Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « European Union countries – Politics and government – Philosophy »
Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres
Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « European Union countries – Politics and government – Philosophy ».
À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.
Articles de revues sur le sujet "European Union countries – Politics and government – Philosophy"
Sperber, Nathan. « The many lives of state capitalism : From classical Marxism to free-market advocacy ». History of the Human Sciences 32, no 3 (juillet 2019) : 100–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0952695118815553.
Texte intégralFinke, Daniel, et Annika Herbel. « Coalition Politics and Parliamentary Oversight in the European Union ». Government and Opposition 53, no 3 (19 septembre 2016) : 388–415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/gov.2016.28.
Texte intégralBarradas, Ricardo. « Financialization and Neoliberalism and the Fall in the Labor Share : A Panel Data Econometric Analysis for the European Union Countries ». Review of Radical Political Economics 51, no 3 (19 février 2019) : 383–417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0486613418807286.
Texte intégralİbrahim qızı Cəfərli, Ramilə. « Mechanisms for Cooperation of the European Union ». SCIENTIFIC WORK 15, no 2 (9 mars 2021) : 84–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.36719/2663-4619/63/84-87.
Texte intégralAbdul Aziz Khan Niazi, Tehmina Fiaz Qazi, Abdul Basit et Muhammad Zeeshan Shaukat. « Evaluation of Climate of Selected Sixty-six Countries using Grey Relational Analysis : Focus on Pakistan ». Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies 7, no 1 (26 janvier 2021) : 51–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.26710/jbsee.v7i1.1533.
Texte intégralSpahiu, Irma. « Government Transparency in Albania and the Role of the European Union ». European Public Law 21, Issue 1 (1 février 2015) : 109–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/euro2015006.
Texte intégralGarcia, Denise. « Shifting International Security Norms ». Ethics & ; International Affairs 31, no 2 (2017) : 235–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0892679417000090.
Texte intégralKhakhalkina, E. V. « EU Memory Politics in the Context of Understanding Decolonization and a Common European Identity ». Izvestiya of Altai State University, no 6(116) (18 décembre 2020) : 81–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.14258/izvasu(2020)6-14.
Texte intégralBrusis, Martin. « The Instrumental Use of European Union Conditionality : Regionalization in the Czech Republic and Slovakia ». East European Politics and Societies : and Cultures 19, no 2 (mai 2005) : 291–316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0888325404272063.
Texte intégralClements, Ben, Kyriaki Nanou et José Real-Dato. « Economic crisis and party responsiveness on the left–right dimension in the European Union ». Party Politics 24, no 1 (13 novembre 2017) : 52–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354068817736757.
Texte intégralThèses sur le sujet "European Union countries – Politics and government – Philosophy"
Luedtke, Adam. « Fortress Europe or spillover ? : immigration politics and policy at the European level ». Thesis, McGill University, 1997. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=20441.
Texte intégralREH, Christine. « The Politics of Preparation : delegated decisions, arguing and constitutional choice in Europe ». Doctoral thesis, European University Institute, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/10475.
Texte intégralExamining Board: Prof. Adrienne Héritier (EUI, Florence) ; Prof. Frank Schimmelfennig (ETH, Zürich) ; Prof. Andy Smith (IEP, Bordeaux) ; Prof. Helen Wallace (EUI/RSCAS, Florence)
PDF of thesis uploaded from the Library digital archive of EUI PhD theses
This project investigates a ubiquitous yet under-studied phenomenon in national, European and global politics: delegated preparation, defined as those negotiations through which civil servants or experts "pre-cook" political choice in multi-level decision-processes. While examples are legion-reaching from legislative drafting in national ministries to the Committee of Permanent Representatives (COREPER) in the European Union (EU)- the project focuses on preparation in complex international negotiations, and chooses EU Intergovernmental Conferences (IGCs) as empirical case. Claiming that a look beyond the tip of the "decision-iceberg" will gain us deeper insights into how and by whom Europe has been constitutionalised, I tackle two wider questions: 1) What is preparation and what can it do? and 2) Under what conditions will preparation be effective? Linked to an understanding of international negotiation as a "thick" social process, I argue, first, that the key to preparatory effectiveness lies in a particular set of collective resources as a necessary condition, and in consensual preagreement as both necessary and sufficient. Second, with effective pre-decision-making thus hinging upon successful delegated arguing, a set of scope conditions favourable to persuasion are singled out. These include 1) a familiar, iterative and insulated social context as a pre-condition for the non-distortive use of arguments; 2) an issue's complexity as facilitating the resonance of expertise and novel ideas; and 3) a macronorm's constitutional-systemic nature as favouring factual arguments linked to the international system. The hypotheses are tested on the "Group of Government Representatives" (GoR), with units of observation chosen from the Amsterdam and Nice IGCs according to variation of issue complexity and constitutional-systemic nature. Process-tracing of five issues: the communitarisation of free movement, the integration of Schengen and the institutionalisation of flexibility (Amsterdam), as well as Commission reform and Council votes (Nice) confirms that delegated preparation plays a key role even in the "bastion of high politics" that is EU reform. Yet, empirical evidence shows that persuasion is less prominent than expected, and uncovers alternative mechanisms behind effective preparation,in particular accommodation, depoliticisation and systemic compensation.
Prosser, Christopher. « Rethinking representation and European integration ». Thesis, University of Oxford, 2015. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:1f596c7e-bfb9-43ff-b3e8-2de716f234ec.
Texte intégralCarey, Sean D. (Sean Damien). « A Political and Macroeconomic Explanation of Public Support for European Integration ». Thesis, University of North Texas, 1997. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc278919/.
Texte intégralFERNANDES, Daniel. « Governments, public opinion, and social policy : change in Western Europe ». Doctoral thesis, European University Institute, 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/75046.
Texte intégralExamining Board: Prof. Ellen Immergut (EUI, Supervisor); Prof. Anton Hemerijck (EUI); Prof. Christoffer Green-Pedersen (Aarhus University); Prof. Evelyne Hübscher (Central European University)
This dissertation investigates how public opinion and government partisanship affect social policy. It brings an innovative perspective that links the idea of democratic representation to debates about the welfare state. The general claim made here is that social policy is a function of public and government preferences. This claim hinges on two critical premises. The first relates to the general mechanisms that underlie government representation. Politicians have electoral incentives to align their actions with what citizens want. They may respond to public opinion indirectly by updating their party agendas, which can serve as the basis for social policy decisions in case they get elected. They may also respond directly by introducing welfare reforms that react to shifts in public opinion during their mandates. The second premise concerns how citizens and politicians structure their preferences over welfare. These preferences fall alongside two dimensions. First, general attitudes about how much should the state intervene in the economy to reduce inequality and promote economic well-being (how much policy). Second, the specific preferences about which social programmes should get better funding (what kind of policy). The empirical analysis is split into three empirical chapters. Each explores different aspects of government representation in Western European welfare states. The first empirical chapter (Chapter 4) asks how governments shape social policy when facing severe pressures to decrease spending. It argues that governments strategically reduce spending on programmes that offer less visible and indirect benefits, as they are less likely to trigger an electoral backlash. The experience of the Great Recession is consistent with this claim. Countries that faced the most challenging financial constraints cut down social investment and services. Except for Greece, they all preserved consumption schemes. The second empirical chapter (Chapter 5) explores how public opinion affects government spending priorities in different welfare programmes. It expects government responsiveness to depend on public mood for more or less government activity and the most salient social issues at the time. Empirical evidence from old-age, healthcare and education issue-policy areas supports these claims. Higher policy mood and issue saliency is positively associated with increasing spending efforts. Public opinion does not appear to affect unemployment policies. vii The third empirical chapter (Chapter 6) examines how party preferences affect spending priorities in unemployment programmes. It claims that preferences on economic intervention in the economy and welfare recalibration affect different components of unemployment policy. Evidence from the past 20 years bodes well with these expectations. The generosity of compensatory schemes depends on economic preferences. The left invests more than the right. The funding of active labour-market policies depends on both preference dimensions. Among conventional parties, their funding follows the same patterns as compensatory schemes. Among recalibration parties, parties across the economic spectrum present comparable spending patterns.
PAOLINI, Giulia. « The legitimacy deficit of the European Union and the role of national parliaments ». Doctoral thesis, European University Institute, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/10445.
Texte intégralExamining Board: Prof. Morten Kelstrup, (University of Copenhagen) ; Prof. Peter Mair, (European University Institute) ; Prof. Gianfranco Pasquino, (University of Bologna) ; Prof. Philippe C. Schmitter, (EUI Professional Fellow)
PDF of thesis uploaded from the Library digital archive of EUI PhD theses
no abstract available
Li, Xin. « European identity, a case study ». Thesis, University of Macau, 2009. http://umaclib3.umac.mo/record=b2555548.
Texte intégralZhang, Lu. « Is the EU a social union ? :the function of common social policy for European integration ». Thesis, University of Macau, 2012. http://umaclib3.umac.mo/record=b2554777.
Texte intégralSCHULTE-CLOOS, Julia. « European integration and the surge of the populist radical right ». Doctoral thesis, European University Institute, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/63506.
Texte intégralExamining Board: Professor Hanspeter Kriesi, European University Institute (Supervisor); Professor Elias Dinas, European University Institute; Professor Liesbet Hooghe, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Professor Kai Arzheimer, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
Does European integration contribute to the rise of the radical right? This dissertation offers three empirical contributions that aid understanding the interplay between political integration within the European Union (EU) and the surge of the populist radical right across Europe. The first account studies the impact that the European Parliament (EP) elections have for the national fortune of the populist right. The findings of a country fixed-effects model leveraging variation in the European electoral cycle demonstrate that EP elections foster the domestic prospects of the radical right when national and EP elections are close in time. The second study demonstrates that the populist radical right cannot use the EP elections as a platform to socialise the most impressionable voters. The results of a regression discontinuity analysis highlight that the EP contest does not instil partisan ties to the political antagonists of the European idea. The third study shows that anti-European integration sentiments that existed prior to accession to the EU cast a long shadow in the present by contributing to the success of contemporary populist right actors. Relying on an original dataset entailing data on all EU accession referenda on the level of municipalities and exploiting variation within regions, the study demonstrates that those localities that were most hostile to the European project before even becoming part of the Union, today, vote in the largest numbers for the radical right. In synthesis, the dissertation approaches the relationship between two major current transformations of social reality: European integration and the surge of the radical right. The results highlight that contention around the issue of European integration provides a fertile ground for the populist radical right, helping to activate nationalistic and EU-hostile sentiments among parts of the European public.
Finck, Michèle. « Above and below the surface : two models of subnational autonomies in EU law ». Thesis, University of Oxford, 2015. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:60c9f0ae-3f2a-4701-a096-e8f9ce38b5f0.
Texte intégralLivres sur le sujet "European Union countries – Politics and government – Philosophy"
1970-, Diez Thomas, dir. European integration theory. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2004.
Trouver le texte intégral1970-, Diez Thomas, dir. European integration theory. 2e éd. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2009.
Trouver le texte intégral1970-, Chryssochoou Dimitris N., dir. A republic of Europeans : Civic potential in a liberal milieu. Cheltenham, UK : Edward Elgar, 2011.
Trouver le texte intégralFlexibility and European unification : The logic of differentiated integration. Lanham, Md : Rowman & Littlefield, 2006.
Trouver le texte intégralCosmopolitan government in Europe : Citizens and entrepreneurs in postnational politics. New York : Routledge, 2012.
Trouver le texte intégral1963-, Haahr Jens Henrik, dir. Governing Europe : Discourse, governmentality and European integration. New York : Routledge, 2005.
Trouver le texte intégralEuropolis : Constitutional patriotism beyond the nation-state. Manchester : Manchester University Press, 2006.
Trouver le texte intégralMichelle, Cini, dir. European Union politics. 2e éd. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2007.
Trouver le texte intégralNieves, Pérez-Solórzano Borragán, dir. European Union politics. 3e éd. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2010.
Trouver le texte intégralUsherwood, Simon McDougall. The European Union. Milton Park, Abingdon, [England] : Routledge, 2011.
Trouver le texte intégralChapitres de livres sur le sujet "European Union countries – Politics and government – Philosophy"
Michailidou, Asimina, Elisabeth Eike et Hans-Jörg Trenz. « Journalism, Truth and the Restoration of Trust in Democracy : Tracing the EU ‘Fake News’ Strategy ». Dans Europe in the Age of Post-Truth Politics, 53–75. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13694-8_4.
Texte intégralBakir, Vian, et Andrew McStay. « Defending the Civic Body from False Information Online ». Dans Optimising Emotions, Incubating Falsehoods, 205–46. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13551-4_8.
Texte intégralBache, Ian, Simon Bulmer, Stephen George et Owen Parker. « 11. The EU in Crisis (2009–) ». Dans Politics in the European Union, 182–96. Oxford University Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780199689668.003.0011.
Texte intégralDe Vries, Catherine E., Sara B. Hobolt, Sven-Oliver Proksch et Jonathan B. Slapin. « 12. Policy Outcomes in Europe ». Dans Foundations of European Politics, 211–32. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198831303.003.0012.
Texte intégralHopkin, Jonathan. « The New North-South Divide : Bailout Politics and the Return of the Left in Southern Europe ». Dans Anti-System Politics, 153–86. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190699765.003.0006.
Texte intégralThränhardt, Dietrich. « The Immigration System and the Rule of Law ». Dans The Oxford Handbook of German Politics, 323–38. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198817307.013.20.
Texte intégral