Articles de revues sur le sujet « Contingent capture of attention »

Pour voir les autres types de publications sur ce sujet consultez le lien suivant : Contingent capture of attention.

Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres

Choisissez une source :

Consultez les 50 meilleurs articles de revues pour votre recherche sur le sujet « Contingent capture of attention ».

À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.

Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.

Parcourez les articles de revues sur diverses disciplines et organisez correctement votre bibliographie.

1

Remington, Roger W., Charles L. Folk et John P. Mclean. « Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention ? » Perception & ; Psychophysics 63, no 2 (février 2001) : 298–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/bf03194470.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Leblanc, Émilie, David J. Prime et Pierre Jolicoeur. « Tracking the Location of Visuospatial Attention in a Contingent Capture Paradigm ». Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20, no 4 (avril 2008) : 657–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20051.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Currently, there is considerable controversy regarding the degree to which top-down control can affect attentional capture by salient events. According to the contingent capture hypothesis, attentional capture by a salient stimulus is contingent on a match between the properties of the stimulus and top-down attentional control settings. In contrast, bottom-up saliency accounts argue that the initial capture of attention is determined solely by the relative salience of the stimulus, and the effect of top-down attentional control is limited to effects on the duration of attentional engagement on the capturing stimulus. In the present study, we tested these competing accounts by utilizing the N2pc event-related potential component to track the locus of attention during an attentional capture task. The results were completely consistent with the contingent capture hypothesis: An N2pc wave was elicited only by distractors that possessed the target-defining attribute. In a second experiment, we expanded upon this finding by exploring the effect of target-distractor similarity on the duration that attention dwells at the distractor location. In this experiment, only distractors possessing the target-defining attribute (color) captured visuospatial attention to their location and the N2pc increased in duration and in magnitude when the capture distractor also shared a second target attribute (category membership). Finally, in three additional control experiments, we replicated the finding of an N2pc generated by distractors, only if they shared the target-defining attribute. Thus, our results demonstrate that attentional control settings influence both which stimuli attract attention and to what extent they are processed.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
3

Chua, F. « Non-contingent attention capture by an onset ». Journal of Vision 10, no 7 (2 août 2010) : 112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/10.7.112.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
4

Zivony, Alon, et Dominique Lamy. « Contingent Attentional Engagement : Stimulus- and Goal-Driven Capture Have Qualitatively Different Consequences ». Psychological Science 29, no 12 (4 octobre 2018) : 1930–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797618799302.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
We examined whether shifting attention to a location necessarily entails extracting the features at that location, a process referred to as attentional engagement. In three spatial-cuing experiments ( N = 60), we found that an onset cue captured attention both when it shared the target’s color and when it did not. Yet the effects of the match between the response associated with the cued object’s identity and the response associated with the target (compatibility effects), which are diagnostic of attentional engagement, were observed only with relevant-color onset cues. These findings demonstrate that stimulus- and goal-driven capture have qualitatively different consequences: Before attention is reoriented to the target, it is engaged to the location of the critical distractor following goal-driven capture but not stimulus-driven capture. The reported dissociation between attentional shifts and attentional engagement suggests that attention is best described as a camera: One can align its zoom lens without pressing the shutter button.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
5

Huang, Wanyi, Yuling Su, Yanfen Zhen et Zhe Qu. « The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture ». Psychophysiology 53, no 5 (16 février 2016) : 650–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12615.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
6

Reeck, Crystal, Kevin S. LaBar et Tobias Egner. « Neural Mechanisms Mediating Contingent Capture of Attention by Affective Stimuli ». Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24, no 5 (mai 2012) : 1113–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00211.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Attention is attracted exogenously by physically salient stimuli, but this effect can be dampened by endogenous attention settings, a phenomenon called “contingent capture.” Emotionally salient stimuli are also thought to exert a strong exogenous influence on attention, especially in anxious individuals, but whether and how top–down attention can ameliorate bottom–up capture by affective stimuli is currently unknown. Here, we paired a novel spatial cueing task with fMRI to investigate contingent capture as a function of the affective salience of bottom–up cues (face stimuli) and individual differences in trait anxiety. In the absence of top–down cues, exogenous stimuli validly cueing targets facilitated attention in low-anxious participants, regardless of affective salience. However, although high-anxious participants exhibited similar facilitation following neutral exogenous cues, this facilitation was completely absent following affectively negative exogenous cues. Critically, these effects were contingent on endogenous attentional settings, such that explicit top–down cues presented before the appearance of exogenous stimuli removed anxious individuals' sensitivity to affectively salient stimuli. fMRI analyses revealed a network of brain regions underlying this variability in affective contingent capture across individuals, including the fusiform face area (FFA), posterior ventrolateral frontal cortex, and SMA. Importantly, activation in the posterior ventrolateral frontal cortex and the SMA fully mediated the effects observed in FFA, demonstrating a critical role for these frontal regions in mediating attentional orienting and interference resolution processes when engaged by affectively salient stimuli.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
7

Du, Feng, Yue Yin, Yue Qi et Kan Zhang. « Contingent orienting or contingent capture : A size singleton matching the target–distractor size relation cannot capture attention ». Psychonomic Bulletin & ; Review 21, no 4 (20 décembre 2013) : 1011–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0567-0.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
8

Wang, L., et S. B. Most. « Is contingent attentional capture not contingent on working memory ? » Journal of Vision 8, no 6 (20 mars 2010) : 1121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/8.6.1121.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
9

Serences, John T., Sarah Shomstein, Andrew B. Leber, Xavier Golay, Howard E. Egeth et Steven Yantis. « Coordination of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Attentional Control in Human Cortex ». Psychological Science 16, no 2 (février 2005) : 114–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00791.x.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Visual attention may be voluntarily directed to particular locations or features (voluntary control), or it may be captured by salient stimuli, such as the abrupt appearance of a new perceptual object (stimulus-driven control). Most often, however, the deployment of attention is the result of a dynamic interplay between voluntary attentional control settings (e.g., based on prior knowledge about a target's location or color) and the degree to which stimuli in the visual scene match these voluntary control settings. Consequently, nontarget items in the scene that share a defining feature with the target of visual search can capture attention, a phenomenon termed contingent attentional capture. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to show that attentional capture by target-colored distractors is accompanied by increased cortical activity in corresponding regions of retinotopically organized visual cortex. Concurrent activation in the temporo-parietal junction and ventral frontal cortex suggests that these regions coordinate voluntary and stimulus-driven attentional control settings to determine which stimuli effectively compete for attention.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
10

Schönhammer, Josef G., et Dirk Kerzel. « Detection costs and contingent attentional capture ». Attention, Perception, & ; Psychophysics 79, no 2 (28 novembre 2016) : 429–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1248-7.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
11

Wirth, Benedikt Emanuel, et Dirk Wentura. « Attentional bias to threat in the general population is contingent on target competition, not on attentional control settings ». Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71, no 4 (1 janvier 2018) : 975–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1307864.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Dot-probe studies usually find an attentional bias towards threatening stimuli only in anxious participants. Here, we investigated under what conditions such a bias occurs in unselected samples. According to contingent-capture theory, an irrelevant cue only captures attention if it matches an attentional control setting. Therefore, we first tested the hypothesis that an attentional control setting tuned to threat must be activated in (non-anxious) individuals. In Experiment 1, we used a dot-probe task with a manipulation of attentional control settings (‘threat’ – set vs. control set). Surprisingly, we found an (anxiety-independent) attentional bias to angry faces that was not moderated by attentional control settings. Since we presented two stimuli (i.e., a target and a distractor) on the target screen in Experiment 1 (a necessity to realise the test of contingent capture), but most dot-probe studies only employ a single target, we conducted Experiment 2 to test the hypothesis that attentional bias in the general population is contingent on target competition. Participants performed a dot-probe task, involving presentation of a stand-alone target or a target competing with a distractor. We found an (anxiety-independent) attentional bias towards angry faces in the latter but not the former condition. This suggests that attentional bias towards angry faces in unselected samples is not contingent on attentional control settings but on target competition.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
12

Hilchey, Matthew D., Blaire J. Weidler et Jay Pratt. « Statistical learning can modulate contingent attentional capture ». Journal of Vision 19, no 10 (6 septembre 2019) : 139c. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/19.10.139c.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
13

Liao, H. I., et S. L. Yeh. « Contingent attentional capture depends on stimulus properties ». Journal of Vision 11, no 11 (23 septembre 2011) : 85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/11.11.85.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
14

Wyble, Brad, Charles Folk et Mary C. Potter. « Contingent attentional capture by conceptually relevant images. » Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance 39, no 3 (2013) : 861–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030517.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
15

Livingstone, Ashley C., Gregory J. Christie, Richard D. Wright et John J. McDonald. « Signal enhancement, not active suppression, follows the contingent capture of visual attention. » Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance 43, no 2 (2017) : 219–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000339.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
16

Dubbelde, Dick, et Adam Greenberg. « Proportional Context of Distracters alters Top-Down Sets during Contingent Attention Capture ». Journal of Vision 17, no 10 (31 août 2017) : 947. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/17.10.947.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
17

ARIGA, A., et K. YOKOSAWA. « Contingent attentional capture occurs by activated target congruence ». Perception & ; Psychophysics 70, no 4 (1 mai 2008) : 680–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/pp.70.4.680.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
18

Folk, Charles L., Roger W. Remington et James C. Johnston. « Contingent attentional capture : A reply to Yantis (1993). » Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance 19, no 3 (1993) : 682–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.19.3.682.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
19

Barras, Caroline, et Dirk Kerzel. « ERP correlates of contingent attentional capture and suppression ». Journal of Vision 15, no 12 (1 septembre 2015) : 318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/15.12.318.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
20

Schmidt, James R., et Daniel H. Weissman. « Contingent attentional capture triggers the congruency sequence effect ». Acta Psychologica 159 (juillet 2015) : 61–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.05.007.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
21

Prasad et Mishra. « The Nature of Unconscious Attention to Subliminal Cues ». Vision 3, no 3 (1 août 2019) : 38. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision3030038.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Attentional selection in humans is mostly determined by what is important to them or by the saliency of the objects around them. How our visual and attentional system manage these various sources of attentional capture is one of the most intensely debated issues in cognitive psychology. Along with the traditional dichotomy of goal-driven and stimulus-driven theories, newer frameworks such as reward learning and selection history have been proposed as well to understand how a stimulus captures attention. However, surprisingly little is known about the different forms of attentional control by information that is not consciously accessible to us. In this article, we will review several studies that have examined attentional capture by subliminal cues. We will specifically focus on spatial cuing studies that have shown through response times and eye movements that subliminal cues can affect attentional selection. A majority of these studies have argued that attentional capture by subliminal cues is entirely automatic and stimulus-driven. We will evaluate their claims of automaticity and contrast them with a few other studies that have suggested that orienting to unconscious cues proceeds in a manner that is contingent with the top-down goals of the individual. Resolving this debate has consequences for understanding the depths and the limits of unconscious processing. It has implications for general theories of attentional selection as well. In this review, we aim to provide the current status of research in this domain and point out open questions and future directions.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
22

Folk, C., A. Berenato et B. Wyble. « Semantic Priming Produces Contingent Attentional Capture by Conceptual Content ». Journal of Vision 14, no 10 (22 août 2014) : 318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/14.10.318.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
23

Munneke, Jaap, Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort, David Sutterer, Jan Theeuwes et Edward Awh. « Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture ». NeuroImage 226 (février 2021) : 117562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117562.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
24

Liao, Hsin-I., et Su-Ling Yeh. « Capturing attention is not that simple : Different mechanisms for stimulus-driven and contingent capture ». Attention, Perception, & ; Psychophysics 75, no 8 (14 septembre 2013) : 1703–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0537-7.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
25

Moore, Katherine Sledge, et Daniel H. Weissman. « Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention : Evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigm ». Attention, Perception, & ; Psychophysics 72, no 6 (août 2010) : 1495–509. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/app.72.6.1495.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
26

Barratt, Daniel, et Claus Bundesen. « Attentional capture by emotional faces is contingent on attentional control settings ». Cognition & ; Emotion 26, no 7 (novembre 2012) : 1223–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.645279.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
27

Anderson, Brian A., et Charles L. Folk. « Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts : Evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture ». Attention, Perception, & ; Psychophysics 74, no 6 (7 juin 2012) : 1183–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0325-9.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
28

Winther, Gesche N., et Michael Niedeggen. « Distractor-Induced Blindness : A Special Case of Contingent Attentional Capture ? » Advances in Cognitive Psychology 13, no 1 (31 mars 2017) : 52–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/acp-0206-5.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
29

Folk, Charles L., Andrew B. Leber et Howard E. Egeth. « Made you blink ! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink ». Perception & ; Psychophysics 64, no 5 (juillet 2002) : 741–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/bf03194741.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
30

Huffman, Greg, Victoria M. Antinucci et Jay Pratt. « The illusion of control : Sequential dependencies underlie contingent attentional capture ». Psychonomic Bulletin & ; Review 25, no 6 (12 janvier 2018) : 2238–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1422-5.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
31

Ansorge, Ulrich, Gernot Horstmann et Ingrid Scharlau. « Top–down contingent attentional capture during feed-forward visual processing ». Acta Psychologica 135, no 2 (octobre 2010) : 123–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.05.008.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
32

Úlfsson, Tryggvi Örn. « Possibility of Science, Impossibility of Miracles : Léon Brunschvicg against Quentin Meillassoux ». Praktyka Teoretyczna 28, no 2 (15 octobre 2018) : 124–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/prt.2018.2.6.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
The article argues that, while Quentin Meillassoux‘s project, undertaken in After Finitude, merits attention, since the French philosopher is right that faith in sciences‘ capacity to open up new domains to thought must be restored, the solutions he offers have two serious shortcomings. 1) His depiction of science as the producer of ancestral statements does not capture satisfactorily the essence of scientific creativity. 2) The claim that everything is necessarily contingent is fundamentally incompatible with scientific knowledge. The article, then, contrasts Meillassoux‘s principle of the necessity of contingency with a principle that is extracted from the historical epistemology of Léon Brunschvicg and Antoine-Augustin Cournot. Instead of a principle of unreason, the article defends a principle of a metamorphosing reason founded on the practical impossibility of irreducible contingency.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
33

Blakely, D., T. Wright, W. Boot et J. Brockmole. « On The Precision of Attention Sets : Effects of Distractor Probability and Temporal Expectations on Contingent Capture ». Journal of Vision 11, no 11 (23 septembre 2011) : 81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/11.11.81.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
34

WANG, Hui-Yuan, Ai-Rui CHEN et Ming ZHANG. « Meaningful contingent attentional orienting effects : Spatial location-based inhibition and capture ». Acta Psychologica Sinica 53, no 2 (2021) : 113. http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1041.2021.00113.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
35

Van der Lubbe, Rob H. J., et Jurjen Van der Helden. « Failure of the extended contingent attentional capture account in multimodal settings ». Advances in Cognitive Psychology 2, no 4 (1 janvier 2006) : 255–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10053-008-0060-x.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
36

Atchley, Paul, Arthur F. Kramer et Anne P. Hillstrom. « Contingent capture for onsets and offsets : Attentional set for perceptual transients. » Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance 26, no 2 (2000) : 594–606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.594.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
37

Al-Aidroos, N., M. Giammarco, A. Paoletti et E. Guild. « Contingent attentional capture by stimuli that match long-term memory representations ». Journal of Vision 14, no 10 (22 août 2014) : 645. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/14.10.645.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
38

Moore, Katherine, Greg Ramos et Kathleen Trencheny. « Set-specific contingent attentional capture costs are modulated by color similarity ». Journal of Vision 15, no 12 (1 septembre 2015) : 311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/15.12.311.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
39

Mayer, Jutta S., Keisuke Fukuda, Edward K. Vogel et Sohee Park. « Impaired Contingent Attentional Capture Predicts Reduced Working Memory Capacity in Schizophrenia ». PLoS ONE 7, no 11 (12 novembre 2012) : e48586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048586.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
40

Moore, K., E. Wiemers, S. Lee et C. Santos. « Dual-target contingent attentional capture effects are modulated by associative learning ». Journal of Vision 13, no 9 (25 juillet 2013) : 87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/13.9.87.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
41

Glickman, Moshe, et Dominique Lamy. « Attentional capture by irrelevant emotional distractor faces is contingent on implicit attentional settings ». Cognition and Emotion 32, no 2 (10 mars 2017) : 303–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2017.1301883.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
42

Gibson, Bradley S., et Erin M. Kelsey. « Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features. » Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance 24, no 3 (1998) : 699–706. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.699.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
43

Blakely, D. P., R. S. Landbeck et W. R. Boot. « On the Precision of Attention Sets : The Effects of Spatial Context and Distractor Multiplicity on Contingent Capture ». Journal of Vision 12, no 9 (10 août 2012) : 1345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/12.9.1345.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
44

Reuss, Heiko, Carsten Pohl, Andrea Kiesel et Wilfried Kunde. « Follow the sign ! Top-down contingent attentional capture of masked arrow cues ». Advances in Cognitive Psychology 7, no -1 (1 janvier 2011) : 82–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10053-008-0091-3.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
45

Du, Feng, Jiaoyan Yang, Yue Yin, Kan Zhang et Richard A. Abrams. « On the automaticity of contingent capture : disruption caused by the attentional blink ». Psychonomic Bulletin & ; Review 20, no 5 (27 février 2013) : 944–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0410-7.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
46

Ito, Motohiro, et Jun I. Kawahara. « Contingent attentional capture across multiple feature dimensions in a temporal search task ». Acta Psychologica 163 (janvier 2016) : 107–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.11.009.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
47

Lu, Shena, et Shihui Han. « Attentional capture is contingent on the interaction between task demand and stimulus salience ». Attention, Perception, & ; Psychophysics 71, no 5 (juillet 2009) : 1015–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/app.71.5.1015.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
48

Ghorashi, S. M. Shahab, Samantha M. Zuvic, Troy A. W. Visser et Vincent Di Lollo. « Focal distraction : Spatial shifts of attentional focus are not required for contingent capture. » Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance 29, no 1 (2003) : 78–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.1.78.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
49

Lamy, D., L. Alon, N. Shalev et T. Carmel. « The role of conscious perception in contingent attentional capture and working memory updating ». Journal of Vision 14, no 10 (22 août 2014) : 643. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/14.10.643.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
50

Wu, C. t., D. H. Weissman et M. G. Woldorff. « Contingent attentional capture occurs only for irrelevant stimuli that can be consciously perceived ». Journal of Vision 6, no 6 (24 mars 2010) : 602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/6.6.602.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Nous offrons des réductions sur tous les plans premium pour les auteurs dont les œuvres sont incluses dans des sélections littéraires thématiques. Contactez-nous pour obtenir un code promo unique!

Vers la bibliographie