Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « Coalition war »
Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres
Sommaire
Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « Coalition war ».
À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.
Articles de revues sur le sujet "Coalition war"
Phillips, Julianne, et Scott Wolford. « Collective Deterrence in the Shadow of Shifting Power ». International Studies Quarterly 65, no 1 (21 janvier 2021) : 136–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaa095.
Texte intégralAhn, Jeongeun. « Formation and Prospects of the Coalition of North Korea, China, and Russia : Is It an Inevitable Consequence of the New Cold War ? Is It a Temporary Adhesion ? » East and West Studies 36, no 1 (20 mars 2024) : 147–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.29274/ews.2024.36.1.147.
Texte intégralMorey, Daniel S. « Centralized command and coalition victory ». Conflict Management and Peace Science 37, no 6 (15 juillet 2020) : 716–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0738894220934884.
Texte intégralGraham, Benjamin A. T., Erik Gartzke et Christopher J. Fariss. « The Bar Fight Theory of International Conflict : Regime Type, Coalition Size, and Victory ». Political Science Research and Methods 5, no 4 (1 octobre 2015) : 613–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2015.52.
Texte intégralCappella Zielinski, Rosella, et Ryan Grauer. « Organizing for performance : coalition effectiveness on the battlefield ». European Journal of International Relations 26, no 4 (10 février 2020) : 953–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354066120903369.
Texte intégralHenke, Marina E. « Buying Allies : Payment Practices in Multilateral Military Coalition-Building ». International Security 43, no 4 (avril 2019) : 128–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00345.
Texte intégralKegler, Michelle C., Ana Dekanosidze, Arevik Torosyan, Lilit Grigoryan, Shaheen Rana, Varduhi Hayrumyan, Zhanna Sargsyan et Carla J. Berg. « Community coalitions for smoke-free environments in Armenia and Georgia : A mixed methods analysis of coalition formation, implementation and perceived effectiveness ». PLOS ONE 18, no 8 (3 août 2023) : e0289149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289149.
Texte intégralStanley, Elizabeth A. « Ending the Korean War : The Role of Domestic Coalition Shifts in Overcoming Obstacles to Peace ». International Security 34, no 1 (juillet 2009) : 42–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/isec.2009.34.1.42.
Texte intégralSaylor, Ryan, et Nicholas C. Wheeler. « Paying for War and Building States ». World Politics 69, no 2 (6 mars 2017) : 366–408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0043887116000319.
Texte intégralSchweizer, Karl. « The Perils of Coalition War ». European Legacy 17, no 7 (10 septembre 2012) : 940–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2012.724010.
Texte intégralThèses sur le sujet "Coalition war"
Grieco, Kelly Ann. « War by coalition : the effects of coalition military institutionalization on coalition battlefield effectiveness ». Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/104572.
Texte intégralPage 381 blank. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references.
What accounts for variation in the military performance of coalitions and alliances on the battlefield? This dissertation presents and tests a realist-institutionalist theory of coalition military effectiveness, which accounts for both the process of capability aggregation within military coalitions and its implications for coalition fighting effectiveness. It posits that variation in the design of coalition institutions for political-military planning, command relationships and information exchanges significantly affects the ability of member nations to fight alongside each other on the battlefield. According to the theory, coalition military institutions provide the key mechanisms through which coalition members manage intra-alliance uncertainties and fears, thereby allowing for closer coordination of their war effort. The most effective military coalitions adopt joint political-military coalition planning, unity of command with an integrated command staff, and the fluid exchange of information among coalition nations. The study tests this theory through a mixed-methods approach, complimenting a medium-n statistical analysis with two detailed case studies of coalition wars fought under conditions chosen to provide maximum theoretical leverage. The medium-n statistical analysis examines all interstate coalition wars waged between 1816 and 2007 using the Correlates of War Inter-state War Data (version 4). Using primary documents, memoirs and battle histories, the study tests realist-institutionalist theory in two empirical cases: France and Britain in the First World War (1914-1918) and France and Britain in the Battle of France (May-June 1940). The main finding is that variation in the design of coalition military institutions accounts for differences in coalition battlefield effectiveness both across and within coalitions over time. The study makes three principal contributions. First, it offers the first serious treatment of coalition military effectiveness in the academic literature. Unlike other research, it expands beyond national military effectiveness to consider the coalition dimension. Second, the study contributes to a growing body of research suggesting the importance of non-material variables to explanations of military effectiveness, drawing attention to the critical importance of coalition military institutions for combat power. Finally, the study informs the public policy debate, suggesting whether the US and other allies could achieve battlefield success more quickly, with fewer casualties and at lower costs if it acted through ad-hoc military coalitions or institutionalized alliances.
by Kelly Ann Grieco.
Ph. D.
Brooke, Stephen James. « Labour's war : party, coalition and reconstruction 1939-45 ». Thesis, University of Oxford, 1988. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.291291.
Texte intégralNelson, Jeffrey C. « ABDACOM : America’s first coalition experience in World War II ». Thesis, Kansas State University, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/13618.
Texte intégralDepartment of History
David A. Graff
On December 7, 1941 the Japanese Empire launched a surprise attack on the United States at the Pearl Harbor naval base in the territory of Hawaii. The following day President Franklin D. Roosevelt declared war on Japan, and America was suddenly an active participant in a global war that had already been underway for over five years. World War II pitted the Axis (Japan, Germany, and Italy) against a coalition of allied nations that were united primarily by fear of Axis totalitarianism. Typically referred to as the Allies, the alliance’s most powerful participants included the United States, the Soviet Union, and Great Britain. However, many other nations were involved on the Allied side. Smaller European countries such as Holland, Belgium, and Poland fought with armed forces and governments in exile located in London after their homelands had been overrun by the Germans in 1939 and 1940. China had been at war with Japan since 1937. After the United States entered the war, allied action resulted in the creation of different, localized military coalitions between 1941 and 1945. These coalitions presented Allied leaders with unique problems created by the political, geographic, military and logistical issues of fighting war on a global scale. The earliest coalition in which the United States was involved was known by the acronym ABDACOM, short for the American, British, Dutch, Australian Command. ABDACOM’s mission was the defense of the Malay Barrier, which stretched from the Malay Peninsula through the Dutch East Indies to New Guinea, and the protection of the Southwest Pacific Area from Japanese invasion. In its brief two-month existence the ADBA coalition in the Southwest Pacific Area failed to prevent the Japanese from taking the Malay Barrier, Singapore, Burma and the islands between Java and the Philippines. This was due not to one overriding problem, but to a combination of planning, command, and logistical problems, compounded by the distance of Allied production and training centers from the front lines. These problems can be traced from the late 1930s to the dissolution of ABDACOM at the end of February 1942. Historians have often overlooked the underlying causes of the United States’ first foray into coalition warfare in World War II. To better understand why the Allied forces succumbed to the Japanese onslaught so quickly, one must look at political, military and economic relations between the United States and its allies prior to the onset of hostilities in 1941. Domestic political realities combined with international diplomatic differences kept the United States from openly preparing for coalition action until the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. The ensuing military coalition suffered from numerous deficiencies in command structure and logistics. Though pre-war planning existed within each of the Allied governments, the lack of cooperative action gave the Japanese military an insurmountable military advantage over the members of the ABDA coalition. Given the limited scope of this paper the focus will be on American participation in ABDACOM. The other countries involved will be included insomuch as they help to fill out the story of the United States and its first coalition effort in World War II. The story of the ABDACOM coalition is one of perseverance, creative planning, and deep stoicism in the face of overwhelming odds. The short life of the coalition gave planners in Washington, D.C. and London time to sort out potential conflicts between the Allies.
Pierce, James A. « Coalition war and burden-sharing : the President vs the Congress ». Thesis, Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 1991. http://hdl.handle.net/10945/26412.
Texte intégralthis thesis examines past U.S. approached to coalitions and efforts to forge alliances in peace and war in the 20th century. Specifically, it analyses the conflict between the executive and legislative branches with respect to coalition building and burden-sharing The thesis suggests that the amount of Congressional activism depends on the perception of an external threat among members of the legislative branch. Likewise, thesis highlights the tension between Congressional desires to impose the burden upon allies while retaining control over coalition policy and forces. The thesis concludes with a case study of Operation Desert Storm and burden-sharing. Finally, the author warns of dangerous precedent established by the shift in burden-sharing responsibilities in the recent past between the executive and legislative bodies.
Baltrusaitis, Daniel F. « Friends indeed ? coalition burden sharing and the war in Iraq / ». Connect to Electronic Thesis (ProQuest) Connect to Electronic Thesis (CONTENTdm), 2008. http://worldcat.org/oclc/436264265/viewonline.
Texte intégralSakul, Kahraman. « An Ottoman global moment War of Second Coalition in the Levant / ». Connect to Electronic Thesis (CONTENTdm), 2009. http://worldcat.org/oclc/489046550/viewonline.
Texte intégralMessman, Daniel M. « The Austrian Army in the War of the Sixth Coalition : A Reassessment ». Thesis, University of North Texas, 2020. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1752349/.
Texte intégralMillar, Russell W. « The development of Anglo-American Naval strategy in the period of the second world war,1938-1941 ». Thesis, King's College London (University of London), 1988. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.558406.
Texte intégralBaker, William Casey. « Between Coalition and Unilateralism : The British War Machine in the Mediterranean, 1793-1796 ». Thesis, University of North Texas, 2020. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1752351/.
Texte intégralFritz, Alarik M. « How superpowers go to war and why other states help them the impact of asymmetric security interdependence on war coalition formation / ». Connect to Electronic Thesis (ProQuest) Connect to Electronic Thesis (CONTENTdm), 2008. http://worldcat.org/oclc/453941583/viewonline.
Texte intégralLivres sur le sujet "Coalition war"
Bowers, Ian. Coalition Navies during the Korean War. London : Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781032626574.
Texte intégralMatloff, Maurice. Strategic planning for coalition warfare. Washington, D.C : Center of Military History, U.S. Army, 1999.
Trouver le texte intégralKober, Avi. Coalition defection : The dissolution of the Arab anti-Israeli coalitions in war and peace. Westport, Conn : Praeger, 2002.
Trouver le texte intégralWallach, Jehuda Lothar. Uneasy coalition : The entente experience in World War I. Westport, Conn : Greenwood Press, 1993.
Trouver le texte intégralMatloff, Maurice. Strategic planning for coalition warfare, 1941-1942. Washington, D.C : Center of Military History, U.S. Army, 1999.
Trouver le texte intégralStanley, Elizabeth A. Paths to peace : Domestic coalition shifts, war termination and the Korean War. Stanford, Calif : Stanford University Press, 2009.
Trouver le texte intégralBaltrusaitis, Daniel F. Coalition politics and the Iraq War : Determinants of choice. Boulder, Colo : FirstForumPress, 2009.
Trouver le texte intégralBaltrusaitis, Daniel F. Coalition politics and the Iraq War : Determinants of choice. Boulder, Colo : FirstForumPress, 2009.
Trouver le texte intégralBaltrusaitis, Daniel F. Coalition politics and the Iraq War : Determinants of choice. Boulder, Colo : FirstForumPress, 2010.
Trouver le texte intégralAuthority, Coalition Provisional. Sulṭat al-Iʼtilāf al-Muʼaqqatah : Coalition Provisional Authority. Bagdad : Coalition Provisional Authority, 2003.
Trouver le texte intégralChapitres de livres sur le sujet "Coalition war"
Oliver, Timothy J. « The Coalition and War ». Dans The Cameron-Clegg Coalition and Britain’s Role in the World, 69–107. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80995-9_3.
Texte intégralDiNardo, Richard L. « Axis Coalition Building ». Dans A Companion to World War II, 403–14. Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118325018.ch24.
Texte intégralArnot, R. Page. « Under the Coalition Government ». Dans The Miners in Crisis and War, 102–44. London : Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003402305-3.
Texte intégralSanders, Deborah. « Small Navies in Naval Coalition Operations ». Dans Coalition Navies during the Korean War, 14–26. London : Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781032626574-2.
Texte intégralDimitrov, Vesselin. « Wartime Coalition : Unity and Conflict (September 1944–April 1945) ». Dans Stalin's Cold War, 69–103. London : Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230591066_4.
Texte intégralPaget, Steven. « A Small but Significant Contribution ». Dans Coalition Navies during the Korean War, 84–98. London : Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781032626574-7.
Texte intégralWilliamson, Corbin. « The U.S. Navy and Combined Naval Operations during the Korean War ». Dans Coalition Navies during the Korean War, 27–39. London : Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781032626574-3.
Texte intégralChoi, Timothy Hiu-Tung. « The Royal Canadian Navy ». Dans Coalition Navies during the Korean War, 99–111. London : Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781032626574-8.
Texte intégralYu, Jihoon, et Erik French. « The ROKN and Coalition Naval Operations in the Korean War ». Dans Coalition Navies during the Korean War, 40–56. London : Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781032626574-4.
Texte intégralBenbow, Tim. « Between Following and Leading ». Dans Coalition Navies during the Korean War, 57–71. London : Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781032626574-5.
Texte intégralActes de conférences sur le sujet "Coalition war"
Sukhobokova, O. О. « Formation of an international military-technical coalition support for Ukraine : the British factor ». Dans THE WAR IN UKRAINE – A CHALLENGE TO EURO-ATLANTIC CIVILIZATIONAL VALUES. Baltija Publishing, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-451-1-16.
Texte intégralNguyen, Hoang Nga, et Abdur Rakib. « A Probabilistic Logic for Resource-Bounded Multi-Agent Systems ». Dans Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence {IJCAI-19}. California : International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2019/74.
Texte intégralBlokhin, Ivan O., et Vitaly А. Epshteyn. « THE POLITICS OF HISTORICAL MEMORY OF THE SECOND WORLD WAR IN SERBIA ON THE EXAMPLE OF SPEECHES BY REPRESENTATIVES OF THE RULING COALITION ON THE OCCASION OF VICTORY DAY OVER FASCISM ». Dans Социальные и гуманитарные науки в условиях вызовов современности. Комсомольск-на-Амуре : Комсомольский-на-Амуре государственный университет, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.17084/978-5-7765-1527-9-2022-325.
Texte intégralZick, Yair, Kobi Gal, Yoram Bachrach et Moshe Mash. « How to Form Winning Coalitions in Mixed Human-Computer Settings ». Dans Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. California : International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/66.
Texte intégralTHOMPSON, MARIAN KAY. « BUILDING ENVIRONMENTAL COALITIONS AND THE BLACK SEA ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVE ». Dans International Seminar on Nuclear War and Planetary Emergencies 25th Session. Singapore : World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789812797001_0020.
Texte intégralKuba, Ondřej, et Jan Stejskal. « The Analysis of Coalition Parties´ Election Programme Fulfillment : Czech Case Study ». Dans 2nd International Conference on Business, Management and Finance. Acavent, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.33422/2nd.icbmf.2019.11.776.
Texte intégralYEŞİLBURSA, Behçet Kemal. « THE FORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF POLITICAL PARTIES IN TURKEY (1908-1980) ». Dans 9. Uluslararası Atatürk Kongresi. Ankara : Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi Yayınları, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.51824/978-975-17-4794-5.08.
Texte intégralLang, Jérôme. « Collective Decision Making under Incomplete Knowledge : Possible and Necessary Solutions ». Dans Twenty-Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Seventeenth Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence {IJCAI-PRICAI-20}. California : International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2020/680.
Texte intégralGüvenek, Burcu, Zeynep Karaçor et Abdul Qahar Khatir. « CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR INVESTMENT IN AFGHANISTAN DURING THE COALITION FORCES’ SUPPORT FOR THE GOVERNMENT ». Dans 12th International Scientific Conference „Business and Management 2022“. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/bm.2022.805.
Texte intégralBennike, Kathrine Bjerg, Poul Meier Melchiorsen et Gunnar Sivertsen. « An institutional implementation of the new European reform of research assessment ». Dans 27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023). International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.55835/64426bdc67b1730895c01156.
Texte intégralRapports d'organisations sur le sujet "Coalition war"
Conway, John L. CADRE Quick-Look : Homeland Security-NORTHCOM's Coalition War. Fort Belvoir, VA : Defense Technical Information Center, février 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada432513.
Texte intégralSterling, Jr, et Robert R. Desert Storm. The War The Coalition Almost Lost. Fort Belvoir, VA : Defense Technical Information Center, janvier 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada264430.
Texte intégralHoeing, Jr, et Joseph B. War with Iran : Considerations for the Next Coalition Campaign. Fort Belvoir, VA : Defense Technical Information Center, juin 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada265374.
Texte intégralMartin, Hollie J. Coalition Logistics : The Way to Win the Peace, The Way to Win the War. Fort Belvoir, VA : Defense Technical Information Center, juin 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada479146.
Texte intégralMurphy, John D. An Analysis of the United States-Led Coalition Air Campaign Conducted During the 1991 War with IRAQ : Desert Storm. Fort Belvoir, VA : Defense Technical Information Center, janvier 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada401042.
Texte intégralBiancalana, Cecilia. Italy’s multiple populisms facing the Russo-Ukrainian war. European Center for Populism Studies (ECPS), mars 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.55271/rp0022.
Texte intégralAuers, Daunis. The Russia-Ukraine War and Right-Wing Populism in Latvia. European Center for Populism Studies (ECPS), mars 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.55271/rp0023.
Texte intégralMuller, Paul L. MPAT : A Coalition Warm Starter. Fort Belvoir, VA : Defense Technical Information Center, novembre 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada476632.
Texte intégralCiuca, Nicolae I. Roles of Alliances and Coalitions in the War on Terrorism. Fort Belvoir, VA : Defense Technical Information Center, mars 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada449424.
Texte intégralChokheli, Salome. Geneva International Discussions : Russian Occupation and Internally Displaced Persons in Georgia. Eurasia Institutes, avril 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.47669/eea-1-2023.
Texte intégral