Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « Ex Officio Application of the choice-Of-Law rule »
Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres
Sommaire
Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « Ex Officio Application of the choice-Of-Law rule ».
À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.
Articles de revues sur le sujet "Ex Officio Application of the choice-Of-Law rule"
Krans, Bart. « EU Law and National Civil Procedure Law : An Invisible Pillar ». European Review of Private Law 23, Issue 4 (1 août 2015) : 567–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/erpl2015038.
Texte intégralCarrillo Pozo, Luis F. « Crisis matrimoniales, imperatividad de la norma de conflicto y Derecho extranjero = Marital crisis, imperativeness of the choice of law rule and Foreign Law ». CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL 10, no 2 (5 octobre 2018) : 249. http://dx.doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2018.4377.
Texte intégralSchebesta, Hanna. « Does the National Court Know European Law ? A Note on Ex Officio Application after Asturcom ». European Review of Private Law 18, Issue 4 (1 août 2010) : 847–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/erpl2010064.
Texte intégralVermulst, Edwin, et Edwin Vermulst. « Modernization of the EUs Trade Defence Instruments and the Law of Unintended Consequences ». Global Trade and Customs Journal 8, Issue 7/8 (1 juillet 2013) : 202–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2013028.
Texte intégralPereyó, José. « A Bridge too Far ». Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem 9, Issue 36 (1 décembre 2012) : 90–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/rba2012064.
Texte intégralZainal Faizin et Ahmad Junaidi. « Penerapan Hak Ex Officio Hakim dan Asas Ius Contra Legem dalam Perkara Perceraian dan Pembagian Harta Bersama di Pengadilan Agama Magetan Perspektif Hukum Progresif ». Journal of Economics, Law, and Humanities 1, no 1 (19 mai 2022) : 109–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.21154/jelhum.v1i1.535.
Texte intégralvan Dam, J. J., et J. A. R. van Eijsden. « Ex officio Application of EC Law by National Courts of Law in Tax Cases, Discretionary Authority or an Obligation ? » EC Tax Review 18, Issue 1 (1 février 2009) : 16–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/ecta2009003.
Texte intégralBieri, Sandra de Vito. « The application of EU law by arbitral tribunals seated in Switzerland ». ASA Bulletin 35, Issue 1 (1 mars 2017) : 55–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/asab2017005.
Texte intégralBlažo, Ondrej. « A New Regime on Protection of Public Procurement Against Foreign Subsidies Distorting the Internal Market : Mighty Paladin or Giant on the Feet of Clay ? » International and Comparative Law Review 21, no 2 (1 décembre 2021) : 138–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2021-0016.
Texte intégralTorp, Kristian, et Jakob B. Sørensen. « The Second Look in European Union Competition Law : A Scandinavian Perspective ». Journal of International Arbitration 34, Issue 1 (1 février 2017) : 35–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/joia2017003.
Texte intégralThèses sur le sujet "Ex Officio Application of the choice-Of-Law rule"
Françoise, Marylou. « L'office du juge en conflit de lois : Etude en droit de l'Union européenne ». Electronic Thesis or Diss., Lyon, 2021. http://www.theses.fr/2021LYSE3044.
Texte intégralThe development of uniform choice-of-law rules by the European Union accompanies the project of developing a European area of civil justice the aim of which is guaranteeing the predictability of disputes. The European standardization of choice-of-law rules has not gone along with a unified procedural regime. The internationality of the dispute and the implementation of the conflict rule from European sources consequently depend on internal procedural arrangements. Although the procedural statute of the choice-of-law rule justifies a strictly national treatment because of its procedural nature in traditional private international law, the heterogeneity of the procedural systems raises questions about the objectives pursued by the Union. The optional nature of the choice-of-law rule generated by national procedural treatment, in particular, contradicts the imperatives of uniformity and effectiveness required by the European standard. The creation of uniform conflict-of-law rules does not establish a common judicial practice on its own.To ensure the development of a common area of civil justice, the standardization of choice-of-law rules must go along with a general procedural framework for the procedural statute of the choice-of-law rule. This study suggests us to reflect on a model of a European judicial practice in conflict of laws, in the light of the ad hoc framework that already exists in mandatory provisions and parties’ autonomy. It should be generalized by systematizing an ex officio application of the choice-of-law rule by the judge while allowing the parties to come forward when the rule allows it
Moya, Djoleen. « L'autorité des règles de conflit de lois : réflexion sur l'incidence des considérations substantielles ». Thesis, Paris 1, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018PA01D061.
Texte intégralChoice-of-law rules do not all have the same authority. The parties, and even the judge, may be allowed to override the designation made by the conflict rule. The parties are sometimes free to depart, by convention, from the designated law (suppletory choice-of-law rules), sometimes bound by the designation made (imperative choice-of-law rules). The judge is sometimes obliged, sometimes free to raise ex officio the internationality of the dispute, and to deduce from it the application of the choice-of-law rule. Considering together such varied questions may be surprising, but it is the approach adopted by French case law. The authority of choice-of-law rules is defined jointly, according to substantive considerations. As a matter of example, an affiliation proceeding is, in French substantive law, a matter of public policy regarding someone’s family status, and deemed to concern an unwaivable right. Therefore, the applicable choice-of-law rule will be imperative and applied ex officio by the judge. Conversely, if the claim falls within a largely suppletory subject matter or relates to waivable rights, the applicable choice-of-law rule will be suppletory, and the judge will not be required to apply it ex officio. Therefore, the authority of choice-of-law rules is defined, with respect to both the parties and the judge, according to substantive considerations.However, this regime is no longer that of European private international law. Firstly, the European regulations have only defined the authority of their choice-of-law rules with respect to the parties, leaving it up to each Member State to determine their authority over the judge. Secondly, the European definition of their authority over the parties disregards any substantive consideration, and retains a whole set of suppletory choice-of-law rules, regardless of the subject-matter. Is case law justified in defining the authority of choice-of-law rules solely on the basis of substantive considerations ? No, because choice-of-law rules designate the applicable law according to choice-of-law considerations. However, one cannot, like the European legislator, exclude any substantive consideration. The supposition of choice-of-law rules concerns substantive law issues. Choice-of-law rules are, thus, devised according to substantive considerations. Therefore, if these alone cannot define the authority of choice-of-law rules, they cannot be totally ignored either
Chapitres de livres sur le sujet "Ex Officio Application of the choice-Of-Law rule"
Tilmann, Winfried. « Representation ». Dans Unified Patent Protection in Europe : A Commentary. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198755463.003.0093.
Texte intégral