Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « Defence innovation »
Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres
Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « Defence innovation ».
À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.
Articles de revues sur le sujet "Defence innovation"
Shinkevich, A. I., et D. V. Kharitonov. « Integration of innovation development and implementation processes in defence industry according to a demand — supply format ». Vestnik Universiteta, no 9 (30 octobre 2022) : 47–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2022-9-47-55.
Texte intégralFord, Matthew, Timothy Hodgetts et David Williams. « Innovation Strategies for Defence ». RUSI Journal 162, no 2 (4 mars 2017) : 52–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2017.1301216.
Texte intégralBehera, Laxman Kumar. « Examining India’s defence innovation performance ». Journal of Strategic Studies 44, no 6 (19 septembre 2021) : 830–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2021.1993829.
Texte intégralBasevich, Elvira. « Democracy’s Values and Ideals : A Duboisian Defence ». Monist 107, no 1 (1 janvier 2024) : 13–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/monist/onad028.
Texte intégralBrožič, Liliana, et Klemen Kocjančič. « Editorial : Defence Research, Development and Innovation ». CONTEMPORARY MILITARY CHALLENGES 25, no 2 (1 juin 2023) : 5–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/cmc-2023-0010.
Texte intégralSampson, Ben. « Focus on Innovation ». Aerospace Testing International 2023, no 1 (mars 2023) : 24–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/s1478-2774(23)50327-6.
Texte intégralJurčić, Marina, Sandra Lovrenčić et Nataša Kurnoga. « Croatian Defense Industry Competitiveness Cluster : Knowledge Management and Innovation Perspective ». Business Systems Research Journal 11, no 1 (1 mars 2020) : 59–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2020-0005.
Texte intégralRaymond, Marie-Pierre, et Eric Fournier. « An access to innovation program to enhance the technological capabilities of the armed forces ». Міжнародний науковий журнал «Military Science» 2, no 1 (3 avril 2024) : 83–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.62524/msj.2024.2.1.07.
Texte intégralLöhr, Johannes. « McKinsey auf der Hardthöhe : Unternehmensberater im Bundesministerium der Verteidigung 1981/82 ». Administory 6, no 1 (1 décembre 2021) : 151–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/adhi-2022-0002.
Texte intégralRao, Shuktij Singh, Arindam Banik, Ashutosh Khanna et Deepu Philip. « Disruptive Innovation in Indian Aerospace and Defence Industry ». Studies in Microeconomics 8, no 2 (18 novembre 2019) : 212–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2321022219874185.
Texte intégralThèses sur le sujet "Defence innovation"
James, Andrew D. « The changing nature of the defence industry and the defence innovation system : organisational actors, relationships and system boundaries ». Thesis, University of Manchester, 2011. http://www.manchester.ac.uk/escholar/uk-ac-man-scw:148074.
Texte intégralSilber, Stephane Carleton University Dissertation Management Studies. « Defence conversion : A comparison of the innovation processes of defence and non-defence products in the electronic sector of the Canadian defence industry ». Ottawa, 1996.
Trouver le texte intégralMölleryd, Bengt A. « An anatomy of technological innovation in infrastructure and defence systems in Sweden after the Cold War ». Licentiate thesis, KTH, Kraft- och värmeteknologi, 2011. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-31494.
Texte intégralQC 20110317
Macwhannell, Robert. « An investigation of Organisational Carbon Accounting (OCA) practices in the defence sector to determine how these can best support low carbon technology innovation ». Thesis, University of Central Lancashire, 2018. http://clok.uclan.ac.uk/23077/.
Texte intégralLockhart, David E. « Open Innovation| Accelerating Innovative Products and Services through the Department of Defense Acquisition Management System ». Thesis, University of Maryland University College, 2018. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10837400.
Texte intégralThe purpose of this dissertation was to explore the application of open innovation theory concepts and practices employed in private industry to the federal public sector, specifically the Department of Defense (DoD) Defense Acquisition Management System (DAMS). This study considered using open innovation to improve the DoD’s ability to move innovative products and services through the DAMS faster, at a lower cost, while continuing to meet performance requirements for the DoD’s end-users. The theoretical lens was focused around the core concept of open innovation: collaboration with external parties, principally customers, and the acquisition, integration, and application of knowledge from external parties to improve innovation performance. The study also considered improved performance from the perspective of what the DoD, as the primary customer in the ecosystem, could do to raise the capacity of its supporting industrial base. Furthermore, the study considered the importance, use, and alignment of several secondary enablers that are needed to improve the probability of successfully implementing open innovation, including leadership and governance, culture, intellectual property and legal issues, funding, and technology. The study examined four propositions identified in the literature review and used realist synthesis in combination with the context, intervention, mechanism, and outcomes model to determine their validity. In the synthesis, the study identified four major findings that served to validate each of the propositions, essentially supporting the overall proposition that, as the primary customer in the ecosystem, the DoD’s effective use of collaboration with industry throughout the process and its provision of the right type of information earlier in the process resulted in better innovation performance for everyone in the ecosystem.
Murphy, Michael F. « Medical operations centers duplication or a needed innovation ? / ». Thesis, Monterey, California : Naval Postgraduate School, 2009. http://edocs.nps.edu/npspubs/scholarly/theses/2009/Dec/09Dec%5FMurphy.pdf.
Texte intégralThesis Advisor(s): Bach, Robert. Second Reader: Woodbury, Glen. "December 2009." Description based on title screen as viewed on January 28, 2010. Author(s) subject terms: medical operations center, medical system, public-health system, medical surge, homeland security, integration, coordination, collaboration, emergency management, mass casualty, disaster, communications, resource management, public-health emergency, ESF-8, HSPD-21, EMS, hospitals. Includes bibliographical references (p. 123-128). Also available in print.
Vernhes, Gabriel. « Les relations entre sciences, technologies et territoires au cœur de la souveraineté nationale : une approche structurale sur longue période ». Electronic Thesis or Diss., Institut polytechnique de Paris, 2024. http://www.theses.fr/2024IPPAE002.
Texte intégralThis thesis delves into the territorial dimension of scientific and technological knowledge exchange, a pivotal aspect of the innovation process. It focuses on defence-related technological fields, such as weaponry, aerospace equipment and 3D printing, to scrutinize how scientific advancements are integrated into technological development. Furthermore, our analysis focuses on measuring strategic autonomy of national territories, assessing their capacity to independently produce, use and disseminate knowledge. This form of autonomy in critical defence innovation sectors is a key factor in current discussions on national sovereignty.From an institutionalist viewpoint, this manuscript situates the innovation process within the national innovation system framework. In this context, territory is understood as a social, political and cultural construct that facilitates interactions and the exchange of knowledge.Our empirical method mobilizes quantitative methods using a large number of patent data and scientific publications to establish global knowledge networks, based on citations and semantic proximity. In this regard, we employ a structural approach, integrating influence graph theory consolidated with econometric models.Our findings reveal two distinct global knowledge networks. The first, encompassing explicit knowledge, can be easily disseminated, and assimilated across various territories. The analysis of these networks permits a comparative evaluation of the control over strategic knowledge among different territories, highlighting situations of dominance or dependence on external sources of knowledge. The second network, with more local roots, comprises tacit, applied knowledge that is intrinsic to individuals and their social interaction networks, thereby being geographically bounded. This network accounts for the sustained presence of national expertise over an extended period, notwithstanding the globalized nature of knowledge exchange driven by globalisation and the advancement of information and communication technologies.Our study shows that the coexistence of these networks is essential in knowledge maturation. Despite the more codified and globalized nature of scientific activity compared to technological, it retains strong territorial ties, fostering local innovation through tacit knowledge exchange. These insights suggest that investments in specific domains are crucial for enhancing national sovereignty in strategic innovation
Cremonini, Edoardo. « Performance and monitoring of innovative coastal defense works ». Master's thesis, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, 2017.
Trouver le texte intégralMyers, Todd P. (Todd Preston). « Democratizing innovation in the Department of Defense : a model for improving innovation in an era of fiscal tightening ». Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/105298.
Texte intégralCataloged from PDF version of thesis. "13 December 2013."
Includes bibliographical references (pages 98-103).
Democratized innovation is a paradigm characterized by users moving beyond the traditional construct that portrays them as passive recipients of firm-developed products. This field of research was launched by Professor Eric von Hippel in the 1970s with his landmark study on the scientific instrument industry that identified users as the source for the majority of new products on the market. Following this work, empirical studies have been conducted in countless other fields; however, the existing research regarding user innovation within the military is lacking This work contributes to the existing literature by investigating user innovation principles within the context of the DoD with a multi-axis study that examines toolkit-related innovation, user-initiated projects, institutional attempts to stimulate user innovation, and the introduction of maker spaces. The exploratory research included here allows us to study patterns and compare internal and external factors in a way that avoids extrapolating overly broad conclusions from a single case. Considered together, the projects yield evidence supporting the existence of user innovation within the Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marines. They are also a mix of software development, hardware modification, and "platforming" initiatives. Our findings reveal environmental factors that, at times, stunt the naturally occurring user innovation processes and distort the democratized innovation construct formulated by von Hippel and his colleagues. Following the identification of these barriers to user innovation, we suggest ways in which DoD leadership might rebalance the scales between formal R&D units and user-innovators. These proposals consist of catalyzing agents that would serve to counteract DoD-specific barriers to user innovation and allow the military to access previously untapped human capital. Throughout this work, user innovation is shown to hold significant promise as an additional source of new product concepts for the DoD. The current state of the military acquisitions system, which is beset by aging equipment, a shifting strategic picture, rapid technological change, and declining budgets, demands that this promise be acted upon.
by Todd P. Myers.
S.M. in Engineering and Management
MELO, DANIEL PETERSON CARVALHO DE. « INFRASTRUCTURAL TECHNOLOGIES AND INNOVATION IN THE BASIS OF THE BRAZILIAN INDUSTRIAL DEFENSE ». PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO DE JANEIRO, 2014. http://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/Busca_etds.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=24363@1.
Texte intégralCOORDENAÇÃO DE APERFEIÇOAMENTO DO PESSOAL DE ENSINO SUPERIOR
INSTITUTO MILITAR DE ENGENHARIA
CENTRO TECNOLÓGICO DO EXÉRCITO
PROGRAMA DE SUPORTE À PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO DE INSTS. DE ENSINO
O objetivo da dissertação é contribuir para o avanço do conhecimento sobre a capacidade de inovação e os obstáculos à inovação enfrentados pelas empresas da Base Industrial da Defesa (BID), destacando-se o papel da Tecnologia Industrial Básica (TIB) no fortalecimento dessa capacidade. Particularmente, a dissertação procura responder como as empresas da BID percebem a importância das funções da TIB - metrologia, normalização, regulamentação técnica e avaliação da conformidade – em seus ciclos de inovação, na perspectiva de ressaltar os benefícios oriundos da consolidação da infraestrutura nacional de serviços tecnológicos de suporte à capacidade inovadora dessas empresas. A metodologia compreende: (i) revisão bibliográfica e documental sobre os temas centrais da dissertação; (ii) definição do objeto do estudo; seleção da fonte primária de dados – Pesquisa de Inovação (Pintec) do IBGE – e da grade de análise da pesquisa; (iii) elaboração do plano tabular para solicitação ao IBGE de tabulações especiais da Pintec 2011; (iv) análise e discussão dos resultados; e (v) formulação das conclusões da pesquisa e de sugestões para a próxima Pintec e estudos futuros. Destacam-se como resultados: (i) a identificação de itens da Pintec diretamente associados às funções da TIB; (ii) a análise da percepção das empresas da BID sobre a relevância das funções da TIB para a inovação; e (iii) a análise comparativa dos padrões de respostas das empresas da BID que implementaram inovações e das que não implementaram.
The main aim of this dissertation is to contribute to the understanding of basic infrastructural technologies support to innovation activities by firms of defense industry in Brazil. Particularly, this work seeks to answer how defense firms perceive the importance of infrastructural technologies - metrology, standardization, technical regulation and conformity assessment - in their innovation cycles. The methodology comprises: (i) a literature survey to elaborate a theoretical outline to characterize the core subjects of the research: defense innovation system and defense products; sectorial systems of innovation; and infrastructural technologies; (ii) definition of the research scope; selection of the primary data source - the Brazilian Survey of Technological Innovation (Pintec), published by the Statistical Office (IBGE), and the research analytical framework; (iii) data collection and tabulation; (iv) main findings discussion; and (v) formulation of conclusions and suggestions for the next Pintec survey and for future research. The main results can be summarized as follows: (i) identification of PINTEC items directly associated with basic infrastructural technologies; (ii) identification and analysis of Brazilian defense firms perceptions about the relevance of basic infrastructural technologies in supporting their innovation strategies; and (iii) comparative analysis of patterns of response of innovative and non-innovative defense firms.
Livres sur le sujet "Defence innovation"
Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, dir. Defence innovation in India : The fault lines. New Delhi : Institute for Defence Studies & Analyses, 2014.
Trouver le texte intégralRaska, Michael, et Richard A. Bitzinger. The AI Wave in Defence Innovation. London : Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003218326.
Texte intégralRaska, Michael, Katarzyna Zysk et Ian Bowers. Defence Innovation and the 4th Industrial Revolution. London : Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003268215.
Texte intégral1943-, Elliott David, Armson Rosalind et Open University. Design and Innovation Course Team., dir. Design and innovation. : Kondratieff cycles, defence technology. Milton Keynes : Open University Press, 1986.
Trouver le texte intégralAdlakha-Hutcheon, Gitanjali, et Anthony Masys, dir. Disruption, Ideation and Innovation for Defence and Security. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06636-8.
Texte intégral1953-, Harding Richard, dir. The Royal Navy, 1930-1990 : Innovation and defence. New York, NY : Routledge, 2004.
Trouver le texte intégralMagnussen, Leif. Chapter 18 Didactics and Innovation in Collaboration for the Unforeseen in Training Practice Preparation. Oslo : Cappelen Damm Akademisk/NOASP (Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing), 2018.
Trouver le texte intégralDrake, Irmelin. Chapter 12 Social Innovation and Collaboration : Identifying and Engaging Stakeholders with Power, Purpose, Passion and Presence. Oslo : Cappelen Damm Akademisk/NOASP (Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing), 2018.
Trouver le texte intégralWim, Smit, Grin John et Voronkov L. S, dir. Military technological innovation and stability in a changing world : Politically assessing and influencing weapon innovation and military research and development. Amsterdam : VU University Press, 1992.
Trouver le texte intégralCulkin, Nigel. The search for innovation through divine intervention : A case study of defence diversification. Hertford : University of Hertfordshire, 1997.
Trouver le texte intégralChapitres de livres sur le sujet "Defence innovation"
Behera, Laxman Kumar. « Examining India's defence innovation performance ». Dans Comparing Defense Innovation Around the World, 99–122. London : Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003325055-5.
Texte intégralRaska, Michael. « Reimagining Defense Innovation : Defense AI in Singapore ». Dans Contributions to Security and Defence Studies, 555–80. Cham : Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58649-1_25.
Texte intégralKronz, Hermann. « Response in Defence of the Innovation Patent Concept ». Dans Direct Protection of Innovation, 257–76. Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1265-1_12.
Texte intégralCanca, Cansu. « AI Ethics and Governance in Defence Innovation ». Dans The AI Wave in Defence Innovation, 59–79. London : Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003218326-4.
Texte intégralJames, Andrew. « Defence and Security : New Issues and Impacts ». Dans Science, Technology and Innovation Studies, 287–302. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04370-4_13.
Texte intégralHinata-Yamaguchi, Ryo. « Comparing Military AI Strategic Perspectives ». Dans The AI Wave in Defence Innovation, 199–216. London : Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003218326-10.
Texte intégralSoare, Simona R. « European Military AI ». Dans The AI Wave in Defence Innovation, 80–111. London : Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003218326-5.
Texte intégralRaska, Michael, et Richard A. Bitzinger. « Introduction ». Dans The AI Wave in Defence Innovation, 1–11. London : Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003218326-1.
Texte intégralHaotian, Qi. « China's Evolving AI Development ». Dans The AI Wave in Defence Innovation, 136–55. London : Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003218326-7.
Texte intégralStanley-Lockman, Zoe. « US Governance of Artificial Intelligence for National Security ». Dans The AI Wave in Defence Innovation, 112–35. London : Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003218326-6.
Texte intégralActes de conférences sur le sujet "Defence innovation"
Ranjith, Geethika, Nandana Jayachandran et Aleena Mairya Anil. « Satellite-Borne Space Waste Management System Using 3D Printing and Robotics : Innovation for space technology ». Dans 2024 IEEE Space, Aerospace and Defence Conference (SPACE), 705–8. IEEE, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/space63117.2024.10667807.
Texte intégralGoudarzi, Kiyanoush, Abouzar Gharajeh, Fargol Seifollahi, Hamidreza Ramezani et Qing Gu. « Defect mode lasing in a non-Hermitian 1D trivial SSH lattice ». Dans CLEO : Science and Innovations, SF3E.2. Washington, D.C. : Optica Publishing Group, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/cleo_si.2024.sf3e.2.
Texte intégralTwort, Lauren, et John Louth. « The Challenges of Innovation in UK Defence ». Dans Annual International Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (IE 2017). Global Science & Technology Forum (GSTF), 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5176/2251-2039_ie17.4.
Texte intégralHowe, J. « Technology strategy and innovation in the defence context ». Dans IET 2nd International Technology and Innovation Conference. IEE, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ic:20060225.
Texte intégralCarr, Debra. « Innovation for a Safer Future : The Defence and Security Accelerator ». Dans SPIE Security + Defence Industry Talks, sous la direction de Conference Chair. SPIE, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2582385.
Texte intégralOrson, Jay A., et Tyler N. Hague. « Battlefield innovation : a case-study of remote sensor development ». Dans Optics/Photonics in Security and Defence, sous la direction de Gary W. Kamerman, Ove K. Steinvall, Keith L. Lewis, Keith A. Krapels, John C. Carrano et Arturas Zukauskas. SPIE, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.739030.
Texte intégralChana, Deeph. « NATO DIANA : a case study for reimagining defence innovation ». Dans SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing Plenaries and Industry Events 2024. SPIE, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.3032432.
Texte intégralBray, Mark E., et Robert A. Shears. « Results from the electro-optic sensors domain of the materials and components for missiles innovation and technology partnership (phase 1) ». Dans SPIE Security + Defence, sous la direction de David A. Huckridge et Reinhard Ebert. SPIE, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2028735.
Texte intégralJakobsson, Ase K., Elena Mazourenko, Regina Crameri et Diana Shrimpton. « Innovation and emergent technologies for defence — ; Logic and creativity ». Dans 2014 9th International Conference on System of Systems Engineering (SOSE). IEEE, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/sysose.2014.6892478.
Texte intégralJasi, Dorothea Sthallhani, Romie Oktovianus Bura et Jupriyanto. « Innovation of Defense Technology Audit to Support Self-Reliant National Defense Industry ». Dans 2019 IEEE 6th Asian Conference on Defence Technology (ACDT). IEEE, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/acdt47198.2019.9072944.
Texte intégralRapports d'organisations sur le sujet "Defence innovation"
Meisiek, Stefan. Occasional Paper No 26 - Benchmarking Bottom-up Innovation at the Australian Defence Force : An International Comparative Analysis. Australian Army Research Centre, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.61451/267511.
Texte intégralAhola, Michael J. To Defend the Temple : Innovation in the Israeli Defense Force. Fort Belvoir, VA : Defense Technical Information Center, janvier 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada443516.
Texte intégralWagen, Carey M. Twenty-First Century Defense and Disruptive Innovation. Fort Belvoir, VA : Defense Technical Information Center, mars 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada563406.
Texte intégralFlagg, Melissa, et Jack Corrigan. Ending Innovation Tourism : Rethinking the U.S. Military’s Approach to Emerging Technology Adoption. Center for Security and Emerging Technology, juillet 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.51593/20210030.
Texte intégralLuong, Ngor, Rebecca Gelles et Melissa Flagg. Mapping the AI Investment Activities of Top Global Defense Companies. Center for Security and Emerging Technology, octobre 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.51593/20210015.
Texte intégralGehlhaus, Diana, James Ryseff et Jack Corrigan. The Race for U.S. Technical Talent. Center for Security and Emerging Technology, août 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.51593/20210074.
Texte intégralDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE WASHINGTON DC. Defense Small Business Innovation Research Program (SBIR). Defense Agencies Abstracts of Phase 2 Awards 1993. Fort Belvoir, VA : Defense Technical Information Center, janvier 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada282874.
Texte intégralDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE WASHINGTON DC. Defense Small Business Innovation Research Program (SBIR). Volume 4. Defense Agencies Abstracts of Phase 1 Awards. 1990. Fort Belvoir, VA : Defense Technical Information Center, janvier 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada248990.
Texte intégralDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE WASHINGTON DC. Defense Small Business Innovation Research Program (SBIR), Volume 4, Defense Agencies Abstracts of Phase 1 Awards 1991. Fort Belvoir, VA : Defense Technical Information Center, janvier 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada252510.
Texte intégralCoughlan, Peter J., et William Gates. Innovations in Defense Acquisition : Asymmetric Information and Incentive Contract Design. Fort Belvoir, VA : Defense Technical Information Center, décembre 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada529452.
Texte intégral