Bibliographies thématiques / Cardiac catheterization / Articles de revues

Articles de revues sur le sujet « Cardiac catheterization »

Pour voir les autres types de publications sur ce sujet consultez le lien suivant : Cardiac catheterization.
Auteur : Grafiati
Publié le 4 juin 2021
Mis à jour le 28 février 2023

Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres

Choisissez une source :

Consultez les 50 meilleurs articles de revues pour votre recherche sur le sujet « Cardiac catheterization ».

À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.

Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.

Parcourez les articles de revues sur diverses disciplines et organisez correctement votre bibliographie.

1

Alkhawam, H., R. Sogomonian, N. Vyas, J. Sayanlar, D. Rubinstein et M. Kabach. « ID : 8 : 30-DAY READMISSION RATE OF PATIENTS UNDERGOING CORONARY CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION IN THE AMBULATORY VERSUS IN-HOSPITAL SETTING ». Journal of Investigative Medicine 64, no 4 (22 mars 2016) : 921.2–921. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jim-2016-000120.21.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
BackgroundCardiac Catheterizationis increasingly performed in an outpatient setting. No study has been large enough to detect differences in the major complication rate which occur infrequently in whichever setting, and there is considerable variation between studies in the incidence of minor complications after outpatient procedures.ObjectiveTo investigate the 30-days readmission rate of ambulatory and in-hospital coronary cardiac Catheterization.MethodA retrospective study of 9053 patients who had coronary cardiac angiography between 2005 and 2014. We divided the patients in to two groups, patients who had cardiac Catheterizationin ambulatory setting versus in-hospital setting.ResultsOf 9053 patients, 5998 (66%) patients had in-hospital cardiac Catheterizationand 3,055 (34%) had ambulatory cardiac catheterization. Patients who had ambulatory coronary cardiac Catheterizationhad a higher 30-days readmission rate comparing to in-hospital setting (Odd ratio: 3.2, 95% CI: 2.8–3.7, p<0.0001).Gender analysis, 27% of males who had ambulatory coronary cardiac Catheterizationreadmitted within 30-days of discharge versus 12% of females (OR: 2.4, 95% CI: 2–2.9, p<0.0001). Among in-hospital setting, no statistically significant between males and females (p=0.6).ConclusionOur study showed that ambulatory coronary cardiac Catheterization associated with a higher 30-days readmission rate comparing to in-hospital setting. Furthermore, males who had ambulatory cardiac Catheterization seem to have more 30-days readmission rate.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Lo, Ted SN, Gurbir Bhatia et Jim Nolan. « Cardiac catheterization ». Medicine 34, no 4 (avril 2006) : 153–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1383/medc.2006.34.4.153.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
3

Fraser, Douglas, H. Sandmann et J. Nolan. « Cardiac Catheterization ». Medicine 30, no 3 (mars 2002) : 36–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1383/medc.30.3.36.28279.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
4

Goyal, Deepak, Karim Ratib, Rajay Narain et Jim Nolan. « Cardiac catheterization ». Medicine 38, no 7 (juillet 2010) : 390–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mpmed.2010.04.006.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
5

Holroyd, Eric, M. Adnan Nadir, Karim Ratib et Jim Nolan. « Cardiac catheterization ». Medicine 42, no 8 (août 2014) : 468–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mpmed.2014.05.017.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
6

Schwarz, Konstantin, Muhammad Ayyaz Ul Haq, Bharat Sidhu et Jim Nolan. « Cardiac catheterization ». Medicine 46, no 8 (août 2018) : 488–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mpmed.2018.05.014.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
7

Pappenheim, Christine L., et Brenda Kirkpatrick. « Cardiac Catheterization ». AORN Journal 48, no 6 (décembre 1988) : 1130–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0001-2092(07)69781-6.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
8

Kosova, Ethan, et Mark Ricciardi. « Cardiac Catheterization ». JAMA 317, no 22 (13 juin 2017) : 2344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.0708.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
9

Kulairi, Zain, Nisha Deol, Renee Tolly, Rohan Manocha et Maliha Naseer. « Is Intravenous Heparin a Contraindication for TPA in Ischemic Stroke ? » Case Reports in Neurological Medicine 2017 (2017) : 1–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9280961.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
There are approximately 2 million cardiac catheterizations that occur every year in the United States and with an aging population this number continues to rise. Adverse events due to this procedure occur at low rates and include stroke, arrhythmia, and myocardial infarctions. Due to the high volume of procedures there are a growing number of adverse events. Stroke after cardiac catheterization (SCC) has an incidence between 0.27 and 0.5% and is one of the most debilitating complications leading to high rates of mortality and morbidity. Given the relatively uncommon clinical setting of stroke after cardiac catheterization, treatment protocols regarding the use of IV or IA thrombolysis have not been adequately developed. Herein, we describe a case of a 39-year-old male who developed a stroke following a cardiac catheterization where IV thrombolysis was utilized although the patient was on heparin prior to cardiac catheterization.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
10

Morgan-Hughes, N. « Essential Cardiac Catheterization ». British Journal of Anaesthesia 99, no 6 (décembre 2007) : 924. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aem319.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
11

Benson, Lee. « Interventional cardiac catheterization ». Current Opinion in Cardiology 5, no 1 (février 1990) : 40–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001573-199002000-00007.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
12

Hellenbrand, William E. « Interventional cardiac catheterization ». Current Opinion in Cardiology 6, no 1 (février 1991) : 110–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001573-199102000-00018.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
13

Rocchini, Albert P. « Pediatric cardiac catheterization ». Current Opinion in Cardiology 17, no 3 (mai 2002) : 283–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001573-200205000-00013.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
14

Walder, Lon A., et Frederick A. Schaller. « Diagnostic cardiac catheterization ». Postgraduate Medicine 97, no 3 (mars 1995) : 37–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00325481.1995.11945967.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
15

Pihkala, Jaana, David Nykanen, Robert M. Freedom et Lee N. Benson. « INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION ». Pediatric Clinics of North America 46, no 2 (avril 1999) : 441–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70128-0.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
16

Conti, C. Richard. « Outpatient Cardiac Catheterization ». New England Journal of Medicine 319, no 19 (10 novembre 1988) : 1282–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/nejm198811103191910.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
17

STACK, RICHARD S., ERIC B. CARLSON, TOMOAKI HINOHARA et HARRY R. PHILLIPS. « Interventional Cardiac Catheterization ». Investigative Radiology 20, no 4 (juillet 1985) : 333–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004424-198507000-00002.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
18

Siragusa, Vincent. « Ambulatory cardiac catheterization ». American Heart Journal 112, no 6 (décembre 1986) : 1353–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(86)90398-4.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
19

Pepine, Carl J., Francis J. Klocke, Hugh D. Allen, William W. Parmley, Thomas M. Bashore, Thomas A. Ports, Jeffrey A. Brinker et al. « ACC/AHA guidelines for cardiac catheterization and cardiac catheterization laboratories ». Journal of the American College of Cardiology 18, no 5 (novembre 1991) : 1149–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(91)90533-f.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
20

Dubey, L., et SK Sharma. « Cardiac catheterization and complications : initial experience ». Journal of College of Medical Sciences-Nepal 8, no 2 (12 septembre 2012) : 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jcmsn.v8i2.6830.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Cardiac catheterization for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes has been routinely used since last one year in College of Medical Sciences and Teaching Hospital, Bharatpur, Nepal. Because all cardiac catheterizations involve the insertion of cardiac catheters into the circulatory system, it should not be surprising that a variety of complications can ensue. These complications range from minor problems with no long-term sequelae to major problem even death. A total of 357 consecutive diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac catheterization performed in College of Medical Sciences and Teaching Hospital, Bharatpur between April 2011 to April 2012 were evaluated for their complications. Among them 220 (61.6%) were coronary angiogram, 65 (18.2 %) percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and stenting, 7 ( 1.9 %) permanent pacemaker insertion, 65 (18.2%) were others including temporary pacemaker insertion, peripheral angiography and carotid angiography. There were 3 deaths (0.84%). Two deaths occurred following coronary angiogram and 1 death following PTCA stenting. Vascular complications occurred in 5 (1.4% patients) with groin haematoma in all. Contrast allergy occurred in 9 (2.5 %), vasovagal reaction in 2 (0.56%), pyrogen reaction in 6 (1.6%), and contrast induced nephropathy occurred in 3 (0.84%) patients. Cardiac catheterization procedure in CMS-TH, Bharatpur has acceptable low complications including death. Journal of College of Medical Sciences-Nepal,2012,Vol-8,No-2, 1-6 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jcmsn.v8i2.6830
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
21

Simon, A., B. Bumgarner, K. Clark et S. Israel. « Manual versus mechanical compression for femoral artery hemostasis after cardiac catheterization ». American Journal of Critical Care 7, no 4 (1 juillet 1998) : 308–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.4037/ajcc1998.7.4.308.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
BACKGROUND: Most cardiac catheterizations are performed via femoral artery access. Reported rates of both peripheral vascular complications and success rates for the use of manual and mechanical compression techniques to achieve femoral artery hemostasis after cardiac catheterization vary. OBJECTIVE: To determine is use of a mechanical clamp is as effective as standard manual pressure for femoral artery hemostasis after cardiac catheterization. METHODS: Subjects consisted of 720 patients from 2 community hospitals who had elective diagnostic cardiac catheterization via the femoral artery. The control group (n=343) received manual compression for hemostasis; the study group (n=377) received mechanical compression. Standard protocols were used for the 2 compression techniques. Pressure was applied for a minimum of 10 minutes for 5F and 6F sheaths and catheters and for a minimum of 15 minutes for 7F and 8F sheaths and catheters. Prospective data were collected and analyzed for each patients, including sheath or catheter size, blood pressure, height, weight, age, time from administration of local anesthetic to successful cannulation of the femoral artery, anticoagulation status, total compression time, physician performing the catheterization procedure, nurse or technician who obtained hemostasis, and complications. In follow-up, patients were asked site-specific and functional status questions 1 to 2 days after the catheterization procedure and again 3 days after the catheterization procedure. RESULTS: Data were analyzed by using frequency distributions, measures of central tendency, and measures of variability. Only 1 difference between the 2 groups was significant: manual compression time was 14.93 +/- minutes, whereas mechanical compression time was 17.13 +/- minutes. CONCLUSION: Mechanical compression is as effective as manual compression for femoral artery hemostasis after cardiac catheterization.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
22

Yeh, Mary J., Elizabeth Lydon, Kimberlee Gauvreau, Kathy J. Jenkins, David Slater et Lisa Bergersen. « Exploring procedure duration and risk for serious adverse events during congenital cardiac catheterization ». BMJ Surgery, Interventions, & ; Health Technologies 5, no 1 (janvier 2023) : e000142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000142.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
ObjectivesWhile procedure length is considered an important metric for cardiothoracic surgical procedures, the relationship between procedure length and adverse events (AEs) in congenital cardiac catheterizations has little published data available. Furthermore, most existing congenital cardiac catheterization risk prediction models are built on logistic regression models. This study aimed to characterize the relationship between case length and AE occurrence in congenital cardiac catheterization while adjusting for known risk factors and to investigate the potential role of non-linear analysis in risk modeling.DesignAge, case type, and procedure duration were evaluated for relationships with the primary outcome using logistic regression. Non-linearity of the associations with continuous risk factors was assessed using restricted cubic spline transformations.Setting and participantsAll diagnostic and interventional congenital cardiac catheterization cases performed at Boston Children’s Hospital between January 1, 2014 and October 31, 2019 were analyzed.Main outcome measureThe primary outcome was defined as the occurrence of any clinically significant (level 3/4/5) AE.ResultsA total of 7011 catheterization cases met inclusion criteria, with interventional procedures accounting for 68% of cases. Median case duration was 97 min. A multivariable model including age, procedure type, and case duration showed a significant relationship between case duration and AE occurrence (OR 1.07 per 10 min increase, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.09, p<0.001).ConclusionsThis study demonstrated the importance of procedure duration as a potential frontier for procedure risk management. Better understanding of the role of procedure duration in cardiac catheterizations may provide opportunities for quality improvement in patient safety and resource planning.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
23

Mullins, C. E. « History of Pediatric Interventional Catheterization : Pediatric Therapeutic Cardiac Catheterizations ». Pediatric Cardiology 19, no 1 (janvier 1998) : 3–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002469900236.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
24

Engle, Mary Allen. « Cardiac Surgery Without Preoperative Cardiac Catheterization ». Pediatric Annals 16, no 8 (1 août 1987) : 623–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/0090-4481-19870801-07.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
25

Perler, B. A. « Surgical Treatment of Femoral Pseudoaneurysm following Cardiac Catheterization ». Cardiovascular Surgery 1, no 2 (avril 1993) : 118–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/096721099300100206.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Over a period of 8 years, 31 femoral pseudoaneurysms following cardiac catheterization were surgically repaired in 15 men and 15 women ranging in age from 38 to 89 (mean 68.1) years. The catheterizations were performed for evaluation of coronary artery disease in 23 patients (77%), valvular heart disease in three (10%), both coronary artery disease and valvular disease in two (7%) and for other reasons in two (7%). Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was performed in eight patients (27%) and aortic valvuloplasty in one (3%). Surgical repair was performed from 1 to 47 (mean 10.2) days after catheterization under local anesthesia in 16 patients (52%). regional anesthesia in ten (32%) and general anesthesia in five (16%). All lesions were repaired by primary suture. The operating time ranged from 25 to 90 (mean 50.5) min and intraoperative blood loss from 50 to 900 (mean 259.2) ml. There were no operative deaths and one postoperative myocardial infarction. No patients have developed recurrent pseudoaneurysm, with follow-up ranging from 1 to 53 (mean 11.4) months. These results demonstrate that the surgical repair of femoral pseudoaneurysm following cardiac catheterization is safe, effective and durable.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
26

Montes, Patricia. « Managing Outpatient Cardiac Catheterization ». American Journal of Nursing 97, no 8 (août 1997) : 34. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3465318.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
27

Tremko, Laurie A. « Understanding Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterization ». American Journal of Nursing 97, no 2 (février 1997) : 16K. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3465485.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
28

Lippmann, Maurice, et Richard S. Ginsburg. « Propofol in Cardiac Catheterization ». Anesthesia & ; Analgesia 75, no 5 (novembre 1992) : 859. http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199211000-00039.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
29

Kao, Y. James, et Richard G. Norton. « Propofol in Cardiac Catheterization ». Anesthesia & ; Analgesia 75, no 5 (novembre 1992) : 859???860. http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199211000-00040.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
30

Reich, David L. « Propofol in Cardiac Catheterization ». Anesthesia & ; Analgesia 75, no 5 (novembre 1992) : 860. http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199211000-00041.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
31

&NA;. « The Cardiac Catheterization Handbook ». American Journal of Nursing 96, no 6 (juin 1996) : 16L. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000446-199606000-00024.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
32

Tremko, Laurie A. « Understanding Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterization ». American Journal of Nursing 97, no 2 (février 1997) : 16K—16R. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000446-199702000-00017.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
33

Allen, Hugh D., Robert H. Beekman, Arthur Garson, Ziyad M. Hijazi, Charles Mullins, Martin P. O’Laughlin et Kathryn A. Taubert. « Pediatric Therapeutic Cardiac Catheterization ». Circulation 97, no 6 (17 février 1998) : 609–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.97.6.609.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
34

Harper, John P. « Post-Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterization ». Journal for Nurses in Staff Development (JNSD) 23, no 6 (novembre 2007) : 271–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.nnd.0000300833.54159.12.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
35

Montes, Patricia. « Managing Outpatient Cardiac Catheterization ». American Journal of Nursing 97, no 8 (août 1997) : 34–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000446-199708000-00034.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
36

Vinall, M., et G. Aleong. « Update on Cardiac Catheterization ». MD Conference Express 13, no 14 (1 octobre 2013) : 20–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/155989771314011.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
37

Miller, Gregory L. « HANDBOOK OF CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION ». Chest 100, no 5 (novembre 1991) : 16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0012-3692(16)33650-9.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
38

Perleth, Matthias, Hermann Mannebach, Reinhard Busse, Ulrich Gleichmann et Friedrich Wilhelm Schwartz. « CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION IN GERMANY ». International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 15, no 4 (octobre 1999) : 756–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266462399154151.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Objective: To describe the diffusion of cardiac catheterization technologies and time trends of their use according to setting and geographic region in Germany during a 13-year period. It is hypothesized that the cardiac catheterization technology has matured from an experimental state to a broadly accepted technology.Methods: Data come from the annual survey of the German Society for Cardiovascular Research. All German cardiac catheterization units are requested to provide data on volume and type of catheterization procedures. Data are available from 1984 to 1996. Number and type of procedure, type of unit, diagnoses, and complications are all recorded. The overall response rate is 90%, on average.Results: The total number of catheterization units was 324 in 1996, or an average of 3.69 units per 1 million population. In 1996, all of the East German Länder and districts were below average. Utilization of cardiac catheterization procedures increased exponentially during the study period. The number of angiographies rose from about 45,000 in 1984 to more than 450,000 in 1996; the number of angioplasties increased almost by a factor of 50 to 125,000 procedures in 1996. Inverse correlations between the rates per million population of either coronary angiographies or PTCAs and mortality rates from ischemic heart disease were observed at the level of the German Länder.Conclusion: Further studies taking patient characteristics, long-term outcomes, and other factors in account are necessary to clarify the large geographic variations and the negative relationship between utilization rates and coronary heart disease mortality found in this study.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
39

Huber, Charlotte. « Safety After Cardiac Catheterization ». AJN, American Journal of Nursing 109, no 8 (août 2009) : 57–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.naj.0000358503.52667.bf.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
40

Holmes, David R. « Cardiac Catheterization and Angiography ». Mayo Clinic Proceedings 62, no 5 (mai 1987) : 420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0025-6196(12)65451-2.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
41

Saxena, Anita, Pankaj Vohra, Yogesh Jain, Suresh Narayanan et R. Krishna Kumar. « Umbilical vein cardiac catheterization ». American Heart Journal 126, no 6 (décembre 1993) : 1494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(93)90570-y.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
42

Goss, Jerome E., et Airlie Cameron. « Mobile cardiac catheterization laboratories ». Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis 26, no 1 (mai 1992) : 71–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1810260116.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
43

Roger, Hugues. « Radiodermatitis Following Cardiac Catheterization ». Archives of Dermatology 133, no 2 (1 février 1997) : 242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1997.03890380116022.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
44

D'Incan, M. « Radiodermatitis following cardiac catheterization ». Archives of Dermatology 133, no 2 (1 février 1997) : 242–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archderm.133.2.242.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
45

FeMman, Robert L. « Cardiac catheterization by nonphysicians ». American Journal of Cardiology 62, no 1 (juillet 1988) : 172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(88)91400-2.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
46

Krishnaswami, V. « Cardiac catheterization by nonphysicians ». American Journal of Cardiology 62, no 1 (juillet 1988) : 172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(88)91401-4.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
47

Javorski, Joseph J., Dolly D. Hansen, Peter C. Laussen, M. Lizanne Fox, Josée Lavoie et Frederick A. Burrows. « Paediatric cardiac catheterization : innovations ». Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 42, no 4 (avril 1995) : 310–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf03010708.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
48

Gautam, Nischal K., Kayla Bober, James A. Pierre, Olga Pawelek et Evelyn Griffin. « Deep Tracheal Extubation Using Dexmedetomidine in Children With Congenital Heart Disease Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization : Advantages and Complications ». Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 23, no 4 (20 août 2019) : 387–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1089253219870628.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Objective. Deep tracheal extubation using dexmedetomidine is safe and provides smooth recovery in children with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac catheterization. Design. Single-institution, retrospective study of prospectively collected data. Participants. All patients aged between 1 month and 5 years who underwent general endotracheal anesthesia for diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterizations in the cardiac catheterization suite from January 2015 (change in standard operating procedure) through October 2016 (approval of institutional review board for study). Measurement and Main Results. One hundred and eighty-nine patients (81%) of the 232 patients who underwent cardiac catheterization during the study period were noted to undergo deep tracheal extubation. Cyanotic heart disease was present in 87 patients (46%), history of prematurity in 51 (27%), and pulmonary hypertension in 26 (14%) patients. A documented smooth recovery in the postoperative care unit (PACU) requiring no additional analgesics or sedatives was observed in 91% of the patients. The majority of patients required no airway support after deep extubation (n = 140, 74%, P = .136). The presence of pulmonary hypertension (odds ratio = 4.45, P = .035) and presence of a cough on the day of the procedure (odds ratio = 7.10, P = .03) were significantly associated with the use of oxygen or use of oral airway for greater than 20 minutes in the PACU. After extubation, there were no reported events of aspiration, the use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, reintubation, heart block, or systemic hypotension requiring treatment or cardiac arrest. Conclusions. Deep extubation using dexmedetomidine in infants and toddlers after cardiac catheterization is feasible and enables smooth postoperative recovery with minimal adverse effects.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
49

Alkhawam, H., R. Sogomonian, N. Vyas, A. Al-khazraji, JJ Lieber, R. Madanieh, TJ Vittorio et M. Kabach. « ID : 4 : OUTCOMES IN CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE PATIENTS UNDERGOING TRANSFEMORAL VERSUS TRANSRADIAL CARDIAC CATHETRIZATION : RESTROSPECTIVE CHART ANALYSIS ». Journal of Investigative Medicine 64, no 4 (22 mars 2016) : 921.1–921. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jim-2016-000120.20.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
BackgroundSeveral studies addressed outcomes in terms of NACE and MACE in patients undergoing transradial vs tranfemoral cardiac catheterization. However, data on core quality measures such as length of stay and rehospitalization rates is lacking in the congestive heart failure population.MethodA retrospective chart analysis of 9,320 patients who were admitted to the hospital for chest pain and underwent cardiac catheterization. Based on ICD-9 codes, we included only patients with Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) with an Ejection Fracture ≤40 (HFrEF). We compared readmission rate and Length of stay in patients who underwent Transradial cardiac catheterization vs Transfemoral cardiac catheterization.ResultsOf a total 9,320 patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography, 800 patients had HFrEF. Four hundred patients underwent Transradial cardiac catheterization and 400 patients underwent Transfemoral cardiac catheterization. In the transfemoral cardiac catheterization group, 37 (9%) were readmitted within 30 days of discharge while 17 (4%) patients of 400 patients who underwent transradial cardiac catheterization were readmitted within 30 days of discharged (Odds ratio: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.8–3, p value 0.005).Length of stay was ∼5.2 days in transradial catheterization vs. ∼6 days in Transfemoral catheterization group (p 0.4).ConclusionIn our study population, transradial cardiac catheterization in HFrEF patients seemed to have a better outcome when compared to transfemoral cardiac catheterization in terms of 30-days readmission rate. Length of hospital stay was higher in the transfemoral group but did not achieve statistical significance, however. Larger studies that may also include patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are needed to investigate factors that may contribute to such outcomes.
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
50

Panicker, Thomas Mathew, Sonia Cherian et Rejimol Thomas. « Cardiac Nurses’ Knowledge towards Patient Safety after Cardiac Catheterization ; A Cross Sectional Study ». International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research 7, no 2 (5 avril 2022) : 6–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.52403/ijshr.20220402.

Texte intégral
Résumé :
Background: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in UAE. Coronary heart disease is a common term for the buildup of plaque in the heart’s arteries that could lead to heart attack. Cardiac catheterization is a procedure to examine how well the heart is working. Patient safety is defined as being free from accidental harm as a result of a health care encounter. Cardiac nurses are responsible for providing patient’s safety and minimizing vascular complications after cardiac catheterization procedures. This study explored the knowledge of cardiac nurses working in DHA Hospitals, with regard to patient safety after cardiac catheterization. Methods: This is a descriptive quantitative study which was conducted in DHA Hospitals, UAE between the periods October 2020 till December 2020. A convenience sampling technique was used for this study with 108 cardiac nurses working in DHA. Results: The knowledge percentage of cardiac nurses on patient safety revealed that 64.81% were had moderate knowledge,15.74% had adequate knowledge level whereas 19.44% were had poor level of knowledge regarding patient safety after cardiac catheterization. Conclusion and Recommendation: The study concluded that cardiac nurses reflected moderate level of knowledge. It was statistically proven that there was a significant association of knowledge regarding patient safety after cardiac catheterization among cardiac nurses with their age, job experience and years of experience in cardiac unit. There is a need to follow innovative approaches in training and consider to include post cardiac catheterization care in education session. Keywords: [Nurses, Knowledge, cardiac catheterization, Cardiovascular, Patient.]
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Vous pouvez également être intéressé par les bibliographies sur le sujet « Cardiac catheterization » pour d’autres types de sources :
Thèses Livres
Nous offrons des réductions sur tous les plans premium pour les auteurs dont les œuvres sont incluses dans des sélections littéraires thématiques. Contactez-nous pour obtenir un code promo unique!

Vers la bibliographie