Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « Administrative procedure – European Union countries »
Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres
Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « Administrative procedure – European Union countries ».
À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.
Articles de revues sur le sujet "Administrative procedure – European Union countries"
Kovbas, Igor, et Pavlo Krainii. « Administrative Procedure under the Legislation of Ukraine and Certain Foreign Countries (Comparative Legal Study) ». Problems of legality, no 163 (28 décembre 2023) : 93–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.163.292358.
Texte intégralDavinić, Marko, et Vuk Cucić. « Europeanization of General Administrative Procedure in Serbia ». Review of Central and East European Law 46, no 2 (27 mai 2021) : 153–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15730352-bja10045.
Texte intégralKrausenboeck, Maria. « DER RENEUAL MODEL DRAFT FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE LAW – BACKGROUNDS AND CURRENT SITUATION ». Administrative law and process, no 3(26) (2019) : 72–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2019.3.04.
Texte intégralKHRIDOCHKIN, Andriy. « Features of legal support of public administration procedures in the field of intellectual property in the countries of the European Union ». Scientific Bulletin of Flight Academy. Section : Economics, Management and Law 6 (2022) : 131–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.33251/2707-8620-2022-6-131-137.
Texte intégralArana García, Estanislao. « ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION : TOWARDS A COMMON MODEL OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE ». Administrative law and process, no 2(25) (2019) : 87–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2019.2.06.
Texte intégralGembara, G. « Simplified forms of trial proceeding of administrative cases in the legislation of European countries ». Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series : Law 2, no 78 (31 août 2023) : 17–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2023.78.2.2.
Texte intégralTKACHOVA, Viktoriia, et Pavlo LAVRYK. « Law of Ukraine “On administrative procedure”. First critical comments ». Economics. Finances. Law 6/1, no - (29 juin 2022) : 28–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.37634/efp.2022.6(1).6.
Texte intégralMahmutefendic, Tahir. « The Eu Enlargement. How to be Like the Irish and not the Greek ? » ECONOMICS 7, no 2 (1 décembre 2019) : 49–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2019-0021.
Texte intégralKlymenko, Ihor Volodymyrovych, Dmytro Volodymyrovych Shvets, Oleh Tsyhanov et Liudmyla Hennadiivna Mohilevska. « Services Provided by Public Authorities : Features of Legal Regulation in Ukraine and the European Union ». Revista Amazonia Investiga 9, no 31 (7 août 2020) : 44–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.34069/ai/2020.31.07.4.
Texte intégralJeretina, Urša. « Administrative Aspects of Alternative Consumer Dispute Resolution in the European Union (EU), Slovenia and Croatia ». NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 9, no 1 (1 juin 2016) : 191–222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2016-0009.
Texte intégralThèses sur le sujet "Administrative procedure – European Union countries"
COURELL, Ann Marie. « The friendly settlement procedure under the European convention on human rights ». Doctoral thesis, European University Institute, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/7026.
Texte intégralExamining Board: Prof. Philip Alston (European University Institute) ; Prof. Francesco Francioni (European University Institute) ; Prof. Olivier de Schutter (University of Louvain) ; Prof. Kevin Boyle (University of Essex Colchester)
PDF of thesis uploaded from the Library digital archive of EUI PhD theses
Demeester, Loïc. « Les relations entre le public et l'Administration : comparaison France, Espagne, Union européenne ». Electronic Thesis or Diss., Toulouse 1, 2021. http://www.theses.fr/2021TOU10032.
Texte intégralThe effects of European integration on national rights have generated extensive scholarly literature. However, the relationships between the citizens and the public administration appear to be still barely addressed in studies considering the interactions between the European system and the national systems. The research presented here aims therefore to analyze the impact of EU integration on the relationships between the citizens and the public administration through a comparison of the French, Spanish and European systems. This dissertation argues for the existence of a European convergence in these relationships. The comparative analysis indeed reveals that there is a complex interplay of reciprocal influences in the systems studied which results in the development of closer relationships between the citizens and the public administration. First, the very existence of a convergence makes it necessary to reconsider the notions that are used to describe these relationships, notably the notion of administrative procedure. Within a contemporary perspective, such a procedure is to be regarded as a set of information exchanges taking place between the citizens and the public administration. These exchanges are more and more regulated and codified so as to give stronger legitimacy to administrative decisions. Secondly, the observed convergence brings to light two types of relationships. In the procedure by which an individual administrative act is issued, the exchange of information serves to protect the citizen, according to a model derived from court proceedings. In addition to these traditional procedures, innovative procedures have been developing and the exchange of information has been repurposed. Within these procedures, it creates an administrative dialogue that supports the relevance and acceptability of the decision taken. This cooperative model of relationships primarily contributes to administrative efficiency
Xu, Zi Wei. « Legal standing of private parties within judicial reviews in the European Community : the missing piece in a complete system of remedies ? » Thesis, University of Macau, 2009. http://umaclib3.umac.mo/record=b2099272.
Texte intégralБулатін, Д. О., D. O. Bulatin et ORCID : https://orcid org/0000-0002-0200-2822. « Адміністративно-правові засади здійснення превентивної діяльності поліцією : порівняння досвіду України та країн ЄС : дисертація ». Thesis, Харків, 2020. https://youtu.be/9NaUFk_HSLA.
Texte intégralУ дисертації міститься теоретичне узагальнення актуальної наукової проблеми, пов’язаної із визначенням адміністративно-правових засад здійснення превентивної діяльності поліцією через порівняння досвіду України та країн ЄС, а також шляхів їх удосконалення. В результаті проведеного дослідження сформульовано низку положень та висновків котрі спрямовані на досягнення поставленої мети.
The dissertation contains a theoretical generalization of the current scientific problem related to the definition of administrative and legal principles of preventive activities by the police through a comparison of the experience of Ukraine and the EU, as well as ways to improve them. As a result of the research, a number of provisions and conclusions have been formulated which are aimed at achieving the set goal.
В диссертации содержится теоретическое обобщение актуальной научной проблемы, связанной с определением административно-правовых основ осуществления превентивной деятельности полицией через сравнение опыта Украины и стран ЕС, а также путей их совершенствования. В результате проведенного исследования сформулирован ряд положений и выводов которые направлены на достижение поставленной цели.
García-Perrote, Forn Ma Elena. « Proceso penal y juicios paralelos ». Doctoral thesis, Universitat de Barcelona, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/386469.
Texte intégralEl principi de publicitat de les actuacions judicials es troba consagrat com un dret fonamental en l’article 24.2 de la nostra Constitució. Aquest dret no és de caràcter absolut i està sotmès a determinades limitacions previstes legalment. La publicitat del procés penal implica que tinguin coneixement de les actuacions, no només els propis interessats, si no també estranys al procés. Aquesta activitat de difusió de la notícia, garantia del funcionament del Poder Judicial en una societat democràtica, és realitzada, principalment, pels mitjans de comunicació. El problema es produeix quan s’informa d’un fet que és notícia i que es troba sub iudice, i els mass media, mitjançant un “judici paral·lel”, pretenen de forma continuada i esbiaixada examinar i valorar el procés judicial, les proves i les persones implicades en els fets, assumint el paper de jutge, induint a un veredicte anticipat de culpabilitat o innocència a aquest en front de l’opinió pública. Aquesta activitat topa amb posicions subjectives dels individus que també tenen la consideració de drets fonamentals com són els drets a: (i) un procés just; (ii) un jutge imparcial; (iii) la presumpció d’innocència i (iv) rebre i comunicar informació. Amb la present tesis doctoral s’ha procedit a estudiar la referida problemàtica així com les respostes que la legislació, la jurisprudència i la doctrina donen en el nostre Ordenament Jurídic i en dret comparat, per tal de conciliar aquests drets fonamentals amb els interessos mediàtics de la premsa, així com les garanties previstes legalment en l’àmbit penal, civil i contenciós – administratiu per a la salvaguarda dels mateixos. En la part final del treball s’apunten possibles solucions al problema dels “judicis paral·lels” que poden donar resposta a l’interès general de la societat en la seva pretensió d’obtenir una justícia eficaç en la repressió del delicte a la vegada que respectuosa amb els drets de tots els ciutadans que es puguin veure involucrats en el procés judicial.
The principle of publicity of judicial actions is set forth as fundamental right in article 24 of the Spanish Constitution. Nevertheless, this is not an absolute right: it has some legal limitations. The publicity of the criminal procedure implies that not only those directly affected by the procedure know the state of acts but third people. Information disclosure, which serves as a warranty of the functioning of the judicial system, is done in a democratic society by the media. The problem arises when mass media start a parallel trial while reporting on case which is still sub iudice, assessing and judging with a biased viewpoint the procedure, its participants and the evidences submitted, assuming the judge’s role and, therefore, trying to induce him/her to an anticipate judgement before the public opinion. Such activity collides with the position of the defendant, who has his/her own fundamental rights such as the right to (i) a fair trial; (ii) an impartial judge; (iii) the presumption of innocence and (iv) receive and communicate certain information. In the present thesis, the problem of parallel trials and the collision of rights have been studied taking into account the solutions provided by Law, case law and scholars both of Spanish Legal System and comparative Law in order to reconcile such fundamental rights with media’s interest and also the legal guarantees for defendants in civil, criminal and administrative procedures. In the final part of this thesis, there are some possible solutions to the problem of parallel trials which try to give an answer to society’s general interest to find an efficient justice system in punishing crimes which also respects the rights of all citizens which may be part of the process.
BRITO, BASTOS Filipe. « Beyond executive federalism : the judicial crafting of the law of composite administrative decision-making ». Doctoral thesis, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/55824.
Texte intégralExamining Board: Professor Deirdre Curtin, European University Institute (Supervisor) ; Professor Miguel Poiares Maduro, European University Institute ; Professor Paul Craig, St. John's College, Oxford ; Professor Herwig Hofmann, University of Luxembourg
The thesis examines how EU courts have addressed the rule of law challenges of composite procedures. Composite procedures are pervasive administrative processes which involve joint decision-making by national and EU authorities. Such procedures fit poorly into the EU’s traditional model of administrative law, EU executive federalism, which is designed for an administrative system where decisional power is exercised separately by the two levels of administration. This mismatch would make it difficult to observe several key requirements of the rule of law in EU administrative law – such as the right to be heard, the right to a reasoned decision, judicial protection, and the control of legality. The thesis argues that EU courts have crafted a series of unprecedented implicit principles that specifically aim at ensuring the observance of rule of law requirements in composite decision-making. In doing so, EU case law has departed from the old doctrine of EU executive federalism. This was however not an easy transition. Indeed, since the EU’s foundational period, EU executive federalism was considered to be a constitutional doctrine, i.e., to immediately flow from the Treaties. Given the almost complete lack of references to administrative issues in the Treaties, this reading was entirely question-begging. Its espousal in the case law is explained in the dissertation as the likely result of a shared federalist conception of the European Union and of the administrative order created under its aegis. The thesis further argues that, just as the doctrine of EU executive federalism, the judge-made law of composite procedures relies on a series of assumptions on the relations between national and EU administration. The principles of composite decision-making do not treat national and EU authorities as two strictly separate spheres of power. Rather, they handle the two levels as a single, integrated administration, where national authorities are treated as an extension of the Commission – as the EU administration’s ancillary bureaucracy.
DELLA, CANANEA Giacinto. « I procedimenti amministrativi della Comunita Europea ». Doctoral thesis, 1994. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/4610.
Texte intégralHÜTTEMANN, Suzan Denise. « Principles and perspectives of European criminal procedure ». Doctoral thesis, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/24001.
Texte intégralFirst made available online on 29 July 2019
Examining Board: Professor Neil Walker, EUI / University of Edinburgh (Supervisor); Professor Marise Cremona, EUI; Professor Valsamis Mitsilegas, Queen Mary, University of London; Professor Kimmo Nuotio, University of Helsinki.
This thesis shall contribute to European Criminal Procedure, a rapidly evolving area of EU policy that has attracted much attention, but has also been subject to criticism. The research will first identify and analyse the main rationales of this area. Since the Tampere European Council of 1999, mutual recognition has become the most fundamental concept of judicial cooperation in criminal matters and has experienced a steep career, having been adopted by Art. 82 TFEU. When the principle of mutual recognition was introduced, it was based on an analogy to the free movement of goods. This analogy has often been regarded as flawed. Moreover, there has always been a notion of mutual recognition in judicial cooperation as well. The study will show how these two factors have influenced the development of the area, and how policy concepts, such as the principle of mutual trust, have had a greater influence on the development of the law than any legal doctrine. The lack of a coherent approach to the area of judicial cooperation and the unsystematic combination of different legal orders have caused unforeseen frictions for the individual. These will be illustrated by an analysis of the law of transnational evidence-gathering according to the European Evidence Warrant and the proposed European Investigation Order. It will be shown that most of the problems result from the lack of a uniform allocation of jurisdiction and from an overly confined understanding of fundamental rights in the context of judicial cooperation. By analysing the nature and purpose of jurisdictional rules in a national and a European context, the thesis aims at uncovering the theoretic foundations on which a uniform allocation of jurisdiction could be built. Finally, the thesis analyses the role of fundamental rights in judicial cooperation. It will uncover the ineptness of a nation-state oriented interpretation of fundamental rights to adequately address the problems of mutual recognition and argue for a European understanding of transnational judicial rights.
NEHL, Hanns Peter. « Procedural principles of good administration in Community law ». Doctoral thesis, 1997. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/5668.
Texte intégralSupervisor: R. Dehousse
First made available online: 14 June 2017
In current debates turning on the fundamental values which the legal order of the European Community should be committed to respect and protect legal issues relating to administrative process and, in particular, the adequate degree of procedural protection to be accorded to individuals have increasingly come to the forefront. This paper seeks to contribute to the discussion by trying to demonstrate that and why the significance ascribed to the law governing Community administrative procedures has indeed gone through a deep metamorphosis during the last decade which arguably has not yet come to an end. In fact, in the face of the recent case-law of the Community courts, which will be analyzed, it seems not too daring to speak of an ongoing process of 'constitutionalization' with respect to procedural requirements. In the context of this broader development, an attempt will be made to reveal some of its exemplary features, namely, the dynamic expansion of a specified set of procedural standards of good administration. It will be argued that process standards, such as the right to access to information or the right to be heard, tend to be extensively interpreted in particular instances as well as to gradually gain universal applicability in the vast field of what has come to be named 'Community' or 'European administrative law'. However, the marked trend towards constitutionalizing process principles, which is primarily being supported by judicial intervention, is understandable only with a view to the extraordinarily heterogeneous nature of the Community administrative 'system' referred to; its 'structure' therefore calls for some further elucidation.
CHITI, Edoardo. « Le agenzie europee ». Doctoral thesis, 2000. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/4598.
Texte intégralLivres sur le sujet "Administrative procedure – European Union countries"
Harlow, Carol. Process and procedure in EU administration. Oxford : Hart Publishing, 2014.
Trouver le texte intégralKiekebeld, Ben J. Harmful tax competition in the European Union : Code of conduct,countermeasures and EU law. The Hague, The Netherlands : Kluwer, 2004.
Trouver le texte intégralLasok, K. P. E. Judicial control in the EU : Procedures and principles. Richmond : Richmond Law & Tax, 2004.
Trouver le texte intégralA, Bermann George, Koch Charles H, O'Reilly James T. 1947- et American Bar Association. Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice., dir. Administrative law of the European Union. Chicago, Ill : ABA, Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice, 2008.
Trouver le texte intégralChiti, Edoardo, et Bernardo Giorgio Mattarella. Global administrative law and EU administrative law : Relationships, legal issues and comparison. Heidelberg : Springer, 2011.
Trouver le texte intégralGraver, Hans Petter. Forvaltningsrett i markedsstaten : Studier i europeisering av forvaltningsretten. Bergen : Fagbokforlaget, 2002.
Trouver le texte intégralAiroldi, Mario. La tutela dinanzi alla giurisdizione amministrativa europea. Torino : G. Giappichelli, 1999.
Trouver le texte intégralNazzini, Renato. Concurrent proceedings in competition law : Procedure, evidence and remedies. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2004.
Trouver le texte intégralTom, Zwart, et Verhey Luc, dir. Agencies in European and comparative perspective. Antwerp, Belgium : Intersentia, 2003.
Trouver le texte intégralChiti, Edoardo, et Bernardo Giorgio Mattarella. Global administrative law and EU administrative law : Relationships, legal issues and comparison. Heidelberg : Springer, 2011.
Trouver le texte intégralChapitres de livres sur le sujet "Administrative procedure – European Union countries"
Tepandi, Jaak, Carmen Rotuna, Giovanni Paolo Sellitto, Sander Fieten et Andriana Prentza. « The Technical Challenges in OOP Application Across the European Union and the TOOP OOP Architecture ». Dans The Once-Only Principle, 141–63. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79851-2_8.
Texte intégralBeger, Paula. « Party Rhetoric and Action Compared : Examining Politicisation and Compliance in the Field of Asylum and Migration Policy in the Czech Republic and Hungary ». Dans Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics, 137–56. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54674-8_6.
Texte intégralVolpato, Annalisa. « Novel Foods in the EU Integrated Administrative Space : An Institutional Perspective ». Dans Novel Foods and Edible Insects in the European Union, 15–36. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13494-4_2.
Texte intégralÖberg, Marja-Liisa. « The Boundaries of the Internal Market In- and Outside the EU ». Dans The Borders of the European Union in a Conflictual World, 73–92. Cham : Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54200-8_4.
Texte intégralWollmann, Hellmut. « Transformation of Public Administration in East Germany Following Unification ». Dans Public Administration in Germany, 253–69. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53697-8_15.
Texte intégralSzulecki, Kacper, Marta Bivand Erdal et Ben Stanley. « Emigration and Transnational Political Practices in Central and Eastern Europe After EU Enlargement 2004–2007 ». Dans External Voting, 21–36. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19246-3_2.
Texte intégralBrown, L. Neville, John S. Bell et Jean-Michel Galabert. « The Influence of droit administratif Outside France ». Dans French Administrative Law, 268–87. Oxford University PressOxford, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198765134.003.0010.
Texte intégralAndenas, Mads. « EU Countries and the UK ». Dans Judicial Review of Administration in Europe, 295–306. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198867609.003.0018.
Texte intégralThym, Daniel. « Visa Policy ». Dans European Migration Law, 280—C11P63. Oxford University PressOxford, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192894274.003.0012.
Texte intégralKrysztofiak, Agnieszka, et Dariusz Strugliński. « Procedura celna 42 a oszustwa w zakresie VAT ». Dans Prawo i ryzyko celne, 85–109. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.18559/978-83-8211-233-7/6.
Texte intégralActes de conférences sur le sujet "Administrative procedure – European Union countries"
Chuyenko, Valentina, et Oleksandra Chuyenko. « Legal Regulation of the Status of Ukrainian Refugees in the European Union : Prospective Directions Concerning Reform ». Dans Human Capital, Institutions, Economic Growth. Kutaisi University, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.52244/c.2023.11.10.
Texte intégralSilvestru, Ramona camelia, Lavinia Nemes et Catalin ionut Silvestru. « CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN KNOWLEDGE SHARING IN E-LEARNING PROGRAMS FOR PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ». Dans eLSE 2014. Editura Universitatii Nationale de Aparare "Carol I", 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.12753/2066-026x-14-212.
Texte intégralVukašinović Radojičić, Zorica, et Dejan Vučetić. « THE EUROPEAN PRINCIPLES OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION SERVICES DELIVERY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF DIGITALIZATION AND SIMPLIFICATION : NORMATIVE FRAMEWORK AND PRACTISE IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA ». Dans International Scientific Conference “Digitalization and Green Transformation of the EU“. Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.25234/eclic/27449.
Texte intégralSalih, Ali, et Farouq Al Azzam. « Risks and negative consequences of the digital transformation of society : the experience of the countries of the European Union ». Dans المؤتمر الدولي الرابع في الأطر القانونية والسياسية للحكومة الرشيدة. Cihan University-Erbil, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.24086/lir2023/paper.1018.
Texte intégralMoroz, Oleg. « Justification of public administration reform in Ukraine on the way of European integration after the end of the war ». Dans The 5th Economic International Conference “Competitiveness and sustainable development“. Technical University of Moldova, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.52326/csd2023.03.
Texte intégralBeutel, Jochen, Edmunds Broks, Arnis Buka et Christoph Schewe. « Setting Aside National Rules that Conflict EU law : How Simmenthal Works in Germany and in Latvia ? » Dans The 8th International Scientific Conference of the Faculty of Law of the University of Latvia. University of Latvia Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.22364/iscflul.8.2.10.
Texte intégralDauster, Manfred. « Criminal Proceedings in Times of Pandemic ». Dans The 8th International Scientific Conference of the Faculty of Law of the University of Latvia. University of Latvia Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.22364/iscflul.8.2.18.
Texte intégralZAWOJSKA, Aldona. « THE PROS AND CONS OF THE EU COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY ». Dans RURAL DEVELOPMENT. Aleksandras Stulginskis University, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.15544/rd.2017.158.
Texte intégralSchaaf, Manfred, et Friedrich Schoeckle. « Technical Approach for the Reduction of Fugitive Emissions ». Dans ASME 2009 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. ASMEDC, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/pvp2009-78125.
Texte intégralFelcan, Miroslav. « Historical Cross-Section of Arson ». Dans Safe and Secure Society. The College of European and Regional Studies, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.36682/ssc_2020/1.
Texte intégralRapports d'organisations sur le sujet "Administrative procedure – European Union countries"
Bourrier, Mathilde, Michael Deml et Farnaz Mahdavian. Comparative report of the COVID-19 Pandemic Responses in Norway, Sweden, Germany, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. University of Stavanger, novembre 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.31265/usps.254.
Texte intégral