Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « European Union – Enlargement – Public opinion »
Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres
Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « European Union – Enlargement – Public opinion ».
À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.
Articles de revues sur le sujet "European Union – Enlargement – Public opinion"
Timuş, Natalia. « The role of public opinion in European Union policy making : The case of European Union enlargement ». Perspectives on European Politics and Society 7, no 3 (septembre 2006) : 336–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15705850601056470.
Texte intégraldE VREESE, CLAES H., et HAJO G. BOOMGAARDEN. « Media Effects on Public Opinion about the Enlargement of the European Union* ». JCMS : Journal of Common Market Studies 44, no 2 (juin 2006) : 419–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00629.x.
Texte intégralTománková, Veronika. « Differentiated Support of the EU Enlargement in the Public Opinion : A Multivariate LISREL Analysis ». Geografie 112, no 1 (2007) : 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.37040/geografie2007112010001.
Texte intégralDursun-Ozkanca, Oya. « European Union Enlargement and British Public Opinion : The Agenda-Setting Power of the Press ». Perspectives on European Politics and Society 12, no 2 (1 juin 2011) : 139–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15705854.2011.572642.
Texte intégralHerța, Laura-M., et Delia Pop-Flanja. « Public Perception on the Western Balkan States’ Accession to the EU. Social-Constructivist Interpretations ». Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Studia Europaea 66, no 2 (décembre 2021) : 135–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.24193/subbeuropaea.2021.2.07.
Texte intégralDudášová, Marianna. « Globalisation Scepticism in the Visegrad Countries ». Ekonomické rozhľady – Economic Review 50, no 4 (15 décembre 2021) : 429–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.53465/er.2644-7185.2021.4.429-451.
Texte intégralTodorovic-Lazic, Jelena. « Challenges of the enlargement policy in the light of European Union transformation : Is the rise of Euroscepticism in Serbia inevitable ? » Medjunarodni problemi 71, no 1 (2019) : 80–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/medjp1901080t.
Texte intégralFöldesi, Gyöngyi. « Can We Talk about European Public Policy in the Field of Sport ? » Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research 47, no 1 (1 décembre 2009) : 28–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10141-009-0029-6.
Texte intégralNeunreither, Karlheinz. « The European Union in Nice : A Minimalist Approach to a Historic Challenge ». Government and Opposition 36, no 2 (avril 2001) : 184–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1477-7053.00061.
Texte intégralMKRTCHYAN, LIKA. « The Border-making Policy of the Europe-an Union : Eastern Enlargement ». Journal of Education Culture and Society 3, no 2 (12 janvier 2020) : 7–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.15503/jecs20122.7.18.
Texte intégralThèses sur le sujet "European Union – Enlargement – Public opinion"
Jeannet, Anne-Marie. « Immigration and public opinion in Europe : the case of the 2004 enlargement ». Thesis, University of Oxford, 2014. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:acb77b39-d90d-427b-afa6-bfe6a406a8e3.
Texte intégralBilgi, Seniz. « A Comparative Study Of The European Union ». Master's thesis, METU, 2007. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/3/12608588/index.pdf.
Texte intégralFERNANDES, Daniel. « Governments, public opinion, and social policy : change in Western Europe ». Doctoral thesis, European University Institute, 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/75046.
Texte intégralExamining Board: Prof. Ellen Immergut (EUI, Supervisor); Prof. Anton Hemerijck (EUI); Prof. Christoffer Green-Pedersen (Aarhus University); Prof. Evelyne Hübscher (Central European University)
This dissertation investigates how public opinion and government partisanship affect social policy. It brings an innovative perspective that links the idea of democratic representation to debates about the welfare state. The general claim made here is that social policy is a function of public and government preferences. This claim hinges on two critical premises. The first relates to the general mechanisms that underlie government representation. Politicians have electoral incentives to align their actions with what citizens want. They may respond to public opinion indirectly by updating their party agendas, which can serve as the basis for social policy decisions in case they get elected. They may also respond directly by introducing welfare reforms that react to shifts in public opinion during their mandates. The second premise concerns how citizens and politicians structure their preferences over welfare. These preferences fall alongside two dimensions. First, general attitudes about how much should the state intervene in the economy to reduce inequality and promote economic well-being (how much policy). Second, the specific preferences about which social programmes should get better funding (what kind of policy). The empirical analysis is split into three empirical chapters. Each explores different aspects of government representation in Western European welfare states. The first empirical chapter (Chapter 4) asks how governments shape social policy when facing severe pressures to decrease spending. It argues that governments strategically reduce spending on programmes that offer less visible and indirect benefits, as they are less likely to trigger an electoral backlash. The experience of the Great Recession is consistent with this claim. Countries that faced the most challenging financial constraints cut down social investment and services. Except for Greece, they all preserved consumption schemes. The second empirical chapter (Chapter 5) explores how public opinion affects government spending priorities in different welfare programmes. It expects government responsiveness to depend on public mood for more or less government activity and the most salient social issues at the time. Empirical evidence from old-age, healthcare and education issue-policy areas supports these claims. Higher policy mood and issue saliency is positively associated with increasing spending efforts. Public opinion does not appear to affect unemployment policies. vii The third empirical chapter (Chapter 6) examines how party preferences affect spending priorities in unemployment programmes. It claims that preferences on economic intervention in the economy and welfare recalibration affect different components of unemployment policy. Evidence from the past 20 years bodes well with these expectations. The generosity of compensatory schemes depends on economic preferences. The left invests more than the right. The funding of active labour-market policies depends on both preference dimensions. Among conventional parties, their funding follows the same patterns as compensatory schemes. Among recalibration parties, parties across the economic spectrum present comparable spending patterns.
Dan, Oana. « Public Opinion, National Party Positions, and the European Commission : Contours of the Public Sphere in the European Union ». Thesis, Harvard University, 2012. http://dissertations.umi.com/gsas.harvard:10373.
Texte intégralSociology
Williams, Christopher J. « Does Euroscepticism Matter ? the Effect of Public Opinion on Integration ». Thesis, University of North Texas, 2012. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc177264/.
Texte intégralSener, Hasan Engin. « Public Administration Reform In The Context Of The European Union Enlargement Process : The Hungarian And Turkish Cases ». Phd thesis, METU, 2008. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12609836/index.pdf.
Texte intégralCorbillon-Gulin, Ramon. « A study of how European Union IPRA practitioners viewed ethical issues : values, standards, social responsibility, and control ». Virtual Press, 1996. http://liblink.bsu.edu/uhtbin/catkey/1014808.
Texte intégralDepartment of Journalism
Zottarelli, Lisa K. « Coming in From the Cold : Integration into the European Union and Public Opinion on Democracy and the Market Economy in Central and Eastern Europe ». Thesis, University of North Texas, 2002. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc3099/.
Texte intégralSvensson, Jenny. « The Regulation of Rule-Following : Imitation and Soft Regulation in the European Union ». Doctoral thesis, Stockholm : School of Business, Stockholm University, 2009. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-26821.
Texte intégralRiester, Jessica Leigh Marks Gary. « Russian public opinion and its role in the security policy between Russia, the European Union, and NATO ». Chapel Hill, N.C. : University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2006. http://dc.lib.unc.edu/u?/etd,660.
Texte intégralTitle from electronic title page (viewed Oct. 10, 2007). "... in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Political Science." Discipline: Political Science; Department/School: Political Science.
Livres sur le sujet "European Union – Enlargement – Public opinion"
Haerpfer, Christian. Public opinion on European Union enlargement. Glasgow : University of Strathclyde, 2001.
Trouver le texte intégralSzczerbiak, Aleks. Public opinion and eastward enlargement : Explaining declining support for EU membership in Poland. Brighton : Sussex European Institute, 2000.
Trouver le texte intégralSzczerbiak, Aleks. Public opinion and eastward enlargement : Explaining declining support for EU membership in Poland. Brighton : Sussex European Institute, 2002.
Trouver le texte intégralCichowski, Rachel A. Choosing democracy : Citizen attitudes and the eastern enlargement of the European Union. San Domenico di Fiesole, Italy : European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre, 2000.
Trouver le texte intégralThe Europeanization of national polities ? : Citizenship and support in a post-enlargement union. Oxford : Oxford University Press, USA, 2012.
Trouver le texte intégralCommunities, Commission of the European. Eurobarometer : Public opinion in the European Union. Brussels : European Commission, Survey Research Unit, 1995.
Trouver le texte intégralCommission of the European Communities., dir. Eurobarometer : Public opinion in the European Union. Luxembourg : Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2000.
Trouver le texte intégralCommission of the European Communities. Directorate-General Audiovisual, Information, Communication and Culture., dir. Eurobarometer : Public opinion in the European Union. Brussels : Commission of the EuropeanCommunities, 1999.
Trouver le texte intégralCommission of the European Communities. Directorate-General Press and Communication., dir. Eurobarometer : Public opinion in the European Union. Brussels : Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2001.
Trouver le texte intégralCommission of the European Communities., dir. Eurobarometer : Public opinion in the European Union. Luxembourg : Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2000.
Trouver le texte intégralChapitres de livres sur le sujet "European Union – Enlargement – Public opinion"
McCormick, John. « Public Opinion ». Dans European Union Politics, 288–305. London : Macmillan Education UK, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-34391-7_18.
Texte intégralMcCormick, John. « Public Opinion ». Dans European Union Politics, 274–89. London : Macmillan Education UK, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-45340-2_18.
Texte intégralOlsen, Jonathan, et John McCormick. « Representing Public Opinion ». Dans The European Union, 196–214. Sixth edition. | Boulder, CO : Westview Press, 2016. | Previous editions entered under : McCormick, John, 1954- : Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429494512-13.
Texte intégralHix, Simon, et Bjørn Høyland. « Public Opinion ». Dans The Political System of the European Union, 105–29. London : Macmillan Education UK, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-34418-1_5.
Texte intégralOlsen, Jonathan. « Representing Public Opinion in the EU ». Dans The European Union, 166–80. Seventh edition. | New York, NY : Routledge, 2021. : Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429440724-10.
Texte intégralGuyomarch, Alain, Howard Machin et Ella Ritchie. « Parties and Public Opinion ». Dans France in the European Union, 73–103. London : Macmillan Education UK, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26584-8_4.
Texte intégralLaffan, Brigid, et Jane O’Mahony. « Referendums and Public Opinion ». Dans Ireland and the European Union, 105–31. London : Macmillan Education UK, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-04835-6_6.
Texte intégralSmith, M. L. « The European Connection and Public Opinion ». Dans Living with the European Union, 169–96. London : Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780333982501_9.
Texte intégralHix, Simon. « Public Opinion and Political Cleavages ». Dans The Political System of the European Union, 133–65. London : Macmillan Education UK, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27531-1_5.
Texte intégralEliasson, Leif Johan. « Transatlantic Trade Negotiatons, Civil Society Campaigns and Public Opinion ». Dans Lobbying in the European Union, 375–87. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98800-9_27.
Texte intégralActes de conférences sur le sujet "European Union – Enlargement – Public opinion"
Ballı, Esra, et Gülçin Güreşçi Pehlivan. « Economic Effects of European Neighborhood Policy on Countries ». Dans International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c04.00777.
Texte intégralPage, Douglas, et Ridvan Peshkopia. « Gauging the European Union Message Against the Death Penalty : Lessons from an Experimental Public Opinion Survey ». Dans University for Business and Technology International Conference. Pristina, Kosovo : University for Business and Technology, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.33107/ubt-ic.2017.323.
Texte intégralChiriţă, Otilia, Raluca Călin et George Călin. « The Development of the Administrative Capacity versus Citizens` Opinion in Romania ». Dans 3rd International Conference Global Ethics -Key of Sustainability (GEKoS). Lumen Publishing House, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.18662/lumproc/gekos2022/13.
Texte intégralAntanoviča, Agnija. « Sabiedrības viedokļa ietekme uz sieviešu politisko pārstāvniecību : Latvijas gadījums pasaules situācijas kontekstā ». Dans LU Studentu zinātniskā konference "Mundus et". LU Akadēmiskais apgāds, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.22364/lu.szk.2.rk.01.
Texte intégralZAWOJSKA, Aldona. « THE PROS AND CONS OF THE EU COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY ». Dans RURAL DEVELOPMENT. Aleksandras Stulginskis University, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.15544/rd.2017.158.
Texte intégral