Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « Dual nationality – European Union countries »
Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres
Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « Dual nationality – European Union countries ».
À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.
Articles de revues sur le sujet "Dual nationality – European Union countries"
Schönwälder, Karen, et Triadafilos Triadafilopoulos. « A Bridge or Barrier to Incorporation ? Germany's 1999 Citizenship Reform in Critical Perspective ». German Politics and Society 30, no 1 (1 mars 2012) : 52–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.3167/gps.2012.300104.
Texte intégralGoodwin, Jeff. « Old Regimes and Revolutions in the Second and Third Worlds : A Comparative Perspective ». Social Science History 18, no 4 (1994) : 575–604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0145553200017168.
Texte intégralJessurun d’Oliveira, Hans Ulrich. « Iberian Nationality Legislation and Sephardic Jews ». European Constitutional Law Review 11, no 01 (mai 2015) : 13–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1574019615000036.
Texte intégrald’Oliveira, Hans Ulrich Jessurun. « Once again : Plural nationality ». Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 25, no 1 (février 2018) : 22–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1023263x17754020.
Texte intégralZhmurenko, V. « CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL INSTITUTION OF CITIZENSHIP (NATIONALITY) IN THE COUNTRIES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION ». International Law Almanac, no 24 (2020) : 115–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.32841/ila.2020.24.14.
Texte intégralTaroni, Catherine. « Union Citizenship as a Source of Rights ? Case C-434/09, Shirley McCarthy v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 5 May 2011, nyr ». Journal of Contemporary European Research 8, no 1 (23 février 2012) : 145–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v8i1.412.
Texte intégralBocková, Lucia, et Rudolf Kucharčík. « Citizenship by Investment - Latest Development in the European Union ». Politické vedy 25, no 4 (10 janvier 2023) : 69–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.24040/politickevedy.2022.25.4.69-108.
Texte intégralGaleano, Juan. « Latin Americans in Switzerland : Dual Citizenship, Gender and Labour Market Incorporation ». Migration Letters 19, no 2 (7 mars 2022) : 193–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.33182/ml.v19i2.1566.
Texte intégralKorneva, P. M. « Conflicting regulation of relations in the field of medical tourism : the experience of the European Union ». Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series : Law, no 65 (25 octobre 2021) : 364–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2021.65.66.
Texte intégralSong, byeong jun. « Higher education in the European Union : Characteristics and meaning of dual structure through Erasmus+ and Bologna Process ». Sookmyung institute of Global Governance 1, no 1 (30 juin 2022) : 63–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.56485/jous.2022.1.1.63.
Texte intégralThèses sur le sujet "Dual nationality – European Union countries"
Mojak, Karolina. « L'avenir du critère de la nationalité en droit international privé ». Thesis, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016USPCB191.
Texte intégralThe decline of the nationality in private international law is nowadays an undeniable reality. The impact of an almost unconditional mobility of European citizens and the emergence of other connecting factors in the personal law result in the weakening of the nationality link, despite its historical role in determining the law applied to an individual. The weakening is confirmed by the modern European legislation and case law. This study seems essential to understand the foundations of nationality as the connecting factor and takes into account the important changes of the nationality and its uncertainty. Indeed, the evolution of the European private international law led to the switch of the connecting factor from nationality toward territorial nexuses. Particular significance is put on the nexus of habitual residence, which is considered to be more efficient and less discriminatory, and is retained by the main European regulations and judgments, not only in case of international divorces or parental authority, but also according to such matters as legal capacity. Furthermore, the superiority of human rights appears to be the essential reason for the acknowledgement of individuals as the quasi-subjects of international law, which resulted in the decline of nationality as a connecting factor. Consequently, the principles of non-discrimination and personal autonomy impact the further fields of personal law, e.g. disunion and heritage. In the light of these new paradigms, it should be questioned if it is possible to overcome the decadence of the nationality and authorize its part in some matters of the European private international law, as it was regulated in the new heritage European regulation. For these reasons, this study propose a methodology that determines the reasons of the fall of nationality as the nexus of the private international law, both in the conflict of laws and in the conflict of jurisdictions, and provides some reflections on its irreversibility
HORVATH, Eniko. « Mandating identity : citizenship, kinship laws and plural nationality in the European Union ». Doctoral thesis, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/6372.
Texte intégralSupervisor: Prof. Bruno De Witte
PDF of thesis uploaded from the Library digitised archive of EUI PhD theses completed between 2013 and 2017
For over a century it has been the case that a person exists, at least for legal purposes, only after she has been recognized by the state. As a unique element of this acknowledgement, nationality has also been an essential component of individual identity. Now, under pressure from a variety of directions, the nature of the link between state and individual is changing, with as yet unclear implications and long-term effects. In this original and insightful analysis, Enikő Horváth focuses on three processes of legal evolution in Europe that affect the meaning of membership and individual identity: the increasing salience of supranational ‘culture’ and rights; ‘kinship’ legislation privileging non-nationals with linguistic, cultural, and ethnic ties to a given state; and the emergence of plural nationality as an acceptable (and even welcome) phenomenon. The author’s treatment is notable for its informed appreciation of both the content of relevant European and national laws and the ways in which these laws are embedded in particular social and political frameworks. In addition to extending the legal theory on citizenship and nationality, the analysis draws on sociology, social psychology, and political theory to anchor its insights and recommendations. After two in-depth chapters introducing the complexities of the subject matter, three distinct but interwoven chapters show how each of the three processes has unfolded in a given context, offer detailed explanations and suggestions as to why each development has occurred in the manner that it has, and discuss the legal, political, and sociological issues raised by the particular development. A comprehensive reference section with extensive lists of laws, cases, and scholarship concludes the volume. It is likely that this dissertation will come to be recognized as a foundational work in the legal analysis of the concept of ‘cultural identity’, and especially its role in setting norms of membership, as that way of seeing the world becomes ever more clearly defined in coming decades. It is sure to be not only studied and cited by academics and legal theorists, but of special value also to policymakers in the areas of nationality and citizenship.
VONK, Olivier. « Dual nationality in the European Union : a study on changing norms in public and private international law and in the municipal laws of four EU member state ». Doctoral thesis, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/15386.
Texte intégralExamining Board: Rainer Baubock (EUI); Gerard-René De Groot (Universiteit Maastricht); Marie-Ange Moreau (Supervisor, EUI); Bruno Nascimbene (Università degli Studi di Milano)
PDF of thesis uploaded from the Library digital archive of EUI PhD theses
The main objective of this study is to examine the phenomenon of dual nationality in the European Union (EU), particularly against the background of the status of European citizenship - a status that is linked to the nationality of each EU Member State (Article 20(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union provides that ‘citizenship of the Union shall be additional to and not replace national citizenship’). The study consists of two parts. The first part (Chapters 1 and 2) sets out the approach towards (dual) nationality in Private International Law and EU Law, in particular by analyzing the case law of the European Court of Justice (ECJ). The second part (Chapters 3- 6) consists of an overview of the dual nationality regimes in four EU Member States - France, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain -, and their possible effects on the EU as a whole. Chapter 2 of the thesis is entitled the ‘intra-EU context’, since it primarily deals with the ECJ’s approach towards a dual nationality consisting of two Member State nationalities. The country reports, on the other hand, deal with the ‘extra-EU context’ because the dual nationality policies of the countries under consideration predominantly affect non-Member State nationals. Thus, France and the Netherlands have for some time already faced the question how to integrate the (Muslim) immigrant population; Italy and Spain have long since adopted a system of preferential treatment for (Latin American) former emigrants and their descendants. The country reports demonstrate how dual nationality is used (or rejected) in these four countries. Finally, the question whether the EU should in time acquire (limited) competence in the field of European nationality law is one of the major themes of this study. Regardless of one’s stance on this question, it must be readily admitted that the subject of Member State autonomy in nationality law is becoming ever more salient with the enlargement of the Union and the growing relevance of European citizenship in the case law of the ECJ. In the opinion of this author, the study shows that the almost absolute autonomy of Member States in the field of nationality law is becoming increasingly problematic for the EU as a whole. Based inter alia on the findings from the country reports, this thesis takes the position that there is arguably a need for the (minimum) harmonization of European nationality laws.
DUMBRAVA, Costica. « Nationality, citizenship and ethno-cultural membership : preferential admission policies of EU countries ». Doctoral thesis, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/26444.
Texte intégralExamining Board: Professor Rainer Bauböck (European University Institute); Professor Ruth Rubio Marín (European University Institute); Professor Joseph Carens (University of Toronto); Professor David Owen (University of Southampton).
In this thesis, I analyse justifications for preferential admission to citizenship based upon ethno-cultural grounds. My point of departure is the puzzling observation that, in matters of membership, states not only differentiate between citizens and foreigners, but also between different categories of foreigners, as well as between different categories of citizens. In the first part of this work, I explore possible justifications for boundaries of membership. I look into arguments of justice, nationalism, liberalism and democracy in order to identify principles for demarcating boundaries and for assessing various claims of inclusion/exclusion. In the second part, I address more specific questions related to the regulation of admission to citizenship. For this purpose, I examine a set of concrete rules of citizenship presently enforced by 27 EU countries. My proposal is to overcome the boundary problem by shifting the focus from the constitution of the boundary towards policies of boundary making. I affirm the principle of general openness of membership that is intended to provide normative corrections to the actual structure of boundaries. Against the common view that perceives citizenship as a fruit that is soft on the inside and hard on the outside, I argue that citizenship should be seen as soft on the inside and even softer on the outside. In order to respond to different claims of admission, I suggest breaking up the unitary concept of citizenship and distinguishing between legal, political, and identity memberships. This proposal is not meant to weaken or devaluate citizenship, but to reaffirm its essentially political value. By rejecting ideas of automatic and inherited citizenship and by insisting upon democratic recognition and commitment to political membership, I aim at recasting admission to citizenship as a transformative process through which individuals not merely receive membership but become members in a political community.
PAGER, Sean A. « Strictness vs. discretion : the European Court of Justice's dual vision of gender equality ». Doctoral thesis, 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/5656.
Texte intégralPORCEDDA, Maria Grazia. « Data protection and the prevention of cybercrime : a dual role for security policy in the EU ? » Doctoral thesis, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/26594.
Texte intégralAward date: 13 February 2012
PDF of thesis uploaded from the Library digital archive of EUI PhD theses
Cybercrime and cyber-security are attracting increasing attention, both for the relevance of Critical Information Infrastructure to the national economy, and the interplay of the policies tackling them with ‘ICT sensitive’ liberties, such as privacy and data protection. As such, the subject falls in the ‘security vs. privacy’ debate. The objective of this study is twofold. On the one hand, it is descriptive: it aims to cast light on the (legal substantive) nature of, and relationship between, cybercrime and cyber security, which are currently ‘terms of hype’. On the other, it explores the possibility of reconciling data protection and privacy with the prevention of cybercrime and the pursuit of a cyber-security policy, and therefore wishes to explore causation. The latter is a subset of the wider question of whether it is possible to build ‘human rights by design’, i.e. a security policy that reconciles both security and human rights. I argue that narrow or online crimes and broad or off-line crimes are profoundly different in terms of underlying logics while facing the same procedural challenges, and that only narrow cybercrime pertains to cyber-security, understood as a policy. Yet, the current policy debate is focussing too much on broad cybercrimes, thus biasing the debate over the best means to tackle ICT-based crimes and challenging the liberties involved. I then claim that the implementation of data protection principles in a cyber-security policy can act as a proxy to reduce cyber threats, and in particular (narrow) cybercrime, provided that the following caveats are respected: i) we privilege a technical computer security notion; ii) we update the data protection legislation (in particular the understanding of personal data); and iii) we adopt a core-periphery approach to human rights. The study focuses on the EU. Due to time constraints, the interaction between privacy and data protection and other liberties involved, as well as purely procedural issues are outside of the scope of this research.
SCHUTZE, Robert. « From dual to cooperative federalism : the changing structure of the legislative function in the European Union ». Doctoral thesis, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/4783.
Texte intégralExamining board: Prof. Gráinne de Búrca (Supervisor, European University Institute) ; Prof. Neil Walker (European University Institute) ; Prof. Stephen Weatherhill (Oxford University) ; Prof. Marise Cremona (University of London)
PDF of thesis uploaded from the Library digitised archive of EUI PhD theses completed between 2013 and 2017
What is the federal philosophy inspiring the structure of European law? The federal principle stands for constitutional arrangements that find "unity in diversity". The two most influential manifestations of the federal principle emerged under the names of "dual" and "cooperative" federalism in the constitutional history of the United States of America. Dual federalism is based on the idea that the federal government and the State governments are co-equals and each is legislating in a separate sphere. Cooperative federalism, on the other hand, stands for the thought that both governments legislate in the same sphere. They are hierarchically arranged and complement each other in solving a social problem. Can the European Union be understood in federal terms? The book's General Part introduces three constitutional traditions of the federal idea. Following the American tradition, the European Union is defined as a Federation of States as it stands on the "middle ground" between international and national law. But what federal philosophy has the European Union followed? The Special Part of the dissertation investigates the structure of European law. Three arguments are advanced to show the evolution of the European legal order from dual to cooperative federalism. The first looks at the decline of constitutional exclusivity on the part of the Member States and the European Union. For almost all objects of government, the Union and its States operate in a universe of shared powers. The second argument analyzes the decline of legislative exclusivity. European and national legislation - increasingly - complement each other to solve a social problem. The third argument describes the "constitutionalisation" of cooperative federalism in the form of the principle of subsidiarity and the idea of complementary competences. A final Chapter is dedicated to Europe's foreign affairs federalism. It analyzes, whether the external sphere must be regarded as subject to different constitutional or federal principles. The dissertation concludes that cooperative federalism will benefit both levels of government - the Union and the Member States - as the constitutional mechanism of uniform European standards complemented by diverse national standards best expresses the federal idea of "unity in diversity".
Livres sur le sujet "Dual nationality – European Union countries"
Devorah, Kalekin-Fishman, et Pitkänen Pirkko 1954-, dir. An emerging institution ? : Multiple citizenship in Europe, views of officials. Bern : Peter Lang, 2008.
Trouver le texte intégralHorváth, Enikö. Mandating identity : Citizenship, kinship laws and plural nationality in the European Union. Alphen aan den Rijn : Kluwer Law International, 2008.
Trouver le texte intégralHorváth, Enikö. Mandating identity : Citizenship, kinship laws and plural nationality in the European Union. Alphen aan den Rijn : Kluwer Law International, 2008.
Trouver le texte intégralEnforcing European Union law on exports of dual-use goods. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2009.
Trouver le texte intégralWetter, Anna. Enforcing European Union law on exports of dual-use goods. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2009.
Trouver le texte intégralFrom dual to cooperative federalism : The changing structure of European law. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2009.
Trouver le texte intégralSchütze, Robert. From dual to cooperative federalism : The changing structure of European law. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2009.
Trouver le texte intégralRainer, Bauböck, dir. Acquisition and loss of nationality : Policies and trends in 15 European states. Amsterdam : Amsterdam University Press, 2006.
Trouver le texte intégralBeyond the myth of nationality : A study of the networks of European Commission officials. Delft : Eburon, 2007.
Trouver le texte intégralDual nationality in the European Union : A study on changing norms in public and private international law and in the municipal laws of four EU member states. Leiden : Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2012.
Trouver le texte intégralChapitres de livres sur le sujet "Dual nationality – European Union countries"
Vintila, Daniela, et Jean-Michel Lafleur. « Migration and Access to Welfare Benefits in the EU : The Interplay between Residence and Nationality ». Dans IMISCOE Research Series, 1–32. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51241-5_1.
Texte intégralJung, Philipp Roman. « Multinational Migration in the Global South : Complex and Non-linear Trajectories of Senegalese Migrants in Brazil ». Dans IMISCOE Research Series, 159–78. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12503-4_8.
Texte intégral« Preliminary Material ». Dans Dual Nationality in the European Union, i—xiii. Brill | Nijhoff, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004227217_001.
Texte intégral« General Introduction ». Dans Dual Nationality in the European Union, 1–8. Brill | Nijhoff, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004227217_002.
Texte intégral« I General Observations on (Dual) Nationality and its Role in Municipal and International Law ». Dans Dual Nationality in the European Union, 9–114. Brill | Nijhoff, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004227217_003.
Texte intégral« II The Role of Dual Nationality in Private International Law and EU Law : The Intra-EU Context ». Dans Dual Nationality in the European Union, 115–63. Brill | Nijhoff, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004227217_004.
Texte intégral« Introductory Remarks on the Country Reports ». Dans Dual Nationality in the European Union, 165–67. Brill | Nijhoff, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004227217_005.
Texte intégral« III France ». Dans Dual Nationality in the European Union, 169–203. Brill | Nijhoff, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004227217_006.
Texte intégral« IV The Netherlands ». Dans Dual Nationality in the European Union, 205–47. Brill | Nijhoff, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004227217_007.
Texte intégral« V Italy ». Dans Dual Nationality in the European Union, 249–79. Brill | Nijhoff, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004227217_008.
Texte intégral