Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « Copropriété (logement) – France – Koweït »
Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres
Sommaire
Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « Copropriété (logement) – France – Koweït ».
À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.
Articles de revues sur le sujet "Copropriété (logement) – France – Koweït"
Willemot, Charlotte. « A Comparative Analysis of Recent Modifications to Several Legal Regimes for Apartment Co-ownership ». European Review of Private Law 28, Issue 2 (1 mai 2020) : 425–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/erpl2020020.
Texte intégralThèses sur le sujet "Copropriété (logement) – France – Koweït"
Alotaibi, Najoud. « La copropriété immobilière, des modèles en transition : étude comparative du droit français et du droit koweïtien ». Electronic Thesis or Diss., Université de Montpellier (2022-....), 2023. http://www.theses.fr/2023UMOND029.
Texte intégralThe world is currently experiencing an undeniable movement of urban, environmental, and digital transition. The real estate sector is not immune to this movement, which raises important questions about the various issues in this area, particularly social, economic, and environmental. The current models of French and Kuwaiti real estate co-ownership, due to their unitary nature, do not allow us to answer such questions. Their inadequacies, both structural and organizational, call into question their very relevance. A legal transition is necessary more than ever to compensate for such inadequacies, exacerbated by the more global transitions affecting the real estate sector. This thesis proposes a redefinition of real estate co-ownership models to better respond to the diversity and complexity of the situations they face. A pluralist approach based on a harmonized but differentiated method of redefinition is defended; from a subjective point of view concerning the management bodies, but also from an objective point of view concerning the management documents
NEREL, FRANCOISE. « Le contrat de location dans l'immeuble en copropriété ». Toulouse 1, 1989. http://www.theses.fr/1989TOU10040.
Texte intégralThe relationship between lease and co-ownership although legally extraneous before the enactment of the quilliot act and later the mehaignerie act have become markedly more interwoven since the act of the 22nd june 1982. Then the act of the 23rd december 1986 abolished the quilliot act and reverted to the previous system maintaining nonetheless the opposable effect of the co-ownership agrement to the leaseholder
Depuy, Laurent. « La superposition des divisions juridiques de l'immeuble ». Toulouse 1, 2000. http://www.theses.fr/2000TOU10027.
Texte intégralHERMANN-DEMIERE, CORINNE. « Les restrictions de liberte du coproprietaire ». Cergy-Pontoise, 1997. http://www.theses.fr/1997CERG0027.
Texte intégralVacher, Annie-Claude. « Les travaux, par un copropriétaire, sur son lot d'habitation ». Aix-Marseille 3, 1993. http://www.theses.fr/1993AIX32000.
Texte intégralConfronted by the technicality of legal rules governing co-ownership of residential property, a co-owner, wishing to undertake building works to his own dwelling, finds himself obliged to respect on arsenal of legislation which resembles more a legal jungle that a coherent body of law. The legal techniques employed have provoked the virtual sterilisation of the dwelling in sub-division. However, recent progress in legal juristrudance offers, hopefully, greater liberty for the individual initiative of co-owners
Tawaschi, Al-Baiate Hatem. « Le statut du copropriétaire au sein d'une copropriété immobilière : étude comparative de droit français, de droit syrien et de droit musulman ». Bordeaux 4, 1995. http://www.theses.fr/1995BOR40027.
Texte intégralBayard-Jammes, Florence. « La nature juridique du droit du copropriétaire immobilier : analyse critique ». Toulouse 1, 2002. http://www.theses.fr/2002TOU10057.
Texte intégralThe co-ownership is governed by the July 10, 1965 Act of Parliament. It is not only a kind of sharing out of the property of a block of flats or a group of blocks of flats among several persons, but also a managing structure based on the same interest. The co-owner is an owner of a pack of co-ownership. That is an abstract entity but nevertheless it is, in itself, a block of flats independent of the other group of blocks of flats. The pack of co-ownership is the subject matter of the right of ownership of the co-owner. Thus, every pack remains an independent ownership in the patrimony of the owner. But the structure of the co-ownership necessarily implies a collective organisation to manage it. However, that situation is not to challenge the right of ownership of the owner on his pack. This can explained if we know that the only aim of the collective organisation is to see to the upkeep of the block of flats
Abbour, Abdelali. « Le statut de la copropriété immobilière en droit marocain : regards historique, critique et comparé ». Toulon, 2009. http://www.theses.fr/2009TOUL0059.
Texte intégralIn recent years, there has been a spectacular increase in the construction of collective accomodations (blocks of flats) in Maroccan cities. The division of flats in low-rise buildings are subjected to specific laws ? those pertaining to co-ownership. The study of this institution is rather delicate, notably due to the diversity of sources and the sociological context in which the question of co-ownership evolves. A preliminary anlysis of the sources and evolution of co-ownership. The approach is rather classical. It opposes the structural co-ownership statutes (first part) with the functional statutes (second part). This analysis shows the existence of a new type of property as regards Moroccan real estate law : a co-ownership lot and the implications implied in terms of theorical choices regarding the notion of co-ownership and the practical consequances of this approach from a strucural and functional standpoint. This research is based on a combined analysis of Dahir from the 16th of November 1946 to the 3rd of October 2002 and the july 10th French law which served as a model. This solid and constructive analysis obviously has practical applications. However, in referring almost exclusively to French case law the main weakness resides in the apparent shortcomings of Moroccan jurisprudence. Therefore, the interpretation of current Moroccan law is critical
Hraki, Ahmad. « Le régime juridique du droit de propriété en matière immobilière : étude critique ». Toulouse 1, 1996. http://www.theses.fr/1996TOU10052.
Texte intégralMaurel, Fabrice. « Copropriété immobilière et droit pénal spécial : du particularisme des infractions pénales à l'utilité du garde particulier ». Nice, 2005. http://www.theses.fr/2005NICE0014.
Texte intégralAs the law of July 10, 1965 at present stand, real joint ownership is a particular situation of the distribution of ownership with a lot of actors. This collective organization is the inevitable theatre of illegal behaviours which, must as a last resort be sanctioned by the repressive law. But the legislator seems until now to have never consider as necessary to lay down a particular criminal law suitable to the real joint ownership. It then appears opportune to study the particularism of the penal infringements applied to the field of real joint ownership because the identification of the infringements takes part in their prevention. However, in this matter, private property keeper from which the statute fell in disuse deserves to be rehabilitated. In charge of protection of the real property and the establishment of infringements, its role is perfectly adapted to the specific needs of real joint ownership