Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « Interstate Commission on the Delaware River Basin »

Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres

Choisissez une source :

Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « Interstate Commission on the Delaware River Basin ».

À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.

Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.

Articles de revues sur le sujet "Interstate Commission on the Delaware River Basin"

1

Hooper, Bruce. « River basin organization performance indicators : application to the Delaware River basin commission ». Water Policy 12, no 4 (31 mars 2010) : 461–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wp.2010.111.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
This paper reports the development of performance indicators of a river basin management organization's ability to undertake integrated water resources management, and applies them to a US basin organization: a river basin commission. Integrated water resources management (IWRM) and integrated river basin management (IRBM) are defined, in the context of international and US advances in IWRM and IRBM. A suite of good governance factors was assembled from the reviews of consultants' practical experiences in river basin management, peer-reviewed literature, government reports and policy statements, and reports of river basin management practice. A list of impediments to the implementation of IRBM was also assembled. These sources were used as the data set to develop 115 indicators of best practice in IRBM; these indicators were grouped into ten categories: coordinated decision-making, responsive decision-making, goals and goal shift, financial sustainability, organizational design, role of law, training and capacity building, information and research, accountability and monitoring, private and public sector roles. This paper reports the results of a facilitated workshop with the Delaware River Basin Commission's staff and stakeholders to apply the indicators to their setting. The outcome of the workshop was a self-assessment tool for performance evaluation, involving triaging the basin organization situation, checking performance against 20 performance benchmarks and using 63 performance indicators for basin commission settings. The paper concludes with a discussion of the issues surrounding the application of the performance indicators to other US basins and commissions.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Vicory, Alan H., et Peter A. Tennant. « Sustainable management of the Ohio River (USA) by an interjurisdictionally represented commission ». Water Science and Technology 32, no 5-6 (1 septembre 1995) : 193–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.1995.0600.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
In 1948 the Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Commission (ORSANCO) was established to abate pollution of a major river basin in the United States. The commission consists of representatives of eight states in the Ohio River Valley and the United States Government. The necessity of such an interstate commission, representing multiple jurisdictions, reflects the nature of the Ohio River which is approximately 1,580 km in length, transverses six states, and is extensively used for public and industrial water supply, wastewater disposal, transportation, power generation and recreation. ORSANCO's programmes include coordination and communication, setting and enforcing wastewater discharge standards, operating key water quality monitoring programmes for the Ohio River and major tributaries, data assessments and studies to evaluate problems and programmes for remediation, and monitoring when spills occur. The Commission's approach to achieving improved water quality, while at the same time balancing the needs of the users of the river, is accomplished by successfully involving and integrating the various interests in river management (governmental agencies, industry, public utilities, other river users and the general public) into its programme planning and implementation. Thus an intergovernmental agency which encourages co-operation with non-governmental entities can be an effective approach to sustainable management of a major river.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
3

Vicory, A. H., et A. K. Stevenson. « What's a river worth, anyway ? A resource valuation survey of the Ohio river ». Water Science and Technology 32, no 5-6 (1 septembre 1995) : 63–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.1995.0562.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
The Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Commission (ORSANCO) is a government agency established in 1948 to control and abate pollution of the interstate waters of the Ohio River Valley. ORSANCO, represented by eight states of the Ohio Valley and the federal government, carries out water quality monitoring and assessment programmes, co-ordinates spill response activities, promulgates pollution control standards for the Ohio River, and co-ordinates the individual programmes of state and federal agencies. ORSANCO recognizes that public and political support are as important to effective river basin management as technical knowledge and activities. Because such support is so closely related to economic interests, ORSANCO and the National Park Service commissioned a survey project in May 1993 to compile readily available data to estimate the “value” of the Ohio River from several key standpoints. This information is intended to draw attention to the national significance of the Ohio River in its economic, cultural and natural resource dimensions, and to illustrate the magnitude of positive economic impacts to be realized by achieving water quality improvements. This project brought together for the first time information that will serve to enhance public and political awareness of the Ohio River Valley, and thus enhance support for aggressive environmental management.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
4

Li, Ya-nan, Jing Li, Zhiwei Shao, Zhihui Duan, Yu Xie, Zhitai Cui, Jinyuan Li et al. « Quantitative analysis of 209 polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) congeners in sediments of the Raritan River estuary, USA ». Water Supply 20, no 6 (22 juin 2020) : 2400–2414. http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/ws.2020.130.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Abstract This study investigated the distribution of 209 polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) congeners in sediment samples collected from seven sites in the Raritan River estuary (NJ, USA) using gas chromatography/tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry (GC/MS/MS). Results showed that concentrations of 209 PCB congeners ranged up to 20 ng/g, that total PCB concentrations by homolog groups varied from 9.0 to 327 ng/g, and that total PCB mass ranged from 101.0 to 1,476.3 ng with the order of sites 6 > 7 > 3 > 4 > 2 > 1 > 5. Furthermore, higher PCB concentrations were detected for homolog groups including hexa- and hepta-PCBs. More PCBs were associated with sediments at downstream sites possibly due to accumulation and deposition in the estuary, as supported by strong correlations of PCB concentrations between different sampling sites (R2 ≤ 0.96). Comparisons with prior reports showed that all total PCB concentrations were below those reported by the Contamination Assessment and Reduction Project (CARP) and Delaware River Basin Commission (DRBC), except for sites 6 and 7. Sites 3 and 4 had PCB concentrations exceeding the 22.7 ng/g limit of the Sediment Quality Guidelines (SQGs), whereas sites 6 and 7 exceeded the 180 ng/g limit, indicating potential health hazards from PCBs.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
5

Rakhmatov, N. R. « EXPERIENCE OF THE BASIN WATER MANAGEMENT ASSOCOATION OF THE SYRDARYA TO CREATE A DATABASE PERIOD ». Irrigatsiya va Melioratsiya, 1 juin 2018, 31–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.35938/2018.1.12.8.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
The Syrdarya water basin association is an intergovernmental coordinating organization which is part of the interstate commission (ICWC) on Aral Sea rescue in the role of "Executor". Transboundary waters are distributed to Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan with the help of hydraulic structures within the association. In order to avoid disagreements between "water consumers" in distributing the transboundary waters of the Syr Darya, the operating organization should have up-to-date information on the amount of water flowing into Syr Darya River and on consumption of water distributed among users. This article describes the experience of the BWO "Syr Darya" in improving data collection and management of hydrosystems within its balance.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

Livres sur le sujet "Interstate Commission on the Delaware River Basin"

1

United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Susquehanna River Basin compact : Report (to accompany H.R. 2971) (including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office). [Washington, D.C. ? : U.S. G.P.O., 1986.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Office, General Accounting. Water resources : Delaware River Basin Commission's management of certain water activities : report to the Honorable Peter H. Kostmayer, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C : The Office, 1986.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
3

Office, General Accounting. Water resources : Issues concerning the Arkansas River Basin operation plan : report to the chairman, Environment, Energy, and Natural Resources Subcommittee, Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C : The Office, 1988.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
4

Office, General Accounting. Water resources : Corps of Engineers' drought management of Savannah River projects : report to the Honorable Butler Derrick, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C : The Office, 1989.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
5

Office, General Accounting. Water resources : Evaluation of erosion problems on upper Missouri River : briefing report to the chairman, Committee on Environment and Public Works, U.S. Senate. Washington, D.C : The Office, 1988.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
6

Office, General Accounting. Water resources : Costs of the Fountain Valley Authority pipeline : report to congressional requesters. Washington, D.C : The Office, 1988.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
7

Office, General Accounting. Water resources : The Corps of Engineers' revised review process for proposed civil works projects : report to congressional requesters. Washington, D.C : The Office, 1990.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
8

Office, General Accounting. Water resources : Corps of Engineers' inspections of West Williamson Flood Wall Project : report to the Honorable Robert C. Byrd, U.S. Senate. Washington, D.C : The Office, 1989.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
9

Office, General Accounting. Water resources : Corps of Engineers' transfer of three townsites : briefing report to the chairman, Committee on Environment and Public Works, U.S. Senate. Washington, D.C : The Office, 1988.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
10

Office, General Accounting. Water resources : Corps lacks authority for water supply contracts : report to congressional requesters. Washington, D.C : The Office, 1991.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

Chapitres de livres sur le sujet "Interstate Commission on the Delaware River Basin"

1

Moore, Scott M. « Over Water ». Dans Subnational Hydropolitics. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190864101.003.0008.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
The preceding chapters have emphasized the often unappreciated extent to which subnational jurisdictions engage in behaviors that resemble those of sovereign nation-states with respect to shared water resources. The United States, the world’s first modern federation, provides perhaps the clearest illustration of how institutional arrangements create the conditions for such behavior to be exercised. Even in comparison to other federal systems, the U.S. Constitution grants an unusual degree of power to state governments. This asymmetry is codified in the Constitution’s Tenth Amendment, which assigns all powers not specifically granted to the federal government to the states instead. The greater power of American states, even relative to their counterparts in other federal systems, is also reflected in the fact that they maintain not only independent executive and legislative bodies but also judiciaries, a feature that has resulted in the uniquely complicated American legal system wherein different states recognize different bodies of law, especially in the case of water rights (Watts 2008). Despite this fundamental asymmetry, the power of the federal government relative to the states has grown over time, especially following the expansion of federal authority during the New Deal era (Sharansky 1970; Elazar 1984; Zimmerman 2011). The United States also lacks several of the mechanisms that ensure a greater degree of coordination and cooperation between states in other federal systems. In particular, the United States lacks the prominent intergovernmental organizations, like the Council of Australian Governments, that are a feature of many other federal systems and that help to address interjurisdictional issues like water resource management. Hydropolitics in the United States presents a twofold puzzle. First, unlike the other countries examined in this book, the United States features a notable diversity of institutional models for governing its river basins. While many American river basins, including the Colorado, are governed either by a patchwork of institutions or by none at all, organizations like the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) and the Delaware River Basin Commission (DRBC) represent some of the most powerful river basin governance institutions in the world (Delli Priscoli 2007).
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

« From Catastrophe to Recovery : Stories of Fishery Management Success ». Dans From Catastrophe to Recovery : Stories of Fishery Management Success, sous la direction de Ronald J. Essig, R. Wilson Laney, Max H. Appelman, Fred A. Harris, Roger A. Rulifson et Kent L. Nelson. American Fisheries Society, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.47886/9781934874554.ch22.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
<i>Abstract</i>.—The Striped Bass <i>Morone saxatilis</i> is an extremely important commercial and recreational species with a coastal migratory stock in the United States referred to as “Atlantic Striped Bass” managed by the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC). Atlantic Striped Bass has four major contributing stocks, including the Chesapeake Bay, which comprises 70–90%, and the Hudson River, the Delaware River, and the Albemarle Sound/Roanoke River (A/R). The collapse of Atlantic Striped Bass in the late 1970s precipitated federal funding and legislation like the Emergency Striped Bass Study for research on causative factors of the decline and potential management recommendations. The 1981 ASMFC Interstate Fishery Management Plan (ISFMP) for Atlantic Striped Bass was nonmandatory and mostly ineffective until the 1984 Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation Act provided regulatory authorities to the ASMFC and the federal government to close fisheries in states out of compliance with ISFMPs. Restrictions and moratoria on harvest imposed in several states reduced mortality, and under favorable environmental conditions and given Striped Bass life history, multiple years of good recruitment occurred. This allowed target thresholds for female spawning stock biomass to be achieved and the ASMFC to declare recoveries of Atlantic Striped Bass stocks from 1995 to 1998. Regulation of river flows was particularly important for the A/R stock recovery, and this stock is presented as a case study. During the 20+ years following recovery, long-term monitoring by states in support of adaptive management was primarily supported by the stable, nonappropriated funding of the Sport Fish Restoration Act. Monitoring includes spawning stock characterization and biomass estimation, juvenile abundance surveys, cooperative coastwide tagging, and harvest data collection. Future issues facing the recovered Atlantic Striped Bass include interspecies effects of relatively high abundance, management of stocks separately instead of as a single coastal stock, and ecosystem-based fisheries management. Key lessons learned in the Atlantic Striped Bass recovery are that high societal value of the species provided the political impetus to create and fund the recovery program, coordination of management and enforcement efforts among all jurisdictions was essential for this migratory species, and fully funded long-term monitoring programs are critical to adaptive population management.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Nous offrons des réductions sur tous les plans premium pour les auteurs dont les œuvres sont incluses dans des sélections littéraires thématiques. Contactez-nous pour obtenir un code promo unique!

Vers la bibliographie