Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « Alliage colle »

Despite the long tradition in psychotherapy research literature concerning the role of therapeutic alliance (TA), both in terms of process and outcome in clinical inter-vention, little is known about its specific characteristics in short term dynamic psy-chotherapy (STDP). Accordingly, the main aim of the present work is to focus on the formal features of TA in a good outcome STDP. We applied the Collaborative Interaction Scale (Colli & Lingiardi, 2009) to verbatim transcripts in order to track macro and micro evolution of TA while considering the interplay of both therapist and patient contributions. Data were analyzed in terms of TA general trend, TA climate onset and high impact session TA characteristics. Results sustain the STDP theory of technique (Davanloo, 1990) concerning the general process, the onset fea-tures and patient therapist interplay from a TA perspective.

This paper describes changes in personality functioning according to Exner’s Rorschach Comprehensive System (CS) in an early adolescent boy, Gabriele, referred for anxiety and obsessive compulsive symptoms. The DSM-IV diagnosis was General Anxiety Disorder (GAD). The therapy lasted about 2 years, and sessions were all audio-taped to create a more objective database. A total of 50 sessions were analyzed. The therapist employed a broadly defined, object-relations-focused, psychodynamic framework, with particular emphasis placed on balancing supportive versus insight-oriented modes of therapy ( Skean, 2005 ). After a brief introduction of Gabriele’s clinical history and anamnesis, the paper illustrates (a) changes in the symptoms from the beginning to the end of the supportive psychodynamic psychotherapy, which also included some cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) interventions; (b) changes in the CS administered at the beginning and at the end of the psychotherapy; and (c) the relevance of therapeutic alliance measured by the Collaborative Interactive Scale (CIS; Colli & Lingiardi, 2007 ) as a fundamental intervening variable in the psychotherapy process.

The biopharmaceutical industry has traditionally been the key link between basic biomedical discovery and novel medicines. Today, the industry faces numerous challenges including the broad agreement that the current clinical trial system is inefficient and flawed. Most challenges are worsened by the inability of the stakeholders to work colla-boratively. Over the last decade, many cooperative efforts to transform clinical research have been launched, but a sys-temic solution has not been envisioned. A systems approach, including the application of systems engineering principles, has been used in other sectors and proposed for use in healthcare and medicines development. Clinical research, when looked at in systems terms, can be defined as an open system involving patients, investigators and associated staff, regulators, sponsors and stakeholders interconnected through a series of processes to bring effective and safe medicines into the market. ACRES is a global nonprofit organization with a mission of creating a multi-sector alliance of individuals and institutions collaborating on building a shared global system for clinical research excellence. A fundamental element of the ACRES system includes a global network of high-performing research sites interconnected through a shared information technology platform, with standardized policies and operational procedures and a robust, secure database to support performance, quality and safety. Five core initiatives address the larger mission and are currently ongoing. De-liverables will roll out over 2015–2018. Positive reception to the concept, vision and goals among critical stakeholders, and a steady influx of strategic allies willing to work collaboratively demonstrates the strong pull exerted by the vision of a global system. However, due to the undertakings’ scope and complexity, challenges remain. Recognition that effective shared collaboration is the best long-term option among stakeholders and the general public constitutes a powerful in-centive for ACRES contributors and strategic allies to keep working and make it happen.

The biopharmaceutical industry has traditionally been the key link between basic biomedical discovery and novel medicines. Today, the industry faces numerous challenges including the broad agreement that the current clinical trial system is inefficient and flawed. Most challenges are worsened by the inability of the stakeholders to work colla-boratively. Over the last decade, many cooperative efforts to transform clinical research have been launched, but a sys-temic solution has not been envisioned. A systems approach, including the application of systems engineering principles, has been used in other sectors and proposed for use in healthcare and medicines development. Clinical research, when looked at in systems terms, can be defined as an open system involving patients, investigators and associated staff, regulators, sponsors and stakeholders interconnected through a series of processes to bring effective and safe medicines into the market. ACRES is a global nonprofit organization with a mission of creating a multi-sector alliance of individuals and institutions collaborating on building a shared global system for clinical research excellence. A fundamental element of the ACRES system includes a global network of high-performing research sites interconnected through a shared information technology platform, with standardized policies and operational procedures and a robust, secure database to support performance, quality and safety. Five core initiatives address the larger mission and are currently ongoing. De-liverables will roll out over 2015–2018. Positive reception to the concept, vision and goals among critical stakeholders, and a steady influx of strategic allies willing to work collaboratively demonstrates the strong pull exerted by the vision of a global system. However, due to the undertakings’ scope and complexity, challenges remain. Recognition that effective shared collaboration is the best long-term option among stakeholders and the general public constitutes a powerful in-centive for ACRES contributors and strategic allies to keep working and make it happen.

<p>Uscito a pezzi dalla pesante crisi finanziaria e industriale del 1907, che aveva messo a nudo i limiti della struttura economica del Paese, il capitalismo industriale italiano elaborò un programma, portato avanti fino al primo dopoguerra, che prevedeva l’instaurazione di un governo di tecnocrati. Questo avrebbe dovuto trainare il Paese fuori dalla crisi, pianificarne l’economia e trasformarlo in una grande potenza industriale, con forti connotazioni imperialistiche. Segnali in tale direzione si erano registrati anche nei decenni precedenti, tra fine Ottocento e inizi Novecento, quando ebbe inizio un processo di concentrazione nel settore siderurgico e meccanico. Un percorso peraltro stimolato dalle commesse statali sempre più consistenti (Galli Della Loggia, 1970; Battilossi, 1999; Amatori e Colli, 1999; Bolchini, 2002). La crisi industriale e finanziaria del 1907 e la recessione a livello mondiale che ne seguì, accelerarono la soluzione tecnocratica, che prevedeva un’alleanza, più o meno stretta, con una parte della classe politica e l’entrata in guerra. Negli anni immediatamente seguenti il conflitto, il potere dei tecnocrati sulla scena politica italiana sembrò accrescersi notevolmente, soprattutto quando il governo progettò un programma di espansione economica nelle regioni del Caucaso, nei Balcani e nel Levante ex ottomano, territori in grado di fornire materie prime e di assorbire la produzione italiana in eccesso rispetto alle richieste di un mercato interno asfittico. La collaborazione tra mondo imprenditoriale, bancario e politico non produsse il risultato sperato. La caduta del governo Nitti e il ruolo destabilizzante e filotedesco della Banca Commerciale Italiana nell’Est europeo e nel Caucaso furono tra le cause principali che impedirono il decollo del progetto tecnocratico,<strong> </strong>provocando una dura reazione da parte dei fratelli Perrone alla guida del gruppo Ansaldo.</p><p>Heavily Weakened by the financial and industrial crisis of 1907, which showed all the limits of the economic structure of Italy, the Italian industrial capitalism developed a program that continued until the early after World War, which was taking into account the establishment of a government of technocrats.</p><p>This should had to take the country out of crisis, establish an economical plan and turn it into a major industrial power, with strong imperialist characteristics. Signals in this direction were also recorded in the previous decades, from the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, when a process of concentration of the main groups of entrepreneurs and capitalists began in the steel and mechanical industry. A path anyway enhanced by more and more orders from the government (Galli Della Loggia, 1970; Battilossi, 1999; Amatori and Colli, 1999; Boldrini, 2002). The industrial and financial crisis of 1907 and the global recession that followed, accelerated the technocratic solution, which were looking for a more or less closer alliance, with a part of the political class and going into war. Soon after the war, the political power of the technocrats in Italy seemed to grow significantly, especially when the Government developed a program of economic expansion in the regions of the Caucasus, Balkans and on the countries of the ex East Ottoman, these territories could provide raw materials and, with respect of an internal market completely saturated, to absorb the exceeding Italian production. The collaboration within the world of business, banking and politics did not produce the desired result. The fall of the Nitti´s Government and the pro German and destabilizing role of the Italian Commercial Bank in Eastern Europe and on the Caucasus were the major drivers against the launch of the technocratic project, inducing a though reaction by the Perrone brothers leading the group Ansaldo.</p>

Dans le cadre de ce memoire, une demarche scientifique d'etude de l'adherence polymere / metal et plus precisement de l'assemblage alliage d'aluminium / epoxyde / polyfluorure de vinylidene est proposee. Elle s'appuie sur une approche physico-chimique (mouillage, tof-sims, xps, infra rouge, sdl) par l'analyse des surfaces, des facies de rupture ainsi que par l'interpretation des liaisons se creant a l'interface et sur une approche mecanique (essai de cisaillement par double recouvrement, clivage). La comprehension des mecanismes d'adhesion est possible par une analyse fine des proprietes superficielles des materiaux de l'assemblage. Une importance est ainsi donnee a l'evolution des surfaces du metal et du polymere apres les differents traitements. En ce qui concerne le metal, il est montre que le traitement, un bain a base d'acide phosphorique, intervient sur l'evolution de la morphologie et sur la composition chimique de l'extreme surface. Apres traitement de l'alliage, la rupture se produisant a l'interface polymere : adhesif, la plus grande partie de l'etude a porte sur le traitement du polymere. Deux traitements ont ete consideres. L'attaque chimique commerciale tetra-etch, utilisee habituellement sur le teflon, se revele tres agressive mais se distingue par sa reproductibilite et sa stabilite. Cette etude a mis en evidence, la diminution du fluor, la formation d'insaturations, l'incorporation d'oxygene et le developpement des aspects cristallographiques. Un temps de traitement optimal de 15 minutes a ete determine. Par comparaison, le traitement physique de decharge couronne ne se traduit pas par une diminution du fluor et conduit a une surface souvent inho-mogene et non reproductible. L'adherence est traitee au moyen d'essais mecaniques. Deux geometries ont ete etudiees, le joint plat a double recouvrement permettant d'acceder a la force a la rupture, et le double cantilever s'interessant a la propagation de la fissure et faisant appel a la mecanique de la rupture. Differentes methodes d'interpretation du taux de restitution d'energie sont proposees. La premiere est experimentale et est basee sur la theorie des poutres minces. La deuxieme methode est analytique ; elle s'appuie sur la theorie des poutres minces et est amelioree par le modele de fondation. Enfin, la troisieme methode est numerique (elements finis) et est affinee par le modele de fondation. Ces essais d'adherence ou de mecanique de la rupture permettent aussi de determiner un temps de traitement optimal. Pour ce temps (15 minutes), les liaisons c = c et c n se creent entre le polymere et l'adhesif. Lors de cette etude, il a ete possible de correler les approches physico-chimiques des surfaces et interfaces avec l'approche mecanique.

Before and during the second session of the Council, American bishops took a collegial turn toward the revisioning of Catholic identity. In parallel with grass-roots commitments to the civil rights movement, the language of “human dignity, equality, mutual respect, the breaking down of social barriers” crossed over into religious speech patterns. Experiences of internationality as the bishops traveled back and forth to Rome and experiences of collegiality as they gathered in a voluntary meeting in Chicago furthered the acceptance of new pathways in Church and liturgy. Despite strong opposition from within their ranks and from the Roman curia, the leadership of Meyer, Dearden, Wright, Ritter, Shehan, and Hallinan, and the influence of the prominent theologians McManus, Diekmann, Ahern, and Coyle, led to an alliance with the Council’s majority favoring reform. An entrance into a new “politics of history” governed by participative processes, inculturation, lay ascendancy, and democratic discord developed.

This chapter discusses the role of the U.S. embassy in Santiago in the Chilean presidential election of 1964. One of the leading candidates in the race, Salvador Allende, was an avowed Marxist and the standard-bearer of the Popular Action Front (FRAP), a coalition of Socialists and Communists formed in 1958. Allende's main contender was Eduardo Frei Montalva, the undisputed leader of the Christian Democratic Party. For the United States, an Allende victory in the presidential election would entail a huge setback in the Western Hemisphere. Thus, the United States supported the candidacy of Eduardo Frei, whose project seemed an excellent alternative to the revolutionary path proposed by the Marxist Left and a good representation of the goals and values of the Alliance for Progress. The U.S. ambassador in Chile, Charles Cole, and more so the political staff of the embassy in Santiago, played an important role in shaping the race and advising the main chiefs of Eduardo Frei's political campaign, and even Frei himself, in the course of 1964. The mostly untold story of the U.S. embassy's involvement in the 1964 presidential race is an excellent example of the way in which U.S. foreign policy was carried out on the ground and, in many situations, in the open.