of Conduct for Investment Arbitrators ? » Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting 113 (2019) : 217–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/amp.2019.179.
Texte intégralNjegovan, Milica. « Izazovi reforme mehanizma rešavanja investicionih sporova ». Pravo i privreda 60, no 3 (15 août 2022) : 557–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.55836/pip_22307a.
Texte intégralGiorgetti, Chiara. « Selecting and Removing Arbitrators in International Investment Arbitration ». Brill Research Perspectives in International Investment Law and Arbitration 2, no 4 (10 septembre 2018) : 1–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/24055778-12340007.
Texte intégralJillani, Abid Hussain Shah, Rao Imran Habib, Muhammad Umair Razzaq et Muhammad Muneeb Raza. « Investment Dispute Settlement Mechanisms under the Recovery of CalvoismReform Practices and way forward ». Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 10, no 3 (30 septembre 2022) : 1082–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2022.1003.0270.
Texte intégralDimitropoulos, Georgios. « The Conditions for Reform : a Typology of “Backlash” and Lessons for Reform in International Investment Law and Arbitration ». Law & ; Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 18, no 3 (7 février 2020) : 416–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341411.
Texte intégralThèses sur le sujet "Investment arbitration reform"
Cosmas, Julius. « A critical assessment of the legitimacy of the international investment arbitration system : a call for reform ». University of the Western Cape, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/11394/4389.
Texte intégralCurrently most international investment disputes are settled through arbitration. The origin of this dispute settlement system can be associated with the recent proliferation of over 3000 Bilateral Investment Treaties. Through this system disputes are settled by autonomous and differently constituted tribunals which have powers to render final and binding awards. The dissatisfied party has very limited opportunity to challenge the rendered award as there are no higher bodies in the hierarchy where a dissatisfied party can lodge an appeal, save for limited procedural challenges which are allowed under the system. These differently constituted tribunals at times reach diametrically opposed decisions on similar facts and those decisions stand side by side and all are considered valid. These inconsistent decisions are leading to lack of consistency and uniformity which in turn affects the legitimacy of the system as a whole. The rules of these institutions do not allow the proceedings to be held in public despite the fact that at times these tribunals question the regulatory powers of the state and state measures on service provision to its citizens. Another issue under the current system is that due to lack of coordination, arbitrators play dual roles: as counsels and arbitrators. This practice compromises the cherished principle of the rule of law. In the effort to address these concerns, stakeholders have suggested a number of possible solutions. The suggested solutions include: invoking res judicata and lis pendens principles; adopting the doctrine of precedent; applying the ‘fork in the road’ principle; adopting the margin of appreciation standard in interpretation of BITs; creating an appellate structure at ICSID and creating a treaty to treaty appellate body. This research submits that, the suggested solutions singularly and cumulatively don not address the legitimacy issues adequately. The research therefore calls for the establishment of a Multilateral Agreement on Investment (MAI) in order to address the legitimacy issues cumulatively. It is submitted that establishing a Multilateral Investment Agreement (MAI) which provides for creating a standing international investment court with an appellate court is the only solution which addresses all the issues haunting the international investment dispute settlement system. In addition, the research suggests interim solutions which will help to increase the legitimacy of the current system pending the establishment of the MAI and the courts. The interim solutions include: establishment of the investor – state dispute adjudication Centre; effective utilisation of host state courts; mandatory publication of all awards; enhancing the effective use of member states interpretative statement; and forming a working commission to provide basic interpretation and the scope of the basic international investment law principles. These measures are only meant to improve the current system pending the establishment of the MAI and the courts. The research concludes that for the betterment of international investment law, the reform is inevitable and that the benefits would outweigh any demerits.
Rush, Tadhg. « An Investment Court System : Perpetuating or Reforming the Legitimacy Crisis in Investor-State Arbitration ? » Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Juridiska institutionen, 2019. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-384391.
Texte intégralLaurence, Marquis. « The Role of the European Union in the Systemic Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement in International and Regional Trade Agreements : The impact of the ISDS Reform on the Independence and Impartiality of Arbitrators ». Doctoral thesis, Luiss Guido Carli, 2022. https://hdl.handle.net/11385/222718.
Texte intégralDrakopoulos, David. « Appeal mechanisms and Investment Court Systems in Investor-State Dispute Settlement : An analysis of AM and ICS suggestions, in light of contemporary reform ». Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Juridiska institutionen, 2021. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-443417.
Texte intégralWiesner-Lameth, Michelle [Verfasser], Ralph Alexander [Gutachter] Lorz et Siegfried H. [Gutachter] Elsing. « Overcoming the Legitimacy Crisis in Investment Treaty Arbitration - Merit of the EU Reform Proposal vis-à-vis the Standard of Judicial Independence and Impartiality / Michelle Wiesner-Lameth ; Gutachter : Ralph Alexander Lorz, Siegfried H. Elsing ». Düsseldorf : Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek der Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, 2018. http://d-nb.info/1164230344/34.
Texte intégralWiesner-Lameth, Michelle [Verfasser], Ralph Alexander Gutachter] Lorz et Siegfried H. [Gutachter] [Elsing. « Overcoming the Legitimacy Crisis in Investment Treaty Arbitration - Merit of the EU Reform Proposal vis-à-vis the Standard of Judicial Independence and Impartiality / Michelle Wiesner-Lameth ; Gutachter : Ralph Alexander Lorz, Siegfried H. Elsing ». Düsseldorf : Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek der Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, 2018. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:061-20180803-092613-4.
Texte intégralFalcone, Thomas A. « Assessing Recent Proposals to Reform the Investment Treaty Arbitration System ». Thesis, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/1828/5624.
Texte intégralGraduate
Munzar, Tomáš. « Návrh Evropské komise ve věci reformy mechanismu řešení investičních sporů : komparativní analýza ». Master's thesis, 2016. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-347635.
Texte intégralLivres sur le sujet "Investment arbitration reform"
Alschner, Wolfgang. Investment Arbitration and State-Driven Reform. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197644386.001.0001.
Texte intégralBehn, Daniel, Ole Kristian Fauchald et Malcolm Langford, dir. The Legitimacy of Investment Arbitration. Cambridge University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108946636.
Texte intégralAlschner, Wolfgang. Investment Arbitration and State-Driven Reform : New Treaties, Old Outcomes. Oxford University Press, Incorporated, 2022.
Trouver le texte intégralFranck, Susan D. Arbitration Costs. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190054434.001.0001.
Texte intégralJeswald W, Salacuse. 15 Investment Treaty Dispute Settlement. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198703976.003.0015.
Texte intégralButt, Simon, et Tim Lindsey. Foreign Investment. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199677740.003.0018.
Texte intégralHobe, Stephan, et Julian Scheu, dir. Evolution, Evaluation and Future Developments in International Investment Law. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783748923756.
Texte intégralAloysius P, Llamzon. Corruption in International Investment Arbitration. Oxford University Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198714262.001.0001.
Texte intégralSchill, Stephan W. Authority, Legitimacy, and Fragmentation in the (Envisaged) Dispute Settlement Disciplines in Mega-Regionals. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198808893.003.0005.
Texte intégralSt John, Taylor. Conversion. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198789918.003.0008.
Texte intégralChapitres de livres sur le sujet "Investment arbitration reform"
Bjorklund, Andrea K., Susan D. Franck, C. Ignacio SuáRez Anzorena, Jan Paulsson et Alejandro A. Escobar. « ICSID and Other Investment Arbitration Tribunals : Is There a Need for Judicial Oversight or Other Reforms ? » Dans International Institutional Reform, 274–315. The Hague : T.M.C. Asser Press, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-673-2_11.
Texte intégralAlschner, Wolfgang. « Tax-Style Multilateralization ». Dans Investment Arbitration and State-Driven Reform, 269–92. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197644386.003.0010.
Texte intégralAlschner, Wolfgang. « Treaties as Data ». Dans Investment Arbitration and State-Driven Reform, 23–46. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197644386.003.0002.
Texte intégralAlschner, Wolfgang. « Evolution as Americanization ». Dans Investment Arbitration and State-Driven Reform, 81–120. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197644386.003.0004.
Texte intégralFranck, Susan D. « Introduction to Investment Treaty Arbitration (ITA) and Framing the Debate ». Dans Arbitration Costs, 1–24. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190054434.003.0001.
Texte intégralMohan, Mahdev, et Alexis Ang. « Singapore's Approach to ISDS Reform : ‘A Shift in Geography’ in Investment Law ? » Dans Foreign Investment and Investment Arbitration in Asia, 251–72. Intersentia, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781780688404.010.
Texte intégralAlschner, Wolfgang. « Introduction ». Dans Investment Arbitration and State-Driven Reform, 1–20. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197644386.003.0001.
Texte intégralAlschner, Wolfgang. « Reversing Innovation through MFN ». Dans Investment Arbitration and State-Driven Reform, 123–52. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197644386.003.0005.
Texte intégralAlschner, Wolfgang. « Overriding Differences through Custom ». Dans Investment Arbitration and State-Driven Reform, 153–82. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197644386.003.0006.
Texte intégralAlschner, Wolfgang. « Forward-Looking Interpretation ». Dans Investment Arbitration and State-Driven Reform, 219–44. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197644386.003.0008.
Texte intégralActes de conférences sur le sujet "Investment arbitration reform"
Ševčíková, Tereza. « Investment Arbitration Reform : Third-Party Funding in Investment Arbitration ». Dans COFOLA International 2022. Brno : Masaryk University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p280-0231-2022-8.
Texte intégralTuncay, Ahmet. « Arbitration Rules in Turkish Legal System ». Dans International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c04.00807.
Texte intégral