Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « AI Governance Framework »
Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres
Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « AI Governance Framework ».
À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.
Articles de revues sur le sujet "AI Governance Framework"
Miyamoto, Michiko. « Measuring AI Governance, AI Adoption and AI Strategy of Japanese Companies ». International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology 10, no 1 (11 octobre 2023) : 649–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.15379/ijmst.v10i1.2627.
Texte intégralPeckham, Jeremy B. « An AI Harms and Governance Framework for Trustworthy AI ». Computer 57, no 3 (mars 2024) : 59–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mc.2024.3354040.
Texte intégralRassolov, I. M., et S. G. Chubukova. « Artificial Intelligence and Effective Governance : Legal Framework ». Kutafin Law Review 9, no 2 (5 juillet 2022) : 309–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/2713-0525.2022.2.20.309-328.
Texte intégralGajjar, Vyoma. « AGENTIC GOVERNANCE : A FRAMEWORK FOR AUTONOMOUS DECISION-MAKING SYSTEMS ». International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology 09, no 04 (4 septembre 2024) : 73–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.33564/ijeast.2024.v09i04.008.
Texte intégralSentinella, Richard, Maël Schnegg et Klaus Möller. « A Management Control oriented Governance Framework for Artificial Intelligence ». Die Unternehmung 77, no 2 (2023) : 162–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/0042-059x-2023-2-162.
Texte intégralSentinella, Richard, Victoria Honsel et Mael Schnegg. « AI-Governance als strategisches Instrument ». Controlling 36, no 6 (2024) : 37–40. https://doi.org/10.15358/0935-0381-2024-6-37.
Texte intégralSistla, Swetha. « AI with Integrity : The Necessity of Responsible AI Governance ». Journal of Artificial Intelligence & ; Cloud Computing 3, no 5 (31 octobre 2024) : 1–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.47363/jaicc/2024(3)e180.
Texte intégralKolade, Titilayo Modupe, Nsidibe Taiwo Aideyan, Seun Michael Oyekunle, Olumide Samuel Ogungbemi, Dooshima Louisa Dapo-Oyewole et Oluwaseun Oladeji Olaniyi. « Artificial Intelligence and Information Governance : Strengthening Global Security, through Compliance Frameworks, and Data Security ». Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science 17, no 12 (4 décembre 2024) : 36–57. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrcos/2024/v17i12528.
Texte intégralWagner, Jennifer K., Megan Doerr et Cason D. Schmit. « AI Governance : A Challenge for Public Health ». JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 10 (30 septembre 2024) : e58358-e58358. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/58358.
Texte intégralAdebola Folorunso, Kehinde Olanipekun, Temitope Adewumi et Bunmi Samuel. « A policy framework on AI usage in developing countries and its impact ». Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances 21, no 1 (30 octobre 2024) : 154–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.30574/gjeta.2024.21.1.0192.
Texte intégralThèses sur le sujet "AI Governance Framework"
Haidar, Ahmad. « Responsible Artificial Intelligence : Designing Frameworks for Ethical, Sustainable, and Risk-Aware Practices ». Electronic Thesis or Diss., université Paris-Saclay, 2024. https://www.biblio.univ-evry.fr/theses/2024/interne/2024UPASI008.pdf.
Texte intégralArtificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming the world, redefining the relationship between technology and society. This thesis investigates the critical need for responsible and sustainable development, governance, and usage of AI and Generative AI (GAI). The study addresses the ethical risks, regulatory gaps, and challenges associated with AI systems while proposing actionable frameworks for fostering Responsible Artificial Intelligence (RAI) and Responsible Digital Innovation (RDI).The thesis begins with a comprehensive review of 27 global AI ethical declarations to identify dominant principles such as transparency, fairness, accountability, and sustainability. Despite their significance, these principles often lack the necessary tools for practical implementation. To address this gap, the second study in the research presents an integrative framework for RAI based on four dimensions: technical, AI for sustainability, legal, and responsible innovation management.The third part of the thesis focuses on RDI through a qualitative study of 18 interviews with managers from diverse sectors. Five key dimensions are identified: strategy, digital-specific challenges, organizational KPIs, end-user impact, and catalysts. These dimensions enable companies to adopt sustainable and responsible innovation practices while overcoming obstacles in implementation.The fourth study analyzes emerging risks from GAI, such as misinformation, disinformation, bias, privacy breaches, environmental concerns, and job displacement. Using a dataset of 858 incidents, this research employs binary logistic regression to examine the societal impact of these risks. The results highlight the urgent need for stronger regulatory frameworks, corporate digital responsibility, and ethical AI governance. Thus, this thesis provides critical contributions to the fields of RDI and RAI by evaluating ethical principles, proposing integrative frameworks, and identifying emerging risks. It emphasizes the importance of aligning AI governance with international standards to ensure that AI technologies serve humanity sustainably and equitably
Rusu, Anca. « Delving into AI discourse within EU institutional communications : empowering informed decision-making for tomorrow’s tech by fostering responsible communication for emerging technologies ». Electronic Thesis or Diss., Université Paris sciences et lettres, 2023. https://basepub.dauphine.fr/discover?query=%222023UPSLD029%22.
Texte intégralThe proliferation of emerging technologies, which are defined as new technologies or new use of old technologies (for example, artificial intelligence (AI)), presents both opportunities and challenges for society when used. These technologies promise to revolutionize various sectors, providing new efficiencies, capabilities, and insights, which makes them interesting to develop and use. However, their use also raises significant ethical, environmental, and social concerns. Organizations communicate through various modes, one of which is written discourse. Such discourse encompasses not only the structure of the message but also its content. In other words, the vocabulary (the structure) is used to express a specific point of view (the content). Within technology usage, there is a clear connection between communication and informed decision-making, as the information about the technology (its form and substance) is spread through communication, which in turn aids in making well-informed decisions. This thesis adopts a risk governance approach, which involves taking a preventive perspective to minimize (or avoid) future potential risks. This viewpoint acknowledges the importance of people making informed decisions about accepting or acting in light of potential future risks. It is to be noted that people's decisions are influenced by what they know about a technology and their perceptions (what they do not know but believe). Hence, our research aims to explore the theoretical perspectives on organizations' communication responsibilities and the actual practices employed by these entities. This choice stems from the apparent gap in the literature concerning responsible communication and the necessity to examine the topic, emphasizing practical considerations for further defining modes of organizational communication to analyze and take proactive action when communicating about emerging technologies such as AI. When an organization communicates about an emerging technology, elements focusing on the responsibility of sharing information can be found in the literature, but none on the responsibility (seen as an ethical behavior) of one organization regarding the impact of what is communicated on the decision-making process. Some responsibility is linked to corporate social responsibility (CSR), but the focus remains on the information. We propose a concept that addresses the intersection between three considered fields: emerging technologies, organizational communication and risk governance, which is the one of Responsible Organizational Communication on Emerging Technologies (ROCET) to address the responsibility of what is communicated as an ethical behavior. We aim to delve into the concept by bridging the divide between theory and practice, examining both simultaneously to garner a comprehensive understanding. This approach will help construct an understanding that meets halfway, building on knowledge accumulated from both areas. Therefore, two analyses will be conducted in parallel: a critical literature review around the “responsible communication” concept and a discourse analysis of standalone reports published by governmental bodies regarding the use of a specific emerging technology, namely artificial intelligence (AI). Using a single case analysis approach, the analysis aims to problematize one's communication regarding a public discourse while challenging such constitutions by exploring models of responsible communication. There is a gap in the literature in referring to this term as this research does. The literature focuses either on the communication conducted by organizations as part of their corporate responsibility strategy or from a communication theory perspective, concentrating on how to convey a message effectively. Alternatively, it looks at the matter from the emerging technologies perspective, where the focus is on information communication referring to the technology
Livres sur le sujet "AI Governance Framework"
Taddeo, Mariarosaria. The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Defence. Oxford University Press, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197745441.001.0001.
Texte intégralPagallo, Ugo. New Laws of Outer Space. Hart Publishing, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781509976218.
Texte intégralBAHADUR TIWARI, BHUPENDRA, E. ESWARA REDDY et SAM X. KINGSLEY JOSHUA. INNOVATIVE HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICES AND EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO IT SECTOR. Jupiter Publications Consortium, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.47715/jpc.b.978-93-91303-79-2.
Texte intégralChapitres de livres sur le sujet "AI Governance Framework"
Choung, Hyesun, Prabu David et John S. Seberger. « A Multilevel Framework for AI Governance ». Dans The Routledge Handbook of Global and Digital Governance Crossroads, 310–23. London : Routledge India, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003316077-25.
Texte intégralHawkins, William. « Guardians of Intelligence : Building a Robust AI Governance Framework ». Dans AI Essentials Guide, 111–32. Berkeley, CA : Apress, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/979-8-8688-0911-8_7.
Texte intégralPery, Andrew, Majid Rafiei, Michael Simon et Wil M. P. van der Aalst. « Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence and Process Mining : Challenges and Opportunities ». Dans Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 395–407. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98581-3_29.
Texte intégralHusain, Coovadia, Marx Benjamin et Ilse Botha. « Identifying AI Corporate Governance Principles That Should Be Prevalent in a Governance Framework for Business ». Dans Towards Digitally Transforming Accounting and Business Processes, 265–83. Cham : Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46177-4_15.
Texte intégralLei, Yuxiao, Yucong Duan et Mengmeng Song. « Technical Implementation Framework of AI Governance Policies for Cross-Modal Privacy Protection ». Dans Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, 431–43. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67540-0_27.
Texte intégralNikolinakos, Nikos Th. « Reforming the EU Civil Liability Framework Applicable to Artificial Intelligence and Other Emerging Digital Technologies : The Proposed AI Liability Directive ». Dans Law, Governance and Technology Series, 377–475. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67969-8_8.
Texte intégralMisuraca, Gianluca, et Gianluigi Viscusi. « AI-Enabled Innovation in the Public Sector : A Framework for Digital Governance and Resilience ». Dans Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 110–20. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_9.
Texte intégralLee, Michelle Seng Ah, Luciano Floridi et Alexander Denev. « Innovating with Confidence : Embedding AI Governance and Fairness in a Financial Services Risk Management Framework ». Dans Philosophical Studies Series, 353–71. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81907-1_20.
Texte intégralKritikos, Mihalis. « Artificial Intelligence (AI) in a Time of Pandemics : Developing Options for the Ethical Governance of COVID-19 AI Applications ». Dans Research Ethics Forum, 165–74. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15746-2_13.
Texte intégralNesi, Paolo. « Valutazione della propensione alla mediazione tramite eXplainable AI ». Dans Giustizia sostenibile, 183–212. Florence : Firenze University Press, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.36253/979-12-215-0316-6.13.
Texte intégralActes de conférences sur le sujet "AI Governance Framework"
Teguh, Andy, Joko Slamet, Hartono Saputro, Kelly Sungkono et Riyanarto Sarno. « Optimizing IT Governance and Project Management in Software Development through AI Integration and COBIT 2019 Framework ». Dans 2024 2nd International Conference on Technology Innovation and Its Applications (ICTIIA), 1–6. IEEE, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/ictiia61827.2024.10761914.
Texte intégralSidorova, Anna, et Kashif Saeed. « Incorporating Stakeholder enfranchisement, Risks, Gains, and AI decisions in AI Governance Framework ». Dans Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2022.722.
Texte intégralRajagopal, Manikandan, Ramkumar Sivasakthivel, Gobinath Ramar, Mansurali A et Sathesh Kumar Karuppasamy. « A Conceptual Framework for AI Governance in Public Administration – A Smart Governance Perspective ». Dans 2023 7th International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC). IEEE, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/i-smac58438.2023.10290366.
Texte intégralFares, Nadine Y., Denis Nedeljkovic et Manar Jammal. « AI-enabled IoT Applications : Towards a Transparent Governance Framework ». Dans 2023 IEEE Global Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things (GCAIoT). IEEE, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/gcaiot61060.2023.10385106.
Texte intégralAlzeqri, Aziz. « Artificial Intelligence in Non-Clinical Functions : A Strategic Framework for Healthcare Organizations ». Dans The Integration of AI and Technology in Modern Business Practices, 52–60. SBS Swiss Business School, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.70301/conf.sbs-jabr.2024.1/1.4.
Texte intégralCorreia, Anacleto, et Pedro B. Água. « Enhancing corporate governance : A conceptual approach to artificial intelligence usage ». Dans New outlooks for the scholarly research in corporate governance. Virtus Interpress, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/nosrcgp23.
Texte intégralMikhail, Bundin, Martynov Aleksei et Shireeva Ekaterina. « On the Way to Legal Framework for AI in Public Sector ». Dans ICEGOV '18 : 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. New York, NY, USA : ACM, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3209415.3209448.
Texte intégralOrtega, Eduardo, Michelle Tran et Grace Bandeen. « AI Digital Tool Product Lifecycle Governance Framework through Ethics and Compliance by Design† ». Dans 2023 IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI). IEEE, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cai54212.2023.00155.
Texte intégralHoyas, Sergio. « ASDG — An AI-based framework for automatic classification of impact on the SDGs ». Dans ICEGOV 2022 : 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. New York, NY, USA : ACM, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3560107.3560128.
Texte intégralAli, Umar, et Cenk Calis. « Centralized Smart Governance Framework Based on IoT Smart City Using TTG-Classified Technique ». Dans 2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Smart Cities : Improving Quality of Life Using ICT & IoT and AI (HONET-ICT). IEEE, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/honet.2019.8908070.
Texte intégralRapports d'organisations sur le sujet "AI Governance Framework"
Aiken, Catherine. Classifying AI Systems. Center for Security and Emerging Technology, novembre 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.51593/20200025.
Texte intégralHulin, Anne-Sophie, Anita Burgun, Stéphanie Combes, Nathalie De Grove-Valdeyron, Caroline Guillot, Jacques Priol, Jeanne Solofrizzo et Grimaud Valat. Between Data Governance and Artificial Intelligence : What Place for the Pursuit of the General Interest ? : Proceedings of the Closing Conference of the Chair for Social Justice and AI. Observatoire international sur les impacts sociétaux de l'intelligence artificielle et du numérique, août 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.61737/neag1390.
Texte intégralAtabey, Ayça, Cory Robinson, Anna Lindroos Cermakova, Andra Siibak et Natalia Ingebretsen Kucirkova. Ethics in EdTech : Consolidating Standards For Responsible Data Handling And Usercentric Design. University in Stavanger, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.31265/usps.283.
Texte intégral