Bibliographies thématiques / Deer (Abbey) / Articles de revues

Articles de revues sur le sujet « Deer (Abbey) »

Pour voir les autres types de publications sur ce sujet consultez le lien suivant : Deer (Abbey).
Auteur : Grafiati
Publié le 26 juillet 2024
Mis à jour le 28 juillet 2024

Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres

Choisissez une source :

Consultez les 50 meilleurs articles de revues pour votre recherche sur le sujet « Deer (Abbey) ».

À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.

Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.

Parcourez les articles de revues sur diverses disciplines et organisez correctement votre bibliographie.

1

Geddes, Jane. « The art of the Book of Deer ». Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 128 (30 novembre 1999) : 537–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.9750/psas.128.537.549.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
This paper explores the iconography and style of the illuminations in the 10th-century Book of Deer (Cambridge Univ Lib Ii 6.32). Although in format and general appearance the book conforms to a group of Irish pocket gospels, it is possible that the book was produced in Scotland, with Deer Abbey being the most likely location. On f4v a sword of Anglo-Saxon or Viking type is depicted. The implications of this are examined in terms of surviving artefacts and other manuscript depictions.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Hu, Huijian, et Zhigang Jiang. « Trial release of Père David's deer Elaphurus davidianus in the Dafeng Reserve, China ». Oryx 36, no 2 (avril 2002) : 196–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0030605302000273.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
The Critically Endangered Père David's deer Elaphurus davidianu became extinct in the wild in China in about 1900, and the only surviving animals were held in captivity at Woburn Abbey in the UK. During 1985–1987, individuals were returned to China, and subsequent growth of the captive population in enclosures at Dafeng Reserve necessitated a trial release of a small group of deer as a prelude to further releases. Seven individuals were released into the unfenced coastal region of the Dafeng Reserve in 1998. Behaviour, daily activity rhythm, habitat selection, activity range and body condition were recorded for six months after release. The deer exhibited initial changes in behaviour, but returned to their pre-release patterns about four weeks after release, and by six weeks after release their body condition had improved compared to their previous condition in captivity. They left the Reserve and began to forage on farmland, causing conflict with local people. Further releases should be into areas with either a natural or artificial boundary in order to avoid unmanageable levels of conflict between the needs of the deer and those of farmers.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
3

Dixon, Piers, et John Gilbert. « Dormount Hope ». Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 150 (30 novembre 2021) : 201–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.9750/psas.150.1314.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Until recently, deer hunting in medieval Scotland has been poorly researched archaeologically. In Hunting and Hunting Reserves in Medieval Scotland Gilbert identified medieval parks at Stirling and Kincardine in Perthshire that William the Lion created, but it is only in recent years that excavations by Hall and Malloy have begun to explore their archaeology. The Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland recorded another type of hunting feature, a deer trap at Hermitage Castle, in 1996 and then re-recorded the earthwork at Dormount Hope in 2000, originally reported as two separate monuments. Although the earthworks of parks and traps display similarities in the construction of their earthwork boundaries, the individual sites have variations in their topography that beg questions about their function. This paper establishes that the earthwork is indeed a single monument which has an open end allowing deer to be driven into the natural canyon of Dormount Hope. It goes on to discuss its dating in both archaeological and documentary terms and then its function as either a park, trap or hay (haga OE). This last possibility is raised by its apparent mention in a Melrose Abbey charter of the neighbouring estate of Raeshaw dating to the last quarter of the 12th century, made by the lords of Hownam, a family of Anglian origin. This Anglian connection leads to its interpretation as a hay – a kind of deer hunting enclosure or trap known in many parts of England prior to the Norman Conquest, for which ‘hay’ place names, such as Hawick, in the Scottish Borders provide support.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
4

Lydekker, R. « 4. On an apparently New Deer from North China, in the Menagerie of the Duke of Bedford at Woburn Abbey. » Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 64, no 4 (21 août 2009) : 930–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1896.tb03088.x.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
5

Currie, Dawn. « Dear Abby ». Feminist Theory 2, no 3 (décembre 2001) : 259–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14647000122229523.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
6

Mollerup, Lene. « På munkenes bord ». Kuml 69, no 69 (29 avril 2021). http://dx.doi.org/10.7146/kuml.v69i69.126094.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
On the monks’ tableThe food and culinary heritage of the Cistercians in Medieval Denmark An investigation of the food and culinary heritage of the Cistercians in Medieval Denmark, involving a range of multidisciplinary sources, has revealed new connections and relations. These sources work together and support each other in areas where others are silent. This has made it possible to follow the food culture of a specific population group through almost 400 years. The monks in Cistercian abbeys ate two daily meals during the summer half of the year, while they only ate one meal a day in winter. At these mealtimes, each monk was served two hot dishes and half a kilo of bread. There was also the opportunity for young and hardworking monks and lay brothers to take a light breakfast of water/beer and bread. To tame their carnal desires, the monks refrained from eating the meat of four-legged animals. Their diet was primarily based around cereal and vegetable products with some fish, eggs and dairy products. Our knowledge of the food on the monks’ table comes from written sources and the archaeological record. We can see that their meals could be served on, and eaten from, locally produced pottery. The monks had their own personal tankards and jugs, and their dinner knives resembled those of the time. It is possible that the fine carving knife found at Øm Abbey, with a handle carved into the figure of a bishop, was used at the abbot’s table.Bread and porridge were made from barley, oats and rye, and buckwheat also found its way into the gruel pot. We know virtually nothing about the vegetables on the monks’ table. The archaeological record is silent on this point, but it seems likely there was a good mixture of commonly cultivated vegetables such as cabbage, onions, leeks and pulses, as revealed by foreign sources. The third course of fresh fruit and salad would consist of apples, pears, plums, bullaces, cherry plums, figs, peaches and a wealth of berries such as raspberries, blackberries, strawberries and blueberries. Elderberries were similarly known and used, as well as hazelnuts and walnuts. Fresh salads could contain young leaves of ground elder, black mustard and endive (leaves of chicory).Part of the monks’ protein-rich diet consisted of dairy products such as milk and cheese as well as eggs in the time outside Lent. Milk was a seasonal and easily perishable product that could be converted into butter and cheese to increase its keeping qualities. Cheese was made from cow’s, goat’s and sheep’s milk.At Lent, the monks were not allowed to eat animal fat, but they knew how to make plant-based “butter” and other “dairy products” with for example walnuts and probably also almonds. Perhaps they also used linseed oil. There is a 14th century cookbook from Sorø Abbey containing recipes for sauces, dressings and egg- and milk-based dishes, as well as dishes with poultry, all of which could be served at the monks’ table. The cookbook could give the monks some ideas for a little variation in their diet without the rules being broken.The monks received gifts of meals called pittances, which are mentioned in written sources from the period 1200-1400. These give us an idea about what was considered as extra provisioning in the abbey and what they were permitted to accept because it took the form of a gift. We hear about well-prepared and well-seasoned milk and fish dishes, for example using stock fish, as well as dishes with aspic and rice, spiced with pepper, and wheat bread, too. Meat from four-legged animals is not mentioned.Fish was eaten in great quantities in the monasteries, especially during Lent. Finds of fish scales and bones from Øm Abbey’s kitchen floor tell us that it was especially freshwater fish species that were consumed here.Animal bones from Øm’s kitchen midden (which is undated) bear witness to the consumption, in some form or other, of cattle, pigs, sheep, goats and horses, as well as wild boar, roe deer and red deer. When and by whom these were eaten is unclear.We can see from the written sources that the sick were permitted to eat meat and that they were served offal and other by-products from the butchering of four-legged animals, while the prohibition on meat for others was strictly maintained.Dated sources, in the form of analyses of preserved plant macro-remains and pollen and deeds of gift with detailed contents, cannot tell us when meat dishes made their entry into the Danish Cistercian abbeys. Other written sources are, however, very consistent in this respect: From 1439 onwards, Cistercians were permitted to eat meat from four-legged animals during specific periods of the year, and from 1475 they were all allowed to eat meat several times a week. These sources suggest that meat dishes apparently did not find favour on the tables of the Cistercians until late in the Middle Ages, but the archaeological record can unfortunately neither confirm nor refute this. Isotope analyses of human bones from Øm Abbey suggest, on the other hand, that the monks consumed increasing amounts of animal protein during the Middle Ages.Sources relating to the Cistercians’ food and culinary heritage indicate that the Danish Cistercians were long-term members of an international order with the same codes of practice, but in the Late Middle Ages they adapted themselves to a changing society. But what was the monks’ attitude to moderation in relation to food? Is there evidence of well-fed bons vivants? The sources suggest that the Cistercians persistently and consistently stood their ground against gluttony, luxury and meat consumption – longer than the other monastic orders. This was probably easier when the food was produced, cooked, served and eaten communally. Food and the settings for the consumption of meals became increasingly profane with time, and it appears that some enjoyment and pleasure eventually found its way to tables of the fat-averse monks, especially in the form of donated food gifts. But well-fed and hedonistic they are probably unlikely ever to have been.The Cistercians, who began as a reform order and created a unique European monastic culture, were forced to see themselves defeated by the times. The order did, however, reform itself again in the 17th century and returned to “the eternal abandonment of meat”, but then it was too late for the Danish Cistercian abbeys. They had all been abolished at the Reformation in 1536.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
7

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 29, no 1 (janvier 2021) : 76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929520001698.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
8

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 29, no 3 (mai 2021) : 88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929521000572.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
9

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 29, no 2 (mars 2021) : 76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929521000080.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
10

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 30, no 4 (juillet 2022) : 68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s155192952200075x.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
11

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 30, no 5 (septembre 2022) : 65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929522000980.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
12

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 30, no 3 (mai 2022) : 69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929522000542.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
13

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 29, no 4 (juillet 2021) : 72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929521000808.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
14

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 29, no 5 (septembre 2021) : 77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929521001012.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
15

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 29, no 6 (novembre 2021) : 73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s155192952100122x.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
16

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 30, no 1 (janvier 2022) : 65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929521001462.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
17

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 30, no 2 (mars 2022) : 65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929522000293.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
18

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 21, no 6 (novembre 2013) : 68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929513001028.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
I am having trouble with my light microscopes. I keep seeing double even when I correctly adjust the interpupillary distance and dioptric parameters. Is it me, or could something serious be wrong with the scope?
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
19

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 22, no 1 (janvier 2014) : 64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929513001338.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
20

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 22, no 2 (mars 2014) : 64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929514000133.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
21

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 22, no 3 (mai 2014) : 72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929514000467.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
22

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 22, no 4 (juillet 2014) : 81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929514000674.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
23

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 22, no 5 (29 août 2014) : 81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s155192951400090x.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
24

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 23, no 4 (juillet 2015) : 81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929515000504.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
25

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 23, no 5 (septembre 2015) : 65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929515000711.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
26

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 23, no 6 (novembre 2015) : 65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929515000905.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
27

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 24, no 1 (janvier 2016) : 65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929515001091.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
28

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 24, no 2 (mars 2016) : 73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929515001297.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
29

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 24, no 3 (28 avril 2016) : 73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929516000262.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
30

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 24, no 4 (17 juin 2016) : 73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929516000493.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
31

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 24, no 5 (septembre 2016) : 64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929516000675.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
32

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 24, no 6 (26 octobre 2016) : 73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929516000833.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
33

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 25, no 1 (janvier 2017) : 65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929516001048.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
34

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 25, no 2 (mars 2017) : 73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s155192951600122x.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
35

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 25, no 3 (mai 2017) : 65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929517000335.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
36

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 25, no 4 (juillet 2017) : 73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929517000542.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
37

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 25, no 5 (31 août 2017) : 73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929517000748.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
38

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 25, no 6 (27 octobre 2017) : 73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929517000943.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
39

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 26, no 1 (janvier 2018) : 57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929517001146.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
40

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 26, no 2 (mars 2018) : 73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929517001341.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
41

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 26, no 3 (mai 2018) : 65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s155192951800041x.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
42

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 26, no 4 (juillet 2018) : 72–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929518000603.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
43

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 26, no 5 (septembre 2018) : 57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929518000780.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
44

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 26, no 6 (novembre 2018) : 57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929518000962.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
45

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 27, no 1 (janvier 2019) : 49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929518001207.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
46

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 27, no 2 (mars 2019) : 53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929518001402.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
47

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 27, no 03 (mai 2019) : 53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929519000385.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
48

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 27, no 4 (juillet 2019) : 64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929519000579.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
49

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 27, no 05 (septembre 2019) : 61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929519000762.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
50

« Dear Abbe ». Microscopy Today 27, no 6 (29 octobre 2019) : 68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929519000956.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Vous pouvez également être intéressé par les bibliographies sur le sujet « Deer (Abbey) » pour d’autres types de sources :
Livres
Nous offrons des réductions sur tous les plans premium pour les auteurs dont les œuvres sont incluses dans des sélections littéraires thématiques. Contactez-nous pour obtenir un code promo unique!

Vers la bibliographie