Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « Administrative agencies – Great Britain »
Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres
Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « Administrative agencies – Great Britain ».
À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.
Articles de revues sur le sujet "Administrative agencies – Great Britain"
Weidenfeld, Katia, et Alexis Spire. « Punishing tax offenders in France and Great Britain : two criminal policies ». Journal of Financial Crime 24, no 4 (2 octobre 2017) : 574–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jfc-05-2016-0030.
Texte intégralCawood, Ian. « Corruption and the Public Service Ethos in Mid-Victorian Administration : The Case of Leonard Horner and the Factory Office* ». English Historical Review 135, no 575 (août 2020) : 860–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehr/ceaa249.
Texte intégralDemchuk, N., et R. Havric. « Legal responsibility for illegal crossing of the state border : foreign experience of legal regulation ». Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, no 1 (2 juillet 2022) : 137–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2022.01.25.
Texte intégralDurdynets, Myroslav Yu, Raisa V. Perelyhina, Olga A. Klymenko, Iryna M. Semeniuk et Lidiia M. Kostetska. « Counteraction to Corruption Offences in Ukraine and the EU : Comparative Legal Aspect ». Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 9, no 5 (21 septembre 2020) : 227. http://dx.doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2020-0100.
Texte intégralSangster, Marcus. « Urban Fringe Forestry in Great Britain ». Arboriculture & ; Urban Forestry 19, no 1 (1 janvier 1993) : 51–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1993.010.
Texte intégralSousounis, Panos, et Gauthier Lanot. « Social networks and unemployment exit in Great Britain ». International Journal of Social Economics 45, no 8 (13 août 2018) : 1205–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijse-04-2017-0137.
Texte intégralFurgała, Agata. « POLICE COOPERATION OF POLAND AND GREAT BRITAIN IN SCOPE OF BREXIT ». PRZEGLĄD POLICYJNY 141, no 1 (12 juillet 2021) : 241–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.0407.
Texte intégralSavranchuk, L. L. « The essence of administrative discretion in the activities of public administration agencies ». Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, no 1 (2 juillet 2022) : 199–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2022.01.37.
Texte intégralGoodwin, John, Catherine Dolbear et Glen Hart. « Geographical Linked Data : The Administrative Geography of Great Britain on the Semantic Web ». Transactions in GIS 12 (décembre 2008) : 19–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2008.01133.x.
Texte intégralJantz, Bastian, Tanja Klenk, Flemming Larsen et Jay Wiggan. « Marketization and Varieties of Accountability Relationships in Employment Services : Comparing Denmark, Germany, and Great Britain ». Administration & ; Society 50, no 3 (22 avril 2015) : 321–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095399715581622.
Texte intégralThèses sur le sujet "Administrative agencies – Great Britain"
Goncalves, Marcio A. « A comparative study of hospital management in Great Britain and Brazil : cost information use ». Thesis, Aston University, 2002. http://publications.aston.ac.uk/10772/.
Texte intégralOduwobi, Tunde. « Ijebu under colonial rule, 1892-1960 an administrative and political analysis / ». Lagos : First Academic Publishers, 2004. http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/57964881.html.
Texte intégralTidwell, Ashley K. Hamilton Jeffrey S. « The military and administrative leadership of the Black Prince ». Waco, Tex. : Baylor University, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/2104/5249.
Texte intégralWiles, John. « Re-writing the civitas system : towards an alternative model for the local administrative infrastructure of Roman Britain ». Thesis, University of Wales Trinity Saint David, 2011. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.683054.
Texte intégralMelnick, Elaine Millar. « Women's employment, sex discrimination, and the law : legal and administrative remedies in Great Britain, with some reference to the United States ». Thesis, University of Surrey, 1986. http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/688/.
Texte intégralArmstrong, Gillian Claire. « Administrative justice and tribunals in South Africa : a commonwealth comparison ». Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/17997.
Texte intégralENGLISH ABSTRACT: In the field of administrative law, the judiciary has traditionally exercised control over the administrative actions of the executive through judicial review. However, judicial review is neither the most effective nor the most efficient primary control mechanism for systemic administrative improvement. In a country faced with a task of =transformative constitutionalism‘, and hindered with scarce resources, there is good cause to limit judicial intervention as the first response to administrative disputes. The major theme of this thesis is to investigate the feasibility of administrative tribunal reform in South Africa, using two other commonwealth countries, Australia and England, as a basis for comparison. Australia and England have been chosen for comparison because they share similar administrative law traditions and they can provide working models of coherent tribunal structures. The Australian tribunal system is well-established and consists of tribunals which fall under the control of the executive, while tribunals in England have recently undergone a significant transformation, and are now part of the independent judiciary. The South African government currently spends, indeed wastes, a significant amount of money on administrative law litigation. Due to the limitations of judicial review, even after the high costs of litigation and the long duration of court proceedings, the results achieved may still be unsatisfactory. Furthermore, judicial review is unsuited to giving effect to systemic administrative change and the improvement of initial decision-making. Australia and England have begun to move away from the traditional court model for the resolution of administrative disputes. Both have indicated a preference for the important role of tribunals in the administration of disputes. Tribunals have been shown to offer the advantage of being speedier, cheaper, more efficient, more participatory and more accessible than traditional courts, which contributes to tribunals being a more available resource for lay people or people without sophisticated legal knowledge, and provides wider access to remedies than courts. The English and Australian models indicate a few important trends which need to be applied universally to ensure a sustained tribunal reform and a system which provides a higher level of administrative redress than the over-burdened and institutionally inept courts currently do. These include co-operation among government departments and tribunals; open and accountable systemic change; the need for supervision and evaluation of the whole of administrative law by an independent and competent body; and ultimately a focus on the needs of users of state services. At the same time, there are arguments against administrative tribunal reform. These include the costs of reform; the ways to establish tribunals; and the level of independence shown by the tribunals. These arguments are especially relevant in the South African context, where the government faces huge social problems and a scarcity of resources. However, after an analysis of the valuable characteristics of tribunals and the role that they serve in the day to day administration of justice, it is difficult to see how these objections to tribunals can outweigh their potential importance in the administrative justice system. The need for sustained systematic reform in South Africa is one that cannot be ignored. Tribunals offer a valuable alternative to judicial review for the resolution of administrative disputes. Furthermore, the tribunal systems of Australia and England demonstrate how the effective creation and continued use of comprehensive tribunal structures contributes firstly to cost reduction and secondly to ease the administrative burden on courts who are not suited to cure large-scale administrative error.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: In die administratiefreg oefen die regsprekende gesag tradisioneel beheer uit oor die uitvoerende gesag deur middel van geregtelike hersiening. Geregtelike hersiening is egter nie die mees doeltreffende of effektiewe primêre beheermeganisme om sistemiese administratiewe verbetering teweeg te bring nie. In 'n land met die uitdagings van 'transformatiewe konstitusionalisme‘ en skaars hulpbronne, kan 'n goeie argument gevoer word dat geregtelike inmenging as die eerste antwoord op administratiewe dispute beperk moet word. Die deurlopende tema van hierdie tesis is 'n ondersoek na die lewensvatbaarheid van hervorming van administratiewe tribunale in Suid-Afrika, in vergelyking met die posisie in Australië en Engeland, waarvan beide ook, tesame met Suid-Afrika, deel vorm van die Statebond. Hierdie lande is gekies vir regsvergelykende studie aangesien hulle 'n administratiefregtelike tradisie met Suid-Afrika deel en beide werkende modelle van duidelike tribunale strukture daarstel. Die Australiese tribunale stelsel is goed gevestig en bestaan uit tribunale onder die beheer van die uitvoerende gesag, terwyl die tribunale stelsel in Engeland onlangs 'n beduidende hervorming ondergaan het en nou deel van die onafhanklike regsprekende gesag is. Die Suid-Afrikaanse regering mors aansienlike hoeveelhede geld op administratiefregtelike litigasie. Selfs na hoë koste en lang vertragings van litigasie mag die resultate steeds onbevredigend wees as gevolg van die beperkings inherent aan geregtelike hersiening. Tesame met hierdie oorwegings is geregtelike hersiening ook nie gerig op sistemiese administratiewe verandering en verbetering van aanvanklike besluitneming nie. Australië en Engeland het onlangs begin wegbeweeg van die tradisionele hof-gebaseerde model vir die oplossing van administratiewe dispute. Beide toon 'n voorkeur vir die belangrike rol wat tribunale in die administrasie van dispute kan speel Tribunale bied die bewese voordele om vinniger, goedkoper, meer doeltreffend, meer deelnemend en meer toeganklik te wees as tradisionele howe, sodat tribunale 'n meer beskikbare hulpbron is vir leke, oftewel, persone sonder gesofistikeerde regskennis en dus beter toegang tot remedies as tradisionele howe verskaf. Die Engelse en Australiese modelle dui op enkele belangrike tendense wat universeel toegepas moet word om volgehoue tribunale hervorming te verseker en om =n stelsel te skep wat 'n hoër vlak van administratiewe geregtigheid daarstel as wat oorlaaide en institusioneel onbekwame howe kan. Dit verwys bepaald na samewerking tussen staatsdepartemente en tibunale; deursigtige en verantwoordbare sistemiese veranderinge; die behoefte aan toesighouding en evaluasie van die hele administratiefreg deur 'n onafhanklike, bevoegde liggaam; en uiteindelik 'n fokus op die behoeftes van die gebruikers van staatsdienste. Daar is egter terselfdertyd ook argumente teen administratiewe tribunale hervorming. Hierdie argumente sluit in die koste van hervorming; die wyses waarop tribunale gevestig word; en die vlak van onafhanklikheid voorgehou deur tribunale. Hierdie argumente is veral relevant in die Suid-Afrikaanse konteks waar die regering voor groot sosiale probleme te staan kom en daarby ingesluit, 'n tekort aan hulpbronne ook moet hanteer. Daarenteen is dit moeilik om in te sien hoe enige teenkanting en teenargumente met betrekking tot die vestiging van administratiewe tribunale swaarder kan weeg as die potensiële belang van sulke tribunale in die administratiewe geregtigheidstelsel, veral nadat 'n analise van die waardevolle karaktereienskappe van tribunale en die rol wat hulle speel in die dag-tot-dag administrasie van geregtigheid onderneem is. Die behoefte aan volhoubare sistemiese hervorming in Suid-Afrika kan nie geïgnoreer word nie. Tribunale bied 'n waardevolle alternatief tot geregtelike hersiening met die oog op die oplossing van administratiewe dispute. Tesame hiermee demonstreer die tribunale stelsels in Australië en Engeland hoe die doeltreffende vestiging en deurlopende gebruik van omvattende tribunale bydra, eerstens om kostes verbonde aan die oplossing van administratiewe dispute te verlaag en tweedens, om die administratiewe las op die howe, wat nie aangelê is daarvoor om grootskaalse administratiewe foute reg te stel nie, te verlig.
Law, Jennifer. « Accountability of public organisations : an evaluation of the impact of information, organisational structures and markets ». Thesis, University of South Wales, 2004. https://pure.southwales.ac.uk/en/studentthesis/accountability-of-public-organisations(5bc37af1-dceb-449a-81de-c3d487d9c46b).html.
Texte intégralPrice, Lesley. « An exploration of the relationship between socio-economic factors and occupational major injury and fatality rates in the administrative districts of Great Britain 1999-2001 ». Thesis, Glasgow Caledonian University, 2006. https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.688251.
Texte intégralLANE, Lindsay. « Independent administrative agencies in France and Britain : the institution and its constitutional legitimacy ». Doctoral thesis, 1996. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/5452.
Texte intégralDRABKIN-REITER, Esther. « The Europeanisation of the law on legitimate expectations : recent case law of the English and European Union courts on the protection of legitimate expectations in administrative law ». Doctoral thesis, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/40324.
Texte intégralSupervisor: Professor Loïc Azoulai, European University Institute
This thesis considers the Europeanisation of English administrative law, in the specific context of the principle of protection of legitimate expectations. It assesses whether, how and to what extent the way in which the way in which legitimate expectations are protected in EU law has influenced the protection of legitimate expectations in English law. To make this assessment, a thorough analysis is conducted of case law in both jurisdictions. The thesis is structured into five main Chapters. Chapter A provides an introduction and looks at some general issues surrounding the concept of legitimate expectation, including which expectations are protectable and what is meant by legitimacy. Chapter B traces the development of the protection of legitimate expectations in English and EU law, and considers certain particular features in more detail for each jurisdiction, with the aim of establishing some parameters against which more recent case law can be tested and compared. In Chapter C an in-depth analysis of recent case law of the English courts, both falling within and outside the scope of EU law, is undertaken, and comparisons are drawn between these cases and with the traditional position of EU law on the protection of legitimate expectations. Chapter D contains a similar analysis in respect of recent cases of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Finally, Chapter E draws these analyses together and concludes that while there is limited convergence in the way English and EU courts approach the protection of legitimate expectations, both jurisdictions remain wary of external influence.
Livres sur le sujet "Administrative agencies – Great Britain"
James, Giddings Philip, et Study of Parliament Group, dir. Parliamentary accountability : A study of Parliament and executive agencies. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire : Macmillan Press, 1995.
Trouver le texte intégralP, Henderson C. A., dir. Councils, committees & boards : Including government agencies & authorities : a handbook of advisory, consultative, executive, regulatory & similar bodies in British public life. Beckenham : CBD Research, 1998.
Trouver le texte intégralP, Henderson Crispen A., dir. Councils, committees & boards : Including government agencies & authorities : a handbook of advisory, consultative, executive, regulatory & similar bodies in British public life. Beckenham : CBD Research, 1999.
Trouver le texte intégralSylvia, Horton, et Farnham David, dir. Public management in Britain. New York : St. Martin's Press, 1999.
Trouver le texte intégralJ, Wilson David, et Greenwood John R, dir. Public administration in Britain today. 2e éd. London : Unwin Hyman, 1989.
Trouver le texte intégralI, Jenkins W., dir. Administrative politics in British government. Sussex : Wheatsheaf Books, 1985.
Trouver le texte intégralGraham, Oates, Stott Andrew, Great Britain Prime Minister et Great Britain. Prime Minister. Efficiency Unit., dir. Making things happen : A report on the implementation of government efficiency scrutinies : report to the Prime Minister. London : H.M.S.O., 1985.
Trouver le texte intégralGreat Britain. National Audit Office. The creation of Ofcom : Wider lessons for public sector mergers of regulatory agencies : report. London : Stationery Office, 2006.
Trouver le texte intégralIrvine, John. Efficiency scrutiny report : The Scottish Office sponsorship of the non-departmental public bodies : report prepared for the Permanent Under Secretary of State, The Scottish Office. [Cardiff] : The Scottish Office, Efficiency Unit, 1994.
Trouver le texte intégralGreat Britain. Parliament. House of Commons. National Audit Office. Public service agreements : Managing data quality : compendium report : report by the Comptroller and Auditor General. London : Stationery Office, 2005.
Trouver le texte intégralChapitres de livres sur le sujet "Administrative agencies – Great Britain"
Schofield, John, John Carman et Paul Belford. « Legal and Administrative Frameworks ». Dans Archaeological Practice in Great Britain, 83–114. New York, NY : Springer New York, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09453-3_4.
Texte intégralRaustiala, Kal. « The Fall and Rise of Extraterritoriality ». Dans Does the Constitution Follow the Flag ? Oxford University Press, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195304596.003.0007.
Texte intégral« Agencies, ministers and civil servants in Britain ». Dans Politicians, Bureaucrats and Administrative Reform, 50–59. Routledge, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203391501-12.
Texte intégralEndicott, Timothy. « 12. Tribunals ». Dans Administrative Law. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198804734.003.0012.
Texte intégralEndicott, Timothy. « 12. Tribunals ». Dans Administrative Law, 467–99. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780192893567.003.0012.
Texte intégralStefan, Marco, et Leonhard den Hertog. « Frontex : Great Powers but No Appeals ». Dans Boards of Appeal of EU Agencies, 151–74. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192849298.003.0008.
Texte intégralJowell, Jeffrey. « Administrative Law ». Dans The British Constitution in the Twentieth Century. British Academy, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197263198.003.0010.
Texte intégralHendriks, Carolyn M., Selen A. Ercan et John Boswell. « Connecting Citizens and Administrative Policymaking ». Dans Mending Democracy, 90–119. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198843054.003.0005.
Texte intégralFarmer, Andrew M. « The relationship between research and policy on acidification impacts in the nature conservation agencies of Great Britain ». Dans Studies in Environmental Science, 523–24. Elsevier, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0166-1116(08)70141-9.
Texte intégral« No. 35434. China (for Hong Kong Special Administrative Region) and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ». Dans United Nations Treaty Series, 195–243. UN, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.18356/446c95e0-en-fr.
Texte intégralActes de conférences sur le sujet "Administrative agencies – Great Britain"
Halo, Su. « I35W Bridge Collapse : Design Issues in Past and Challenges Revealed for Future ». Dans ASME 2010 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. ASMEDC, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/imece2010-38312.
Texte intégralYue, Wang, Zhan Lechang, Ma Wenjuan, Zhang Yongxin et Ma Li. « Research on Approval of Domestic and International Transport Container Application of Radioactive Material ». Dans 2017 25th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/icone25-66279.
Texte intégralNicoleta, Danescu. « VOCATIONAL DISTANCE LEARNING OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES IN THE EU AND COMPARATIVE STUDIES WITH THE UK, GERMANY, AUSTRALIA AND THE U.S.A. » Dans eLSE 2012. Editura Universitara, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.12753/2066-026x-12-170.
Texte intégralAbdullah, Yahya. « Judicial oversight of applications submitted to the administration is a reason for its development ». Dans INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF DEFICIENCIES AND INFLATION ASPECTS IN LEGISLATION. University of Human Development, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.21928/uhdicdial.pp191-212.
Texte intégral