Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « Administrative Decisions Tribunal »
Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres
Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « Administrative Decisions Tribunal ».
À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.
Articles de revues sur le sujet "Administrative Decisions Tribunal"
1
Ferreira, Lydia Stewart. « PROCESS MATTERS - EMPIRICALLY EVALUATING ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS IN THE HEALTH SECTOR : THE QUESTIONABLE NEUTRALITY OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PROCESS ». Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 32, no 1 (1 février 2015) : 217. http://dx.doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4521.
Texte intégralRésumé :
The health tribunal process is assumed to be neutral and allow for the tribunal’s focus to be on the parties’ legal arguments. This study quantitatively examined approximately 400 decisions over a five-year period to determine whether or not health tribunal hearings are neutral or whether the hearing process itself affects the tribunal’s decision independent of the parties’ legal arguments. Certain tribunal procedures affected tribunal decisions independent of legal arguments. This novel quantitative research matrix, which analysed cases over a five year time period, identified trends which are overlooked in traditional legal analysis of judicial review. Il est présumé que le processus d’audience du tribunal de la santé est neutre et permet au tribunal de se concentrer sur les arguments juridiques des parties. Cette étude porte sur l’analyse quantitative d’environ 400 décisions et s’est étendue sur une période de cinq années; elle visait à déterminer si les audiences du tribunal de la santé sont neutres ou non, ou si le processus d’audience même influence les décisions du tribunal indépendamment des arguments juridiques des parties. Cette nouvelle matrice de données quantitatives, qui a analysé des causes sur une période de cinq années, a permis de constater des tendances qui sont mises de côté dans les analyses juridiques traditionnelles du processus de contrôle judiciaire.
2
Hansen, Peter C. « The World Bank Administrative Tribunal’s External Sources of Law : The Next Chapter (2006–2010) (Part II) ». Law & ; Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 11, no 3 (2012) : 449–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341236.
Texte intégralRésumé :
Abstract The World Bank Administrative Tribunal has begun its second quarter-century with a jurisprudential flowering of extraordinary proportions. Mr. Hansen’s study, which builds on his earlier 25-year retrospective, comprehensively surveys the Tribunal’s numerous doctrinal developments during this time. In this article, which is part two of two, Mr. Hansen revisits two of the four subjects explored in his retrospective: (i) the role of general legal principles as a source of Tribunal law, particularly with respect to the Tribunal’s recent and extensive due process jurisprudence; and (ii) the role of external case law as a source of Tribunal law, including decisions from international courts, international administrative tribunals, international arbitral tribunals and national courts. Extensively footnoted, Mr. Hansen’s study is intended for both academics and practitioners specializing in international administrative law and comparative international jurisprudence.
3
Lewis, Clive. « The Exhaustion of Alternative Remedies in Administrative Law ». Cambridge Law Journal 51, no 1 (mars 1992) : 138–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0008197300016792.
Texte intégralRésumé :
The application for judicial review is the primary means of challenging the legality of action taken by public bodies. Judicial review is not, however, the only avenue by which an individual may challenge a particular decision. Statute may create an appellate machinery to hear appeals against decisions of public bodies. There is a wide variety in the pattern of such schemes. There may be an appeal from a decision to a tribunal or other body, with a further right of appeal on a point of law or by way of case stated to the High Court or the Court of Appeal. Such mechanisms exist in a number of fields, most importantly in the field of revenue law, enforcement notices in planning law, decisions of inferior courts such as magistrates& courts, and social security law. There may be an appeal from a decision to an administrative tribunal or inferior court but with no right of appeal to the High Court, as in certain immigration cases where decisions may be appealed to an adjudicator and from him to the Immigration Appeal Tribunal. There may be an appeal from decisions to an administrative body such as a Secretary of State either with provision for appeal to the courts, as with appeals against refusals of planning permission by local authorities, or without any further right of appeal, as in the case of appeals against disciplinary decisions of chief constables.
4
Kilian, Neels. « The Question is "Should Insurers Continuously Update Policyholder Records" ? Insurance Law Requires the Principles of Administrative Law to Settle Disputes between the Policyholder and the Insurer ». Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 22 (25 octobre 2019) : 1–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a6386.
Texte intégralRésumé :
It is possible to argue that the Financial Advisory Intermediary Services Ombud (hereafter FAIS Ombud) has jurisdiction to consider insurer's decisions not to update their internal administrative systems. The FAIS Ombud may therefore investigate such matters as a complaint as defined in section 1 of the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act 37 of 2002 (hereafter the FAIS Act). On the other hand, upon any failure to investigate such complaints, the complainant may approach the Financial Services Tribunal, either to give directions to the FAIS Ombud regarding how to investigate the complaint or to replace this failure with the Tribunal's own investigation/reconsideration of a decision as regulated in section 8 of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 (hereafter the PAJA). An administrative decision is defined in the Financial Sector Regulation Act 9 of 2017 (hereafter the FSRA) which includes the statutory ombud (example, FAIS Ombud) decisions, such as a decision not to investigate a complaint. When an insurer's decision is in fact an administrative decision, reference should also be made to the FSRA, i.e. an insurer's decision to debar an employee/representative or a decision not to update relevant policyholder records with new information. An insurer's decision not to update policyholder records is not part of this statutory regulation (FSRA) of what constitutes an administrative decision; nevertheless the PAJA could still be relevant to understand when these decisions could be considered a public function. Although the latter falls outside the scope of this article, the National Horse Racing Authority of Southern Africa v Cyril Naidoo 2010 3 SA 182 (N) is briefly discussed in this article with reference to a public function. In this article, the failure of the FAIS Ombud to investigate a policyholder's (hereafter client) complaint (the insurer is unwilling to update client records) is an administrative decision and it is specifically regulated by FSRA. For this reason, the relevance of the Financial Services Tribunal is discussed when the FAIS Ombud directs the complaint (or the client may also refer a matter in specific circumstances, as if the FAIS Ombud fails to investigate the matter within a reasonable time) to the Financial Services Tribunal for a reconsideration of the decision.
5
Решота Reshota, Володимир Volodymyr. « Реформа адміністративної юстиції у Сполученому Королівстві Великої Британії та Північної Ірландії ». Copernicus Political and Legal Studies 1, no 2 (2022) : 24–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/cpls.20222.02.
Texte intégralRésumé :
The article examines the essence and significance of the institution of administrative justice in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. It is noted that the modern Anglo-Saxon model of administrative justice emerged in the early twentieth century, creating a system different from continental European countries to protect the rights of citizens from decisions, actions and inaction of public administration and control them, which plays an important role in public administration. The lack of a unified theory of administrative justice, the chaotic creation of its bodies has led to different interpretations and understandings of the system of administrative justice. It is emphasized that today there is no consensus on the concept, nature and system of administrative justice in the United Kingdom, but a study of various theoretical concepts and opinions in this regard led to the conclusion that the main administrative justice bodies are special quasi-judicial institutions - tribunals. the bulk of administrative disputes in the field of public administration. It is substantiated that the Anglo-Saxon model of administrative justice is characterized by significant differences in the nature of its bodies, historical development, procedural features and so on. The administrative justice of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is represented by a system of tribunals empowered to deal with a range of matters concerning illegal decisions, acts or omissions of officials and public authorities. Such tribunals are quasi-judicial institutions that consider and resolve administrative disputes in a procedure that resembles the judiciary, but are not part of the judicial system of the state, thus forming separate bodies with specific functions. Today, the importance of tribunals is constantly growing, from temporary special purpose bodies they are becoming an important element of the justice system. Thus, in recent years, the United Kingdom has been reformed to improve the system of administrative justice, unify and develop common standards for their work. It is analyzed that in 2007, with the adoption of the Act on Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Proceedings, which entered into force on November 3, 2008, a new period of administrative justice of the United Kingdom began. This law significantly reformed the organizational framework of the tribunal system, as well as created the preconditions for the convergence of the tribunal system and the courts in order to create a single mechanism for protecting the rights and freedoms of individuals. It was emphasized that the modern system of tribunals has ceased to be perceived as a temporary, additional way to protect the rights of the individual, and together with the courts has become an essential part of the system of protection of rights.
6
Romli, Fariza, et Harlida Abdul Wahab. « Pelaksanaan Sistem Tribunal di Malaysia : Ke Arah Penambahbaikan ». Kanun : Jurnal Undang-undang Malaysia 32, no 2 (2 juillet 2020) : 223–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.37052/kanun.32(2)no3.
Texte intégralRésumé :
The existence of a tribunal system, in addition to helping to smooth the administration system, is considered as sharing power with the judiciary in making decisions. Thus arose the question of decision- making power and prevention of abuse by the administrative body. In line with the Sustainable Development Goals 2030 to ensure justice in support of effective, responsible and inclusive institutions, transparent and fair practices are essential for ensuring people’s trust in the administrative body and government. This paper, therefore, discusses the tribunal system and its implementation in Malaysia. In view of this, tribunal systems that exist in other countries, especially the United Kingdom, are also examined as models for improvement. Matters such as autonomy or control of power and the trial process are among the issues raised. Recommendations for improvement are proposed based on three basic principles—openness, fairness and impartiality—to further strengthen the implementation of the existing tribunal system in line with developments abroad.
7
Morgan, James. « Securing the Administrative Appeals Tribunal’s independence : Tenure and mechanisms of appointment ». Alternative Law Journal 43, no 4 (15 novembre 2018) : 302–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1037969x18790046.
Texte intégralRésumé :
The Administrative Appeals Tribunal must be independent from inappropriate influence, and the perception of such influence, in order to effectively perform its duties of de novo merits review of government decisions. Drawing on recent controversies surrounding the Administrative Appeals Tribunal in 2017, this article concludes that the current mechanisms of Administrative Appeals Tribunal member reappointment exposes the Administrative Appeals Tribunal to a risk of inappropriate influence by the government of the day or at least a risk of public perception to that effect. After examining several possible reforms to minimise this risk, this paper proposes the creation of an independent reappointment committee for the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.
8
Garant, Patrice. « Le devoir d'équité procédurale et le contrôle judiciaire ou quasi judiciaire de la procédure administrative ». Les Cahiers de droit 23, no 3 (12 avril 2005) : 587–624. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/042509ar.
Texte intégralRésumé :
The doctrine of « procedural fairness » is widening its scope of application to all kinds of administrative decisions. « Procedure » must, as a notion, therefore be clearly defined. The definitions given by the authors or by case-law make it difficult to distinguish between « procedure » and « merits ». The jurisprudence of the Commission de la Fonction publique du Québec, an appeal Tribunal under the Quebec Civil Service Act, is quite relevant since section 77 of the Act gives to the Commission jurisdiction to hear appeals when « the verification procedure of eligibility of candidates or the selection procedure was irregular or illegal ». The Commission, as a specialised expert appeal Tribunal, has adopted a very liberal approach of the concept of procedure. From that experience one may question the diserability of having the ordinary Courts of Justice control of the fairness of administrative procedure. If so, which of an Administrative Tribunal or a Superior Court is the appropriate forum to deal with procedural deficiencies within the administrative process? Up to now, Administrative Tribunals have done well in that field.
9
Duplé, Nicole. « Nouvelles récentes de l'article 96 ». Les Cahiers de droit 18, no 2-3 (12 avril 2005) : 315–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/042168ar.
Texte intégralRésumé :
When called upon, to ascertain the ambit of the application of section 96 of the B.N.A. Act (1867), our courts have devised a method of reasoning by historical analogy between different types of jurisdictions. In Tomko v. Labour Relations Board (N.S.) and al., the Supreme Court was given the opportunity to make a clear synthesis of the principles underlying such an approach. Although the Court's decision makes no innovations in this respect, it establishes clear guidelines to be followed by the judiciary when it shall next be called upon to pronounce itself on the constitutionnality of the conferral of jurisdiction upon inferior tribunals or provincial administrative organisms in the light of section 96. The Supreme Court is now hearing the appeal in P.g. du Québec et Tribunal des Transports v. Farrah. In that case, the Court of Appeal held that when the Transport Tribunal hears an appeal from the Transport Commission on questions of law only, it exercises a jurisdiction which is analogous to the superintending power of the Superior Court. The Court of appeal therefore considered that the judges of the Transport Tribunal fall under the application of section 96. If the Supreme Court were to confirm the appeal tribunal's decisions it most probably would also have to examin the constitutionnality of certain "privative" clauses; if it were to refuse to adopt the Court of appeal's view, it would render possible the establishment of an administrative appeal court whose judges would be nominated by the Province.
10
Elliott, Mark, et Robert Thomas. « TRIBUNAL JUSTICE AND PROPORTIONATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION ». Cambridge Law Journal 71, no 2 (15 juin 2012) : 297–324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0008197312000505.
Texte intégralRésumé :
AbstractThe tribunals system in England and Wales has been transformed by the entry into force of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007; among other things, tribunals are now located more firmly and explicitly than ever before within the judicial branch. Questions concerning the relationship between tribunals and regular courts fall to be confronted afresh within this new institutional landscape. Those questions form the focus of this article, which is particularly concerned with the issue recently considered by the Supreme Court in Cart whether, and if so to what extent, decisions taken within the tribunals system (by the Upper Tribunal) should be susceptible to judicial review by the High Court. In Cart, emphasis was placed upon the concept of “proportionate dispute resolution” as a means by which to delimit regular courts' oversight of tribunals' decisions, raising fundamental questions both of legal doctrine (relating to the relevance of the orthodox doctrinal tools of administrative law) and legal policy (concerning the degree of error on the part of a tribunal that a higher court should tolerate in the interests of the efficient, or proportionate, use of judicial resources).
Thèses sur le sujet "Administrative Decisions Tribunal"
1
Simpson, Rohan D. S. « Got AATitude ? A quantitative analysis of refugee decision-making at the Administrative Appeals Tribunal ». Thesis, Department of Government and International Relations, 2020. https://hdl.handle.net/2123/21665.
Texte intégralRésumé :
The Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) is the first level of appeal for an asylum seeker whose application has been rejected by the Department of Home Affairs. There have been allegations that appointments at the AAT have become politicised. Despite these concerns, there exists no empirical means to test political influence at the AAT. This thesis develops a method to quantitatively test these allegations and provide further insights into asylum decision-making. Drawing off a specially generated Database of all publicly available refugee decisions at the AAT for the years 2015-2018 (2,272 cases), this study measures the effect of the Party appointing each Member on asylum outcomes. The key finding is that the odds of a Labor-appointed Member giving a favourable decision to an asylum-seeker were 1.46 times higher than those of a Liberal-appointed Member. Further, this study finds that the decision patterns vary significantly between Labor- and Liberal-appointed Members for applications from the same country of origin.
2
Fleming, Gabriel Catherine. « Rival goals and values in administrative review : a study of migration decision making ». University of Sydney. Law, 2001. http://hdl.handle.net/2123/839.
Texte intégralRésumé :
Some form of administrative review of executive action is accepted in the common law world for the reason that it serves certain basic values and goals. This study draws on political, legal and management theory in considering the values that underlie administrative review. It is primarily concerned with the role of tribunal review. A full range of values are considered, including fairness, justice, consistency, rationality, dignity, respect, accessibility, equity, efficiency and economy. Some are seen as fundamental to the administrative review system while others have different purposes. There is general agreement on many of the values and goals of administrative review. In their practical application however, values compete, overlap and evolve in accordance with economic, social, political and legal change. There are value tensions in, for instance, the role of independent tribunals as a check on the power of the executive while they are also within the executive, in the extent of the obligation on administrative tribunals to apply government policy and in the setting of proper limits of judicial review. There is continuing tension in demands for individual dignity and rights to fair treatment on the one hand and notions of the 'public interest' on the other. This thesis argues that the provision of tribunal review of administrative decisions is increasingly ideologically driven and focussed on 'functional' or 'management' values. At times these have trumped other values in decisions about entitlements to procedural fairness, access to review, effectiveness in public administration and the achievement of the 'correct and preferable' decision in the instant case. The focus of this thesis is a case study of migration decision-making. The importance of this area of study is evident in the potentially devastating consequences that migration decisions can have for individuals and families. In the context of Australia's history of inadequate and racially based migration policies, independent administrative review provides security against arbitrariness and discrimination in decision-making. An analysis of administrative review of decisions made under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) by the Migration Review Tribunal, and its predecessor the Immigration Review Tribunal, illustrates the claim that values, in their application, have real, practical and local importance. Issues of tribunal independence and accountability, the normative goal of review and procedural justice are considered in depth. It is argued that where compromises are made in administrative review, underlying values should be revealed so that their practical consequences may be better understood. The need to articulate and analyze these issues has never been greater. The Australian administrative review system is in a period of change analogous to that of the introduction of the 'new' administrative law in the 1970s. If tribunals are to continue to play an effective role then it is important to think clearly about how they can, in practice, embody the right mix of administrative law values.
3
Ruiz, Castellanos Maribel. « Vinculatoriedad del precedente judicial en las decisiones de los tribunales administrativos : a propósito de la singular interpretación que realizó el Tribunal Fiscal del criterio vinculante desarrollado en la Casación N° 4392-2013 Lima ». Bachelor's thesis, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/16641.
Texte intégral
4
Díaz, Canales Aldo Ricardo Sebastián. « De la decisión del Tribunal de Contratación Pública en orden a negarse a retrotraer procesos licitatorios viciados por ilegalidades y arbitrariedades declaradas ». Tesis, Universidad de Chile, 2011. http://www.repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/111871.
Texte intégralRésumé :
Memoria (licenciado en ciencias jurídicas y sociales)No autorizado por el autor para ser publicada a texto completo en portal tesis electrónicas de la Universidad de Chile
La jurisprudencia del Tribunal de Contratación Pública ha sostenido que la sentencia que declara la invalidación de actos u omisiones ilegales o arbitrarias ocurridos en procedimientos administrativos de licitación en que puedan incurrir los organismos públicos regidos por la LBCAS y PS y, que tengan lugar entre la aprobación de las bases de la respectiva licitación y su adjudicación, no deben retrotraerse a su etapa inicial, para con ello no afectar los derechos de terceros que están de buena fe. Lo anterior, fundado en que éste es un límite a la potestad invalidatoria del Estado, reconocido en la doctrina imperante de nuestro medio jurídico. Se argumenta que esta posición es errónea, puesto que prioriza el interés del particular, protegiendo derechos de terceros de buena fe inclusive, nacidos de un acto viciado. Ello, afectaría los principios de certeza y seguridad jurídica basados en el principio de igualdad que tutela nuestro ordenamiento constitucional, los cuales se cumplirían tan sólo con la retroacción a la situación anterior al acto ilegal, restableciendo con ello el imperio del derecho.
5
Pinto, Edson Antônio Sousa Pontes. « Da vinculação dos tribunais administrativos tributários à sistemática de precedentes do Código de Processo Civil : uma análise fundamentada no princípio constitucional da eficiência ». Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2018. https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/21742.
Texte intégralRésumé :
Submitted by Filipe dos Santos (fsantos@pucsp.br) on 2018-12-13T11:43:28Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
Edson Antônio Sousa Pontes Pinto.pdf: 1981621 bytes, checksum: bc7bb8054d74f9d5b4b68138c6510ee1 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2018-12-13T11:43:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Edson Antônio Sousa Pontes Pinto.pdf: 1981621 bytes, checksum: bc7bb8054d74f9d5b4b68138c6510ee1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-11-22
The system of precedents established by the Civil Procedure Code bases on the need for integrity and stability of the legal system, as well as on the imperative guarantee of the uniqueness of the decisions set by the courts that have the competence to standardize the jurisprudence. The objective is to ensure that equal cases are treated in the same way, thus fulfilling the fundamental right of equality laid down in the Federal Constitution. That is, to apply precedents is to exercise the jurisdictional activity guided on the coherence of judgments, based on the arguments already established by the high courts, but above all is to bring rationality to the legal system and to the courts avoiding that these decisions be discarded, ignored or disrespected without any plausible reasoning, or reasons for it. Therefore, all those who have the power to judge, even if in an administrative jurisdiction, should adhere to and respect precedents established by the major courts, since they are bound to them by the constitutional principle of efficiency. This principle mandates that the Public Administration achieve the same purpose with the use of fewer resources, that is, applying this principle in judicial activity, the administrative judge must adhere to established precedents, considered public goods, avoiding that a thesis already judged and pacified is ignored or discarded without its due overruling. The present paper aims to demonstrate that the Tax Administrative Courts must follow precedents, because they are bound by Civil Procedure Code, but, above all, by a duty of efficiency, ordered by such principle, which dictates public agents and obliges them to act with rationality in administrative functions and activities, including here the judicial exercise of such courts
A sistemática de precedentes trazida pelo Código de Processo Civil fundamenta-se na necessidade de integridade e de estabilidade do sistema jurídico, bem como na imperiosa garantia de unicidade dos entendimentos firmados pelos tribunais que têm por competência uniformizar a jurisprudência, garantindo-se, assim, que casos iguais sejam tratados da mesma forma, concretizando, por conseguinte, o direito fundamental de igualdade previsto na Constituição Federal. Ou seja, aplicar precedentes é exercer a atividade jurisdicional pautado na coerência dos julgamentos, baseando-se nas teses já firmadas pelos tribunais de competência superior, mas, sobretudo, é trazer racionalidade ao sistema jurídico e aos órgãos judicantes, evitando-se que esses entendimentos pacificados sejam descartados, ignorados ou desrespeitados sem que haja fundamentação plausível ou motivos determinantes para tanto. Logo, todos aqueles que tem o poder-dever de julgar, mesmo que em sede administrativa, devem se pautar e respeitar os precedentes firmados pelas cortes maiores, visto que se encontram vinculados a eles pelo princípio constitucional da eficiência. Tal princípio ordena que a Administração Pública atinja o mesmo fim com a utilização de menos recursos, ou seja, trazendo à atividade jurisdicional, deve o julgador administrativo, por este princípio, aplicar os precedentes firmados, como bens públicos que são, evitando-se que uma tese já julgada e pacificada seja ignorada ou descartada sem a sua devida superação. O presente trabalho objetiva, portanto, demonstrar que os Tribunais Administrativos Tributários devem seguir precedentes, por estarem vinculados à sistemática do Código de Processo Civil, mas, acima de tudo, por um dever de eficiência, ordenado por tal princípio, que pauta os agentes públicos e os obriga a agir com racionalidade no trato das funções e das atividades administrativas, incluindo-se, aqui, o exercício jurisdicional desses tribunais
6
Kardimis, Théofanis. « La chambre criminelle de la Cour de cassation face à l’article 6 de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme : étude juridictionnelle comparée (France-Grèce) ». Thesis, Lyon, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017LYSE3004.
Texte intégralRésumé :
La première partie de l’étude est consacrée à l’invocation, intra et extra muros, du droit à un procès équitable. Sont analysés ainsi, dans un premier temps, l’applicabilité directe de l’article 6 et la subsidiarité de la Convention par rapport au droit national et de la Cour Européenne des Droits de l’Homme par rapport aux juridictions nationales. Le droit à un procès équitable étant un droit jurisprudentiel, l’étude se focalise, dans un second temps, sur l’invocabilité des arrêts de la Cour Européenne et plus précisément sur l’invocabilité directe de l’arrêt qui constate une violation du droit à un procès équitable dans une affaire mettant en cause l’Etat et l’invocabilité de l’interprétation conforme à l’arrêt qui interprète l’article 6 dans une affaire mettant en cause un Etat tiers. L’introduction dans l’ordre juridique français et hellénique de la possibilité de réexamen de la décision pénale définitive rendue en violation de la Convention a fait naitre un nouveau droit d’accès à la Cour de cassation lequel trouve son terrain de prédilection aux violations de l’article 6 et constitue peut-être le pas le plus important pour le respect du droit à un procès équitable après l’acceptation (par la France et la Grèce) du droit de recours individuel. Quant au faible fondement de l’autorité de la chose interprétée par la Cour Européenne, qui est d’ailleurs un concept d’origine communautaire, cela explique pourquoi un dialogue indirect entre la Cour Européenne et la Cour de cassation est possible sans pour autant changer en rien l’invocabilité de l’interprétation conforme et le fait que l’existence d’un précédent oblige la Cour de cassation à motiver l’interprétation divergente qu’elle a adoptée.La seconde partie de l’étude, qui est plus volumineuse, est consacrée aux garanties de bonne administration de la justice (article 6§1), à la présomption d’innocence (article 6§2), aux droits qui trouvent leur fondement conventionnel dans l’article 6§1 mais leur fondement logique dans la présomption d’innocence et aux droits de la défense (article 6§3). Sont ainsi analysés le droit à un tribunal indépendant, impartial et établi par la loi, le délai raisonnable, le principe de l’égalité des armes, le droit à une procédure contradictoire, le droit de la défense d’avoir la parole en dernier, la publicité de l’audience et du prononcé des jugements et arrêts, l’obligation de motivation des décisions, la présomption d’innocence, dans sa dimension procédurale et personnelle, le « droit au mensonge », le droit de l’accusé de se taire et de ne pas contribuer à son auto-incrimination, son droit d’être informé de la nature et de la cause de l’accusation et de la requalification envisagée des faits, son droit au temps et aux facilités nécessaires à la préparation de la défense, y compris notamment la confidentialité de ses communications avec son avocat et le droit d’accès au dossier, son droit de comparaître en personne au procès, le droit de la défense avec ou sans l’assistance d’un avocat, le droit de l’accusé d’être représenté en son absence par son avocat, le droit à l’assistance gratuite d’un avocat lorsque la situation économique de l’accusé ne permet pas le recours à l’assistance d’un avocat mais les intérêts de la justice l’exigent, le droit d’interroger ou faire interroger les témoins à charge et d’obtenir la convocation et l’interrogation des témoins à décharge dans les mêmes conditions que les témoins à charge et le droit à l’interprétation et à la traduction des pièces essentielles du dossier. L’analyse est basée sur la jurisprudence strasbourgeoise et centrée sur la position qu’adoptent la Cour de cassation française et l’AréopageThe first party of the study is dedicated to the invocation of the right to a fair trial intra and extra muros and, on this basis, it focuses on the direct applicability of Article 6 and the subsidiarity of the Convention and of the European Court of Human Rights. Because of the fact that the right to a fair trial is a ‘‘judge-made law’’, the study also focuses on the invocability of the judgments of the European Court and more precisely on the direct invocability of the European Court’s judgment finding that there has been a violation of the Convention and on the request for an interpretation in accordance with the European Court’s decisions. The possibility of reviewing the criminal judgment made in violation of the Convention has generated a new right of access to the Court of cassation which particularly concerns the violations of the right to a fair trial and is probably the most important step for the respect of the right to a fair trial after enabling the right of individual petition. As for the weak conventional basis of the authority of res interpretata (“autorité de la chose interprétée”), this fact explains why an indirect dialogue between the ECHR and the Court of cassation is possible but doesn’t affect the applicant’s right to request an interpretation in accordance with the Court’s decisions and the duty of the Court of cassation to explain why it has decided to depart from the (non-binding) precedent.The second party of the study is bigger than the first one and is dedicated to the guarantees of the proper administration of justice (Article 6§1), the presumption of innocence (Article 6§2), the rights which find their conventional basis on the Article 6§1 but their logical explanation to the presumption of innocence and the rights of defence (Article 6§3). More precisely, the second party of the study is analyzing the right to an independent and impartial tribunal established by law, the right to a hearing within a reasonable time, the principle of equality of arms, the right to adversarial proceedings, the right of the defence to the last word, the right to a public hearing and a public pronouncement of the judgement, the judge’s duty to state the reasons for his decision, the presumption of innocence, in both its procedural and personal dimensions, the accused’s right to lie, his right to remain silent, his right against self-incrimination, his right to be informed of the nature and the cause of the accusation and the potential re-characterisation of the facts, his right to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of the defence, including in particular the access to the case-file and the free and confidential communication with his lawyer, his right to appear in person at the trial, his right to defend either in person or through legal assistance, his right to be represented by his counsel, his right to free legal aid if he hasn’t sufficient means to pay for legal assistance but the interests of justice so require, his right to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him and his right to the free assistance of an interpreter and to the translation of the key documents. The analysis is based on the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and focuses on the position taken by the French and the Greek Court of Cassation (Areopagus) on each one of the above mentioned rights
7
Santos, Henrique Guilherme Amaral. « Procedimentos de licitações públicas : Análise das irregularidades mais frequentes e classificação do grau de risco de desvirtuação da qualidade da licitação ». Master's thesis, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10071/3869.
Texte intégralRésumé :
Este trabalho estuda a Administração Pública no Brasil sob o prisma dos processos licitatórios. As licitações públicas fornecem um ambiente rico de situações para o estudo da administração no Setor Público, uma vez que não envolvem somente os protocolos para a aquisição de bens e serviços ou contratação de obras, mas também as atividades operacionais de pagamento e gerenciamento dessas atividades. O Tribunal de Contas da União é o órgão responsável pelo controle externo no Brasil. Ele contempla e julga as contas das diversas unidades administrativas da União e publica suas deliberações no seu endereço eletrônico: www.tcu.org.br. Essas decisões, chamadas “acórdãos”, contém as irregularidades identificadas pelos auditores daquele órgão e o posicionamento dos ministros, justificando a condenação ou absolvição dos responsáveis. Usamos parâmetros delimitadores para criar uma amostra de acórdãos com a qual pudéssemos trabalhar e investigar quais irregularidades relacionadas às licitações públicas são mais frequentemente praticadas. Assim, conseguimos listar as infrações mais comuns e criar informações quantitativas acerca da condução das unidades administrativas brasileiras, principalmente no que se refere às licitações públicas e atividades correlatas (execução das despesas e convênios). Isso nos permitiu formular sugestões e chegar a conclusões específicas, no sentido de melhorar os processos pertinentes à Administração Pública.This dissertation studies the brazilian Public Administration under the prism of the licitatory processes. Public licitations supply a rich environment of situations for the study of the administration in the Public Sector, once they comprise not only the protocols to the aquisition of goods and services or the contraction of constructions, but the payment and financial activities and management of those processes as well. The Tribunal de Contas da União is the organization responsable for the external control in Brazil. It contemplates and judges the accounts of the various public entities and publishes its decisions on its eletronic address: www.tcu.org.br. These decisions, called “acórdãos”, contain the identified irregularities and the position of the ministers, justifying the condemnation or acquittal of the responsables. We used delimiting parameters to create a sample with which we could work and investigate which public licitation related irregularities occur more often. Therefore, we could list the most common infractions and create quantitative information related to the management of the brazilian public entities, mainly in what refers to the public licitations and related activities (payment process and covenant). That allowed us to formulate sugestions and get to especific conclusions, trying to improve the processes relevant to Public Administration.
8
Bayrak, Sule. « Contextualizing discretion : micro-dynamics of Canada’s refugee determination system ». Thèse, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/1866/13580.
Texte intégralRésumé :
À une époque où l'immigration internationale est de plus en plus difficile et sélective, le statut de réfugié constitue un bien public précieux qui permet à certains non-citoyens l'accès et l'appartenance au pays hôte. Reposant sur le jugement discrétionnaire du décideur, le statut de réfugié n’est accordé qu’aux demandeurs qui établissent une crainte bien fondée de persécution en cas de retour dans leur pays d'origine. Au Canada, le plus important tribunal administratif indépendant, la Commission de l'immigration et du statut de réfugié du Canada (CISR), est chargé d’entendre les demandeurs d'asile et de rendre des décisions de statut de réfugié. Cette thèse cherche à comprendre les disparités dans le taux d’octroi du statut de réfugié entre les décideurs de la CISR qui sont politiquement nommés.
Au regard du manque de recherches empiriques sur la manière avec laquelle le Canada alloue les possibilités d’entrée et le statut juridique pour les non-citoyens, il était nécessaire de lever le voile sur le fonctionnement de l’administration sur cette question. En explorant la prise de décision relative aux réfugiés à partir d'une perspective de Street Level Bureaucracy Theory (SLBT) et une méthodologie ethnographique qui combine l'observation directe, les entretiens semi-structurés et l'analyse de documents, l'étude a d'abord cherché à comprendre si la variation dans le taux d’octroi du statut était le résultat de différences dans les pratiques et le raisonnement discrétionnaires du décideur et ensuite à retracer les facteurs organisationnels qui alimentent les différences.
Dans la lignée des travaux de SLBT qui documentent la façon dont la situation de travail structure la discrétion et l’importance des perceptions individuelles dans la prise de décision, cette étude met en exergue les différences de fond parmi les décideurs concernant les routines de travail, la conception des demandeurs d’asile, et la meilleure façon de mener leur travail. L’analyse montre comment les décideurs appliquent différentes approches lors des audiences, allant de l’interrogatoire rigide à l’entrevue plus flexible. En dépit des contraintes organisationnelles qui pèsent sur les décideurs pour accroître la cohérence et l’efficacité, l’importance de l’évaluation de la crédibilité ainsi que l’invisibilité de l’espace de décision laissent suffisamment de marge pour l’exercice d’un pouvoir discrétionnaire.
Même dans les environnements comme les tribunaux administratifs où la surabondance des règles limite fortement la discrétion, la prise de décision est loin d’être synonyme d’adhésion aux principes de neutralité et hiérarchie. La discrétion est plutôt imbriquée dans le contexte de routines d'interaction, de la situation de travail, de l’adhésion aux règles et du droit. Même dans les organisations qui institutionnalisent et uniformisent la formation et communiquent de façon claire leurs demandes aux décideurs, le caractère discrétionnaire de la décision est par la nature difficile, voire impossible, à contrôler et discipliner. Lorsqu'ils sont confrontés à l'ambiguïté des objectifs et aux exigences qui s’opposent à leur pouvoir discrétionnaire, les décideurs réinterprètent la définition de leur travail et banalisent leurs pratiques. Ils formulent une routine de rencontre qui est acceptable sur le plan organisationnel pour évaluer les demandeurs face à eux. Cette thèse montre comment les demandeurs, leurs témoignages et leurs preuves sont traités d’une manière inégale et comment ces traitements se répercutent sur la décision des réfugiés.In an era where international immigration is increasingly difficult and selective, refugee status constitutes a valuable public good that enables some non-citizens access and membership to the host country. Based on the discretionary judgment of the decision-maker, refugee status is only granted to claimants who establish well-founded fear of persecution if returned to their home country. Canada’s largest independent administrative tribunal, Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB), is charged to hear refugee claimants and make refugee status determinations. This dissertation investigates why significant disparities exist among IRB’s politically appointed decision-makers’ refugee status grant rates. As little was known about the concrete ways Canada allocates opportunities for entry and legal status for non-citizens, lifting the blanket of administration was necessary. By exploring refugee decision-making from a Street Level Bureaucracy Theory (SLBT) perspective, and an ethnographic methodology that combined direct observation, semi-structured interviews and document analysis, the study sought first to understand whether the variation in grant rates were a result of differences in decision-makers’ discretionary practices and reasoning and second to trace the organizational factors that foster variation. In line with previous scholarship on SLBT that document how the work situation structure discretion and how individual views play in decision-making; this study demonstrates substantive differences among decision-makers in terms of their work routines, conceptions of refugee claimants and the best way to conduct their work. The analysis illustrates how decision-makers apply not a singular but a variety of approaches to the refugee hearing, ranging from rigid interrogation to the more resilient interview style. Despite clear organizational constraints on decision-makers that target to increase consistency and efficiency of refugee determinations, the significance of credibility-assessment and the invisibility of the decision-making space leave ample room for discretionary behavior. Even in rule-saturated environments like administrative tribunals which extensively regulate discretion; decision-making hardly means neutral and hierarchical rule adherence. Instead discretion is nested within the context of interaction routines, work situation, rule adherence and law. It is inherently difficult if not improbable to control and discipline discretionary decision-making even in organizations that institutionalize and standardize training and communicate their demands clearly to decision-makers. When faced with goal ambiguity and with demands that they consider run against their discretionary authority, decision-makers reinterpret their job definition and routinize their practices. They formulate an encounter routine that is organizationally acceptable to assess the people in front of them. This dissertation illustrates how unevenly the claimants, their testimony and evidence are treated and how these treatments are reflected on the refugee decision.
9
Zwierz, Marta. « Zakaz ne bis in idem w prawie administracyjnym ». Doctoral thesis, 2020. https://depotuw.ceon.pl/handle/item/3660.
Texte intégralRésumé :
Przedmiotem rozprawy doktorskiej jest zakaz ne bis in idem w prawie administracyj-nym. Autor zakłada, że zakaz ne bis in idem nie dotyczy już wyłącznie norm prawa karnego, ale ma charakter dyrektywy ogólnosystemowej, a więc posiadającej w pewnym sensie znacze-nie także z punktu widzenia norm prawa administracyjnego. Sama rozprawa doktorska składa się z pięciu rozdziałów poprzedzonych uwagami wstępnymi i zakończonych wnioskami. Autor stosuje formalno-dogmatyczną metodę badawczą.
W pierwszym rozdziale rozważa poszczególne aspekty obowiązywania zakazu ne bis in idem w prawie karnym. Autor udowadnia również, że za sprawą norm prawa międzynarodo-wego doszło do uwolnienia zakazu ne bis in idem spod reżimu prawa karnego.
W drugim rozdziale zwraca uwagę na specyficzną konstrukcję zakazu ne bis in idem jako zasady konstytucyjnej. W tym ujęciu autor stara się określić, czy posiada on charakter wiążący ustawodawcę i organy stosujące prawo. Istotne znaczenie z punktu widzenia autora ma także określenie, czy zakaz ne bis in idem wpisuje się do kręgu publicznych praw podmio-towych, czy w dalszym ciągu jest jedynie uzasadnionym oczekiwaniem obywateli. Autor zwraca uwagę na wyraźny podział materii prawnej w obszarze stosowania zakazu ne bis in idem na poziomie konstytucyjnym na dwie sfery: karania i sankcjonowania.
Punktem wyjścia dla rozważań prowadzonych w trzecim rozdziale jest uznanie, iż na zakres obowiązywania zakazu ne bis in idem w prawie administracyjnym wpływa orzecznic-two Trybunału Konstytucyjnego. Autor podejmuje się zatem ustalenia za sprawą jakich rodza-jów sankcji administracyjnych obywatele mogą domagać się ochrony prawnej.
W czwartym rozdziale zwraca uwagę na to, że w obszarze prawa materialnego walor ochronny zakazu ne bis in idem ogranicza się wyłącznie do niektórych z wielu możliwych wa-riantów zbiegu sankcji prawnych. Autor stoi na straży przekonania, zgodnie z którym zakres obowiązywania zakazu ne bis in idem znajduje swoje uzasadnienie w aksjologii prawa admini-stracyjnego. Wskazuje zatem na granicę wyznaczoną przez ustawodawcę pomiędzy typowymi środkami policji administracyjnej a środkami przymusu administracyjnego i sankcjami praw-nymi polegającymi na pozbawieniu lub ograniczeniu określonych kategorii uprawnień. Rozwa-ża zarazem jej zgodność w świetle klauzuli interesu publicznego oraz konstytucyjnego wymo-gu proporcjonalności reakcji prawnej na naruszenie obowiązku prawnego.
Piąty rozdział dotyczy proceduralnego aspektu zakazu ne bis in idem w prawie admini-stracyjnym. Autor zakłada, że w tym ujęciu jest on ściśle powiązany z przesłanką procesową res iudicata. Zmierza zatem do wykazania, że ma on znaczenie nie tylko na etapie postępowa-nia sądowoadministracyjnego, ale urzeczywistnia ideę niesioną za pomocą zakazu ne bis in idem już na drodze ogólnego postępowania administracyjnego. W tym rozdziale autor stara się dodatkowo udzielić odpowiedzi na pytanie, czy instytucja zagadnienia wstępnego i Rozstrzy-gnięcia tymczasowe mają istotne znaczenie z punktu widzenia zakazu ne bis in idem.The subject of the doctoral dissertation is the prohibition of ne bis in idem in adminis-trative law. The author assumes that the prohibition of ne bis in idem no longer concerns only criminal law standards, but that it is a system-wide directive which is, in some sense, also rele-vant from the point of view of the rules of administrative law. The doctoral disservice itself consists of five chapters preceded by preliminary observations and completed proposals. The author applies a formal-dogmatic test method. The first chapter examines the various aspects of the prohibition of ne bis in idem in criminal law. The author also proves that the prohibition of ne bis in idem from the criminal law regime has been liberated by the rules of international law. The second chapter draws attention to the specific design of the prohibition of ne bis in idem as a constitutional principle. In this regard, the author seeks to determine whether it is binding on the legislator and the authorities applying the law. It is also important for the au-thor to determine whether the prohibition of ne bis in idem forms part of the public subjective rights, or remains merely a legitimate expectation of citizens. The author draws attention to the clear breakdown of the legal matter in the area of application of the ne bis in idem prohibition at constitutional level into two spheres: punishment and sanctioning. The starting point for the considerations in the third chapter is that the case-law of the Constitutional Tribunal affects the scope of the ne bis in idem prohibition in administrative law. The author therefore undertakes to determine by which types of administrative sanctions citizens can claim legal protection. In the fourth chapter, it draws attention to the fact that, in the area of substantive law, the prohibition of ne bis in idem is limited to some of the many possible options of overlap-ping of legal sanctions. The author guards the conviction that the scope of the prohibition of ne bis in idem is justified in the axiology of administrative law. It therefore points to the bor-der set by the legislator between the typical measures of the administrative police and the means of administrative coerction and the legal sanctions of depriving or restricting certain categories of allowances. It also considers its compatibility in the light of the public interest clause and the constitutional requirement of proportionality of the legal response to breach of legal obligation. The fifth chapter concerns the procedural aspect of the prohibition of ne bis in idem in administrative law. The author assumes that in this regard it is closely linked to the procedural premise of res iudicata. It seeks, therefore, to demonstrate that it is relevant not only at the stage of the judicial procedure, but that it materialates the idea pursued by the prohibition of ne bis in idem by means of a general administrative procedure. In this chapter, the author seeks to further answer the question of whether the institution of preliminary issues and provi-sional decisions are of significant importance from the point of view of the prohibition of ne bis in idem.
Livres sur le sujet "Administrative Decisions Tribunal"
1
Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan Felix. Index of decisions of international administrative tribunals : Including League of Nations Administrative Tribunal ... 2e éd. [Washington, D.C.] : World Bank Administrative Tribunal, Office of the Executive Secretary, 1985.
Trouver le texte intégral
2
(Australia), Administrative Review Council. Environmental decisions and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal : Report to the Minister for Justice. Canberra : Australian Govt. Pub. Service, 1994.
Trouver le texte intégral
3
Amerasinghe, C. F. Index of decisions of international administrative tribunals. 3e éd. [Washington, D.C.] : World Bank Administrative Tribunal, Office of the Executive Secretary, 1991.
Trouver le texte intégral
4
1933-, Amerasinghe Chittharanjan Felix, et World Bank. Administrative Tribunal. Office of the Executive Secretary., dir. Index of decisions of international administrative tribunals. 3e éd. [Washington, D.C.] : World Bank Administrative Tribunal, Office of the Executive Secretary, 1991.
Trouver le texte intégral
5
Villaggi, Jean-Pierre. L'administration publique québécoise et le processus décisionnel : Des pouvoirs au contrôle administratif et judiciaire. Cowansville, Québec : Éditions Y. Blais, 2005.
Trouver le texte intégral
6
Infanzón, Jelio Paredes. La predictibilidad jurídica y el precedente : Precedentes vinculantes : constitucional judicial, administrativo : stare decisis, certiorari. Lima, Perú : San Marcos, 2008.
Trouver le texte intégral
7
Serrano, Santiago Basabe. Jueces sin toga : Políticas judiciales y toma de decisiones en el Tribunal Constitucional del Ecuador (1999-2007). Quito : FLACSO Sede Ecuador, 2011.
Trouver le texte intégral
8
Asociación por los Derechos Civiles (Buenos Aires, Argentina), dir. La corte y los derechos, 2005-2007 : Cómo impactan en la vida de los ciudadanos, las decisiones del máximo tribunal. Buenos Aires : Siglo Veintiuno Editores Argentina, 2008.
Trouver le texte intégral
9
Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service. Administrative Appeals Chamber Reports 2012 : (including Decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal, and of Courts and Tribunals Dealing with Related Matters). Stationery Office, The, 2013.
Trouver le texte intégral
10
Great Britain : H.M. Courts & Tribunals Service. Administrative Appeals Chamber Reports 2013 : (including Decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal, and of Courts and Tribunals Dealing with Related Matters). Stationery Office, The, 2014.
Trouver le texte intégralChapitres de livres sur le sujet "Administrative Decisions Tribunal"
1
Mantzari, Despoina. « Judicial Scrutiny of Regulatory Decisions at the UK’s Specialist Competition Appeal Tribunal ». Dans Judicial Review of Administrative Discretion in the Administrative State, 63–80. The Hague : T.M.C. Asser Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-307-8_4.
Texte intégral
2
Hannam, Ian. « Legislative Protection for the Soil Environment and Climate Change ». Dans International Yearbook of Soil Law and Policy 2022, 51–82. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40609-6_3.
Texte intégralRésumé :
AbstractRecent court decisions in Australia and in overseas jurisdictions have made important progress in society’s acceptance of the significance of climate change in the long-term protection of the environment. The term ‘climate litigation’ is now generally used to refer to legal proceedings initiated to establish responsibility for a failure to prevent or reduce the rate of climate change and/or mitigate its negative consequences. Such legal proceedings are being initiated in courts, tribunals and other rule compliance monitoring bodies, operating around the world, at the domestic, regional, or global level. One decision, in the New South Wales Land and Environment Court on 26 August 2021, orders the New South Wales Environment Protection Authority to develop environmental quality objectives, guidelines and policies to ensure protection of the environment from climate change with regard to its duties under the Protection of the Environment Administration Act 1991. This decision is regarded as a landmark decision in New South Wales in that it orders a statutory authority to exercise its duty and legal responsibilities under the Protection of the Environment Administration Act with regard to the level of seriousness that climate change impacts have reached for the New South Wales environment. The case is also significant because the definition of “environment” under the Protection of the Environment Administration Act encapsulates a broad range of ecological elements, including the “soil”. In this context, this chapter argues that the decision is important for a number of reasons including: by interpretation “soil” is a component of the “environment” and it should be protected from climate change under the Protection of the Environment Administration Act; the way the decision is made provides a guiding framework which can used to examine existing environmental laws for protection of the soil environment against climate change; and it provides a guiding framework to prepare new soil legislation with the requisite procedures to develop environmental quality objectives, guidelines and policies to protect the soil environment from climate change. Having regard to these various aspects of the decision, they provide a guiding structure in which to assess the protection of the soil environment in New South Wales, but also a procedure which might be beneficial to other countries to assess the legal protection of the soil environment. The way soil is being used in Australia and around the world is directly contributing to global warming by releasing carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. Soil degradation from agricultural land use, vegetation clearing and urban and infrastructure projects and pollution of soil from industrial works require closer attention from legislative and policy structures. Therefore, it is appropriate that increasing attention must be placed on the protection of the soil environment through the adoption of legislative, policy and mitigation responses which prevent the use of soil in a manner that makes it a significant contributor to climate change.
3
Elliott, Mark, et Jason Varuhas. « 18. Statutory Tribunals ». Dans Administrative Law. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198719465.003.0018.
Texte intégralRésumé :
This chapter deals with statutory tribunals, the growth of which mirrors the dramatic expansion of the state itself. It first explains what tribunals are and whether they are a good thing before discussing two important turning points in the development of tribunals: the Franks Report, published in 1957, and the Leggatt Review, published in 2001. It then considers the independence of tribunals, focusing on their judicial leadership as well as tribunal appointments. It also examines some of the key issues and themes which arise from tribunal procedure, paying attention to formality, representation, and the style of tribunal proceedings. The chapter concludes with an analysis of the structure of the tribunals system and its relationship with the courts, with particular emphasis on the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) and the Upper Tribunal (UT), appeals against tribunal decisions, and judicial review by and of the UT.
4
Parpworth, Neil. « 16. Tribunals, inquiries, and the ombudsmen remedy ». Dans Constitutional and Administrative Law, 369–404. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198847120.003.0016.
Texte intégralRésumé :
This chapter begins by distinguishing between tribunals and inquiries. A tribunal is a permanent body that sits periodically, while an inquiry is something which is established on an ad hoc basis. Tribunals are empowered to make decisions that are binding on those parties subject to their jurisdiction; inquiries generally do not have formal decision-making powers. Tribunals are concerned with matters of fact and law, whereas inquiries are concerned with wider policy issues. The discussion then turns to the reform of the tribunal system; the former Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council; the origins of ombudsmen; the Parliamentary Commissioner; ombudsmen of devolved institutions; the Health Service Commissioner; the Local Government Commissioners; ombudsmen and the courts; and proposals for a unified Public Service Ombudsman service.
5
Parpworth, Neil. « 16. Tribunals, inquiries, and the ombudsmen remedy ». Dans Constitutional and Administrative Law, 376–412. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780192856579.003.0016.
Texte intégralRésumé :
This chapter begins by distinguishing between tribunals and inquiries. A tribunal is a permanent body that sits periodically, while an inquiry is something which is established on an ad hoc basis. Tribunals are empowered to make decisions that are binding on those parties subject to their jurisdiction; inquiries generally do not have formal decision-making powers. Tribunals are concerned with matters of fact and law, whereas inquiries are concerned with wider policy issues. The discussion then turns to the reform of the tribunal system; the former Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council; the origins of ombudsmen; the Parliamentary Commissioner; ombudsmen of devolved institutions; the Health Service Commissioner; the Local Government Commissioners; ombudsmen and the courts; and proposals for a unified Public Service Ombudsman service.
6
Amerasinghe, C. F. « Taxation ». Dans Case-Law of the World Bank AdMinisirative Tribunal, 141–43. Oxford University PressOxford, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198258193.003.0026.
Texte intégralRésumé :
Abstract Although, as the Tribunal will note shortly, its own jurisdiction is not limited to review of affirmative administrative decisions but can encompass as well certain omissions or failures to act, the reference in Staff Rule 9. 01 to review of an ‘administrative decision’ can obviously give rise to uncertainties on the part of staff members.
7
Clayton, Gina, Georgina Firth, Caroline Sawyer, Rowena Moffatt et Helena Wray. « 7. Challenging decisions : appeals, administrative and judicial review ». Dans Immigration & ; Asylum Law. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198815211.003.0007.
Texte intégralRésumé :
Course-focused and comprehensive, the Textbook on series provides an accessible overview of the key areas on the law curriculum. This chapter discusses the structure of the appeals bodies—the Appeal Tribunal and the Special Immigration Appeals Commission—and their procedure and jurisdiction. It sets out the limited rights of appeal following implementation of the Immigration Act 2014. It has a section on administrative review. It concludes with a section on immigrants and asylum seekers’ access to legal representation.
8
Clayton, Gina, Georgina Firth, Caroline Sawyer et Rowena Moffatt. « 7. Challenging decisions : appeals, administrative and judicial review ». Dans Immigration & ; Asylum Law, 247–76. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198848936.003.0007.
Texte intégralRésumé :
This chapter discusses the development of the current structure of the appeals bodies—the Appeal Tribunal and the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC)—and their procedure. It sets out the limited rights of appeal following the implementation of the Immigration Act 2014. It has sections on administrative review and judicial review. The chapter also considers whether there is a right to a fair hearing in immigration and asylum decisions. It concludes with a section on immigrants and asylum seekers’ access to legal representation, including funding.
9
Divan, Shyam, et Armin Rosencranz. « National Green Tribunal ». Dans Environmental Law and Policy in India, 110—C5.N97. 3e éd. Oxford University PressOxford, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192865458.003.0005.
Texte intégralRésumé :
Abstract This chapter evaluates the National Green Tribunal (NGT), which is the primary environmental dispute resolution forum in India. Potentially, the NGT can develop into a world class institution which improves environmental law enforcement and the quality of the environment enjoyed by citizens. The provisions of the National Green Tribunal Act of 2010 create a Tribunal with immense jurisdiction that can wield this power to great effect to meet the daunting challenges. However, several factors — political, administrative, budgetary, and personality-related — impinge upon the growth of this forum into a dynamic agent of change. Nevertheless, with the necessary vision and leadership, the NGT could emerge as a forceful adjudicator that uses the cases before it to enhance ‘green governance’. The chapter then looks at the constitution and jurisdiction of the NGT; the changes brought about by the Finance Act of 2017; the suo motu jurisdiction and judicial review; and illustrative decisions by the NGT.
10
Amerasinghe, C. F. « Prejudice/Discrimination ». Dans Case-Law of the World Bank Administrative Tribunal, 66–70. Oxford University PressOxford, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198265764.003.0009.
Texte intégralRésumé :
Abstract Discrimination i.28. Before examining the evidence advanced by both parties as to the proper evaluation of the Applicant’s position, the Tribunal wishes to reiterate what it has previously decided as to the scope of its review of the Bank’s decisions arising from the Job Grading Program.