Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « Decentralization in government – European Union countries »
Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres
Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « Decentralization in government – European Union countries ».
À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.
Articles de revues sur le sujet "Decentralization in government – European Union countries"
Slavinskaite, Neringa. « Fiscal decentralization in Central and Eastern Europe ». Global Journal of Business, Economics and Management : Current Issues 7, no 1 (12 avril 2017) : 69–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.18844/gjbem.v7i1.1236.
Texte intégralHalásková, Martina, et Renata Halásková. « Evaluation Structure of Local Public Expenditures in the European Union Countries ». Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 66, no 3 (2018) : 755–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun201866030755.
Texte intégralSofianou, Eleni, Dimitrios Goulas, Georgia Kontogeorga et Kassiani Droulia. « Evaluation of the first outcomes of decentralization reform with “kallikratis plan” in greece : The case of Ilida’s municipality ». Journal of Governance and Regulation 3, no 2 (2014) : 7–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/jgr_v3_i2_p1.
Texte intégralBabarykina, Nadiia, Oleksandra Demianenko et Yevhen Mahda. « Decentralization as a global trend of democracy development ». Cuestiones Políticas 40, no 73 (29 juillet 2022) : 454–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4073.24.
Texte intégralGoulas, Dimitrios, et Georgia Kontogeorga. « How the economic crisis in Greece affected the steps in applying e-government at the first degree self government of Greece ». Journal of Governance and Regulation 2, no 4 (2013) : 7–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/jgr_v2_i4_p1.
Texte intégralBenčina, Jože, et Anja Mrđa Kovačič. « The Factor Model of Decentralization and Quality of Governance in European Union ». Central European Public Administration Review 11, no 3-4 (9 mai 2014) : 57–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.17573/ipar.2013.3-4.a03.
Texte intégralTolkmitt, Volker, Iryna Volokhova et Ruslana Ignatenko. « FINANCIAL DECENTRALIZATION IN UKRAINE IN THE CONTEXT OF EUROPEAN TRENDS ». Financial and credit activity problems of theory and practice 4, no 45 (5 septembre 2022) : 36–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.4.45.2022.3839.
Texte intégralJochimsen, Beate. « Federalism in Germany, Italy, and the European Union : History, Characteristics, and Perspectives ». Journal for Markets and Ethics 6, no 1 (1 juin 2018) : 145–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jome-2018-0034.
Texte intégralKovalevych, L. « Policy of the states of the European Union against sessesionism ». Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Geography, no 64 (2016) : 74–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/1728-2721.2016.64.13.
Texte intégralKholyavitska, K. S. « Foreign experience of decentralization of power and prospects for Ukraine ». Collected Works of Uman National University of Horticulture 2, no 99 (22 décembre 2021) : 94–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.31395/2415-8240-2021-99-2-94-103.
Texte intégralThèses sur le sujet "Decentralization in government – European Union countries"
Shaw, Kelly B. « The Scottish lobby in contemporary Britain : devolution and European integration / ». free to MU campus, to others for purchase, 2002. http://wwwlib.umi.com/cr/mo/fullcit?p3060143.
Texte intégralKARAGIANNIS, Yannis. « Preference heterogeneity and equilibrium institutions : The case of European competition policy ». Doctoral thesis, European University Institute, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/15460.
Texte intégralExamining board: Prof. Adrienne Héritier (EUI)(Supervisor) ; Prof. Christian Joerges (EUI, Law Department) ; Prof. Jacint Jordana (Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona) ; Prof. Hussein Kassim (Birkbeck College, University of London)
PDF of thesis uploaded from the Library digital archive of EUI PhD theses
One characteristic of European competition policy is its complex governance structure. On the one hand, the European competition regulator has always enjoyed a high degree of formal autonomy from national governments. On the other hand, that regulator has always been embedded in a multi-task and collegial organisation that mirrors intergovernmental politics. Although the literature has often disapprovingly noted this complexity, it has not been explained. Part I elaborates on the theoretical lens for understanding the governance structures of EC competition policy. Despite the prominence of principal-agent models, transaction cost economics seems to offer a more promising venue. The assumption that Member States maximise their total expected gains and postpone excessive bargaining costs leads to the following hypothesis: the greater the preference heterogeneity (homogeneity) between Member States, the higher (lower) the asset-specific investments involved, hence the higher (lower) the risk of post-contractual hold-ups, and hence the more (less) integrated the governance structures created to sustain future transactions. Alternatively, this logic leads to a deterministic hypothesis about the sufficiency of preference heterogeneities for the production of complex governance structures. Part II examines this deterministic hypothesis. Using various sources, and conducting both within- and comparative case- studies, it analyses three important cases: the negotiations of the Treaty of Paris (1951), of the Treaty of Rome (1957), and of the two implementing Council Regulations (1962 and 2003). The evidence shows that (a) the relevant actors do reason in terms of transaction cost-economising, and (b) in the presence of preference heterogeneity, actors create complex governance structures. Nevertheless, it is also found that (c) the transaction cost-economising logic is not as compelling as it may be in private market settings, as bargaining costs are not systematically postponed to the post-contractual stage, and (d) the transaction costs between Member States are not the only relevant costs.
Prosser, Christopher. « Rethinking representation and European integration ». Thesis, University of Oxford, 2015. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:1f596c7e-bfb9-43ff-b3e8-2de716f234ec.
Texte intégralLi, Xin. « European identity, a case study ». Thesis, University of Macau, 2009. http://umaclib3.umac.mo/record=b2555548.
Texte intégralHarvey, Matthew. « Constituting a Commonwealth for Europe and beyond ». Monash University, Faculty of Law, 2003. http://arrow.monash.edu.au/hdl/1959.1/5642.
Texte intégralCarey, Sean D. (Sean Damien). « A Political and Macroeconomic Explanation of Public Support for European Integration ». Thesis, University of North Texas, 1997. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc278919/.
Texte intégralFERNANDES, Daniel. « Governments, public opinion, and social policy : change in Western Europe ». Doctoral thesis, European University Institute, 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/75046.
Texte intégralExamining Board: Prof. Ellen Immergut (EUI, Supervisor); Prof. Anton Hemerijck (EUI); Prof. Christoffer Green-Pedersen (Aarhus University); Prof. Evelyne Hübscher (Central European University)
This dissertation investigates how public opinion and government partisanship affect social policy. It brings an innovative perspective that links the idea of democratic representation to debates about the welfare state. The general claim made here is that social policy is a function of public and government preferences. This claim hinges on two critical premises. The first relates to the general mechanisms that underlie government representation. Politicians have electoral incentives to align their actions with what citizens want. They may respond to public opinion indirectly by updating their party agendas, which can serve as the basis for social policy decisions in case they get elected. They may also respond directly by introducing welfare reforms that react to shifts in public opinion during their mandates. The second premise concerns how citizens and politicians structure their preferences over welfare. These preferences fall alongside two dimensions. First, general attitudes about how much should the state intervene in the economy to reduce inequality and promote economic well-being (how much policy). Second, the specific preferences about which social programmes should get better funding (what kind of policy). The empirical analysis is split into three empirical chapters. Each explores different aspects of government representation in Western European welfare states. The first empirical chapter (Chapter 4) asks how governments shape social policy when facing severe pressures to decrease spending. It argues that governments strategically reduce spending on programmes that offer less visible and indirect benefits, as they are less likely to trigger an electoral backlash. The experience of the Great Recession is consistent with this claim. Countries that faced the most challenging financial constraints cut down social investment and services. Except for Greece, they all preserved consumption schemes. The second empirical chapter (Chapter 5) explores how public opinion affects government spending priorities in different welfare programmes. It expects government responsiveness to depend on public mood for more or less government activity and the most salient social issues at the time. Empirical evidence from old-age, healthcare and education issue-policy areas supports these claims. Higher policy mood and issue saliency is positively associated with increasing spending efforts. Public opinion does not appear to affect unemployment policies. vii The third empirical chapter (Chapter 6) examines how party preferences affect spending priorities in unemployment programmes. It claims that preferences on economic intervention in the economy and welfare recalibration affect different components of unemployment policy. Evidence from the past 20 years bodes well with these expectations. The generosity of compensatory schemes depends on economic preferences. The left invests more than the right. The funding of active labour-market policies depends on both preference dimensions. Among conventional parties, their funding follows the same patterns as compensatory schemes. Among recalibration parties, parties across the economic spectrum present comparable spending patterns.
Lai, I. Tak. « Towards the EU common migration and asylum policy : challenges or opportunities ? » Thesis, University of Macau, 2010. http://umaclib3.umac.mo/record=b2555551.
Texte intégralZhang, Lu. « Is the EU a social union ? :the function of common social policy for European integration ». Thesis, University of Macau, 2012. http://umaclib3.umac.mo/record=b2554777.
Texte intégralIBANEZ, GARZARAN Zyab Luis. « Access to non-vulnerable part-time employment in the Netherlands, Spain and the UK, with special reference to the school and local government sectors ». Doctoral thesis, European University Institute, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/12002.
Texte intégralExamining board: Professor Colin Crouch, University of Warwick (EUI Supervisor); Professor Ramón Ramos Torre, Universidad Complutense; Professor Martin Rhodes, University of Denver; Professor Jelle Visser, Universiteit van Amsterdam
PDF of thesis uploaded from the Library digital archive of EUI PhD theses
A large part of the literature on part-time employment stresses that this form of employment contract is the result of employers’ strategies and female employees who need to reconcile work and family life. However, the growth in the number of employees sharing employment and other paid or unpaid interests expands the range and significance of working-time issues. This dissertation claims that where regulation and implementation of working-time transitions are favourable to part-time employment, part-time is likely to expand to more diverse categories of workers than those for whom it was originally intended ( i.e. mothers with caring responsibilities). The research follows a case-oriented comparative approach that draws on documentary information and a total of 48 in-depth interviews with actors’ representatives at three levels: national, sector (education and local government) and organizational, in the UK, the Netherlands and Spain. Initiated in different moments in time, the regulation of working-time transitions appears to follow a similar staged path in the three countries, although the wider institutional context affecting part-time and the active support of main actors varies for each country, especially at the organizational level. In the Dutch case, part-time regulation started off as a mechanism to enable the employment of women with caring responsibilities and, from there, it evolved towards a wider understanding of workingtime flexibility, extending the right to work part-time to other categories of employees. Given the pioneering role of the Netherlands in this area, it could be argued that both the UK and Spain have been following the Dutch example although with different degrees of success. In the Netherlands, after two decades of active support to part-time, there is still a big gender gap among part-timers, and in many sectors and occupations employees face difficulties to change their working hours; still, the general trend seems to be that access to part-time is becoming easier at more sector and occupational levels, in a context where organizations, already facing short full-time working weeks and high percentages of part-time, have been learning to decouple business hours from the different duration of the employees’ shifts. The need to design clear-cut coordination mechanisms that guarantee the steadiness of the service and the 'standardisation' of handing-over procedures, have helped to accept a variety of working-time arrangements. This capacity to dissociate organisations’ operative time from employees’ working hours is also present in British and Spanish 24-hour services, what has favoured exceptional good part-time jobs. However, the political efforts to promote part-time in Spain and the UK are confronted with serious obstacles, their segmented labour forces among them. The long-hours culture in both Spain and the UK, together with the high proportion of temporary contracts in the Spanish case, are the most visible signs of the structural difficulties these two countries face to achieve working-time flexi-curity. In the three countries, there are no clear links between long hours and productivity levels, and the processess that lead to more transparent assessments of work performance seem to facilitate working-time flexibility beyond standard full-time employment contracts. Certainly, different commitments and compromises need to be achieved between conflicting demands and interests about how employees use their own time, but this thesis argues that part-time may help to soften the conflicts between the specialization and hierarchy requirements of the social division of labour and individuals’ time-use autonomy.
Livres sur le sujet "Decentralization in government – European Union countries"
L' europréfet : Essai sur une Europe de proximité. Paris : Vrin, 2000.
Trouver le texte intégralKrause, Ulf von. Mehrebenengovernance in der EU : Deutsche Mitwirkung an der Rechtsetzung. Wiesbaden : VS, Verlag fur̈ Sozialwissenschaften, 2008.
Trouver le texte intégralThe theory of multi-level governance : Conceptual, empirical, and normative challenges. New York, NY : Oxford University Press, 2010.
Trouver le texte intégralLoughlin, John P. Territorial governance for the 21st century : Contactforum, 16-17 September 2005. Sous la direction de Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van België voor Wetenschappen en Kunsten et Contactforum "Territorial governance for the 21st century" (16-17 September, 2005 : [Brussels]). Brussels : Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van België, 2007.
Trouver le texte intégralDevolution in context : Regional, federal & devolved government in the member states of the European Union. London : Cavendish Pub., 2002.
Trouver le texte intégral1944-, Alemann Ulrich von, et Munch Claudia, dir. Europafähigkeit der Kommunen : Die lokale Ebene in der Europäischen Union. Wiesbaden : VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2006.
Trouver le texte intégralRestructuring Europe : Centre formation, system building and political structuring between the nationstate and the European Union. New York : Oxford University Press Inc., 2005.
Trouver le texte intégralBartolini, Stefano. Restructuring Europe : Centre formation, system building and political structuring between the nation-state and the European Union. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2005.
Trouver le texte intégralChallenging the state : Devolution and the battle for partisan credibility : a comparison of Belgium, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom. New York : Oxford University Press, 2012.
Trouver le texte intégralPolicy, performance and management in governance and intergovernmental relations : Transatlantic perspectives. Cheltenham, U.K : Edward Elgar, 2011.
Trouver le texte intégralChapitres de livres sur le sujet "Decentralization in government – European Union countries"
Orelli, Rebecca L., Emanuele Padovani et Eric Scorsone. « E-government, Accountability, and Performance : Best-in-Class Governments in European Union Countries ». Dans Integrated Series in Information Systems, 561–86. New York, NY : Springer New York, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6536-3_29.
Texte intégralMihr, Anja. « European democracy’s Response to the BRI ». Dans Securitization and Democracy in Eurasia, 375–92. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16659-4_26.
Texte intégralMahmutaj, Noela. « Russian Government Policy in the Western Balkans ». Dans Securitization and Democracy in Eurasia, 125–35. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16659-4_8.
Texte intégralvan Dijk, Frans. « Independence and Trust ». Dans Perceptions of the Independence of Judges in Europe, 77–92. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63143-7_6.
Texte intégralBakir, Vian, et Andrew McStay. « Defending the Civic Body from False Information Online ». Dans Optimising Emotions, Incubating Falsehoods, 205–46. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13551-4_8.
Texte intégralMichailidou, Asimina, Elisabeth Eike et Hans-Jörg Trenz. « Journalism, Truth and the Restoration of Trust in Democracy : Tracing the EU ‘Fake News’ Strategy ». Dans Europe in the Age of Post-Truth Politics, 53–75. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13694-8_4.
Texte intégral« Local government and decentralization ». Dans Albania and the European Union. I.B.Tauris, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9780755619511.ch-009.
Texte intégralVaillancourt, Francois, et Richard M. Bird. « Decentralization in European and MENA Countries ». Dans Advances in Electronic Government, Digital Divide, and Regional Development, 1–27. IGI Global, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9601-3.ch001.
Texte intégralKeating, Michael. « 11. Levels of Government ». Dans Comparative European Politics, 227–46. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198811404.003.0011.
Texte intégralBache, Ian, Simon Bulmer, Stephen George et Owen Parker. « 11. The EU in Crisis (2009–) ». Dans Politics in the European Union, 182–96. Oxford University Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780199689668.003.0011.
Texte intégralActes de conférences sur le sujet "Decentralization in government – European Union countries"
FERUNI, Nerajda. « MACROECONOMIC INDICATORS OF HAPPINESS : CASE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION COUNTRIES ». Dans Happiness And Contemporary Society : Conference Proceedings Volume. SPOLOM, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.31108/7.2021.23.
Texte intégralBaigonushova, Damira, Junus Ganiev et Mairam Baigonusheva. « Government Support of the Agricultural Sector in the EAEU Countries ». Dans International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c11.02291.
Texte intégralGolem, Silvia, et Ivana Žegarac. « Can Fiscal Decentralization Reduce the Public Sector Size in Europe : An Empirical Study ». Dans 6th International Scientific Conference – EMAN 2022 – Economics and Management : How to Cope With Disrupted Times. Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.31410/eman.2022.5.
Texte intégralTashevska, Biljana, Marija Trpkova – Nestorovska et Suzana Makreshanska – Mladenovska. « IS THERE A DOMINANCE OF SOCIAL PROTECTION EXPENDITURE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION ? » Dans Economic and Business Trends Shaping the Future. Ss Cyril and Methodius University, Faculty of Economics-Skopje, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.47063/ebtsf.2020.0003.
Texte intégralVitez Pandžić, Marijeta, et Jasmin Kovačević. « REGULATORY SYSTEMS OF SELECTED EUROPEAN UNION MEMBER STATES IN COVID-19 PANDEMIC MANAGEMENT AND LESSONS FOR THE FUTURE ». Dans EU 2021 – The future of the EU in and after the pandemic. Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.25234/eclic/18360.
Texte intégralTunçsiper, Bedriye, et Ömer Faruk Biçen. « The Effects of European Debt Crisis on Turkey’s Exports ». Dans International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c04.00827.
Texte intégralAhmadov, Vusal. « Successes and failures in Hungarian family businesses ». Dans The European Union’s Contention in the Reshaping Global Economy. Szeged : Szegedi Tudományegyetem Gazdaságtudományi Kar, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.14232/eucrge.2020.proc.11.
Texte intégralStepina, Mairita, et Modrite Pelse. « European Union funding support to Latvian municipalities for degraded areas revitalization ». Dans Research for Rural Development 2022 : annual 28th international scientific conference proceedings. Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.22616/rrd.28.2022.033.
Texte intégralNiftiyev, Ibrahim. « A comparison of institutional quality in the South Caucasus ». Dans The European Union’s Contention in the Reshaping Global Economy. Szeged : Szegedi Tudományegyetem Gazdaságtudományi Kar, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.14232/eucrge.2022.9.
Texte intégralDiril, Funda. « Comparison of Fiscal Reforms in Some South and East European Transition Economies ». Dans International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c05.01014.
Texte intégralRapports d'organisations sur le sujet "Decentralization in government – European Union countries"
Jones, Emily, Beatriz Kira, Anna Sands et Danilo B. Garrido Alves. The UK and Digital Trade : Which way forward ? Blavatnik School of Government, février 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.35489/bsg-wp-2021/038.
Texte intégral