Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « Dialectical argumentation »
Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres
Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « Dialectical argumentation ».
À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.
Articles de revues sur le sujet "Dialectical argumentation"
Kaldjärv, Merle. « PRAGMA-DIALECTICS ON THE BASIS OF STATE EXAMINATION COMPOSITIONS ». Problems of Education in the 21st Century 38, no 1 (20 décembre 2011) : 37–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.33225/pec/11.38.37.
Texte intégralBlair, J. Anthony, et Ralph H. Johnson. « Argumentation as dialectical ». Argumentation 1, no 1 (1987) : 41–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00127118.
Texte intégralvan Eemeren, Frans H., et Peter Houtlosser. « The study of argumentation as normative pragmatics ». Pragmatics and Cognition 15, no 1 (11 mai 2007) : 161–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pc.15.1.11eem.
Texte intégralMacagno, Fabrizio. « Dialectical Relevance and Dialogical Context in Walton’s Pragmatic Theory ». Informal Logic 28, no 2 (5 juin 2008) : 102. http://dx.doi.org/10.22329/il.v28i2.542.
Texte intégralSTRANIERI, ANDREW, JOHN ZELEZNIKOW et JOHN YEARWOOD. « Argumentation structures that integrate dialectical and non-dialectical reasoning ». Knowledge Engineering Review 16, no 4 (décembre 2001) : 331–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0269888901000248.
Texte intégralLinqiong, Yan. « A pragma-dialectical approach to governmental crisis communication ». Argumentative Discourse in Contemporary China 6, no 3 (4 décembre 2017) : 315–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jaic.17003.yan.
Texte intégralKamariah, Kamariah, Kisyani Laksono et Agusniar Dian Savitri. « Potential Topics as Discourse Shapers Argumentation The Forum Holds a Talk With the Theme of the Covid-19 Pandemic : Pragma-dialectical Studies ». International Journal Of Education, Social Studies, And Management (IJESSM) 3, no 1 (7 février 2023) : 28–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.52121/ijessm.v3i1.131.
Texte intégralDudash, Tamara. « Dialectical Approach to Legal Arguing and Legal Argumentation ». Philosophy of law and general theory of law, no 2 (22 décembre 2021) : 145–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.21564/2707-7039.2.242855.
Texte intégralBletsas, Marina. « Paroemiological argumentation in Italian and French journalistic discourse ». Journal of Argumentation in Context 11, no 2 (6 octobre 2022) : 180–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jaic.21003.ble.
Texte intégralGarssen, Bart. « Une réaction à la critique depuis les marges épistémologiques ». Informal Logic 43, no 4 (21 janvier 2024) : 527–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.22329/il.v43i4.8415.
Texte intégralThèses sur le sujet "Dialectical argumentation"
Zsembery, Celeste Lloyd. « Rhetoric in Dialectical Behavior Therapy : Healing Minds Through Argumentation ». BYU ScholarsArchive, 2012. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/3093.
Texte intégralStrass, Hannes. « Approximating Operators and Semantics for Abstract Dialectical Frameworks ». Universitätsbibliothek Leipzig, 2013. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:15-qucosa-102943.
Texte intégralAl-Rikabi, A. A. « A revised pragma-dialectical approach to political argumentation in the media ». Thesis, University of Salford, 2018. http://usir.salford.ac.uk/47928/.
Texte intégralHietanen, Mika. « Paul's argumentation in Galatians : a pragma-dialectical analysis of Gal. 3.1-5.12 / ». Helsinki : Åbo Akademi, 2005. http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb40980911t.
Texte intégralOuerdane, Wassila. « Multiple criteria decision aiding : a dialectical perspective ». Paris 9, 2009. https://bu.dauphine.psl.eu/fileviewer/index.php?doc=2009PA090075.
Texte intégralWe propose in this thesis to adopt tools and concepts of argumentation theory in a decision aiding process: an interaction between, at least, an expert and a decision maker, where the main objective of this process is to reach a consensus between the two participants. Our ambitions through this work is twofold: (i) enhance decision support capabilities of the analyst representing explicitly and accountably the reasons for which he recommend (or not) a solution (if any); and (ii) Enhance decision support capabilities of an (semi) automatic device to handle (at least partially) the dialogue with the user. Thus, first, we propose to specify in an argumentative terms the steps involved in a multiple criteria evaluation process, a phase of the decision aiding process. To do that, we construct a hierarchical structure where we identify three levels of argument schemes that are embedded. The objective is to make explicit assumptions that are hidden in such a process, hence allowing meaningful explanations. Second, we propose to show that by relying on tools of argumentation such as acceptability function, critical questions, we facilitate the revision/update occurring during such a process. To do that, we initiate a systematic study which aims at constituting a significant step forward for forthcoming decision-aiding tools. The kind of system that we foresee here would allow, among others,: (i) to present a recommendation that can be explicitly justified; (ii) to revise any piece of reasoning involved in this process, and to inform of the consequences of such moves by presenting, for instance, graphically the exchanged arguments
Straß, Hannes, et Johannes Peter Wallner. « Analyzing the Computational Complexity of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks via Approximation Fixpoint Theory ». Universitätsbibliothek Leipzig, 2014. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:15-qucosa-129614.
Texte intégralBortoletto, Adriana [UNESP]. « Temas sociocientíficos : análise dos processos argumentativos no contexto escolar ». Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/90948.
Texte intégralCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
O objetivo do presente trabalho foi explorar e analisar o engajamento discursivo, assim como as concepções de ciência, tecnologia, sociedade e ambiente, de alunos de um curso técnico durante os processos argumentativos em sala de aula. Para realização da proposta foi necessária a elaboração de um minicurso intitulado de Eficiência Energética. o material didático era composto por vídeos, textos da área e situações problemas, os quais envolviam as dimensões científica, social, política, tecnológica e ambiental. Para a análise dos dados utilizou-se da abordagem metodológica da pragmadialética e com base nessa perspectiva buscou-se analisar os atos de fala de cada participante, como estes interagiam um para com o outro, os pontos de vista defendidos individualmente, assim como as justificativas desenvolvidas em cada um destes e os estágios pelo qual a discussão passou. Neste contexto, percebemos indícios de redução da socialização comunicativa e, por conseguinte do engajamento discursivo. Esse interesse estratégico já denuncia que não houve uma simetria de oportunidade de falas. Outro ponto importante a ser observado é o contexto superficial de perfuntas e respostas e que, mesmo com as tentativas de incentivar a tematização dos seus atos de falas essas recaem em teorizações estratégicas de um ou mais alunos. Ao concebermos que uso da linguagem possui um ato intencional, em determinado contexto, o protagonista necessita entender que possui um compromisso público ao uso, e compreender que há necessidade de se relacionar com as pessoas daquele contexto. De fato, esses fundamentos são princípios básicos das interações sociais entre os indivíduos. Quanto às relações CTSA os alunos reconhecem o impacto que os artefatos tecnológicos podem provocar, na sociedade, perdas nas tradições culturais, na criatividade, além do banimento das interações sociais
The objective of this study was to explore and analyze the discursive engagement of students in a technical course in the argumentative process in the classroom. For realization of the proposal was necessary to prepare a mini-course on Energy Efficiency. The material consisted of vídeos, texts of the area problems and situations, which envolved the dimensions scientific, economic, social, political, environmental and technology. For data analysis was used to approch the pragma-dialetical perspective and based on that sought to examine the acts of speech of each participant as they interact with one another, the views held by each, thus as justifictions developed by each of the stages and for which the discussion started. In this context, we observe evidence of reduced communicative socialization and therefore discursive engagement. Another important point to note is the superficial context of questions and answers, and that even with attempts to promote explanations about the themes, their speech acts fall into one or more strategic actions of students. The strategic interest already complained that there wasn't symmetry of opportunities to talk. We understand that language use has an intentional act, in certain contexts, the protagonist needs to understand that has a public commitment to use, and understand that there is a need to relate to people in that context. In fact, these fundamentals are basic principles of social interactions among individuals. About CTSA relations students recognize the impact that technological artifacts may result in society, losses in cultural traditions, creativity, and the banishment of social interactions
Bortoletto, Adriana. « Temas sociocientíficos : análise dos processos argumentativos no contexto escolar / ». Bauru : [s.n.], 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/90948.
Texte intégralBanca: Carmen Roselaine Farias
Banca: Jair Lopes Junior
Resumo: O objetivo do presente trabalho foi explorar e analisar o engajamento discursivo, assim como as concepções de ciência, tecnologia, sociedade e ambiente, de alunos de um curso técnico durante os processos argumentativos em sala de aula. Para realização da proposta foi necessária a elaboração de um minicurso intitulado de Eficiência Energética. o material didático era composto por vídeos, textos da área e situações problemas, os quais envolviam as dimensões científica, social, política, tecnológica e ambiental. Para a análise dos dados utilizou-se da abordagem metodológica da pragmadialética e com base nessa perspectiva buscou-se analisar os atos de fala de cada participante, como estes interagiam um para com o outro, os pontos de vista defendidos individualmente, assim como as justificativas desenvolvidas em cada um destes e os estágios pelo qual a discussão passou. Neste contexto, percebemos indícios de redução da socialização comunicativa e, por conseguinte do engajamento discursivo. Esse interesse estratégico já denuncia que não houve uma simetria de oportunidade de falas. Outro ponto importante a ser observado é o contexto superficial de perfuntas e respostas e que, mesmo com as tentativas de incentivar a tematização dos seus atos de falas essas recaem em teorizações estratégicas de um ou mais alunos. Ao concebermos que uso da linguagem possui um ato intencional, em determinado contexto, o protagonista necessita entender que possui um compromisso público ao uso, e compreender que há necessidade de se relacionar com as pessoas daquele contexto. De fato, esses fundamentos são princípios básicos das interações sociais entre os indivíduos. Quanto às relações CTSA os alunos reconhecem o impacto que os artefatos tecnológicos podem provocar, na sociedade, perdas nas tradições culturais, na criatividade, além do banimento das interações sociais
Abstract: The objective of this study was to explore and analyze the discursive engagement of students in a technical course in the argumentative process in the classroom. For realization of the proposal was necessary to prepare a mini-course on Energy Efficiency. The material consisted of vídeos, texts of the area problems and situations, which envolved the dimensions scientific, economic, social, political, environmental and technology. For data analysis was used to approch the pragma-dialetical perspective and based on that sought to examine the acts of speech of each participant as they interact with one another, the views held by each, thus as justifictions developed by each of the stages and for which the discussion started. In this context, we observe evidence of reduced communicative socialization and therefore discursive engagement. Another important point to note is the superficial context of questions and answers, and that even with attempts to promote explanations about the themes, their speech acts fall into one or more strategic actions of students. The strategic interest already complained that there wasn't symmetry of opportunities to talk. We understand that language use has an intentional act, in certain contexts, the protagonist needs to understand that has a public commitment to use, and understand that there is a need to relate to people in that context. In fact, these fundamentals are basic principles of social interactions among individuals. About CTSA relations students recognize the impact that technological artifacts may result in society, losses in cultural traditions, creativity, and the banishment of social interactions
Mestre
Bartocci, Barbara. « Dialectical reasoning and topical argument in the middle ages : an inquiry into the commentaries on aristotle's "topics" (1250-1500) ». Electronic Thesis or Diss., Tours, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017TOUR2035.
Texte intégralFor anyone who intends to inquiry into the reception fo the Arisotelian Topics in the Middle Age, the inevitable starting point is the unique monography dealing with this issue, namely The Tradition of the Topics in the Middle Ages. The Commentaries on Aristotie‘s and Boethius ‘Topics’, published by Nigel Jørgen Green-Pedersen in 1984. Since the publication of this volume, scholarly research on medieval logic has shown the need to define better there suits of Green-Pedersens ‘s analysis. My PhD thesis aims at placing the commentators of the Topics in their intellectual context. Through the analysis of manuscript material, I have tried to show the bearing of authors’ diverse philosophical orientations on their approach to and reflections on the Aristotelian work. The earliest Parisian masters who commented on the Topics were concemed with issues that originated from the literaI explanation of the text, e.g. whether the various types of syllogisms had different forms or whether they differentiated only materially. Their prosecutors, namely the modistic authors Boethius of Dacia, Simon of Faversham and Radulphus Brito analysed the Topics in a different way. They paid special attention to metalogical questions, which were beyond the scope of the mere literal explication of the text. In mid-14th century, the Parisian master of art John Buridan proposed an innovative view about the proper subject of dialectic: it was dialectical argumentation, namely a probative or convincing reasoning which brought the agent an epistemic gain, although it could be formally invaiid. Buridan’s opinion about the subject matter of dialectic was adopted by 15th century masters, who taught in University that were nominalist in orientation. In those 15th century Universities in which the via antiqua provided the intellectual setting for masters and scholars, commentators of Aristotle’s Topics were influenced by 13th century commentators, such as Albert the Great. The English reception of the Aristotelian Topics was significantly diverse from the continental or Parisian tradition. The commentaries written by Pseudo-Bonaventure, John Duns Scotus and Walter Burley shared common features, which were strictly connected to terministic logic and which were not present in Parisian commentaries of the same period
Karabela, Mehmet Kadri. « The development of dialectic and argumentation theory in post-classical Islamic intellectual history ». Thesis, McGill University, 2011. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=96696.
Texte intégralCette dissertation est une analyse de l'évolution de la théorie dialectique et d'argumentation dans l'histoire intellectuelle islamique post-classique. Les préoccupations centrales de la thèse sont les suivantes: les traités sur la compréhension théorique de la notion de la théorie dialectique (de logique) et d'argumentation, et comment, en pratique, la notion dialectique, tel qu'elle est exprimée dans la tradition grecque classique, a été reçue et utilisée par les cinq collectivités du camp intellectuel islamique. Cette étude démontre comment la notion dialectique en tant que discours argumentatif a été diffusée dans cinq collectivités (théologiens, poètes, grammairiens, philosophes et juristes) et comment ces notions logiques locales, développées dans les différentes communautés, se sont fusionnées en un seul système pour former une théorie d'argumentation générale (adab al-bahth) applicable à tous les domaines.J'évalue un traité de Shams al-Din Samarqandi (d.702/1302), le fondateur de cette théorie générale, et les traités qui ont été écrits après lui en tant que succession de son travail. Je me concentre spécifiquement sur les travaux de 'Adud al-Din al-Iji (d.756/1355), Sayyid Sharif al-Jurjani (d.816/1413), Taşköprüzâde (d.968/1561), Saçaklızâde (d.1150/1737) et Gelenbevî (d.1205/1791) et analyse comment chaque auteur (de Samarqandi à Gelenbevî) a modifié la forme du discours argumentatif et comment les intellectuels, venus par après dans le monde post-islamique classique, ont répondu à ce discours transmis par leurs prédécesseurs.Ce qui est frappant, de la période que cette thèse étudie (de 1300-1800), est la persistance de ce qu'on pourrait appeler le tournant linguistique dans la théorie de l'argumentation. Après plusieurs siècles, la notion dialectique de la période classique basée sur jadal fût remplacée par une nouvelle théorie d'argumentation qui était principalement de caractère linguistique. Ce tournant linguistique dans l'argumentation est daté du dernier quart du quatorzième siècle dans le travail sur 'ilm al-wad' impressionnant et prémonitoire d'al-Iji. Cette idée, qui est finalement émergée dans la période post-classique, disant que l'argumentation décrit une définition et que, par conséquent, la définition est l'utilité du langage —et même peut-être, que le langage est le seul moyen disponible pour comprendre et être compris— a influencé la façon dont la théorie d'argumentation a été formulée dans la majeure partie de la période en question.Le discours argumentatif qui a commencé avec Ibn al-Rawandi au troisième/neuvième siècle a laissé une empreinte permanente dans l'histoire intellectuelle islamique qui s'est remplie de concepts, de terminologie et d'objectifs de ce discours jusqu'à la fin du dix-neuvième siècle. Selon cette perspective, l'histoire intellectuelle islamique peut être lue comme une divergence entre deux langues: le "langage dialectique" (jadal) et le "langage démonstratif" (burhan), dont chacun se réfère non seulement à une caractéristique importante de cette histoire, mais à une caractéristique qui pourrait changer radicalement l'interprétation de cette histoire.
Livres sur le sujet "Dialectical argumentation"
van Eemeren, Frans H. Argumentation Theory : A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95381-6.
Texte intégralEemeren, F. H. van. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse : Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam : John Benjamins Pub., 2010.
Trouver le texte intégralStrategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse : Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam : John Benjamins Pub., 2010.
Trouver le texte intégralPaul's argumentation in Galatians : A pragma-dialectical analysis. London, UK : T & T Clark, 2007.
Trouver le texte intégralR, Grootendorst, dir. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies : A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, N.J : L. Erlbaum, 1992.
Trouver le texte intégralR, Grootendorst, dir. A systematic theory of argumentation : The pragma-dialectical approach. New York : Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Trouver le texte intégralMedia argumentation : Dialectic, persuasion, and rhetoric. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Trouver le texte intégralvan, Eemeren F. H., et Houtlosser Peter 1956-, dir. Dialectic and rhetoric : The warp and woof of argumentation analysis. Dordrecht [Netherlands] : Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
Trouver le texte intégral1957-, Singh Raghwendra Pratap, dir. Reason, dialectic, and postmodern philosophy : Indian and Western perspectives. Faridabad : Om Publications, 2001.
Trouver le texte intégralBruce, Chilton, dir. The intellectual foundations of Christian and Jewish discourse : The philosophy of religious argument. London : Routledge, 1997.
Trouver le texte intégralChapitres de livres sur le sujet "Dialectical argumentation"
Young, Walter Edward. « Short Dialectical Sequences and Independent Dialectical Formulae ». Dans Logic, Argumentation & ; Reasoning, 379–433. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25522-4_6.
Texte intégralvan Eemeren, Frans H., et R. Grootendorst. « Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective ». Dans Argumentation Library, 557–74. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_29.
Texte intégralFreeman, James B. « The Dialectical Nature of Argument ». Dans Argumentation Library, 39–58. Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0357-5_2.
Texte intégralvan Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij et Jean H. M. Wagemans. « Formal Dialectical Approaches ». Dans Handbook of Argumentation Theory, 301–72. Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5_6.
Texte intégralvan Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij et Jean H. M. Wagemans. « Formal Dialectical Approaches ». Dans Handbook of Argumentation Theory, 1–62. Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6883-3_6-1.
Texte intégralYoung, Walter Edward. « Extended Dialectical Sequences ». Dans Logic, Argumentation & ; Reasoning, 217–377. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25522-4_5.
Texte intégralvan Eemeren, Frans H., et Rob Grootendorst. « Rationale for a Pragma-Dialectical Perspective ». Dans Argumentation Library, 203–21. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_10.
Texte intégralFeteris, Eveline T. « The Pragma-Dialectical Approach of Legal Argumentation ». Dans Argumentation Library, 201–54. Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1129-4_10.
Texte intégralvan Eemeren, Frans H., Peter Houtlosser et A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans. « Dialectical Profiles and Indicators of Argumentative Moves ». Dans Argumentation Library, 681–702. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_36.
Texte intégralvan Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen et Bert Meuffels. « Effectiveness Through Reasonableness : A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective ». Dans Argumentation Library, 773–93. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_42.
Texte intégralActes de conférences sur le sujet "Dialectical argumentation"
Heyninck, Jesse, Gabriele Kern-Isberner, Tjitze Rienstra, Kenneth Skiba et Matthias Thimm. « Revision and Conditional Inference for Abstract Dialectical Frameworks ». Dans 18th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning {KR-2021}. California : International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/kr.2021/33.
Texte intégralArcidiacono, Francesco, et Antonio Bova. « Argumentation among Family Members in Italy and Switzerland : A Cross-Cultural Perspective ». Dans International Association of Cross Cultural Psychology Congress. International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.4087/sjpx2962.
Texte intégralD'Agostino, Marcello, et Sanjay Modgil. « A Study of Argumentative Characterisations of Preferred Subtheories ». Dans Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence {IJCAI-18}. California : International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2018/247.
Texte intégralKeshavarzi Zafarghandi, Atefeh, Rineke Verbrugge et Bart Verheij. « Semi-Stable Semantics for Abstract Dialectical Frameworks ». Dans 18th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning {KR-2021}. California : International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/kr.2021/40.
Texte intégralČyras, Kristijonas, Antonio Rago, Emanuele Albini, Pietro Baroni et Francesca Toni. « Argumentative XAI : A Survey ». Dans Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence {IJCAI-21}. California : International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2021/600.
Texte intégralHeyninck, Jesse, Gabriele Kern-Isberner, Tjitze Rienstra, Kenneth Skiba et Matthias Thimm. « Possibilistic Logic Underlies Abstract Dialectical Frameworks ». Dans Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence {IJCAI-22}. California : International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2022/368.
Texte intégralVerheij, Bart. « Legal decision making as dialectical theory construction with argumentation schemes ». Dans the 8th international conference. New York, New York, USA : ACM Press, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/383535.383565.
Texte intégralCayrol, C., C. Devred et M. C. Lagasquie-Schiex. « Dialectical Proofs Accounting for Strength of Attacks in Argumentation Systems ». Dans 2010 22nd International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ictai.2010.36.
Texte intégralIrwin, Benjamin, Antonio Rago et Francesca Toni. « Forecasting Argumentation Frameworks ». Dans 19th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning {KR-2022}. California : International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/kr.2022/55.
Texte intégralHeyninck, Jesse, et Christian Straßer. « Revisiting Unrestricted Rebut and Preferences in Structured Argumentation. » Dans Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. California : International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/151.
Texte intégral