Livres sur le sujet « 2010 a-540 »

Hayes and Williams’ Family Law, now in its sixth edition, provides critical and case-focused discussion of the key legislation and debates affecting adults and children. The volume takes a critical approach to the subject and includes ‘talking points’ and focused ‘discussion questions’ throughout each chapter which highlight areas of debate or controversy. The introductory chapter within this edition provides a discussion of the law’s understanding of ‘family’ and the extent to which this has changed over time, a detailed overview of the meaning of private and family life within Article 8 of the ECHR, and a discussion of the Family Justice Review and subsequent developments. Part 1 of this edition, supplemented by the ‘Latest Developments’ section, outlines the most up-to-date statistics on the incidence of marriage, civil partnerships and divorce, discusses recent case law on the validity of marriage such as Hayatleh v Mofdy [2017] EWCA Civ 70 and K v K (Nullity: Bigamous Marriage) [2016] EWHC 3380 (Fam), and highlights the recent Supreme Court decision (In the Matter of an Application by Denise Brewster for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) [2017] 1 WLR 519) on the pension rights of unmarried cohabitants. It also considers the litigation concerning the prohibition of opposite-sex civil partnership registration from the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Steinfeld and Keidan v Secretary of State for Education [2017] EWCA Civ 81 to the important decision of the Supreme Court in R (on the application of Steinfeld and Keidan) (Application) v Secretary of State for International Development (in substitution for the Home Secretary and the Education Secretary) [2018] UKSC 32. This edition also provides an in-depth discussion of the recent Supreme Court decision in Owens v Owens [2018] UKSC 41 regarding the grounds for divorce and includes discussion of Thakkar v Thakkar [2016] EWHC 2488 (Fam) on the divorce procedure. Further, this edition also considers the flurry of cases in the area of financial provision on divorce such as Waggott v Waggott [2018] EWCA Civ 722; TAB v FC (Short Marriage: Needs: Stockpiling) [2016] EWHC 3285; FF v KF [2017] EWHC 1903 (Fam); BD v FD (Financial Remedies: Needs) [2016] EWHC 594 (Fam); Juffali v Juffali [2016] EWHC 1684 (Fam); AAZ v BBZ [2016] EWHC 3234 (Fam); Scatliffe v Scatliffe [2016] UKPC 36; WM v HM [2017] EWFC 25; Hart v Hart [2017] EWCA Civ 1306; Sharp v Sharp [2017] EWCA Civ 408; Work v Gray [2017] EWCA Civ 270, and Birch v Birch [2017] UKSC 53. It also considers the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Mills v Mills [2018] UKSC 38 concerning post-divorce maintenance obligations between former partners, and the Privy Council decision in Marr v Collie [2017] UKPC 17 relating to the joint name purchase by a cohabiting couple of investment property.Part 2 focuses on child law, examining the law on parenthood and parental responsibility, including the parental child support obligation. This edition includes discussion of new case law on provision of child maintenance by way of global financial orders (AB v CD (Jurisdiction: Global Maintenance Orders)[2017] EWHC 3164), new case law and legislative/policy developments on section 54 of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (parental orders transferring legal parenthood in surrogacy arrangements), and new cases on removing and restricting parental responsibility (Re A and B (Children: Restrictions on Parental Responsibility: Radicalisation and Extremism) [2016] EWFC 40 and Re B and C (Change of Names: Parental Responsibility: Evidence) [2017] EWHC 3250 (Fam)). Orders regulating the exercise of parental responsibility are also examined, and this edition updates the discussion with an account of the new Practice Direction 12J (on contact and domestic abuse), and controversial case law addressing the tension between the paramountcy of the child’s welfare and the protected interests of a parent in the context of a transgender father’s application for contact with his children (Re M (Children) [2017] EWCA Civ 2164). Part 2 also examines the issue of international child abduction, including in this edition the Supreme Court’s latest decision, on the issue of repudiatory retention (Re C (Children) [2018] UKSC 8). In the public law, this edition discusses the Supreme Court’s clarification of the nature and scope of local authority accommodation under section 20 of the Children Act 1989 (Williams v London Borough of Hackney [2018] UKSC 37). In the law of adoption, several new cases involving children who have been relinquished by parents for adoption are examined (Re JL & AO (Babies Relinquished for Adoption),[2016] EWHC 440 (Fam) and see also Re M and N (Twins: Relinquished Babies: Parentage) [2017] EWFC 31, Re TJ (Relinquished Baby: Sibling Contact) [2017] EWFC 6, and Re RA (Baby Relinquished for Adoption: Final Hearing)) [2016] EWFC 47).

India experienced substantial mortality decline in the decades after 1971. By 2016 life expectation probably averaged about 68 years. However, much of the mortality decline resulted from narrow technical developments (e.g. immunizations) and was not always matched by commensurate advances in the state of the population’s health. The Emergency of 1975–77 led to sterilization excesses, and there was a backlash against the family planning programme. Subsequently, political leaders generally avoided talking about family planning and population growth. Partly as a result, the pace of fertility decline during 1971–2016 was slow. By 2016 the average level of fertility was about 2.4 births per woman. It was not until the 2001–11 intercensal decade that there was an appreciable fall in the rate of population growth. Consequently, between 1971 and 2016 the population grew from 548 million to more than 1.3 billion.

Essential Cases: EU Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Germany v Parliament and Council (‘Tobacco Advertising I’) (Case C-376/98), ECLI:EU:C:2000:544, [2000] ECR I-8419, 5 October 2000. The document also included supporting commentary from author Noreen O’Meara.

Essential Cases: EU Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Germany v Parliament and Council (‘Tobacco Advertising I’) (Case C-376/98), EU:C:2000:544, [2000] ECR I-8419, 5 October 2000. The document also included supporting commentary from author Noreen O’Meara.

Each Concentrate revision guide is packed with essential information, key cases, revision tips, exam Q&As, and more. Concentrates show you what to expect in a law exam, what examiners are looking for, and how to achieve extra marks. Equity & Trusts Concentrate covers all aspects of equity and trusts. Chapters look at the history and development of equity. The second chapter looks at the concept of a trust. The book also examines charitable, non-charitable purpose, secret, and implied trusts. Finally, issues relating to breach of trust and liabilities are covered. This edition has been updated with recent developments in the law and new case coverage including: Grondona v Stoffel & Co [2021] AC 540; Khan v Mahmood [2021] EWHC 597 Ch; Cohabitation Rights Bill 2021 HL; and Knipe v British Racing Drivers’ Motor Sport Charity & Others [2020] EWHC 3295.

A humanidade vive um momento histórico ocasionado pela primeira pandemia do século XXI, a COVID-19. No mês de março de 2020, surgem os primeiros casos no Brasil, desde então, o país entrou em distanciamento/isolamento social, e com isso, a sociedade vem sofrendo impactos que se refletem na vida social, econômica, política e educacional. Com o atual contexto, o sistema educacional necessitou se adequar a essas novas condições que a sociedade enfrenta. Diante disso, ações rápidas foram tomadas pelo Ministério da Educação, que criou a Portaria N. 544, 16 de junho de 2020, que dispõe sobre a substituição das aulas presenciais por aulas em meios digitais, enquanto durar a situação de pandemia do COVID-19. Logo, as instituições educacionais precisaram se re(organizar) para atender com qualidade e equidade todos os estudantes.

Same-sex marriage continues to be a polarizing subject in the United States and other parts of the world. This new edition of Same-Sex Marriage: A Reference Handbook brings readers up to date on the status of same-sex unions from social, legal, political, and historical perspectives. According to Pew Research poll data, in 2001, the majority of Americans opposed same-sex marriage 57 percent against, 35 percent in support. As of 2015, a majority of Americans (55 percent) supported same-sex marriage, with 39 percent expressing opposition. The landmark Obergefell v. Hodges case, in which the U.S. Supreme Court held in a 54 decision that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples, is likely further influencing opinions among U.S. citizens. Still, controversy and heated debate continues to ensue on the social, legal, and political implications of same-sex marriage. The second edition of Same-Sex Marriage: A Reference Handbook presents thorough coverage of recent changes in the legal status of same-sex marriage in the United States as well as essays that provide historical perspectives on same-sex marriage; an extensive, up-to-date bibliography; a collection of primary source documents; a glossary; and a chronology that will serve readers studying the topic. New material includes a detailed discussion of the 2015 Supreme Court of the United States decision as well as coverage of issues that have arisen as a result of the Obergefell case, such as the debate over "religious freedom" and LGBT civil rights legislation.

Esta obra é composta por 21 capítulos, elaborados por 54 autores, os quais se debruçaram sobre os múltiplos temas que perpassam as atividades daqueles(as) que se dedicam a tornar as universidades e as instituições de ensino tecnológico em ambientes amistosos para a diversidade humana, em especial para alunos, docentes e técnicos com deficiência. Esta coletânea corresponde à memória do III Congresso Nacional de Inclusão na Educação Superior e Educação Profissional Tecnológica, realizado entre os dias 23 e 27 de novembro de 2020, na modalidade online, respeitando o distanciamento físico necessário para resguardar vidas humanas. A terceira edição desse congresso confrontou-se com fatos inéditos e apresentou reflexões e práticas para o cotidiano da inclusão, com o tema central: “Questões emergentes no contexto contemporâneo”. Izabel M. M. de Loureiro Maior (Prefaciadora)

This chapter discusses the law and practice of oaths and affirmations in international arbitration, particularly in England and Wales. These include the Oaths Act 1978, which provides details of the wording to be spoken while swearing an oath or making an affirmation; the Perjury Act 1911, which prescribes sanctions for not telling the truth; section 38(5) of the English Arbitration Act 1996, which provides that the arbitral tribunal has the power to direct that a party or witness shall be examined on oath or affirmation, and may for that purpose administer any necessary oath or take any necessary affirmation; the 1998 LCIA Rules on the testimony of a witness; and Article 54(d) of the 2014 WIPO Arbitration Rules, which provide that the testimony of witnesses may, either at the choice of a party or as directed by the tribunal, be submitted in written form, whether by way of ‘signed statements, sworn affidavits or otherwise’.

El objetivo fue determinar la prevalencia del Síndrome Metabólico y los factores de riesgo en los empleados y trabajadores de los GAD Municipales y Provinciales de Chimborazo, periodo octubre 2020 – diciembre 2021, obteniendo un total de 709 muestras sanguíneas donde se redujeron El número de pacientes mujeres fue de 326 (46%) y de hombres 383 (54%); el 10% se prolonga con síndrome metabólico según la Organización Mundial de la Salud y el 5% según la Federación Internacional de Diabetes, su mayor prevalencia en un rango de edad de 26 a 35 años. Los factores asociados con el síndrome metabólico en orden fueron: Obesidad las mujeres con el 21% y el 13 % en los hombres; Tipo de alimentación del nivel 1 con 45% consumido pan, cereales y postres y el nivel 5, y con un 85% de la población consumido azucares, helados. Concluyendo que la población tiene un desconocimiento acerca del síndrome metabólico, y que existe una estrecha relación entre los factores de riesgo en la población estudiada. Se recomienda realizar un seguimiento personalizado de manera coordinada con el médico ocupacional y mejorar el estilo de vida