Bibliographies thématiques / Exogenous and endogenous attention / Articles de revues
Pour voir les autres types de publications sur ce sujet consultez le lien suivant : Exogenous and endogenous attention.

Articles de revues sur le sujet « Exogenous and endogenous attention »

Auteur : Grafiati
Publié le 9 mars 2023
Mis à jour le 10 mars 2023

Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres

Choisissez une source :

Consultez les 50 meilleurs articles de revues pour votre recherche sur le sujet « Exogenous and endogenous attention ».

À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.

Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.

Parcourez les articles de revues sur diverses disciplines et organisez correctement votre bibliographie.

1

Grubb, M. A., A. White, D. J. Heeger et M. Carrasco. « Does exogenous attention modulate endogenous attention ? » Journal of Vision 13, no 9 (25 juillet 2013) : 473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/13.9.473.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Wang, Teng, Haifeng Hu et Chen He. « Image Caption with Endogenous–Exogenous Attention ». Neural Processing Letters 50, no 1 (9 janvier 2019) : 431–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11063-019-09979-7.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
3

Santangelo, Valerio, Marta Olivetti Belardinelli, Charles Spence et Emiliano Macaluso. « Interactions between Voluntary and Stimulus-driven Spatial Attention Mechanisms across Sensory Modalities ». Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 21, no 12 (décembre 2009) : 2384–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.21178.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
In everyday life, the allocation of spatial attention typically entails the interplay between voluntary (endogenous) and stimulus-driven (exogenous) attention. Furthermore, stimuli in different sensory modalities can jointly influence the direction of spatial attention, due to the existence of cross-sensory links in attentional control. Using fMRI, we examined the physiological basis of these interactions. We induced exogenous shifts of auditory spatial attention while participants engaged in an endogenous visuospatial cueing task. Participants discriminated visual targets in the left or right hemifield. A central visual cue preceded the visual targets, predicting the target location on 75% of the trials (endogenous visual attention). In the interval between the endogenous cue and the visual target, task-irrelevant nonpredictive auditory stimuli were briefly presented either in the left or right hemifield (exogenous auditory attention). Consistent with previous unisensory visual studies, activation of the ventral fronto-parietal attentional network was observed when the visual targets were presented at the uncued side (endogenous invalid trials, requiring visuospatial reorienting), as compared with validly cued targets. Critically, we found that the side of the task-irrelevant auditory stimulus modulated these activations, reducing spatial reorienting effects when the auditory stimulus was presented on the same side as the upcoming (invalid) visual target. These results demonstrate that multisensory mechanisms of attentional control can integrate endogenous and exogenous spatial information, jointly determining attentional orienting toward the most relevant spatial location.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
4

MacLean, Katherine A., Stephen R. Aichele, David A. Bridwell, George R. Mangun, Ewa Wojciulik et Clifford D. Saron. « Interactions between endogenous and exogenous attention during vigilance ». Attention, Perception, & ; Psychophysics 71, no 5 (juillet 2009) : 1042–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/app.71.5.1042.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
5

McCormick, C. R., R. S. Redden, M. A. Lawrence et R. M. Klein. « The independence of endogenous and exogenous temporal attention ». Attention, Perception, & ; Psychophysics 80, no 8 (31 juillet 2018) : 1885–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1575-y.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
6

Zhao, Chen, Kan Zhang et Huahai Yang. « Studies on Endogenous and Exogenous Visual Selective Attention ». Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 44, no 1 (juillet 2000) : 144–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154193120004400138.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
7

Lawrence, Michael A., et Raymond M. Klein. « Isolating exogenous and endogenous modes of temporal attention. » Journal of Experimental Psychology : General 142, no 2 (2013) : 560–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029023.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
8

Koenig-Robert, R., et R. VanRullen. « Spatio-temporal mapping of exogenous and endogenous attention ». Journal of Vision 10, no 7 (17 août 2010) : 1280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/10.7.1280.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
9

Jigo, Michael, David J. Heeger et Marisa Carrasco. « An image-computable model of how endogenous and exogenous attention differentially alter visual perception ». Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, no 33 (13 août 2021) : e2106436118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2106436118.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Attention alters perception across the visual field. Typically, endogenous (voluntary) and exogenous (involuntary) attention similarly improve performance in many visual tasks, but they have differential effects in some tasks. Extant models of visual attention assume that the effects of these two types of attention are identical and consequently do not explain differences between them. Here, we develop a model of spatial resolution and attention that distinguishes between endogenous and exogenous attention. We focus on texture-based segmentation as a model system because it has revealed a clear dissociation between both attention types. For a texture for which performance peaks at parafoveal locations, endogenous attention improves performance across eccentricity, whereas exogenous attention improves performance where the resolution is low (peripheral locations) but impairs it where the resolution is high (foveal locations) for the scale of the texture. Our model emulates sensory encoding to segment figures from their background and predict behavioral performance. To explain attentional effects, endogenous and exogenous attention require separate operating regimes across visual detail (spatial frequency). Our model reproduces behavioral performance across several experiments and simultaneously resolves three unexplained phenomena: 1) the parafoveal advantage in segmentation, 2) the uniform improvements across eccentricity by endogenous attention, and 3) the peripheral improvements and foveal impairments by exogenous attention. Overall, we unveil a computational dissociation between each attention type and provide a generalizable framework for predicting their effects on perception across the visual field.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
10

Chong, Sang Chul, et Randolph Blake. « Exogenous attention and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry ». Vision Research 46, no 11 (mai 2006) : 1794–803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2005.10.031.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
11

Theeuwes, Jan. « Endogenous and Exogenous Control of Visual Selection ». Perception 23, no 4 (avril 1994) : 429–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p230429.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Among the most fundamental issues of visual attention research is the extent to which visual selection is controlled by properties of the stimulus or by the intentions, goals, and beliefs of the observer. Before selective attention operates, preattentive processes perform some basic analyses segmenting the visual field into functional perceptual units. The crucial question is whether the allocation of attention to these perceptual units is under the endogenous control of the observer (intentions, goals, beliefs) or under the exogenous control of stimulation. In this article evidence is discussed regarding the endogenous and exogenous control of attention in tasks in which subjects search for a particular ‘basic’ feature (eg search for a unique colour, shape, or brightness). In the present review it is suggested that selectivity in these types of search tasks is dependent on the relative saliency of the stimulus attributes. It is concluded that the visual system automatically calculates differences in basic features (eg difference in shape, colour, or brightness) and that visual information occupying the position of the highest saliency across stimulus dimensions is exogenously passed on to the ‘central representation’ that is responsible for further stimulus analysis. Alternative explanations of the present findings and tentative speculations resulting from the present approach are discussed.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
12

Reeck, Crystal, Kevin S. LaBar et Tobias Egner. « Neural Mechanisms Mediating Contingent Capture of Attention by Affective Stimuli ». Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24, no 5 (mai 2012) : 1113–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00211.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Attention is attracted exogenously by physically salient stimuli, but this effect can be dampened by endogenous attention settings, a phenomenon called “contingent capture.” Emotionally salient stimuli are also thought to exert a strong exogenous influence on attention, especially in anxious individuals, but whether and how top–down attention can ameliorate bottom–up capture by affective stimuli is currently unknown. Here, we paired a novel spatial cueing task with fMRI to investigate contingent capture as a function of the affective salience of bottom–up cues (face stimuli) and individual differences in trait anxiety. In the absence of top–down cues, exogenous stimuli validly cueing targets facilitated attention in low-anxious participants, regardless of affective salience. However, although high-anxious participants exhibited similar facilitation following neutral exogenous cues, this facilitation was completely absent following affectively negative exogenous cues. Critically, these effects were contingent on endogenous attentional settings, such that explicit top–down cues presented before the appearance of exogenous stimuli removed anxious individuals' sensitivity to affectively salient stimuli. fMRI analyses revealed a network of brain regions underlying this variability in affective contingent capture across individuals, including the fusiform face area (FFA), posterior ventrolateral frontal cortex, and SMA. Importantly, activation in the posterior ventrolateral frontal cortex and the SMA fully mediated the effects observed in FFA, demonstrating a critical role for these frontal regions in mediating attentional orienting and interference resolution processes when engaged by affectively salient stimuli.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
13

Berger, Andrea, et Avishai Henik. « The Endogenous Modulation of IOR is Nasal-Temporal Asymmetric ». Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12, no 3 (mai 2000) : 421–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/089892900562246.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to a reflexive mechanism mediated by phylogenetically primitive extrageniculate visuomotor pathways, which apparently serves to favor novel spatial locations by inhibiting those recently sampled. We demonstrate an asymmetry between temporal and nasal hemifields in the strategic modulation of IOR by endogenously controlled attention. Exogenous and endogenous precues were manipulated independently on each trial such that precues to initiate endogenous spatial orienting were presented after IOR had been activated by exogenous visual signals. Both types of precues manifested their characteristic effects on reaction time (RT) to detect subsequent targets: facilitation by endogenous precues, and IOR by exogenous precues. Under monocular viewing, an asymmetric interaction between these two mechanisms was observed. While endogenous allocation of attention to the nasal hemifield reduced IOR, no endogenous modulation of IOR was present in the temporal hemifield where the effects of the two types of precues were independent. These observations suggest a framework for understanding the neurobiology of automaticity and control—from an evolutionary perspective.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
14

Agaoglu, Sevda, Bruno Breitmeyer et Haluk Ogmen. « Effects of Exogenous and Endogenous Attention on Metacontrast Masking ». Vision 2, no 4 (10 octobre 2018) : 39. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision2040039.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
To efficiently use its finite resources, the visual system selects for further processing only a subset of the rich sensory information. Visual masking and spatial attention control the information transfer from visual sensory-memory to visual short-term memory. There is still a debate whether these two processes operate independently or interact, with empirical evidence supporting both arguments. However, recent studies pointed out that earlier studies showing significant interactions between common-onset masking and attention suffered from ceiling and/or floor effects. Our review of previous studies reporting metacontrast-attention interactions revealed similar artifacts. Therefore, we investigated metacontrast-attention interactions by using an experimental paradigm, in which ceiling/floor effects were avoided. We also examined whether metacontrast masking is differently influenced by endogenous and exogenous attention. We analyzed mean absolute-magnitude of response-errors and their statistical distribution. When targets are masked, our results support the hypothesis that manipulations of the levels of metacontrast and of endogenous/exogenous attention have largely independent effects. Moreover, statistical modeling of the distribution of response-errors suggests weak interactions modulating the probability of “guessing” behavior for some observers in both types of attention. Nevertheless, our data suggest that any joint effect of attention and metacontrast can be adequately explained by their independent and additive contributions.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
15

Şentürk, Gözde, Adam S. Greenberg et Taosheng Liu. « Saccade latency indexes exogenous and endogenous object-based attention ». Attention, Perception, & ; Psychophysics 78, no 7 (25 mai 2016) : 1998–2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1136-1.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
16

Jones, Alexander, et Bettina Forster. « Independent effects of endogenous and exogenous attention in touch ». Somatosensory & ; Motor Research 30, no 4 (16 avril 2013) : 161–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/08990220.2013.779243.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
17

Sætrevik, Bjørn, et Kenneth Hugdahl. « Endogenous and exogenous control of attention in dichotic listening. » Neuropsychology 21, no 3 (mai 2007) : 285–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.21.3.285.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
18

Roelofs, Karin, Gerard P. van Galen, Paul Eling, Ger P. J. Keijsers et Cees A. L. Hoogduin. « Endogenous and Exogenous Attention in Patients with Conversion Paresis ». Cognitive Neuropsychology 20, no 8 (décembre 2003) : 733–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02643290342000069.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
19

Berger, Andrea, Avishai Henik et Robert Rafal. « Competition Between Endogenous and Exogenous Orienting of Visual Attention. » Journal of Experimental Psychology : General 134, no 2 (2005) : 207–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.134.2.207.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
20

CHEN, XIAOXI, QI CHEN, DINGGUO GAO et ZHENZHU YUE. « Interaction between endogenous and exogenous orienting in crossmodal attention ». Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 53, no 4 (4 juin 2012) : 303–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00957.x.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
21

Chennu, Srivas, Paola Finoia, Evelyn Kamau, Martin M. Monti, Judith Allanson, John D. Pickard, Adrian M. Owen et Tristan A. Bekinschtein. « Dissociable endogenous and exogenous attention in disorders of consciousness ». NeuroImage : Clinical 3 (2013) : 450–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2013.10.008.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
22

Le Bigot, Nathalie, et Marc Grosjean. « Exogenous and endogenous shifts of attention in perihand space ». Psychological Research 80, no 4 (2 juillet 2015) : 677–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0680-y.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
23

Gowen, E., R. V. Abadi, E. Poliakoff, P. C. Hansen et R. C. Miall. « Modulation of saccadic intrusions by exogenous and endogenous attention ». Brain Research 1141 (avril 2007) : 154–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.01.047.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
24

Collins, Lindsay, et James Schirillo. « Attention to endogenous and exogenous cues affects auditory localization ». Experimental Brain Research 231, no 1 (14 août 2013) : 13–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3663-5.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
25

Renner, Peggy, Laura Grofer Klinger et Mark R. Klinger. « Exogenous and Endogenous Attention Orienting in Autism Spectrum Disorders ». Child Neuropsychology 12, no 4-5 (octobre 2006) : 361–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09297040600770753.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
26

TANG, Xiaoyu, Jiageng TONG, Hong YU et Aijun WANG. « Effects of endogenous spatial attention and exogenous spatial attention on multisensory integration ». Acta Psychologica Sinica 53, no 11 (2021) : 1173. http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1041.2021.01173.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
27

FILOTEO, J. VINCENT, DEAN C. DELIS, DAVID P. SALMON, THERESA DEMADURA, MARY J. ROMAN et CLIFFORD W. SHULTS. « An examination of the nature of attentional deficits in patients with Parkinson's disease : Evidence from a spatial orienting task ». Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 3, no 4 (juillet 1997) : 337–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1355617797003378.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Endogenous and exogenous shifts of attention were examined in nondemented patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). In the endogenous condition, an arrow was used to cue participants' attention to the possible location of an impending target, whereas in the exogenous condition, a brightened box was used to cue attention. Cues were either valid (i.e., the target appeared in the cued location) or invalid (i.e., the target appeared in a noncued location). The time between cue onset and target onset (stimulus onset asynchrony or SOA) was varied in each condition. The results indicated that PD patients were not differentially impaired in shifting attention at the shorter SOAs relative to normal controls. However, at longer SOAs, the PD patients demonstrated less of an effect from cueing than did the normal control participants. PD patients' differential effect from cueing was evident in both exogenous and endogenous conditions. These results suggest that PD patients may experience a rapid decay of attentional inhibition and do not support the notion that a decrement in processing resources underlies their attentional deficits. Moreover, these findings further support the notion that the basal ganglia may play an important role in attentional functions. (JINS, 1997, 3, 337–347.)
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
28

Jones, Alexander, et Bettina Forster. « Neural correlates of endogenous attention, exogenous attention and inhibition of return in touch ». European Journal of Neuroscience 40, no 2 (3 avril 2014) : 2389–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12583.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
29

Chakravarthi, R., et R. VanRullen. « Bullet trains and steam engines : Exogenous attention zips but endogenous attention chugs along ». Journal of Vision 11, no 4 (20 avril 2011) : 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/11.4.12.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
30

Smith, Daniel T., Thomas Schenk et Chris Rorden. « Saccade preparation is required for exogenous attention but not endogenous attention or IOR. » Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance 38, no 6 (décembre 2012) : 1438–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0027794.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
31

Chakravarthi, R., et R. VanRullen. « Beam me up, Scotty ! Exogenous attention teleports but endogenous attention takes the shuttle ». Journal of Vision 10, no 7 (3 août 2010) : 244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/10.7.244.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
32

Fernández, Antonio, Sara Okun et Marisa Carrasco. « Differential Effects of Endogenous and Exogenous Attention on Sensory Tuning ». Journal of Neuroscience 42, no 7 (27 décembre 2021) : 1316–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0892-21.2021.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
33

Fernandez, Antonio, Sara Okun et Marisa Carrasco. « Differential effects of endogenous and exogenous attention on sensory tuning ». Journal of Vision 21, no 9 (27 septembre 2021) : 2431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.9.2431.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
34

Jigo, Michael, et Marisa Carrasco. « Endogenous and exogenous covert attention differentially modulate second-order textures ». Journal of Vision 18, no 10 (1 septembre 2018) : 1259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/18.10.1259.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
35

Rohenkohl, Gustavo, Jennifer T. Coull et Anna C. Nobre. « Behavioural Dissociation between Exogenous and Endogenous Temporal Orienting of Attention ». PLoS ONE 6, no 1 (28 janvier 2011) : e14620. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014620.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
36

Chong, S. C., et R. Blake. « Exogenous and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry ». Journal of Vision 5, no 8 (1 septembre 2005) : 1045. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/5.8.1045.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
37

Ziegler, N. E., et D. Kerzel. « Exogenous and endogenous attention shifts during smooth pursuit eye movements ». Journal of Vision 5, no 8 (17 mars 2010) : 694. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/5.8.694.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
38

Hopfinger, Joseph B., et Vicki M. West. « Interactions between endogenous and exogenous attention on cortical visual processing ». NeuroImage 31, no 2 (juin 2006) : 774–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.049.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
39

Durand, Robert B., Manapon Limkriangkrai et Lucia Fung. « Exogenous and Endogenous Attention and the Convergence of Analysts’ Forecasts ». Journal of Behavioral Finance 20, no 2 (4 février 2019) : 154–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15427560.2018.1504783.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
40

Botta, Fabiano, Valerio Santangelo, Antonino Raffone, Juan Lupiáñez et Marta Olivetti Belardinelli. « Exogenous and endogenous spatial attention effects on visuospatial working memory ». Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 63, no 8 (août 2010) : 1590–602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470210903443836.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
41

Schmidt, T., et A. Seydell. « Modulation of cortical feedfoward dynamics by endogenous and exogenous attention ». Journal of Vision 6, no 6 (24 mars 2010) : 745. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/6.6.745.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
42

Tang, Xiaoyu, Jinglong Wu et Yong Shen. « The interactions of multisensory integration with endogenous and exogenous attention ». Neuroscience & ; Biobehavioral Reviews 61 (février 2016) : 208–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.11.002.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
43

Cohen, Michael A., Patrick Cavanagh, Marvin M. Chun et Ken Nakayama. « Response to Tsuchiya et al. : considering endogenous and exogenous attention ». Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16, no 11 (novembre 2012) : 528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.09.002.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
44

Rosen, Allyson C., Stephen M. Rao, Paolo Caffarra, Augusto Scaglioni, Julie A. Bobholz, Scott J. Woodley, Thomas A. Hammeke, Joseph M. Cunningham, Thomas E. Prieto et Jeffrey R. Binder. « Neural Basis of Endogenous and Exogenous Spatial Orienting : A Functional MRI Study ». Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11, no 2 (mars 1999) : 135–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/089892999563283.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Whole-brain functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to examine the neural substrates of internally (endogenous) and externally (exogenous) induced covert shifts of attention. Thirteen normal subjects performed three orienting conditions: endogenous (location of peripheral target predicted by a central arrow 80% of the time), exogenous (peripheral target preceded by a noninformative peripheral cue), and control (peripheral target preceded by noninformative central cue). Behavioral results indicated faster reaction times (RTs) for valid than for invalid trials for the endogenous condition but slower RTs for valid than for invalid trials for the exogenous condition (inhibition of return). The spatial extent and intensity of activation was greatest for the endogenous condition, consistent with the hypothesis that endogenous orienting is more effortful (less automatic) than exogenous orienting. Overall, we did not observe distinctly separable neural systems associated with the endogenous and exogenous orienting conditions. Both exogenous and endogenous orienting, but not the control condition, activated bilateral parietal and dorsal premotor regions, including the frontal eye fields. These results suggest a specific role for these regions in preparatory responding to peripheral stimuli. The right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (BA 46) was activated selectively by the endogenous condition. This finding suggests that voluntary, but not reflexive, shifts of attention engage working memory systems.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
45

Cansino, Selene. « The effects of endogenous and exogenus orienting of attention on source memory ». Acta de Investigación Psicológica 8, no 2 (31 août 2018) : 80–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/fpsi.20074719e.2018.2.07.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
The aim of this study was to determine the effects of endogenous and exogenous orienting of attention on episodic memory. Thirty healthy participants performed a cueing attention paradigm during encoding, in which images of common objects were presented either to the left or to the right of the center of the screen. Before the presentation of each image, three types of symbolic cues were displayed to indicate the location in which the stimuli would appear: valid cues to elicit endogenous orientation, invalid cues to prompt exogenous orientation and neutral or uncued trials. The participants’ task was to discriminate whether the images were symmetrical or not while fixating on the center of the screen to assure the manifestation of only covert attention mechanisms. Covert attention refers to the ability to orient attention by means of central control mechanisms alone, without head and eye movements. Trials with eye movements were excluded after inspection of eye-tracker recordings that were conducted throughout the task. During retrieval, participants conducted a source memory task in which they indicated the location where the images were presented during encoding. Memory for spatial context was superior during endogenous orientation than during exogenous orientation, whereas exogenous orientation was associated with a greater number of missed responses compared to the neutral trials. The formation of episodic memory representations with contextual details benefits from endogenous attention.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
46

Magosso, Elisa, Andrea Serino, Giuseppe di Pellegrino et Mauro Ursino. « Crossmodal Links between Vision and Touch in Spatial Attention : A Computational Modelling Study ». Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2010 (2010) : 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/304941.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Many studies have revealed that attention operates across different sensory modalities, to facilitate the selection of relevant information in the multimodal situations of every-day life. Cross-modal links have been observed either when attention is directed voluntarily (endogenous) or involuntarily (exogenous). The neural basis of cross-modal attention presents a significant challenge to cognitive neuroscience. Here, we used a neural network model to elucidate the neural correlates of visual-tactile interactions in exogenous and endogenous attention. The model includes two unimodal (visual and tactile) areas connected with a bimodal area in each hemisphere and a competition between the two hemispheres. The model is able to explain cross-modal facilitation both in exogenous and endogenous attention, ascribing it to an advantaged activation of the bimodal area on the attended side (via a top-down or bottom-up biasing), with concomitant inhibition towards the opposite side. The model suggests that a competitive/cooperative interaction with biased competition may mediate both forms of cross-modal attention.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
47

Hurst, Austin J., Michael A. Lawrence et Raymond M. Klein. « How Does Spatial Attention Influence the Probability and Fidelity of Colour Perception ? » Vision 3, no 2 (17 juin 2019) : 31. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision3020031.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Existing research has found that spatial attention alters how various stimulus properties are perceived (e.g., luminance, saturation), but few have explored whether it improves the accuracy of perception. To address this question, we performed two experiments using modified Posner cueing tasks, wherein participants made speeded detection responses to peripheral colour targets and then indicated their perceived colours on a colour wheel. In E1, cues were central and endogenous (i.e., prompted voluntary attention) and the interval between cues and targets (stimulus onset asynchrony, or SOA) was always 800 ms. In E2, cues were peripheral and exogenous (i.e., captured attention involuntarily) and the SOA varied between short (100 ms) and long (800 ms). A Bayesian mixed-model analysis was used to isolate the effects of attention on the probability and the fidelity of colour encoding. Both endogenous and short-SOA exogenous spatial cueing improved the probability of encoding the colour of targets. Improved fidelity of encoding was observed in the endogenous but not in the exogenous cueing paradigm. With exogenous cues, inhibition of return (IOR) was observed in both RT and probability at the long SOA. Overall, our findings reinforce the utility of continuous response variables in the research of attention.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
48

Casteau, Soazig, et Daniel T. Smith. « Associations and Dissociations between Oculomotor Readiness and Covert Attention ». Vision 3, no 2 (7 mai 2019) : 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision3020017.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
The idea that covert mental processes such as spatial attention are fundamentally dependent on systems that control overt movements of the eyes has had a profound influence on theoretical models of spatial attention. However, theories such as Klein’s Oculomotor Readiness Hypothesis (OMRH) and Rizzolatti’s Premotor Theory have not gone unchallenged. We previously argued that although OMRH/Premotor theory is inadequate to explain pre-saccadic attention and endogenous covert orienting, it may still be tenable as a theory of exogenous covert orienting. In this article we briefly reiterate the key lines of argument for and against OMRH/Premotor theory, then evaluate the Oculomotor Readiness account of Exogenous Orienting (OREO) with respect to more recent empirical data. These studies broadly confirm the importance of oculomotor preparation for covert, exogenous attention. We explain this relationship in terms of reciprocal links between parietal ‘priority maps’ and the midbrain oculomotor centres that translate priority-related activation into potential saccade endpoints. We conclude that the OMRH/Premotor theory hypothesis is false for covert, endogenous orienting but remains tenable as an explanation for covert, exogenous orienting.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
49

Ogmen, Haluk, Sevda Agaoglu et Bruno Breitmeyer. « How do Endogenous Attention, Exogenous Attention and Metacontrast Masking Operate in Controlling Stimulus Visibility ? » Journal of Vision 16, no 12 (1 septembre 2016) : 898. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/16.12.898.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
50

Şentürk, Gözde, Adam S. Greenberg et Taosheng Liu. « Erratum to : Saccade latency indexes exogenous and endogenous object-based attention ». Attention, Perception, & ; Psychophysics 78, no 6 (28 juin 2016) : 1817. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1165-9.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Vous pouvez également être intéressé par les bibliographies sur le sujet « Exogenous and endogenous attention » pour d’autres types de sources :
Thèses Livres
Nous offrons des réductions sur tous les plans premium pour les auteurs dont les œuvres sont incluses dans des sélections littéraires thématiques. Contactez-nous pour obtenir un code promo unique!

Vers la bibliographie